Combined Coronary Bypass Research Articles

Immediate results of combined coronary bypass surgery and aortic valve replacement with incomplete and complete myocardial revascularization

Introduction. Coronary heart disease and aortic valve stenosis still occupy a leading position among cardiovascular diseases. Against the background of an increase in life expectancy, patients with a combined pathology of the heart are increasingly appearing. Without surgical treatment, such patients have an unfavorable prognosis of life with a high mortality rate. Simultaneous surgical correction of coronary heart disease and aortic valve stenosis is a treatment method that can improve the prognosis and prolong the life of a patient. At the same time, combined interventions remain higher-risk operations compared to isolated aortic valve replacement and isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.The Objective was to evaluate the effect of incomplete and complete myocardial revascularization on the immediate results of surgical correction of combined pathology of the aortic valve and coronary arteries.Methods and Materials. For the period from 2017 until June 2022, 62 aortic valve replacement operations in combination with coronary artery bypass grafting were performed in the cardiac surgery department of the Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital. The operated patients were divided into two groups. The group 1 included (n=32) patients who underwent aortic valve replacement and complete myocardial revascularization. The group 2 included patients (n=30) who underwent aortic valve replacement and incomplete myocardial revascularization.Results. Postoperative periods in both groups, according to the structure of early postoperative complications, are generally similar. The mortality rate in both groups did not exceed the predicted mortality rate and corresponded to the data of various literary sources.Conclusion. Our observation data showed that the mortality rate in the early postoperative period, in combined operations, does not depend on the completeness of revascularization in combined operations of coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement. It is necessary to perform as complete myocardial revascularization in combined operations as technically feasible and appropriate in a clinical situation.

Long-term outcomes of combined coronary bypass surgery and carotid endarterectomy in patients with type 2 diabetes

At present, there are no studies on the analysis of the incidence of complications in patients with concomitant lesions of the coronary and internal carotid arteries (ICA) after combined operation of carotid endarterectomy (CE) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) against the background of type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, there is no doubt that this condition can be a predictor of cardiovascular and wound complications during in-hospital and long-term postoperative periods.Aim. To study in-hospital and long-term outcomes of combined CABG+CE in patients with and without type 2 diabetes.Material and methods. This multicenter retrospective study for the period from January 2015 to December 2019 included 653 patients with concomitant atherosclerotic lesions of ICA and coronary arteries, who underwent combined CE+CABG. Depending on presence of type 2 diabetes, 2 groups were formed: group 1 (n=183) — patients with type 2 diabetes; group 2 (n=471) — patients without type 2 diabetes. The duration of postoperative follow-up was 37,8±14,9 months.Results. During hospitalization, significant differences in the incidence of death (group 1 =1,1%; group 2 =1,0%; p=0,97), myocardial infarction (MI) (group 1 =1,1%; group 2 =0,8%; p=0,76), bleeding events (group 1 =1,1%; group 2 =0,8%; p=0,76) were not detected. However, stroke (group 1 =3,8%; group 2 =0,4%; p=0,0008), sternal wound infection and mediastinitis (group 1 =3,3%; group 2 =0,2%; p=0,0006) were significantly more often developed in patients with type 2 diabetes.In the long-term follow-up period, death (group 1 =6,6%; group 2 =1,1%; p<0,0001), MI (group 1 =4,9%; group 2 =0,8%; p=0,0008), stroke (group 1 =7,7%; group 2 =1,5%; p<0,0001), ICA restenosis (group 1 =8,8%; group 2 =1,6%; p<0,0001), repeated emergency myocardial revascularization (group 1 =7,2%; group 2 =1,5%; p=0,0002), repeated emergency cerebral revascularization (group 1 =8,8%; group 2 =1,6%; p<0,0001) were significantly more often recorded in patients with type 2 diabetes.Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and its comparison using the log rank test revealed that the death, MI, and stroke were also significantly more often observed in patients with type 2 diabetes (p=0,0007, p=0,003, p<0,0001, respectively).Conclusion. Patients with type 2 diabetes who are referred for combined CE+CABG are at an increased risk of stroke, sternal wound infection and mediastinitis in the in-hospital postoperative period, as well as all adverse cardiovascular events in the long-term follow-up period.

