Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Research Articles

Population health outcomes of blood-based screening for colorectal cancer in comparison to current screening modalities: insights from a discrete-event simulation model incorporating longitudinal adherence

ABSTRACT Aim Insufficient adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening impedes individual and population health benefits, with about one-third of individuals non-adherent to available screening options. The impact of poor adherence is inadequately considered in most health economics models, limiting the evaluation of real-world population-level screening outcomes. This study introduces the CAN-SCREEN (Colorectal cANcer SCReening Economics and adherENce) model, utilizing real-world adherence scenarios to assess the effectiveness of a blood-based test (BBT) compared to existing strategies. Materials and methods The CAN-SCREEN model evaluates various CRC screening strategies per 1,000 screened individuals for ages 45-75. Adherence is modeled in two ways: 1) full adherence and 2) longitudinally declining adherence. BBT performance is based on recent pivotal trial data, while existing strategies are informed using literature. The full adherence model is calibrated using previously published Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) models. Outcomes, including life-years gained (LYG), CRC cases averted, CRC deaths averted, and colonoscopies, are compared to no screening. Results Longitudinal adherence modeling reveals differences in the relative ordering of health outcomes and resource utilization, as measured by the number of colonoscopies performed per 1,000, between screening modalities. BBT outperforms fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and the multitarget stool DNA (mtsDNA) test with more CRC deaths averted (13) compared to FIT and mtsDNA (7, 11), more CRC cases averted (27 vs. 16, 22) and higher LYG (214 vs. 157, 199). BBT yields fewer CRC deaths averted compared to colonoscopy (13, 15) but requires fewer colonoscopies (1,053 vs. 1,928). Limitations Due to limited data, the CAN-SCREEN model with longitudinal adherence leverages evidence-informed assumptions for the natural history and real-world longitudinal adherence to screening. Conclusions The CAN-SCREEN model demonstrates that amongst non-invasive CRC screening strategies, those with higher adherence yield more favorable health outcomes as measured by CRC deaths averted, CRC cases averted, and LYG.

Real-world multi-target stool DNA longitudinal adherence for colorectal cancer re-screening in a large, national population.

e15633 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most diagnosed cancer, as well as the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States – with an estimated 152,810 diagnoses and 53,010 fatal cases in 2024. Regular screening and early detection can reduce CRC incidence and improve overall survival; however, recent national survey data (2021) demonstrate that only 59% of the US screen-eligible population (≥ age 45) is up to date. Home-based, non-invasive CRC screening test options, such as the multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, have the potential to improve patient outcomes and overcome CRC screening adherence barriers at multiple levels. Given that the recommended interval for mt-sDNA is three years, a better understanding of use in repeat users is warranted. We evaluated the effective rescreen rate of previous mt-sDNA test users. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients between the ages of 45 and 75 years who were shipped an mt-sDNA test kit between January 1st – December 31st, 2023, and had previously completed mt-sDNA screening with a negative result > 2.5 years prior. Our primary variable of interest was mt-sDNA completion rate on repeat testing, defined as kit receipt with a valid result within 120 days of the shipment date. Regression analysis was performed to determine baseline characteristics associated with repeat test completion rate. Results: During the analysis period, a total of 481,748 patients who met the inclusion criteria received an mt-sDNA kit. The majority of the cohort was female (61.4%) and between the ages of 65-75 years (50.9%). Overall repeat test completion rate was 83.6%, with the average time to kit return being 18.9 days. Completion rates were similar between males (83.8%) and females (83.6%), and patients receiving included navigation support via mobile phones demonstrated the shortest average time to kit return (18.7 days). Completion rates increased concordantly with patient age: 81.6%, (45-49 years), 82.2% (50-64 years), and 85% (65-75 years). For first-time rescreen participants (2nd lifetime mt-sDNA test), the completion rate was 83.1%. For second-time rescreen participants (3rd lifetime mt-sDNA test), the completion rate was even higher at 93.6%. Logistic regression analyses revealed that patients re-screening for a second-time were three times more likely to return the mt-sDNA kit for CRC screening (OR = 3.118; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Data from this large, retrospective cohort study revealed that repeat CRC screening with the mt-sDNA test is associated with high adherence to triennial follow-up among participants. suggesting a high-level of perceived patient confidence in repeat performance of the mt-sDNA test. These novel data provide relevant insights regarding strong patient willingness to continue with home-based, non-invasive mt-sDNA testing over multiple cycles of average-risk CRC screening.

