Combination Of MEK Inhibitors Research Articles

The Evaluation of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and BRAF/MEK Inhibitors in Different Therapy Lines for Metastatic Melanoma: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (nivo/ipi) combination therapy is highly effective in treating advanced melanoma, but serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are prevalent. The overall response rate (ORR) of the BRAF inhibitor plus MEK inhibitor (BRAFi/MEKi) combination therapy for BRAFV600-mutant advanced melanoma surpasses that of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the OS and PFS of BRAFi/MEKi combination therapy are inferior to those of ICIs. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 22 melanoma patients treated with nivo/ipi therapy and 13 patients treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib (enco/bini) between November 2018 and July 2023. Results: The ORR of nivo/ipi for metastatic melanoma patients was significantly higher in the first-line cohort [60.0% (95% CI: 31.2-83.3%)] than in the second-line or beyond cohort [8.3% (95% CI: 0-37.5%)], whereas the ORR of enco/bini was comparable between the first-line cohort [75.0% (95% CI: 28.9-96.6%)] and the second-line or beyond cohort [77.8% (95% CI: 44.3-94.7%)]. The median PFS of nivo/ipi significantly improved in the first-line cohort [7.7 months (95% CI: 2.0-11.9)] compared to the second-line or beyond cohort [2.3 months (95% CI: 0.5-6.0)] (p = 0.0109). In addition to efficacy, the incidence of grade 3 or greater AEs was comparable in the first-line and second-line or beyond cohorts. Conclusions: Although our present data are based on a small number of cases, they suggest that nivo/ipi should be administered as the first-line therapy for the treatment of BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma, rather than enco/bini, aligning with findings from previous clinical trials.

Abstract C023: PDAC tumors from patients treated with combination MEK and autophagy inhibition reveal a treatment sensitive epithelial subtype that is enriched in murine models

Abstract Combining MEK and autophagy inhibitors in preclinical PDAC mouse models resulted in tumor regressions and improved rodent survival. These findings provided the rationale for clinical investigation of this combination. The phase 1 MEKiAUTO trial evaluated combination cobimetinib, HCQ, with or without atezolizumab in 14 patients (pts) with KRAS-mutated pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The study was closed due to a lack of preliminary efficacy and poor tolerability; however, three patients experienced progression free survival (PFS) beyond 12 weeks (two with KRAS G12R , one with KRAS G12D ). Correlative analyses on twenty-one biopsies (8-paired FFPE and 6-paired fresh frozen specimens) with multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) demonstrated decreased phosphorylation of ERK and accumulation of p62 indicating a pharmacodynamic effect. Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) also confirmed MAPK pathway inhibition, with a decrease in pERK, and autophagy inhibition, with decreased autophagy signature score, within the tumor compartment of on-treatment biopsies compared to baseline. Single nucleus RNAseq with protein expression activity extrapolated using ARACNe (Algorithm for the Reconstruction of Accurate Cellular Networks) and VIPER (Virtual Inference of Protein-activity by Enriched Regulon) pipelines identified five distinct tumor subpopulations. Comparing prevalence of tumor clusters before and after treatment identified differential responses to treatment. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed that the most sensitive tumor cluster, tumor cluster 2, was enriched in autophagy and MAPK signaling. Pre- treatment frequency of tumor cluster 2 was higher in patients who experienced a clinical benefit and independently correlated with PFS. Among the non-tumor cell clusters identified, patients with clinical benefit also had increased immune cell infiltration. To explain the discordance in efficacy with this combination in preclinical models and humans, we interrogated the preclinical tumor model systems for tumor heterogeneity. Single cell RNA-Seq analysis of tumors from Kras LSL.G12D/+ ; p53 LSL.R172H/+ ; Pdx1-Cre tg/+ (KPC) mice treated with the combination confirmed presence of similar treatment-sensitive and treatment-resistant clusters, with the former being enriched for MAPK and autophagy signatures. Parallel analysis of cell lines previously shown to be sensitive to combination MEK and autophagy inhibition, including MiaPACA2 and PANC1, showed they were mostly enriched in the treatment-sensitive human cluster 2 phenotype but not treatment-resistant clusters. Our results suggest that some preclinical models may overrepresent subtypes which are sensitive to MEK and autophagy inhibitors and thus do not recapitulate the extent of intertumoral heterogeneity in human PDAC. Observed preclinical responses likely represented elimination of treatment-sensitive cluster(s), with the remaining clusters responsible for maintained resistance. Citation Format: Brian W Labadie, Aleksandar Z Obradovic, Sarah Sta Ana, Michael May, Naomi Sender, Isabelle V Ross, Monica Rodriguez-Mendez, Urszula Wasko, Lorenzo Tomassoni, Li Li, Manan Vij, Sinan Abuzaid, Julia Wulfkuhle, Winston Wong, Ilenia Pellicciotta, Benjamin Izar, Emanuel F Petricoin, Aik Choon Tan, Kenneth P Olive, Alex G Raufi, Gulam A Manji. PDAC tumors from patients treated with combination MEK and autophagy inhibition reveal a treatment sensitive epithelial subtype that is enriched in murine models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 15-18; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl_2):Abstract nr C023.

