Combination Of Dexmedetomidine Research Articles

Características ecográficas abdominales del Otorongo (<i>Panthera onca</i>) en cautiverio

The abdomen of apparently healthy jaguars (Panthera onca) kept in confinement at the Parque de Las Leyendas Zoo (Lima) and the San Juan Zoocriadero (Pucallpa, Peru) was evaluated by ultrasound. The work included the examination of 13 specimens, young and mature, female and male. The specimens were anesthetized with a combination of Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine, and Atipamezole was used as an antidote. The Esaote MyLabOne™ equipment and the 4-9 MHz microconvex transducer were used. The anatomical location, echotexture and architecture of the abdominal organs were evaluated. From the study it was possible to conclude that the ultrasound characteristics of the abdominal organs of Panthera onca specimens are similar to those described for other species of South American wild felines, varying in length, width or thickness in correspondence to the larger size of the jaguar; and that the characteristics of the abdominal organs do not differ significantly from those described for companion animals.

Combination of different local anesthetic adjunct for supraclavicular brachial plexus block after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BackgroundAcute pain is a major concern after arthroscopic shoulder surgery, supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade has shown favorable postoperative analgesic effects. However, its duration of analgesia does not meet clinical needs. We aimed to explore whether the combination of different local anesthetic adjunct can prolong the analgesic duration of supraclavicular brachial plexus block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.MethodsIn this prospective randomized controlled trial, we allocated 80 patients into four groups: Group DMD (dexamethasone 10 mg + ropivacaine 100 mg + dexmedetomidine 50 µg + magnesium sulfate 250 mg), Group DM (ropivacaine 100 mg + dexmedetomidine 50 µg + magnesium sulfate 250 mg), Group M (ropivacaine 100 mg + magnesium sulfate 250 mg) and Group D (ropivacaine 100 mg + dexmedetomidine 50 µg). The primary outcome was the time to first request for analgesia. Secondary outcome measures included cumulative opioid consumption at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 h postoperatively, VAS scores at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 h postoperatively and so on.ResultsThe time to first request for analgesia in Group DMD was significantly longer than Group DM (P = 0.011) and Group M (P = 0.003). The cumulative opioid consumption at 18 h postoperatively in Group DMD was significantly lower than in Group DM (P = 0.002) and Group M (P = 0.007). The cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h postoperatively in Group DMD was significantly lower than in Group DM (P = 0.016). The VAS score at 6 h postoperatively in Group DMD was significantly lower than in Group DM and Group M. The VAS score at 12 h postoperatively in Group DMD was significantly lower than in Group M. For American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score, Group DMD had a better score than Group DM and Group D.ConclusionsThe analgesic efficacy of supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade combined with dexamethasone, magnesium sulfate, and dexmedetomidine is significantly superior to the combination of magnesium sulfate and dexmedetomidine, and significantly superior to the use of magnesium sulfate alone.Trial registrationThis trial was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. (ChiCTR2200061181, Date of registration: June 15, 2022, http://www.chictr.org.cn)

Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone as Adjuvants to the Local Anesthetic Mixture in Rhomboid Intercostal and Sub-Serratus Block for Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.

The utilization of adjuvants such as dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine in combination with local anesthetics has proven effective in extending analgesia duration. We aimed to investigate the potential efficacy of combining dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone in rhomboid intercostal and sub-serratus (RISS) block for prolonging postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). We did this randomized, double-blind, controlled trial in two tertiary-care hospitals. A total of eighty-eight patients undergoing VATS under general anesthesia were enrolled in this study. They were randomly assigned into four groups: ropivacaine (R) group, ropivacaine + dexmedetomidine (RM) group, ropivacaine + dexamethasone (RS) group, or ropivacaine + dexmedetomidine + dexamethasone (RSM) group. The primary outcome measure was the duration of analgesia. Secondary outcomes included Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores, cumulative oxycodone consumption, and adverse effects. The RSM group exhibited a significantly prolonged duration of analgesia at 1073.5min (932.0-1283.3) compared to the R group with a duration of 154.5min (80.5-199.3) and the RS group with a duration of 282.0min (195.3-350.0, P < 0 0.001). The cumulative oxycodone consumption during the 0-12hours and 0-24-hours period was significantly reduced in the RSM group compared to the R group (P < 0.05). There was also a lower incidence of nausea at 48hours postoperatively in the RSM group compared to the RM group. However, there were no significant differences between the four groups regarding NRS pain scores. The combination of ropivacaine, dexmedetomidine, and dexamethasone in RISS block significantly prolongs the duration of postoperative analgesia following VATS.

