Columnar Metaplasia Research Articles

Abstract 555: Role of TRIM31 in the pathogenesis of esophageal adenocarcinoma

Abstract Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is one the deadliest cancers in United States (US) and the only major cancer in the US with increasing incidence. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can cause Barrett’s esophagus (BE), a columnar metaplasia of the esophagus strongly associated with the development of EAC. GERD leading to BE is a common pre-occurrence in EAC patients, but the mechanism remains obscure. To explore the mechanism and its components, we compared gene expression in BE and EAC cells with normal esophageal cells and found high expression of tripartite motif-containing protein 31 (TRIM31) in BE and EAC compared to normal esophagus (NE) by transcriptomic profiling of RNA extracted from human esophageal tissues. E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM 31 is a new member of TRIM family and it has been reported to have oncogenic potentials in some cancers. However, its role in EAC pathogenesis is yet to be understood. Methods: RNA sequencing and transcriptomic profiling were performed on human NE, BE, and EAC epithelial tissue samples. TRIM31 expression in NE cell line (Het-1A) and EAC cell lines (OE19, Flo-1, OE33, SK-GT-2, and OACM5.1C) were identified by Western blot analysis. The Het-1A cell line, after exposure to acidic pH and bile acids, was assessed for variable TRIM31 expression. Cell morphology and viability analyses of NE and EAC cell lines after exposure to acidic pH and bile acids either alone or in combinations were observed by microscopy and WST-1 assay respectively. Results: Transcriptomic analysis showed that BE and EAC are similar in their differential gene expression with upregulation of the TRIM31 compared to that in NE. Concordant with their columnar phenotype, BE and EAC groups displayed a multitude of differentially expressed genes relative to NE samples; however, less differentially expressed genes were found comparing BE and EAC groups. Western blot demonstrated frequent overexpression of TRIM31 in EAC cell lines with very low expression of TRIM31 in NE epithelial cell line. When NE epithelial cell line Het-1A was exposed to acidic pH as well as bile acids in acidic pH, we saw a change in cell morphology that may correlate with the metaplasia of these cells to more resilient forms, as seen in human BE and EAC. Interestingly, bile acids in acidic pH increased TRIM31 expression in NE cell line Het-1A. Bile acids had a greater effect on decreasing cell viability at high concentrations and that effect is enhanced when bile acids were added in acidic pH. WST-1 cell viability assay revealed that EAC cells were more resistant to bile acids as well as bile acids in acidic pH induced decreased in cell viability compared to that in NE cell line Het-1A. The sustained cell viability of EAC cell lines under these harsh conditions correlates with the upregulation of TRIM31. Conclusions: Thus, TRIM31 may be an important oncogenic factor in GERD-induced EAC development and may be an innovative therapeutic target and marker for EAC. Citation Format: Md Sazzad Hassan, Jesse Mast, Annie Ritter, Saisantosh Ponna, Niranjan Awasthi, Urs von Holzen. Role of TRIM31 in the pathogenesis of esophageal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 555.