Nativity Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Hispanics in the United States.

Hispanics in the United States (U.S.) have previously exhibited lower guideline-concordant colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake than non-Hispanic (NH) Whites, with disparities accentuated in foreign-born Hispanics, however it is unclear whether nativity-related CRC screening disparities have changed in the last two decades and whether these disparities are attenuated after adjusting for socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. We evaluated CRC screening adherence in foreign- and U.S.-born Hispanics compared to U.S.-born NH Whites. We used 2019 National Health Interview Survey data to compare the prevalence of up-to-date CRC screening per the 2019 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations among Hispanic nativity subgroups (i.e., foreign- and U.S.-born) and U.S.-born NH Whites using unadjusted and adjusted weighted log-linked binomial regression. Foreign- and U.S.-born Hispanics had a significantly lower unadjusted prevalence of up-to-date screening than U.S.-born NH Whites (47.18% and 64.18% versus 70.70%; p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0109, respectively). After adjusting for socioeconomic and demographic differences, the prevalence of up-to-date screening was lower in foreign-born Hispanics compared to U.S.-born NH Whites [adjusted prevalence ratio 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.70-0.91)]; however, no statistically significant difference was observed between U.S.-born Hispanics and NH Whites. Our results suggest a low screening uptake in foreign-born Hispanics independent of socioeconomic and demographic differences. Future interventions should target foreign-born Hispanics to address disparities and promote early detection and prevention of CRC regardless of socioeconomic factors.

Effectiveness of tailored talks between a cancer screening specialist and general practitioners to improve the uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Ancona (Italy) during the pandemic period

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake in many countries has been low and further impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. General Practitioners (GPs) are key facilitators, however research on their impact on organised CRC screening is still limited. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of tailored talks with GPs to increase population uptake of the long-established CRC screening programme in Ancona province, Italy. Methods In this prospective cohort study, one-to-one tailored talks were organised in January 2020 between the GPs of one county of the province (with GPs from other counties as controls) and the screening programme physician-in-chief to discuss the deployment and effectiveness of organised screening. Data was extracted from the National Healthcare System datasets and linear regression was used to assess the potential predictors of CRC screening uptake. Results The mean CRC screening uptake remained stable from 39.9% in 2018–19 to 40.8% in 2020–21 in the 22 GPs of the intervention county, whereas it statistically significantly decreased from 38.7% to 34.7% in the 232 control GPs. In multivariate analyses, belonging to the intervention county was associated with an improved uptake compared to the control counties (+5.1%; 95% Confidence Intervals – CI: 2.0%; 8.1%). Conclusion Persons cared for by GPs who received a tailored talk with a cancer screening specialist avoided a drop in CRC screening adherence, which characterised all other Italian screening programmes during the COVID-19 emergency. If future randomised trials confirm the impact of tailored talks, they may be incorporated into existing strategies to improve population CRC screening uptake.

