Colorectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Research Articles

Different lymph node staging systems for predicting the prognosis of colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a rare malignancy that primarily arises from the diffuse distribution of neuroendocrine cells in the colon and rectum. Previous studies have pointed out that the status of lymph node may be used to predict the prognosis. To investigate the predictive values of lymph node ratio (LNR), positive lymph node (PLN), and log odds of PLNs (LODDS) staging systems on the prognosis of colorectal NENs treated surgically, and compare their predictive values. This cohort study included 895 patients with colorectal NENs treated surgically from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The endpoint was mortality of patients with colorectal NENs treated surgically. X-tile software was utilized to identify most suitable thresholds for categorizing the LNR, PLN, and LODDS. Participants were selected in a random manner to form training and testing sets. The prognosis of surgically treating colorectal NENs was examined using multivariate cox analysis to assess the associations of LNR, PLN, and LODDS with the prognosis of colorectal NENs. C-index was used for assessing the predictive effectiveness. We conducted a subgroup analysis to explore the different lymph node staging systems' predictive values. After adjusting all confounding factors, PLN, LNR and LODDS staging systems were linked with mortality in patients with colorectal NENs treated surgically (P < 0.05). We found that LODDS staging had a higher prognostic value for patients with colorectal NENs treated surgically than PLN and LNR staging systems. Similar results were obtained in the different G staging subgroup analyses. Furthermore, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for LODDS staging system remained consistently higher than those of PLN or LNR, even at the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5- and 6-year follow-up periods. LNR, PLN, and LODDS were found to significantly predict the prognosis of patients with colorectal NENs treated surgically.

Evaluation of association between center colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm volume and survival among patients with colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Although correlation between center volume and survival has been reported for several complex cancers, it remains unknown if this is true for colorectal neuroendocrine carcinomas (CRNECs). We hypothesized that higher center annual volume of colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm resections would be associated with overall survival (OS) for patients with CRNECs. Patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with stages I-III CRNEC between 2006 and 2018 and who underwent surgical resection were identified. The mean annual colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm resection volume threshold associated with significantly worse mortality hazard was determined using restricted cubic splines. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to compare OS, while Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariable analysis. There were 694 patients with CRNEC who met inclusion criteria across 1229 centers. Based on the cubic spline, centers treating fewer than one colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm patient every 3 years on average had worse outcomes. Centers below this threshold were classified as low-volume (LV) centers corresponding with 42% of centers and about 15% of the patient cohort. In unadjusted survival analysis, LV patients had a median OS of 14 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10-19) while those treated at HV centers had a median OS of 33 months (95% CI: 25-49). In multivariable analysis, resection at a LV center was associated with increased risk of mortality (1.42 [95% CI: 1.01-2.00], p = 0.04). CRNEC patients have a dire prognosis; however, treatment at an HV center may be associated with decreased risk of mortality.

Comparing surgical and endoscopic resection approaches for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors within the diameter range of 10-20mm: an inverse probability weighting analysis based on the SEER database.

Currently, the primary treatment modalities for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (CRNET) with a diameter between 10mm and 20mm are surgical resection (SR) and endoscopic resection (ER). However, it remains unclear which surgical approach yields the greatest survival benefit for patients. This study included data from patients diagnosed with CRNET with tumor diameters ranging from 10mm to 20mm between the years 2004 and 2019, obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were categorized into ER and SR groups based on the respective surgical approaches. Inverse probability weighting (IPTW) was employed to mitigate selection bias. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were utilized to estimate overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox regression analysis (univariate and multivariate) was performed to evaluate potential factors influencing survival. A total of 292 CRNET patients were included in this study (ER group: 108 individuals, SR group: 184 individuals). Prior to IPTW adjustment, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis demonstrated that the OS and CSS of the SR group were inferior to those of the ER group. However, after IPTW adjustment, no statistically significant differences in prognosis were observed between the two groups. Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with muscular invasion, positive lymph nodes, or distant metastasis derived greater survival benefits from SR. Significant differences in OS and CSS between the two groups were also observed across different age groups. For patients with mucosal-limited lesions and without local lymph node or distant metastasis, ER is the preferred surgical approach. However, for patients with muscular invasion or positive lymph nodes/distant metastasis, SR offers a better prognosis. The choice of surgical approach should be based on the specific clinical characteristics of patients within different subgroups.

