Combination Therapy In Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Research Articles

Current Status of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Combined Study Results and Pharmacology-Based Review.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) affects a wide range of people globally and has a poor prognosis despite many advancements in available treatment options. Among the available treatments, endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) are among the most widely used drugs. These drugs have been evaluated in scientific trials. We included free full texts in the English language from the last ten years and reviewed them. We are writing this review to amalgamate the pharmacological aspects and the previous studies on ERAs to demonstrate a comprehensive overview of the current status of ERAs for PAH treatment. We focused on the structure, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy and safety of the three most widely used ERAs: Bosentan, Ambrisentan, and Macitentan. These drugs have different receptor affinities, bioavailability, excretion routes, and different levels of safety profiles. There are three available studies, the RCT, the ARIES series, and the SERAPHIN studies, for assessing the safety and efficacy of Bosentan, Ambrisentan, and Macitentan, respectively. All the studies and some additional studies for combination therapy have proven all three drugs effective in treating PAH. The side effects (SE) varied from headache and hepatic enzyme elevation to worsening the PAH status of varied severities. Although these studies provided valuable insight into the role of ERAs, there is still enough scope for more studies on ERAs, both as monotherapy and combination therapy for PAH.

Drug Interactions Associated With Therapies for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Objective: To evaluate the potential for drug interactions with therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Treatments include calcium channel blockers, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, endothelin receptor antagonists, guanylate cyclase stimulators, prostacyclin analogues, and prostacyclin receptor agonists. Data Sources: A systemic literature search (January 1980-December 2021) was performed using PubMed and EBSCO to locate relevant articles. The mesh terms used included each specific medication available as well as "drug interactions." DAILYMED was used for product-specific drug interactions. Study Selection and Data Extraction: The search was conducted to identify drug interactions with PAH treatments. The search was limited to those articles studying human applications with PAH treatments and publications using the English language. Case reports, clinical trials, review articles, treatment guidelines, and package labeling were selected for inclusion. Data Synthesis: Primary literature and package labeling indicate that PAH treatments are subject to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. The management of PAH is rapidly evolving. As more and more evidence becomes available for the use of combination therapy in PAH, the increasing use of combination therapy increases the risk of drug-drug interactions. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is also associated with other comorbidities that require concomitant pharmacotherapy. Conclusion: The available literature indicates that PAH therapies are associated with clinically significant drug interactions and the potential for subsequent adverse reactions. Clinicians in all practice settings should be mindful that increased awareness of drug interactions with PAH therapy will ensure optimal management and patient safety.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate sildenafil, ambrisentan combination therapy in pulmonary hypertension, particularly of Eisenmenger syndrome

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) - a complex and progressive disease that carries significant morbidity and mortality despite optimal medical treatment. Combination therapy for PAH can be more effective than monotherapy. The present randomized trial compared the safety and efficacy of sildenafil ambrisentan combination therapy with sildenafil monotherapy. Twenty-two patients of Eisenmenger syndrome and five patients of idiopathic PAH were randomized to two arms. There was a significant improvement in NYHA functional class and mean pulmonary artery pressure, while an insignificant improving trend was observed for 6-min walk distance and oxygen saturation, following the 12 weeks of combination therapy. An upfront combination therapy was found to be safe and effective in the management of PAH patients.

Combination Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Targeting the Nitric Oxide and Prostacyclin Pathways.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic and progressive disorder characterized by vascular remodeling of the small pulmonary arteries, resulting in elevated pulmonary vascular resistance and ultimately, right ventricular failure. Expanded understanding of PAH pathophysiology as it pertains to the nitric oxide (NO), prostacyclin (prostaglandin I2) (PGI2) and endothelin-1 pathways has led to recent advancements in targeted drug development and substantial improvements in morbidity and mortality. There are currently several classes of drugs available to target these pathways including phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i), soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulators, prostacyclin class agents and endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs). Combination therapy in PAH, either upfront or sequentially, has become a widely adopted treatment strategy, allowing for simultaneous targeting of more than one of these signaling pathways implicated in disease progression. Much of the current treatment landscape has focused on initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil, an ERA and PDE5I respectively, following results of the AMBITION study demonstrating combination to be superior to either agent alone as upfront therapy. Consequently, clinicians often consider combination therapy with other drugs and drug classes, as deemed clinically appropriate, for patients with PAH. An alternative regimen that targets the NO and PGI2 pathways has been adopted by some clinicians as an effective and sometimes preferred therapeutic combination for PAH. Although there is a paucity of prospective data, preclinical data and results from secondary data analysis of clinical studies targeting these pathways may provide novel insights into this alternative combination as a reasonable, and sometimes preferred, alternative approach to combination therapy in PAH. This review of preclinical and clinical data will discuss the current understanding of combination therapy that simultaneously targets the NO and PGI2 signaling pathways, highlighting the clinical advantages and theoretical biochemical interplay of these agents.