Comparing a fecal immunochemical test and circulating tumor DNA blood test for colorectal cancer screening adherence.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs are most effective at reducing disease incidence and mortality through sustained screening participation. A novel blood test modality is being explored for CRC screening, but it is unclear whether it will provide sustained screening participation. This study aimed to investigate whether a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) blood test improved CRC screening re-participation when compared with a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and to define the predictors of sustained CRC screening in an Australian population. South Australians who initially participated in CRC screening using a ctDNA blood test (n=36) or FIT (n=547) were offered the same CRC screening test approximately 2years later through an extended phase of a randomized controlled trial. Surveys collected demographic, psychosocial, and clinical information. Predictors of CRC screening re-participation were explored using chi-square, Wilcoxon tests, and logistic regression. Participants offered a second ctDNA blood test were equally likely to re-participate in CRC screening as those who completed a FIT in the first round and who were offered the same test (61% vs 66% re-participation respectively, P=0.6). CRC fatalism, health activation, and self-efficacy were associated with repeated screening participation. Test awareness was predictive of repeated FIT-based CRC screening. Targeted interventions to improve CRC screening awareness and increase patient health activation may improve CRC screening adherence. A ctDNA blood test may be a suitable CRC screening option to maintain CRC screening adherence in people who do not participate in screening with FIT.

Barriers and Facilitators of Colorectal Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

COVID-19 introduced new barriers to health care including cancer screenings. This study evaluated the role of pandemic- and copay-related barriers to colonoscopy and the extent to which home-based testing methods were utilized. A cross-sectional survey assessed colorectal cancer (CRC) attitudes and screening early in the COVID-19 pandemic. Respondents (342; 50.37% female) were 62.32 (SD = 6.87) years old. Roughly half were White/Caucasian (329; 48.45%); 29.75% were Black/African American (202); and 21.80% were another race (148). Roughly two-thirds were up-to-date with CRC screening (459; 67.59%). In an adjusted model, those with a higher agreement that concerns about COVID-19 delayed scheduling their colonoscopy (OR = .79; 95% CI: .08, .63; P = .045) and concerns about copays delayed scheduling their colonoscopy (OR = .73; 95% CI: .73, .57; P = .02) were less likely to be up-to-date on screening. In another adjusted model, those screened during the pandemic were significantly more likely to be screened via an at-home test (OR = 10.93; 95% CI: 5.95, 20.27; P < .001). During the COVID-19 pandemic, screening copay-related concerns persisted and were significantly higher among those not up-to-date with CRC screening. Increased at-home testing and addressing copay barriers may increase CRC screening adherence now and in future infectious disease outbreaks.

Colorectal cancer screening uptake and adherence by modality at a large tertiary care center in the United States: a retrospective analysis

Objective Real-world data regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) screening adherence and use of various screening modalities is critical to improving efficacy of CRC prevention programs. We assessed overall CRC screening adherence rates and utilization by modality over a three-year period (2017-2019) within a large Primary Care network. Methods A retrospective review of individuals aged 50-75 years at average risk for CRC with at least one clinic visit in the previous 24 months. The primary outcome was CRC screening adherence each calendar year, overall and by modality, among the entire eligible population and among individuals newly completing screening (i.e., newly adherent). The final sample included 107,366 patients and 218,878 records. Results Overall CRC screening adherence increased from 2017 to 2019 (71% to 78%). Colonoscopy was the most utilized modality (up to approximately 74% were “up-to-date” with colonoscopy versus 4% for non-invasive options). However, utilization of various modalities accounting for individuals being “up-to-date” with screening changed over time, with the highest increase for mt-sDNA (10.2-fold increase), followed by FIT (1.6-fold increase) and colonoscopy (1.1-fold increase). Among newly adherent individuals, the proportion screened by colonoscopy and FOBT decreased (89% to 80% and 2.4% to 1.2%, respectively), while uptake of FIT and mt-sDNA increased (7.7% to 11.5% and 0.9% to 6.8%, respectively). Notably, FIT and mt-sDNA increased disproportionately among the age and race-ethnicity groups with the lowest overall screening rates. Conclusions In an opportunistic CRC screening program, adherence increased over time but remained below the national goal of 80%. Although colonoscopy remained the most utilized screening modality, colonoscopy uptake rates decreased, while utilization rates of mt-sDNA and FIT increased. Among minority populations, new uptake increased most with mt-sDNA and FIT. Multiple CRC screening options should be leveraged by patients and Providers to potentially improve the effectiveness and help address disparities in CRC prevention programs.