MEK inhibitors lead to PDGFR pathway upregulation and sensitize tumors to RAF dimer inhibitors in NF1-deficient malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST).

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a highly aggressive subtype of soft tissue sarcoma with a high propensity to metastasize and extremely limited treatment options. Loss of the RAS-GAP NF1 leads to sustained RAF/MEK/ERK signaling in MPNST. However, single-agent MEK inhibitors (MEKi) have failed to elicit a sustained inhibition of the MAPK signaling pathway in MPNST. We employed pharmacological, biochemical, and genetic perturbations of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and MAPK signaling pathway regulators to investigate the mechanisms of MEKi resistance and evaluated combination therapeutic strategies in various preclinical MPNST models in vitro and in vivo. Here, we report that MEKi treatment resistance in MPNST involves two adaptive pathways: direct transcriptional upregulation of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) PDGFRβ, and MEKi-induced increase in RAF dimer formation and activation of downstream signaling. While the pharmacological combination of MEKi with a PDGFRβ specific inhibitor was more effective than treatment with MEKi alone, the combination of MEKi and RAF-dimer inhibitors led to a robust inhibition of the MAPK pathway signaling. This combination treatment was effective in vitro and in vivo, as demonstrated by the significant increase in drug synergism and its high effectiveness in decreasing MPNST viability. Our findings suggest that the combination of MEKi and PDGFR and/or RAF dimer inhibitors can overcome MEKi resistance and may serve as a novel targeted therapeutic strategy for NF1-deficient MPNST patients, which in turn could impact future clinical investigations for this patient population.

Class Effect Unveiled: PPARγ Agonists and MEK Inhibitors in Cancer Cell Differentiation.

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a major role in breast cancer progression and the development of drug resistance. We have previously demonstrated a trans-differentiation therapeutic approach targeting invasive dedifferentiated cancer cells. Using a combination of PPARγ agonists and MEK inhibitors, we forced the differentiation of disseminating breast cancer cells into post-mitotic adipocytes. Utilizing murine breast cancer cells, we demonstrated a broad class effect of PPARγ agonists and MEK inhibitors in inducing cancer cell trans-differentiation into adipocytes. Both Rosiglitazone and Pioglitazone effectively induced adipogenesis in cancer cells, marked by PPARγ and C/EBPα upregulation, cytoskeleton rearrangement, and lipid droplet accumulation. All tested MEK inhibitors promoted adipogenesis in the presence of TGFβ, with Cobimetinib showing the most prominent effects. A metastasis ex vivo culture from a patient diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer demonstrated a synergistic upregulation of PPARγ with the combination of Pioglitazone and Cobimetinib. Our results highlight the potential for new therapeutic strategies targeting cancer cell plasticity and the dedifferentiation phenotype in aggressive breast cancer subtypes. Combining differentiation treatments with standard therapeutic approaches may offer a strategy to overcome drug resistance.

Marmoset and human trophoblast stem cells differ in signaling requirements and recapitulate divergent modes of trophoblast invasion

Early human trophoblast development has remained elusive due to the inaccessibility of the early conceptus. Non-human primate models recapitulate many features of human development and allow access to early postimplantation stages. Here, we tracked the pre- to postimplantation transition of the trophoblast lineage in superficially implanting marmoset embryos invivo. We differentiated marmoset naive pluripotent stem cells into trophoblast stem cells (TSCs), which exhibited trophoblast-specific transcriptome, methylome, differentiation potential, and long-term self-renewal. Notably, human TSC culture conditions failed to support marmoset TSC derivation, instead inducing an extraembryonic mesoderm-like fate in marmoset cells. We show that combined MEK, TGF-β/NODAL, and histone deacetylase inhibition stabilizes a periimplantation trophoblast-like identity in marmoset TSCs. By contrast, these conditions differentiated human TSCs toward extravillous trophoblasts. Our work presents a paradigm to harness the evolutionary divergence in implantation strategies to elucidate human trophoblast development and invasion.

