Talimogene Laherparepvec In Combination Research Articles

A phase II randomized trial of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) oncolytic immunotherapy with or without radiotherapy for patients with cutaneous metastases from solid tumors.

2639 Background: Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is an oncolytic immunotherapy made from a modified herpes virus expressing granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and is FDA approved for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Laboratory studies suggest radiotherapy (RT) may interact with oncolytic immunotherapy to facilitate an immune-mediated anticancer response. We hypothesized that the combination of T-VEC+RT would produce tumor responses in distant (non-irradiated and non-injected) metastases. Methods: A prospective phase II, randomized, Simon two-stage clinical trial of T-VEC with or without RT was conducted with the primary objective of determining if the response rate of the largest non-injected and non-irradiated metastasis was ≥27%. Eligible patients had ≥1 cutaneous metastasis from a solid tumor amenable to T-VEC and RT and 1 measurable metastasis that would not be treated with T-VEC or RT. Using type I and II error probabilities of 10% and 20%, it was calculated that 9 patients would be enrolled in each arm, and if at least 1 of 9 patients subjects exhibited a response, then 6 additional patients would be enrolled in the second stage. Tumor and overall response was assessed using modified World Health Organization (mWHO) and immune related response criteria (irRC). Treatment-emergent and treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs and TRAEs) were characterized using CTCAE v4.0. Results: 19 patients were enrolled and randomized to receive T-VEC alone (n=9) or T-VEC+RT (n=10). One patient in each arm demonstrated a complete response in the largest non-irradiated and non-injected metastasis but progressed in new metastases. The composite response rate in target tumors not injected or irradiated was 13% and 0% in the T-VEC alone and T-VEC+RT arms, respectively. The composite response rate in target tumors treated with T-VEC alone or T-VEC+RT was 7% and 22%, respectively. Because no patient exhibited an overall mWHO or irRC defined response and due to slow accrual, the trial was closed after the first stage of enrollment despite meeting the prespecified response rate to continue enrollment in the second stage. Grade 3-4 TEAEs and TRAEs occurred in 9 and 2 patients, with similar frequencies between study arms. The most common AE was fever and occurred in 47% of patients. Peripheral blood-based immunologic analyses will be presented. Conclusions: The response rate in the largest non-injected or non-irradiated metastasis following T-VEC with or without RT given to a cutaneous metastasis from solid tumor could be ≥27% but was not determined in this trial due to premature closure, in part due to slow accrual rate and no observed mWHO defined overall responses. Cutaneous metastases responded more often after TVEC+RT than T-VEC alone, but the response in non-injected and non-irradiated tumors was more frequent after T-VEC alone. Clinical trial information: NCT02819843 .

Activity of TNT: a phase 2 study using talimogene laherparepvec, nivolumab and trabectedin for previously treated patients with advanced sarcomas (NCT# 03886311).

Intratumoral injection of talimogene laherparepvec evokes a cytotoxic immune response. Therefore, the combination of talimogene laherparepvec with trabectedin and nivolumab may have synergistic effects in advanced sarcomas. This phase 2 trial was conducted from May 30, 2019 to January 31, 2022. Endpoints: Primary: Progression free survival rate at month 12. Secondary: Best overall response, progression free survival rate at 6 and 9 months, overall survival rate at 6, 9, and 12 months, incidence of conversion of an unresectable tumor to a resectable tumor, and incidence of adverse events. Eligible patients had to be ≥ 18 years of age, have advanced histologically proven sarcoma, at least 1 previous chemotherapy regimen, and at least one accessible tumor for intratumoral injection. Treatment: Trabectedin intravenously (1.2 mg/m2 q3 weeks), nivolumab intravenously (3 mg/kg q2 weeks), and intratumoral talimogene laherparepvec (1x108 plaque forming units/ml q2 weeks). Median time of follow-up: 15.2 months. Efficacy analysis: Thirty-nine patients who had completed at least one treatment cycle and had a follow-up computerized tomography were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Median number of prior therapies: 4 (range 1-11). Progression free survival rate at month 12, 36.7%. Confirmed Best Overall Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 = 3 partial responses, 30 stable disease, 6 progressive disease. Best Overall Response Rate, 7.7%, Disease Control Rate, 84.6%; median progression free survival, 7.8 (95% Confidence Intervals: 4.1-13.1) months; 6-, 9-, 12-month progression free survival rates, 54.5%/45.9%/36.7%; median overall survival 19.3 (95% Confidence Intervals: 12.8 -.) months; 6-, 9- and 12-month overall survival rate, 86.9%/73.3%/73.3%. One patient had a complete surgical resection. Fifty percent of patients had a ≥ grade 3 treatment related adverse events which included anemia (6%), thrombocytopenia (6%), neutropenia (4%), increased alanine transaminase (4%), decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (4%), dehydration (4%), hyponatremia (4%). Taken together these data suggest that the TNT regimen is effective and safe for advanced previously treated sarcomas, and is worth being further studied in a randomized phase 3 trial as first- or second- line treatment for patients with advanced sarcomas.

