Combined Heart-liver Transplantation Research Articles

Combined Heart-Liver Transplant vs. Heart Transplant Alone: A Single Center Experience

Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is a viable option for concurrent heart and liver failure, yet its indications are unclear. This preliminary study aimed to describe pre-transplant characteristics and outcomes of patients with liver fibrosis undergoing HT and CHLT, while exploring decompensated liver dysfunction following HT. A total of 52 patients (HT = 42; CHLT = 10) were included. In HT patients, F1 fibrosis was more common (52%), with 43% exhibiting F3 or F4 fibrosis. F4 fibrosis was predominant in the CHLT patients (80%). Post-hepatic portal hypertension was present in 62% of HT and 90% of CHLT patients. None progressed to liver decompensation (i.e., new ascites, variceal bleed, jaundice, hepatic hydrothorax, or hepatic encephalopathy) after HT. Over a median follow-up period of 3.7 [IQR 1.2–9.1] years, the two groups did not differ statistically in survival (p = 0.60). Altogether, HT and CHLT may have similar survival outcomes, and HT patients may not progress to decompensation postoperatively despite advanced fibrosis. Decompensated cirrhosis could serve as a factor for identifying CHLT candidates, but it is crucial to differentiate it from post-hepatic portal hypertension, which does not necessitate liver transplant. Further research is needed to determine selection criteria for CHLT, ensuring efficient utility of organs.

Pediatric Combined Heart-liver Transplantation: A Single-center Long-term Experience.

Combined heart liver transplant (CHLT) continues to gain attention as a surgical treatment for patients with end-stage heart and liver disease but remains rare. We present our institutional longitudinal experience with up to 14 y of follow-up, focused on long-term outcomes in CHLT recipients. We conducted a single-institutional, retrospective review from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2023, including 7 patients ages 7-17 y who underwent CHLT. Most patients were surgically palliated via Fontan procedure pretransplant (n = 6), and all had evidence of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis before transplant. The 30-d mortality was 14.3% (n = 1, multiorgan failure). During the follow-up period, 1 patient developed acute heart rejection which required treatment and 2 developed acute liver rejection. In all cases, rejection was successfully treated. Two patients developed acute heart rejection which did not require treatment (grade 1R). No patients developed chronic or refractory rejection. No patients developed allograft coronary artery vasculopathy. CHLT remains a rarely performed treatment for pediatric patients with end-stage heart and liver disease, but our long-term data suggest that this treatment strategy should be considered more frequently.

Differences in outcomes of combined heart-liver transplantation by primary cardiac diagnosis

Differences in outcomes of combined heart-liver transplantation by primary cardiac diagnosis

Effect of liver abnormalities on mortality in Fontan patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundFontan-associated liver disease (FALD) is one of the most common complications following Fontan procedure, but the impact of FALD on survival outcomes remains controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine and quantify the influence of liver disease on the survival of Fontan patients.MethodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed, and relevant human studies published from inception up to 12 August 2022 were searched. Stata (version 17.0) was applied to perform the meta-analysis, using random effects (Mantel-Haenszel) models. The I2 statistic was used to assess the heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were employed to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the potential influence of each study on the overall pooled results.ResultsA total of 312 records were initially identified and 8 studies involving 2,466 patients were selected for inclusion. Results revealed a significant association between the severity of liver disease following Fontan procedure and mortality, which was confirmed by sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis assessing post-HT mortality. Meta-regression showed that diagnostic methods for liver disease may be a source of heterogeneity. After removal of the FALD patients identified by international classification of disease codes, heterogeneity was markedly reduced, and the positive association between all-cause mortality and the severity of liver disease became significant.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis showed the severity of liver disease following the Fontan procedure has a significant association with mortality. Lifelong follow-up is necessary and imaging examinations are recommended for routine surveillance of liver disease. Among patients with failing Fontan and advanced liver disease, combined heart-liver transplantation may provide additional survival benefits.

