Colorectal Obstruction Research Articles

Impact of a novel-covered colonic stent in obstructive colon cancer.

Although the short-term outcomes of bridge-to-surgery (BTS) procedures using self-expandable metal stents are favorable, concerns remain regarding worsened prognosis due to tissue injury in the tumor area. Herein, we describe a newly developed covered stent, the Kawasumi Jabara colonic stent™, designed to reduce tissue damage/injury associated with stent-related complications in BTS procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Kawasumi Jabara colonic stent as a BTS for obstructive colorectal cancer (OCC). This multicenter retrospective observational study included 44 OCC patients who underwent BTS with stents at four facilities between September 2020 and November 2022. The groups of patients receiving the Kawasumi Jabara and non-covered colonic stents were designated Groups C and NC, respectively. Treatment outcomes related to stent placement and surgery were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Groups NC and C (n = 34 and 10, respectively) showed no significant differences in sex, age, tumor location, histological type, Colorectal Obstruction Scoring System (CROSS) score, or cStage; however, the stent placement duration was shorter in Group C. No significant differences were found in terms of the technical and clinical success rates for stent placement. Stent dislocation was observed in 0 and 2 cases in Groups C and NC, respectively. PSM analysis between eight cases, each from Groups C and NC, revealed no significant differences in stent-related or surgical outcomes between the groups. However, regarding the gross injury score in the resected specimens, Group C had a lower score than Group NC (1.8 vs. 5.5), and the proportion of pathological tissue injury involving deeper layers was also lower in Group C (37.5% vs. 100%). Compared to conventional non-covered stents, the Kawasumi Jabara colonic stent™ demonstrated favorable safety during stent insertion, retention, and surgery, with only mild tissue injury.

Radiation Exposure with Self-Expandable Metallic Stent versus Transanal Decompression Tube for Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: A Post Hoc Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Background: Although several reports have compared the outcomes of self-expandable metallic stent (SEMSs) and transanal decompression tube (TDT) placement for malignant colorectal obstruction (MCO), few studies have compared the radiation exposure (RE) associated with these two procedures. Consequently, we aimed to compare the RE of SEMS and TDT placements for MCO using propensity score matching (PSM) in a multi-center, prospective observational study. Methods: This study investigated the clinical data of 236 patients who underwent SEMS or TDT placement. The air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r: mGy) and air kerma-area product (PKA; Gycm2) were measured and compared between SEMS and TDT groups after PSM. Results: After PSM, 61 patients were identified in each group. The median Ka,r in the SEMS group was significantly greater than that in the TDT group (77.4 vs. 55.6 mGy; p = 0.025) across the entire cohort. With respect to subgroup analyses by location, in the rectum, the median Ka, r and PKA were significantly greater in the SEMS group than in the TDT group (172.9 vs. 34.6 mGy; p = 0.001; and 46.0 vs. 18.1 Gycm2; p = 0.006, respectively). However, in the colon, the RE parameters did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusions: TDT might be a more suitable option for decompression in patients with malignant rectal obstruction due to its lower RE and technical advantages. Conversely, SEMS placement is recommended as the first decompression method to treat malignant colonic obstruction, in line with the current guidelines.

A New Self-Expandable Metallic Stent with Low Axial Force and a High Axial Force Zero-Border Shows a Very Low Perforation Rate in Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: A Japanese Multicenter Prospective Study.

Background: Recently, there has been a significant increase in the utilization of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) for treating malignant colorectal obstructions through colorectal stenting. The mechanical properties of SEMSs are usually considered to affect clinical outcomes of patients with malignant colorectal obstructions. Methods: This single-arm, prospective, multicenter study of SEMS with a lower axial force and high axial force zero-border included 200 patients with malignant colorectal obstruction. Technical and clinical success, stent patency, and adverse events associated with SEMS placement were evaluated. Results: One patient was excluded, and 199 patients were evaluated. The treatment intent was bridge-to-surgery in 129 and palliation in 70 patients. Technical and clinical success rates were 99.5% and 97.0%, respectively. The percentage of the ColoRectal Obstruction Scoring System scores of 3 or higher improved significantly from 19.2% before placement to 93.9% after placement. Clinical success was not achieved in five patients due to insufficient stent expansion in four patients and stent occlusion in one patient. Only one patient underwent emergency surgery for perforation of the proximal colon, far from where the stent was placed; the rescue procedure was not performed, despite no improvement in proximal dilatation due to insufficient stent expansion. Among the palliation cohort, 15 patients received chemotherapy, including molecular-targeted agents such as bevacizumab. There were no fatal cases related to stent placement. Conclusions: For management of malignant colorectal obstruction, this newly developed SEMS with low axial force and a high axial force zero-border showed high technical and clinical success rates, and an extremely low perforation rate (0.5%).