Long-term outcomes of combined coronary bypass surgery and carotid endarterectomy in patients with type 2 diabetes

At present, there are no studies on the analysis of the incidence of complications in patients with concomitant lesions of the coronary and internal carotid arteries (ICA) after combined operation of carotid endarterectomy (CE) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) against the background of type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, there is no doubt that this condition can be a predictor of cardiovascular and wound complications during in-hospital and long-term postoperative periods.Aim. To study in-hospital and long-term outcomes of combined CABG+CE in patients with and without type 2 diabetes.Material and methods. This multicenter retrospective study for the period from January 2015 to December 2019 included 653 patients with concomitant atherosclerotic lesions of ICA and coronary arteries, who underwent combined CE+CABG. Depending on presence of type 2 diabetes, 2 groups were formed: group 1 (n=183) — patients with type 2 diabetes; group 2 (n=471) — patients without type 2 diabetes. The duration of postoperative follow-up was 37,8±14,9 months.Results. During hospitalization, significant differences in the incidence of death (group 1 =1,1%; group 2 =1,0%; p=0,97), myocardial infarction (MI) (group 1 =1,1%; group 2 =0,8%; p=0,76), bleeding events (group 1 =1,1%; group 2 =0,8%; p=0,76) were not detected. However, stroke (group 1 =3,8%; group 2 =0,4%; p=0,0008), sternal wound infection and mediastinitis (group 1 =3,3%; group 2 =0,2%; p=0,0006) were significantly more often developed in patients with type 2 diabetes.In the long-term follow-up period, death (group 1 =6,6%; group 2 =1,1%; p<0,0001), MI (group 1 =4,9%; group 2 =0,8%; p=0,0008), stroke (group 1 =7,7%; group 2 =1,5%; p<0,0001), ICA restenosis (group 1 =8,8%; group 2 =1,6%; p<0,0001), repeated emergency myocardial revascularization (group 1 =7,2%; group 2 =1,5%; p=0,0002), repeated emergency cerebral revascularization (group 1 =8,8%; group 2 =1,6%; p<0,0001) were significantly more often recorded in patients with type 2 diabetes.Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and its comparison using the log rank test revealed that the death, MI, and stroke were also significantly more often observed in patients with type 2 diabetes (p=0,0007, p=0,003, p<0,0001, respectively).Conclusion. Patients with type 2 diabetes who are referred for combined CE+CABG are at an increased risk of stroke, sternal wound infection and mediastinitis in the in-hospital postoperative period, as well as all adverse cardiovascular events in the long-term follow-up period.

The effect of clinical coronary disease severity on outcomes of carotid endarterectomy with and without combined coronary bypass

ObjectiveThe management of patients with carotid stenosis and symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) is challenging. This study assessed the impact of clinical coronary disease severity on carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with and without combined coronary artery bypass (CCAB). MethodsUsing the Vascular Quality Initiative, patients with symptomatic CAD who underwent CCAB or isolated CEA (ICEA) from 2003 to 2017 were identified. Patients were stratified by CAD severity: stable angina (SA) and recent myocardial infarction/unstable angina (UA). Primary outcomes, including perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke/death/MI (SDM), were assessed between procedures within each CAD cohort. ResultsThere were 9098 patients identified: 887 CCAB patients (215 [24%] SA, 672 [76%] UA) and 8211 ICEA patients (6385 [78%] SA, 1826 [22%] UA). Overall, CCAB patients had higher rates of stroke (2.6% vs 1.3%; P = .002) and SDM (7.3% vs 3.5%, P < .001) but similar rates of MI (0.9% vs 1.6%; P = .12) compared with ICEA patients. In SA patients, no difference was seen in stroke (ICEA 1.2% vs CCAB 1.9%; P = .36), MI (1.3% vs 1.4%; P = .95), or SDM (2.9% vs 4.7%; P = .13). In UA patients, no difference was seen in stroke (ICEA 1.6% vs CCAB 2.8%; P = .06), but ICEA patients had higher rates of MI (2.4% vs 0.7%; P = .01) and CCAB patients had higher rates of SDM (8.2% vs 5.5%; P = .01). After logistic regression in the UA cohort, predictors of MI included ICEA (odds ratio [OR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-7.0; P = .04) and carotid symptomatic status (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-3.8; P = .01); carotid symptomatic status also predicted stroke (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.6; P = .03), but CCAB did not. ConclusionsIn patients with symptomatic CAD, both clinical CAD severity and operative strategy affect outcomes. In SA patients, CCAB does not increase perioperative morbidity. However, CCAB in UA patients prevents MI while not appreciably increasing stroke risk. This suggests that coronary revascularization before or concomitant with CEA should be considered in UA patients but that prioritizing coronary intervention is less important in SA patients.

