Combination Of Statins Research Articles

Combination of moderate-intensity statins and ezetimibe versus high-intensity statins alone for primary prevention of cardiovascular events

Abstract Background Combination of a moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe can lead to similar reductions in cardiovascular events as monotherapy with a high-intensity statin in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The comparative effectiveness of these two cholesterol-lowering strategies in the primary prevention setting is unknown. Purpose To compare incident ASCVD events associated with a combination of moderate-intensity statin and ezetimibe versus monotherapy with a high-intensity statin in adults without prior history of cardiovascular disease. Methods We conducted a new-user active comparator retrospective population-based cohort study in Canada. We included all adults aged ≥ 67 years (eligible for drug coverage) with a first prescription of either a combination of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe ("combination therapy") or high-intensity statin alone between January 2010 and December 2022. Patients were excluded if they had not received any prior lipid lowering therapies or had a history of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease or prior coronary revascularisation at any time before or within 3 months of treatment initiation. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, hospitalization for MI or stroke, or coronary revascularization. An inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score was used to account for confounding (demographics, comorbidities, laboratory tests, other medications). Results Among 67,884 patients (mean age: 74.0±5.5y; 53% females), 8,798 (13%) initiated combination therapy and 59,086 (87%) initiated a high-intensity statin. At 1 year, after weighting, the mean achieved LDL-C was ~1.9 mmol/L in both groups. The median follow-up was 6.5 years. The cumulative incidence of the primary outcome at 10 years in the weighted cohort was 32.7% in the combination therapy group and 36.1% in the high-intensity statin group (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.82 to 0.92; p<0.001; absolute risk reduction: 3.5%; 95% CI: 0.8 to 6.1; Figure 1). This result was primarily driven by a lower risk of all-cause death (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.91; p<0.001; Figure 2) and stroke (cause-specific [cs] HR: 0.86; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.99; p=0.04), whereas no differences were observed in the risk of MI (csHR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.15) or coronary revascularization (csHR: 0.97; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.11). Conclusion The combination of moderate-intensity statins with ezetimibe was associated with a lower risk of incident ASCVD compared with high-intensity statins alone among primary prevention patients in a real-world setting. These results were driven by a lower risk of all-cause death and stroke, but not coronary events. The influence of statin intolerance on the allocated strategy and adherence to therapy cannot be addressed in this analysis, which, along with verifying these estimates, may be best determined in a prospective randomized trial.

Moderate-intensity statin combined with ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin monotherapy for secondary cardiovascular risk reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Introduction Intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol levels is recommended for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) [1]. Statins are the first-line therapy for secondary prevention [1]. Recent studies such as the RACING trial suggest that the combination of moderate-intensity statins and ezetimibe (MIS+EZE) may achieve a greater LDL cholesterol reduction and a lower adverse event rate than high-intensity statins alone (HIS) [2]. Purpose The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess cardiovascular outcomes and clinical safety of MIS+EZE versus HIS in patients with ASCVD. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane and Embase for studies that compared MIS+EZE to HIS in patients with ASCVD and included studies reporting cardiovascular mortality, all cause mortality, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary revascularization, heart failure, and LDL-C ≤ 70mg/dL. Studies with the same statin dose in both treatment groups and studies with overlapping populations were excluded. Treatment effects for binary endpoints were compared using pooled risk-ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results Out of 6238 studies, we included 6 RCTs and 2 retrospective cohort studies with 40,236 patients of whom 10,254 were treated with MIS+EZE (25,5%). Mean follow-up ranged from 90 days to 3 years. Cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.83; CI95% 0.73-0.94; p=0.003), all-cause mortality (RR 0.90; CI95% 0.82-0.98; p=0.02) and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.83; CI95% 0.73-0.93; p=0.002) were significantly lower in patients treated with MIS+EZE compared to those treated with HIS. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the MIS+EZE group reached an LDL-C ≤ 70mg/dL (RR 1.26; CI95% 1.19-1.34; p<0.00001). No statistically significant difference was found for non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.87; CI95% 0.64-1.17; p=0.36), coronary revascularization (RR 1.03; CI95% 0.78-1.35; p=0.83), heart failure (RR 0.95; CI95% 0.86-1.06; p=0.38) and unstable angina (RR 1.52; CI95% 0.62-3.75; p=0.36). A RCT sub-analysis was feasible for cardiovascular mortality and showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (RR 1.01; CI95% 0.42-2.42; p=0.98). Regarding safety endpoints, the risk of adverse events (RR 0.84; CI95% 0.74-0.95; p=0.004) and the risk of muscle-related adverse events (RR 0.67; CI95% 0.49-0.92; p=0.01) were significantly lower in MIS+EZE group. The significant reduction in muscle-related adverse events was maintained in the RCT sub-analysis (RR 0.61; CI95% 0.41-0.91; p=0.02). There was no difference between groups in the risk of liver-related adverse events (RR 0.63; CI95% 0.29-1.41; p=0.26) or new-onset malignancy (RR 0.99; CI95% 0.87-1.12; p=0.85). Conclusion The combination of moderate-intensity statins and ezetimibe may be considered as an alternative therapeutic strategy to reduce secondary cardiovascular risk with lower rates of drug intolerance.

