Combination Of Clofazimine Research Articles

Is Itraconazole Plus Clofazimine an Effective Treatment for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis?

Background: Leishmaniasis is endemic in 88 countries and has a worldwide prevalence of 12 million. Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) cases deserve the highest attention due to their magnitude and risk of causing scars in humans. Although several studies have been performed on novel therapies, treatment failure and drug resistance are still common, and most systemic treatments are parenteral. Thus, in this study, it was attempted to find an effective combination oral therapy for this disease. Case Series: Six patients (between 35 and 64 years old) with confirmed CL were treated with a combination of clofazimine (CLZ, 200 mg/d) and itraconazole (ITN, 300 mg/d) for 4 weeks. Then, ITZ 300 mg/d was given for another 4 weeks. All patients were followed up to assess the efficacy and side effects of this treatment regimen. Every single lesion in the patients was remarkably smaller after the course of the treatment (P=0.001), and skin smears became negative. Conclusion: The combination of CLZ and ITN could be a helpful treatment modality in the treatment of CL. However, more and larger studies should be conducted to assess the efficacy and side effects of this combination therapy.

Minimal effective dose of bedaquiline administered orally and activity of a long acting formulation of bedaquiline in the murine model of leprosy.

Bedaquiline (BDQ), by targeting the electron transport chain and having a long half-life, is a good candidate to simplify leprosy treatment. Our objectives were to (i) determine the minimal effective dose (MED) of BDQ administered orally, (ii) evaluate the benefit of combining two inhibitors of the respiratory chain, BDQ administered orally and clofazimine (CFZ)) and (iii) evaluate the benefit of an intramuscular injectable long-acting formulation of BDQ (intramuscular BDQ, BDQ-LA IM), in a murine model of leprosy. To determine the MED of BDQ administered orally and the benefit of adding CFZ, 100 four-week-old female nude mice were inoculated in the footpads with 5x103 bacilli of M. leprae strain THAI53. Mice were randomly allocated into: 1 untreated group, 5 groups treated with BDQ administered orally (0.10 to 25 mg/kg), 3 groups treated with CFZ 20 mg/kg alone or combined with BDQ administered orally 0.10 or 0.33 mg/kg, and 1 group treated with rifampicin (RIF) 10 mg/kg. Mice were treated 5 days a week during 24 weeks. To evaluate the benefit of the BDQ-LA IM, 340 four-week-old female swiss mice were inoculated in the footpads with 5x103 to 5x101 bacilli (or 5x100 for the untreated control group) of M. leprae strain THAI53. Mice were randomly allocated into the following 11 groups treated with a single dose (SD) or 3 doses (3D) 24h after the inoculation: 1 untreated group, 2 treated with RIF 10 mg/kg SD or 3D, 8 treated with BDQ administered orally or BDQ-LA IM 2 or 20 mg/kg, SD or 3D. Twelve months later, mice were sacrificed and M. leprae bacilli enumerated in the footpad. All the footpads became negative with BDQ at 3.3 mg/kg. The MED of BDQ administered orally against M. leprae in this model is therefore 3.3 mg/kg. The combination of CFZ and BDQ 10-fold lower than this MED did not significantly increase the bactericidal activity of CFZ. The BDQ-LA IM displayed similar or lower bactericidal activity than the BDQ administered orally. We demonstrated that the MED of BDQ administered orally against M. leprae was 3.3 mg/kg in mice and BDQ did not add significantly to the efficacy of CFZ at the doses tested. BDQ-LA IM was similar or less active than BDQ administered orally at equivalent dosing and frequency but should be tested at higher dosing in order to reach equivalent exposure in further experiments.

Combination of Clofazimine and Atovaquone as a Potent Therapeutic Regimen for the Radical Cure of Babesia microti Infection in Immunocompromised Hosts.

Human babesiosis caused by Babesia microti can be fatal in immunocompromised patients, and the currently used drugs are often ineffective. A recent study found that clofazimine clears B. microti Munich strain in immunocompromised mice. In the present study, we investigated the efficacies of clofazimine and 2-drug combinations involving clofazimine, atovaquone, and azithromycin against B. microti Peabody mjr strain in immunocompromised mice. Treatment with clofazimine alone, clofazimine plus azithromycin, and atovaquone plus azithromycin was ineffective and failed to eliminate the parasites completely, while a 44-day treatment with clofazimine plus atovaquone was highly effective and resulted in a radical cure.

Synergistic activities of clofazimine with moxifloxacin or capreomycin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in China

Clofazimine (CFZ) is a promising candidate drug for use in the management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients. In this study, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method and checkerboard method were used to investigate potential synergies between CFZ and moxifloxacin (MOX) or capreomycin (CAP). Thirty Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains were collected, including 13 MDR strains, 2 extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains, 3 pan-sensitive strains and 12 strains resistant to other drugs. When the minimum fractional inhibitory concentration indexes (FICIs) were calculated, synergy was found in 21 (70.00%) M. tuberculosis strains against the CFZ/CAP combination and 29 (96.67%) against the CFZ/MOX combination. When the maximum FICIs were calculated, 10 of 15 MDR/XDR strains and 2 of 15 other drug-resistant or pan-sensitive strains showed antagonism against the CFZ/CAP combination, whilst 8 of 15 MDR/XDR strains and 1 of 15 other drug-resistant or pan-sensitive strains showed antagonism against the CFZ/MOX combination, respectively. In conclusion, these findings demonstrate that the combination of CFZ and MOX shows better synergism than the combination of CFZ and CAP. The MDR/XDR isolates are more likely to show antagonism than the other drug-resistant or pan-sensitive strains in both the CFZ/MOX and CFZ/CAP combinations. CFZ in combination with MOX may be a promising drug regimen for the treatment of MDR-TB, particularly for susceptible M. tuberculosis infections.