(532) - Combined Heart-Liver Transplantation: Indications, Outcomes, and Risk Factors

(532) - Combined Heart-Liver Transplantation: Indications, Outcomes, and Risk Factors

(533) - Adults with “Fontan Associated Liver Failure”- Is Combined Heart Liver Transplantation Always Necessary?

(533) - Adults with “Fontan Associated Liver Failure”- Is Combined Heart Liver Transplantation Always Necessary?

(1169) - Thinking Outside the Box: dd-cfDNA and Gene-Expression Profiling in Combined Heart-Liver Transplantation (CHLT)

(1169) - Thinking Outside the Box: dd-cfDNA and Gene-Expression Profiling in Combined Heart-Liver Transplantation (CHLT)

Fontan-Associated Liver Disease: A Review.

Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD) is a chronic complication of the Fontan procedure, a palliative surgery for patients with congenital heart disease that results in a single-ventricle circulation. The success of the Fontan procedure has led to a growing population of post-Fontan patients living well into adulthood. For this population, FALD is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It encompasses a spectrum of hepatic abnormalities, ranging from mild fibrosis to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The pathophysiology of FALD is multifactorial, involving hemodynamic and inflammatory factors. The diagnosis and monitoring of FALD present many challenges. Conventional noninvasive tests that use liver stiffness as a surrogate marker of fibrosis are unreliable in FALD, where liver stiffness is also a result of congestion due to the Fontan circulation. Even invasive tissue sampling is inconsistent due to the patchy distribution of fibrosis. FALD is also associated with both benign and malignant liver lesions, which may exhibit similar imaging features. There is therefore a need for validated diagnostic and surveillance protocols to address these challenges. The definitive treatment of end-stage FALD is also a subject of controversy. Both isolated heart transplantation and combined heart-liver transplantation have been employed, with the latter becoming increasingly preferred in the US. This article reviews the current literature on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of FALD, and highlights knowledge gaps that require further research.

Rejection in the setting of combined Heart and Liver Transplantation

IntroductionEach year the number of combined heart-liver transplants (HLT) increases, with two distinct patient populations proceeding down this pathway. The first are patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), most commonly single ventricle patients palliated with Fontan. The second group are those with long standing congestive hepatopathy, amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, or alcohol induced myopathies and liver disease.One argument for HLT has been the low rate of rejection even among sensitized patients, with reported rejection rates ranging from 0% to 31%. Historically, those with CHD have been highly sensitized which in some cases may prevent or at least delay transplantation. As such, a recent consensus statement by Emamaulee et al. suggest that “there may be an immunological benefit to proceed with HLT with significantly fewer acute cellular and humoral rejection episodes”. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that HLT patients remain at risk for rejection and have required treatment for it. ResultsThere were 15 patients who underwent HLT from January 2017 to February 2022. Of the four patients who did not have CHD, none were considered sensitized, and all underwent induction with basiliximab per our institutional protocol. One of these had rejection. Rejection episodes were identified in four of the 11 CHD patients (36%) patients. ConclusionsIn our study of 15 HLT, including 11 CHD patients (73% denied transplant at ≥ 1 center) demonstrated a higher rate of rejection than previously reported. While theoretically, HLT may mitigate the likelihood of rejection, the risk still exists, and patients benefit from close monitoring commensurate with single organ transplant.

Liberal use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in combined sequential heart-liver transplantation.

Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is a rarely though increasingly performed procedure with evolving indications. Despite CHLT being performed at only a handful of centers, the use of intraoperative mechanical circulatory support to optimize hemodynamics and facilitate dual-organ transplantation varies widely. At our center, we liberally utilize veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) when a veno-venous shunt is anticipated to be insufficient in mitigating the hemodynamic perturbations associated with liver reperfusion. In this series, we describe our experience with V-A ECMO in sequential (heart-first) CHLT and demonstrate highly favorable outcomes with this strategy.