Clinical and hemodynamic benefit of macitentan and riociguat upfront combination in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

In this open-label study, we evaluated the effect of upfront macitentan and riociguat combination in newly diagnosed pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients. In 15 consecutive PAH patients, we collected clinical and hemodynamic data at baseline, visit 1 (median 4 months) and visit 2 (median 12 months). Survival and transplantation status were analyzed over 36 months. Statistical analysis included student t-test and 95% confidence interval (CI) (t-statistic or Clopper-Pearson). Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate survival rate. There were 11/15 women (mean age 56 years), in World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (FC) III (n = 14) or IV (n = 1). The 6 min walk distance increased from 281.6 m (baseline) to 315.7 m (visit 1) and visit 2 (313.9 m), representing a 34- and 32-m change (P < 0.05), respectively, associated with Borg score improvements. Brain natriuretic peptide decreased: 318.2 pg/mL (baseline) to 122.0 pg/mL (visit 1) and 98.6 pg/mL (visit 2) (P < 0.05). WHO FC improved in eight patients (53%, 95% CI 27%–79%). Pulmonary vascular resistance (9.2 to 5.7 Wood Units) and mean pulmonary artery pressure (47.3 to 38.9 mmHg) decreased; cardiac index increased (2.3 to 3.0 L/min/m2) (baseline to visit 2, all P < 0.05). All patients had intermediate and high risk score (baseline); at 1-year follow-up, dual therapy led to reduction to low risk score in 7/15 (47%) patients. There were no unexpected or serious side effects. Three patients died due to unrelated causes; one patient received a lung transplant. Transplant-free survival rate (36 months) was 85%. Preliminary evidence is provided for effectiveness of initial macitentan and riociguat combination therapy in PAH.

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Combination Therapy in Practice.

Combination therapy is now regarded as the standard of care in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and is becoming widely used in clinical practice. Given the inherent complexities of combining medications, there is a need for practical advice on implementing this treatment strategy in the clinic. Drawing on our experience and expertise, within this review, we discuss some of the challenges associated with administration of combination therapy in PAH and how these can be addressed in the clinic. Despite their differing modes of action, all of the currently available classes of PAH therapy induce systemic vasodilation. In initial combination therapy regimens in particular, this may lead to additive side effects and reduced tolerability compared with monotherapy. However, approaches such as staggered treatment initiation and careful up-titration may reduce the risk of additive side effects and have been used successfully in clinical practice, as well as in clinical trials and registry studies. When combination therapy regimens are initiated, it is important that patients are monitored regularly for the presence of any side effects and that these are then managed promptly and appropriately. For patients to attain the best outcomes, the treatment regimen must be tailored to the individual’s specific needs, including consideration of PAH etiology, the presence of comorbidities and concomitant medications beyond PAH therapy, and patient lifestyle and preference. It is also vital that individuals are managed at expert care centers, where multidisciplinary teams have a wealth of specialist experience in treating PAH patients. Adherence to therapy can be a concern in a chronic disease such as PAH, and as treatment regimens become increasingly complex, maintaining good treatment adherence may become more challenging. It is essential that patients are educated on the importance of treatment adherence, and this is a key role for the PAH nurse specialist. For patients who are managed carefully in expert centers with combination therapy regimens that are tailored to their specific needs, a favorable benefit–risk ratio can be achieved. With individual and carefully managed approaches, the excellent results observed with combination therapy in clinical trials can be obtained by patients in a real-world setting.

