Combination Therapy Cohorts Research Articles

Real-World Treatment Patterns in Drug Naïve Type 2 Diabetes Population: Initial Combination Therapy vs. Sequential Step-Therapy

BackgroundDespite evidence-based guidelines and available therapies, many patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have suboptimal glycemic control. The current standard of care suggests initial monotherapy followed by add-on therapy to achieve and maintain target HbA1c. However, clinical trials revealed that intensive glycemic control, especially at the early stages of the disease, could result in earlier and better long-term glycemic control in addition to reducing diabetes-related complications and mortality risk. ObjectivesThis population-based study aimed to investigate treatment initiation patterns among newly diagnosed drug-naïve patients with T2D in real-world clinical settings, focusing on two recommended approaches: initial combination therapy and step-therapy. MethodsA retrospective study was conducted using claims data from the Merative™ MarketScan® Research Databases between 2017 and 2019. The study included drug-naïve patients with T2D with continuous enrolment in medical and pharmacy plans. Patients were categorized into the initial combination therapy or step-therapy cohorts based on their initial treatment regimen. Baseline characteristics of the cohorts were recorded, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with receiving each approach. ResultsThe study included a total of 117,419 patients in the Commercial/Medicare population and 18,574 patients in the Medicaid population. About 10-12% of patients received initial combination therapy as their initial pharmacotherapy regimen. Several patient demographic and clinical characteristics were significantly associated with the use of initial combination therapy vs. step-therapy. Results also showed a greater usage of loose-dose combination pills over fixed-dose combinations. ConclusionsGiven the lack of real-world studies on combination vs. step-therapy, the study findings provide insights into the current treatment initiation patterns and associated factors among drug-naïve patients with T2D. These findings contribute to understanding the real-world clinical practices in diabetes management and may help guide clinicians in making informed decisions regarding pharmacotherapy approaches.

First-in-human phase 1 dose-escalation results with livmoniplimab, an antibody targeting the GARP:TGF-ß1 complex, as monotherapy and in combination with the anti–PD-1 antibody budigalimab in patients with advanced solid tumors

BackgroundTransforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1 is a pleiotropic cytokine that can promote tumor growth and suppress antitumor immune responses. Latent TGF-ß1 associates with glycoprotein-A repetition predominant (GARP) on the surface of regulatory T cells prior to its activation and release. Livmoniplimab is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds the GARP:TGF-ß1 complex to inhibit activation and release of TGF-ß1. It is in clinical development in combination with budigalimab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 Fc-modified mAb. The first-in-human, phase 1, dose-escalation results are presented herein (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03821935).MethodsThe dose-escalation phase enrolled adult patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received escalating doses of livmoniplimab ranging from 3mg to 1500mg, once every 2 weeks (Q2W), as monotherapy or in combination with a 500mg fixed dose of budigalimab Q4W. The primary objective of the dose escalation was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives were to assess safety and pharmacokinetics (PK), and exploratory objectives included evaluating preliminary efficacy.ResultsFifty-seven patients enrolled in the dose escalation: 23 in monotherapy cohorts and 34 in combination therapy cohorts. Dose-limiting toxicities were limited, no maximum tolerated dose was reached, and the maximum administered dose of 1500mg was selected for dose expansion. The most common adverse events reported in monotherapy-treated patients were fatigue, anemia, and nausea, and those in combination therapy-treated patients were pruritus, fatigue, nausea, and anemia. Livmoniplimab exhibited dose-proportional PK, and peripheral blood biomarker data demonstrated saturation of the GARP:TGF-ß1 complex on platelets at livmoniplimab doses within the linear PK range. No objective tumor responses were observed in the monotherapy dose escalation. However, the objective response rate was 15% in the combination dose escalation, with a median response duration of 8.4 months.ConclusionLivmoniplimab was well-tolerated as monotherapy and in combination with budigalimab in the dose-escalation phase. Encouraging preliminary efficacy was demonstrated in the combination dose escalation in heavily pretreated patients, supporting further development of this novel drug combination in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Optimal therapeutic strategies for hepatic metachronous oligometastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Insights from a retrospective study.

Hepatic metachronous oligometastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (hmoNPC) exhibits distinct clinical characteristics compared to other types of metastatic NPC. We investigated the optimal therapy for hmoNPC. 160 patients with hmoNPC treated in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between 2010 and 2021 were retrospectively recruited. A total of 56 patients were classified into the local therapy (LT) cohort, 23 into the systemic therapy (ST) cohort and 81 into the combination therapy (LT + ST) cohort. The median PFS was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.1-11.9 months) in the LT cohort, 15.5 months (95% CI: 10.5-32.3 months) in the ST cohort, and 31.3 months (95% CI: 20.3 to NA months) in the LT + ST cohort. The median OS was 41.1 months (95% CI: 30.0-54.0 months) in the LT cohort, 50.4 months (95% CI: 41.5 to NA months) in the ST cohort and not reached (NR) (95% CI: 77.3 to NA months) in the LT + ST cohort. Cox analysis was used to construct nomograms to predict patient outcomes. Among patients with no evidence of disease status after LT, the prognosis was significantly better in the LT + ST cohort than LT cohort (median PFS: NR [95% CI: 29.0 to NA months] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI: 10.4 to NA months]). More survival benefits were achieved with platinum-based chemotherapy than oral monotherapy (median PFS: NR [95% CI: 21.7 to NA months] vs. 17.2 months [95% CI: 10.2 to NA months]). Fewer postoperative early progression events were observed in neoadjuvant chemotherapy cohort than in adjuvant chemotherapy cohort (2.78% vs. 18.81%, P = .013). In conclusion, combining neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and local therapy was the best strategy for patients with hmoNPC.