Self-expandable Metal Stents for Malignant Colorectal Obstruction

Self-expandable Metal Stents for Malignant Colorectal Obstruction

Palliative large-bowel decompression for colorectal obstruction in patients with unresectable locally advanced cancer and carcinomatosis

Palliative large-bowel decompression for colorectal obstruction in patients with unresectable locally advanced cancer and carcinomatosis

Colonic stent as a bridge to surgery versus emergency rection for malignant left-sided colorectal obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The role of self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) implantation as a bridge to surgery in malignant left-sided colorectal obstruction (MLCO) remains controversial. To evaluate the safety of SEMS implantation versus emergency surgery (ER) in the treatment of MLCO. Four major literature databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science) were searched to collect articles published before April 20, 2023. After determining random or fixed-effect models based on heterogeneity tests, odds ratios (RR) or standardized mean differences (SMD) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Nineteen randomized controlled studies were included. The main outcomes included overall tumor recurrence rate, 30-day mortality rate, and overall incidence of complications. Secondary outcomes included mortality-related indicators, tumor recurrence-related indicators, surgery-related indicators, and other relevant indicators. The study found that there was no significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate between the SEMS group and the er group. However, the SEMS group had a lower overall incidence of complications (RR = 0.787, P = .004), lower incision infection rate (RR = 0.472, P = .003), shorter operation time (SMD = -0.591, P = .000), lower intraoperative blood loss (SMD = -1.046, P = .000), lower intraoperative transfusion rate (RR = 0.624, P = .021), lower permanent stoma rate (RR = 0.499, P = .000), lower overall stoma rate (RR = 0.520,P = .000), shorter hospital stay (SMD = -0.643, P = .014), and more lymph node dissections during surgery (SMD = 0.222, 95% CI: 0.021-0.423, P = .031), as well as a higher primary anastomosis rate (RR = 0.472, 95% CI: 0.286-0.7 77, P = .003), among other advantages. However, the SEMS group had a higher overall tumor recurrence rate (RR = 1.339, P = .048). SEMS has significant advantages over er in relieving clinical symptoms and facilitating postoperative recovery in MLCO, but does not reduce the tumor recurrence rate. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with SEMS may provide a new approach to the treatment of MLCO.

A Japanese Prospective, Multicenter Study of Colonic Stenting for Palliation Using a High Axial Force Self-Expandable Metal Stent for Malignant Large Bowel Obstruction in 200 Patients.

Evidence of the efficacy and safety of colorectal stent placement for palliation remains insufficient. This single-arm, prospective, multicenter study with a WallFlex enteral colonic stent included 200 consecutive patients with malignant large bowl obstruction in the palliation cohort. The technical and clinical success, as well as stent patency and complications as short-term (≤7 days) and long-term (>7 days) outcomes, of high axial force self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement was evaluated. The technical and clinical success rates were 98.5% and 94.5%, respectively. Non-recurrent colorectal obstruction at 1 year was 63.9%, and 71.2% of the patients remained free of recurrent colorectal obstruction until death or the last follow-up. Fifty-six patients (28.0%) received chemotherapy, and five patients were administered bevacizumab after stent placement. The overall complication rate was 47%, including four (2.0%) early-onset and ten (5.0%) late-onset perforations, mostly due to stent-edge injury. Only the use of a long SEMS was a risk factor for perforation. In conclusion, endoscopic colorectal stenting using high axial force SEMS is an effective and safe procedure for palliation in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction. However, care should be taken to avoid perforation at the stent edge when using a long SEMS.

Acute malignant colorectal obstruction (K56.6; C18, C19, C20), adults

.

A South African central hospital's experience with malignant colorectal obstruction.

The spectrum and outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) presenting with obstruction is not well studied in low- to middle-income countries (LMIC) and could have implications for health policy. This study aimed to address this deficit in an LMIC setting. A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with large bowel obstruction, during the period 2000-2019 from the prospective Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital (IALCH) CRC registry data. Data analysed included the site of CRC, tumour differentiation, management of patients with obstructive CRC, resection margins post resection, oncological management and reasons for failure to receive oncological therapy. Patient follow-up and recurrence were recorded. Malignant obstruction from CRC occurred in 510 patients (20% of the CRC registry). Median age at presentation was 57 years (IQR 48-67). One hundred and seventy-six (34.5%) and 135 (26.5%) had stage III and IV disease respectively. Moderately differentiated cancer was seen in 335 (65.6%). Management was resection (370; 72.5%), diverting colostomy (123; 24.1%) and stent insertion (55; 10.8%). Twenty-one patients (5.7%) had positive resection margins. Recurrence occurred in 34 patients (6.7%), all of whom had initially undergone resection, giving a recurrence rate of 9.8% in those receiving surgery. Median disease-free interval for patients developing recurrence was 21 months (IQR 12-32). One in five patients with CRC presented with obstruction. These patients were younger than in high incomecountry (HIC) series. Over 70% underwent resection. Stomas were used twice as frequently as stents to relieve the obstruction, a finding that is the reverse of that in HICs.