Palliative primary tumor resection may not offer survival benefits for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms, one multicenter retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe efficacy of palliative primary tumor resection (PTR) in improving prognosis for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has not been fully explored.MethodsWe performed one retrospective cohort study and recruited 68 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal NENs from two Chinese medical centers between 2000 and 2022. All patients were assigned to PTR group and no PTR group. The clinicopathological manifestation data were carefully collected, and the survival outcomes were compared between the two groups using Kaplan–Meier methods. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to minimize confounding bias. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.ResultsA total of 32 patients received PTR, and the other 36 patients did not. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were 4 and 22 months in the whole cohort, respectively. For patients who received no PTR, the median OS was 16 months, and the 1-year OS rate and 3-year OS rate were 56.4% and 39.6%, respectively. For patients who received PTR, the median OS was 24 months, and the 1-year OS rate and 3-year OS rate were 67.9% and 34.1%, respectively. However, the Kaplan–Meier survival curves and log-rank test demonstrated no significant survival difference between the two groups (P = 0.963). Moreover, palliative PTR was also not confirmed as a prognostic factor in subsequent univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses in both the original and matched cohorts. Only histological differentiation was identified as an independent prognostic factor affecting PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02–3.41, P = 0.043] and OS [HR = 3.70, 95% CI: 1.09–12.48, P = 0.035] in the original cohort.ConclusionsPalliative PTR may not offer survival benefits for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal NENs.

Short-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors: Japanese multicenter prospective C-NET STUDY.

The incidence of colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has increased with colorectal cancer screening programs and increased colonoscopies. The management of colorectal NETs has recently shifted from radical surgery to endoscopic resection. We aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of various methods of endoscopic resection for colorectal NETs. Among those registered in the C-NET STUDY, patients with colorectal NETs who underwent endoscopic treatment as the initial therapy were included. Short-term outcomes, such as the en bloc resection rate and R0 resection (en bloc resection with tumor-free margin) rate, were analyzed based on treatment modalities. A total of 472 patients with 477 colorectal NETs received endoscopic treatment. Of these, 418 patients with 421 lesions who met the eligibility criteria were included in the analysis. The median age of the patients was 55 years, and 56.9% of them were men. The lower rectum was the most commonly affected site (88.6%), and lesions <10 mm accounted for 87% of the cases. Endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L, 56.5%) was the most common method, followed by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD, 31.4%) and endoscopic mucosal resection using a cap (EMR-C, 8.5%). R0 resection rates <10 mm were 95.5%, 94.8%, and 94.3% for ESMR-L, ESD, and EMR-C, respectively. All 16 (3.8%) patients who developed treatment-related complications could be treated conservatively. Overall, 23 (5.5%) patients had incomplete resection without independent clinicopathological risk factors. ESMR-L, ESD, and EMR-C were equally effective and safe for colorectal NETs with a diameter <10 mm.

Analysis of the Genetic Characteristics and Metastatic Pathways of G1 and G2 Colorectal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

G1 and G2 colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of rare and indolent diseases. We aimed to delineate their genetic characteristics and explore their metastatic mechanisms. We used next-generation sequencing technology for targeted sequencing for 54 patients with G1 and G2 colorectal NENs. We delineated their genetic features and compared the genetic characteristics between metastatic NENs and nonmetastatic NENs. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis was utilized to explore their abnormal pathways and study their potential metastatic mechanisms. We collected 23 metastatic NENs and 31 nonmetastatic NENs. In the whole cohort, the common mutated genes were NCOR2, BRD4, MDC1, ARID1A, AXIN2, etc. The common copy number variations (CNVs) included amplification of HIST1H3D, amplification of HIST1H3E, and loss of PTEN. The KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that PI3K-Akt, MAPK, and Rap1 were the major abnormal pathways. There were significantly different genetic features between metastatic NENs and nonmetastatic NENs. The metastatic NENs shared only 47 (22.5%) mutated genes and 6 (13.3%) CNVs with nonmetastatic NENs. NCOR2, BRD4, CDKN1B, CYP3A5, and EIF1AX were the commonly mutated genes in metastatic NENs, while NCOR2, MDC1, AXIN2, PIK3C2G, and PTPRT were the commonly mutated genes in nonmetastatic NENs. Metastatic NENs presented a significantly higher proportion of abnormal pathways of cell senescence (56.5% vs 25.8%, P = .022) and lysine degradation (43.5% vs 16.1%, P = .027) than nonmetastatic NENs. G1 and G2 colorectal NENs are a group of heterogeneous diseases that might obtain an increased invasive ability through aberrant cell senescence and lysine degradation pathways.