The effect of combining coronary bypass with carotid endarterectomy in patients with unrevascularized severe coronary disease

ObjectiveManagement of significant carotid stenosis in those with symptomatic coronary disease remains controversial. Staged and combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with coronary artery bypass grafting has been described. Yet, an understanding of the additive risks of these approaches is poor. This study sought to assess outcomes in patients with clinically relevant coronary disease undergoing either isolated CEA (ICEA) or combined CEA and coronary artery bypass (concurrent coronary artery bypass [CCAB]). MethodsAll CEAs in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2003 to 2017 were reviewed. CCABs were identified, as were ICEAs in patients with unrevascularized stable angina, unstable angina, or myocardial infarction (MI) within 6 months of operation. CCABs were compared with ICEAs as well as with a risk-matched cohort of ICEAs. Primary outcomes included perioperative stroke, all-cause death, MI, and these as composite (SDM). Univariate analysis and logistic regression were performed. ResultsThere were 4042 patients identified, including 2582 ICEA patients (64%) and 1460 CCAB patients (36%); 61% were male, 91% were white, and 39% had symptomatic carotid disease. Overall stroke was 3.5%, death 1.8%, and SDM 6.0%. ICEA had higher rates of postoperative MI (1.9% vs 0.9%; P = .01) but lower rates of stroke (2.8% vs 4.7%; P = .002), death (1.0% vs 3.0%; P < .001), and SDM (5.1% vs 7.5%; P = .002). After regression, predictors of SDM were congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.4; P < .001), urgent operation (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2; P = .001), and CCAB (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.01-1.7; P = .04). After propensity matching, ICEA continued to have higher rates of perioperative MI (2.6% vs 1.0%; P = .01) and lower rates of death (1.0% vs 3.0%; P = .001). However, there were no longer differences in stroke (3.2% vs 4.6%; P = .10) or SDM (6.3% vs 7.8%; P = .18). Within the matched cohort, predictors of SDM included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2; P = .01), congestive heart failure (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5; P = .01), and symptomatic carotid disease (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.03-2.1; P = .03). CCAB was not significant (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.8; P = .18). ConclusionsIn patients with unrevascularized, clinically relevant coronary disease, CCAB reduces operative MI but increases risk of stroke and death. After risk adjustment, MI remains higher in ICEA, but differences in 30-day stroke and SDM between ICEA and CCAB are no longer appreciated. These data suggest that CEA risk undertaken in patients with unrevascularized coronary disease is not inconsequential, and outcomes are similar to those of CCAB.

Anomalous aortic origin of right and circumflex coronary arteries - procedural risks during combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting

Introduction. Anomalous aortic origin of the right and the circumflex coronary arteries presents extremely rare and potentially dangerous combination in patients scheduled for combined coronary bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement surgery. We report this illustrative case to emphasize the importance of meticulous diagnostic setup enabling the surgeon to anticipate and avoid numerous possible pitfalls. Case outline. A 74-year-old woman, with anterior-wall myocardial infarction and aortic valve stenosis, underwent successful combined coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement. Preoperative coronary angiography revealed unusually high take-off of the right main coronary trunk and anomalous origin and course of the circumflex coronary artery. Anatomy of both anomalous coronary arteries in the light of underlying surgical pathology necessitated a meticulous preparation and caution during successive phases of surgical treatment. Conclusion. Estimating potential procedural risk should be standard practice for each patient with known congenital coronary artery anomalies, regardless of the natural risk imposed by a particular anomaly. Preoperative evaluation of coronary circulation, with high surgical awareness and knowledge of different congenital coronary artery anomalies, should be a standard approach in cardiac surgical practice. This would add a predictive value for an actual procedural risk in cases of previously unrecognized anomalies.