The upfront lipid-lowering combination therapy of statins and ezetimibe vs statin monotherapy in the reduction of cardiovascular outcomes. A meta-analysis.

Abstract Background Despite some data in last few years, there is still some inconsistency concerning the effectiveness and safety of the upfront intensive lipid lowering combination therapy (LLT; of moderate to high intensity statin therapy and ezetimibe) in comparison to high intensity statin therapy and recommended by some guidelines stepwise therapy approach. Purpose We sought to evaluate the efficacy of combination LLT compared with statin monotherapy for cardiovascular outcomes, LDL-C reduction, and associated adverse events. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrial.gov to identify relevant articles published from inception until 29th December 2023. The outcomes were assessed using pooled odds ratio (OR) for categorical data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results A total of 11 studies (8 randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies) with 106,358 were involved in the analysis. The mean age of the patients in the combination LLT and statin monotherapy group was 65.3 and 65.7 years, respectively. Pooled analysis shows that combination LLT significantly reduces the LDL-C level from the baseline (MD, -12.13 mg/dl [0.31 mmol/l] (95%CI: -18.26 to -5.99 mg/dl), p<0.001), all-cause mortality (ACM) (OR, 0.75, 95%CI: 0.62 to 0.92, p=0.01), cardiovascular mortality (CVM) (OR 0.75, 95%CI: 0.66 to 0.84, p<0.001), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR, 0.72 95%CI: 0.63 to 0.82, p<0.001), non-significant reduction in the incidence of stroke (OR 0.82, 95%CI: 0.66 to 1.01, p=0.06) when compared with statin monotherapy alone. Similarly, the therapy discontinuation rate was comparable between combination LLT and statin monotherapy groups (OR, 0.87 (95%CI: 0.53 to 1.40), p=0.56). The risk of adverse events related to the gastrointestinal tract (OR, 1.12 (95%CI: 0.93 to 1.36), p=0.23) and musculoskeletal system (OR, 0.88 (95%CI: 0.52 to 1.50), p=0.65) was comparable between both the groups of patients. Conclusion Combination LLT was associated with an overall greater reduction in LDL-C, a lower risk of ACM, MACE, and CVM compared to statin monotherapy alone.Forest Plot of desired outcomes.Central illustration with key findings.

Three decades of lipid-lowering therapy in type 2 diabetic patients with angiographically proven stable coronary artery disease

Abstract Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is key to reducing the burden of macrovascular diabetes complications. Here, we aim to assess long-term trends in LLT and LDL-C levels among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with angiographically proven coronary artery disease (CAD). We investigated T2DM patients (n=590), who were referred to elective coronary angiography and were diagnosed with CAD in one of three observational cohort studies (OS) spanning 25 years: OS1: 1999-2000 (n=190); OS2: 2005-2008 (n=241); OS3: 2022-2023 (n=159). These studies were conducted at the same cardiology unit of a tertiary care hospital in Central Europe. The proportion of patients receiving statin therapy (C10AA and C10AB) increased significantly from 57.9% in OS1 to 64.3% in OS2 and 78.6% in OS3 (ptrend<0.001). Further, there was an increase in patients receiving high-intensity statin therapy, rising from none in OS1 to 8.5% in OS2 and 73.4% in OS3 (ptrend<0.001). The proportion of patients receiving more than one LLT compound also increased (OS1: 2.1%; OS2: 2.1%; OS3: 35.2%; ptrend<0.001). Use of ezetimibe (C10AX09) increased (OS1: 0.0%; OS2: 1.2%; OS3: 39.0%; ptrend<0.001) and fibrate use (C10AB) decreased (OS1: 5.3%; OS2: 3.3%; OS3: 0.6%; ptrend=0.015). Newly approved compounds (C10AX13 - C10AX16) were prescribed for 3.8% of patients in OS3. Among statin combination therapies, ezetimibe was predominantly used (93.5%). Mean LDL-C levels declined significantly from 123±38 mg/dL (OS1) to 115±39 mg/dL (OS2) and 77±38 mg/dL (OS3; ptrend<0.001). However, only 2.2% of patients in OS1, 2.5% in OS2 and 32.1% in OS3 reached an LDL-C target of <55 mg/dL (ptrend<0.001). This analysis suggests an upward trend in treatment intensity and a substantial improvement in LDL-C levels among T2DM patients with CAD. However, the majority of these patients still does not reach their LDL-C target.

