Surgery For Colorectal Endometriosis Research Articles

Surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis: an updated review.

This review aims to summarize recent literature on the surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis. The last decade has seen a surge in the number of studies on bowel endometriosis, with a focus on preoperative evaluation, perioperative management, surgical approach, and surgical outcomes. Many of these studies have originated from large-volume referral centers with varying surgical approaches and philosophies. Colorectal surgery for endometriosis seems to have a positive impact on patient symptoms, quality of life, and fertility. However, these benefits must be weighed against a significant risk of postoperative complications and the potential for long-term bowel or bladder dysfunction, especially for more radical procedures involving the lower rectum. Importantly, most studies regarding surgical technique and outcomes have been limited by their observational design. The surgical management of bowel endometriosis is complex and should be approached by a multidisciplinary team. Methodical preoperative evaluation, including appropriate imaging, is vital for surgical planning and patient counseling. The decision to perform a more conservative or radical excision is nuanced and remains an area of controversy. High quality studies in the form of multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed before clear recommendations can be made.

To drain or not to drain: A propensity score analysis of abdominal drainage after colorectal surgery for endometriosis

AimTo assess the benefit of prophylactic abdominal drainage (AD) after colorectal surgery for endometriosis. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 215 patients who underwent colorectal surgery for endometriosis using a mini-invasive approach in our center from February 2019 to July 2023. A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis (1:1 ratio) identified two groups of patients with similar characteristics. Postoperative outcomes were then compared. ResultsIn the unmatched cohort, 151 patients (70 %) had AD at the end of surgery and 64 (30 %) did not. Clinical characteristics and surgical procedures were comparable between the groups after PSM. After PSM, AD was associated with a longer hospital stay (p < 0.001) and a greater number of postoperative complications (p = 0.03). There were no differences for readmission, repeat surgery, or severe postoperative complications. ConclusionIn this retrospective cohort of patients undergoing colorectal resection for endometriosis using a mini-invasive approach, prophylactic AD was not found to be beneficial.

Risk factors for major complications following colorectal resections for endometriosis in the USA

PurposeWe aimed to describe the incidence and identify risk factors for the occurrence of short-term major posto-perative complications following colorectal resection for endometriosis.MethodsA cohort study using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2012–2020. We included patients with a primary diagnosis of endometriosis who underwent colon or rectal resections for endometriosis.ResultsOf 755 women who underwent colorectal resection, 495 (65.6%) had laparoscopic surgery and 260 (34.4%) had open surgery. The major complication rate was 13.5% (n = 102). Women who underwent open surgery had a higher proportion of major complications (n = 53, 20.4% vs. n = 49, 9.9%, p < 0.001). In a multivariable regression analysis, Black race (aOR 95%CI 2.81 (1.60–4.92), p < 0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (aOR 95%CI 3.02 (1.42–6.43), p = 0.004), hypertension (aOR 95%CI 1.89 (1.08–3.30), p = 0.025), laparotomy (aOR 95%CI 1.64 (1.03–3.30), p = 0.025), concomitant enterotomy (aOR 95%CI 3.02 (1.26–7.21), p = 0.013), and hysterectomy (aOR 95%CI 2.59 (1.62–4.15), p < 0.001) were independently associated with major post-operative complications. In a subanalysis of laparoscopies only, Hispanic ethnicity, chronic hypertension, lysis of bowel adhesions, and hysterectomy were independently associated with major complications. In a subanalysis of laparotomies only, Black race and hysterectomy were independently positively associated with the occurrence of major complications.ConclusionThis study provides a current population-based estimate of short-term complications after surgery for colorectal endometriosis in the USA. The identified risk factors for complications can assist during preoperative shared decision-making and informed consent process.

Changes in hospital consumption of opioid and non-opioid analgesics after colorectal endometriosis surgery.