Abstract 3275: Combination of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) with pembrolizumab (pembro) in advanced melanoma patients following progression on a prior PD-1 inhibitor: SWOG S1607

Abstract We hypothesize that a significant number of patients do not respond to PD-1/L1 blockade because there are no pre-existing tumor antigen-specific T-cells, and this can be addressed by combination therapy with an oncolytic virus such as T-VEC. S1607 is a single arm Phase 2 study of T-VEC plus pembro in patients with advanced melanoma after PD-1/L1 inhibitor progression. The primary endpoint is ORR by modified RECIST (progression at the first follow-up disease assessment had to be confirmed). Secondary endpoints include durable response rate (response ≥ 6 months), ORR in injected, non-visceral non-injected, and visceral lesions, PFS, OS and toxicity. In Cohort A patients must have at least one measurable visceral lesion; in Cohort B patients must not have any visceral lesions. Each cohort had an independent accrual goal with a 2-stage design. All received intratumoral T-VEC and pembro 200mg IV every 21 days. Tumor biopsy and research blood are taken at baseline and on Day 28 (both injected and non-injected lesions). Tumor assessments are performed every 12 weeks for up to 2 years. 38 evaluable patients were enrolled. As of July 26, 2022, the median follow up was 28 months. Treatment was well tolerated, with 5/38 (13%) grade 3 AE (no grade 4/5) including injection site reactions, lymphocyte count decrease, and hypoxia. Cohort A was closed after stage I (n=11) with no confirmed responses. In Cohort B (n=27), there were 7 confirmed responses (26%; 2 CR, 5 PR; this rejected H0: ORR = 10%, p=0.01). Clinical outcomes are summarized in Table 1. Baseline tumor mutational burden from 17 patients in Cohort B were not different between responder vs non-responders (p=0.96). Translational study is ongoing for pharmacodynamic confirmation. T-VEC plus pembro in melanoma patients who have progressed on prior anti-PD1/L1 therapy has efficacy in the subset of melanoma patients who have non-visceral metastases. Table 1 Cohort A (Visceral) Cohort B(Non-Visceral) N (%; 95% CI) 11 27 Confirmed PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-28%) 7 (26%; 11%-46%) Confirmed + Unconfirmed 1 (9%; 0%-41%) 9 (33%; 17%-54%) Durable response 0 (0%; 0%-28%) 4 (15%; 4%-34%) Median PFS in months 2.1 (0.7-5.5) 2.3 (1.9-6.2) INJECTED LESIONS 11 27 Confirmed PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-28%) 6 (22%; 9%-42%) Confirmed + Unconfirmed, PR + CR 1 (9%; 0%-41%) 8 (30%; 14%-50%) NON-INJECTED, NON-VISCERAL LESIONS 8 19 Confirmed PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-37%) 3 (16%; 3%-40%) Confirmed + Unconfirmed, PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-37%) 5 (26%; 9%-51%) VISCERAL LESIONS 11 Confirmed PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-28%) Confirmed + Unconfirmed, PR + CR 1 (9%; 0%-41%) ACQUIRED RESISTANCE 3 2 Confirmed PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-71%) 2 (100%; 16%-100%) Confirmed + Unconfirmed, PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-71%) 2 (100%; 16%-100%) Median PFS in months 2.1 (2.0-4.1) NR (8.0-∞) PRIMARY RESISTANCE 8 25 Confirmed PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-37%) 5 (20%; 7%-41%) Confirmed + Unconfirmed, PR + CR 1 (13%; 0%-53%) 7 (28%; 12%-49%) Median PFS in months 1.8 (0.3-6.2) 2.1 (1.9-3.3) Citation Format: Siwen Hu-Lieskovan, James Moon, John Hyngstrom, Katie M. Campbell, Gino K. In, Theodore F. Logan, Kari L. Kendra, Ding M. Wang, Douglas B. Johnson, Gary C. Doolittle, Alan Tan, Ann W. Silk, Kenneth F. Grossmann, Christopher W. Ryan, Sapna P. Patel, Shay Bellasea, Michael C. Wu, John M. Kirkwood, Helen X. Chen, Antoni Ribas. Combination of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) with pembrolizumab (pembro) in advanced melanoma patients following progression on a prior PD-1 inhibitor: SWOG S1607 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3275.

Abstract PD11-04: PD11-04 Primary results of SOLTI-1503 PROMETEO phase 2 trial of Combination of Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) with Atezolizumab in patients with residual breast cancer after standard neoadjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy

