Combined Hip Arthroscopy Research Articles

Combined hip arthroscopy with periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia: a systematic review

Combined hip arthroscopy with periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia: a systematic review

The Use of Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy for Hip Dysplasia Is Increasing and Has Low Complication Rates

PurposeTo analyze annual use of hip arthroscopy (HA) and Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for the treatment of hip dysplasia (HD), as well as post-operative outcomes, including ipsilateral reoperations. MethodsNinth and Tenth Revision codes of the International Classification of Diseases were used to query the PearlDiver™ Mariner database from January 2010 through January 2022 to identify patients aged 10-59 years who had a presenting diagnosis of HD and subsequently underwent: 1) HA; 2) PAO; or 3) combined HA and PAO (HA-PAO, defined as PAO on the same day or within 28 days following HA). We analyzed annual rates for each treatment, as well as rates of post-operative emergency visits, readmissions and five-year ipsilateral secondary operations (determined via Kaplan-Meier analysis). ResultsThere were 32,068 patients who underwent surgical treatment of HD. For HA, PAO, and HA-PAO, there were 29,700, 2,083, and 285 patients, respectively. All operations had the highest percent-increase from 2015 to 2016. HA and HA-PAO peaked in 2021, while PAO peaked in 2019. For HA, PAO, and HA-PAO, the majority of cases were performed in female patients and patients aged 30-49 years, 10-19 years, and 10-29 years, respectively. The five-year incidence of ipsilateral secondary operations, which include revision HA, PAO, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty, was 9.2% (95% CI: 8.6%- 9.8%) in the HA group and 6.5% (95% CI: 4.1%- 8.8%) in the PAO group. Combining HA with PAO resulted in so few secondary operations that Kaplan-Meier analysis was infeasible. The PAO cohort had the highest 30-day emergency visit and 90-day readmission rates, with infection as the most common cause for readmission. ConclusionHA is more frequently performed than PAO for hip dysplasia. HA-PAO is rising at the greatest rate, demonstrating fewer complications and reoperations.

A New Arthroscopic Classification for Chondrolabral Disease in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Current classification systems for intra-articular pathology intraoperatively have been described for patients with femoroacetabular impingement rather than dysplasia. To (1) describe intra-articular findings in dysplastic hips undergoing combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO); (2) propose a new chondrolabral classification system for dysplastic hips based on these findings; and (3) correlate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) with the newly proposed classification. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. A total of 46 hips underwent combined hip arthroscopy and PAO at our institution between September 2013 and December 2014, irrespective of symptoms or radiographic findings. PROMs were evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. At the time of hip arthroscopy, the chondrolabral junction was classified as normal without tear (1 hip, type 1); hypertrophic labrum without chondrolabral disruption (19 hips, type 2); chondrolabral disruption on the articular side, not extending into the capsular side (16 hips, type 3A); chondrolabral disruption extending through the capsular side (3 hips, type 3B); and exposed acetabular subchondral bone (7 hips, type 4). There was a significant difference in postoperative modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) (P = .020), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scores (P = .037), and WOMAC total scores (P = .049) between chondrolabral junction types. Post hoc analyses demonstrated significant differences between type 2 (84.9 ± 12.9) and type 3A (67.8 ± 20.7; P = .198), and between type 2 and type 4 (59.3 ± 24.3; P = .011) in postoperative mHHS scores; and between type 2 (83.9 ± 12.9) and type 3A (68.9 ± 23.7; P = .045) in postoperative WOMAC total scores. In multivariate analysis, chondrolabral type 3 or type 4, age >35 years, and previous surgery were significantly correlated with worse mHHS scores at 2 years. This new chondrolabral classification is proposed to describe intra-articular pathology seen during combined hip arthroscopy and PAO, specifically in dysplastic hips. More advanced chondrolabral disease was associated with worse PROMs at 2 years.