Evaluating the Physiologic Effects of Alfaxalone, Dexmedetomidine, and Midazolam Combinations in Common Blue-Tongued Skinks (Tiliqua scincoides).

Common blue-tongued skinks (Tiliqua scincoides) are popular pet reptiles; however, there has been limited research to investigate sedatives for this species. The purpose of this study was to measure the physiologic effects of four combinations of alfaxalone, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam for minor procedures such as intubation and blood collection. Eleven common blue-tongued skinks (Tiliqua scincoides) were used for this prospective, randomized cross-over study. The subcutaneous combinations were used as follows: 20 mg/kg alfaxalone (A); 10 mg/kg alfaxalone and 1 mg/kg midazolam (AM); 0.1 mg/kg dexmedetomidine and 1 mg/kg midazolam (DM); and 5 mg/kg alfaxalone, 0.05 mg/kg dexmedetomidine, and 0.5 mg/kg midazolam (ADM). Heart rate, respiratory rate, palpebral reflex, righting reflex, escape reflex, toe pinch withdrawal reflex, tongue flicking, and the possibility of intubation were recorded at baseline and every 5 min for 60 min. Venous blood gases were measured at baseline, full sedation, and recovery. Heart and respiratory rates decreased significantly in all groups, but the reductions were most prominent in DM and ADM. Analgesic effects, as measured by the toe pinch withdrawal reflex, were only observed in DM and ADM. Intubation was possible in all four protocols; however, it was not possible in two DM skinks. Based on these trials, ADM and AM are recommended for minor procedures in blue-tongue skinks.

Effect of the combination of dexmedetomidine and sufentanil after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder diseases

Effect of the combination of dexmedetomidine and sufentanil after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder diseases

Intranasal esketamine versus esketamine-dexmedetomidine combination for premedication in pediatric patients undergoing strabismus surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Preoperative fear and anxiety are prevalent in children undergoing surgery. The combination of esketamine and dexmedetomidine has been proposed as a promising premedication for enhancing preoperative sedation and analgesia. This study compared the premedication efficacy of intranasal esketamine alone and esketamine-dexmedetomidine combination in pediatric patients undergoing strabismus surgery. One hundred and eighty preschool children aged 2-6 years scheduled for strabismus surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of the three groups: intranasal premedication with esketamine 2 mg/kg (Group K), esketamine 1 mg/kg and dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (Group KD1), or esketamine 0.5 mg/kg and dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg (Group KD2). The primary outcome was the level of sedation following the intervention, as measured by the modified Yale preoperative anxiety scale (mYPAS) and sedation scale (SS). Secondary outcomes included onset time of sedation, the successful rate of peripheral intravenous cannulation, parental separation anxiety scale (PSAS), mask acceptance scale (MAS), wake-up time, duration of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and premedication-related adverse effects. After premedication, the mYPAS score gradually decreased in the three groups, with lower values in Group K than in Group KD1 and Group KD2 patients in 1, 5, and 10 min. SS in Group KD1 and Group KD2 steadily increased until 40 min after premedication, while SS in Group K increased in the first 5 min after premedication and maintained consistent levels during the remaining time. Sedation onset was substantially faster in Group K patients (11.4±7.8 min) than Group KD1 (18.1±7.5 min, P=0.006) and Group KD2 (18.4±6.8 min, P<0.001). PSAS, separation status, the successful rate of peripheral intravenous cannulation, and MAS were comparable among groups. There was no significant difference in terms of emergence time or duration of stay in the PACU among groups. More gastrointestinal events were observed in Group K (P<0.001). Intranasal premedication with 2 mg/kg esketamine produced a more rapid onset of sedation accompanied by more gastrointestinal reactions compared with a combination of esketamine and dexmedetomidine. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04757675.