Demographic characteristics and survival in young onset colorectal neuroendocrine tumors

Demographic characteristics and survival in young onset colorectal neuroendocrine tumors

Claudin 18.2 expression in digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: a clinicopathological study.

Claudin 18.2-targeted therapy has shown significant efficacy in treating claudin 18.2-positive cancers. However, limited systematic studies have investigated characteristics of claudin 18.2 expression in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Data and specimens from 403 cases of digestive NENs were retrospectively collected, and claudin 18.2 expression was detected using immunochemical staining. Claudin 18.2 was positive in 19.6% (79/403) of the digestive NENs. The highest positive rate of claudin 18.2 was observed in gastric NENs (72/259, 27.8%), accounting for 91.1% (72/79) of all positive cases. The positivity rate was significantly higher in gastric NENs compared to pancreatic (2/78, 2.6%) or colorectal NENs (2/38, 5.3%; p < 0.05). For digestive NENs, claudin 18.2 positivity was significantly higher in neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) (37/144, 25.7%) than in neuroendocrine tumours (NETs; 14/160, 8.8%; p < 0.001), but no significant difference was found between gastric NECs (59/213, 27.7%) and gastric NETs (13/46, 28.3%; p > 0.05). The positivity was significantly higher in large-cell NECs (LCNECs; 28/79, 35.4%) and MiNEN (mixed neuroendocrine-non- neuroendocrine neoplasms)-LCNECs (23/66, 34.8%) compared to small-cell NECs (SCNECs; 9/65, 13.8%) and MiNEN-SCNECs (5/33, 15.2%; p < 0.05). Claudin 18.2 expression was more prevalent in gastric NENs than in pancreatic (12.5 ×; p = 0.001) and colorectal NENs (5.9 ×; p = 0.021). Claudin 18.2 staining was a useful method for identify the gastric origins of NETs, with a sensitivity of 28.3% and a specificity of 99.1%. The expression characteristics of claudin 18.2 in NENs were characterized, which may provide a clinicopathological reference for targeted therapies in patients with NENs.

Treatment strategy and post-treatment management of colorectal neuroendocrine tumor.

Following the increase in colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), there is a consequent increase in the importance of their appropriate treatment and post-treatment management. It is widely accepted that colorectal NETs sized ≥20mm and those with muscularis propria invasion are indicated for radical surgery, and those sized <10mm without the invasion are indicated for local resection. No consensus has been reached regarding the treatment strategy for those sized 10-19mm without the invasion. Endoscopic resection has become a primary option for the local resection of colorectal NETs. For rectal NETs sized <10mm, modified endoscopic mucosal resection, such as endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation device and endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope, seems favorable because of its ability to achieve a high R0 resection rate, safety, and convenience. Endoscopic submucosal dissection can also be helpful for these lesions; however, this procedure may be more effective for large lesions or those in the colon. Management following local resection of colorectal NETs is based on the pathological evaluation of factors associated with metastasis, including tumor size, invasion depth, tumor cell proliferative activity (NET grading), presence of lymphovascular invasion, and resection margins. There remain unclear issues in managing cases with NET grading ≥2, positive lymphovascular invasion, and positive resection margins following local resection. In particular, there is confusion regarding managing positive lymphovascular invasion because positivity has become remarkably high with the increased use of the immunohistochemical/special staining. Further evidence based on long-term clinical outcomes is required to address these issues.

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for colorectal neuroendocrine tumours.

This ENETS guidance paper, developed by a multidisciplinary working group, provides an update on the previous colorectal guidance paper in a different format. Guided by key clinical questions practical advice on the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumours (NET) of the caecum, colon, and rectum is provided. Although covered in one guidance paper colorectal NET comprises a heterogeneous group of neoplasms. The most common rectal NET are often small G1 tumours that can be treated by adequate endoscopic resection techniques. Evidence from prospective clinical trials on the treatment of metastatic colorectal NET is limited and discussion of patients in experienced multidisciplinary tumour boards strongly recommended. Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) are discussed in a separate guidance paper.

Risk prediction of second primary malignancies in primary colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms patients: a population-based study.