Decision Making in Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Femoral Derotational Osteotomy Surgeries

Background: Femoral version abnormalities can contribute to intra-articular hip pathology. Combined hip arthroscopy with femoral derotational osteotomy (FDRO) has been shown to successfully treat those with intra-articular hip pathology with excessive anteversion or retroversion of the femur. Indications: We describe the technique for combined hip arthroscopy and FDRO in patients with symptomatic intra-articular hip pathology in the setting of excessive anteversion or retroversion of the femur. Technique Description: Hip arthroscopy is performed using standard anterolateral, modified mid-anterior, and distal anterolateral accessory portals. The labrum is repaired using a narrow diameter suture. Femoroplasty is performed with utilization of fluoroscopic imaging to assess resection. Dynamic flexion is performed as a final check of adequacy of resection. Capsular closure is performed in all cases. After hip arthroscopy, the patient is repositioned on a radiolucent table. A piriformis start point is obtained with a guide pin followed by standard opening reaming and ball-tipped guidewire placement. A femoral osteotomy is made just proximal to the isthmus and made through a lateral approach to the femur. Two K-wires are placed distal and proximal to the osteotomy site. A goniometer is then used to measure rotation. A drill is used to perforate the cortex circumferentially at the osteotomy site. After standard reaming, a sagittal saw is then used to start the osteotomy cut followed by an osteotome. An intramedullary nail is inserted over a ball-tipped guidewire while rotational reduction is assessed from the foot of the operating table. Distal interlocking screws are placed, and the nail is backslapped to create compression at the osteotomy site prior to placing proximal interlocking screws. Results: Recent studies show improved hip outcome scores in patients who undergo concomitant hip arthroscopy and FDRO for symptomatic abnormal femoral version. Discussion/Conclusion: Identifying patients who would benefit from concomitant surgeries requires thorough preoperative evaluation. Correct identification and treatment of these patients leads to improved outcomes. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Improved Functional Outcomes of Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship at minimum 2-year follow-up after combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) performed in the setting of a single anesthetic event. Patients who underwent combined hip arthroscopy (M.J.P.) and PAO (J.M.M.) between January 2017 and June 2020 were identified. Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative PROs including Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), HOS-Sport, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, 12-Item Short Form Survey Mental Component Scores (SF-12 MCS), and 12-Item Short Form Survey Physical Component Score were collected and compared in addition to revision rate, conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), and patient satisfaction. Twenty-four of 29 patients (83%) eligible for the study were available for 2-year minimum follow-up with a median follow-up time of 2.5 years (range, 2.0-5.0). There were 19 females and 5 males with mean age of 31 ± 12 years. Mean preoperative lateral center edge angle was 20° ± 5° and alpha angle was 71° ± 11°. One patient underwent reoperation for removal of a symptomatic iliac crest screw at 11.7 months after operation. Two patients, a 33-year-old woman and a 37-year-old man, were converted to THA at 2.6 and 1.3 years, respectively, following the combined procedure. Both patients had a Tönnis grade of 1 on radiographs, as well as bipolar Outerbridge grade III/IV defects requiring microfracture of the acetabulum. For patients who did not convert to THA (n= 22), there was significant improvement from before to after surgery for all scores (P<.05) except SF-12 MCS. The minimal clinically significant difference and patient-acceptable symptom state rates for HOS-ADL, HOS-Sport, and mHHS were 72%, 82%, 86%, and 95%, 91%, and 95%, respectively. Median patient satisfaction was 10 (range, 4 to 10). Single-stage combined hip arthroscopy with periacetabular osteotomy for patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia results in improvement in PROs and arthroplasty free survivorship of 92% at median 2.5 year follow-up. Level IV, case series.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Are Similar in the First 2 Years After Staged Versus Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy for Hip Dysplasia