52402 Neurologic adverse events associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitor combination therapy: A disproportionality analysis using the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS)

52402 Neurologic adverse events associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitor combination therapy: A disproportionality analysis using the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS)

Tretinoin synergistically enhances the antitumor effect of combined BRAF, MEK, and EGFR inhibition in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer.

Patients with BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer (BRAFV600E CRC) are currently treated with a combination of BRAF inhibitor and anti-EGFR antibody with or without MEK inhibitor. A fundamental problem in treating patients with BRAFV600E CRC is intrinsic and/or acquired resistance to this combination therapy. By screening 78 compounds, we identified tretinoin, a retinoid, as a compound that synergistically enhances the antiproliferative effect of a combination of BRAF inhibition and MEK inhibition with or without EGFR inhibition on BRAFV600E CRC cells. This synergistic effect was also exerted by other retinoids. Tretinoin, added to BRAF inhibitor and MEK inhibitor, upregulated PARP, BAK, and p-H2AX. When either RARα or RXRα was silenced, the increase in cleaved PARP expression by the addition of TRE to ENC/BIN or ENC/BIN/CET was canceled. Our results suggest that the mechanism of the synergistic antiproliferative effect involves modulation of the Bcl-2 family and the DNA damage response that affects apoptotic pathways, and this synergistic effect is induced by RARα- or RXRα-mediated apoptosis. Tretinoin also enhanced the antitumor effect of a combination of the BRAF inhibitor and anti-EGFR antibody with or without MEK inhibitor in a BRAFV600E CRC xenograft mouse model. Our data provide a rationale for developing retinoids as a new combination agent to overcome resistance to the combination therapy for patients with BRAFV600E CRC.

Reshaping the Tumor Microenvironment of KRASG12D Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Combined SOS1 and MEK Inhibition for Improved Immunotherapy Response.

Combination of SOS1 and MEK inhibitors increase T cell infiltration while blunting pro-immune myeloid cell maturation and highlights the need for combining KRAS cancer-targeted therapy with myeloid activation to enhance and prolong anti-tumor effects.

BIOM-03. IMMUNO-ONCOLOGIC PROFILING OF PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS REVEALS MAJOR CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TUMOR IMMUNE MICROENVIRONMENT

Abstract With the success of immunotherapy in cancer, understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) has become increasingly important; however in pediatric brain tumors this remains poorly characterized. Accordingly, we developed a clinical immune-oncology gene expression assay, including the 18-gene tumor inflammation signature (TIS) as a marker of overall immune activation, and validated this with immunohistochemistry for key cell-type markers. We used this assay, in conjunction with public data from the Pediatric Brain Tumor Atlas (PBTA), to profile a diverse range of 1382 samples in total with detailed clinical and molecular annotation. Overall among the main types of pediatric brain tumors, low-grade gliomas (LGG) had the highest inflammation levels (regardless of genetic driver alteration) and medulloblastomas the lowest. In LGG we identified three distinct patterns of immune activation with prognostic significance in BRAF V600E-mutant tumors, specifically that higher inflammation predicted worse outcomes. In high-grade gliomas (HGG), we observed immune activation and T-cell infiltrates in tumors that have historically been considered exclusively immune cold. There were genomic correlates of inflammation levels, with BRAF-V600E-mutant HGG having the highest inflammation levels and suggesting these may be candidates for combination MEK inhibition and immunotherapy. In mismatch repair deficient HGG, we found that high TIS was a significant predictor of response to immune checkpoint inhibition, and demonstrated the potential for multimodal biomarkers (TIS plus tumor mutation burden) to improve treatment stratification. Importantly, while overall patterns of immune activation were observed for histologically and genetically defined tumor types, there was significant variability within each entity, indicating that the TIME must be evaluated as an independent feature from diagnosis. In sum, in addition to the histology and molecular profile, this work underscores the importance of reporting on the TIME as an essential axis of cancer diagnosis in the era of personalized medicine.

4EBP1-mediated SLC7A11 protein synthesis restrains ferroptosis triggered by MEK inhibitors in advanced ovarian cancer.