Outcomes after combined heart liver transplantation: a comprehensive single center review

Outcomes after combined heart liver transplantation: a comprehensive single center review

Fontan associated liver disease

Fontan surgery is vital for infants born with a single-ventricle heart. This intervention establishes a new blood flow circuit bypassing the single ventricle, thereby the separating pulmonary and systemic circulation to preserve single ventricular function. However, it carries risks of hepatic complications, collectively termed Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD), characterized by progressive hepatic congestion and fibrosis potentially leading to an equivalent of cirrhosis. Diagnosis and staging of FALD are complex, requiring multidisciplinary management. In advanced FALD, consideration is given to heart transplantation alone or combined heart-liver transplantation, underscoring the importance of an integrated approach to optimize care for these increasingly more common patients.

Summary of a consensus conference on heart-liver transplantation

Patients with severe heart disease may have coexisting liver disease from various causes. The incidence of combined heart-liver transplant (CHLT) is increasing as more patients with congenital heart disease survive to adulthood and develop advanced heart failure with associated liver disease from chronic right-sided heart or Fontan failure. However, the criteria for CHLT have not been established. To address this unmet need, a virtual consensus conference was organized on June 10, 2022, endorsed by the American Society of Transplantation. The conference represented a collaborative effort by experts in cardiothoracic and liver transplantation from across the United States to assess interdisciplinary criteria for liver transplantation in the CHLT candidate, surgical considerations of CHLT, current allocation system that generally results in the liver following the heart for CHLT, and optimal post-CHLT management. The conference served as a forum to unify criteria between the different specialties and to forge a pathway for patients who may need dual organ transplantation. Due to the continuing shortage of available donor organs, ethical issues related to multiorgan transplantation were also debated. The findings and consensus statements are presented.

Perioperative Characteristics and Outcomes of Fontan Versus Non-Fontan Patients Undergoing Combined Heart-Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is becoming increasingly frequent as a maturing population of patients with Fontan-palliated congenital heart disease develop advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. The authors present their experience with CHLT for congenital and noncongenital indications, and identify characteristics associated with poor outcomes that may guide intervention in high-risk patients. This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. This study was conducted at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee. The study included 16 consecutive adult recipients of CHLT at the authors' institution between April 2017 and February 2022. Eleven patients underwent transplantation for Fontan indications, and 5 were transplanted for non-Fontan indications. Compared with non-Fontan patients, Fontan recipients had longer cardiopulmonary bypass duration (199 v 119 minutes, p =m0.002), operative times (786 v 599 minutes, p = 0.01), and larger blood product transfusions (15.4 v 6.3 L, p = 0.18). Six of 16 patients required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), of whom 4 were Fontan patients who subsequently died. Patients who required ECMO had lower 5-hour lactate clearance (0.0 v 3.5 mmol/L, p = 0.001), higher number of vasoactive infusions, lower pulmonary artery pulsatility indices (0.58 v 1.77, p = 0.03), and higher peak inspiratory pressures (28.0 v 18.5 mmHg, p = 0.01) after liver reperfusion. Combined heart-liver transplantation in patients with Fontan-associated end-organ disease is particularly challenging and associated with higher recipient morbidity compared with non-Fontan-related CHLT. Early hemodynamic intervention for signs of ventricular dysfunction may improve outcomes in this growing high-risk population.

Review of pediatric combined heart-liver transplantation: A roadmap to success.

Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is a promising technique to address end stage organ failure in patients with concomitant heart failure and chronic liver disease. While most experience with CHLT has involved adult patients, the expanding population of children born with univentricular congenital heart disease who underwent the Fontan procedure and develop Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD) has emerged as a growing indication for pediatric CHLT. Currently, CHLT is performed at a select subset of experienced transplant centers, especially in the pediatric population. While technically demanding, CHLT may offer survival benefit when compared to heart transplant alone with decreased rejection of both synchronous allografts and equivalent outcomes with respect to waitlist time and post-operative complications. Limitations in the technique can be attributed to need for an appropriate multidisciplinary care center, challenges with donor organ availability and allocation, and the complexity associated with patient selection and peri-operative management. In this review, we summarize the history of CHLT, discuss patient selection, and highlight key facets of peri-operative care in the pediatric population.