In this study, we aimed to identify risk factors for developing second primary malignancies (SPMs) in colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) patients and develop a competing-risk nomogram to predict SPMs' probabilities quantitatively. Patients with colorectal NENs were retrospectively collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 2000-2013. Potential risk factors for SPMs' occurrence in colorectal NENs' patients were identified by the Fine and Gray's proportional sub-distribution hazards model. Then, a competing-risk nomogram was constructed to quantify SPMs' probabilities. The discriminative abilities and calibrations of this competing-risk nomogram were assessed by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) and calibration curves. We identified 11,017 colorectal NENs' patients, and randomly divided them into training (n = 7711 patients) and validation (n = 3306 patients) cohorts. In the whole cohort, 12.4% patients (n = 1369) had developed SPMs during the maximum follow-up of approximately 19years (median 8.9years). Sex, age, race, primary tumor location, and chemotherapy were identified as risk factors for SPMs' occurrence in colorectal NENs' patients. Such factors were selected to develop a competing-risk nomogram and showed excellent predictive ability for SPMs' occurrence (the 3-, 5-, and 10-year AUC values were 0.631, 0.632, and 0.629 in the training cohort and 0.665, 0.639, 0.624 in the validation cohort, respectively). This research identified risk factors for SPMs' occurrence in colorectal NENs' patients. Competing-risk nomogram was constructed and proved to have good performance.

Development of novel prediction models for nodal and distant metastasis in G1 and G2 colorectal neuroendocrine tumors

We aimed to construct novel nomograms for nodal and distant metastasis for patients with G1 and G2 colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). A training set and validation set were obtained by including G1 and G2 colorectal NET patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and the Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Science, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) values under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and the Hosmer‒Lemeshow tests were used to evaluate the discriminability and calibration of nomograms. In total, 3690 and 172 patients were included in the training set and validation set, respectively. Tumor size, location, and T stage were included in the nomogram predicting nodal metastasis. The AUC values of the nomogram were 0.972 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.964-0.980) and 0.897 (95% CI: 0.846-0.948) in the training set and validation set, respectively. The calibration plots and Hosmer‒Lemeshow test for the training set (P = 0.999) and validation set (P = 0.537) showed good model calibration. Tumor size, T stage, and N stage were incorporated into the nomogram predicting distant metastasis. The ROC curves demonstrated desirable discrimination both in the training set (AUC = 0.938 (95% CI: 0.921-0.954)) and validation set (AUC = 0.938 (95% CI: 0.890-0.988)). The calibration curves and Hosmer‒Lemeshow test indicated acceptable model calibration both in the training set (P = 0.908) and validation set (P = 0.722). The proposed nomograms may be used as a reliable tool to predict the nodal and distant metastasis in G1 and G2 colorectal NETs.

Epidemiological trends and novel prognostic evaluation approaches of patients with stage II-IV colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: A population-based study with external validation.

This study aimed to clarify the incidence trend of all-stage colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (CRNENs), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) of patients with stage II-IV CRNENs, and to establish relevant nomograms for risk stratification. Among all patients diagnosed with CRNENs in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1975 to 2019, temporal trends in incidence were assessed. Clinical data of 668 patients with stage II-IV CRNENs from 2010 to 2016 were extracted for survival analysis. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort at a ratio of 7:3. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses were utilized to identify independent prognostic factors affecting OS outcomes. Competing risk analysis was applied to investigate risk factors related to the DSS of CRNENs. Two nomograms specifically for OS and DSS were developed for patients with stage II-IV CRNENs, their prognostic capabilities were evaluated using calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), and decision-curve analysis (DCA). Our hospital's independent cohort of 62 patients with CRNENs was used as the external validation cohort. In the period of 1975-2019, the incidence of CRNENs increased steadily with an annual percentage change (APC) of 4.50 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.90-5.11, P < 0.05). In total, 668 patients with stage II-IV CRNENs were included in the survival analysis from 2010 and 2016. Independent adverse prognostic factors for both OS and DSS of CRNENs prior treatment included grade III/IV (HR for OS: 4.66, 95%CI: 2.92-7.42; HR for DSS: 4.79, 95%CI: 4.27-5.31), higher TNM stage ([stage III vs stage II] HR for OS: 2.22, 95%CI: 1.25-3.94; HR for DSS: 2.69, 95%CI: 1.96-3.42. [stage IV vs stage II] HR for OS: 3.99, 95%CI: 2.03-7.83; HR for DSS: 4.96, 95%CI: 4.14-5.78), liver metastasis (HR for OS: 1.61, 95%CI: 1.03-2.51; HR for DSS: 1.86, 95%CI: 1.39-2.32), and brain metastasis (HR for OS: 4.57, 95%CI: 1.66-12.58; HR for DSS: 5.01, 95%CI: 4.15-5.87). Advanced age was also identified as a risk factor for OS (HR: 2.03, 95%CI: 1.5-2.76) but not DSS. In terms of treatment, surgery can significantly prolong OS (HR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.44-0.86) and DSS (HR: 0.67, 95%CI: 0.29-1.05), but chemotherapy and radiation failed to show significance. The respective nomograms for OS and DSS for stage II-IV CRNENs demonstrated high accuracy and robust prediction value in predicting 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS and DSS outcomes in training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts. Besides, two online tools regarding OS and DSS prediction were established, facilitating nomogram score calculation, risk group determination, as well as survival prediction for each individual patient. Over the past 40 years, the incidence of CRNENs presented increased steadily, along with improved survival outcomes. Grade III-IV, higher TNM stage, liver metastasis, brain metastasis, and without receiving surgery were found to be associated with worse OS and DSS. Advanced age was a risk factor for OS but not DSS. Nomograms for patients with stage II-IV stage CRNENs are capable of predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and DSS rates with high accuracy, and realize risk stratification.