Loss of ferroptosis contributes to the development of human cancer, and restoration of ferroptosis has been demonstrated as a potential therapeutic strategy in cancer treatment. However, the mechanisms of how ferroptosis escape contributes to ovarian cancer (OV) development are not well elucidated. Here, we show that ferroptosis negative regulation signatures correlated with the tumorigenesis of OV and were associated with poor prognosis, suggesting that restoration of ferroptosis represents a potential therapeutic strategy in OV. High-throughput drug screening with a kinase inhibitor library identified MEK inhibitors as ferroptosis inducers in OV cells. We further demonstrated that MEK inhibitor-resistant OV cells were less vulnerable to trametinib-induced ferroptosis. Mechanistically, mTOR/eIF4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1) signaling promoted solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11) protein synthesis, leading to ferroptosis inhibition in MEK inhibitor-resistant cells. Dual inhibition of MEK and mTOR/4EBP1 signaling restrained the protein synthesis of SLC7A11 via suppression of the mTOR/4EBP1 axis to reactivate ferroptosis in resistant cells. Together, these findings provide a promising therapeutic option for OV treatment through ferroptosis restoration by the combined inhibition of MEK and mTOR/4EBP1 pathways.

A randomized phase 2 study of combination atezolizumab and varlilumab (CDX-1127) with or without addition of cobimetinib in previously treated unresectable biliary tract cancer.

4017 Background: Combined MEK inhibition (MEKi) and PD-L1 blockade significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus PD-L1 monotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) following first-line chemotherapy (NCT03201458). Further study has shown MEKi enhances tumor immunogenicity but impairs host T cell activation/priming. The addition of immune agonists, e.g. a CD27 agonist, can rescue T cell function in the setting of systemic MEKi in vivo and may be an effective strategy to optimize MEKi’s immunomodulatory potential when used in combination with checkpoint blockade. Methods: We conducted a randomized ph 2 trial (NCT04941287) evaluating Atezolizumab in combination with the CD27 immune agonist (CDX-1127 [Varlilumab]) with or without the addition of a MEKi (Cobimetinib) in patients with unresectable, previously treated, BTC. Adults with pathologically-confirmed BTC, s/p at least 1 prior line (no more than 2) of systemic therapy, measurable disease, and ECOG PS ≤1 were enrolled. Patients who had received previous PD-[L]1 were eligible. The study was planned for 64 evaluable subjects randomized in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by BTC site, to either AV (Atezolizumab [840mg IV days 1,15])+ Varlilumab [3mg/kg IV days 1, 15]) or CAV (Cobimetinib [60mg oral daily days 1-21, off 22-28] + Atezolizumab + Varlilumab). Overall response rate (ORR) and PFS were co-primary endpoints. The primary correlative outcome was treatment-related changes in CD8+ infiltrating T cells. Results: A preplanned interim analysis based on objective response rates did not meet the threshold for continuance in either treatment arm, so the trial was closed early for futility. In total, 57 patients were enrolled (n = 29 [CAV], n = 28 [AV], 67% had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 33% had received previous PD-[L]1. Both CAV and AV regimens were well-tolerated without new safety signals. Adding CDX-1127 did not appear to meaningful increase immunotoxicity beyond established PD-L1 toxicity profiles. ORR was 0% (CAV) and 4% (AV). With a median follow up time of 6.2 months, median PFS was 2.2 (CAV) and 1.8 (AV) months (HR 0.71 [0.40,1.25]). In PD[L]1-experienced patients, median PFS was 3.6 (CAV) and 1.7 (AV) months (HR 0.44 [0.14,1.33]). Median OS was 10.2 (CAV) and 6.1 (AV) months (HR 0.76 [0.37,1.55]). In PD[L]1-experienced patients, median OS was 6.4 (CAV) and 4.4 (AV) months for CAV and AV (HR 0.68 [0.19,2.42]). Primary correlative endpoint and updated survival will be reported at time of meeting. Conclusions: The combination of Atezolizumab and Varlilumab with or without Cobimetinib was safe but did not improve clinical outcomes in advanced stage BTC patients treated in later lines. Though not statistically significant, treatment with CAV demonstrated numerically favorable PFS/OS compared AV among immunotherapy-experienced patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03201458 .

Nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (modified) in combination with oral cobimetinib and encorafenib following FOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic G12D and G12V pancreatic cancer.

e16330 Background: Pancreatic cancer is the only human cancer in which most of the tumors are KRAS mutated. A majority of the mutations occur in codon 12. Mutations percentages are as follows: G12D (50%), G12V (35%) and G12R(12%). We are reporting on a pilot study in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who have failed, or have become resistant to FOLFIRINOX. Thereafter the patients were placed on Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine in combination with oral Cobimetinib and encorafenib. Methods: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancers are typically offered modified FOLFIRINOX followed by Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine. After obtaining a written informed consent, we conducted a single arm study of patients with pathologic proven unresectable metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients who had failed FOLFRINOX were placed on a modified regimen of Gemcitabine (1000mg/m2) and Nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/M2) on days 1 and 15 every 28-day cycle. Oral medications, Cobimetinib 20 mg bid and encorafenib of 150 mg bid were given. The oral chemotherapies were administered weekdays only during the 28-day cycle. The primary end point was to determine the response rate from the time the patients were placed on Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine and the oral medication. The secondary endpoint was to assess the overall survivorship from the beginning of the therapy, and overall toxicities of the combination therapy. Twelve patients with advanced metastatic pancreatic cancer were enrolled on this pilot study. Six patients were male, and the median age was 67 years. Liver metastases were present in eight patients. Treatment was continued as long as there was no disease progression. CBC, CMP, CA19-9 was performed every other week. CT and PET scan was ordered every eight weeks. Results: Overall follow up is from 5 to 19 months (median 14 months). Segmental median survival from the start of oral therapy in conjunction with Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine is 5 months (2-9 months). As from now,all patients are alive and 10 of 12 patients are on therapy. One patient who achieved pathologic response in the liver was deemed operable, and pathologically the distal pancreatectomy demonstrated NO disease. The other patient has progressed and is not on treatment. Grade 3 non-hematological toxicities included nausea, vomiting and fatigue in 3 of 12 patients. Hematological toxicities included neutropenia and neutrophil support was needed in 6 out of 12 patients. Median survivorship has NOT been reached. In this small study, we have observed a rapid and dramatic reduction in tumor volume. Conclusions: The combination of MEK and BRAF inhibitors with chemotherapy may be potentially active in pancreatic tumors (G12D and G12V). Based on the data presented, Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine in combination with oral Cobimetinib and encorafenib needs to be further explored in a larger cohort of patients.

CD44 and CD271 expression and chemoresistance in BRAF V600E/K mutation–positive melanoma.

e21542 Background: Melanoma stem cells (MSC) are thought to play a role in cellular proliferation, migration, and chemotherapeutic resistance. We investigated native expression of several putative MSC biomarkers in human BRAF V600E/K mutation positive melanoma cell lines of different phases—radial growth phase (WM35), vertical growth phase (WM278)—and metastatic (LM-Mel-45, LM-Mel-71) cell lines. We examined cell viability of select cell subpopulations during in vitro treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitor monotherapy and combination therapy. Methods: Using flow cytometry, we assessed surface expression of putative MSC biomarkers: CD44, CD271, CD133, CD186, and CD20. We sorted each cell line by CD44 and CD271 expression with a predetermined hierarchical gating strategy and compared 4 chemotherapy conditions: control, BRAF inhibition with 1.25 µM dabrafenib, MEK inhibition with 0.125 µM trametinib, and combination therapy. Cells (25,000) were collected directly into chemotherapy treated media and incubated for 72 hours. Cell viability was measured by MTT assay. Statistical analysis used mixed-effects ANOVA and Tukey HSD. Results: No significant expression of CD133, CD186, or CD20 was found in any cell line. Over 99% of live cells were CD44+ in all 4 cell lines. Only WM35 and LM-Mel-71 had both CD44+/CD271+ and CD44+/CD271- subpopulations. CD271 expression was restricted to CD44+ cells. Among live cells, the CD44+/CD271+ subpopulation was 31.2% for WM35 and 14.4% for LM-Mel-71. For WM35, cell viability in CD44+/CD271+ cells was greater than CD44+/CD271- cells for all treatments (p < 0.001). For LM-Mel-71 cells, CD271 expression did not affect cell viability within any treatment (p = 0.64). For chemotherapeutic treatments, cell viability in CD44+/CD271- subpopulation was higher in LM-Mel-45 cells than WM278 (p < 0.03) or LM-Mel-71 (p < 0.002), but not WM35 cells (p > 0.05). Trametinib monotherapy and combination therapy had similar cell viability in all 4 cell lines (p > 0.05). Conclusions: To our knowledge, our study is the first to show differences in phenotypic expression of CD44 and CD271 across nonmetastatic and metastatic melanoma cell lines and suggests co-expression of CD44 and CD271 confers increased chemotherapeutic resistance to in vitro BRAF and MEK inhibitor treatment in radial growth phase but not metastatic melanoma. More research is needed to better understand the role of CD44 and CD271 co-expression in melanoma initiation, progression, and chemotherapeutic resistance. CD271 remains a potential immunotherapeutic drug target in the treatment of BRAF V600E/K mutation positive melanoma.