A Case of Immediate Anastomotic Leakage After Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer.

A man in his seventies was referred to our hospital for radical therapy for advanced rectal cancer with multiple liver metastases. A colonic stent had already been placed in his rectum at the previous hospital because of malignant colorectal obstruction, so our therapeutic strategy was to perform systematic chemotherapy after resection of the primary tumor. Laparoscopic low anterior resection with a covering stoma was performed under general anesthesia. At about one hour after the surgery, the patient had sudden abdominal pain with watery diarrhea, and a similar discharge from his drainage tube. We suspected peritonitis caused by bowel perforation and emergency surgery was performed. The operative findings showed that his peritonitis was caused by anastomotic leakage from the rectum. Radical lavage of the abdominal space and reconstruction of colostomy was performed. The patient gradually recovered and we were able to start systematic chemotherapy at one month after the surgery. Anastomotic leakage immediately after anterior resection caused by watery diarrhea is rare, and it may be concerned with several issues. The covering stoma is intended to stop anastomotic leakage but it cannot prevent all cases of leakage especially when obstruction is present. We recommend that preventive measures be taken against anastomotic leakage, including intraoperative leakage tests or anal decompression tube placement.

Colorectal self-expanding metal stent insertion using a small-caliber tapered transparent hood and electrolyte-free gel.

Colorectal self-expanding metal stent insertion is a useful procedure to treat acute colorectal obstruction caused by advanced colorectal cancer; however, guidewire perforation has been reported to occur as a result of inadequate endoscopic visibility [1] [2]. It is therefore important to maintain endoscopic visibility of the stricture to allow safe insertion of the colorectal stent. A method to maintain endoscopic visibility using an electrolyte-free gel (Viscoclear; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory) has recently been reported [3] [4]; however, it is difficult to maintain proper endoscopic visibility when the endoscopic hood has a large volume, as in the case of a conventional transparent hood. We previously reported a technique to obtain an appropriate field of view under saline immersion conditions using a calibrated, small-caliber tip, transparent hood (CAST hood; TOP, Tokyo, Japan) that has a tapered tip ([Fig. 1]) [5]. Herein, we report the use of a novel technique for colorectal stent insertion using this small-caliber tapered transparent hood and electrolyte-free gel ([Video 1]).

Management of left-sided malignant colorectal obstructions with curative intent: a network meta-analysis.

Several management options exist for colonic decompression in the setting of malignant large bowel obstruction, including oncologic resection, surgical diversion, and SEMS as a bridge-to-surgery. Consensus has yet to be reached on optimal treatment pathways. The aim of the present study was to perform a network meta-analysis comparing short-term postoperative morbidity and long-term oncologic outcomes between oncologic resection, surgical diversion, and self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) in left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction with curative intent. Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL were systematically searched. Articles were included if they compared two or more of the following in patients presenting with curative left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction: (1) emergent oncologic resection; (2) surgical diversion; and/or (3) SEMS. The primary outcome was overall 90-day postoperative morbidity. Pairwise meta-analyses were performed with inverse variance random effects. Random-effect Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. From 1277 citations, 53 studies with 9493 patients undergoing urgent oncologic resection, 1273 patients undergoing surgical diversion, and 2548 patients undergoing SEMS were included. Network meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in 90-day postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing SEMS compared to urgent oncologic resection (OR0.34, 95%CrI0.01-0.98). Insufficient RCT data pertaining to overall survival (OS) precluded network meta-analysis. Pairwise meta-analysis demonstrated decreased five-year OS for patients undergoing urgent oncologic resection compared to surgical diversion (OR0.44, 95%CI0.28-0.71, p < 0.01). Bridge-to-surgery interventions may offer short- and long-term benefits compared to urgent oncologic resection for malignant colorectal obstruction and should be increasingly considered in this patient population. Further prospective study comparing surgical diversion and SEMS is needed.

Fluoroscopic Stent Placement as a Bridge to Surgery for Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.