Immunomodulation by the combination of statin and matrix-bound nanovesicle enhances optic nerve regeneration

Modulating inflammation is critical to enhance nerve regeneration after injury. However, clinically applicable regenerative therapies that modulate inflammation have not yet been established. Here, we demonstrate synergistic effects of the combination of an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, statin/fluvastatin and critical components of the extracellular matrix, Matrix-Bound Nanovesicles (MBV) to enhance axon regeneration and neuroprotection after mouse optic nerve injury. Mechanistically, co-intravitreal injections of fluvastatin and MBV robustly promote infiltration of monocytes and neutrophils, which lead to RGC protection and axon regeneration. Furthermore, monocyte infiltration is triggered by elevated expression of CCL2, a chemokine, in the superficial layer of the retina after treatment with a combination of fluvastatin and MBV or IL-33, a cytokine contained within MBV. Finally, this therapy can be further combined with AAV-based gene therapy blocking anti-regenerative pathways in RGCs to extend regenerated axons. These data highlight novel molecular insights into the development of immunomodulatory regenerative therapy.

Evaluating the Efficacy of a Pre-Established Lipid-Lowering Algorithm in Managing Hypercholesterolemia in Patients at Very High Cardiovascular Risk.

Recent data from European studies (EUROASPIRE V, DA VINCI, SANTORINI) indicate that achieving the LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) target in patients at very high cardiovascular risk is uncommon. Additionally, using a combination therapy involving statins and ezetimibe remains infrequent. A single-center assessment of a pre-defined lipid lowering treatment algorithm's effectiveness at achieving the LDL-C target in patients at very high cardiovascular risk one month and one year after hospitalization. 81 patients were included, all in secondary prevention. The average age of the patient was 66.9 years, and the main cardiovascular risk factors included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and smoking history. Following the predefined lipid-lowering algorithm specific to our study, which involves initiating high-intensity statin therapy or a combination of statin and ezetimibe depending on initial LDL-C levels and patient history; 30 (37%) patients initiated high-intensity statin therapy (Atorvastatin (40 mg, 80 mg) or Rosuvastatin (20 mg, 40 mg)), while 51 (63%) started combination therapy with high-intensity statin and ezetimibe 10 mg. After one year, 57 (70.4%) remained adherent to their initial treatment, achieving a mean LDL-C of 49.5 ± 16.9 mg/dL, with 36 (63.2%) of them reaching the LDL-C target of <55 mg/dL. A total of 13 patients discontinued treatment, and 9 were lost to follow-up, withdrew from the study, or died. Initiating dual statin and ezetimibe therapy or high-intensity statin therapy early, based on the expected treatment efficacy, holds the potential to more rapidly and effectively achieve LDL-C targets in a larger proportion of very high-risk cardiovascular patients.

Targeting ferroptosis for improved radiotherapy outcomes in HPV‐negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

To enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) in human papillomavirus (HPV)‐negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), we explored targeting ferroptosis, a regulated cell death process. We developed a gene signature associated with ferroptosis using Cox proportional hazard modeling in HPV‐negative HNSCC patients who underwent RT. This ferroptosis‐related gene signature (FRGS) was a significant predictor of overall survival and recurrence‐free survival in HPV‐negative HNSCC patients who received RT. Subtype B of the FRGS, characterized by decreased expression of ferroptosis inducers [nuclear receptor coactivator 4 (NCOA4) and natural resistance‐associated macrophage protein 2 homolog/divalent metal transporter 1 (NRAMP2/DMT1)] and increased expression of suppressors [phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase (GPX4) and ferritin heavy chain (FTH1)], was associated with poorer prognosis, potentially indicating the inhibition of ferroptosis. Furthermore, our in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that treatment with statins, such as atorvastatin and simvastatin, induced ferroptosis and sensitized radioresistant HNSCC cells to irradiation, improving radiosensitivity and potentially enhancing the response to RT. Additionally, in xenograft models, the combination of statins and RT led to a significant reduction in tumor initiation. These findings provide valuable insights for enhancing treatment and improving prognosis in HPV‐negative HNSCC by targeting ferroptosis and utilizing statins to sensitize tumors to RT‐induced cell death.