The purpose of this study was to compare early patient-reported outcomes after staged versus combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia. A prospective database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients that underwent combined or staged hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) from 2012 to 2020. Patients were excluded if they were >40 years of age, had prior ipsilateral hip surgery, or did not have at least 12-24 months of postoperative patient-reported outcome (PRO) data. PROs included the Hip Outcomes Score (HOS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sports Subscale (SS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and the Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Paired t-tests were used to compare preoperative to postoperative scores for both groups. Outcomes were compared using linear regression adjusted for baseline characteristics, including age, obesity, cartilage damage, acetabular index, and procedure timing (early vs late practice). Sixty-two hips were included in this analysis (39 combined, 23 staged). The average length of follow-up was similar between the combined and staged groups (20.8 vs 19.6 months; P= .192). Both groups reported significant improvements in PROs at final follow up compared to preoperative scores (P < .05 for all). There were no significant differences in HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, NAHS, or mHHS scores between groups preoperatively or at 3, 6, or 12 months postoperatively (P > .05 for all). There was no significant difference in PROs between the combined and staged groups at the final postoperative time point: HOS-ADL (84.5 vs 84.3; P= .77), HOS-SS (76.0 vs 79.2; P= .68), NAHS (82.2 vs 84.5; P= .79), and mHHS (71.0 vs 71.0, P= .75), respectively. Staged hip arthroscopy and PAO for hip dysplasia leads to similar PROs at 12-24 months compared to combined procedures. This suggests that with careful and informed patient selection, staging these procedures is an acceptable option for these patients and does not change early outcomes. Level III, retrospective comparative.

Addition of Pericapsular Nerve Group and Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks Significantly Reduces Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Concomitant Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Previous studies have evaluated the effect of the pericapsular nerve group block for hip arthroscopy and the transverse abdominis plane block for periacetabular osteotomy and have shown decreased narcotic consumption in both groups. No published study has evaluated the effectiveness of combining the blocks when performing hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy under the same general anesthesia. It was hypothesized that patients treated for hip dysplasia with hip arthroscopy and concomitant periacetabular osteotomy using a pericapsular nerve group block, transverse abdominis plane block, and general anesthesia would have decreased postoperative pain and require less narcotic consumption than those undergoing the procedure with general anesthetic alone. Methods:A single surgeon performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing concomitant hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy between 11/2020 and 6/2021. Fifteen consecutive patients undergoing the procedure with a general anesthetic alone (no-block group) were compared to 15 patients undergoing the same procedure with a combined pericapsular nerve group block, transverse abdominis plane block, and general anesthetic (block group).Hip arthroscopy was performed utilizing a post-free technique, and a rectus sparing approach was used for the periacetabular osteotomy. The nerve blocks were performed by multiple anesthesiologists using previously published methods. Operating room time, length of stay, visual analog scale pain scores, and total narcotic consumption in morphine milliequivalents were analyzed. Groups were compared using the chi-squared test for non-continuous demographic variables and a two-tailed t-test for continuous variables utilizing Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA), p-value set at 0.05 for significance. Results:The no-block group consisted of 14 females and one male, while the block group was all females. No significant differences were observed between age, sex, BMI, surgery time, length of stay, or procedures performed, p>0.05. The maximal visual analog scale score in the post-anesthesia care unit was 8 ± 1.3 vs. 7 ± 1.9 in the no-block vs. block groups, respectively, p=0.15. The average hospital floor visual analog scale score was 5.7 ± 1.3 vs. 4.8 ± 1.3 in the no-block vs. block groups, respectively, p=0.07. Total pain medications required were 217.6 ± 54.6 vs. 154 ± 41.9 morphine milliequivalents in the no-block vs. block groups, respectively, p=0.001. No complications were reported in either group, and no patient in the block group demonstrated motor nerve palsy or postoperative fall. This study demonstrated that patients undergoing combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia who had pericapsular nerve group, transverse abdominal plane block, and general anesthesia required fewer narcotics in the first 24 hours after surgery compared to those who had general anesthesia alone.