Addition of Dexmedetomidine to Propofol Anesthesia for Middle-Ear Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study.

Background Middle-ear surgery commonly performed under a microscope requires a bloodless field provided by hypotensive anesthesia. Our objective wasto study the effects of dexmedetomidine on propofol consumption and intraoperative hemodynamic stability. Methods One hundred adults undergoing elective middle-ear surgery were randomized into two groups. The propofol+dexmedetomidine group (Group PD) received a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1μg/kg in 10ml normal saline over 10min followed by infusion of the same at 0.5μg/kg/h. Propofol-only group (Group P) received 10ml normal saline over 10min followed by an infusion of the same. General anesthesia was induced with intravenous morphine, propofol, and vecuronium, and maintained with propofol, oxygen, and N2O. During microscope use, we aimed to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) within 60-69mmHg. Results There was no significant difference in the mean (SD) consumption of propofol [Group P 8.6 (2.1)mg/kg/h vs Group PD 8.1 (1.5)mg/kg/h, P=0.172]. The induction dose of propofol was significantly less in Group PD [1.8 (0.3) vs 2 (0.4)mg/kg, P<0.001]. Except for the baseline value, the heart rate was significantly lower in Group PD, P<0.001. The time duration during which MAP was within 60-69mmHg was higher in Group P [37.5 (36.8) vs 30.9 (38.3)min] though the difference was not statistically significant. The recovery was delayed in Group PD [25.4 (8.6) vs 17.6 (4.9)min, P<0.001]. Group PD had a significantly better operative field, P=0.0003. Conclusion The addition of dexmedetomidine did not reduce propofol consumption but reduced the induction dose of propofol. Propofol and dexmedetomidine combination provided comparable mean arterial pressure and better operative field but caused delayed recovery.

Severe Neuropathic Back Pain as the Initial Presentation in Angiostrongylus cantonensis Infection: The Role of ICU Management in Overcoming Diagnostic and Analgosedation Challenges

Introduction: Angiostrongylus cantonensis is a parasitic nematode that typically inhabits the pulmonary arteries of rats but can also reside in the central nervous systems of rats and mollusks. Humans can become infected with A. cantonensis by eating infected hosts or consuming contaminated food, especially if it is raw or undercooked. This infection can lead to various neurological symptoms, including neuropathic pain, which is often an early indication of the condition. In this report, we present a case in which the patient experienced neuropathic pain as the initial clinical manifestation of A. cantonensis infection. Case Presentation: We present a rare case of a 27-year-old female who required intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring due to heavy sedation after receiving high doses of sedative-analgesics for back pain. The patient reported experiencing severe, slow-progressing low back pain radiating to her arms and legs. The pain was described as sharp, tingling, and numbing, severely limiting her movements. To manage the pain, a combination of morphine, intermittent fentanyl, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, duloxetine, and pregabalin was administered. Consequently, the patient had to be intubated due to the effects of the analgesics. During the first two weeks in the ICU, diagnosis proved challenging as the MRI was normal and the initial lumbar puncture revealed only an eosinophilic infection. However, during a follow-up lumbar puncture, multiple parasites were discovered in the cerebrospinal fluid, which were identified as A. cantonensis. The patient remains on a ventilator as the infection has affected the spinal nerve roots, cord, meninges, and brain. We explore the crucial role of ICU care in providing both supportive and definitive treatment for this patient. Conclusions: This report underscores the critical role of the ICU in providing care for a patient with a progressively deteriorating condition without an initial definitive diagnosis. The ICU's ability to deliver optimal pain relief and sedation, advanced monitoring, and prompt therapy for deteriorating symptoms was of utmost significance. Furthermore, the multidisciplinary team in the ICU was instrumental in managing the continuum of care for the patient.