Prevalence of adverse events following bispecific antibody therapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A meta-analysis.

e19008 Background: Bispecific antibodies (BsAb) have emerged as a new treatment modality for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphomas (R/R NHL). They exert their effect by binding to CD3 on T-cells and CD19 or CD20 on lymphoma cells, activating the T-cell to exert cytotoxic effects against the tumor and normal B-cells. Treatment related adverse events (TRAE) include infections, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity (ICANS). This meta-analysis was conducted to assess prevalence of TRAEs from prospective clinical trials that evaluated BsAb in R/R NHL. Methods: A systematic review was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane to identify BsAb clinical trials in NHL through October 2023. Eligible studies included phase I-III trials evaluating BsAb in any type of NHL, either as monotherapy or combination therapy irrespective of prior lines of treatment. Primary outcomes of interest include infection, neutropenia, CRS, and ICANS. All studies were weighted equally. Pooled prevalence estimates of TRAE were calculated using common and random effects models. Heterogeneity tests were performed using Cochran’s Q test. Subgroup analysis examined infection rates in monotherapy versus combination therapy cohorts. Results: After screening 1039 studies, 36 clinical trials with 2162 patients were included. The lymphoma subtypes were diffuse-large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma. The BsAbs included mosunetuzumab (13 studies), epcoritamab (10 studies), blinatumomab (5 studies), glofitamab (5 studies), odronextamab (2 studies), and AFM11 (1 study). The median age of patients was 66 years, and patients had received a median of two prior lines of therapy. Median follow-up duration was 9.1 months. The prevalence of all-grade infections was 35% (95% CI: 0.33-0.38; I2 = 79%). For grade ≥3 infections, the prevalence was 16% (95% CI: 0.14-0.18, (I2 = 77%). There were higher rates of all-grade infections in the combination therapy cohort (41%, 95% CI: 0.36-0.47) compared with the monotherapy cohort (33%, 95% CI: 0.30-0.36). All-grade and grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 31% (95% CI: 0.29-0.34; I2 = 80%) and 22% (95% CI: 0.20-0.24, I2 = 61%) of patients. CRS was observed in 45% of patients (95% CI: 0.43-0.48, I2 = 85%). Grade ≥3 CRS occurred in only 2% of patients (95% CI: 0.02-0.03, I2 = 0%, p = 0.99). ICANS occurred in 12% (95% CI: 0.10-0.14, I2 = 90%) while grade ≥3 ICANS was rare, at 3% (95% CI: 0.02-0.03, I2 = 0%, p = 0.99). Conclusions: BsAb is associated with nontrivial rates of infections and neutropenia. The rates of high grade CRS and ICANS are low. The heterogeneity of the findings could be attributed by an underreporting of TRAE and small sample sizes from various studies. These results highlight the need for vigilant practices to diagnose and treat infections early and consideration for antibacterial prophylaxis in this immunocompromised population.

Long-term intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy and safety of ripasudil-brimonidine fixed-dose combination for glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study.

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ripasudil-brimonidine fixed-dose combination (RBFC), a new intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medication for glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OHT). This prospective, multicentre (23 sites in Japan), open-label study enrolled patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), OHT or exfoliative glaucoma and assigned them to one of four combination therapy cohorts, based on previous treatment(s) received: prostaglandin (PG) analogue (Cohort 1); PG analogue and beta-adrenoceptor blocker (β-blocker) (Cohort 2); PG analogue, β-blocker and carbonic anhydrase inhibitor (Cohort 3); or other/no treatment (Cohort 4). After a ≥ 4-week screening period, eligible patients received twice-daily RBFC for 52weeks in addition to the treatments they were already receiving. Efficacy was assessed by change in IOP from baseline through week 52. Adverse events and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were monitored throughout. In total, 179 patients from Cohort 1 (n = 48), Cohort 2 (n = 44), Cohort 3 (n = 41) and Cohort 4 (n = 46) entered the RBFC treatment period. For all cohorts, mean IOP was significantly reduced at 11:00 (2h after instillation of RBFC) through week 52 with the changes from baseline at week 52 of - 2.7 to - 4.1mmHg across cohorts; all p < 0.001. Common ADRs were conjunctival hyperaemia (58%), allergic conjunctivitis (18%) and blepharitis (17%), most of which were mild in severity. These data demonstrated the long-term efficacy and safety of RBFC, both alone and in combination with other anti-glaucoma agents. RBFC may offer a new treatment option for the long-term management of glaucoma and OHT. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCT2080225063. 17 February 2020.

LOWER MORTALITY RISK WITH COMBINATION THERAPY WITH ANTI-TNF THERAPY AND THRIOPURINE COMPARED TO THIOPURINE ALONE IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH UC

Abstract INTRODUCTION Despite increasing incidence rates of ulcerative colitis (UC) in the elderly, efficacy and safety data for medical management in this cohort is lacking due to underrepresentation in clinical trials and registries. Selection of medical therapy is often complex, taking into consideration a multitude of factors, including real and perceived risks of infection and malignancy. In the past, immunomodulators, such as thiopurines, were commonly used as monotherapy for maintenance, offering the added advantages of affordability and oral administration. Indeed, there are elderly patients who have been maintained for decades on thiopurine monotherapy. Further, thiopurines can be used in combination with anti-TNF therapy for improved efficacy and reduced immunogenicity compared to monotherapy with either agent in ulcerative colitis (UC). Whether the use of combination therapy imposes an additive risk compared to thiopurine monotherapy is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate outcomes of thiopurine monotherapy versus combination therapy with anti-TNF agents in elderly patients (age ≥65 years) with UC. METHODS The TriNetX Research Network was accessed on October 15th, 2023, to compare outcomes in elderly patients 65 years or older with UC who are receiving thiopurine monotherapy and patients who are receiving combination therapy with an anti-TNF (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, or infliximab). The outcomes examined were 1-year rate of corticosteroid and colectomy as well as 10-year rate of mortality, colon cancer, skin cancer, and respiratory and urinary tract infections. Statistical risk analysis was performed using the TriNetX analytical platform. RESULTS A total of 2,597 patients (2,245 thiopurines monotherapy and 352 AZA plus anti-TNF combination therapy) were included in the study (Table 1). Among the monotherapy and combination therapy cohorts, mean age was 71 years old and approximately 56% male. Ten-year mortality was higher in the thiopurine monotherapy group (OR 1.67, p=0.002). The combination therapy cohort had higher rates of steroid use (32.4% vs. 24.3%, p=0.001) and colectomy at 1 year compared to the monotherapy cohort (4.5% vs. 1.2%, p&amp;lt;0.001). There was no significant difference in 10-year risk of colon cancer (OR 1.05, p=0.88), skin cancer (OR 1.51, p=0.06), incidence of respiratory (OR 1.48, p=0.07) and urinary tract infections (OR 1.18, p=0.23). CONCLUSION The study findings highlight the risks of thiopurine use in patients over the age of 65 given the significantly higher 10-year mortality risk in thiopurine monotherapy-treated patients. The results also suggest that combination therapy with thiopurine and anti-TNF therapies - despite utilization in patients with more active disease indicators - is not associated with an additive risk in terms of infection and mortality in elderly patients. Table 1 Characteristics and Outcomes of Elderly Patients with UC either on Thiopurine Monotherapy or Combination Therapy with anti-TNF agents