Diagnosis of Columnar Metaplasia of the Esophageal Mucosa in Patients with Complicated Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Aim: to improve methods of diagnostics of esophageal mucosal forms of metaplasia and dysplasia in patients with complicated forms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) using multidisciplinary approach.Material and methods. Overall, 131 patients aged 18 to 84 years (mean age — 55.8 ± 16.7 years) with confirmed diagnosis of GERD complicated by development of metaplasia of mucosa of distal esophagus were included in retroand prospective study. At the prehospital stage the patients' complaints were estimated, anamnesis was taken. At the first stage of the diagnostic program all patients underwent detailed esophagogastroduodenoscopy in high resolution with white light. The region of esophageal mucosa with signs of metaplasia and determination of its prevalence was examined and evaluated with special attention. Ultrashort segment was revealed in 26 patients, short segment — in 47 patients, long segment of mucosal metaplasia was revealed in 58 patients. Then to reveal the signs of dysplasia we used specifying endoscopic methods: the structure of pitted and microvascular pattern was estimated in narrow spectral mode using BING classification system. If an irregular type of metaplasized epithelium structure was detected in the process of BING assessment, the areas suspicious for dysplasia were marked, followed by aim forceps biopsy from them. The next stage was staining of the metaplasized segment with 1.5 % ethanic acid solution — acetowhitening. PREDICT classification system was used to evaluate the stained mucosal sections with metaplasia. Targeted forceps biopsy was performed from the altered areas that most quickly lost their coloring. The final stage of the diagnostic program in all patients was a forceps biopsy of the mucosa of the metaplasic segment according to the Seattle protocol, which requires increasing the number of fragments as the metaplasic segment lengthens in a “blind” biopsy. The biopsy material was stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and periodic acid Schiff reaction was performed in combination with alcyanine blue according to the standard technique.Results. Endoscopic examination in white light and evaluation of metaplasia extent revealed ultrashort segment (<1 cm) in 26/131 (19.9 %) patients; short segment (1–3 cm) — in 47/131 (35.9 %); long segment (> 3 cm) — in 58/131 (44.3 %) patients. Among the diagnostic techniques used, the BING and PREDICT classifications had the highest accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity (accuracy — 88.9 and 95.3 %, sensitivity — 90.5 and 91.3 %, and specificity — 86.7 and 100 %, respectively), which significantly exceeded the Seattle protocol also used in this work. The results showed a low level of specificity (31.2 %), accuracy (54.5 %), and sensitivity (76.8 %) of the Seattle protocol. The use of BING and PREDICT classifications provided marking of compromised zones, allowing targeted histological sampling.Conclusions. The original study demonstrated the greatest sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PREDICT and BING methods in the diagnosis of metaplasia with signs of dysplasia in patients with complicated GERD. It is also important that the use of BING and PREDICT classification systems allows to reduce the number of biopsy samples in comparison with their unreasonably large number according to the Seattle protocol, thereby reducing mucosal and submucosal trauma of the esophagus and the risk of complications.

Bridging Integrator 3 (BIN3) Downregulation Predicts a Poor Prognosis in Patients with Esophagus Carcinoma: A Study based on TCGA Data.

Bridging integrator 3 (BIN3) has been reported to play a key role in certain tumors. Nevertheless, little is known about the role and clinical value of BIN3 in esophagus carcinoma (ESCA). This study aimed to investigate the pathological and prognostic role of BIN3 in ESCA patients. Genes significantly correlated with the prognosis of ESCA patients were screened and identified by comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed genes associated with overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free interval (PFI) in ESCA. The expression of BIN3, pathological features correlation and subgroup overall survival analysis were performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and GTEx databases. Moreover, the potential signaling pathways in which BIN3 was involved were analyzed by GO-KEGG enrichment analysis and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Immune infiltrates correlation of BIN3 in ESCA was performed by TIMER and ssGSEA. The influence of BIN3 on epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was validated by western blot. There were two differentially expressed genes related to the prognosis of ESCA patients, which were identified from three gene clusters associated with overall survival (OS), diseasespecific survival (DSS) and progression-free interval (PFI) in ESCA patients. The BIN3 mRNA level was found to be significantly decreased in ESCA compared to normal tissues (p < 0.05). The decreased expression of BIN3 in ESCA was significantly correlated with the clinical stage (p = 0.015), T stage (p < 0.05), histological type (p < 0.001), age (p < 0.05) and gender (p < 0.05). ESCA patients with high BIN3 expression were observed to be correlated with T stage (T3 & T4), age (＜＝60), gender (male), primary therapy outcome (PD) and columnar metaplasia (No) of favorable OS. GO-KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that BIN3 was involved in endocytosis. GSEA showed that several pathways were enriched in BIN3, such as O linked glycosylation of mucins, PID HNF3B pathway, biocarta TFF pathway, WP pregnane X receptor pathway, reactome regulation of beta cell development, WP Urea cycle and associated pathways and others. BIN3 was significantly related to the infiltration level of T cells (p < 0.001), Tregs (p < 0.001), B cells (p < 0.001), NK cells (p < 0.001), and macrophage M2 (p < 0.001). In addition, BIN3 overexpression inhibited N-cadherin expression and promoted E-cadherin expression in ESCA cell lines TE-1. These results suggest that BIN3 might be a potential prognostic biomarker in ESCA. BIN3 functions as a tumor-suppressor role in ESCA, which is significantly associated with the immune infiltration of ESCA.