Comparison of Metastatic Patterns Among Neuroendocrine Tumors, Neuroendocrine Carcinomas, and Nonneuroendocrine Carcinomas of Various Primary Organs.

Both neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) exhibit neuroendocrine differentiation and are classified as neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). NECs and nonneuroendocrine neoplasms (non-NENs), such as adenocarcinoma, have similar mutational profiles. The purpose of this study was to identify differences in metastatic patterns and to identify the key factor causing these differences by simultaneously comparing the metastatic patterns of NETs, NECs and non-NENs from various primary organs. We retrieved data for 4,223 patients with NENs and 41,637 patients with non-NENs arising at various primary sites from an institutional database and then compared NET, NEC, and non-NEN metastatic patterns. NETs and NECs showed generally similar metastatic patterns. Most NEN patients had a higher liver organotrophic metastasis rate, lower lung organotrophic metastasis rate, and lower pleural/peritoneal organotrophic metastasis rate than non-NEN patients. Some differences were characteristics of specific organs. Some of these site-specific differences were not caused by NENs but by non-NENs, including a higher bone organotrophic metastasis rate for medullary thyroid carcinoma and a lower bone organotrophic metastasis rate for pulmonary NEN. Other differences were probably caused by NENs, including a higher bone organotrophic metastasis rate for colorectal NETs. Uterine cervical NEC showed unique patterns of metastasis compared to NEN from other sites. Significant differences between the metastatic patterns of NENs and non-NENs were detected. The multigene program that causes neuroendocrine differentiation might be associated with organotropic metastasis.

Tumor Differentiation is the Dominant Prognostic Factor for Patients with Colorectal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Distant Metastasis.

Colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare tumors. The prognosis and prognostic factors of metastatic colorectal NENs have not been fully elucidated. We retrospectively enrolled 77 consecutive patients diagnosed with colorectal NENs with synchronous distant metastases between 2000 and 2021. All patients were assigned to the neuroendocrine tumor (NET) group or the neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) group based on histological differentiation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize confounding bias. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival rates. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. In total, 35 (45.5%) and 42 (54.5%) patients had well-differentiated NETs and poorly differentiated NECs, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 26 months for the entire cohort, and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates were 69.4%, 41.4%, and 27.8%, respectively. In the subgroup analysis, the median OS was 62 and 10 months for NETs and NECs, respectively. Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients with a primary tumor located in the colon, ulcerative tumors and poorly differentiated tumors were at higher risk for poorer progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. However, only histological differentiation was identified as an independent factor affecting OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 8.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.98-23.01, P < 0.001) in multivariate analysis. After PSM, histological differentiation was further confirmed as the dominant factor affecting OS (HR = 6.09, 95% CI: 1.96-18.95, P=0.002)). Histological differentiation was the most dominant prognostic factor in patients with metastatic colorectal NENs. Patients with well-differentiated NETs had a good chance of long-term survival.

Diagnostic performance and impact on patient management of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT in colorectal neuroendocrine tumors derived from hindgut.