A Practical Review of Encorafenib and Binimetinib Therapy Management in Patients with BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

According to current guidelines, targeted therapy with a combination of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors is the preferred first-line treatment for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the open-label, single-arm, phase2 PHAROS trial (NCT03915951), the combination of encorafenib, a potent BRAF inhibitor, and binimetinib, a potent MEK inhibitor, demonstrated durable antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in this patient population. On the basis of the results of this study, the combination of encorafenib plus binimetinib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on October 11, 2023, for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC. In this review, we summarize the efficacy and safety of encorafenib plus binimetinib from the PHAROS study. In addition, we discuss strategies to manage adverse reactions with this combination therapy with the intent of minimizing unnecessary treatment discontinuations in these patients.

Targeted therapy in BRAFmutated aggressive papillary craniopharyngioma: a case report and overview of the literature.

Papillary craniopharyngiomas harbor the BRAF V600E mutation, which paves the way for using BRAF inhibitor molecules to treat tumors refractory to standard therapies. Single case reports confirmed the efficacy of targeted therapy. However, most reports were limited by the short follow-up. We describe the long-term course of a patient treated with dual-agent BRAF and MEK inhibitors and review the available literature. A 75-year-old male patient had recurrence of a papillary craniopharyngioma after transsphenoidal surgery and Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Review of the pathologic specimen confirmed the presence of the BRAF V600E mutation. Because of the few therapeutic options, we decided to initiate BRAF/MEK inhibitor combined therapy for six months. Rapid reduction of the tumor occurred, but three months after quitting combined medical therapy the tumor recurred. BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy was resumed and the tumor again showed a marked reduction. The second course was maintained for 20months and the tumor showed another recurrence within three months, which, again, responded to a third course of targeted therapy. Our study confirms the excellent response of papillary craniopharyngioma to combined BRAF and MEK inhibitors. However, rapid tumor recurrence is the rule when medical therapy is stopped. Resistance to a second and third course of targeted therapy did not occur, suggesting that tumor mutations affecting the response to drugs seems an uncommon event in papillary craniopharyngioma. The exact role of targeted therapy in the treatment algorithm of papillary craniopharyngiomas has still to be refined.

Adhesion GPCR ADGRE2 Maintains Proteostasis to Promote Progression in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive and heterogeneous hematologic malignancy. In elderly patients, AML incidence is high and has a poor prognosis due to a lack of effective therapies. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) play integral roles in physiologic processes and human diseases. Particularly, one third of adhesion GPCRs, the second largest group of GPCRs, are highly expressed in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells or lineage cells. Here, we investigate the role of adhesion GPCRs in AML and whether they could be harnessed as antileukemia targets. Systematic screening of the impact of adhesion GPCRs on AML functionality by bioinformatic and functional analyses revealed high expression of ADGRE2 in AML, particularly in leukemic stem cells, which is associated with poor patient outcomes. Silencing ADGRE2 not only exerts antileukemic effects in AML cell lines and cells derived from patients with AML in vitro, but also delays AML progression in xenograft models in vivo. Mechanistically, ADGRE2 activates phospholipase Cβ/protein kinase C/MEK/ERK signaling to enhance the expression of AP1 and transcriptionally drive the expression of DUSP1, a protein phosphatase. DUSP1 dephosphorylates Ser16 in the J-domain of the co-chaperone DNAJB1, which facilitates the DNAJB1-HSP70 interaction and maintenance of proteostasis in AML. Finally, combined inhibition of MEK, AP1, and DUSP1 exhibits robust therapeutic efficacy in AML xenograft mouse models. Collectively, this study deciphers the roles and mechanisms of ADGRE2 in AML and provides a promising therapeutic strategy for treating AML. Significance: Increased expression of the adhesion GPCR member ADGRE2 in AML supports leukemia stem cell self-renewal and leukemogenesis by modulating proteostasis via an MEK/AP1/DUSP1 axis, which can be targeted to suppress AML progression.