Clofazimine Prevents the Regrowth of Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium avium Type Strains Exposed to Amikacin and Clarithromycin.

Multidrug therapy is a standard practice when treating infections by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), but few treatment options exist. We conducted this study to define the drug-drug interaction between clofazimine and both amikacin and clarithromycin and its contribution to NTM treatment. Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium avium type strains were used. Time-kill assays for clofazimine alone and combined with amikacin or clarithromycin were performed at concentrations of 0.25× to 2× MIC. Pharmacodynamic interactions were assessed by response surface model of Bliss independence (RSBI) and isobolographic analysis of Loewe additivity (ISLA), calculating the percentage of statistically significant Bliss interactions and interaction indices (I), respectively. Monte Carlo simulations with predicted human lung concentrations were used to calculate target attainment rates for combination and monotherapy regimens. Clofazimine alone was bacteriostatic for both NTM. Clofazimine-amikacin was synergistic against M. abscessus (I = 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29 to 0.55) and M. avium (I = 0.027; 95% CI, 0.007 to 0.048). Based on RSBI analysis, synergistic interactions of 28.4 to 29.0% and 23.2 to 56.7% were observed at 1× to 2× MIC and 0.25× to 2× MIC for M. abscessus and M. avium, respectively. Clofazimine-clarithromycin was also synergistic against M. abscessus (I = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.72) and M. avium (I = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.35), RSBI analysis showed 23.5% and 23.3 to 53.3% at 2× MIC and 0.25× to 0.5× MIC for M. abscessus and M. avium, respectively. Clofazimine prevented the regrowth observed with amikacin or clarithromycin alone. Target attainment rates of combination regimens were >60% higher than those of monotherapy regimens for M. abscessus and M. avium. The combination of clofazimine with amikacin or clarithromycin was synergistic in vitro. This suggests a potential role for clofazimine in treatment regimens that warrants further evaluation.

Susceptibility of Mycobacterium abscessus to antimycobacterial drugs in preclinical models.

Over the last 10 years, Mycobacterium abscessus group strains have emerged as important human pathogens, which are associated with significantly higher fatality rates than any other rapidly growing mycobacteria. These opportunistic pathogens are widespread in the environment and can cause a wide range of clinical diseases, including skin, soft tissue, central nervous system, and disseminated infections; by far, the most difficult to treat is the pulmonary form. Infections with M. abscessus are often multidrug-resistant (MDR) and require prolonged treatment with various regimens and, many times, result in high mortality despite maximal therapy. We report here the evaluation of diverse mouse infection models for their ability to produce a progressive high level of infection with M. abscessus. The nude (nu/nu), SCID (severe combined immunodeficiency), gamma interferon knockout (GKO), and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GMCSF) knockout mice fulfilled the criteria for an optimal model for compound screening. Thus, we set out to assess the antimycobacterial activity of clarithromycin, clofazimine, bedaquiline, and clofazimine-bedaquiline combinations against M. abscessus-infected GKO and SCID murine infection models. Treatment of GKO and SCID mice with a combination of clofazimine and bedaquiline was the most effective in decreasing the M. abscessus organ burden.

In vitro synergistic activity of clofazimine and other antituberculous drugs against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates

Clofazimine (CLO) is a promising candidate drug for use in the management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients. In this study, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method was used to investigate drug susceptibility to CLO as well as potential synergies between CLO and other antituberculous drugs, including ethambutol (EMB), levofloxacin (LEV), moxifloxacin (MOX), amikacin (AMK) and capreomycin (CAP), among MDR-TB isolates from China. A total of 195 MDR-TB isolates were collected from the national drug resistance survey conducted in China. Of the 195 MDR-TB isolates, 54 (27.7%) were classified as CLO-resistant, whilst 141 (72.3%) were CLO-susceptible with MICs of ≤1μg/mL. In addition, the prevalence of CLO-resistant isolates among the extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-TB group was 61.5% (8/13), which was significantly higher than that of the MDR-TB group (23.0%) (P=0.006). When fractional inhibitory concentration indexes (FICIs) were calculated for 24 isolates, synergy was found in 11 isolates (45.8%) against the CLO/EMB combination, 6 (25.0%) against the CLO/LEV combination, 8 (33.3%) against the CLO/MOX combination, 4 (16.7%) against the CLO/AMK combination and 5 (20.8%) against the CLO/CAP combination. In addition, <15% of MDR-TB isolates showed antagonistic effects against these five combinations. In conclusion, these findings demonstrate that the combination of CLO and EMB shows better synergism than the other combinations containing CLO. The CLO/MOX combination is more likely to show synergy against MDR-TB isolates than the CLO/LEV combination. Taken together, we suggest that CLO, in combination with EMB or MOX, may be a promising drug regimen for the treatment of MDR-TB.