Comparison of the efficacy of anti-diabetic medications as add-on to metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus from a real-world database

BackgroundMetformin is recommended as a first-line drug in the guidelines of the treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, high-quality evidence from clinical trials directly comparing the degree of hypoglycemic effect of combination therapy of metformin and a hypoglycemic agent with a different mechanism of action with that of monotherapy of a hypoglycemic drug is lacking. We aimed to examine whether combination therapy of hypoglycemic agents with metformin showed antagonism, addition, or synergism compared to monotherapy with hypoglycemic agents other than metformin regarding hemoglobin A1c levels.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study used a medical information database in Japan. Non-insulin anti-hyperglycemic agents with different mechanisms of action were classified into eight drug classes. A monotherapy cohort and a combination therapy added to the metformin cohort were defined. The change in hemoglobin A1c levels was evaluated to compare the treatment effect between the cohorts.ResultsA total of 13,359 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the monotherapy cohort and 1,064 in the metformin combination therapy cohort were identified. A comparison of the change from baseline HbA1c level by drug class between the two cohorts showed a similar trend. Among those treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, no clinically significant difference was observed between the two cohorts (0.00% and -0.07% for unadjusted, 0.15% and -0.03% for propensity score matching-adjusted, and 0.09% and -0.01% for inverse probability treatment weighting-adjusted analysis).ConclusionsAccording to the results of this study, the effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor or sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor added to metformin seems to be additive with respect to the reduction in hemoglobin A1c.

Olutasidenib Alone or in Combination with Azacitidine Induces Durable Complete Remissions in Patients with mIDH1 Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms (MDS)

Introduction Olutasidenib is a potent, selective, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1). Olutasidenib is approved in the US for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) based on the pivotal cohort (n=153) of a registrational Phase 1/2 trial (NCT02719574), which demonstrated a rate of complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) of 35%, with a duration of response of 25.9 months. The Phase 1/2 study also enrolled patients with mIDH1 myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS), and here we report results from this subset of 22 patients. Methods The Phase 1/2 open-label study enrolled 332 adult patients with mIDH1 AML or intermediate-, high-, or very high-risk MDSfrom 57 centers in 9 countries. Inclusion criteria included an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 and adequate liver and renal function. Patients were R/R to prior therapy or, if treatment-naïve (TN), had to be eligible for azacitidine therapy (to be enrolled in a combination therapy cohort). Olutasidenib was administered at 150 mg BID (n=3) or 100-150 QD (n=3) as monotherapy or in combination with azacitidine (n=16), given at 75 mg/mm 2 daily for 7 consecutive days, in 28-day cycles. The primary efficacy endpoint for MDS was the CR rate, based on response criteria of the International Working Group in MDS. Secondary efficacy endpoints included overall response (CR/PR/marrow CR), time to response, duration of response and safety. Results Twenty-two patients with MDS were enrolled, including 6 who received monotherapy (4 R/R and 2 TN) and 16 who received combination therapy (11 R/R and 5 TN). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics are shown in Table 1. The age ranged from 59-87 years, and 59% of the study population were male. Seven patients were treatment-naïve and 15 were R/R with 1-4 prior treatment regimens. For the pooled Phase 1 and 2 data (n=22), 6 (27%) patients achieved CR and 7 (32%) patients achieved marrow CR with no PRs, generating a 59% overall response rate. The median time to response was 2.0 months. The median duration of response was not reached (NR) at 30.1+ months ( Table 2). The overall response rate was 2/6 (33%) for monotherapy and 11/16 (69%) for combination therapy. Three of 6 patients received monotherapy at a lower dose (100-150 QD) than the approved dose level, and none responded. Of the 3 patients who received monotherapy at the approved dose level (150mg BID), 2 (66%) responded. In the 7 TN patients, the overall response rate was 86%. In the 15 R/R patients, the overall response rate was 47%. All patients with MDS experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). The most frequent TEAEs in the study were nausea, constipation, vomiting, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, and fatigue. Grade 3 TEAEs occurred in 19/22 (86%) patients, and Grade 4 TEAEs in 9/22 (41%). The most frequent Grade 3/4 TEAEs reported were cytopenias. Grade 3 transaminitis occurred in 4 patients. Grade 3 differentiation syndrome was reported in 1 patient, who discontinued treatment after 23 days due to pneumonia, which lead to respiratory failure and death. TEAEs resulting in death occurred in 5 patients and included disease progression (3), pneumonia (1, mentioned above) and chest fungal infection (1). The overall safety profile in patients with MDS was consistent with what has been reported in patients with AML in this study (Watts, et al., Lancet Hematol, 2022; de Botton et al., Blood Adv, 2023). Conclusions Olutasidenib, both as monotherapy and in combination with azacitidine, induced durable remissions in patients with intermediate-, high-, or very high-risk MDS. Patients had varying treatment backgrounds, including treatment-naïve and up to four prior regimens. This treatment had a tolerable and manageable safety profile. These encouraging results, which warrant further investigation with a larger number of patients, show that olutasidenib has clinically meaningful activity in patients with mIDH1 MDS.

Zanzalintinib in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Design of the renal cell carcinoma expansion stage cohorts in STELLAR-002