Clinicopathological features of esophageal carcinoma with ductal differentiation of esophageal gland

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of esophageal carcinoma with gland duct differentiation. Methods: The clinical, morphologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) features of eight cases of esophageal carcinoma with gland duct differentiation diagnosed from 2012 to 2022 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were summarized. Results: There were four males and four females, with a mean age of 68.5 (range 59-82) years. Two tumors were located in middle esophagus, five in the lower esophagus, and one in the cardia. The mean diameter was 2.4 cm (range 0.6-4.5 cm). The tumor had a bilayer epithelial structure, including the inner luminal epithelium and the outer basal epithelium. Immunohistochemistry showed that CK7 (8/8) and CK18 (8/8) were positive in the inner epithelium. p40 (8/8), p63 (8/8) and CK5/6 (8/8) were positive in the outer epithelium. SMA, calponin and CD117 were all negative. p53 mutants were found in all eight cases (strong and diffuse positivity in 6/8; complete loss of expression in 2/8). No columnar metaplasia, intestinal metaplasia and ectopic gastric mucosa were observed in the surface squamous epithelium in the cases. The mean follow-up time was 21.5 months (range 5-51 months). Seven patients survived and one patient died 31 months after surgery due to recurrence and liver metastasis. Conclusion: Esophageal carcinoma with esophageal gland duct differentiation is a rare tumor with unique histologic and IHC characteristics.

The coordinated management of ribosome and translation during injury and regeneration.

Diverse acute and chronic injuries induce damage responses in the gastrointestinal (GI) system, and numerous cell types in the gastrointestinal tract demonstrate remarkable resilience, adaptability, and regenerative capacity in response to stress. Metaplasias, such as columnar and secretory cell metaplasia, are well-known adaptations that these cells make, the majority of which are epidemiologically associated with an elevated cancer risk. On a number of fronts, it is now being investigated how cells respond to injury at the tissue level, where diverse cell types that differ in proliferation capacity and differentiation state cooperate and compete with one another to participate in regeneration. In addition, the cascades or series of molecular responses that cells show are just beginning to be understood. Notably, the ribosome, a ribonucleoprotein complex that is essential for translation on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and in the cytoplasm, is recognized as the central organelle during this process. The highly regulated management of ribosomes as key translational machinery, and their platform, rough endoplasmic reticulum, are not only essential for maintaining differentiated cell identity, but also for achieving successful cell regeneration after injury. This review will cover in depth how ribosomes, the endoplasmic reticulum, and translation are regulated and managed in response to injury (e.g., paligenosis), as well as why this is essential for the proper adaptation of a cell to stress. For this, we will first discuss how multiple gastrointestinal organs respond to stress through metaplasia. Next, we will cover how ribosomes are generated, maintained, and degraded, in addition to the factors that govern translation. Finally, we will investigate how ribosomes and translation machinery are dynamically regulated in response to injury. Our increased understanding of this overlooked cell fate decision mechanism will facilitate the discovery of novel therapeutic targets for gastrointestinal tract tumors, focusing on ribosomes and translation machinery.

Barrett's Esophagus: An Updated Review.

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a change in the distal esophageal mucosal lining, whereby metaplastic columnar epithelium replaces squamous epithelium of the esophagus. This change represents a pre-malignant mucosal transformation which has a known association with the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a risk factor for BE, other risk factors include patients who are Caucasian, age &gt; 50 years, central obesity, tobacco use, history of peptic stricture and erosive gastritis. Screening for BE remains selective based on risk factors, a screening program in the general population is not routinely recommended. Diagnosis of BE is established with a combination of endoscopic recognition, targeted biopsies, and histologic confirmation of columnar metaplasia. We aim to provide a comprehensive review of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, screening and advanced techniques of detecting and eradicating Barrett's esophagus.