Abstract Background: Residual disease (RD) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in early HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) remains an unmet medical need. However, no therapies to date have tested their activity directly in chemo-resistant RD. Here, we hypothesized that combining an oncolytic virus such as T-VEC with atezolizumab may offer clinical benefit in patients (pts) with RD after standard NAC. To our knowledge, PROMETEO is the first trial that examines the activity of immunotherapy in pts with RD prior to surgery. Methods: PROMETEO (NCT03802604) is a single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial. Women with triple-negative BC (TNBC) or hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) BC with baseline (i.e., before NAC) ki67 ≥ 20% were eligible. RD was confirmed with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing a tumor diameter ≥ 10 mm and a core-biopsy detecting the presence of invasive cells. Before surgery, T-VEC was administered intratumorally on week 1 (106 pfu/mL), then in week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter (108 pfu/mL) for 4 injections. Atezolizumab (840 mg) was administered intravenously every 2 weeks for 4 infusions, starting at week 4. Surgery was performed in < 3 weeks after completing the treatment. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination, measured by the rate of residual cancer burden (RCB) class 0/1 at surgery. Tumor samples collected at 5 timepoints (before NAC, during screening period, after first dose of T-VEC, after first dose of T-VEC and atezolizumab and at surgery) were mandatory to assess gene expression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), immune cells PD-L1 IHC (SP142), tumor mutational burden (TMB) by FoundationOne and other translational endpoints. Results: Between Dec 2018 to Feb 2022, 28 pts were enrolled: 20 pts with HR+/HER2- disease and 8 pts with TNBC. Median age was 47 (range 31-71) and 71% of pts were premenopausal. At diagnosis before NAC, clinical stage II disease represented 60.7%, cN+ 60.7%, median Ki-67 was 37.5% (range 20%-95%), high TILs (≥10%) 37%, median TMB was 3 (0-19) and only 1 of 27 pts (3.7%) had a PD-L1-positive tumor. After NAC, mean tumor size by MRI was 28.3 mm (10-93). Two pts discontinued from the trial (1 withdrawal of consent and 1 COVID infection). The completion of 5 cycles of treatment was achieved by 73% of pts. The overall RCB-0/1 rate was 25% (7 of 28, 95% IC 10.7 – 44.9%), all with RCB 0 (pathologic complete response [pCR]). The pCR rate was 30% in HR+/HER2- disease and 12.5 % in TNBC. Radiological response by MRI was achieved by 3 of 28 pts (10.7%). Interestingly, none of the 7 pts with a pCR had radiological response (stable disease n=5, progressive disease [PD] n=2). Six pts (21.4%) had radiological PD and had RCB 2/3. Overall, 27 (96%) patients had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) of any grade. Most common grade 1 or 2 AEs were fever (11 pts, 39.3%), ALT increased (9 pts, 32.1%), AST increased (8 pts, 28.6%), arthralgia (6 pts, 21.4%) and anemia (6 pts, 21.4%). Grade 3 reversible neutropenia occurred in 1 patient. Across all pts, significant increases (p< 0.001) in TILs, immune genes and immune PDL1+ cells were observed after 1 dose of TVEC, 1 dose of the combination and at surgery. Intrinsic subtype changes at surgery occurred in 73.1% of cases, mostly (46.1%) Luminal A/B converting to Normal-like. At surgery, 19 of 26 (73.1%) of tumors were PDL1+. Conclusions: Two months of T-VEC in combination with atezolizumab induced a pCR in a subgroup of pts with chemoresistant HER2- breast cancer. This effect is probably related to the immune activation provoked by the combined treatment. Interestingly, a high discrepancy was observed between the pre-surgical radiological imaging and the actual surgical pathological report. Pre-operative window-of-opportunity trials in this context might provide important clues regarding the activity of novel treatment strategies. Citation Format: Tomás Pascual, Maria Vidal, Juan Miguel Cejalvo, Estela Vega, Esther Sanfeliu, Sergi Ganau, Ana Julve, Esther Zamora, Ignacio Miranda, Ana Delgado, Begoña Bermejo, Luis de la Cruz-Merino, Manel Juan, Patricia Galván, Xavier Gonzalez-Farré, Juan Manuel Ferrero-Cafiero, Patricia Villagrasa, Mafalda Oliveira, Aleix Prat. PD11-04 Primary results of SOLTI-1503 PROMETEO phase 2 trial of Combination of Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) with Atezolizumab in patients with residual breast cancer after standard neoadjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD11-04.

Phase Ib study of talimogene laherparepvec in combination with atezolizumab in patients with triple negative breast cancer and colorectal cancer with liver metastases

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), a first-in-class oncolytic viral immunotherapy, enhances tumor-specific immune activation. T-VEC combined with atezolizumab, which blocks inhibitor T-cell checkpoints, could provide greater benefit than either agent alone. Safety/efficacy of the combination was explored in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) with liver metastases. In this phase Ib, multicenter, open-label, parallel cohort study of adults with TNBC or CRC with liver metastases, T-VEC (106 then 108 PFU/ml; ≤4 ml) was administered into hepatic lesions via image-guided injection every 21 (±3) days. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was given on day 1 and every 21 (±3) days thereafter. Treatment continued until patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), had complete response, progressive disease, needed alternative anticancer treatment, or withdrew due to an adverse event (AE). The primary endpoint was DLT incidence, and secondary endpoints included efficacy and AEs. Between 19 March 2018 and 6 November 2020, 11 patients with TNBC were enrolled (safety analysis set:n= 10); between 19 March 2018 and 16 October 2019, 25 patients with CRC were enrolled (safety analysis set: n= 24). For the 5 patients in the TNBC DLT analysis set, no patient had DLT; for the 18 patients in the CRC DLT analysis set, 3 (17%) had DLT, all serious AEs. AEs were reported by 9 (90%) TNBC and 23 (96%) CRC patients, the majority with grade ≥3 [TNBC, 7 (70%); CRC, 13 (54%)], and 1 was fatal [CRC, 1 (4%)]. Evidence of efficacy was limited. Overall response rate was 10% (95% confidence interval 0.3-44.5) for TNBC; one (10%) patient had a partial response. For CRC, no patients had a response; 14 (58%) were unassessable. The safety profile reflected known risks with T-VEC including risks of intrahepatic injection; no unexpected safety findings from addition of atezolizumab to T-VEC were observed. Limited evidence of antitumor activity was observed.

Neo-adjuvant T-VEC plus nivolumab combination therapy for resectable early-stage or metastatic (IIIB-IVM1a) melanoma with injectable disease: The NIVEC trial.