Dexmedetomidine administration in a laryngeal cancer patient with emergency tracheostomy: a case report

The maintenance of vital functions in any patient depends upon the preservation and maintenance of airway patency. Conditions that may cause difficult airway, such as a laryngeal mass, require rapid and expert intervention. We briefly review the current knowledge on this subject by presenting the report of a patient who required emergency airway intervention and in whom a tracheostomy had to be resorted to under sedation. A 59-year-old male patient who was scheduled for total laryngectomy and neck dissection due to laryngeal cancer was taken to the operating room with the decision of emergency tracheostomy after developing respiratory distress. Nasoendoscopic visualization of the patient showed an exophytic lesion starting from the root of the tongue on the left and extending to the chordae. Inj fentanyl and dexmedetomidine were administered to the patient for sedation and dexmedetomidine infusion was continued after the loading dose. When the thyroid isthmus was encountered during the surgical intervention, a tracheostomy was made at 45 min. A 7.5 mm cuffed tube was inserted and respiratory control was achieved. This case report stresses that a combination of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl can be used safely in such cases. Keywords: tracheostomy, dexmedetomidine, diffuculut airway Citation: Kaya F, Evirgen ES, Aydin EU, Kocagil S, Erkiliç E. Dexmedetomidine administration in a laryngeal cancer patient with emergency tracheostomy: a case report. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(4):772−775; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i4.2522 Received: April 17, 2024; Reviewed: June 05, 2024; Accepted: June 05, 2024

Ketamine combined with dexmedetomidine reduces neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in critically ill COVID-19 patients; a pre-experimental study

Background &amp; objective: About 20% of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) need ventilatory support under sedation using dexmedetomidine and ketamine. Ketamine has an anti-inflammatory effect and is expected to suppress immune cells. A high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with a severe stage of the disease. We compared NLR between COVID-19 patients under sedation with dexmedetomidine alone or with dexmedetomidine combined with ketamine. Methodology: This pre-experimental study involved a control group of patients receiving dexmedetomidine (n = 10) and the intervention group receiving dexmedetomidine and ketamine (n = 10) for sedation. NLR was evaluated before and after 24 h of sedation with the study drugs. Result: The patients' NLR increased significantly at 24 h after sedation using sole dexmedetomidine from 9.01 to 15.62 (P &gt; 0.05). The combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine significantly reduced NLR from 11.22 to 8.61 (P = 0.026). Both groups experienced a decrease in neutrophil count (P &gt; 0.05). The lymphocyte count increased significantly in the intervention group (P = 0.025) and decreased in the control group. Conclusion: There is a significant NLR difference between a patient receiving dexmedetomidine sedation compared dexmedetomidine combined with ketamine. A combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine reduces NLR compared to sole dexmedetomidine in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Keywords: COVID-19, dexmedetomidine, ICU, ketamine, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, NLR Citation: Fatoni AZ, Asmoro AA, Saputra BM, Siswagama TA. Dexmedetomidine combined with ketamine reduces neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in critically ill COVID-19 patients; a pre-experimental study. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(4):737−743; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i4.2365 Received: December 19, 2023; Reviewed: February 07, 2024; Accepted: June 26, 2024

Effect of propofol infusion vs ketamine plus dexmedetomidine infusion on the amplitude of motor evoked potential in pediatric patients undergoing tethered spinal cord surgeries; a randomized, double blind controlled study