Treatment of Concomitant Intra-articular Pathology and Hip Dysplasia With Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy Using a Single Radiolucent Traction Table Attachment Without a Perineal Post

Combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy are used for the treatment of concomitant intra-articular hip pathology and acetabular dysplasia or instability. Traditionally, the procedure has been achieved with the use of a traction table or table attachment for the arthroscopic portion and then subsequent transfer of the patient to a fully radiolucent flat bed. In this article, we highlight the technique of a combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy procedure using a single bed attachment system.

Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO): Technical Focus on Arthroscopically Elevating the Iliocapsularis and Performing the Open PAO

In this Technical Note, we discuss the combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for the treatment of symptomatic hip dysplasia, with a focus on the technique we use for the PAO. We identify modifications that can be made during the arthroscopic portion of the procedure to assist in the PAO dissection, including arthroscopic capsular closure and arthroscopic elevation of the iliocapsularis muscle off the capsule, which allows for expedited open exposure during the PAO.

Arthroscopic assessment of concomitant intraarticular pathologies in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

ABSTRACT This study's purpose is to arthroscopically assess the occurrence of intraarticular pathologies in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (OFNH) and to compare arthroscopic with radiologic findings. In a retrospective cohort analysis of ONFH patients undergoing combined core decompression (CD) and hip arthroscopy, concomitant intraarticular pathologies were qualitatively and quantitatively assessed by means of arthroscopy. Intraoperative findings were compared with preoperative radiodiagnostics. Descriptive statistics were performed with results displaying type, degree and prevalence of co-pathologies. Based on a cohort of 27 hips with ONFH at ARCO stages II and III, 26 (96.3%) presented with concomitant intraarticular findings. Cam-deformity (n = 22; 81.5%), labral defects (n = 23; 85.2%) and chondral defects (n = 20; 74.1%) were the most frequent. Four hips (14.8%) had foveal ligament anomalies. Intraoperative detection of cam-deformity positively correlated with radiologically assessed pathologic α angles (p = 0.09). Radiologic evaluation of the acetabular labrum distinctly differed from arthroscopic findings. Reliable statements concerning the cartilage status were not possible due to the great difference in quality of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs). The results of this study revealed an arthroscopically proven prevalence of co-pathologies in >95% of patients with ONFH. Cam-type deformity, labral anomalies and chondral defects were the most frequent. Comparison of arthroscopic and radiologic findings showed coherent results regarding cam-deformity but revealed distinct difficulties in the assessment of the labral and chondral status emphasizing the need for standardization of preoperative radiodiagnostics. Moreover, it still has to be evaluated whether combined CD and arthroscopy can improve on the overall outcomes achieved by performance of CD only.

What Mid-term Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores, Reoperations, and Complications Are Associated with Concurrent Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy to Treat Dysplasia with Associated Intraarticular Abnormalities?