Clinical Variables as Indicative Factors for Endoscopy in Adolescents with Esophageal Atresia

IntroductionGastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) occurs frequently in patients operated for esophageal atresia (EA). Longstanding esophagitis may lead to dysphagia, strictures, columnar metaplasia, and dysplasia with an increased risk of adenocarcinoma. Are clinical factors and non-invasive assessments reliable indicators for follow-up with endoscopy? Material and methodA follow-up study with inclusion of EA adolescents in Norway born between 1996 and 2002 was conducted. Clinical assessment with pH monitoring, endoscopy with biopsies, along with interviews and questionnaires regarding gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dysphagia were performed. ResultsWe examined 68 EA adolescents. 62% reported GERD by interview, 22% by questionnaire. 85% reported dysphagia by interview, 71% by questionnaire. 24-hour pH monitoring detected pathological reflux index (RI) (>7%) in 7/59 (12%). By endoscopy with biopsy 62 (92%) had histologic esophagitis, of whom 3 (4%) had severe esophagitis. Gastric metaplasia was diagnosed in twelve (18%) adolescents, intestinal metaplasia in only one (1.5%). None had dysplasia or carcinoma. Dysphagia and GERD were statistically correlated to esophagitis and metaplasia, but none of the questionnaires or interviews alone were good screening instruments with high combined sensitivity and specificity. A compound variable made by simply taking the mean of rescaled RI and dysphagia by interview showed to be the best predictor of metaplasia (85% sensitivity, 67% specificity). ConclusionThe questionnaires and interviews used in the present study were not good screening instruments alone. However, combining dysphagia score by interview and RI may be helpful in assessing which patients need endoscopy with biopsy at each individual follow-up examination. Level of EvidenceLevel II prognostic study

S410 Algorithm Training and Independent Test Set Performance for a Molecular Non-Endoscopic Test for Detection of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Barrett’s Esophagus in Multicenter Cohorts

Introduction: Sedated endoscopy for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) detection is invasive and expensive. Non-endoscopic BE/EAC detection tools have been guideline-endorsed to facilitate higher patient participation at lower cost. We previously described a promising panel of 5 methylated DNA markers (MDMs) assayed on esophageal specimens obtained by a sponge-on-a-string (SOS) cell collection device in phase II studies. We aimed to train an algorithm (establishing marker cut offs, to adjudicate samples as positive/negative) using a final MDM panel followed by testing in an independent sample set. Methods: Algorithm training samples (N=352) were prospectively collected from patients seen at 6 US medical centers. Test samples (N=125) were obtained from an independent, NIH-funded study conducted at 3 US medical centers. Cases had columnar metaplasia with intestinal metaplasia; controls had no endoscopic evidence of BE. Histology was reviewed by expert GI pathologists. The SOS device (25 mm, 10 ppi) was swallowed and withdrawn after 6-8 minutes followed by criterion standard endoscopy within 24 hours. DNA was extracted and bisulfite treated. Five MDMs were blindly assayed using the long probe quantitative amplified signal method. The algorithm was set using cross-validated logistic regression. The locked algorithm was applied to assay results from the test set. Results: Baseline characteristics of patients in training and test sets were comparable (Table). The final panel included 3 MDMs (NDRG4, VAV3, and ZNF682) and a reference marker (B3GALT6). Overall sensitivity for BE/EAC detection in the training set was 81% (95% CI 76-88%) at 90% (85-94%) specificity. Overall BE/EAC sensitivity in the test set was 88% (78-94%) at 84% (70-93%) specificity. Sensitivity for HGD and EAC was 100% in the training and test sets. Sensitivity for short segment NDBE in the test set was 63% (38-84%). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for BE/EAC detection were 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.95) and 0.94 (0.90-0.98) in the training and test sets, respectively (Figure). The algorithm was not influenced by age, sex, or smoking history. 97% of participants in the training set and 85% in the test set successfully swallowed the SOS device, which was well tolerated and safe. Conclusion: A 3-MDM panel for BE/EAC detection demonstrated excellent sensitivity for high risk BE cases in multi-center case control training and test sets.Figure 1.: Area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for a 3-marker methylated DNA panel assayed from cytology specimen extracted DNA in training and test sets. Table 1. - Baseline characteristics of patients and performance characteristics of SOS test (overall sensitivity and specificity, and stratified by BE dysplasia grade) in training and test sets Variable Training Set (N=198 controls,154 cases) Test Set(N= 44 controls,81 cases) P value (comparing training and test sets) Control Case Control Case Mean (SD) age 55 (13) 65 (10) 52 (15) 65 (11) 0.312 Male Sex (%) 102 (52) 119 (77) 17 (39) 64 (79) 0.992 Mean (SD) BMI 29 (7) 30 (6) 30 (7) 30 (6) 0.283 Ever Smokers % 77 (39) 87 (56) 18 (41) 47 (58) 0.733 Mean *SD) BE length, cm - 4 (3) - 5 (3) 0.070 Long segment BE, N, (%) - 97 (63) - 56 (69) 0.426 Short segment BE, N (%) - 57 (37) - 25 (31) BE dysplasia grade, N (%) EAC - 12 (8) - 2 (2) HGD - 18 (12) - 11 (14) LGD - 7 (4) - 10 (12) IND - 18 (12) - 14 (17) NDBE (long segment) - 57 (37) - 25 (31) NDBE (short segment) - 42 (27) - 19 (24) Training Set% Positive (95% CI) Test Set% Positive (95% CI) Overall 81% (76-88%) 88 (78-94) Dysplasia grade EAC 100 (100-100) 100 (16-100) HGD 100 (100-100) 100 (72-100) LGD 71 (0-100) 90 (55-100) IND 74 (0-100) 93 (66-100%) NDBE (long segment) 91 (73-100) 96 (80-100%) NDBE (short segment) 61 (25-100) 63 (38-84%) Control (No BE) 10 (2-21) 16 (7-30)