The aim of this study was to analyze postoperative consumption of analgesics during hospitalization following colorectal surgery for endometriosis. We conducted a retrospective study at Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France from February 2019 to December 2021. One hundred sixty-two patients underwent colorectal surgery: eighty-nine (55%) by robotic and seventy-three (45%) by conventional laparoscopy. The type of procedure had an impact on acetaminophen and nefopam consumed per day: consumption for colorectal shaving, discoid resection, and segmental resection was, respectively, 2(0.5), 2.1(0.6), 2.4(0.6) g/day (p = 10-3), and 25(7), 30(14), 31(11) mg/day (p = 0.03). The total amount of tramadol consumed was greater following robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy (322(222) mg vs 242(292) mg, p = 0.04). We observed a switch in analgesic consumption over the years: tramadol was used by 70% of patients in 2019 but only by 7.1% in 2021 (p < 10-3); conversely, ketoprofen was not used in 2019, but was consumed by 57% of patients in 2021 (p < 10-3). A history of abdominal surgery (OR = 0.37 (0.16-0.78, p = 0.011) and having surgery in 2020 rather than in 2019 (OR = 0.10 (0.04-0.24, p < 10-3)) and in 2021 than in 2019 (OR = 0.08 (0.03-0.20, p < 10-3)) were the only variables independently associated with the risk of opioid use. We found that neither clinical characteristics nor intraoperative findings had an impact on opioid consumption in this setting, and that it was possible to rapidly modify in-hospital analgesic consumption modalities by significantly reducing opioid consumption in favor of NSAIDS or nefopam.

Combination of laparoscopic side-to-end colorectal anastomosis and vaginal nose (natural orifice specimen extraction) surgery for colorectal endometriosis: Technique and outcomes

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of combining side-to-end anastomosis and vaginal NOSE (Natural orifice specimen extraction) surgery in colorectal endometriosis. Material and methods: We included 11 patients treated with laparoscopic side-to-end colorectal anastomosis and vaginal NOSE surgery between January 2019 and May 2021. We questioned the visual analog score (VAS) for pain symptoms, the short form-36 (SF-36) for health survey questionnaire, The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), EHP-5 for endometriosis health profile, The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), OAB-V8 for overactive bladder symptoms and Constipation Severity Instrument (CSI). Results: VAS, EHP-5, and SF-36 scores were better at postoperative third and sixth months than preoperative values ( p &lt; 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in terms of FSFI, OAB-V8, HADS, and the CSI. Conclusions: Laparoscopic side-to-end anastomosis with vaginal NOSE surgery is feasible, scarless, and could be offered to patients with deep symptomatic bowel endometriosis.

Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic nerve-sparing colorectal surgery for endometriosis

Laparoscopic rectosigmoid resection for endometriosis is usually performed with the section of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) distal to the left colic artery (low-tie ligation). This study was to determine outcomes in IMA-sparing surgery in endometriosis cases. A single-center retrospective study based on the analysis of clinical notes of women who underwent laparoscopic rectosigmoid segmental resection and IMA-sparing surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis with bowel involvement between March the 1st, 2018 and February the 29th, 2020 in a referral hospital. During the study period, 1497 patients had major gynecological surgery in our referral center, of whom 253 (17%) for endometriosis. Of the 100 patients (39%) who had bowel endometriosis, 56 underwent laparoscopic nerve-sparing rectosigmoid segmental resection and IMA-sparing surgery was performed in 53 cases (95%). Short-term complications occurred in 4 cases (7%) without any case of anastomotic leak. Preservation of the IMA in colorectal surgery for endometriosis is feasible, safe and enables a tension-free anastomosis without an increase of postoperative complication rates.

Serial assessment of inflammatory parameters for prediction of septic complications following surgery for colorectal endometriosis : Adescriptive, retrospective study.

PurposeTo assess whether C‑reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC) and body temperature changes are suitable parameters for the early detection of septic complications following resection of colorectal deep endometriosis (DE).MethodsRetrospective data analysis of CRP, WBC and body temperature courses following colorectal surgery for DE at a tertiary referral center for endometriosis.ResultsOut of 183 surgeries performed, 10 major surgical complications were observed, including 4 anastomotic leakages (AL 2%) and 2 rectovaginal fistulae (RVF 1%). In the presence of a lower gastrointestinal tract (GIT)-related septic complication or abdominal wall abscess, serum CRP levels were increased starting at postoperative day 2–3. A cut-off value of 10 mg/dl on day 4 for prediction of early septic complications could be verified (area under the curve 0.94, obtained by receiver operating characteristics analysis, sensitivity 88%, specificity 90%, positive predictive value 32%, negative predictive value 99%). Additionally, most patients with early septic complications exhibited increased WBC levels starting mainly from day 3–4; however, increased inflammatory parameters could not be observed in one patient with an RVF. Body temperature did not prove useful for early discrimination between uncomplicated cases and those with early septic complications.ConclusionRelevant elevations of serum CRP and WBC levels were demonstrated in patients with early septic complications following surgery for colorectal DE starting at postoperative day 2–4. The cut-off value of 10 mg/dl for CRP levels may serve as an early predictor for lower GIT-related septic complications but should be used with caution in women with suspected RVF development.Supplementary InformationThe online version of this article (10.1007/s00508-021-01916-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Endometriosis surgery and preservation of fertility, what surgeons should know