Iatrogenic Acute Ascending Aortic Dissection During Combined Heart/Liver Transplant for Amyloidosis

We report a case of iatrogenic acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) during a combined heart-liver transplant in a patient with amyloid-associated cardiac and hepatic failure. The patient developed ATAAD of the recipient's aorta during the heart transplantation. Because there was no sign of malperfusion or proximal extension into the donor aorta, we proceeded with the liver transplantation and continued medical management for ATAAD. The patient was discharged uneventfully 30 days after the transplant, and computed tomography coronary angiogram after 4 months showed stable dissection. During a heart transplant, ATAAD of the native aorta without malperfusion syndrome can be managed conservatively with close progress monitoring.

Clinical Outcomes of Adult Fontan-Associated Liver Disease and Combined Heart-Liver Transplantation

BackgroundThe impact of Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD) on post-transplant mortality and indications for combined heart-liver transplant (CHLT) in adult Fontan patients remains unknown. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the impact of FALD on post-transplant outcomes and compare HT vs CHLT in adult Fontan patients. MethodsWe performed a retrospective-cohort study of adult Fontan patients who underwent HT or CHLT across 15 centers. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) Fontan; 2) HT/CHLT referral; and 3) age ≥16 years at referral. Pretransplant FALD score was calculated using the following: 1) cirrhosis; 2) varices; 3) splenomegaly; or 4) ≥2 paracenteses. ResultsA total of 131 patients (91 HT and 40 CHLT) were included. CHLT recipients were more likely to be older (P = 0.016), have a lower hemoglobin (P = 0.025), require ≥2 diuretic agents pretransplant (P = 0.051), or be transplanted in more recent decades (P = 0.001). Postmatching, CHLT demonstrated a trend toward improved survival at 1 year (93% vs 74%; P = 0.097) and improved survival at 5 years (86% vs 52%; P = 0.041) compared with HT alone. In patients with a FALD score ≥2, CHLT was associated with improved survival (1 year: 85% vs 62%; P = 0.044; 5 years: 77% vs 42%; P = 0.019). In a model with transplant decade and FALD score, CHLT was associated with improved survival (HR: 0.33; P = 0.044) and increasing FALD score was associated with worse survival (FALD score: 2 [HR: 14.6; P = 0.015], 3 [HR: 22.2; P = 0.007], and 4 [HR: 27.8; P = 0.011]). ConclusionsHigher FALD scores were associated with post-transplant mortality. Although prospective confirmation of our findings is necessary, compared with HT alone, CHLT recipients were older with higher FALD scores, but had similar survival overall and superior survival in patients with a FALD score ≥2.

Morbidity and Mortality in Adult Fontan Patients After Heart or Combined Heart-Liver Transplantation

BackgroundAn increasing number of adult Fontan patients require heart transplantation (HT) or combined heart-liver transplant (CHLT); however, data regarding outcomes and optimal referral time remain limited. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to define survivorship post-HT/CHLT and predictors of post-transplant mortality, including timing of referral, in the adult Fontan population. MethodsA retrospective cohort study of adult Fontan patients who underwent HT or CHLT across 15 centers in the United States and Canada was performed. Inclusion criteria included the following: 1) Fontan; 2) HT/CHLT referral; and 3) age ≥16 years at the time of referral. Date of “failing” Fontan was defined as the earliest of the following: worsening fluid retention, new ascites, refractory arrhythmia, “failing Fontan” diagnosis by treating cardiologist, or admission for heart failure. ResultsA total of 131 patients underwent transplant, including 40 CHLT, from 1995 to 2021 with a median post-transplant follow-up time of 1.6 years (Q1 0.35 years, Q3 4.3 years). Survival was 79% at 1 year and 66% at 5 years. Survival differed by decade of transplantation and was 87% at 1 year and 76% at 5 years after 2010. Time from Fontan failure to evaluation (HR/year: 1.23 [95% CI: 1.11-1.36]; P < 0.001) and markers of failure, including NYHA functional class IV (HR: 2.29 [95% CI: 1.10-5.28]; P = 0.050), lower extremity varicosities (HR: 3.92 [95% CI: 1.68-9.14]; P = 0.002), and venovenous collaterals (HR: 2.70 [95% CI: 1.17-6.20]; P = 0.019), were associated with decreased post-transplant survival at 1 year in a bivariate model that included transplant decade. ConclusionsIn our multicenter cohort, post-transplant survival improved over time. Late referral after Fontan failure and markers of failing Fontan physiology, including worse functional status, lower extremity varicosities, and venovenous collaterals, were associated with post-transplant mortality.