Abstract Background: Zanzalintinib (XL092) is a novel, potent, orally bioavailable small molecule inhibitor of several receptor tyrosine kinases, including VEGFR2, MET, and the TAM kinases AXL, and MER. These receptor tyrosine kinases are implicated in several oncogenic processes, including tumor angiogenesis, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. MET and AXL are known to play important roles in the development of resistance to antiangiogenic therapies. In addition, drugs targeting the TAM kinases are thought to promote an immune-permissive environment, potentially enhancing responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This hypothesis has been confirmed in preclinical murine tumor models in which zanzalintinib in combination with an anti–PD-1 agent showed significantly greater antitumor and immunomodulatory activity, as well as a greater survival benefit, when compared with either agent alone (Hsu J, et al. Mol Cancer Ther 2023). In a phase 1 first-in-human study, zanzalintinib alone or in combination with atezolizumab showed a manageable safety profile and a half-life of 16–22 hours for zanzalintinib supporting once-daily dosing. The combination also showed promising clinical activity in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC; Sharma MR, et al. ESMO 2022:Abs 481P). The encouraging preclinical and clinical activity support the evaluation of zanzalintinib in combination with ICIs in clinical studies, including STELLAR-304 (NCT05678673), a randomized study that is exploring the efficacy and safety of zanzalintinib in combination with nivolumab in patients with non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC). STELLAR-002 (NCT05176483) is another ongoing study assessing the safety and preliminary efficacy of zanzalintinib in multiple ICI combinations in patients with advanced solid tumors. Presented here is the study design of the cohort-expansion stage for patients with RCC in STELLAR-002. Methods: STELLAR-002 is a multicenter, open-label, phase 1b trial consisting of a dose-escalation stage and a tumor-specific cohort-expansion stage. The study is enrolling adults who have a cytologically or histologically confirmed solid tumor that is unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic. In addition, patients with RCC enrolled in the expansion phase must have measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by the investigator. The recommended doses of zanzalintinib plus nivolumab, zanzalintinib plus nivolumab and ipilimumab, and zanzalintinib plus nivolumab and relatlimab are being established in the dose-escalation stage of the study. The study includes three dose-expansion cohorts for patients with RCC: first-line clear cell RCC (ccRCC; Cohort 1), second-line ccRCC after 1 prior ICI-based combination therapy (Cohort 2), and first-line nccRCC (Cohort 6). The following regimens are available options for randomization at the recommended dose depending on the cohort: single-agent zanzalintinib (Regimen A), zanzalintinib plus nivolumab (Regimen B), zanzalintinib plus nivolumab and ipilimumab (Regimen C), or zanzalintinib plus nivolumab and relatlimab (Regimen D). Patients in Cohort 1 may be randomized to Regimens B, C, or D, patients in Cohort 2 to Regimens A, B, or D, and patients in Cohort 6 to Regimens A or B. The primary objectives of the cohort-expansion stage are objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 (as assessed by the investigator) and incidence and severity of adverse events, including serious and immune-mediated events. The trial is ongoing and enrolling patients from 13 countries in North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region.

Real-world Comparative Effectiveness of Methotrexate-based Combinations for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Guidelines recommend using disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after monotherapy. Little is known about the real-world comparative effectiveness of these MTX-DMARD combinations. This study compared the effectiveness of various MTX-based DMARD combinations for patients with RA initiating MTX-DMARD combination therapy using administrative claims database. This retrospective cohort study included adults (aged ≥18 years) with RA who initiated MTX combination treatment with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), non-TNFi bDMARDs, or targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) between July 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013 (index date), from the MarketScan Commercial Claims Data. Patients had continuous enrollment from the 6 months of preindex period until the 12 months of postindex period. The MTX-based DMARD combination therapy cohort was defined as ≥1 MTX prescription in the first 30 days from the index date and ≥14 days overlapping use of the prescription fills of the MTX and the index DMARD. Effectiveness was measured by using the claims algorithm (dosing, switching, addition, oral glucocorticoid use, or multiple glucocorticoid injection). Propensity score analysis with the inverse probability of treatment weighting (PS-IPTW), estimated by using the generalized boosted machine learning method, was used to balance the distribution of baseline variables between the combination groups. Multivariable logistic regression using PS-IPTW was conducted to compare the effectiveness of the combination groups. Sensitivity analysis evaluated the modified effectiveness algorithms or the time to the first treatment failure. A total of 3174 adult patients with RA starting an MTX-DMARD combination therapy were identified (mean [SD] age, 50 [9] years), including 1568 (49%) initiating a csDMARD+MTX, 1343 (42%) initiating TNFi+MTX, and 240 (8%) initiating non-TNFi bDMARD+MTX, and 23 (1%) initiating tsDMARD+MTX. Owing to the small sample, the tsDMARD combination group was not included in the comparative analysis. Algorithm-based therapy effectiveness was found in 9.95% of the csDMARD+MTX, 20.48% of the TNFi+MTX, and 20.83% of the non-TNFi+MTX groups. PS-IPTW showed that the csDMARD combination is less effective (adjusted odds ratio, 0.422; 95% CI, 0.341-0.524) than the TNFi combination; however, the non-TNFi biologic combination had similar effectiveness (aOR, 1.063; 95% CI, 0.680-1.662) compared to the TNFi combination. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the main results. Among RA patients initiating MTX-DMARD combinations, both non-TNFi biologics and TNFi-based combinations with MTX were equally effective, but csDMARD+MTX was less effective than the TNFi plus MTX.

Combination Therapy of Ceftazidime/Avibactam for the Treatment of Patients Infected with Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

This study aimed to evaluate the different efficacies between monotherapy and combination therapy with ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) in treating carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infection. We retrospectively analyzed observational multicenter data from 38 hospitals in China. Multivariate regression analysis was used to explore the association between combination therapy with CAZ/AVI and in-hospital mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to validate our findings. A total of 132 eligible patients were divided into CAZ/AVI combination therapy (n = 43) and monotherapy (n = 89) cohorts. Multivariate logistic regression showed that there was no statistically significant relationship between combination therapy and a lower risk of in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.907, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.329-2.498, p = 0.850]. In the subgroup of critical patients who were in the intensive care unit (ICU) (OR 0.943, 95%CI 0.221-4.033, p = 0.937) or with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) ≥ 3 (OR 0.733, 95%CI 0.191-2.808, p = 0.650), CAZ/AVI combination therapy was not a lower risk factor for in-hospital mortality. Moreover, in the subgroup of patients using CAZ/AVI plus tigecycline (accounting for 46.5% in the combination therapy) compared with CAZ/AVI monotherapy, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in in-hospital mortality, nor in the subgroup of patients with CRKP-associated pneumonia. Combination therapy (or CAZ/AVI combined with tigecycline) and monotherapy with CAZ/AVI had similar prognoses in patients with only CRKP infection (or CRKP-associated pneumonia), as well as in critically ill patients. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

A phase 1 study of TPST-1495 as a single agent and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