Successful treatment of pediatric patients with high-grade gliomas featuring leptomeningeal metastases by targeting BRAF V600E mutations with dabrafenib plus trametinib: two illustrative cases.

A combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors is reported to be effective for gliomas with the BRAF V600E mutation; however, its efficacy in gliomas with leptomeningeal metastases (LMM) is still unknown. In this report, we describe two pediatric patients with high-grade glioma featuring the BRAF V600E mutation who were treated with dabrafenib and trametinib for LMM. Both 2 cases underwent craniotomy for primary intracranial lesions and were diagnosed as a high-grade glioma with BRAF V600E mutation; one case was consistent with anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastorocytoma, the other was epithelioid glioblastoma. They received standard treatment for the lesions but subsequently were found to have new lesions including multiple spinal dissemination. We started administering dabrafenib and trametinib. Within a few days of starting treatment, the symptoms improved dramatically and MRI performed one month after the prescription of the two drugs demonstrated remission of both brain and spinal lesions. This report shows that dabrafenib and trametinib are effective not only for recurrent lesions but also for LMM in pediatric patients.

Genetics-guided therapy in neuroendocrine carcinoma: response to BRAF- and MEK-inhibitors.

Metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is associated with short survival. Other than platinum-based chemotherapy, there is no clear standard regimen. Current guidelines suggest that combination treatment with BRAF-inhibitors should be considered for patients with BRAF V600E-mutated NEC. However, since only eight such patients have been reported in the literature, our object was to confirm the validity of this recommendation. This was a single-center retrospective cohort study conducted at Uppsala University Hospital. The included patients 1) had a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of NEC, 2) were diagnosed between January 1st, 2018 and December 31st, 2023, 3) had tumor tissue genetically screened by a broad next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, and 4) showed a tumor mutation for which there is a currently available targeted therapy. We screened 48 patients diagnosed with NEC between January 1st, 2018 and December 31st, 2023. Twelve had been analyzed with a broad NGS-panel, and two had a targetable mutation. Both these patients harbored a BRAF V600E-mutated colon-NEC and were treated with BRAF- and MEK-inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib in second-line. At first radiological evaluation (RECIST 1.1), both patients had a reduction of tumor size, which decreased by 31 and 40%. Both had short response periods, and their overall survival was 12 and 9 months. BRAF-mutated NEC is sensitive to treatment with BRAF- and MEK-inhibitor combination. These results further support that DNA sequencing should be considered as standard of care in NECs to screen for potential treatment targets.

Abstract 3864: Role of NK/TAM cross-talk on T-CD8+ recruitment and efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy and MEKi combination in "cold" tumors

Abstract In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), double platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin and pemetrexed) combined with the anti-PD-1 antibody has shown significant clinical benefit and has become the standard of care. In the context of so-called "cold" tumors, the immunogenic capacities of chemotherapies increase danger signals (type I IFNs, CXCL9/10) and favor both infiltration of NK/T-CD8+ cells and response to anti-PD-1. Despite the therapeutic progress represented by this new combination, some patients have limited benefit from chemo-immunotherapy, suggesting that in these patients, the immunogenic capacities of chemotherapy are limited. Recently, we were able to show that KRAS oncogene signaling restricts the ability of the cisplatin/pemetrexed doublet to induce the chemokine CXCL10, lymphocyte recruitment and sensitize to PD-L1 blockade. Thus, the addition of a MEK inhibitor (MEKi) to the chemo-immunotherapy combination restores an immunogenic signal through CXCL10, enabling T-CD8+ to infiltrate the tumor more extensively, making it more sensitive to immunotherapy. Here, we unravel the essential role of NK cells in the immunological and antitumoral effect of chemo-immunotherapy plus MEKi combination in the LLC1 preclinical lung cancer model. We showed that chemo/MEKi combination favors NK cell recruitment and activation in tumor bed through both CXCL10 and NKG2D-ligand (Rae1, Mult1). Then, IFNγ-producing NK cells trigger tumor associated macrophage switch from M2 toward M1 phenotype and amplify T-CD8+ cells recruitment through CXCL9 production by macrophages. Thus, NK cell depletion, CXCR3, CXCL9 or NKG2D-neutralization restrained chemo/MEKi therapeutic efficacy. However, IFNγ also triggers NKG2A-ligand expression (Qa-1b, HLA-E in human) which restrained NK cell activation and CD8+ T cell recruitment. Thus reducing the NKG2A pathway, by using Qa-1b-/- LLC1 cells, enhances chemo-immunotherapy/MEKi anti-tumor efficacy. Similar results were obtained in preclinical “cold” CT26 colon cancer model treated by chemo-immunotherapy. Our results underline a new role for NK cell activation to trigger TAM2/TAM1 switch, CXCL9 expression and amplify CD8 T cell recruitment in “cold” tumor. In a context of resistance to chemo-immunotherapy, MEKi or ICI targeting NK cells could be an interesting way to amplify the anti-tumor immune response by modulating both TAMs biology and the recruitment of CD8+ T cells. Citation Format: Lisa Nuttin, Charlène Latour, Solène Revy, Romain Aucagne, Guilhem Lalle, François Ghiringhelli, Emeric Limagne. Role of NK/TAM cross-talk on T-CD8+ recruitment and efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy and MEKi combination in "cold" tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3864.