Early intervention in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: clinical and economic outcomes.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has a high morbidity rate and is fatal if left untreated. Increasing evidence supports early intervention, possibly with initial combination therapy. PAH-specific pharmaceuticals, however, are expensive and may have serious adverse effects, particularly when used in combination. The currently dynamic health care economy reinforces the need for a review of early intervention from both outcomes and economic perspectives. We aimed to review the clinical and economic impact of PAH therapy, particularly examining drug cost, hospitalization burden, and health care economics impact, and the effect of early intervention on clinical outcomes. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and MEDLINE databases from 2005 to 2017 for studies comparing drug cost, clinical outcomes, and hospitalization burden associated with therapy for PAH. Emerging data indicate that early therapy is effective, but drug therapy is expensive, particularly with combination therapy. Efficacy studies also generally show benefit of combination therapy for patients in World Health Organization functional class II, with a consistent decrease in hospitalization. Pharmacoeconomic studies are limited but indicate that increased pharmacy costs are at least partially offset by decreased health care utilization, particularly inpatient care. Modeling also shows a cost benefit with combination therapy at 2 years. Nonetheless, more rigorously collected health care economic data should be incorporated into future drug efficacy trials to provide a clearer understanding of the impact and the associated cost benefit of early PAH therapy. Increasing evidence in support of early intervention and combination therapy for PAH is associated with rising medication costs that are largely offset by reduced hospitalization, on the basis of the currently available literature. Nonetheless, the studies performed to date have methodologic limitations that highlight the need for prospective studies using more robust economic modeling.

Riociguat and sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension: similarity and difference

Last decades, several drugs for treatment of pulmonary hypertension have been implemented in clinical practice. Sildenafil selectively inhibits phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5), increases cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) level in the pulmonary vascular wall leading to vasodilation, inhibition of proliferation and other specific effects. Sildenafil is indicated as single therapy and in sequential combination therapy of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (high-level evidence, high-class recommendation). However, therapeutic response on PDE-5 inhibitors is insufficient in a certain number of patients. Soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) activators were proposed as a good alternative for such patients. Riociguat has dual mechanism of action: firstly, it is designed to increase cGMP biosynthesis via direct activation of sGC; this pathway resembles that of nitric oxide (NO) but is independent on NO. Secondly, riociguat can sensitise sGC to NO. Riociguat is indicated as single therapy and in sequential combination therapy of PAH and to treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (high-level evidence, high-class recommendation). A clinical trial RESPITE has been initiated in February, 2014, which is intended to evaluate efficacy of switching PAH patients from PDE-5 inhibitors to riociguat. Potential advantage of this drug is the mechanism independent of NO and of other PDE enzyme isoforms. Whether this advantage is clinically significant, remains to be seen, probably, in the RESPITE trial.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Drug Therapy for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background Current treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have been shown to improve dyspnea, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and pulmonary hemodynamics, but few studies were designed to compare treatment regimens or assess the impact of treatment on mortality. Methods We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of monotherapy or combination therapy for PAH using endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, or prostanoids. We searched English-language publications of comparative studies that reported intermediate or long-term outcomes associated with drug therapy for PAH. Two investigators abstracted data and rated study quality and applicability. Results We identified 28 randomized controlled trials involving 3,613 patients. We found no studies that randomized treatment-naive patients to monotherapy vs combination therapy. There was insufficient statistical power to detect a mortality difference associated with treatment. All drug classes demonstrated increases in 6MWD when compared with placebo, and combination therapy showed improved 6MWD compared with monotherapy. For hospitalization, the OR was lower in patients taking endothelin receptor antagonists or phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors compared with placebo (OR, 0.34 and 0.48, respectively). Conclusions Although no studies were powered to detect a mortality reduction, monotherapy was associated with improved 6MWD and reduced hospitalization rates. Our findings also suggest an improvement in 6MWD when a second drug is added to monotherapy. Current treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have been shown to improve dyspnea, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and pulmonary hemodynamics, but few studies were designed to compare treatment regimens or assess the impact of treatment on mortality. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of monotherapy or combination therapy for PAH using endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, or prostanoids. We searched English-language publications of comparative studies that reported intermediate or long-term outcomes associated with drug therapy for PAH. Two investigators abstracted data and rated study quality and applicability. We identified 28 randomized controlled trials involving 3,613 patients. We found no studies that randomized treatment-naive patients to monotherapy vs combination therapy. There was insufficient statistical power to detect a mortality difference associated with treatment. All drug classes demonstrated increases in 6MWD when compared with placebo, and combination therapy showed improved 6MWD compared with monotherapy. For hospitalization, the OR was lower in patients taking endothelin receptor antagonists or phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors compared with placebo (OR, 0.34 and 0.48, respectively). Although no studies were powered to detect a mortality reduction, monotherapy was associated with improved 6MWD and reduced hospitalization rates. Our findings also suggest an improvement in 6MWD when a second drug is added to monotherapy.