Combined Heart-Liver vs Isolated Heart Transplantation in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

BackgroundDespite an increasing number of adults with congenital heart disease undergoing combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT), there is a paucity of literature analyzing posttransplant outcomes. We analyzed the incidence and outcomes of congenital heart disease patients undergoing CHLT compared with those undergoing isolated heart transplantation (HT). MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of all adult (≥18 years) congenital heart disease patients undergoing CHLT or HT between 2000 and 2020 in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. The primary outcome was death at 30 days and 1 year after transplantation. ResultsOf 1214 recipients included for analysis, 92 (8%) underwent CHLT and 1122 (92%) underwent HT. Patients undergoing CHLT and HT were similar in the distribution of age, sex, and serum bilirubin. Upon adjusted analysis with HT as the reference, undergoing CHLT was associated with a similar hazard of 30-day mortality between 2000 and 2017 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.12-2.08; P = .35) and 2018 and 2020 (HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 0.88-6.13; P = .09). Similarly, there was no difference in the hazard of 1-year mortality for patients undergoing CHLT between 2000 and 2017 (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.22-1.63; P = .32) and 2018 and 2020 (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.66-3.53; P = .33) compared with HT. ConclusionsThe number of adults undergoing CHLT continues to rise. Given comparable survival outcomes between CHLT and HT, our findings demonstrate the former as a viable option for complex congenital heart disease patients with failing cavopulmonary circulation and associated liver disease. Future studies should delineate factors associated with early hepatic dysfunction to help identify congenital heart disease patients that would benefit from CHLT.

Combined heart-liver transplantation practices survey in North America: Evaluation and organ listing practices.

We conducted a web-based survey to characterize liver transplant (LT) evaluation and listing practices for patients being evaluated for combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT), with a specific emphasis on patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), around transplant centers in North America. Very few protocols for liver evaluation and listing in patients undergoing combined heart-liver transplantation are published, and no guidelines currently exist on this topic. A subject of intense debate in the transplant community is the decision of which patients with CHD and liver disease benefit from CHLT compared with heart transplantation. A focus group from the American Society of Transplantation Liver-Intestine Community of Practice Education Subcommittee developed a web-based survey that included questions (1) respondee demographic information; (2) LT evaluation practices in CHLT; (3) liver organ listing practices in CHLT, and (4) 4 clinical vignettes with case-based scenarios in CHLT liver listings among CHD patients who underwent Fontan palliation. The survey was distributed to medical and surgical LT program directors of 47 centers that had completed at least 1 CHLT up to July 2021 in the US and the University of Toronto, Canada. The survey had an excellent 83% response rate (87% for centers that completed at least 1 CHLT in the past 5y). Total 66.7% used transjugular liver biopsy with HVPG measurements, 30% used percutaneous liver biopsy with no consensus on the use of a fibrosis staging system, 95% mandated contrasted cross-sectional imaging, and 65% upper endoscopy. The following isolated findings evaluation mandated CHLT listing: isolated elevated HVPG (61.5%); the presence of portosystemic collaterals on imaging (67.5%); the endoscopic presence of esophageal or gastric varices (75%), and the presence of HCC (80%), whereas the majority of centers did not feel that the presence of isolated splenomegaly (100%), thrombocytopenia (81.6%), endoscopic findings of portal hypertensive gastropathy (66.7%), or highly sensitized patients (84.6%) justified CHLT. In our survey of North American centers that had performed at least 1 CHLT in the past 5 years, we observed heterogeneity in practices for both evaluation and listing protocols in these patients.