Indicators of functional state of liver, blood lipid spectrum in patients with steatotic liver disease associated with metabolic dysfunction: modern approaches to complex treatment. Review

Objective — to study the dynamics of indicators of the functional state of the liver, the lipid spectrum of the blood, to evaluate the cardiovascular risk according to SCORE‑2 (Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation 2) scale under the influence of complex pathogenetic treatment of the detected disorders in patients with steatotic liver disease associated with metabolic dysfunction (SLDMD) in combination with obesity. Materials and methods. 46 outpatients with a diagnosis SLDMD were examined: 29 (63.1%) men and 17 (36.9%) women aged 32—55 years. The patients were divided into two groups. The main group included 19 (41.3%) persons who received atorvastatin: 20 mg/day for 90 days. The comparison group consisted of 27 (58.7%) patients who were prescribed ursodeoxycholic acid preparations in combination with atorvastatin: 250 mg (15 mg/kg of body weight) for 90 days. The control group consisted of 12 healthy persons of the appropriate age. The anthropometric criterion of obesity was the Quetelet index. Phenotypic variant of obesity was determined by the ratio of waist circumference/hip circumference (WC/HC). Among the patients of the main group, there were 9 (47.4%) persons with I degree of obesity ((32.6±2.2) kg/m2), 6 (31.5%) persons with II degree ( 35.8±3.6 kg/m2), and 4 (21.1%) persons with III degree (40.0±2.1kg/m2), in the comparison group there were 17 (62.9%), 6 (22.3%) and 4 (14.8%) patients, respectively. All patients received a differentiated diet with the calculation of the energy value, the quota of protein (1.4—1.6 g), fat (1.2—1.4 g), carbohydrates (2—3 g) per 1 kg of ideal body weight and dosed physical activity. For assessing the indicators of the functional state of the disease we determined: the level of general bilirubin and its fractions (direct and indirect), activity of serum aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase, total cholesterol content in the blood serum, high‑density lipoprotein cholesterol, low‑density lipoprotein cholesterol, very‑low‑density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides. Results. In the majority of patients with SLDMD, a statistically significant (p &lt;0.05) increase in the level of direct bilirubin in the blood, the activity of hepatic transaminases, alkaline phosphatase, and changes in the lipid spectrum of the blood were detected. According to the body mass index (BMI) most of the examined patients had visceral obesity. After the course of the combined therapy positive dynamics was marked in biochemical indices of the blood (p &lt;0.05): decrease of the direct bilirubin level, hepatic transaminases, blood phosphatase. The lipid spectrum of the blood was close to normal (p &lt;0.05). The addition of ursodeoxycholic acid to statin therapy contributes to a statistically significant reduction in total cardiovascular risk according to the SCORE 2 scale compared with atorvastatin monotherapy. All patients were recommended to continue the course of treatment (combination of atorvastatin and ursodeoxycholic acid) for 2 to 3 months. Conclusions. The use of a combination of statin and ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of patients with SLDMD and obesity helps to normalise the functional state of the liver and blood lipid parameters, reduce the degree of overall cardiovascular risk, and achieve clinical and biochemical remission of the pathological process in the liver.

Study Design and Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of a Triple Combination of Ezetimibe, Fenofibrate, and Moderate-Intensity Statin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors (ENSEMBLE).

Atherogenic dyslipidemia, which is frequently associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and insulin resistance, contributes to the development of vascular complications. Statin therapy is the primary approach to dyslipidemia management in T2D, however, the role of non-statin therapy remains unclear. Ezetimibe reduces cholesterol burden by inhibiting intestinal cholesterol absorption. Fibrates lower triglyceride levels and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels via peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor alpha agonism. Therefore, when combined, these drugs effectively lower non-HDL-C levels. Despite this, few clinical trials have specifically targeted non-HDL-C, and the efficacy of triple combination therapies, including statins, ezetimibe, and fibrates, has yet to be determined. This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, active-comparator controlled trial involving 3,958 eligible participants with T2D, cardiovascular risk factors, and elevated non-HDL-C (≥100 mg/dL). Participants, already on moderate-intensity statins, will be randomly assigned to either Ezefeno (ezetimibe/fenofibrate) addition or statin dose-escalation. The primary end point is the development of a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and diabetic microvascular events over 48 months. This trial aims to assess whether combining statins, ezetimibe, and fenofibrate is as effective as, or possibly superior to, statin monotherapy intensification in lowering cardiovascular and microvascular disease risk for patients with T2D. This could propose a novel therapeutic approach for managing dyslipidemia in T2D.

Porokeratoses: an update on pathogenesis and treatment.