TPS9607 Background: The prognosis of patients with melanoma is significantly correlated with disease stage and has greatly improved with the introduction of the currently approved therapies. Trials investigating neo-adjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have shown high pathologic response rates up to 25-80%, however, still a large group of patients derive no (durable) clinical benefit. Treatment with talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), a modified herpes simplex virus type-1, is approved for patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma, with high and durable response rates and a mild toxicity profile. Earlier trials have suggested that T-VEC has the capacity to heighten the immune response and to elicit an abscopal effect in melanoma when given in combination with ICI. Combination ICI and intralesional T-VEC has already been investigated in patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IV disease, however, no data is available yet on the potential benefit of this combination therapy in neo-adjuvant setting. This is the first trial investigating the efficacy and safety of neo-adjuvant treatment of T-VEC in combination with nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody), followed by surgical resection in patients with resectable stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma, with the potential of high pathologic response rates and acceptable toxicity. Methods: In this single center, single arm, phase II study, a total of 24 patients ≥18 years of age and a good clinical performance score with treatment naïve, stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma (AJCC 8th edition) with injectable disease and resectable (sub)cutaneous satellite or in-transit metastases and/or tumor positive lymph nodes, will be included. Patients will receive four courses of T-VEC up to 4mL (first dose as seroconversion dose) and three doses of nivolumab (240mg flatdose) every two weeks, followed by surgical resection in week nine. The primary endpoint of this trial is pathologic response rate, with the aim to show a high major pathologic (near-complete or complete) response rate up to 45%. Secondary endpoints are safety according to CTCAE v5.0, the rate of delay of surgery and event free survival. Additionally, prognostic and predictive biomarker research and health-related quality of life evaluation will be performed. Enrollment started in June 2020 in the Netherlands Cancer Institute, with currently 13 of the 24 planned patients treated. Clinical trial information: NCT04330430.

28414 Recurrent melanoma treated with talimogene laherparepvec in combination with radiation therapy: A case report

An 88-year-old female presented with an erythematous, rapidly enlarging 5 cm mass involving her right eyelid. Biopsy revealed this to be a recurrence of her melanoma initially biopsied a year prior. The original lesion was a 1.5 cm ulcerated desmoplastic melanoma with a Breslow thickness of 7.06 mm. Final pathology was stage pT4b pN0. Wide local excision was performed with clear margins and the sentinel lymph node biopsy was negative. No evidence of metastasis was found on repeat imaging. Given the high propensity for aggressive local disease seen in pure desmoplastic melanomas and the difficult anatomic location, treatment with Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) and radiation was pursued given surgical intervention would have required enucleation.

Intratumoral talimogene laherparepvec injection with concurrent preoperative radiation in patients with locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma of the trunk and extremities: phase IB/II trial

BackgroundSoft-tissue sarcomas (STS) in the extremities and trunk treated with standard-of-care preoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by surgical resection are associated with local and distant relapses. In preclinical...

Talimogene laherparepvec with systemic immunotherapy in melanoma: A real-world experience.

e21549 Background: Talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) is an FDA approved oncolytic herpes virus for intralesional therapy in unresectable metastatic melanoma. Real world data is sparse regarding the efficacy of TVEC in combination with other systemic therapies used in melanoma. We present outcomes of the largest single institution observational study of the off-label use of TVEC in combination with systemic immunotherapy. Methods: Patients with metastatic melanoma receiving TVEC simultaneously with ipilimumab-nivolumab (Ipi/Nivo) or single agent immunotherapy (either nivolumab or pembrolizumab) were evaluated. The demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, responses to injected lesions and remote metastatic lesions were evaluated. Clinical documentation was used to assess improvement in injected lesion size; time points for initial response and best response were identified. Review of imaging by a radiologist was evaluated to assess responses in remote metastatic lesions. Results: A total of 67 patients receiving TVEC from 2016 to 2020 were evaluated, of which 50 remained evaluable after excluding Merkel cell carcinoma, patients on clinical trial, TVEC monotherapy or those on BRAF-MEK inhibitors, and patients lost to follow up. In total, 29 received systemic immunotherapy simultaneously with TVEC and had been followed for at least a year, with a median follow-up time of 34 months (range, 12-56). At the time of analysis, 14 of 29 patients were alive. 6 of the 29 patients had received prior lines of therapy. Four patients received Ipi/Nivo, while 25 patients received monotherapy including 9 on nivolumab and 16 on pembrolizumab. The median number of TVEC doses received was 6 (range, 2-55) with median average TVEC dose being 3.47 ml (0.5-4 ml). Median time to initial local response was 6 weeks, whereas time to best local response was 14 weeks. Overall response rate in the injected target lesions was in 19 (66%), with complete local response (CR) in 12 (41%), partial response (PR) in 7 (24%), and progressive disease (PD) in 8 (28%). The response rate in distant non-injected lesions was 4 out of 16 (25%), 2 of which had previously progressed on prior systemic therapy. Stable disease was observed in 8 (50%) patients, and progression of disease in 4 (25%). The 1-year overall survival rate in patients receiving TVEC with systemic monotherapy was 80%, 95% CI 0.651-0.9730. Progression free survival at 1-year in the monotherapy group was 71.6%, 95% CI 0.557-0.918. Conclusions: This is the largest single institution, real world experience to our knowledge, which assesses the efficacy of TVEC in combination with systemic immunotherapy. Our cohort suggests that TVEC is an effective treatment in combination with systemic immunotherapy, with a better overall survival observed with combination TVEC and anti-PD1 than seen with historical data from clinical trials of anti-PD-1 monotherapy.