The main purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the diagnostic performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-D-Phe1-Try3-octreotide(DOTA-TOC) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with well-differentiated colorectal Neuroendocrine Tumours (NETs) originating from the hindgut. The other aims were to assess the impact of the examination on patient management and to analyze the results of 2-[18F]FDG and/or 6-[18F]FDOPA PET/CT when they were performed. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT and clinical data from 30 patients with biopsy-proven well-differentiated NETs originating from the hindgut were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed by comparing the [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT findings with pathological and/or follow-up data. We also compared the [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT results with 2-[18F]FDG and/or 6-[18F]FDOPA PET/CT results in 6 patients. The impact on management was determined in hindsight by comparing the patient management decided before and after the TEP examination based on data from multidisciplinary team meetings. On a patient basis, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT was accurate in 30 of the 30 examinations. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT correctly identified the primary tumor in all patients with primary tumors not resected before the examination and allowed the detection of unexpected distant metastases in 36% of the patients referred for initial staging. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT findings affected patient management in 57% of cases with generally major intermodality changes. Intraindividual comparison of the results of the different PET radiopharmaceuticals showed a clear superiority of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT considering both the number of lesions and the intensity of uptake. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT is an accurate imaging modality for the assessment of well-differentiated colorectal NETs that highly impact patient management. Thus, we suggest that [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT be employed as a first choice for the assessment of these tumors in nuclear medicine.

S2061 Looks Aren't Everything: A Rare Case of Metastatic Colonic Neuroendocrine Tumor

Introduction: Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare, slow growing tumors with distinct histopathological characteristics. Endoscopically, they appear as sessile, flat polypoid lesions, making them difficult to distinguish from pathologically benign polyps. They can be found anywhere within the gastrointestinal tract with the terminal ileum being the most common location. Severity of disease varies based on size, macroscopic ulcerations, and hyperemia of mucosal surfaces. NETs of the colon and rectum are extremely rare and account for only 1% of all colorectal malignancies. Patients typically remain asymptomatic until the tumor is large enough to cause obstruction or abdominal pain and is diagnosed during routine colonoscopy. Case Description/Methods: We present a 63-year-old male with a past medical history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and parathyroidectomy, who on colonoscopy in 2019 had 3 benign-appearing polyps showing mixed hyperplastic and tubular adenoma morphology. Three years later, repeat colonoscopy revealed 5 sessile polyps of varying sizes from 2 mm to 6 mm, where all were completely resected. Pathology showed 4 tubular adenomas and a 2-millimeter low grade (WHO 2010 Grade 1) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor located in the sigmoid colon. The latter exhibited typical findings of NETs with a trabecular growth pattern, round nuclei, and a “salt and pepper” chromatin. Ki-67 proliferative index was 1%. Tumor cells were positive for synaptophysin, and chromogranin, and negative for CK7, CK20 and CDX2. PET scan demonstrated intensely DOTATATE avid mural thickening at the duodenal bulb and proximal second portion of the duodenum, along with uptake in liver, and pulmonary nodules, with osseous lesions suspicious for metastatic disease. Repeat colonoscopy 2 months later was unrevealing without evidence of neuroendocrine tumor (Figure 1). Discussion: Colorectal NETs are rapidly progressive with a poor prognosis compared to colorectal adenocarcinoma. Our case demonstrates that low grade, well differentiated NETs of the colon can undergo rapid high-grade transformation within a short interval between colonoscopies. When considering NETs without known metastatic disease, lesions that are amenable to endoscopic resection may be treated with endoscopic intervention and surveillance alone. Given rapid progression of disease and predilection for metastasis, our case highlights the need for early detection of NETs with interval screening colonoscopies to decrease morbidity and mortality.Figure 1.: Image A: 3 mm polyp located in the sigmoid colon. Appears sessile and flat with no malignant appearing lesion. Image B: 2 polyps located in the transverse colon, 3 mm and 5 mm in size, which endoscopically appear similar to image A. Pathology is consistent with tubular adenoma.

Trends of colorectal cancer incidence according to age, anatomic site, and histological subgroup in Bavaria: A registry-based study.