Porokeratoses (PK) are a group of uncommon dermatoses characterized by abnormal epidermal differentiation due to a disorder of the mevalonate metabolic pathway. Several clinical subtypes exist that can be associated with the same patient or affect different patients within a family and could, therefore, be different expressions of one disease. All PK subtypes share a common histopathologic finding, the cornoid lamella, a vertical stack of parakeratotic corneocytes embedded in an orthokeratotic horny layer. PK often affects immunosuppressed patients, in whom the course may parallel the level of immunosuppression. The pathogenesis of PK, which had long remained mysterious, has been recently unraveled after discovering pathogenic variants of genes involved in the mevalonate metabolic pathway. The disease is due to germline pathogenic variants of genes of this pathway but requires a second-hit event to manifest; therefore, PK is considered a dominantly inherited but recessively expressed condition. The prognosis of PK is usually favorable, even though the lesions progress to keratinocyte carcinomas in 7%-16% of patients. The treatment of PK was based on physical (ablative) procedures and various (topical or systemic) treatments, whose efficacy is nevertheless inconsistent and often temporary. The discovery of the metabolic pathway involved in the pathogenesis of PK paved the way for the elaboration of new topical treatments (combination of statins and cholesterol), which are more regularly efficacious compared with older treatments, even though the management of some patients with PK may still be challenging.

Prognostic impact of high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy under-prescription after acute myocardial infarction in women.

Women are less likely to receive lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We analysed whether this under-prescription currently persists and has an impact on long-term outcomes. The FAST-MI programme consists of nationwide registries including all patients admitted for AMI ≤ 48 h from onset over a 1 month period in 2005, 2010, and 2015, with long-term follow-up. This analysis focused on high-intensity LLT (atorvastatin ≥ 40 mg or equivalent, or any combination of statin and ezetimibe) in women and men. Women accounted for 28% (N = 3547) of the 12 659 patients. At discharge, high-intensity LLT was significantly less prescribed in women [54 vs. 68% in men, P < 0.001, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.78(95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.87)], a trend that did not improve over time: 2005, 25 vs. 35% (P = 0.14); 2010, 66 vs. 79% (P < 0.001); 2015, 67 vs. 79.5% (P = 0.001). In contrast, female sex was not associated with a lack of other recommended treatments at discharge: beta-blockers [adjusted OR 0.98(95% CI 0.88-1.10), P = 0.78], or renin-angiotensin blockers [adjusted OR 0.94(95% CI 0.85-1.03), P = 0.18]. High-intensity LLT at discharge was significantly associated with improved 5 year survival and infarct- and stroke-free survival in women [adjusted hazard ratios (HR) 0.74(95% CI 0.64-0.86), P < 0.001 and adjusted HR: 0.81(95% CI: 0.74-0.89); P < 0.001, respectively]. Similar results were found using a propensity score-matched analysis [HR for 5 year survival in women with high-intensity LLT: 0.82(95% CI 0.70-0.98), P = 0.03]. Women suffer from a bias regarding the prescription of high-intensity LLT after AMI, which did not attenuate between 2005 and 2015, with potential consequences on both survival and risk of cardiovascular events.

Association between the use of statins and in-hospital mortality risk in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy during ICU stays: a study based on medical information mart for intensive care database

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to explore the correlation between statin administration in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting and the in-hospital mortality risk of patients suffering from sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC).MethodsUtilizing a retrospective cohort study design, this investigation collected data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV spanning 2008 to 2019. The diagnosis of SIC was established based on a SIC score of 4 or above. Statin usage during the ICU period was extracted from the prescription records based on the keywords of statin medications. The primary endpoint analyzed was the in-hospital mortality within the ICU, characterized by any death occurring during the ICU admission.ResultsDuring the follow-up, which had a median duration of approximately 7.28 days, 18.19% of the 4,777 SIC patients died in the ICU. Statin was linked with a decrease in the risk of in-hospital mortality for SIC patients in the ICU [hazard ratio (HR): 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60–0.89, P = 0.002]. Relative to rosuvastatin, the use of atorvastatin (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34–0.85, P = 0.008) or simvastatin (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.33–0.92, P = 0.024), as well as combinations of multiple statins (HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15–0.86, P = 0.022), was associated with a reduction in ICU in-hospital mortality risk. Subgroup analysis also suggested that the use of atorvastatin, simvastatin, or a combination of statins had an advantage over rosuvastatin in reducing ICU in-hospital mortality in SIC patients older than 65 years of age or SIC patients with respiratory failure or cardiogenic shock (all P < 0.05).ConclusionThe present study supports the potential benefits of statin use in mortality in SIC patients during ICU stays. The study encourages clinicians to consider the benefits of statins and supports the ongoing exploration of statins for enhanced outcomes in critical care settings.