Abstract OT-13-01: A phase I study of preoperative ipilimumab, nivolumab, and talimogene laherparepvec for localized breast cancer

Abstract Background: Immunotherapy has emerged as a novel therapeutic strategy in many solid malignancies. In breast cancer, treatment with checkpoint inhibitors alone showed minimal response rates, likely because breast cancers are not sufficiently immunogenic to induce adequate baseline T cell activation. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is an attenuated herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) engineered to introduce the GM-CSF gene selectively into tumor cells to thereby enhance the immunogenicity of transduced tumor cells. T-VEC has been approved in the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma and injectable tumors. In a phase 1b clinical trial, T-VEC was well tolerated in combination with immunotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma. We evaluated the safety and tolerability of T-VEC, nivolumab, and ipilimumab in the preoperative treatment of early stage localized triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. Trial design and eligibility criteria: This is a single site open-label phase 1b window of opportunity trial of neoadjuvant T-VEC in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with localized breast cancer. Twenty patients with localized TNBC or HR-positive breast cancer with palpable tumors will be included. T-VEC is administered intratumorally in week 1 (106 plaque-forming units/mL [pfu/ml]) and then every 3 weeks (108 plaque-forming units/mL [pfu/ml]) for a total of 3 injections. Nivolumab (240 mg) is administered intravenously in week 1 and every 2 weeks for a total of 4 infusions. Ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) is administered intravenously in week 1 and week 6 for a total of 2 infusions. Breast cancer surgery will be carried out after completion of study treatment. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be administered before or after study treatment. Study objectives: The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of T-VEC in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab in this population. The secondary objectives are 1) to assess tumor response to T-VEC, nivolumab, and ipilimumab and 2) to descriptively analyze surgical specimens for evidence of tumor necrosis and inflammatory infiltration on histopathological examination. Present accrual: To date, 5 patients have been enrolled. As described above, the projected sample size is 20 patients. Clinical trials identification: NCT04185311 Citation Format: Vina P. Nguyen, Helena R. Chang, Maggie L. DiNome, Denise K. Oseguera, Deborah J. Wong, Anthony T. Nguyen, Stephen L. Shiao, John A. Glaspy. A phase I study of preoperative ipilimumab, nivolumab, and talimogene laherparepvec for localized breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-13-01.

Abstract OT-13-06: Solti-1503 PROMETEO: Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) + atezolizumab combination in early breast cancer

Abstract Background Residual disease (RD) after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is composed of drug resistant cells and associates with increased risk of relapse, especially in triple negative, HER2-positive, and highly proliferative Luminal tumors. Immunotherapy combinations can induce of specific anti-tumor immune responses, such as those mediated by T-cells, and which might represent an additional strategy for the control or elimination of residual tumor cells. Preliminary results in melanoma showed that the combination of T-VEC with an anti PD-L1 or anti CTLA4 has greater efficacy than either therapy alone, without additional safety concerns beyond those expected for each agent. The presence of RD after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in early BC patients remains an unmet medical need. We hypothesize that combining T-VEC with Atezolizumab may offer clinical benefit in the preoperative setting for early breast cancer (BC) patients with intermediate to high risk of recurrence who present RD after standard NAC. Methods SOLTI-1503 PROMETEO is an open-label, multicenter trial of T-VEC + Atezolizumab in patients with RD after completing standard NAC. Thirty patients with triple negative BC (TNBC) or Luminal B-like/HER2- will be included. RD must be confirmed by core-biopsy and have a diameter ≥ 15 mm measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Adequate organ function and ECOG PS 0-1 are required. T-VEC is administered intratumorally in week 1 (106 plaque-forming units/mL [pfu/mL]), then in week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter (108 pfu/mL) for 4 injections. Atezolizumab (840 mg) is administered intravenously every 2 weeks for 4 infusions, beginning in week 4. BC surgery will be carried out 1 to 3 weeks after completion of treatment. A protocol amendment was approved, the steering committee of the study decided to change the primary objective of the trial to a more clinical endpoint that is to evaluate the efficacy by the rate of RCB class 0/1 at surgery. Secondary endpoints include rate of pCR, ORR, safety and the increase of mean expression of a gene signature tracking activated CD8 T-cells. The first safety analysis was performed in October 2019. Independent safety date review board considered the trial safe and supported its continuation. To date, 8 patients have been included at 4 sites in Spain. Second safety and efficacy data analysis is planned after 10 patients have completed treatment. If a rate of PD higher than 50% is observed in the first 10 patients, then the trial will be permanently stopped. We expect to achieve 10 patients in July 2020. We thank AMGEN for their provision of Talimogene Laherparepvec and their financial contribution to this clinical study. We thank ROCHE for their provision of Atezolizumab and their financial contribution to this clinical study. Clinical trial identification: NCT03802604 Citation Format: Tomás Pascual, Juan M Cejalvo, Mafalda Oliveira, Maria Vidal, Estela Vega, Sergi Ganau, Ana Julve, Esther Zamora, Ignacio Miranda, Ana Delgado, Begoña Bermejo, Luis de la Cruz-Merino, Manel Juan, Juan M Ferrero-Cafiero, Jordi Canes, Xavier González-Farré, Patricia Villagrasa, Aleix Prat. Solti-1503 PROMETEO: Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) + atezolizumab combination in early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-13-06.

Abstract 2219: OnxoVEXmGM-CSF promotes systemic response to PD-L1 /PD-1 blockade in multiple mouse syngeneic tumor models