Combination therapy in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease without a cure, which can lead to right heart failure and death. Over the past decades, several therapeutic advances have been developed for the management of PAH. Although these agents have demonstrated clinical safety and efficacy, some patients may require additional drug therapy due to a lack of response or disease progression. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of various combination PAH therapies. A systematic search was conducted using the MEDLINE database (1966 and June 2012) for relevant clinical studies. Searches were limited to English, human and clinical trial using the terms sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, phosphodiesterase inhibitor, prostacyclin, prostaglandin, epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost, beraprost, endothelin receptor antagonist, bosentan, ambrisentan, sitaxsentan and pulmonary hypertension. Overall, 22 studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, the majority of trials demonstrated clinical efficacy in improving functional class, reducing pulmonary pressure, or increasing exercise capacity. Most trials were uncontrolled with small sample sizes investigating the acute effects of combination therapy and lacking long-term clinical outcomes. Adjunctive therapy was well tolerated by most patients. Overall, combination therapy is relatively safe and well tolerated. Published guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for monotherapy. However, suggestions for combination therapy in refractory PAH patients are lacking. Several studies evaluating several combination therapies have been published. The preferred combination treatment among several PAH drug therapies remain controversial. Therefore, clinicians should consider ease of administration, cost, and tolerability when choosing specific combination therapies. Combination therapy appears promising for patients who are refractory to treatment or whose disease progression is not well controlled with monotherapy. An optimal combination drug therapy regimen remains debatable and should be customized for individual PAH patients. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal combination therapy in PAH based upon efficacy, safety and cost.

Combination Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis

Objectives: It is unclear whether combination therapy is efficient and well tolerated in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The objective was to analyze completed trials assessing the efficacy and safety of treating PAH with combination therapy. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled combination therapy trials that evaluated efficacy and safety in PAH patients. Trials were identified in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and PubMed databases, reviews and reference lists of relevant papers. Results: Six trials with a total of 858 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, combination therapy reduced clinical worsening [relative risk (RR) 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26–0.91, p = 0.023], increased the 6-min-walk distance significantly by 22.22 m, and reduced mean pulmonary arterial pressure, right atrial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. The incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the 2 groups (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.40–3.42, p = 0.77). However, combination therapy did not influence mortality. Conclusions: Treatment of PAH with combination therapy improves multiple clinical and hemodynamic outcomes, but it has no effect on mortality. The long-term efficacy and safety of combination therapy in PAH requires further study based on large and rational-designed controlled clinical trials.

YC-1 attenuates hypoxia-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension in mice

Background Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and elevation of pulmonary arterial pressure, leading to right ventricular failure and eventual death. Currently, no curative therapy for PAH is available, and the overall prognosis is very poor. Recently, direct activators of soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) have been tested as a novel therapeutic modality in experimental models of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Objective In this study, we used in vitro and in vivo models to evaluate the therapeutic potential of 3-(5′-hydroxymethyl-2′-furyl)-1-benzylindazole (YC-1), a dual functioning chemical, as a direct activator of guanylyl cyclase and an inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor-1. Methods We analyzed the effects of YC-1 on cell proliferation and the levels of p21 and p53 in human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (HPASMCs) under hypoxia. We also determined the effects of YC-1 on expression of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and phosphorylation status of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) at Ser 1179 in human pulmonary artery endothelial cells (HPAECs) under hypoxia. In mice, hypoxic PAH was induced by exposure to normobaric hypoxic conditions for 28 days. To assess preventive or therapeutic effects, randomized mice were subjected to once daily i.p. injections of YC-1 for the entire hypoxic period (5 mg/kg) or for the last seven days of a 28-day hypoxic period (5 and 10 mg/kg). On day 28, we measured the right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) and determined the degrees of right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) and vascular remodeling. Results In HPASMCs, YC-1 inhibited hypoxia-induced proliferation and induction of p53 and p21 in a concentration-dependent manner. Also, YC-1 suppressed the hypoxia-induced expression of ET-1 mRNA and dephosphorylation of eNOS at Ser 1179 in HPAECs. In the preventive in vivo model, a daily dose of 5 mg/kg YC-1 significantly prevented the elevation of RVSP, development of RVH, and pulmonary vascular remodeling, which were caused by hypoxic exposure. In the therapeutic model, YC-1 at daily doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg alleviated RVH and pulmonary vascular remodeling but did not prevent the elevation of RVSP. Conclusions Our results indicate that YC-1 prevents the development of hypoxia-induced PAH in a preventive model and alleviates RVH and pulmonary vascular remodeling in a therapeutic model. Therefore, these data imply that YC-1 has therapeutic potential for use in a single or combination therapy for PAH.