Initiation of lipid-lowering therapy as primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the elderly.

This study aimed to analyse the initiation adherence phase to lipid-lowering therapy for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in a Spanish population aged 70 years or older. The secondary objective was to identify the determinants of initiation and early discontinuation. This was an observational study conducted in the CArdiovascular Risk factors for HEalth Service research (CARhES) cohort. People aged 70 and older with a first prescription of a lipid-lowering drug and without a previous major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) were selected (2018-2021). Data on sociodemographics, clinical conditions, drugs and use of health services were collected from clinical and administrative electronic databases. The study population was classified into: non-initiation, early discontinuation (i.e., discontinuation after the first dispensing) and initiation with more than one dispensing. Their characteristics were compared. Determinants of initiation and early discontinuation were explored. Among the 15 019 people studied, 80.2% initiated the medication, 11.2% showed an early discontinuation and 8.6% were non-initiators. An older age or conditions such as dementia, diabetes or depression reduced the likelihood of initiation, while obesity and a high pharmacological burden increased it. People over 90 years of age or those prescribed a statin in combination were more likely to have an early discontinuation. Non-initiation and early discontinuation are common among older people prescribed lipid-lowering drugs as primary prevention of cardiovascular disease for the first time. The presence of chronic pathologies other than cardiovascular ones should be considered when assessing whether or not to prescribe these drugs in the elderly.

Early Management of Blood Lipid Levels with Non-Statin Lipid-Lowering Drugs in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Mini Review.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, despite many improvements in its prevention and management. Lipid management is an important aspect of secondary prevention after ACS. Previous studies indicate that the early use of intensive statin therapy in patients with ACS may alleviate the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality. However, many patients do not reach the target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level of < 55mg/dL with statin monotherapy, and muscle-related adverse effects caused by statins hinder adherence to treatment. Novel non-statin agents are recommended for patients who cannot achieve the target LDL-C levels with high-intensity statin therapy and those with statin intolerance. The combination of statins and non-statins may synergistically affect intensively lowering LDL-C through different mechanisms, which could lead to better cardiovascular outcomes than statin monotherapy. However, it remains uncertain whether the early use of combination lipid-lowering therapy is more beneficial. The present review summarizes the benefits of intensive statin monotherapy and their early combination with non-statin medications including ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors, inclisiran, and bempedoic acid (BDA) in the management of ACS.

Lipid lowering for prevention of venous thromboembolism: a network meta-analysis.

Studies have suggested that statins may be associated with reduced risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of the current study was to assess the evidence regarding the comparative effect of all lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) in primary VTE prevention. After a systematic search of PubMed, CENTRAL, and Web of Science up until 2 November 2022, randomized controlled trials (RCT) of statins (high- or low-/moderate-intensity), ezetimibe, or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) were selected. An additive component network meta-analysis to compare VTE risk during long-term follow-up across different combinations of LLT was performed. Forty-five RCTs (n = 254 933 patients) were identified, reporting a total of 2084 VTE events. Compared with placebo, the combination of PCSK9i with high-intensity statin was associated with the largest reduction in VTE risk (risk ratio [RR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.80), while there was a trend towards reduction for high-intensity (0.84; 0.70-1.02) and low-/moderate-intensity (0.89; 0.79-1.00) statin monotherapy. Ezetimibe monotherapy did not affect the VTE risk (1.04; 0.83-1.30). There was a gradual increase in the summary effect of VTE reduction with increasing intensity of the LLT. When compared with low-/moderate-intensity statin monotherapy, the combination of PCSK9i and high-intensity statin was significantly more likely to reduce VTE risk (0.66; 0.49-0.89). The present meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that LLT may have a potential for VTE prevention, particularly in high-intensity dosing and in combination therapy.

Two-year prognosis and cardiovascular disease prevention after acute coronary syndrome; the role of cardiac rehabilitation: a French nationwide study.