3107 Background: TPST-1495 is a novel oral therapy designed to be a selective dual antagonist of the prostanoid receptors, EP2 and EP4. Through these receptors, PGE2 stimulates tumor growth, suppresses immunity, and supports adaptive resistance to checkpoint inhibitors. In preclinical models, dual EP2/EP4 inhibition with TPST-1495 increased anti-tumor efficacy, reduced immune suppression, and activated immune effector response significantly better than single EP2 or EP4 antagonists and the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib. Methods: In this Phase 1 study, subjects with advanced solid tumors received TPST-1495 in a modified 3+3 design optimizing dose and schedule as monotherapy and in combination with standard dose pembrolizumab. Study objectives included safety, PK/PD, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), anti-tumor activity and exploratory biomarkers. AEs were assessed per CTCAE v5 and efficacy per RECIST v1.1. Results: TPST-1495 monotherapy was dosed BID (n=11), QD (n=22) or QD days 1-5 every 7 days (n=17) and in combination was dosed QD only with pembrolizumab 200 mg IV q3 weeks (n=24). TPST-1495 doses ranged from 15 mg QD to 100 mg BID. Most subjects had CRC (61%) followed by endometrial (5.4%) and pancreatic (5.4%) cancer. Median prior lines of systemic therapy were 4 (2-10) in monotherapy; 3 (1-8) in combination The most common treatment related AEs (TRAEs) were diarrhea (22%), abdominal pain (20%), fatigue, and nausea (18% each) for monotherapy and nausea (29%), fatigue (21%) and diarrhea (17%) for combination therapy. The most common Gr 3 TRAEs were anemia (6.0%) in monotherapy, and ALT/ AST increased and fatigue (4.2% each) in combination. No Gr 4/5 TRAEs were reported. For mono vs combo cohorts, the median time on study was 1.9 mo (0.2 – 10.2) vs 2.7 mo (0.5 – 10.4) and the disease control rate was 43% (19/44) vs 43% (9/21) with 1 PR in a combination subject with MSS CRC. Pharmacodynamic activities included on-treatment increases in urine PGE2 metabolites and drug-dependent TNF-α rescue in an ex-vivo whole blood PGE2 challenge assay. The RP2D is 50 mg QD for mono and in evaluation for combo therapy. In a subject with endometrial cancer with 22% tumor shrinkage and 222+ days on combination therapy paired biopsies showed high COX-2 expression in the TME at baseline and increased CD8+ and CD8+GrB T cell infiltration on treatment. Conclusions: PGE2 is an important target for cancer and immunotherapy but remains ineffectively drugged. TPST-1495 is a novel oral therapy that inhibits signaling only at the tumor promoting EP2/EP4 receptors. In patients with heavily treated solid tumors, primarily MSS CRC, TPST-1495 had pharmacodynamic activity, a manageable safety profile, and a potential signal of activity consistent with the preclinical data and IO combination mechanism. A combination therapy cohort in endometrial cancer is underway. Updated results and biomarker work will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT04344795 .

Efficacy of PD-1 Inhibitors Combined with Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in Driver Gene Mutation Negative Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Brain Metastases.

Anti-angiogenic therapy has proven effective in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic therapy in patients with driver gene mutation negative NSCLC and brain metastases (BMs). A retrospective analysis was performed on NSCLC BMs in patients without driver gene mutations who received PD-1 inhibitors. Two groups, receiving either PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or PD-1 inhibitor plus anti-angiogenesis therapy, were identified. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). The secondary endpoints were safety, intracranial objective response rate (iORR) and intracranial disease control rate (iDCR). 113 NSCLC patients were included, 51 (45.1%) in the PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy group and 62 (54.9%) in the PD-1 inhibitor plus anti-angiogenesis therapy group. The median follow-up time was 26.2 months. OS was higher in the combination therapy cohort than in the monotherapy cohort (OS: 21.4 vs. 11.8 months; p = 0.004), with no significant difference in iPFS (p = 0.088). Moreover, the PD-1 inhibitor + anti-angiogenic therapeutic regimen exhibited the preferred iDCR (p = 0.005) but not the iORR (p = 0.121). There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events between the two groups. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, PD-1 inhibitor therapy combined with anti-angiogenic treatment (p = 0.003) was an independent prognostic indicator of OS. Combining PD-1 inhibitor therapy with anti-angiogenic treatment significantly improves the OS of driver gene mutation negative NSCLC patients with BMs.

Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy vs. immunotherapy alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer and programmed death ligand 1 score

IntroductionLittle is known about the effectiveness of immunotherapy alone or with chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression <50 %. We examined the outcomes of PD-L1 therapy vs. PD-L1 therapy in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment among NSCLC patients with PD-L1 score <50 %. MethodsWe used administrative claims and prior authorization data of a national insurer from November 2015 to July 2021. We selected patients with Stage IIIb/IV NSCLC and PD-L1 expression <50 %. Each patient was required to have ≥1 claim of a PD-L1 or PD-1 inhibitor. Treatment groups were propensity-score matched 1:1 on baseline characteristics. We measured PD-L1 therapy duration, incident immune-related adverse events (irAEs), healthcare utilization, costs, and overall survival (OS). ResultsIn the matched sample totaling 176 patients, mean duration of PD-L1 therapy was similar (4.1 [SD 3.3] months combination vs. 4.0 [SD 4.9] months monotherapy, p = 0.800). IrAEs were similar, both for FDA-recognized irAEs (48.9 % combination, 48.9 % monotherapy, p = 0.710) and other types (34.1 % combination, 39.8 % monotherapy, p = 0.473). The combination group had more all-cause inpatient stays, ER visits, and outpatient visits (all p < 0.001). Total adjusted all-cause medical cost was $112,833 (95 % CI $5,548-$251,973) higher for combination therapy. We saw no difference in OS (adjusted hazard ratio 1.09 [95 % CI 0.72–1.65]). ConclusionThis study found no difference in adverse drug effects or survival between PD-L1 monotherapy compared to combination therapy for patients with Stage IIIb/IV NSCLC and PD-L1 expression <50 %, though the combination therapy cohort had higher healthcare utilization and costs. MicroAbstractUse of immunotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer and programmed death ligand 1 expression <50 % is understudied. Our observational study using claims and authorization data from a matched sample of 176 patients found no difference in survival or the rate of adverse drug effects between groups, although the chemo-immunotherapy cohort generated higher overall healthcare costs.