Abstract Inhibition of the immune-checkpoint axis that involves PD-L1/PD-1 has improved responses and outcomes for certain cancer patients, but there remains unmet need as only a fraction of patients respond to these therapies. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is an FDA-approved, first-in-class oncolytic immunotherapy based on a modified herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) designed to selectively replicate in tumors and produce granulocyte-macrophage stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to enhance a tumor-antigen specific adaptive immune response. Intratumoral treatment with T-VEC has been shown to promote an inflammatory tumor microenvironment both preclinically and clinically. Combining T-VEC with immune checkpoint inhibitors is of high interest to potentially broaden and deepen the clinical responses in checkpoint-resistant tumors. In the current study, we evaluated the efficacy of OncoVEXmGM-CSF (an HSV modified like T-VEC, except that it produces murine GM-CSF) in combination with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment in multiple syngeneic mouse tumor models. Bilateral tumor models were used, where only one tumor was treated with OncoVEXmGM-CSF (representing the local oncolytic effect), allowing the evaluation of systemic abscopal effect in the uninjected contralateral tumors. OncoVEXmGM-CSF in combination with anti-PD-L1/PD-1 enhanced tumor growth inhibition in both treated and contralateral tumors in the A20 and MC38 syngeneic models and overcame anti-PD-L1 resistance in the CT26 model. The combination treatment also led to a significant increase in median overall survival compared to either agent as a monotherapy. In addition, tumor antigen epitopes were identified by combining exome sequencing and MHC/HLA-binding prediction algorithms. Antigen-specific T cell response was measured in an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay using splenocytes from treated mice. OncoVEXmGM-CSF induced and /or enhanced systemic T cell responses directed against both tumor neoantigens and tumor-associated antigens. Together, these data reveal that OncoVEXmGM-CSF treatment can cause direct tumor lysis along with the potentiation of an adaptive, systemic T cell-mediated anti-tumor immune response that can be enhanced by the addition of PD-L1/PD-1. Our study provides a strong rationale for the ongoing clinical evaluation of the combination of T-VEC and PD1-/PD-L1-targeted therapy in cancer patients. Citation Format: Keegan Cooke, Juan Estrada, Petia Mitchell, Jinghiu Zhan, Pedro J. Beltran, Jing Qing, Jude Canon. OnxoVEXmGM-CSF promotes systemic response to PD-L1 /PD-1 blockade in multiple mouse syngeneic tumor models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2219.

An Update on the Role of Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) in the Treatment of Melanoma: Best Practices and Future Directions.

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is the first agent approved for cancer in the emerging class of oncolytic viral therapies. While T-VEC was approved for the treatment of advanced melanoma in 2015, clinical utilization has been hampered by rapid changes in the therapeutic landscape of melanoma related to advances in both immune checkpoint blockade and targeted therapy, cumbersome logistics involved in T-VEC administration, biosafety concerns, and a perception that T-VEC has limited impact on uninjected, visceral disease. However, with further survival follow-up from the phase III OPTiM (OncovexGM-CSF Pivotal Trial in Melanoma), along with new real-world data and consensus guidelines on safe administration of oncolytic viruses, a roadmap for when and how to use T-VEC has been emerging. In addition, preliminary data have demonstrated improved therapeutic responses to T-VEC in combination with immune checkpoint blockade in patients with melanoma without additive toxicity. This review provides an update on recent data with T-VEC alone and in combination with other agents. The emerging data provide guidance for how to better utilize T-VEC for patients with melanoma and identifies critical areas for clinical investigation to expand the role of T-VEC in combination strategies for the treatment of melanoma and perhaps other cancers.

SOLTI-1503 PROMETEO TRIAL: combination of talimogene laherparepvec with atezolizumab in early breast cancer.

New treatment strategies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and oncolytic viruses are opening new possibilities in cancer therapy. Preliminary results in melanoma and other tumors showed that the combination of talimogene laherparepvec with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 or anti-CTLA4 has greater efficacy than either therapy alone, without additional safety concerns beyond those expected for each agent. The presence of residual cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients is an unmet medical need. SOLTI-1503 PROMETEO is a window of opportunity trial, which evaluates the combination of talimogene laherparepvec in combination with atezolizumab in women with operable HER2-negative breast cancer who present residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary end point is the rate of residual cancer burden 0/1. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03802604.

Early safety from a phase I, multicenter, open-label clinical trial of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) injected (inj) into liver tumors in combination with pembrolizumab (pem).

3015 Background: T-VEC is a genetically modified, oncolytic HSV-1 designed to selectively replicate within tumors and produce GM-CSF to enhance systemic antitumor immunity. The safety and efficacy of T-VEC in treatment of advanced melanoma has been demonstrated as monotherapy and in combination with checkpoint inhibitors (Andtbacka JCO 2015, Chesney JCO 2017, Ribas Cell 2017). T-VEC has also demonstrated tolerable safety for intrahepatic inj (Hecht JCO 2018). This phase 1b, multicenter, open-label, dose escalation study (NCT02509507) evaluates the safety of intrahepatic inj of T-VEC in combination with intravenous (IV) pem in patients (pts) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver metastases (mets). Methods: The primary objective is to assess the maximum tolerated concentration (MTC) of T-VEC inj into liver tumors based on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). DLT rate was evaluated with the mTPI up-and-down design. Eligible pts were ≥ 18 years, had progressive HCC or breast cancer, colorectal cancer, gastroesophageal cancer, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, or renal cell cancer liver mets, with measurable liver tumors suitable for inj. This dose escalation study comprised 2 groups: A (non-HCC) and B (HCC). T-VEC was given initially at 106 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL followed by up to 4 mL of 107 PFU/mL (cohort 5) or 108 PFU/mL (cohort 6) every 21 (±3) days (Q21D). Inj volume was based on lesion size. Pem (200 mg) was given IV Q21D. Results: Here we report on three cohorts: A5 (107 PFU/mL T-VEC + pem), A6 (108 PFU/mL T-VEC + pem), and B5 (107 PFU/mL T-VEC + pem). Twenty-nine pts were treated: 7 in A5, 17 in A6, 5 in B5. Median age was 61 years (range: 30, 76). Median number of inj was 4 and median treatment duration was 88 days. One DLT of cholestatic hepatitis was observed out of 6 DLT evaluable pts in cohort A5. No DLTs were observed in cohort A6 and B5. MTC was 108 PFU/mL in non-HCC patients; exploration of MTC in the HCC population is ongoing. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were consistent across cohorts. The most common treatment-emergent treatment-related adverse events (TETRAE) were pyrexia (79.3%), chills (37.9%), and nausea (37.9%). Eight pts (27.6%) had grade 3/4 TEAEs: 2pts (6.9%) related to the combination therapy and the rest not related to treatment. No fatal AEs were observed. Conclusions: T-VEC intrahepatic inj in combination with IV pem at standard doses has thus far been demonstrated as feasible and tolerable to continue further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT02509507 .