Morphologic Changes in the Thymus Following Chemotherapy for Anterior Mediastinal Germ Cell Tumors: A Study of 91 Cases Emphasizing Pseudoneoplastic Features.

The interpretation of postchemotherapy resections of anterior mediastinal germ cell tumors plays a critical role in determining future patient management and prognosis. Treatment-related changes in the thymus may mimic residual teratoma or microcystic-pattern yolk sac tumor. There is limited extant information concerning therapy-related pseudoneoplastic thymic alterations. To provide diagnostic assistance to distinguish nonneoplastic thymic abnormalities secondary to chemotherapy from residual germ cell tumor. We retrospectively reviewed 91 resections of primary anterior mediastinal germ cell tumors with recognizable thymic gland following cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The cohort included 90 men and 1 woman (median age, 29 years). A spectrum of thymic epithelial alterations occurred, including cystic change (macrocysts [n = 21] or microcysts [n = 20]); hyperplasia with reactive atypia (n = 8); ciliated, mucinous, or columnar cell metaplasia (n = 3); and mature squamous metaplasia (n = 2). These changes were similar to so-called acquired multilocular thymic cysts, were often contiguous with and adjacent to normal thymic epithelium, and lacked the neoplastic-type atypia seen in teratomatous elements in this setting. In 1 case, confluent microcysts closely mimicked the appearance of yolk sac tumor but lacked other distinctive features of that neoplasm and its characteristic immunoreactivity. Recognition of therapy-induced thymic changes is important to avoid misinterpretation as residual teratoma or yolk sac tumor. Continuity with and proximity to benign thymic epithelium, absence of neoplastic-type atypia, and awareness of this phenomenon are important in avoiding this pitfall.

Barrett&amp;apos;s Esophagus

Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is caused by metaplasia of squamous epithelium into columnar epithelium, mainly in the lower esophagus. Updates have been made in the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of BE since its first report as an ulcerative lesion in the lower esophagus. Columnar metaplasia of the lower esophagus has been reported as a result of gastroesophageal reflux, rather than genetic factors. When specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM) is confirmed on biopsy, it is diagnosed as BE; otherwise, it is described as columnar line esophagus (CLE). Recent recommendations state that the following two conditions must be satisfied to diagnose BE: CLE with a length ≥1 cm proximal to the gastroesophageal junction, or SIM, with goblet cells confirmed on biopsy. BE is a key risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Early detection and treatment of BE, dysplasia, and early esophageal adenocarcinoma arising from BE has become a critical issue in the USA and Europe. The prevalence of BE in Korea is likely to increase because of the increasing prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux diseases. However, there are few reports on the diagnosis and treatment of BE in Korea. In this narrative review, important historical discoveries related to BE, the anatomical structures and endoscopic findings around the gastroesophageal junction required for diagnosing CLE and BE, and a brief review of the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of BE are summarized.