A Phase 1 Study with the Novel B-Cell Lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) Inhibitor Bgb-11417 As Monotherapy or in Combination with Zanubrutinib (ZANU) in Patients (Pts) with CLL/SLL: Preliminary Data

Background/introduction: The effectiveness of Bcl-2 inhibitors as a treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) was established by the approval of venetoclax in pts with CLL/SLL across all lines of therapy. However, the related adverse events (AEs) and emergence of BCL2 mutations, resulting in resistance, can limit the utility of venetoclax. BGB-11417 is a highly selective Bcl-2 inhibitor with potency >10 times that of venetoclax in biochemical assays. BGB-11417 monotherapy is tolerable, with no maximum tolerated dose (MTD) reached after dose escalation through all planned doses to 640 mg once daily (QD) in pts with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (EHA 2022. Abstract P687). The combination of Bcl-2 and Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors is tolerable with synergistic activity in CLL and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (J Clin Oncol 2019;37:2722-9; N Engl J Med 2019;380:2095-103; EHA 2020. Abstract S158; N Engl J Med 2018;378:1211-23). ZANU, a next-generation BTK inhibitor, has shown favorable activity and safety in pts with CLL/SLL (EHA 2021. Abstract LB1900) and Waldenström macroglobulinemia (Blood. 2020;136(18):2038-2050). BGB-11417-101 is an ongoing first-in-human phase 1/1b dose-escalation/expansion study (NCT04277637). Pts with various B-cell malignancies were enrolled; data from CLL/SLL cohorts are presented here. Methods: In separate monotherapy and combination therapy cohorts, pts received escalating doses of BGB-11417 (40, 80, 160, 320, or 640 mg QD) with a ramp-up to the intended target dose to minimize risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). In combination therapy cohorts, pts received ZANU (320 mg QD or 160 mg twice daily) beginning 8-12 weeks before BGB-11417. Dose-limiting toxicity for each cohort was evaluated by a Bayesian logistic regression model during dose ramp-up through day 21 at the intended dose. AEs were reported per Common Terminology Criteria for AEs v5.0. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed by a European Research Initiative on CLL flow cytometry assay. Results: As of May 15 2022, 50 pts with CLL received treatment: 6 monotherapy (all relapsed/refractory [R/R]) and 44 combination (22 R/R; 22 treatment naïve [TN]). The monotherapy CLL cohort received BGB-11417 doses up to 160 mg. Based on emerging safety data from other cohorts, pts in combination cohorts with R/R CLL received BGB-11417 up to 640 mg and pts with TN CLL received up to 320 mg (data include 8 pts in ZANU pretreatment not yet dosed with BGB-11417). MTD has not yet been reached for any CLL cohort, with dose escalation ongoing. Median follow-up was 11.5 mo (range 8.5-18.3) for monotherapy and 5.8 mo (range 0.2-10.5) for combination. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) across all doses are listed in the Table. With monotherapy, cytopenias were the most common TEAEs (≥50%), with 33% grade ≥3. With combination, contusion, neutropenia, and low-grade gastrointestinal toxicity were the most common TEAEs (≥22.7%); neutropenia was the most common grade ≥3 TEAE (11.4%) with 5 pts. No pts discontinued monotherapy treatment, and 1 pt discontinued combination treatment (disease progression; Richter transformation). Only 1 high-risk pt with CLL on monotherapy had laboratory TLS that resolved with no intervention (overall laboratory TLS ≤2%). No clinical TLS was reported. Diarrhea was mostly grade 1 and grade ≥3 was not seen. Although efficacy data are early, most pts with CLL/SLL had notable reductions in absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) with responses seen at doses as low as 1 mg (Figure), consistent with improved potency of BGB-11417 vs venetoclax. Four responses (66%, partial response [PR] or better) and 32 responses (72.7%, PR with lymphocytosis or better) were observed with mono- and combination therapy, respectively. MRD data are early: among 4 MRD evaluable pts at 160 mg, 3 pts (2 monotherapy; 1 combination) had a peripheral blood CLL count <10-4 at 24 weeks after BGB-11417 initiation. Conclusion: These preliminary data show BGB-11417, alone or in combination with ZANU, was well-tolerated in most patients. Grade ≥3 neutropenia was uncommon and manageable. Efficacy is supported by the rapid reduction in ALC during ramp-up, and early response data are promising. TLS rates are low; the prophylactic measures and ramp-up schedule seem to adequately mitigate TLS across all dose levels tested. Mature MRD data are forthcoming, and venetoclax-treated CLL/SLL cohorts will soon be open for enrollment. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Abstract PO024: Combination therapy with PXS-5505 improves chemotherapeutic efficacy and reduces myeloid immune suppression in murine cholangiocarcinoma – a novel therapeutic strategy for clinical translation

Abstract Introduction: Despite growing prevalence, 5-year survival for cholangiocarcinoma remains poor due to an immunosuppressive fibroinflammatory stroma, featuring abundant collagen and cancer-associated fibroblasts. Lysyl oxidases (LOX) consist of 5 secreted enzymes that catalyze collagen cross-linking, resulting in increased tumor stroma density and facilitate immune evasion. Here, we present our findings of pan-LOX inhibition with a novel orally dosed agent (PXS-5505) in a murine model of CCA. Methods: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis was performed on a human tissue macro-array of CCA. Mice that develop spontaneous CCA (KPPC) or orthotopically injected with a syngeneic cell line derived from a KPPC tumor were screened for disease onset and progression with ultrasonography (U/S). Groups of KPPC mice or mice bearing orthotopic tumors were enrolled into treatment cohorts of chemotherapy with or without PXS-5505 to evaluate survival and to perform fixed time point studies with treated tumors including assessment of intratumoral interstitial fluid pressure (IFP), IHC analysis of tumor markers, chemotherapy drug perfusion into tumors by mass spectrometry, and flow cytometry analysis of tumor single cell suspensions for stromal and immune cell populations. Results: IHC analysis demonstrated significantly elevated LOX expression in both human and KPPC CCA (p&amp;lt;0.0001 and p=0.0025, respectively) compared to normal liver controls. High LOX expression was associated with worse disease-free (p=0.02) and overall (p=0.03) survival in resected human CCA specimens. KPPC mice treated with the combination of chemotherapy plus PXS-5505 demonstrated delayed tumor growth (p&amp;lt;0.0001) and ascites onset (p=0.005) with improved survival (median 77 vs. 59 days, p=0.001) compared to chemotherapy alone. In addition, combination therapy reduced IFP (p=0.002) and was associated with increased mean blood vessel area (p&amp;lt;0.0001) and increased concentration of intratumoral chemotherapy levels (p=0.02) compared to chemotherapy alone. Subsequent IHC revealed increased cell death through cleaved caspase-3 (p=0.0003) and damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) release through HMGB1 (p=0.0004). Flow cytometry analysis of tumors treated with combination therapy demonstrated reduced prevalence of tumor-infiltrating monocytic and granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell populations (p=0.002 and p=0.01, respectively) and tumor associated macrophages (TAMs; p=0.02). There were increased CD4+ (p=0.01) T-cells with a reduced proportion of Treg+CD4+ (p&amp;lt;0.0001) T-cells. The ratio of CD8:Treg was significantly elevated in the combination therapy cohort (p=0.001) and depletion of T-cells in orthotopic tumors abrogated the improved survival with combination therapy. Conclusions: LOX is elevated in human CCA and its expression correlates with prognosis following resection. Combination therapy with PXS-5505 delays tumor progression and improves survival in murine CCA models. Thus, chemotherapy combined with PXS-5505 represents a novel therapeutic strategy for treating CCA. Citation Format: Paul R Burchard, Luis I Ruffolo, Nicholas A Ullman, Yatee Dave, Benjamin Dale, Mary Georger, Rachel Jewell, Nabeel Badri, Brian A Belt, David C Linehan, Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro. Combination therapy with PXS-5505 improves chemotherapeutic efficacy and reduces myeloid immune suppression in murine cholangiocarcinoma – a novel therapeutic strategy for clinical translation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Advances in the Pathogenesis and Molecular Therapies of Liver Cancer; 2022 May 5-8; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(17_Suppl):Abstract nr PO024.