Pulmonary Hypertension: Role of Combination Therapy

Over the past decade different effective treatment options for use in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have been developed. Due to multiple pathophysiological pathways in PAH and unsatisfactory overall results with the use of monotherapy in a substantial number of PAH patients, there is a pharmacological rationale for combination therapy. The currently approved substances target the prostacyclin, the endothelin and the NO (nitric oxide) -pathways. Those agents have shown a varying degree of improvement in different categories of PAH associated limitations like hemodynamics, exercise capacity, functional class, and quality of life. However, clinical worsening over time is still significant in most patients irrespective of the treatment utilized. The recently published ESC-ERS (European Society of Cardiology and European Respiratory Society) guidelines on pulmonary hypertension suggest the use of combination therapy in patients who do not respond adequately to monotherapy.This article reviews and critically discusses the available data on combination therapy in PAH.

Evidence for the use of combination targeted therapeutic approaches for the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension

The last decade has witnessed a remarkable increase in the number of effective treatment options available for the management of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. In this regard, agents belonging to the therapeutic classes that specifically target the prostacyclin, endothelin and nitric oxide pathways have shown the greatest efficacy in clinical studies to date. These various drug treatments have individually been shown to confer improvements in symptoms, exercise capacity, pulmonary haemodynamics and possibly survival in different patient subgroups. However, pulmonary arterial hypertension is characterised by dysregulation of a variety of pathways. In addition, disease worsening is inevitable for the majority of patients receiving monotherapy. As a consequence, there is increasing interest in the use of treatment combinations in order to target multiple targets with the aim of restoring normal pulmonary vascular function in order to improve clinical status. Indeed, use of multiple specific-treatment regimens is now part of routine clinical practice and is emphasized in recently published therapeutic guidelines. This review details the rationale for the different combination strategies and examines the clinical evidence in favour of some of the approaches that have been evaluated.

Role of Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

As a result of the multimechanistic pathology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), combination therapy is emerging as a potential treatment option. Recent guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians and expert consensus from the American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Heart Association do not definitively support or disapprove of combination pharmacotherapy for the treatment of PAH. Published trials have investigated different combinations including endothelin receptor antagonists with prostanoids, prostanoids with phosphodiesterase inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors with endothelin receptor antagonists. Pertinent trials on combination pharmacotherapy for PAH were identified through a MEDLINE search of literature from 1967-2009 in addition to a manual search of references from the articles retrieved. Search results identified 12 trials that evaluated combination therapy for PAH; some included an add-on agent for patients who failed treatment with monotherapy and others were placebo controlled. Even with the published data, the overall consensus is unclear. Well-designed, larger trials with validated end points are needed to further identify when to initiate combination therapy for the treatment of PAH. Meanwhile, perhaps the most appropriate situation for using combination pharmacotherapy may be in the setting of a lack of clinical improvement or deterioration.

The use of combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: new developments

There is a strong clinical rationale for combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), as several pathological pathways have been implicated in its pathogenesis and no single agent has yet been shown to deliver completely satisfactory results. Registry data indicate that use of combination therapy is in fact common in existing clinical practice, even though support has been largely empirical or derived from small-scale observational studies. Data from large, adequately powered, randomised controlled trials of combination therapy in PAH are now emerging and suggest that combination therapy may be clinically beneficial. Studies of bosentan in combination with prostanoids and phosphodiesterase (PDE)-5 inhibitors show consistent evidence of improvements in exercise capacity compared with placebo. Similar improvements have been observed with PDE-5 inhibitors in combination with prostanoids. The appropriate timing of combination therapy requires further evaluation but goal-oriented therapy using combinations of oral and inhaled drugs has been shown to provide acceptable long-term results in patients with advanced PAH. Monitoring should be performed regularly and be based on repeatable, noninvasive, measurable parameters that have prognostic value.

Drug Interactions in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Their Implications

Medical intervention is necessary in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in order to prevent chronic disease progression and clinical deterioration. Recent years have seen the development of new disease-specific drugs, such as endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs). However, there remains the potential for drug–drug interactions (DDIs), which can adversely affect drug metabolism and therefore treatment efficacy, an especially significant factor to consider in light of the increasing use of combination therapy in PAH and the ageing patient population who may also suffer age-related diseases requiring concomitant drug therapy. The ERA ambrisentan has demonstrated lower liver toxicity and fewer DDIs than other ERAs. The lack of any significant drug interactions with commonly used adjunct therapies such as warfarin or sildenafil could potentially improve treatment efficacy as well as patient safety.