Perioperative management of combined coronary bypass surgery and thyroidectomy

Significant swelling of the thyroid compromising the airway can be a challenging situation when combined thyroidectomy and cardiac surgery is planned. Induction, intubation, intraoperative management, and extubation require special attention in such cases.

Aortic valve replacement with and without combined coronary bypass grafts in very elderly patients: early and long-term results

The number of older patients being referred for aortic valve replacement with or without combined coronary bypass grafting (CABG) is increasing. The aim of this study was to evaluate operative risk factors, early and long-term results of isolated aortic valve and aortic valve replacement combined with CABG in octogenarians and nonagenarians. In the last 10 years, 285 very elderly patients who underwent aortic valve replacement either alone or in combination with coronary artery bypass grafts were retrospectively studied. The population was divided into two groups; isolated aortic valve replacement was performed in 188 patients (group A) and 97 patients had aortic valve replacement combined with coronary surgery (group B). The overall hospital mortality was 5.3%, without statistical difference between groups. The incidence of low-output syndrome was higher in group B (P = 0.0001). The multivariate analysis for hospital mortality showed that urgency status, ejection fraction (EF) <35%, intra-operative variables such as clamping time, need for intra aortic balloon pump and post-operative variables such as prolonged ventilation, dialysis, post-operative myocardial infarction and re-thoracotomy for bleeding were independent prognostic factors for hospital mortality. The mean follow-up time was 49.03 ± 19 months. Survival at one, three and five years was 97.1 ± 1.8%, 92.2 ± 2.2% and 82.4 ± 3.6% for group A and 97.2 ± 2.0%, 88.4 ± 2.7% and 75.6 ± 3.2% for group B (P = 0.62), respectively. Age, male gender, post-operative myocardial infarction, urgency status, dialysis, low EF, mean aortic gradient were risk factors for the impaired survival. In our experience, a careful pre-operative evaluation has yielded good surgical results even in older patients with different comorbidities. Associated coronary grafts slightly increase the surgical risk. The role of revascularization on long-term morbidity and mortality is still not clear. It is essential to compare the results of percutaneous and trans-apical aortic valve replacement with the literature results of conventional aortic valve replacement with and without CABG before it can be used as an alternative for very older patients.

Risk factors for stroke in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Objective: To determine predictors of stroke in patients undergoing first-time coronary bypass grafting, we prospectively collected data on 1631 consecutive patients. Methods: Patients with a history of stroke and/or central nervous system symptoms ( n = 134) and/or carotid bruits ( n = 95) underwent carotid Doppler evaluation. Stenosis greater than 70% was considered significant. Patients with symptomatic disease or asymptomatic bilateral disease were referred for combined coronary bypass and carotid endarterectomy ( n = 21). Patients with neurologic symptoms after the operation were assessed by a neurologist and underwent a computed tomographic scan. Events were classified as reversible transient ischemic attack, reversible ischemic neurologic deficit, or irreversible stroke. Results: There were 19 strokes (1.2%) and 20 deaths (1.2%) in this series. In patients with carotid screening, risk of stroke increased with severity of carotid disease and ranged from 0% in patients without stenosis, to 3.2% (1/31) in those with greater than 70% stenosis, and to 27.3% (6/22) in those with carotid occlusion. By stepwise logistic regression analysis six variables were identified as risk factors for stroke. The most important predictor was carotid occlusion with or without contralateral stenosis (odds ratio = 28, 95% confidence interval (8,105). In this group, four of five strokes occurred on the occluded side. Other risk factors were presence of ascending aortic disease at the time of surgery (odds ratio = 12.8, confidence interval 3,48), perioperative myocardial infarction (odds ratio = 8.2, confidence interval 2,33), poor left ventricular function (odds ratio = 4.6, confidence interval 1,19), peripheral vascular disease (odds ratio = 3.2, confidence interval 1,9), and age >60 years (odds ratio = 2.9, confidence interval 0.8,11). Conclusion: We conclude that risk factors for perioperative stroke in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting are multiple. Carotid scanning in patients with neurologic symptoms or carotid bruits can identify patients at increased risk. Patients with carotid occlusion are at high risk for stroke on the occluded side. (J T HORAC C ARDIOVASC S URG 1996;112:1250-9)