P687: A PHASE 1 STUDY WITH THE NOVEL B-CELL LYMPHOMA 2 (BCL2) INHIBITOR BGB-11417 AS MONOTHERAPY OR IN COMBINATION WITH ZANUBRUTINIB (ZANU) IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH B-CELL MALIGNANCIES: PRELIMINARY DATA

Background: BCL2 is aberrantly expressed in many hematologic malignancies and promotes tumorigenesis by enabling cells to evade apoptosis. BCL2 inhibitors have an established role in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and acute myeloid leukemia. The currently approved BCL2 inhibitor, venetoclax, is associated with mild gastrointestinal toxicities, neutropenia, and the development of BCL2 mutations leading to resistance. BGB-11417 is a highly selective inhibitor of BCL2 with superior potency to venetoclax in human acute lymphoblastic leukemia, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cell lines, and xenograft model of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). BGB-11417 has favorable pharmacokinetics with excellent bioavailability and selectivity for BCL2. Toxicology studies have shown a broad therapeutic index and an improved safety profile. Aims: BGB-11417-101 is an ongoing first-in-human phase 1/1b dose-escalation and expansion study (NCT04277637) evaluating the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase 2 dose of oral BGB-11417 as monotherapy or in combination with the BTK inhibitor ZANU, in pts with B-cell malignancies. Methods: In separate monotherapy and combination therapy dose-escalation cohorts, pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies received escalating doses of BGB-11417 (40, 80, 160, 320, or 640 mg once daily [QD]) with a weekly or daily ramp-up to intended target dose. Pts in the combination therapy cohorts received ZANU (320 mg QD or 160 mg twice daily) 8-12 weeks before BGB-11417. Dose-limiting toxicity for each dose cohort was evaluated by a Bayesian logistic regression model during dose ramp-up through day 21 at intended dose. Adverse events (AEs) were reported per Common Terminology Criteria for AEs v5.0. Results: As of 17 Dec 2021, 58 pts received BGB-11417 (32 monotherapy; 26 combination). Of the pts receiving monotherapy, 26 with R/R non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; 17 DLBCL, 6 follicular lymphoma, and 3 marginal zone lymphoma) received BGB-11417 ≤640 mg and 6 with R/R CLL/SLL received ≤160 mg. Of the pts receiving combination treatment, 19 with R/R CLL/SLL received BGB-11417 ≤160 mg and 7 with R/R MCL received ≤80 mg. MTD has not yet been reached. Median follow-up was 3.9 months (range, 0.1-20.4). AEs across all dose levels are listed in the table. Only 2 grade ≥3 AEs (1 neutropenia, 1 autoimmune hemolytic anemia) were reported in combination cohorts. Twenty pts discontinued treatment (17 disease progression; 1 AE; 2 other reasons). One high-risk pt with CLL on monotherapy had laboratory tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) that resolved with no intervention (laboratory TLS <2%). Efficacy data are early: most pts had reduction in sum of product of perpendicular diameters; 2 pts with NHL (monotherapy) achieved responses (1 complete response). Pts with CLL/SLL had notable reductions in absolute lymphocyte count at doses as low as 1 mg; 2 responses (partial response or better) were seen with monotherapy and 12 responses with combination (partial response with lymphocytosis or better). Image:Summary/Conclusion: These preliminary data show promising efficacy for BGB-11417 and an improved safety profile, particularly in combination cohorts. Grade ≥3 neutropenia was uncommon. BGB-11417 is tolerable up to doses of 640 mg as monotherapy and up to 160 mg in combination with ZANU. Dose escalation continues as an MTD has not yet been reached in any dose-escalation cohort. Enrollment continues, with data for Waldenström macroglobulinemia and treatment-naïve CLL/SLL cohorts forthcoming.

A phase 1b study (STELLAR-002) of XL092 administered in combination with nivolumab (NIVO) with or without ipilimumab (IPI) or bempegaldesleukin (BEMPEG) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