Background &amp; objective: The use of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IOM) has increased over the past two decades for the detection and prevention of iatrogenic neurologic injuries. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) are extremely sensitive to changes in physiological variables and inhalational agents reduce MEPs in a dose dependent manner. So IV anesthetics (propofol or ketamine) and opioids (fentanyl or remifentanil), are frequently used in spinal surgeries under MEPs monitoring. We compared the effects of propofol and fentanyl to those of ketamine, dexmedetomidine, and fentanyl in terms of minimizing their effects on MEP amplitude and hemodynamic stability during surgery Methodology: This double blind, randomized, prospective study was conducted on 46 children, who were randomly allocated into 2 groups Ketamine–dexmedetomidine group: (n = 23) Maintenance throughout the procedure, by infusing Dexmedetomidine (0.4 -0.6 μg/.kg /.hr) ketamine, (1 -2m/.kg/.hr.) and giving bolus of fentanyl, (1-2μg/.kg/ ). Propofol-group:(n = 23) Maintenance throughout the procedure, By infusing propofol (100 ug L/kg/min) and giving bolus of fentanyl, (1-2μg/.kg/ ), with keeping mean arterial blood pressure changes within 25% of the baseline in both groups. Results: Right and left quadriceps muscle measurements were insignificantly different between both groups at base line and were significantly higher in Group KD than Group P at skin incision, surgical manipulation and surgical closure. Right and left adductor hallucis muscle measurements were insignificantly different between both groups at base line and were significantly higher in Group KD than Group P at 5 mins, 10 mins, 15 mins, skin incision, surgical manipulation and surgical closure (P value &lt;0.001). Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in Group KD than Group P. Conclusion: The combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine infusion is efficacious, safe, and has minimal effect on evoked potentials compared with the propofol-based TIVA group during spine pediatrics surgery. In addition, this combination increases the reliability and accuracy of MEP monitoring with hemodynamic stability and adequate post-operative pain relief. Using dexmedetomidine and ketamine infusions during pediatric spine surgery might successfully replace the typical propofol-based TIVA, although more studies are required . Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT05591001. Keywords: Motor evoked potential, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, propofol. Citation: Saleh AH, Hammad SH, Hassan PF. Effect of propofol infusion vs ketamine plus dexmedetomidine infusion on the amplitude of motor evoked potential in pediatric patients undergoing tethered spinal cord surgeries; a randomized, double blind controlled study. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(4):692−699; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i4.2218 Received: May 08, 2023; Reviewed: February 02, 2024; Accepted: July 03, 2924

Effect of modified opioid sparing anaesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery: protocol for a monocentre, double-blind randomised controlled trial – the MOSA study

IntroductionObesity patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS) are frequently encountered perioperative adverse events related to opioids-based anaesthesia (OBA) or opioids-free anaesthesia (OFA). While modified opioid-sparing anaesthesia (MOSA) has been shown...

Critical Management of Recurrent Seizure at 16-Year-Old Primigravida with Atypical Eclampsia: A Case Report

Background: Atypical eclampsia, characterized by seizures without the classic signs of hypertension and proteinuria, presents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in the critical management aspect. This case report highlights the critical management of recurrent seizures in a young primigravida with atypical eclampsia. Case presentation: A 16-year-old primigravida at 38 weeks gestation presented with recurrent generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Despite initial magnesium sulfate therapy, seizures persisted postpartum. The patient was managed with a combination of midazolam and dexmedetomidine for seizure control and sedation. After five days of intensive care, the patient recovered without further complications. Conclusion: This case underscores the importance of considering atypical eclampsia in pregnant women presenting with seizures, even in the absence of typical preeclampsia symptoms. The successful use of midazolam and dexmedetomidine in this case suggests their potential as alternative therapeutic agents for refractory seizures in eclampsia. Further research is needed to validate these findings and establish optimal treatment protocols for atypical eclampsia.

Effectiveness of buccal administration of dexmedetomidine and ketamine combination in paediatric dental sedation: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Pain and anxiety can be considerable obstacles while treating paediatric dental patients. Moderate sedation is needed to treat uncooperative patients. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of buccal administration of dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination versus dexmedetomidine. Fifty-six uncooperative children were randomly assigned into two groups: Group I received buccal dexmedetomidine (2 μg/kg) and ketamine (2 mg/kg) (DEX-KET), whereas Group II received buccal dexmedetomidine (4 μg/kg) (DEX). The effects of drugs were evaluated based on changes in vital signs, onset and duration of sedation, sedation level, analgesia, ease of treatment and procedural adverse effects. There were no significant differences in vital signs or sedation onset between the two groups. DEX-KET group showed shorter recovery time than DEX group (p < .0001). There were no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding sedation level at optimum sedation and during operative procedure (p = .064, p = .069 respectively). The ease of treatment was significantly better in DEX-KET group than in DEX group (p = .048). Procedural side effects and analgesic effects of the sedative drugs were comparable between both groups. The combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine delivered buccally provided a better method of delivering care to uncooperative children with more rapid recovery than dexmedetomidine.