Oncolytic Viruses for the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma.

There is an unmet need for additional treatments for metastatic melanoma, besides anti-PD1 antibodies which are FDA approved for adjuvant therapy for stage III or resected stage IV melanoma. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is the first and only FDA-approved oncolytic virus for the treatment of melanoma. New viral vectors including coxsackieviruses, HF-10, adenovirus, reovirus, echovirus, and newcastle disease virus are currently under active development and investigation with varying degrees of efficacy in targeting melanoma. The use of T-VEC as a neoadjuvant therapy is emerging, but more data is needed at this point. T-VEC has also shown promise for use in combination therapy with ipilimumab, as T-VEC plus ipilimumab has a significantly higher objective response compared to ipilimumab alone. Data comparing T-VEC in combination with PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors is awaited, and a phase III trial is underway. It is likely that oncolytic viruses will have long-term application in the treatment of melanoma and that T-VEC in particular will continue to have a role in the treatment of patients with readily accessible cutaneous lesions both for local control and synergistic induction of antitumor immunity as part of combination therapies.

Abstract OT1-01-01: SOLTI-1503 PROMETEO: Combination of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) with atezolizumab in patients with residual breast cancer after standard neoadjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy

Abstract Background: New strategies as immune blockade inhibitors and oncolytic viruses are opening new possibilities in cancer therapy. Preliminary results in melanoma showed that the combination of Talimogene Laherparevec (T-VEC) with an anti PD-L1 or anti CTLA4 has greater efficacy than either therapy alone, without additional safety concerns beyond those expected for each individual agent. The presence of residual cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in early breast cancer (BC) patients is an unmet medical need. We hypothesize that combining T-VEC with Atezolizumab may offer clinical benefit in the preoperative setting for early BC patients with intermediate to high risk of recurrence who present residual disease (RD) after standard NAC. Methods: PROMETEO is an open-label, multicenter trial of T-VEC in combination with Atezolizumab in patients with residual disease after completing standard NAC. 30 patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) or Luminal B-like/Her2- (ER/PR>10% and Ki-67 ≥30% or ER/PR 1-10% and Ki-67 ≥20%) will be included. RD must be confirmed by core-biopsy and have a diameter ≥ 15mm measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Adequate organ function and ECOG PS 0-1 are required. T-VEC is administered intratumorally in week 1 (106 plaque-forming units/mL [pfu/mL]), then in week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter (108 pfu/mL) for four injections. Atezolizumab (840 mg) is administered intravenously every 2 weeks for four infusions, beginning in week 4. BC surgery will be carried out 1 to 3 weeks after completion of study treatment. Primary objective is to evaluate the effect of T-VEC + Atezolizumab by comparing the expression of a gene signature tracking activated CD8 T-cells between RD at surgery and RD after NAC. We expect a relative increase of ≥20% in the expression of this CD8 T-cell gene signature in 20% of patients or more, defined as the mean expression of PRF1, CD8A, GZMM, CD8B and FLT3LG, between post and pre-treatment samples. Secondary endpoints include pathologic complete response rate and residual cancer burden, objective response rate, and safety. Two safety data reviews - after 4 and 10 patients complete treatment - are planned. A total of 4 sites in Spain are participating in the trial. To date, 4 patients have been included and it is expected to complete the first safety data review in September 2019. The study recruitment is planned to be completed by October 2020. Clinical trial identification: NCT03802604 Citation Format: Tomás Pascual, Patricia Villagrasa, María J Vidal, Sergi Ganau, Begoña Bermejo, Ana Julve, Esther Zamora, Ignacio Miranda, Estela Vega, Cristina Marquez, Mafalda Oliveira, Juan Miguel Cejalvo, Luis de la Cruz, Manel Juan, Jordi Canes, Xavier Gonzalez, Aleix Prat. SOLTI-1503 PROMETEO: Combination of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) with atezolizumab in patients with residual breast cancer after standard neoadjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-01-01.

Abstract P3-09-19: Preliminary safety data of intrahepatic talimogene laherparepvec and intravenous atezolizumab in patients with triple negative breast cancer