Colorectal surgeons often participate in the multidisciplinary management of young females with endometriosis. Complications of endometriosis as well as its management often result in infertility since they can involve all pelvic organs including the procreative organs: uterus, ovaries and fallopian tubes. Complete excision of all endometriotic lesions should not be performed at the expense of irreversible destruction of the procreative organs; definitive infertility should not be the price to pay in order to obtain an improvement of the painful symptoms caused by endometriosis. Surgery for ovarian endometriomas should be specifically adapted to the patient's desire for future conception and to her preoperative ovarian reserve. Two main techniques are used to treat ovarian endometriomas: ovarian cystectomy excises the wall of the cyst while ablation consists of destruction of the internal surface of the cyst. The use of mono polar or biolar coagulation for cyst ablation is strongly contra-indicated. Ablation using laser or plasma energy has resulted in comparable rates of post-operative pregnancy to those obtained by ovarian cystectomy. Patients who wish to delay their attempt to conceive for some period of time, should be placed on long-term oral contraception with prevention of menstruation to reduce the risk of recurrent endometriosis. When surgery for colorectal endometriosis is necessary, the laparoscopic approach increases the chances of spontaneous conception compared to laparotomy. Surgery for deep-seated endometriosis has been accompanied by a high rate of spontaneous conception and successful pregnancy and does not seem to decrease the chances for conception by in vitro fertilization.

Fertility outcomes in women experiencing severe complications after surgery for colorectal endometriosis

What are the fertility outcomes in women wishing to conceive after experiencing a severe complication from surgical removal of colorectal endometriosis? The pregnancy rate (PR) among women who wished to conceive after a severe complication of surgery for colorectal endometriosis was 41.2% (spontaneously for 80%, after ART procedure for 20%). While the long-term benefit of surgery on pain and quality of life is well documented for women with colorectal endometriosis, it exposes women to the risk of severe complications. However, little is known about fertility outcomes in women experiencing such severe postoperative complications. This retrospective cohort study included women who experienced a severe complication after surgery for colorectal endometriosis between January 2004 and June 2014, and who wished to conceive. A total of 53 patients met the inclusion criteria. The fertility outcome was available for 48 women, who were therefore included in the analysis. The median follow-up was 5 years. All the women underwent complete removal of colorectal endometriosis. Postoperative severe complications were defined as grades III-IV of the Clavien-Dindo classification. Fertility outcomes, PR and cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR), were estimated. Most women experienced a grade IIIb complication (83.3%). Of 48 women, 20 became pregnant (overall PR: 41.2%); spontaneously for 16 (80%) and after ART procedure for 4 (20%). The median interval between surgery and first pregnancy was 3 years. The live birth rate was 14/48 (29.2%). The 5-year CPR was 46%. A lower CPR was found for women who experienced anastomotic leakage (with or without rectovaginal fistula) (P = 0.02) or deep pelvic abscess (with or without anastomotic leakage) (P = 0.04). Due to a lack of information, no sub-analysis was done to investigate other parameters potentially impacting fertility outcomes. The PR for our population was slightly lower to that observed in the literature for women who experience such surgery without consideration for the occurrence of complications. However, 'severe complications' covers a range of conditions which are likely to have a very different impacts on fertility. Even if the PR and CPR appear satisfactory, septic complications can negatively impact fertility outcomes. Rapid ART may be a good option for these patients. No funding was required for the current study. Pr H. Roman reported personal fees from Plasma Surgical Inc. (Roswell, GA, USA) for participating in a symposium and a masterclass, in which he presented his experience in the use of PlasmaJet®. None of the other authors declared any conflict of interest. N/A.

Medical treatment or surgery for colorectal endometriosis? Results of a shared decision-making approach.