Abstract A139: Examining the association of cardiovascular health attainment with cancer screening adherence in community-dwelling Black women

Abstract Purpose of the study Cancer and cardiovascular disease are leading causes of death in the United States and share modifiable risk factors. Increasing ideal cardiovascular health indicated by the American Heart Association’s Life’s Simple 7 metrics (LS7: blood pressure, glucose, cholesterol, body mass index, physical activity, and smoking) and cancer screening adherence are both associated with reducing cancer-related mortality. However, there have been no studies to identify associations between LS7 and cancer screening adherence. It is well documented that people adopting positive health behaviors like physical activity and healthy eating have higher cancer screening adherence. Unfortunately, disparities by race exist in both engagement in health behaviors (key metrics of LS7) and cancer screening. Cancer screening disparities between Black and White women have narrowed over time; however, there are disparities in LS7 attainment by race. Here, we examined the association of LS7 attainment with screen detectable cancer (breast, cervical, and colorectal) adherence in Black women. Methods The Partnering in Negating Statistics (P.I.N.S.) for Black Women Initiative promotes health and wellness among Black women. Its community wellness events provide health education, screenings (e.g., breast, cervical, and cardiovascular health), and research participation opportunities. At P.I.N.S. events, LS7 metrics (score range 0-14) and self-reported cancer screening history were collected. The associations of LS7 with cancer screening adherence were examined using multinomial logistic regression adjusting for age, income, and education. Results In 2021 and 2022, 296 Black women participated in cardiovascular health screenings. They had a mean age of 50.1 years (SD 14.1); 66% employed; 88% insured; 69% with educational attainment ≥ college. The 166 participants with complete LS7 data had intermediate cardiovascular health with a median score of 8 [7-10]. In age adjusted models, a 1-unit increase in LS7 attainment was associated with a 45% higher odds of breast cancer screening adherence (OR 1.45, 95%CI: 1.03, 2.05; n=93), which was similar with full adjustment (OR 1.50, 95% CI: 0.95, 2.39; n=91). There was no association of LS7 attainment with cervical (OR 1.09, p=0.40; n=124) or colorectal cancer (OR 1.05, p=0.70; n=84) screening adherence. Conclusions In community-dwelling Black women, increasing LS7 attainment may increase odds of breast cancer screening adherence. Research with a larger sample is needed. Citation Format: Timiya S. Nolan, Songzhu Zhao, Amaris Williams, Guy Brock, Stephanie S. Ogonuwe, Faith Metlock, Alicia McKoy, Loletia Davis, Aldenise P. Ewing, Karen Patricia Williams, Electra D. Paskett, Joshua J. Joseph. Examining the association of cardiovascular health attainment with cancer screening adherence in community-dwelling Black women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A139.

Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Adherence to Fecal Occult Blood Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Screening adherence is important in reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. Disparity in CRC screening adherence was observed in populations of different socioeconomic status (SES), but the direction and strength of the association remained unclear. We aimed to systematically review all the observational studies that have analyzed the association between SES and adherence to organized CRC screening based on fecal occult blood tests. We systematically reviewed the studies in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science and reference lists of relevant reviews from the inception of the database up until June 7, 2023. Individual SES, neighborhood SES, and small-area SES were included, while any SES aggregated by geographic areas larger than neighbors were excluded. Studies assessing SES with any index or score combining indicators of income, education, deprivation, poverty, occupation, employment, marital status, cohabitation, and others were included. A random effect model meta-analysis was carried out for pooled odds ratios (ORs) and relative risks for adherence related to SES. Overall, 10 studies, with a total of 3,542,379 participants and an overall adherence rate of 64.9%, were included. Compared with low SES, high SES was associated with higher adherence (unadjusted OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.42-2.10; adjusted OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.28-1.82). In the subgroup of nonindividual-level SES, the adjusted association was significant (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.26-1.95). However, the adjusted association was insignificant in the subgroup of individual-level SES (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.98-2.17). As for subgroups of the year of print, not only was the unadjusted association significantly stronger in the subgroup of early studies (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.59-2.44) than in the subgroup of late studies (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.31-1.56), but also the adjusted one was significantly stronger in the early group (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.43-2.42) than in the late group (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14-1.39), which was consistent and robust. Despite being statistically insignificant, the strength of the association seemed lower in studies that did not adjust for race and ethnicity (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.21-1.43) than the overall estimate (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.28-1.82). The higher-SES population had higher adherence to fecal occult blood test-based organized CRC screening. Neighborhood SES, or small-area SES, was more competent than individual SES to be used to assess the association between SES and adherence. The disparity in adherence between the high SES and the low SES narrowed along with the development of interventions and the improvement of organized programs. Race and ethnicity were probably important confounding factors for the association.