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a well-accepted treatment for acetabular dysplasia, but treatment success is not uniform. Concurrent hip arthroscopy has been proposed for select patients to address intraarticular abnormalities. The patient-reported outcomes, complications, and reoperations for concurrent arthroscopy and PAO to treat acetabular dysplasia remain unclear. (1) What are the functional outcome scores among select patients treated with PAO plus concurrent hip arthroscopy at mid-term follow-up? (2) What factors are associated with conversion to THA or persistent symptoms (modified Harris hip score ≤ 70 or WOMAC pain subscore ≥ 10)? (3) What proportion of patients underwent further hip preservation surgery at mid-term follow-up? (4) What are the complications associated with the procedure? Between November 2005 and December 2012, 78 patients (81 hips) who presented with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia-defined as a lateral center-edge angle less than 20° with hip pain for more than 3 months that interfered with daily function-had undergone unsuccessful nonsurgical treatment, had associated intraarticular abnormalities on MRI, and underwent combined hip arthroscopy and PAO. Eleven patients did not have minimum 4-year follow-up and were excluded, leaving 67 patients (70 hips) who met our inclusion criteria and had a mean follow-up duration of 6.5 ± 1.6 years. We retrospectively evaluated patient-reported outcomes at final follow-up using the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and the WOMAC pain subscore. Conversion to THA or persistent symptoms were considered clinical endpoints. Repeat surgical procedures were drawn from a prospectively maintained database, and major complications were graded according to the validated Clavien-Dindo classification (Grade III or IV). Student t-tests, chi-square tests, and Fisher exact tests identified the association of patient factors, radiographic measures, and surgical details with clinical endpoints. For patients who underwent bilateral procedures, only the first hip was included in our analyses. At final follow-up, the mean mHHS for all patients improved from a mean ± SD of 55 ± 19 points to 85 ± 17 points (p < 0.001), the UCLA activity score improved from 6.5 ± 2.7 points to 7.5 ± 2.2 points (p = 0.01), and the WOMAC pain score improved from 9.1 ± 4.3 points to 3.2 ± 3.9 points (p < 0.001). Three percent (2 of 67) of patients underwent subsequent THA, while 21% (15 of 70) of hips were persistently symptomatic, defined as mHHS less than or equal to 70 or WOMAC pain subscore greater than or equal to 10. Univariate analyses indicated that no patient demographics, preoperative or postoperative radiographic metrics, or intraoperative findings or procedures were associated with subsequent THA or symptomatic hips. Worse baseline mHHS and WOMAC pain scores were associated with subsequent THA or symptomatic hips. Seven percent (5 of 67) of patients underwent repeat hip preservation surgery for recurrent symptoms, and 4% (3 of 67) of patients had major complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade III or IV). This study demonstrated that concurrent hip arthroscopy and PAO to treat symptomatic acetabular dysplasia (with intraarticular abnormalities) has good clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up in many patients; however, persistent symptoms or conversion to THA affected almost a quarter of the sample. We noted an acceptable complication profile. Further study is needed to directly compare this approach to more traditional techniques that do not involve arthroscopy. We do not use isolated hip arthroscopy to treat symptomatic acetabular dysplasia. Level IV, therapeutic study.

Periacetabular osteotomy with or without arthroscopic management in patients with hip dysplasia: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BackgroundHip dysplasia is one of the most common causes of hip arthritis. Its incidence is estimated to be between 3.6 and 12.8% (Canadian Institute for Health Information, Hip and knee replacements in Canada, 2017–2018: Canadian joint replacement registry annual report, 2019; Jacobsen and Sonne-Holm, Rheumatology 44:211–8, 2004). The Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO) has been used successfully for over 30 years (Gosvig et al., J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1162–9, 2010), but some patients continue to exhibit symptoms post-surgery (Wyles et al., Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:336–50, 2017). A hip arthroscopy, performed using a small camera, allows surgeons to address torn cartilage inside the hip joint. Although both procedures are considered standard of care treatment options, it is unknown whether the addition of hip arthroscopy improves patient outcomes compared to a PAO alone. To delay or prevent future joint replacement surgeries, joint preservation surgery is recommended for eligible patients. While previous studies found an added cost to perform hip arthroscopies, the cost-effectiveness to Canadian Health care system is not known.MethodsPatients randomized to the experimental group will undergo central compartment hip arthroscopy prior to completion of the PAO. Patients randomized to the control group will undergo isolated PAO. Patient-reported quality of life will be the primary outcome used for comparison between the two treatment groups as measured by The International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) (Saberi Hosnijeh et al., Arthritis Rheum 69:86–93, 2017). Secondary outcomes will include the four-square step test and sit-to-stand (validated in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain) and hip-specific symptoms and impairment using the HOOS; global health assessment will be compared using the PROMIS Global 10 Score; health status will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L and EQ VAS questionnaires (Ganz et al., Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:264–72, 2008) pre- and post-operatively. In addition, operative time, hospital length of stay, adverse events, and health services utilization will be collected. A sub-group of patients (26 in each group) will receive a T1rho MRI before and after surgery to study changes in cartilage quality over time. A cost-utility analysis will be performed to compare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with the intervention.DiscussionWe hypothesize that (1) concomitant hip arthroscopy at the time of PAO to address central compartment pathology will result in clinically important improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) versus PAO alone, that (2) additional costs associated with hip arthroscopy will be offset by greater clinical improvements in this group, and that (3) combined hip arthroscopy and PAO will prove to be a cost-effective procedure.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03481010. Registered on 6 March 2020. Protocol version: version 3.