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surveillance Versus Endoscopic Therapy for Barrett’s Esophagus With Low-grade Dysplasia: The SURVENT Trial: Study Rationale, Methodology, Innovation, and Implications

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surveillance Versus Endoscopic Therapy for Barrett’s Esophagus With Low-grade Dysplasia: The SURVENT Trial: Study Rationale, Methodology, Innovation, and Implications

The usefulness of Alcian blue stain in confirming goblet cells in oesophageal biopsies with columnar metaplasia

Journal of Diagnostic Pathology is a peer reviewed journal published biannually by the College of Pathologists of Sri Lanka. The journal publishes manuscripts dealing with all aspects of pathology. The aim of the journal is to update knowledge and encourage original research in the field of pathology.

Correlation of HMGB1, PON-1, MCP-1, and Periodontal P. gingivalis with Amniotic Fluid Fecal Dye.

Background This paper aims to investigate the correlation between high mobility group protein-1 (HMG-b1), antioxidant enzyme-1 (paraoxon-1, PON-1), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, MCP-1), P. gingivalis, and MSAF. Materials and Methods The total sample size comprised of 73 cases in both groups. These patients were further subdivided into 2 groups: the MSAF group and the control group. 38 women were in the MSAF group and 35 women with term amniotic fluid serum were in the control group. The MSAF group was selected as a full-term singleton amniotic fluid fecal infection group. Clinical data were collected, and specimens were collected. Fecal staining of amniotic fluid and full-term amniotic fluid removes the placenta and umbilical cord blood. The expression of HMGB1 in the placenta was observed by immune-histochemical staining of MSAF and control groups. The content of PON-1 in cord blood was determined by ELISA. Results Correlation between maternal and neonatal clinical data and MSAF was done; MSAF group mean gestational age was 41.38 ± 1.40 weeks; control group mean gestational age was 39.20 ± 1.24 weeks. This study found no correlation between the birth weight, maternal age, sex, first/transmaternal, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, and anemia between the MSAF and control group with nonsignificant P value (P > 0.05). However, the fatal age, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, umbilical cord abnormalities, placental abnormalities, and neonatal asphyxia factors were statistically different with a significant P value of <0.05 between both groups. HMGB1 and Periodontal P. gingivalis are mostly expressed in placental trophoblast, vascular endothelial cells, and amniotic epithelial and interstitial cells. After HE staining of 72 placentas by HE in MSAF and control, 6 had acute chorioamnionitis (5.1 control), 32 had chronic (23.9), 35 had abnormal placentas, and three in MSAF had chorionic columnar metaplasia. In immune-histochemistry experiments, the HMGB1 expression intensity of placental tissue was higher in the MSAF group (P < 0.05); however, the level of PON-1 was lower in the MSAF group as compared to the controls (P < 0.05). Conclusions Gestational age and placental abnormalities are clinical high-risk factors for MSAF. HMGB1, PON-1, MCP-1, and Periodontal P. gingivalis may be involved in the development of MSAF, suggesting an oxidative/antioxidant imbalance with inflammation, and may be one of the mechanisms for MSAF development.

Esophageal abnormalities and the risk for gastroesophageal cancers—a histopathology-register-based study in Sweden

BackgroundThe poor survival of patients with gastroesophageal cancers may improve if additional esophageal precursor lesions to Barrett’s esophagus and squamous dysplasia are identified. We estimated the risk for gastroesophageal cancers among patients with various histopathological abnormalities in the esophagus, including Barrett’s esophagus, subdivided by histopathological types.MethodsHistopathology data from esophageal biopsies obtained 1979–2014 were linked with several national population-based registers in Sweden. Patients were followed from 2 years after the first biopsy date until cancer, death, emigration, esophagectomy/gastrectomy or end of follow-up, 31st of December 2016, whichever came first. We estimated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) as measures of relative risk with the Swedish general population as reference.ResultsIn total 367 esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) cases were ascertained during 831,394 person-years of follow-up. The incidence rate (IR) for EAC was 0.1 per 1000 person-years for normal morphology, 0.2–0.5 for inflammatory changes, and 0.8–2.9 for metaplasia. The IR was 1.0 per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval 0.7–1.3) among patients with non-dysplastic intestinal metaplasia, 0.9 (0.8–1.1) in non-dysplastic gastric/glandular metaplasia and 2.9 (2.0–4.2) among columnar metaplasia patients with low-grade dysplasia. The SIRs were 11.7 (95% confidence interval 8.6–15.5), 12.0 (10.0–14.2) and 30.2 (20.5–42.8), respectively. The SIRs for gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA) were moderately elevated.ConclusionsFor the first time, we demonstrate that patients with esophageal inflammatory and other metaplastic abnormalities than Barrett’s esophagus have an increased risk of EAC and GCA compared to the general population. Moreover, patients with different histopathologic subtypes of Barrett’s esophagus have a comparable risk for EAC.