Provincial variation in colorectal cancer screening adherence in Canada; evidence from the Canadian Partnership for Tomorrow's Health.

Although colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program is proven to reduce CRC incidence and mortality, understanding patterns and predictors of suboptimal adherence in screening program requires further investigation in Canada. We used self-reported data from five regional cohorts of the Canadian Partnership for Tomorrow's Health (CanPath), namely the BC Generations Project (BCGP), Alberta's Tomorrow Project (ATP), the Ontario Health Study (OHS), Quebec's CARTaGENE, and the Atlantic Partnership for Tomorrow's Health Study (Atlantic PATH). We stratified participants into the following four risk categories: 1) age 50-74 years, 2) family history in a first-degree relative, 3) personal history of chronic inflammatory bowel disease and/or polyps, and 4) co-existence of personal risk and family history. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of adherence to the screening guidelines. Adherence to CRC screening varied considerably between regions, ranging from 16.6% in CARTaGENE to 47.7% in OHS. Compared to the largest cohort OHS, the likelihood of non-adherence to CRC screening was significantly higher in BCGP (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.11-1.19), the Atlantic PATH (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.82-1.99) and CARTaGENE (OR 5.10, 95% CI 4.85-5.36). Low physical activity, current smoking, presence of personal risk, family history of CRC significantly reduced the likelihood of adherence to screening recommendations. Compared to the national target of ≥ 60% for participation in CRC screening, adherence to regular CRC screening was suboptimal in this cohort of Canadians and varied by region. Further efforts are needed to identify the specific barriers to screening adherence in different provinces and across risk categories.

Colorectal cancer screening completion by patients due or overdue for screening after reminders: a retrospective study

BackgroundPatient and clinician reminders were implemented as part of an adherence improvement project at University of Florida (UF) Internal Medicine Clinics. We sought to assess colorectal cancer (CRC) screening completion rates among patients not up-to-date with screening following distribution of reminders and to identify characteristics correlated with screening outcomes.MethodsRetrospective chart review was performed for patients not up-to-date with CRC screening for whom at least one reminder (patient and/or clinician) was issued in June 2018. The primary endpoint, the completion of a CRC screening test, is characterized as the ratio of completed screening tests to the number of patients not up-to-date with screening. All analyses were performed using R 4.0 software.ResultsOf the 926 patients included, 403 (44%; 95% CI, 0.40–0.47) completed a CRC screening test within 24 months following a reminder. Family history of CRC (relative risk (RR) 1.33; P = 0.007), flu immunization within two years of the reminder (RR 1.23; P = 0.019), and receiving a patient reminder either alone (RR 1.62; P < 0.001) or in combination with a clinician reminder (RR 1.55; P = 0.006) were positively associated with CRC screening completion. Reporting being divorced, separated, or widowed was negatively associated with screening completion (RR 0.70; P = 0.004).ConclusionReminders, in particular patient reminders, seem to be an effective method to enhance screening among patients not up-to-date with CRC screening. This study suggests that reminder efforts should be focused at the level of the patients and provides insight on target populations for practical interventions to further increase CRC screening adherence.

Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening by Time in the U.S. and Race/Ethnicity, 2010−2018

Longer time lived in the U.S. has been associated with worse health outcomes, especially preventable diseases, among racially and ethnically diverse groups of foreign-born individuals. This study evaluated the association between time lived in the U.S. and colorectal cancer screening adherence and whether this relationship differed by race and ethnicity. Data from the National Health Interview Survey for 2010-2018 among adults aged 50-75 years were used. Time in the U.S. was categorized as U.S.-born, foreign-born ≥15 years, and foreign-born <15 years. Colorectal cancer screening adherence was defined according to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. Generalized linear models with Poisson distribution were used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios and 95% CIs. Analyses were conducted in 2020-2022, were stratified by race and ethnicity, accounted for the complex sampling design, and were weighted to be representative of the U.S. Prevalence of colorectal cancer screening adherence was 63% overall, 64% for U.S.-born, 55% for foreign-born ≥15 years, and 35% for foreign-born <15 years. In fully adjusted models for all individuals, only foreign-born <15 years had lower adherence than U.S.-born (foreign-born≥15 years: prevalence ratio=0.97 [0.95, 1.00], foreign-born <15 years: prevalence ratio=0.79 [0.71, 0.88]). Results differed by race and ethnicity (p-interaction=0.002). In stratified analyses, findings for non-Hispanic White individuals (foreign-born ≥15 years: prevalence ratio=1.00 [0.96, 1.04], foreign-born <15 years: prevalence ratio=0.76 [0.58, 0.98]) and non-Hispanic Black individuals (foreign-born ≥15 years: prevalence ratio=0.94 [0.86, 1.02], foreign-born <15 years: prevalence ratio=0.61 [0.44, 0.85]) were similar to all individuals. Disparities by time in the U.S. were not observed among Hispanic/Latino individuals (foreign-born ≥15 years: prevalence ratio=0.98 [0.92, 1.04], foreign-born <15 years: prevalence ratio=0.86 [0.74, 1.01]) but persisted among Asian American/Pacific Islander individuals (foreign-born ≥15 years: prevalence ratio=0.84 [0.77, 0.93], foreign-born <15 years: prevalence ratio=0.74 [0.60, 0.93]). The relationship between colorectal cancer screening adherence and time in the U.S. varied by race and ethnicity. Culturally and ethnically tailored interventions are needed to improve colorectal cancer screening adherence among foreign-born people, especially among the most recently immigrated individuals.

Effect of Patient Characteristics on Uptake of Screening Using a Mailed Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kit