Single Table Concomitant Post-Less Hip Arthroscopy Combined with Periacetabular Osteotomy for Hip Dysplasia

It has been well established that both arthroscopic and open hip preservation techniques can result in improved patient outcomes and interrupt the natural history of hip disease. Traditionally, hip arthroscopy has been used to address central and peripheral compartment disease consisting of labral tears, impingement morphology and cartilage pathology. The periacetabular osteotomy has been the most used treatment for hip instability caused by inadequate acetabular coverage of the femoral head or dysplasia. With failures of periacetabular osteotomy linked to postoperative impingement and the high incidence of intra-articular pathology in the dysplastic hip, there has been a great interest in combing hip arthroscopy with the periacetabular osteotomy. Here, we describe a technique for a single table, single drape, postless combined hip arthroscopy, and periacetabular osteotomy.

The Addition of Hip Arthroscopy to Periacetabular Osteotomy Does Not Increase Complication Rates: A Prospective Case Series

Background: Previous studies on periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) reported complication and reoperation rates of 5.9% and 10%, respectively. Hip arthroscopy is increasingly utilized as an adjunct procedure to PAO to precisely treat associated intra-articular pathology. The addition of this procedure has the potential of further increasing complication rates. Purpose: To determine the rates of complication and reoperation of combined hip arthroscopy and PAO for the treatment of acetabular deformities and associated intra-articular lesions. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Using a prospective database, the authors retrospectively reviewed 248 hips (240 patients) that underwent combined hip arthroscopy and PAO between 2007 and 2016. Data were collected at scheduled follow-up visits at approximately 1 month, 3 to 4 months, and 1 and 2 years after surgery. Mean follow-up from surgery was 3 years (range, 1-8 years). A total of 220 PAOs were done for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia, 18 for symptomatic acetabular retroversion, and 10 for combined acetabular dysplasia and acetabular retroversion. Central compartment arthroscopy was performed for treatment of intra-articular chondrolabral pathology in all cases. Select cases underwent femoral head-neck junction osteochondroplasty either arthroscopically before the PAO or through an open approach after it. Complications were graded according to the modified Dindo-Clavien complication scheme, which was validated for hip preservation procedures. Reoperations (excluding hardware removal) were recorded. Results: Grade III complications occurred among 7 patients (3%) while there were no grade IV complications. Grade III complications included deep infection (n = 3), wound dehiscence (n = 1), hematoma requiring exploration (n = 1), symptomatic heterotopic ossification requiring excision (n = 1), and deep venous thrombosis (n = 1). There were 13 reoperations (5%), and 3 were repeat hip arthroscopy. Univariate Cox hazard models were used to estimate the relative risk factors for complication and reoperation. Increased age (per decade) showed over twice the increased likelihood for complications (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.67-3.74). Also, preoperative diagnosis of acetabular retroversion, not acetabular dysplasia, showed >3 times the increased risk of reoperation (hazard ratio, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.41-6.61). Conclusion: The rate of complications reported is comparable (3%) with previously published complication rates of PAO without hip arthroscopy. In this cohort, increasing age and diagnosis of acetabular retroversion were associated with higher complication and reoperation rates.