To evaluate the impact of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on optimization of secondary prevention treatments for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), medication persistence, medical follow-up, rehospitalisation, and all-cause mortality. The national health insurance database was used to identify all patients hospitalised for ACS in France in 2019 and those among them who received CR. Patients' characteristics and outcomes were described and compared between CR and non-CR patients. Poisson regression models were used to identify the impact of CR after adjusting for confounders. A Cox model was fitted to identify the variables related to mortality after adjustment for medication persistence and cardiologic follow-up. In 2019, 22% of 134,846 patients hospitalised for ACS in France received CR within six months of their discharge. After one year, only 60% of patients who did not receive CR were still taking BASI drugs (combination of Beta blockers, Antiplatelets agents, Statins and RAAS Inhibitors). This rate and the medical follow-up rate were higher in patients who received CR. Two years after the ACS event, patients who received CR had better medical follow-up and lower mortality risk, after adjusting for cofounding variables (adjusted HR all-cause mortality = 0.65 [0.61-0.69]). After adjustment for the dispensing of cardiovascular drugs and cardiologic follow-up, the independent effect of CR was not as strong but remained significant (HR = 0.90 [95%CI: 0.84-0.95]). Patients who received CR after hospitalisation for ACS had a better prognosis. Optimization of efficient secondary prevention strategies, improved medication persistence, and enhanced cardiologic follow-up seemed to play a major role.

The Polypill: A New Alternative in the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of death and disability worldwide. Although age-standardized CVD mortality rates decreased globally by 14.5% between 2006 and 2016, the burden of CVD remains disproportionately higher in low- and middle-income countries compared to high-income countries. Even though proven, effective approaches based on multiple-drug intake aimed at the prevention and treatment of CVD are currently available, poor adherence, early discontinuation of treatment, and suboptimal daily execution of the prescribed therapeutic regimes give rise to shortfalls in drug exposure, leading to high variability in the responses to the prescribed medications. Wald and Law, in their landmark paper published in BMJ 2003, hypothesized that the use of a fixed-dose combination of statins, β-blockers, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and aspirin (classic Polypill composition) may increase adherence and decrease CVD by up to 80% when prescribed as primary prevention or in substitution of traditional protocols. Since then, many clinical trials have tested this hypothesis, with comparable results. This review aims to describe the available clinical trials performed to assess the impact of fixed-dose combinations on adherence, cost-effectiveness, and the risk factors critical to the onset of CVD.

25years of lipid-lowering therapy: secular trends in therapy of coronary patients.

Guidelines on dyslipidemia and lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) over the years recommend lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals by more intense therapy. Nevertheless, LDL‑C has increased in the general population. Real-world trends of LLT medication as well as of LDL‑C levels in cardiovascular high-risk patients are unclear. From 2158 patients who were referred for elective coronary angiography, lipid medication was analyzed at admission in three cardiovascular observational studies (OS) over the last 25years: OS1: 1999-2000, OS2: 2005-2008 and OS3: 2022-2023. The three studies were performed at the same cardiology unit of atertiary care hospital in Austria. The proportion of patients without LLT significantly decreased from OS1 through OS2 to OS3 (49.4%, 45.6%, and 18.5%, respectively, ptrend < 0.001). Moreover, the percentage of patients under high-intensity statin treatment significantly increased from 0% to 5.1%, and 56.5% (ptrend < 0.001). Significantly more patients became treated by more than one compound (OS1: 1.8%, OS2: 1.6%, OS3: 31.2%; ptrend < 0.001). In the latest OS3, atrend to fixed-dose combination of statins with ezetimibe was observed. Mean LDL‑C levels decreased from 129 mg/dL over 127 mg/dL to 83 mg/dL, respectively (ptrend < 0.001). Of the patients on high-intensity therapy 34% met the recent ESC/EAS goals (LDL-C < 55 mg/dL), but only 3% on non-intense therapy. We conclude that during the observational period of aquarter of acentury, treatment intensity increased and LDL‑C levels improved considerably. Guidelines apparently matter in this high-risk population and are considered by primary care physicians.

Safety of Combined Statin and Fibrate Therapy: Risks of Liver Injury and Acute Kidney Injury in a Cohort Study from the Shizuoka Kokuho Database.