Brachial plexus block associated with balanced anesthesia in caracara plancus for fracture treatment

This study demonstrates the efficacy of brachial plexus block combined with balanced anesthesia in the treatment of fractures in Caracara plancus, an area rarely explored in veterinary medicine. An adult male caracara with a left humeral fracture was successfully treated using a multimodal anesthetic approach. The combination of dexmedetomidine, ketamine, midazolam, and morphine provided effective anesthesia, resulting in muscle relaxation and hemodynamic stability. The brachial plexus block, performed with the aid of a nerve stimulator, was essential for segmental analgesia. The anesthetic protocol employed allowed for the entire surgical procedure to be conducted pain-free and safely. Postoperative recovery was rapid and uncomplicated, with bone consolidation confirmed by radiographs. It is concluded that the brachial plexus block combined with balanced anesthesia is a viable and safe option for orthopedic procedures in birds of prey

Propofol/Dexmedetomidine versus Desflaurane Effects on Post Hepatectomy Hepatocellular Injury

Abstract Objective The Pringle maneuver used during hepatectomy causes ischemic reperfusion injury to the liver remnant. In this study, we compared the effect of maintenance of general anesthesia with propofol dexmedetomidine intravenous infusion versus desflurane inhalational anesthesia on post hepatectomy hepatocellular injury in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy during the first six postoperative days. Method Group A (15 patients) received total intravenous anesthesia with a combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine for anesthesia maintenance. and Group B (15 patients) received desflurane for anesthesia maintenance. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), serum albumin, serum bilirubin, prothrombin time and international normalized ratio (INR) were measured before surgery and at 1, 3, and 6 days after surgery. Results Transaminase levels, which were comparable in both groups, peaked between the first and the third postoperative days. Peak alanine aminotransferase was 224.27±29.7 and 318.20±52.5 U/L in the group A and group B, respectively (P &amp;lt; 0.001). Peak aspartate aminotransferase was 265.60±22.3 U/L in group A and 349.27±56.1 U/L in group B (P &amp;lt; 0.001). Albumin levels at day one showed no significant differences between both groups but at days 3 and 6, group A showed significantly higher albumin levels than group B. Other liver function tests including serum albumin, total and direct bilirubin, PT and INR showed lower values in propofol/dexmedetomidine group. Conclusion The main finding of this study is that propofol/dexmedetomidine as a technique for maintenance of anesthesia resulted in less hepatocellular injury and better hepatic functions than desflurane in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy during the first 6 postoperative days.

Effect of esketamine combined with dexmedetomidine on delirium in sedation for mechanically ventilated ICU patients: protocol for a nested substudy within a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundUse of sedatives and analgesics is associated with the occurrence of delirium in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Dexmedetomidine reduces the occurrence of delirium but may cause hypotension, bradycardia, and insufficient sedation. This substudy aims to determine whether the combination of esketamine with dexmedetomidine can reduce the side effects and risk of delirium than dexmedetomidine alone in mechanically ventilated patients.MethodsThis single-center, randomized, active-controlled, superiority trial will be conducted at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. A total of 134 mechanically ventilated patients will be recruited and randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine alone or esketamine combined with dexmedetomidine, until extubation or for a maximum of 14 days. The primary outcome is the occurrence of delirium, while the second outcomes include the number of delirium-free days; subtype, severity, and duration of delirium; time to first onset of delirium; total dose of vasopressors and antipsychotics; duration of mechanical ventilation; ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS); accidental extubation, re-intubation, re-admission; and mortality in the ICU at 14 and 28 days.DiscussionThere is an urgent need for a new combination regimen of dexmedetomidine due to its evident side effects. The combination of esketamine and dexmedetomidine has been applied throughout the perioperative period. However, there is still a lack of evidence on the effects of this regimen on delirium in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. This substudy will evaluate the effects of the combination of esketamine and dexmedetomidine in reducing the risk of delirium for mechanically ventilated patients in ICU, thus providing evidence of this combination to improve the short-term prognosis. The study protocol has obtained approval from the Medical Ethics Committee (ID: 2022-SR-450).Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05466708, registered on 20 July 2022.

Combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants of transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in gastric cancer patients: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveWe conducted this double-blinded randomized controlled trial to examine whether the combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block could improve analgesia efficacy and duration for gastric cancer patients. DesignRandomized controlled trial. SettingThe preoperative area, operating room, postanesthesia recovery room and bed ward. PatientsA total of 312 adult patients (104 per group) with gastric cancer were included. InterventionsPatients received bilateral subcostal TAP block with three different anesthetics (60 ml 0.25% ropivacaine added with 10 mg dexamethasone and 1 μg·kg-1 dexmedetomidine [A] or 10 mg dexamethasone [B] or 1 μg·kg-1 dexmedetomidine [C]). MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain 24 h on movement. Secondary outcomes included incidence of moderate-to-severe pain, pain score, opioids use, recovery quality and adverse events. Main resultsThe incidence of moderate-to-severe pain on movement 24 h postoperatively of group A was significantly lower than group B (45.19% vs 63.46%; RR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.92) and group C (45.19% vs 73.08%, RR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.79). The median moving pain scores decreased significantly at 24 h (3.00 [3.00,5.00] vs 4.00 [3.00,6.00] vs 4.00 [3.00,5.00]; P < 0.001). There were significant differences in the opioids consumption within the first 24 h (27.5 [17.0,37.2] vs 30.0 [20.0,42.0] vs 32.0 [25.0,44.0] mg; P = 0.01) and the duration to first rescue analgesia (65.5 ± 26.7 vs 45.9 ± 34.5 vs 49.2 ± 27.2 h; P = 0.04). ConclusionsThe combination with dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants for TAP block reduced the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain and pain score both on movement and at rest at 24 h with prolonged duration to first rescue analgesia after gastric cancer surgery.Trial registration number: ChiCTR2000037981.

Comparison of intranasal ketamine with intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine combination in pediatric dental patients for procedural sedation: A crossover study.

The main goal of the pediatric dentist is to address and reduce children's fear and anxiety during the dental treatment, especially when conventional behavior-guiding strategies fail. In such cases, the use of pharmacological agents becomes an essential factor to consider. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of intranasal ketamine (INK) with the combination of intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine (INMzD) in pediatric dental patients for the procedural sedation. Forty-seven children aged 3-9 years who required dental procedures such as extractions, pulpectomy, and restorations were randomly distributed into two groups using the envelope drawing method. Group INK received 7 mg/kg INK, whereas Group INMzD received a combination of midazolam spray (0.3 mg/kg) and atomized dexmedetomidine (3 μg/kg). INK showed faster onset, faster recovery, and shorter discharge time than INMzD. Both groups had acceptable physiological parameters and no postoperative complications. INK was more accepted by the patients than INMzD. In terms of efficacy, safety, and acceptability, INK outperformed the combination of INMzD for the procedural sedation.

Comparison of Anesthetics for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion: A Network Meta-Analysis.

This study aimed to establish which anesthetic agents are associated with minimized adverse outcomes during laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with American Society of Anesthesiologists I or II adult patients (≥15 years of age) receiving general anesthesia (GA) with an LMA. Propofol only was the comparator to other anesthetics used during LMA insertion. The primary outcome was prolonged apnea, and secondary outcomes were adverse airway events, LMA insertion failure, inadequate depth of anesthesia, and hemodynamic events. A network meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the treatment effects (odds ratios, 95% credible intervals, and surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA]). A total of 28 anesthetic combinations used on 4695 patients for GA induction and LMA insertion were examined across 53 RCTs. Overall, there was an apnea incidence rate of 33.3% (849 of 2548) with a mean time of 3.74 ± 3.56 minutes (n = 3091). Propofol + dexmedetomidine had the highest overall summed score of SUCRA ranks in reducing adverse outcomes (apnea incidence: SUCRA = 37%, apnea time: SUCRA = 66%, airway adverse event: SUCRA = 67%, insertion failure: SUCRA = 73%, inadequate depth of anesthesia: SUCRA = 84%). In comparison among all propofol combinations, propofol alone ranked lowest for overall summed score of SUCRA in reducing adverse outcomes (apnea incidence: SUCRA = 47%, apnea time: SUCRA = 71%, airway adverse event: SUCRA = 9%, insertion failure: SUCRA = 20%, inadequate depth of anesthesia: SUCRA = 9%). All anesthetic combinations, other than those with thiopental, reduced adverse outcomes as compared with propofol alone. The combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine infused over 10 minutes ranked as the most effective for reducing adverse outcomes during LMA insertion.