Mailing human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling kits increases cervical cancer screening participation, but effects may differ across subpopulations. Subpopulation data can inform US health care system implementation. To identify patient characteristics that modify effectiveness of a mailed kit intervention at increasing screening. This was a secondary analysis of data from the Home-Based Options to Make Cervical Cancer Screening Easy (HOME) randomized clinical trial conducted from 2014 to 2018 at Kaiser Permanente Washington. Data analysis was performed from March 2018 to May 2022. Individuals aged 30 to 64 years with female sex, health plan enrollment longer than 3 years and 5 months, a current primary care clinician, and no Papanicolaou test within the prior 3 years and 5 months were identified through electronic medical records and randomized (1:1) to the control or intervention group. The control group received usual care Papanicolaou screening reminders and outreach. The intervention group received usual care plus an unsolicited mailed HPV self-sampling kit. Screening uptake was captured within 6 months after randomization. Baseline patient characteristics (age, race, ethnicity, travel time to clinic, income, body mass index, tobacco use, health plan enrollment duration, time since last Papanicolaou test, mammography, comorbidities, and colorectal cancer screening adherence) were extracted from the electronic medical record. Of 19 734 individuals (mean [SD] age, 50.1 [9.5] years; 14 129 [71.6%] White), 9843 were randomized to the intervention group, and 9891 were randomized to the control group. Screening uptake was 26.3% (2592 of 9843 individuals) in the intervention group vs 17.4% (1719 of 9891 individuals) in the control group (relative risk [RR], 1.51; 95% CI, 1.43-1.60). Although absolute differences in uptake by group varied little by screening history, relative effects were greater with longer vs shorter time since last Papanicolaou test (no prior Papanicolaou test: RRs, 1.85-3.25; ≥10 years: RR, 2.78; 5-10 years: RRs, 1.69-1.86; <5 years: RRs 1.29-1.37). Relative effects were greater in participants overdue (RR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.73-2.38) vs up-to-date with mammography (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.41-1.67), although absolute difference was greater in the up-to-date group. Differences by age were not significant, with RRs of 1.33 to 1.48 across 5-year age groups in participants 30 to 54, vs 1.60 (95% CI, 1.40-1.82) in participants 55 to 59 and 1.77 (95% CI, 1.56-2.01) in participants 60 to 64 years. Among those mailed kits, there were differences in kit use vs in-clinic screening by age, race, plan enrollment duration, underscreening duration, and colorectal cancer screening adherence. In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, clinically important improvements in screening uptake were observed for all subgroups. Differences in magnitude of intervention effect and kit use highlighted opportunities to optimize HPV self-sampling for priority groups. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02005510.

Colorectal Cancer Screening Prevalence, Perceived Barriers, and Preference for Screening Colonoscopy Among Hospitalized Women.

A prospective intervention study among 510 hospitalized women, who are cancer-free (except for skin cancer) at enrollment, aged between 50 and 75 years was conducted at an academic center. Socio-demographic, family history, and medical comorbidities data were collected for all patients. A post-hospitalization follow-up survey determined the effect of inpatient intervention on colorectal cancer screening adherence. Unpaired t-test and chi-square tests were used to compare characteristics, perspectives, and preferences for screening among adherent and non-adherent groups. Mean age was 60.5 years, 45% reported an annual household income of <$20 000, 36% of women were African American, 27% of women were overdue for colorectal cancer screening, and 33% never had a screening colonoscopy. The most frequently reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening were "I have other problems more important than getting a colonoscopy," "No transportation to get to the test," and "Not counseled by primary care provider." Sixty-six percent of the non-adherent women would agree to have an inpatient screening colonoscopy if offered. A significant number of hospitalized women are non-adherent to colorectal cancer screening, while the educational intervention was partially successful in enhancing colorectal cancer screening, most hospitalized women remained non-adherent after hospitalization. A majority of these women were amenable to inpatient screening colonoscopy if offered during a hospital stay.

Adherence to colorectal cancer screening and healthcare resource utilization: a longitudinal analysis in Medicare beneficiaries aged 66–75 years

Objective In this study, we examined colorectal cancer (CRC) screening adherence in Medicare beneficiaries and associated healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and Medicare costs. Methods Using 20% Medicare random sample data, the study population included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 66–75 years on 1 January 2009, at average risk for CRC and continuously enrolled in Medicare Part A/B from 2008 to 2018. We excluded those who had undergone colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy during 2007–2008 and assumed everyone was due for screening in 2009; screening patterns were determined for 2009–2018. Based on US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations, individuals were categorized as adherent to screening, inadequately screened or not screened. HCRU and Medicare costs were calculated as mean per patient per year (PPPY). Results Of 895,846 eligible individuals, 13.2% were adherent to screening, 53.4% were inadequately screened, and 33.4% were not screened. Compared with those not screened, adherent or inadequately screened individuals were more likely to be female, White and have comorbidities. These individuals also used more healthcare services, generating higher Medicare costs. For example, physician visits were 14.6, 22.9 and 25.9 PPPY and total Medicare costs were $6102, $8469 and $9102 PPPY for those not screened, inadequately screened and adherent, respectively. Conclusions In Medicare beneficiaries at average risk, adherence to CRC screening was low, although the rate might be underestimated due to lack of early Medicare data. The link between HCRU and screening status suggests that screening initiatives independent of clinical visits may be needed to reach unscreened or inadequately screened individuals.

