TUESDAY, 20 April 1999, was the date of the infamous Columbine massacre. On Friday of that week, a teacher found a threatening letter in the computer room of Brazosport High School, which is in Freeport, Texas.1 School officials suspected that a particular student had left the letter. They also knew that the suspect spent idle time at a group of picnic tables in the school courtyard, where 14 other students tended to congregate. Although these students hung there for lunch and traveled in the same social circles, most of them were casual acquaintances rather than close friends. On Monday, April 26, after an investigation, the school officials had the primary suspect arrested and charged with making terrorist threats. On Tuesday, April 27, as a continuation of the investigation, officers from the local police department entered the high school, at the behest of the school administration. The police officers rounded up the 14 students, frisked them, handcuffed them, and led them out of the building. They placed the students in police cars and transported them to the municipal courthouse. Neither the police officers nor the school officials gave any reason for the action, but the officers allegedly directed profane language at the students on the way to the court. Moreover, they threatened to place the students in the municipal jail, where they would suffer mightily at the hands of the inmates. On arrival at the municipal building, the police ordered the students to remain in the empty courtroom, under threat of five-year prison terms if they left. These confrontations and the detention took place without a warrant. After the students spent more than an hour in the courtroom, the police told them to telephone their parents and have them come to the municipal building. Once they had all arrived, the police and the school's principal hastily lectured the parents and the students, who were then allowed to depart. There was one exception. The mother of one of the students, Jeremy D., insisted that she could not wait any longer in the courtroom and had to leave with her son. Before allowing them to leave, a detective interrogated Jeremy as to whether he knew how to make a bomb. Jeremy said no, whereupon the detective proceeded to explain how to do so. The detective went on to say that he knew Jeremy had done nothing wrong and that the entire exercise had been a show of force, intended to impress upon the students that the authorities were monitoring them. The next morning, the principal convened a schoolwide assembly to explain the prior day's happenings. At the assembly, he pronounced the school free of terrorists and assured the students that they were all safe. He further informed the student body that no one should bother the students who had been arrested the previous day, as they had done nothing wrong. This admonition apparently had little effect. Some of the detained students complained of harassment by other students, such as accusations that they were planning a Columbine-style incident at the school. Jeremy twice received in-school suspensions as a result of his efforts to exonerate himself before the students in his geometry class. Having experienced several sleepless nights, like his fellow detainees, Jeremy fell asleep in class, only to be aroused by a glass of water thrown at him by his teacher. This led to riotous laughter, causing him further humiliation and embarrassment. When his mother met with the principal to complain about this incident, he urged her to have him transferred to another school or to home school him. Although Jeremy stayed the course, one of his fellow detainees opted for home schooling rather than face the daily pressures brought on by her unrelenting peers. On 15 February 2000, Jeremy and two others from the detained group filed suit in federal court. They claimed, in their amended complaint, that the school and police officials had violated their Fourth and 14th Amendment rights. …
Read full abstract