Multi-Centered Comparison of Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy Versus Combined Hip Arthroscopy Alone and Peri-acetabular Osteotomy in Patients with Acetabular Dysplasia

Multi-Centered Comparison of Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy Versus Combined Hip Arthroscopy Alone and Peri-acetabular Osteotomy in Patients with Acetabular Dysplasia

Acetabular Focal Chondral Lesions Are Not Associated With Worse Outcomes After Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Matched Group Analyses

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients who underwent combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy with acetabular focal chondral defects and compare these outcomes with a group of patients without focal chondral defects. MethodsA retrospective review looking at patients who underwent hip arthroscopy and/or periacetabular osteotomy was performed. Minimum 2-year follow-up, Tönnis grade 0-1, and a Beck chondromalacia stages 4-5 were included. Twenty-eight hips met inclusion criteria. These patients were then matched 1:1 and compared. ResultsThe average acetabular chondral defect size was 144.3 mm2 ± standard deviation 116.2. Postoperative, modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and University of California Los Angeles scores were similar between groups (P = .382, P = .755, P = .763, respectively). At the last follow-up, Tönnis grade was similar between groups (P = .552). No association between having a defect and increased risk of failure was noted (hazard ratio 1.35 [95% CI 0.43-4.24], P = .607). ConclusionWe found that patients with focal chondral defects did similar to a comparison group of patients without chondral defects.

Modifications to the Hip Arthroscopy Technique When Performing Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy

In the realm of hip preservation, hip arthroscopy is often used to address intra-articular impingement pathology, whereas periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is used to address dysplasia and instability. Indications to combine these 2 procedures include hip dysplasia and symptomatic instability with a concomitant symptomatic labral tear or the other symptomatic intra-articular pathology (i.e., loose body, chondral flap). The arthroscopic portion of the procedure allows repair of the injured labrum and close inspection of the hip joint, and the PAO addresses undercoverage and/or inappropriate version of the acetabulum. The open approach used in PAO also allows access to the peripheral compartment to debride a cam lesion, if present, and the subspine region is accessible to perform subspine decompression, if needed. In this technique, we highlight special considerations pertaining to hip arthroscopy that is performed in combination with a PAO. Hip arthroscopy is the first procedure that takes place in this combined case, and modifications to the standard hip arthroscopic technique can prevent unnecessary difficulty during the PAO that follows.

Multi-centered Comparison of Patient Reported Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy versus Combined Hip Arthroscopy Alone and Peri-acetabular Osteotomy in Patients with Acetabular Dysplasia