Abstract 4652: Combined inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK reduces tumor growth in a triple-negative/inflammatory breast cancer, MEK-resistant xenograft mouse model

Abstract Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) are highly aggressive subtypes of invasive breast cancer. Our previous work showed that the MEK inhibitor (MEKi) selumetinib (AZD6244) prevents lung metastasis in a xenograft model. However, clinical studies have shown that MEKi’s as single agents have only modest activity against solid tumors. Using a genome-wide synthetic lethal siRNA screening, we identified myeloid cell leukemia-1 (MCL1) as a potential contributor to selumetinib resistance. MCL-1 is an anti-apoptotic protein associated with cell immortalization, transformation, and chemoresistance in numerous cancers. We hypothesized that MCL-1 promotes MEKi resistance in TNBC/IBC and inhibition of MCL-1 in the presence of AZD6244 overcomes this MEKi resistance. Methods & Results: To understand MCL1’s role in MEKi resistance, we established two AZD6244 -resistant TNBC/IBC cell lines: MDA-MB-231-R and SUM149-R. These cells showed increased cell viability, colony formation, migration, cells in G1 phase, CD44+CD24low, mammosphere count, anchorage-independent growth and high MCL-1 expression. MCL-1’s biological role was evaluated by transient and stably knock down (KD) of MCL-1 in the resistant cells which showed decreased cell viability, colony formation, and increased apoptosis. To understand the mechanism mediating apoptosis, we examined the expression of MCL-1’s binding partners in the MCL-1-KD-R cells in the presence of AZD6244. These cells showed a high expression of the PUMA, NOXA, BAK, and BAX in the presence of AZD6244. Further, we treated resistant cells with MEKi AZD6244 and an MCL-1i (AZD5991) that confirmed restoration of MEK sensitivity in both resistant cell lines, resulting in decreased cell viability, colony formation and increased apoptosis. We compared tumor formation capability between SUM149 parental and SUM149 resistant cells by injecting them in nu/nu mice and observed a time-dependent increase (avg. 4-fold) in tumor growth with SUM149-R cells compared to parental cells (P≤0.0001). Moreover, IHC analysis showed high expression of MCL-1 (P≤0.01), Ki67 (ns), CD44 (P≤0.0001), and ALDHA1 (P≤0.0001) in the mammary gland tumor tissues of SUM149-R-injected mice compared to SUM149-P-injected mice. Next, we evaluated the therapeutic effect of AZD6244 in mice harboring SUM149-R - MCL-1-deficient tumors. AZD6244 treatment significantly reduced tumor development in mice harboring SUM149-R - MCL-1-KD tumors compared to control mice (P<0.0001), suggesting that MCL-1 mediates MEK resistance in triple-negative/inflammatory breast cancer. Conclusion: Our results suggest that MCL-1 is important for inducing acquired MEK resistance and combining an MCL-1i with a MEKi could improve treatment outcomes of patients with TNBC or IBC who have developed resistance to single-agent MEKi. Citation Format: Mohd Mughees, Alex Tan, Lakesla Iles, Michael White, Debu Tripathy, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Jian Wang, Wendy A. Woodward, Geoffrey Bartholomeusz, Chandra Bartholomeusz. Combined inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK reduces tumor growth in a triple-negative/inflammatory breast cancer, MEK-resistant xenograft mouse model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4652.