Combined Coronary Bypass Grafting and Mitral Valve Surgery: Early and Late Results

It is reported that the mortality rate for combined coronary bypass grafting and mitral valve replacement is greater than for either isolated operation. To evaluate the effects of various predicting factors we analyzed the results of 67 consecutive patients undergoing combined mvr and CABG. The mean age was 61.3 +/- 7 years. There were 55 males and 12 females and the mean follow-up was 59.4 +/- 7 months. The hospital mortality rate was 13.4% (9/67). Preoperative NYHA functional class (p<0.05), left-ventricular motion score (increased scores indicating impaired function, (p<0.05), and aortic cross-clamp time (p<0.05) were associated with hospital mortality. There was no significant relationship of age (>60), cause of mitral valve disease, severity of mitral regurgitation, number of grafts, or previous myocardial infarction with hospital mortality. There were 7 late deaths, and survival at five years was 76.1%. Although there was a trend for preoperative NYHA class and aortic cross-clamp time to be associated with late survival, the only factor significantly related to late survival was global wall-motion score (p<0.05). Severity of mitral regurgitation and cause of mitral valve disease have been reported as being related to late survival, but we have found no such relationship. Our results indicate that both hospital and late mortality are strongly correlated with preoperative left ventricular function.

Early and late results following combined coronary bypass surgery and mitral valve replacement.

To study the effect of various perioperative and operative variables, we analysed the results of 66 consecutive patients undergoing mitral valve replacement (MVR) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The mean age was 61.2 years (34 males and 32 females), the mean follow-up 54.71 +/- 7.8 months. The hospital mortality rate was 7.6% (5/66). New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (P < 0.01), left ventricular global wall motion score (increased scores indicating impaired function, P = 0.005) and cross-clamp time (P < 0.05) were associated with hospital mortality. There was no significant relationship of age (certainly up to the age of 70), cause of mitral valve disease, severity of mitral regurgitation, number of grafts, presence of angina, or previous myocardial infarction with hospital mortality. There were eight late deaths, survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 92.4%, 83.2% and 80.2%, respectively. Although there was a trend for pulmonary vascular resistance (P = 0.15), NYHA class (P = 0.18) and aortic cross-clamp time (P = 0.09) to be associated with late survival, the only factor significantly related to late survival was global wall motion score (P = 0.001), i.e. those with scores of more than 10. Severity of mitral regurgitation and cause of mitral valve disease have been reported as being related to late survival in patients undergoing combined CABG and MVR, but we have found no such relationship. Our results indicate that both hospital and late mortality after this operation are strongly correlated with left ventricular function.

Idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis: Results of coronary artery bypass alone and myectomy combined with coronary artery bypass

Twenty-one patients with combined coronary artery disease and idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis (IHSS) have had coronary artery bypass grafting alone (Group I, n = 7) or in combination with left ventricular septal myectomy (Group II, n = 14). Patients ranged in age from 46 to 73 years (mean 59 years). There were no operative deaths, but one Group I patient died 16 months after operation. Patients in Group I have had continuing symptoms after the operation, whereas Group II patients have had consistent relief of symptoms. Patients with documented IHSS and coronary atherosclerosis should undergo combined coronary bypass and septal myectomy if symptoms recur with medical management.