A Comparative Study between Nissen's Fundoplication with or without Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Treatment of Barrett’s Oesophagus: a Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background It is already known that Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a premalignant condition in which the normal squamous epithelium of the distal esophagus is replaced by columnar epithelium (intestinal metaplasia or gastric metaplasia) due to GERD. Most observers believe that there is a progression from intestinal metaplasia to low-grade dysplasia (LGD) to highgrade dysplasia (HGD) to cancer. The relative risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with BE appears to be 30-fold higher. Conventional therapies include medical treatment (profound acid inhibition), endoscopic treatment (like endoscopic mucosal resection) and surgical treatment (fundoplication). Methodology Types of studies: Published studies about the efficacy of Nissen’s Fundoplication with or without Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the treatment of Barrett’s Oesophagus (carried out in the period between 2015 – 2020), types of participants Patients with clinically proven Barrett’s Oesophagus diagnosed by endoscopy and biopsy, types of interventions Nissen’s Fundoplication (Open or Laparoscopic) with or without Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, types of outcome measures Outcome of treatment in the form of Complete Remission of Columnar Metaplasia of the oesophageal mucosa or regression in recurrence rate as proved by follow-up endoscopy. Results The strategy of endoscopic therapy for Barrett’s metaplasia, dysplasia and/or intramucosal cancer along with fundoplication results in similar durability and recurrence rates when compared to patients being managed with PPIs following endoscopic therapy. However, fundoplication along with endoscopic therapy is superior to either of them alone in preventing further progression of disease and the development of cancer, particularly in refractory patients. Fundoplication is an important strategy along with endoscopic therapy for Barrett’s to achieve and maintain CR-IM, and to facilitate the eradication of persistent dysplasia. Conclusion Endoscopic mucosal resection after Nissen's Fundoplication is a safe modality, with high rate of success in complete eradication of BE in symptomatic GERD patients, especially those with severe anatomical impairment in distal esophageal segment. As a concurrent procedure, endoscopic procedures may be beneficial in the terms of reducing the early recurrence rates, which seems to be important issue during the management of BE. By doing synchronous endoscopic procedures and fundoplication, one might observe a true anatomy of esophagogastric junction in its entirety and might be able to truly observe the distal extent of columnar esophagus.

Reactivation of the Hedgehog pathway in esophageal progenitors turns on an embryonic-like program to initiate columnar metaplasia.

Columnar metaplasia of the esophagus is the main risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. There is a lack of evidence to demonstrate that esophageal progenitors can be the source of columnar metaplasia. In this study, using transgenic mouse models, lineage tracing, single-cell RNA sequencing, and transcriptomic and epigenetic profiling, we found that the activation of the Hedgehog pathway in esophageal cells modifies their differentiation status invivo. This process involves an initial step of dedifferentiation into embryonic-like esophageal progenitors. Moreover, a subset of these cells undergoes full squamous-to-columnar conversion and expresses selected intestinal markers. These modifications of cell fate are associated with remodeling of the chromatin and the appearance of Sox9. Using a conditional knockout mouse, we show that Sox9 is required for columnar conversion but not for the step of dedifferentiation. These results provide insight into the mechanisms by which esophageal cells might initiate columnar metaplasia.

The Evolution of the Definition and Diagnosis of Barrett Esophagus: A Historical Perspective

Historical definitions of Barrett esophagus (BE) have depended on 2 beliefs: the esophagus is a squamous lined tube and the stomach is a columnar lined sac. Norman Barrett, in 1957, recognized that columnar lining in the tubular esophagus was reflux-induced metaplasia of squamous epithelium, leading to the present definition of BE. Recent evidence that gastric overdistension results in acid exposure of distal esophageal squamous epithelium, causing progressive columnar metaplasia, damage to the lower esophageal sphincter, and dilatation of the abdominal esophagus. This is presently mistaken at endoscopy for proximal stomach. The future definition of BE will likely include intra-sphincteric BE.