To assess the outcomes of single-stage surgery following fluoroscopic stent placement for malignant colorectal obstruction. This retrospective study included 46 patients (28 male and 18 female; mean age, 67.2 years) who had undergone fluoroscopic stent placement followed by laparoscopic resection (n = 31) or open surgery (n = 15) for malignant colorectal obstruction. The surgical outcomes were analyzed and compared. After a mean follow-up of 38.9 months, the recurrence-free and overall survival were estimated, and prognostic factors were evaluated. The mean interval between stent placement and surgery was 10.2 days. Primary anastomosis was possible in all patients. The mean postoperative length of hospitalization was 11.0 days. Bowel perforation was detected in six patients (13.0%). During the follow-up, ten patients (21.7%) developed recurrence; these included five of the six patients with bowel perforation. Bowel perforation had a significant effect on recurrence-free survival (p = 0.010). Single-stage surgery following fluoroscopic stent placement may be effective for treating malignant colorectal obstruction. Stent-related bowel perforation is a significant predictive factor for tumor recurrence.

Retracted: Self-Expandable Metal Stent as a Bridge to Surgery for Left-Sided Acute Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: Optimal Timing for Elective Surgery.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2022/6015729.].

Relationship Between C-reactive Protein-to-albumin Ratio Before and After Bowel Decompression and Prognosis in Acute Malignant Large Bowel Obstruction.

We investigated the relationship between prognosis and the necessity of decompression of large bowel obstruction (LBO) among patients with colorectal cancer admitted to the hospital in an emergency, as well as the correlation between prognosis and improvement in the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) after decompression. Seventy-four patients admitted to the hospital between 2013 and 2021 in an emergency due to LBO were included. We examined perioperative clinicopathological factors, bowel decompression type, and prognosis. Of the 74 patients, 24 (32.4%) required bowel decompression. A higher percentage of patients who required bowel decompression had a colorectal obstruction scoring system (CROSS) score 0 (p<0.001) with higher frequency of nutritional disorders (p=0.063) than that in no bowel decompression-requiring patients. The 3-year-disease-free survival was 70.8% in the no decompression-requiring group and 26.9% in the bowel decompression group (p=0.007), while the 3-year-overall survival was 90.8% and 76.5%, respectively (p=0.001). The 3-year-disease-free survival was 49.2% in the improved CAR group and 0.0% in the non-improved CAR group (p=0.024), while the 3-year-overall survival was 91.7% and 56.3%, respectively (p=0.061). The necessity of emergency decompression was associated with a poorer prognosis, compared to the no decompression-requiring group. Similarly, a CROSS score of 0 was an independent poor prognostic factor. Among patients who required emergency bowel decompression, those who showed improvement in CAR before and after decompression treatment had a better prognosis than those who did not.

Effect of intestinal obstruction stent combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the pathological characteristics of surgical specimens in patients with complete obstructive colorectal cancer

Effect of intestinal obstruction stent combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the pathological characteristics of surgical specimens in patients with complete obstructive colorectal cancer

Short-term effect of different time interval between self-expanding metallic stent and surgery for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction

BackgroundThe optimal time interval between self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) placement and surgery in patients with left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction (LMCO) remains controversial. Intestinal obstruction and SEMS placement would lead to intestinal edema, local tumor infiltration, and fibrosis, which may have a certain impact on elective surgery. Although prolong time interval would reduce relative complications, the risk of tumor progression must be taken into account. Therefore, our study proposes whether there is a difference in short-term postoperative complication outcomes between waiting for an interval of ≤4weeks compared with an extended interval for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.MethodsAll patients who underwent SEMS placement as BTS treatment for LMCO between January 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively identified. The primary outcomes of this study were short-term clinical postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grading ≥II).ResultsOf the 148 patients, 70.27% of patients underwent surgery ≤4 weeks of SEMS placement (Group 1) while 29.73% of patients underwent surgery &amp;gt;4 weeks of SEMS placement (Group 2). After SEMS placement, the patients in Group 2 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and then elective surgery. Significant differences were observed between both groups (Group 2 vs Group 1) for postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grading ≥II, 2.3% vs 14.4%, p=0.040), postoperative bowel function time (p&amp;lt;0.001), postoperative hospital stay (p=0.028) and total hospital stay (p=0.002).ConclusionsA bridging interval of &amp;gt;4 weeks between SEMS placement and surgery for LMCO has better short-term clinical outcome.

Clinical outcomes of palliative self-expandable metal stent placement in right- and left-sided malignant colon obstruction: A Honam Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (HASID) multicenter study.