Objectives:The purpose of this study was to compare prospectively collected patient reported outcomes (PRO) data in patients undergoing Hip Arthroscopy alone versus combined Hip Arthroscopy and Peri-acetubular Osteotomy (HA/PAO).Methods:Prospectively collected PRO data was reviewed in patients enrolled in IRB approved studies at two high volume hip preservation centers who underwent either Hip Arthroscopy alone or combined HA/PAO. Patients were included who had a lateral center edge angle <25 degrees, completed pre-operative and a minimum of 1 year post-operative PRO data. Questionnaires were administered to patients at intervals including pre-operative, 3 months, 1 year and 2 years post-operative. Questionnaires were composed of validated PRO scores: modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sports subscales, Non-arthritic Hip Score (NAHS) and Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS).Results:Prospectively collected data was reviewed for 91 patients who underwent Hip Arthroscopy and 34 patients who underwent HA/PAO. Average age at the time of surgery was 32 years old (range 14-62) for arthroscopy and 31 years old (range 15-51) for combined surgery. Hip Arthroscopy patients were 35% male and 65% female. HA/PAO patients were 15% male and 85% female. PRO data for Hip Arthroscopy, reported as averages with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses at pre-operative, 3 months, 1 year and 2 years post-operatively. mHHS: 66.3 (3.1), 83.8 (3.5), 84.3 (4.1), 84.4 (3.4). HOS ADL: 70.1 (4.0), 85.3 (3.2), 87.1 (4.2), 87.4 (4.0). HOS Sports: 47.3 (4.6), 64.7 (6.6), 73.7 (8.1), 75.2 (5.9). NAHS: 65.5 (3.7), 80.1 (3.3), 83.8 (4.5), 83.8 (3.9). Pain VAS: 5.4 (0.5), 2.6 (0.5), 2.5 (0.6), 2.6 (0.6). PRO data for HA/PAO, reported as averages with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses at pre-operative, 3 months, 1 year and 2 years post-operatively. mHHS: 51.1 (4.6), 58.7 (7.9), 71.7 (7.3), 74.7 (13.1). HOS ADL: 58.3 (6.5), 65.7 (9.0), 83.6 (9.8), 85.1 (18.7). HOS Sports: 41.7 (7.2), 38.0 (11.7), 72.5 (11.5), 79.3 (11.9). NAHS: 56.7 (5.2), 71.6 (5.3), 80.2 (7.7), 83.4 (11.8). Pain VAS: 5.3 (0.9), 1.9 (0.8), 2.2 (1.0), 1.0 (0.9).Conclusion:Both cohorts had significant improvement in all PRO measures at 1 and 2 years when compared to pre-operative PRO measures. HA/PAO patients had significantly lower mHHS and HOS ADL pre-operatively; NAHS approached significance. HOS Sports and Pain VAS had no significant pre-operative differences between groups. At 3 months, the HA/PAO patients had significantly lower mHHS, HOS ADL and HOS Sports, while again NAHS approached significance. There was no significant difference in Pain VAS at 3 months. Only the mHHS remained significantly lower for the HA/PAO patients at 1 year. At 2 years, only Pain VAS showed significantly better pain scores for HA/PAO patients, although lacking clinical significance. All other PRO measures showed no significant difference at 2 years. Patients who underwent HA/PAO had significantly lower pre-operative and early post-operative PRO measures. HA/PAO patients, however, reached similar values for PRO measures by 1 year; only the mHHS remained lower. At 2 years, neither group showed statistical or clinical difference in PRO measures.

Concomitant Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy: Is there a Difference in Perioperative Complications compared with Periacetabular Osteotomy Alone?

ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate the safety of hip arthroscopy combined with a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) compared with PAO alone in treating concomitant intra-articular pathology in hip dysplasia. Materials and methods Forty-one patients (46 hips) with symptomatic hip dysplasia were retrospectively reviewed. Pre- and postoperative radiographic data and intraoperative data consisting of estimated blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusions, operative time, and length of hospital stay were recorded. The complications occurring within the first 3 months after surgery including lateral femoral cutaneous and pudendal nerve neuropraxia, wound complications, and reoperations were recorded. Additionally, rates of deep venous thrombosis and other major adverse outcomes (myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, stroke, death) were examined. Results Twenty-one patients (24 hips) underwent PAO alone. Twenty patients (22 hips) underwent hip arthroscopy followed immediately by PAO. There were no significant differences in the 90-day complication rates between the two groups, comparing the rate of neuropraxia (p = 0.155) and wound complications (p = 0.6). Operative time for PAO alone was 179 minutes (standard deviation [SD] ± 37) compared with 251 minutes (SD ± 52) for combined hip arthroscopy and PAO (p &lt; 0.001). No incidence of deep vein thrombosis or major adverse events was noted in either group. Preoperative lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and acetabular index (AI) were 14° and 20° respectively, in the PAO-alone group and 19° and 16° respectively, in the combined group. Postoperatively, LCEA was 29° in the PAO-alone group and 30° in the combined group. Postoperative AI was 11° in the PAO-alone group and 5° in the combined group. Conclusion This study demonstrates that hip arthroscopy in combination with PAO to treat intra-articular pathology shows no difference in 90-day complication rates when compared with PAO alone. Level of evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study How to cite this article Neumann JA, Rickert KD, Bradley KE, Lewis BD, France MA, Olson SA. Concomitant Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy: Is there a Difference in Perioperative Complications compared with Periacetabular Osteotomy Alone? The Duke Orthop J 2017;7(1):51-57.

Complications after Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Peri-acetabular Osteotomy

Complications after Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Peri-acetabular Osteotomy