GATA4 blocks squamous epithelial cell gene expression in human esophageal squamous cells

GATA4 promotes columnar epithelial cell fate during gastric development. When ectopically expressed in the developing mouse forestomach, the tissue emerges as columnar-like rather than stratified squamous with gene expression changes that parallel those observed in the pre-malignant squamous to columnar metaplasia known as Barrett’s esophagus (BE). GATA4 mRNA up-regulation and gene amplification occur in BE and its associated cancer, esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and GATA4 gene amplification correlates with poor patient outcomes. Here, we explored the effect of ectopic expression of GATA4 in mature human esophageal squamous epithelial cells. We found that GATA4 expression in esophageal squamous epithelial cells compromised squamous cell marker gene expression and up-regulated expression of the canonical columnar cell cytokeratin KRT8. We observed GATA4 occupancy in the p63, KRT5, and KRT15 promoters, suggesting that GATA4 directly represses expression of squamous epithelial cell marker genes. Finally, we verified GATA4 protein expression in BE and EAC and found that exposure of esophageal squamous epithelial cells to acid and bile, known BE risk factors, induced GATA4 mRNA expression. We conclude that GATA4 suppresses expression of genes marking the stratified squamous epithelial cell lineage and that this repressive action by GATA4 may have implications in BE and EAC.

Barrett's Oesophagus and Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery-IFSO 2020 Position Statement.

The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) has been playing an integral role in educating both the metabolic surgical and the medical community at large about the importance of surgical and/or endoscopic interventions in treating adiposity-based chronic diseases. The occurrence of chronic conditions following bariatric/metabolic surgery (BMS), such as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and columnar (intestinal) epithelial metaplasia of the distal oesophagus (also known as Barrett's oesophagus (BE)), has long been discussed in the metabolic surgical and medical community. Equally, the risk of neoplastic progression of Barrett's oesophagus to oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and the resulting requirement for surgery are the source of some concern for many involved in the care of these patients, as the surgical alteration of the gastrointestinal tract may lead to impaired reconstructive options. As such, there is a requirement for guidance of the community.The IFSO commissioned a task force to elucidate three aspects of the presenting problem: First, to determine what the estimated incidence of Barrett's oesophagus is in patients presenting for BMS; second, to determine the frequency at which Barrett's oesophagus may develop following BMS (with a particular focus on the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)); and third, to determine if regression of Barrett's oesophagus may occur following BMS given the close relationship of obesity and the development of BE/EAC. Based on these findings, a position statement regarding the management of this pathology in the context of BMS was developed. The following position statement is issued by the IFSO Barrett's Oesophagus task force andapproved by the IFSO Scientific Committee and Executive Board. This statement is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence. It will be reviewed regularly.

Thromboembolism and Fluid Collections Years Following Gastric Bypass: the Relevance of the Remnant

The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) has been playing an integral role in educating both the metabolic surgical and the medical community at large about the importance of surgical and/or endoscopic interventions in treating adiposity-based chronic diseases. The occurrence of chronic conditions following bariatric/metabolic surgery (BMS), such asgastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and columnar (intestinal) epithelial metaplasia of the distal oesophagus (also known as Barrett's oesophagus (BE)), has long been discussed in the metabolic surgical and medical community. Equally, the risk of neoplastic progression of Barrett's oesophagus to oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and the resulting requirement for surgery are the source of some concern for many involved in the care of these patients, as the surgical alteration of the gastrointestinal tract may lead to impaired reconstructive options. As such, there is are quirement for guidance of the community.The IFSO commissioned a task force to elucidate three aspects of the presenting problem: First, to determine what the estimated incidence of Barrett's oesophagus is in patients presenting for BMS; second, to determine the frequency at which Barrett's oesophagus may develop following BMS (with a particular focus on the laparoscopicsleeve gastrectomy (LSG)); and third, to determine if regression of Barrett's oesophagus may occur following BMS given the close relationship of obesity and the development of BE/EAC. Based on these findings, a position statement regarding the management of this pathology in the context of BMS was developed. The following position statement is issued by the IFSO Barrett's Oesophagus task force and approved by the IFSO Scientific Committee and Executive Board. This statement is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence. It will be reviewed regularly.