BackgroundRecent studies reported an increase in colorectal cancer incidence for adults below 50 years. There is a lack of studies distinguishing between histological subgroups, especially from Europe.MethodsUsing data from the Bavarian Cancer Registry, we analyzed incidence trends in colorectal cancer by age (20–29, 30–39, 40–49, and 50 years and above), anatomic site (colon without appendix, appendix, and rectum), and histological subgroup (adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine neoplasm) from 2005 to 2019. We calculated 3-year average annual age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) per 100,000 persons for the beginning (2005–2007) and the end (2017–2019) of the study period and estimated average annual percentage change.ResultsData from 137,469 persons diagnosed with colorectal cancer were included. From 139,420 cases in total, 109,825 (78.8%) were adenocarcinomas (ACs), 2,800 (2.0%) were neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), and 26,795 (19.2%) had other histologies. This analysis showed a significant increase in the 3-year average annual ASIR of colorectal NENs in all age groups between 2005–2007 and 2017–2019 with the highest increase in the age groups 30–39 years (0.47 to 1.53 cases per 100,000 persons; +226%; p < 0.05) and 20–29 years (0.52 to 1.38 cases per 100,000 persons; +165%; p < 0.05). The increase was driven by appendiceal and rectal NENs but not by colonic NENs. The 3-year average annual ASIR of colorectal ACs did not change significantly for the age groups below 50 years. For those aged 50 years and above, the 3-year average annual ASIR of colorectal ACs decreased significantly (132.55 to 105.95 cases per 100,000 persons; −20%; p < 0.05]). The proportion of NENs increased across all age groups, especially in the younger age groups.ConclusionFuture studies that analyze trends in early-onset colorectal cancer need to distinguish between anatomic sites as well as histological subgroups and may, thus, provide useful information regarding the organization of colorectal cancer screening, which primarily helps to detect adenomas and adenocarcinomas."

564 Late Presentation of Colorectal Neuroendocrine Neoplasia Is Associated with a Poor Prognosis

Abstract Introduction Although neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) arising from the colon and rectum are generally slow growing and present early, a minority demonstrate aggressive growth and present late with metastatic disease. The aim of this study is to analyse the clinical presentation, management and prognosis of patients presenting with advanced colorectal NENs. Method Data were collected from dedicated databases on patients with colorectal NENs who presented to our hospital between January 2015 and February 2021. Patients who presented with appendiceal NENs were excluded. Results 13 patients with colorectal NENs were identified, of whom 3 patients (23%) had advanced disease at diagnosis. These 3 patients, 2 males (78 and 82 years old) and 1 female (71 years old), presented with weight loss, anorexia and altered bowel habit, with one patient also having rectal bleeding. The site of the primary was in the rectum (2 patients) and in the sigmoid colon (1 patient), the histology being poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. All 3 patients had liver metastases at presentation, with 2 having lung and lymph node metastases as well. Due to their advanced disease, these patients’ treatment was carried out with palliative intent. All three patients passed away within a year of diagnosis. Conclusion Poorly differentiated colorectal NENs with distant metastases were associated with a poor prognosis. Management involves a multidisciplinary team. The use of somatostatin analogue therapy and palliative chemotherapy are options for symptom control.

Epidemiological, clinical and endoscopic characteristics of colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a population-based study in the Netherlands.

Background and study aims Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) account for a small number of colorectal neoplasms. Endoscopic detection is essential for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Little is known about incidence of NENs in colonoscopy populations or the relationship between clinical, endoscopic and histopathologic features. We evaluated epidemiology, endoscopic and clinical characteristics of colorectal NENs in a population-based cohort. Patients and methods Medical records of NEN cases were cross-linked with the national pathology database from January 2001 to December 2015, in South Limburg County, the Netherlands, covering four endoscopy units. Senior pathologists reviewed and classified NENs using World Health Organization 5th edition (2019) guidelines. Results The number of colorectal NEN diagnoses was stable over time with 0.6 NEN per 1,000 patients. A total of NENs were detected in 85 patients: 65 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and 20 poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Rectal NETs were usually small sessile/submucosal lesions with yellowish (lipoma-like) color. Colonic NETs were larger sessile/submucosal lesions with darker color compared to background. Colorectal NECs presented as large, dark-colored lesions with ulcerated/necrotizing areas. Conclusions Our population-based data point to a stable and low incidence of 0.6 NEN per 1,000 patients in the Netherlands. Rectal NETs mainly present as small sessile yellowish lesions. Colonic NETs present as larger and darker lesions than background mucosa and NECs as darker lesions than background with ulceration/necrosis. Standardized endoscopic characterization of colorectal NENs is necessary to improve recognition of these lesions and provide a basis for evidence-based treatment and surveillance recommendations.