Statins and fibrates are important means of preventing cardiovascular diseases, particularly when administered in combination as part of various therapeutic strategies. In this study, we explored the risks associated with various combinations of these drugs. We aimed to evaluate the risk of 1-year hospitalization with acute kidney injury, liver injury, pancreatitis, or rhabdomyolysis related to the concurrent administration of statins and fibrates. We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Shizuoka Kokuho Database, focusing on patients prescribed statins, fibrates, or a combination. Four drug exposure patterns were evaluated: adding statins to fibrates (exposure 1), switching from fibrates to statins (exposure 2), adding fibrates to statins (exposure 3), and switching from statins to fibrates (exposure 4). Hospitalization for the specified conditions within 1year was the outcome. Propensity score matching was used to create balanced cohorts for comparison. We studied 269,226 statin users and 16,282 fibrate users. After propensity score matching, there were 498 participants in the group of exposure 1, matched with 2988 in the fibrate-only group; 1180 in the group of exposure 2, matched with 7080 in the fibrate-only group; 1183 in group of exposure 3, matched with 11,830 in the statin only group; and 1356 in group of exposure 4, matched with 13,560 in the statin only group. The 1-year hospitalization rate with liver injury was higher in the group of exposure 1 than in the fibrate-only group (1.2% vs 0.3%, p < 0.01), in the group of exposure 2 than in the fibrate-only group (0.9% vs 0.3%, p < 0.01), and in the group of exposure 4 than in the statin-only group (0.6% vs 0.2%, p = 0.02). There was also a higher risk of 1-year hospitalization with acute kidney injury in group of exposure 1 than in the fibrate-only group (1.3% vs 0.3%, p = 0.01) but not in evaluations of exposure 2, 3, and 4. However, there were no differences in the risks of 1-year hospitalization with pancreatitis or rhabdomyolysis among the matched groups. We have demonstrated higher risks of 1-year hospitalization with liver injury or acute kidney injury associated with the use of combinations of statins and fibrates. This underscores the need for a cautious approach to the prescribing of such drug combinations and the importance of monitoring patients for potential adverse events.

Abstract PO4-20-04: A Randomized Window of Opportunity Study of Preoperative Letrozole and Simvastatin Versus Letrozole Alone in Stage I-III Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer

Abstract Hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancers are poor responders to immunotherapy. There is a need for innovative approaches to improve immune responses in these tumors. The combination of statins and aromatase inhibitors have demonstrated antiproliferative and immunomodulatory properties. However, this combination has never been studied in the preoperative setting; thus, our ongoing study represents an opportunity to investigate this approach. We designed a randomized two-arm presurgical “window of opportunity” trial to evaluate the effects of letrozole and simvastatin versus letrozole alone 14 days prior to surgery. Tissue and blood will be obtained at baseline and 14 days after completion of therapy at the time of surgery. Inflammatory markers in the blood and multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tissue will be assessed. To be eligible for the trial, participants must be postmenopausal women with histologically confirmed stage I-III HR+, HER2- invasive breast cancer with baseline ki-67 ≥10% that have not received prior chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and/or immunotherapy within 3 months prior to trial enrollment. They should also not have received any cholesterol lowering medication within 3 months prior to trial enrollment. The primary objective is to determine if the addition of simvastatin to letrozole compared to letrozole alone will result in a decrease in geometric mean % change in ki-67 from pre-surgical baseline to 14 days following preoperative therapy. Ki-67 is a validated surrogate marker for disease-free survival in HR+, HER2- breast cancer. The main secondary objective is to determine if the addition of simvastatin to letrozole compared to letrozole alone will result in increased immune activation from pre- to post-treatment based on the evaluation of the immune subtype composition in tissue via multiplex immunofluorescence. We aim to enroll 16 patients in each arm to achieve 90% power and detect a minimum difference of 7.5% in ki-67 using a two-sided Mann-Whitney U or Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test. After accounting for a possible drop off rate of 20%, the study’s target accrual will be 40 participants. Statistical analyses will be performed using SAS 9.4. the significance level will be set at alpha = 0.1. Descriptive statistics will be applied to tissue and blood biomarkers of interest at 2 designated time points, prior to preoperative therapy and following completion of preoperative therapy. The absolute change or percentage change of those biomarkers will also be calculated and compared between the 2 arms using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. The correlation among biomarkers will be described by Pearson correlation coefficient with 95% confidence interval. The p-value will be adjusted by Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to control the false discovery rate. All adverse events experienced data will be described by summary statistics and will be assessed according to CTCAE version 5.0. Currently, the study has accrued 2 participants. After completing accrual, we will assess whether the tumor-immune milieu has undergone modulation, resulting in a more immunogenic environment. If an immunogenic effect is demonstrated, this will provide rationale for a future multi-center trial assessing the combination of letrozole, simvastatin, and immunotherapy. Citation Format: Ruth Sacks, Elizabeth Haas, Jade Jones, Manali Bhave, Keerthi Gogineni, Jane Meisel, Demetria Smith-Graziani, Suchi Pakkala, Sarah Friend, Cletus Arciero, Lauren Postlewait, Clara Farley, Cathy Graham, Toncred Styblo, Monica Rizzo, Rhonda Pickett, Nicholas Crasta, Lori Brown, Xiaoxian Li, Sunil Badve, Madhav Dhodapkar, Kevin Kalinsky. A Randomized Window of Opportunity Study of Preoperative Letrozole and Simvastatin Versus Letrozole Alone in Stage I-III Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-20-04.