What is the degree of patient satisfaction in women with symptomatic colorectal endometriosis who choose medical or surgical treatment after a shared decision-making (SDM) process? The degree of satisfaction with treatment was high both in women who chose medical treatment with a low-dose oral contraceptive (OCP) or a progestin, and in those who chose to undergo surgical resection of bowel endometriosis. Hormonal therapies and surgery for colorectal endometriosis have been investigated in non-comparative studies with inconsistent results. Parallel cohort study conducted on 87 women referring to our centre with an indication to surgery for colorectal endometriosis. A standardised SDM process was adopted, allowing women to choose their preferred treatment. Median follow-up was 40 [18-60] months in the medical therapy group and 45 [30-67] in the surgery group. Patients with endometriosis infiltrating the proximal rectum, the rectosigmoid junction, and the sigmoid, not causing severe sub-occlusive symptoms were enroled. A total of 50 patients chose treatment with an OCP (n = 12) or a progestin (n = 38), whereas 37 women confirmed their previous indication to surgery. Patient satisfaction was graded according to a 5-category scale. Variations in bowel and pain symptoms were measured by means of a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Constipation was assessed with the Knowles-Eccersley-Scott Symptom Questionnaire (KESS), health-related quality of life with the Short Form-12 questionnaire (SF-12), psychological status with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) and sexual functioning with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Six women in the medical therapy group requested surgery because of drug inefficacy (n = 3) or intolerance (n = 3). Seven major complications were observed in the surgery group (19%). At 12-month follow-up, 39 (78%) women in the medical therapy group were satisfied with their treatment, compared with 28 (76%) in the surgery group (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-4.15; intention-to-treat analysis). Corresponding figures at final follow-up assessment were 72% in the former group and 65% in the latter one (adjusted OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.62-4.85). The 60-month cumulative proportion of dissatisfaction-free participants was 71% in the medical therapy group compared with 61% in the surgery group (P = 0.61); the Hazard incidence rate ratio was 1.21 (95% CI, 0.57-2.62). Intestinal complaints were ameliorated by both treatments. Significant between-group differences in favour of medical treatment were observed at 12-month follow-up in diarrhoea, dysmenorrhoea, non-menstrual pelvic pain and SF-12 physical component scores. The total HADS score improved significantly in both groups, whereas the total FSFI score improved only in women who chose medical therapy. As treatments were not randomly assigned, selection bias and confounding are likely. The small sample size exposes to the risk of type II errors. When adequately informed and empowered through a SDM process, most patients with non-occlusive colorectal endometriosis who had already received a surgical indication, preferred medical therapy. The possibility of choosing the preferred treatment may allow maximisation of the potential effect of the interventions. This study was financed by Italian fiscal contribution '5 × 1000'-Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca-devolved to Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy. P.V., M.P.F., R.R., D.D., A.R., P.M., O.D.G. and M.C. declare that they have no conflicts of interest. E.S. received grants from Ferring and Serono.

Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Endometriosis and its Impact upon Fertility: An Updated Australian Series of 307 Cases

Introduction Colorectal involvement occurs in up to 12% of cases of endometriosis. Various surgical options for its management have been described, including segmental resection and disc excision, with debate surrounding indications for surgery and the impact of such procedures. The current study aimed to describe the experiences of three Australian gynaecologists regarding laparoscopic bowel surgery for colorectal endometriosis. Methods The records of three gynaecological surgeons were analysed for patients who underwent surgical removal of colorectal endometriosis by way of appendicectomy, bowel disc excision and/or segmental resection, between 1999 and 2012. Results A total of 307 patients were identified. Sixteen (5.2%) underwent appendicectomy, 146 (47.6%) underwent disc excision, 126 (41.0%) underwent segmental resection and 19 (6.2%) underwent simultaneous procedures. The majority of procedures were performed laparoscopically (265 of 307; 86.3%). Nineteen procedures (6.2%) were planned laparotomies due to the known extent of disease. Twenty-three procedures were converted from laparoscopy to laparotomy (conversion rate of 7.5%). Complications occurred in 35 of the 307 cases (11.4%). Sixty-seven women amongst the 122 wishing to conceive post-operatively achieved at least one pregnancy (pregnancy rate of 54.9%). Of the 84 pregnancies achieved amongst the 67 women who conceived, 49 (58.3%) were achieved through assisted reproductive technologies, and 31 pregnancies (36.9%) were conceived spontaneously. This information was unavailable for 4 pregnancies (4.8%). Conclusions The current series demonstrates that laparoscopic surgery for severe disease is feasible in specialised centres. Furthermore, such surgery may have a positive impact upon post-operative fertility.

Résection segmentaire pour endométriose colorectale : existe-t-il des alternatives ?

Colorectal surgery for endometriosis is increasingly performed, but its assessment is still incomplete, especially regarding its impact on quality of life, the recurrence rate and subsequent fertility. Segmental resection is the technique most often performed and best evaluated with a proven efficacy but associated with significant morbidity. Alternatives to segmental resection consisting of shaving rectal resection, discoid resection or superficial resection have recently been proposed to provide equivalent efficacy while decreasing morbidity. To date, data are insufficient to clarify the respective indications of segmental resection and alternatives. Only randomized trials will resolve the existing controversy.