TPS4600 Background: XL092 is a novel oral inhibitor of receptor tyrosine kinases, including MET, VEGFR2, and TAM kinases (AXL, MER), which are implicated in tumor growth, metastasis, angiogenesis, and immune suppression of the tumor microenvironment. XL092 has a relatively short half-life (̃21h) to support convenient daily dosing and help manage tolerability. Preclinical studies of XL092 with an anti‒PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) demonstrated antitumor activity in tumor models, and BEMPEG (IL-2 pathway agonist) showed synergy with anti‒PD-L1 and anti‒CTLA-4 agents. This phase 1b trial will evaluate the safety and clinical activity of XL092 alone and in combination with NIVO (anti‒PD-1 mAb) ±IPI (anti‒CTLA-4 mAb) or ±BEMPEG in pts with advanced solid tumors including genitourinary cancers. Presented here is the study design. Methods: This multicenter phase 1b, open-label study (NCT05176483) will enroll pts with unresectable advanced or metastatic solid tumors in dose-escalation and expansion stages. In the dose-escalation stage, ̃36 pts will be enrolled in three XL092 combination therapy cohorts using a rolling 6 design. Cohort A: XL092 (starting dose [SD] 100 mg PO QD) + NIVO (360 mg IV Q3W); Cohort B: XL092 (SD 80 mg PO QD) + NIVO (3 mg/kg IV Q3W × 4, then 480 mg IV Q4W) + IPI (1 mg/kg Q3W × 4); Cohort C: XL092 (SD 100 mg PO QD) + NIVO (360 mg IV Q3W) + BEMPEG (0.006 mg/kg IV Q3W). The primary objective of the dose-escalation stage is to determine the recommended doses of XL092 with the NIVO regimens to be used in the expansion stage. The expansion stage will include cohorts of advanced genitourinary tumors: Cohort 1, clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), no prior systemic therapy; Cohort 2, ccRCC, 1 prior ICI combination regimen; Cohort 3, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), 1 prior novel-hormonal therapy; Cohort 4, urothelial carcinoma (UC), 1 prior platinum-based regimen, ICI-naïve; Cohort 5, UC, ≤2 prior systemic regimens, ICI-experienced; Cohort 6, non-ccRCC, no prior systemic therapy. In each cohort, pts will be randomized to one of the following treatments (based on tumor cohort): single-agent XL092 (Cohorts 2‒6); XL092+NIVO (Cohorts 1‒6); NIVO+IPI (Cohort 1); XL092+NIVO+IPI (Cohorts 1, 3, 6); NIVO+BEMPEG (Cohort 1), XL092+NIVO+BEMPEG (Cohort 1, 2, 4‒6). Thirty pts will be enrolled in each single-agent XL092 arm and 40 pts in each combination therapy arm. Expansion stage objectives are to assess preliminary efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of XL092 alone or in combination in each tumor-specific cohort. Primary efficacy endpoints include objective response rate by investigator per RECIST v1.1 and progression-free survival by blinded independent radiology committee per Prostate Working Group 3 criteria (mCRPC cohort only). The study is currently enrolling pts. Clinical trial information: NCT05176483.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients With Metastatic NSCLC Previously Treated With Programmed Cell Death Protein-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Inhibitors

IntroductionProgrammed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are standard-of-care treatment for metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC). Intolerance to treatment/disease progression warrants additional lines of therapy. Real-world treatment patterns and efficacy outcomes after PD-1/PD-L1 use are insufficiently characterized to inform treatment decisions. MethodsElectronic health records of adults with stage IV NSCLC initiating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line monotherapy (cohort 1), first-line combination therapy (cohort 2), or second-line monotherapy (cohort 3) who received a subsequent line of therapy (i.e., index therapy) in the Flatiron NSCLC Core Registry Dataset were identified. Patient characteristics, types of index treatments/therapies, and associated index treatment outcomes were extracted. ResultsA total of 1061 patients with mNSCLC were included in this analysis. In cohort 1 (n = 242), median real-world overall survival (mrwOS) with index therapies for the overall population was 9.18 months (95% confidence interval: 7.54–12.13); platinum-based chemotherapy was the most common index therapy (39.3%) with mrwOS of 12.52 months (8.39–not applicable). In cohort 2 (n = 145), mrwOS for the overall population was 6.43 months (5.34–7.61); vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor plus chemotherapy was the most common index therapy (32.4%) with mrwOS of 5.97 months (4.95–7.34). In cohort 3 (n = 647), mrwOS for the overall population was 7.21 months (6.39–7.80); single-agent chemotherapy was the most common index therapy (45.4%) with mrwOS of 6.59 months (5.64–7.61). ConclusionsReal-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes of index therapies in mNSCLC after PD-1/PD-L1 use are variable. These analyses provide insights to optimize post–PD-1/PD-L1 treatments and inform standards of care.

OS12.6.A Combination therapy of CAR-NK-cells and anti-PD-1 results in high efficacy against advanced-stage glioblastoma in a syngeneic mouse model and induces protective anti-tumor immunity in vivo

Abstract INTRODUCTION Checkpoint inhibitors as well as adoptive cell therapy hold promise for cancer therapy and encouraging treatment responses have already been demonstrated in different cancer indications. Glioblastoma (GB) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. Standard therapy has very limited efficacy in the majority of patients. Analysis of the GB microenvironment (TME) has shown prominent immunosuppressive features, including expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells and increased frequency of FOXP3-positive regulatory T cells. While the surrounding brain is HER2-negative, GB are frequently HER2-positive, suggesting HER2 as a promising target for adoptive immunotherapy. Previous results from mouse glioma models showed efficacy of CAR-NK cells (NK-92/5.28.z) targeted against HER2 as monotherapy with early stage but not with advanced-stage tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS The murine glioma cell line GL261 was transfected with human HER2. Tumor cells were implanted either subcutaneously or orthotopically into C57BL/6 mice and treated either with HER2-specific NK-92/5.28.z cells alone or in combination with an anti-PD-1 antibody. Effects on tumor growth and survival were determined. Lymphocyte infiltration and immunosuppressive TME were characterized via highplex multi-color flow cytometry (FACS Symphony) and IHC (Phenoptics). Furthermore, gene expression profiles of tumor-infiltrating cells were determined via bulk RNAseq (NanoString). RESULTS Combined treatment with NK-92/5.28.z cells and anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade resulted in synergistic effects, with tumor regression and long-term survival observed even in advanced-stage tumor bearing mice. Analysis of the TME showed changes in lymphocyte infiltration and increased expression of exhaustion markers in tumor and immune upon combined treatment with NK-92/5.28.z cells and anti-PD-1 antibody resulting in an altered TME. Both, PD-1 and Lag-3 expression are highly upregulated on tumor infiltrating T cells. Total infiltrating lymphocytes show a rather cytotoxic phenotype up combination treatment with NK-92/5.28.z cells and anti-PD-1 antibody CONCLUSION Our data demonstrate that efficacy of NK-92/5.28.z cells can be enhanced by combination with checkpoint blockade, resulting in successful treatment of advanced tumors refractory to NK-92/5.28.z monotherapy. Furthermore, the combination therapy induced a cytotoxic rather than immunosuppressive TME, leading to a primed immune system. To translate the concept of CAR-NK-cell therapy plus checkpoint inhibition to a clinical setting, we are adding a combination therapy cohort to our ongoing phase I clinical study (CAR2BRAIN; NCT03383978).