Self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement is commonly used for palliation of left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction (MCO). However, right-sided MCO is usually treated surgically. Recent studies that compared palliative SEMS insertion and emergency surgery in right-sided MCOs have reported conflicting results. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of palliative SEMS placement in left-sided MCOs and right-sided MCOs and to investigate the predictive factors for clinical success and risk factors for complications.Data from 469 patients who underwent palliative SEMS placement for MCO at 6 hospitals in the Honam province of South Korea between 2009 and 2018 were reviewed. Among them, 69 patients with right-sided MCO and 400 patients with left-sided MCO who underwent SEMS placement for palliative purposes were enrolled. Clinical success, overall survival, complications, and predictive factors for clinical success and risk factors for complications were included as the main outcome measures.The clinical success rates were 97.1% (65/67) in right-sided MCO patients and 88.2% (353/400) in left-sided MCO patients. Complications including stent migration, tumor ingrowth, outgrowth, perforation, bacteremia/fever, and bleeding occurred in 10.1% (7/69) of right-sided MCO patients and 19.9% (79/400) of left-sided MCO patients. The mean overall survival of right-sided MCO was 28.02 months and 18.23 months for left-sided MCO. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, T3 stage tumors and the use of uncovered stents were significant factors for the clinical success of SEMS. The use of covered stents and performance status score of 0 to 2 were independent significant risk factors for complications.Palliative SEMS placement in right-sided MCO showed better clinical success rates than left-sided MCO. The use of uncovered stents is recommended for higher clinical success rates and lower complication rates.

Self-Expandable Metal Stent as a Bridge to Surgery for Left-Sided Acute Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: Optimal Timing for Elective Surgery.

Objectives This randomized, single-center, retrospective, comparative cohort study is aimed at investigating the optimal time interval from self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement to surgery and potential risk factors for complications in patients with acute malignant colorectal obstruction. Methods A total of 64 patients with left-sided acute malignant colorectal obstruction treated with SEMS placement and subsequent surgery between January 2013 and September 2020 were enrolled and allocated to a case group (SEMS placing time ≤ 14 days; n = 19 patients) and a control group (SEMS placing time > 14 days; n = 45 patients). The primary outcome was the difference in baseline information, patients' conditions during surgery, and postoperative conditions between the two groups. The secondary outcome included potential risk factors of postoperative complications. The propensity score matching (PSM) and super learner (SL) methods were used to eliminate multiple confounding factors of baseline data. A cohort of 21 samples was used for external validation, comprising 6 cases and 15 controls. Results A significant difference was observed between the two groups in intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.009), postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.002), postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grading ≥ II) (P < 0.001), stoma creation (P < 0.001), and primary anastomosis (P < 0.001). After a 1 : 3 PSM analysis, no statistically significant differences between eight confounding variables of the two groups were observed (P > 0.05). Caliper set as 0.2 multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the potential risk factor for postoperative complications was SEMS placing time (RR = 0.109, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.028-0.433; P = 0.002), indicating that SEMS placing time > 14 days was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in bridge-to-surgery (BTS) setting. The area under the AUC curve was 76.7% and validated using the validation cohort. Conclusions Long duration of SEMS placement (>14 days) may not influence surgical difficulty but could increase the risk of postoperative complications.

Safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a surgical bridge for acute left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction: a retrospective study

BackgroundFor colorectal cancer, preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy is more effective than postoperative chemotherapy because it not only eradicates micrometastases more effectively but also reduces the risk of incomplete intraoperative resection and tumor cell shedding. For the treatment of acute left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction, colorectal stents as well as stoma are being used to relieve the obstructive colorectal cancer, and as a bridge to surgery, allowing easy mobilization and resection of the colon. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with decompressing stoma (DS) can be used as a bridge to elective surgery (BTS) as an alternative to emergency surgery in patients with acute left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction, but its benefit is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a bridge to surgery in the treatment of acute left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction.MethodsData from patients who were admitted with acute left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction between January 2012 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed, and patients with gastrointestinal perforation or peritonitis were excluded. We performed one-to-two propensity score matching to compare the stoma requirement, postoperative complications, and other short-term oncological outcomes between the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and surgery group.ResultsThere were no differences in intraoperative blood loss, operative time, one-year postoperative mortality, and postoperative tumor markers between the two groups. The 1-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and surgery group were 96.8 and 91.3% (p = 0.562). The neoadjuvant chemotherapy group was able to reduce stoma rate 1 year after surgery (p = 0.047). Besides, the neoadjuvant group significantly reduced postoperative bowel function time (p < 0.001), postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.001), total hospital stay (p = 0.002), postoperative complications (p = 0.017), reduction in need to stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) (p = 0.042).ConclusionsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy as a bridge to elective surgery in patients with acute left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction is safe and has many advantages. Prospective multicenter studies with large samples are needed to further evaluate the feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.