Abstract Background Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a genetically modified, oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1 designed to selectively replicate within tumors and to produce granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to enhance systemic antitumor immune responses. The safety and efficacy of T-VEC in treatment of advanced melanoma has been demonstrated as monotherapy and in combination with the checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) pembrolizumab and ipilimumab. Additionally, T-VEC monotherapy has demonstrated tolerable safety for intrahepatic injection (Hecht GICS 2018). Atezolizumab (atezo) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity by targeting programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and is approved for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC). We hypothesize that T-VEC in combination with a CPI may be effective in mTNBC and CRC in addition to melanoma. This phase 1b, multicenter study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03256344) evaluates the safety of intrahepatic injection of T-VEC in combination with intravenous (IV) atezo in patients (pts) with mTNBC or colorectal cancer (CRC) with liver metastases (LMs). Here we report early safety data in the TNBC cohort. Methods Key eligibility criteria included age ≥ 18 years, confirmed diagnosis of TNBC or CRC with LMs, ECOG PS 0/1, adequate organ function, disease progression during or after ≥ 1 prior standard-of-care systemic therapy for metastatic disease, and ≥ 1 measurable LM suitable for injection. T-VEC (≤ 4mL) was injected by image-guided intralesional injection: 106 PFU/mL day 1, 108 PFU/mL every 21 days thereafter; atezo 1,200 mg IV was given on day 1 and every 21 days thereafter. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate incidence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) for safety of T-VEC injection into LMs in combination with IV atezo, by tumor type. The DLT analysis set included DLT-evaluable pts who were on treatment for at least 6 weeks from the initial dose of study treatment and received at least 2 doses of T-VEC and 2 doses of atezo in combination or have a DLT during the DLT evaluation period. Key secondary objectives include objective response rate, durable response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival of the combination therapy, by tumor type. Results Thirty-two pts were enrolled in two parallel cohorts (8 TNBC, 24 CRC). Of the 8 TNBC pts, 4 were evaluable for DLT at the time of this analysis. Of the 4 pts that were not DLT-evaluable, 1 never received study drug, 1 received atezo monotherapy, and 2 received intrahepatic T-VEC and IV atezo but stopped study drugs for unconfirmed progression before the DLT evaluation period was completed. No DLTs were reported in the TNBC cohort. In the 7 TNBC pts who received at least one dose of the study drug, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in terms of the subject incidence were pyrexia (71.4%), chills (42.9%), and rash (42.9%). In the 7 TNBC pts who received at least one dose of study drug, T-VEC related AEs in more than one pt were pyrexia (n=3) and chills (n=2). Atezo related AEs in more than one pt were pyrexia (n=5), chills and rash (n=3 each), and fatigue, arthralgia, pain, and pruritus (n=2 each). Study drug-related serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 3 (42.9%) pts, including Grade (G) 3 hypersensitivity related to atezo, G3 orthostatic hypotension related to T-VEC and atezo, and G1 pyrexia related to T-VEC and atezo. Procedure-related SAEs occurred in 1 (14.3%) pt, of G3 hepatic hematoma and G3 abdominal infection, but these were not related to the study drugs. One confirmed partial response in the TNBC cohort has been seen thus far. Conclusion T-VEC intrahepatic injection in combination with IV atezo at standard doses has thus far been demonstrated as feasible and tolerable with no DLTs observed in the TNBC cohort to date. Citation Format: Joel Randolph Hecht, Arlene Chan, Jean-Francois Baurain, Miguel Martin, Federico Longo-Munoz, Kevin Kalinsky, Steven Raman, Chunxu Liu, Edward Cha, Emily Chan. Preliminary safety data of intrahepatic talimogene laherparepvec and intravenous atezolizumab in patients with triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-19.

Objective Response Rate Among Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Sarcoma Treated With Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination With Pembrolizumab

Patients with advanced sarcoma have limited treatment options. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) has been shown to increase tumor-specific immune activation via augmenting antigen presentation and T-cell priming. To examine whether T-VEC in combination with pembrolizumab is associated with increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte infiltration and programmed death-ligand 1 expression and thus with increased antitumor activity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma. This open-label, single-institution phase 2 interventional trial of T-VEC plus pembrolizumab enrolled 20 patients with locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma between March 16 and December 4, 2017, for whom at least 1 standard systemic therapy had failed. The median duration of therapy was 16 weeks (range, 7-67 weeks). Reported analyses include data through December 14, 2018. Patients received pembrolizumab (200-mg flat dose) intravenously and T-VEC (first dose, ≤4 mL × 106 plaque-forming units [PFU]/mL; second and subsequent doses, ≤4 mL × 108 PFU/mL) injected into palpable tumor site(s) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR; complete response and partial response) at 24 weeks determined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, criteria. Secondary end points included best ORR by immune-related RECIST criteria, progression-free survival rate at 24 weeks, overall survival, and safety. All 20 patients (12 women [60%]; median age, 63.5 years [range, 24-90 years]) were evaluable for response. The study met its primary end point of evaluating the best ORR at 24 weeks determined by RECIST, version 1.1, criteria; the best ORR was 30% (95% CI, 12%-54%; n = 6). The ORR overall was 35% (95% CI, 15%-59%; n = 7). The incidence of grade 3 treatment-related adverse events was low (4 patients [20%]). There were no grade 4 treatment-related adverse events or treatment-related deaths. In this phase 2 clinical trial, treatment with T-VEC plus pembrolizumab was associated with antitumor activity in advanced sarcoma across a range of sarcoma histologic subtypes, with a manageable safety profile. This combination therapy met its predefined primary study end point; further evaluation of T-VEC in combination with pembrolizumab for patients with select sarcoma subtypes is planned. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03069378.

Patterns of response with talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone in metastatic unresectable melanoma

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) has demonstrated efficacy for unresectable melanoma. We explored response patterns from a phase 2 study evaluating patients with unresectable stage IIIB–IVM1c malignant melanoma who received T-VEC plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone. Patients with objective response per modified irRC were evaluated for pseudo-progression (single ≥25% increase in tumour burden before response). Patients without pseudo-progression were classified by whether they responded within or after 6 months of treatment start; those with pseudo-progression were classified by whether pseudo-progression was due to increase in existing lesions or development of new lesions. Overall, 39% (n = 38/98) in the combination arm and 18% (n = 18/100) in the ipilimumab arm had an objective response. Eight responders (combination, n = 7 [18.4%]; ipilimumab, n = 1 [5.6%]) had pseudo-progression; most occurred by week 12 and were caused by an increase in existing lesions. These data reinforce use of T-VEC through initial progression when combined with checkpoint inhibitors.Trial Registration NCT01740297 (ClinicalTrials.gov; date of registration, December 4, 2012); 2012-000307-32 (ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu; date of registration, May 13, 2014).