Predictors of Nonadherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening among Hospitalized Women.

Despite proven mortality benefit, disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening utilization persist, especially among younger women, minorities, and low-income women, even those who are insured. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate and estimate the effects of sociodemographic and clinical variables associated with nonadherence to CRC screening among hospitalized women. A cross-sectional bedside survey was conducted to collect sociodemographic and clinical comorbidity data believed to affect CRC screening adherence of hospitalized women aged 50 to 75 years who were cancer free (except skin cancer) at enrollment. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between these factors and nonadherence CRC screening. In total, 510 women were enrolled for participation in the study. After adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical predictors, only two variables were found to be independently associated with nonadherence to CRC screening: age younger than 60 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-4.33) and nonadherence to breast cancer screening (OR 3.72, 95% CI 2.29-6.04). By contrast, hospitalized women at high risk for CRC were more likely to be compliant with CRC screening (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.50). Both younger age and behavior toward screening remain barriers to CRC screening. Hospitalization creates an environment where patients are in close proximity to healthcare resources, and strategies could be used to capitalize on this opportunity to counsel, educate, and motivate patients toward this screening that is necessary for health maintenance. Seizing on this opportunity may help improve CRC screening adherence.

Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening adherence and the impact of COVID-19 on screening patterns in Connecticut, USA.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Many communities remain under the 80% CRC screening goal. We aimed to identify factors associated with non-adherence to CRC screening and to describe the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic in CRC screening patterns. A retrospective review of patients aged 50–75 years seen at the Griffin Faculty Physicians primary care offices between January 2019 and December 2020 was performed. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with CRC screening non-adherence. Of 12,189 patients, 66.2% had an updated CRC screen. On univariable logistic regression, factors associated with CRC screening non-adherence included age ≤ 55 years [odds ratio (OR) 2.267, p < 0.001], White/Caucasian race (OR 0.858, p = 0.030), Medicaid insurance (OR 2.097, p < 0.001), morbid obesity (OR 1.436, p < 0.001), current cigarette smoking (OR 1.849, p < 0.001), and elevated HbA1c (OR 1.178, p = 0.004). Age, Medicaid insurance, morbid obesity, current smoking, and HbA1c ≥ 6.5% remained significant in the final multivariable model. Compared to 2019, there was an 18.2% decrease in the total number of CRC screening tests in 2020. The proportion of colonoscopy procedures was lower in 2020 compared to the proportion of colonoscopy procedures conducted in 2019 (65.9% vs 81.7%, p < 0.001), with a concurrent increase in stool-based tests. CRC screening rates in our population are comparable to national statistics but below the 80% goal. COVID-19 affected CRC screening. Our results underscore the need to identify patient groups most vulnerable to missing CRC screening and highlight the importance of stool-based testing to bridge screening gaps.

Cost-Effectiveness of Waiving Coinsurance for Follow-Up Colonoscopy after a Positive Stool-Based Colorectal Screening Test in a Medicare Population.

Follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool-based test is necessary to complete the colorectal cancer-screening process. This analysis demonstrated that in a simulated Medicare population, waiving coinsurance for a follow-up colonoscopy improved estimated outcomes and was cost-effective when it was assumed that waiving the coinsurance modestly increased screening adherence. See related Spotlight, p. 641.

Cost-effectiveness of mt-sDNA versus mailed FIT outreach for Medicare Advantage enrollees using the CRC-AIM microsimulation model.

e18827 Background: Despite proven effectiveness in reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, screening for CRC remains underutilized, including those enrolled in Medicare Advantage. A mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach program may increase CRC screening adherence. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of stool-based tests (FIT and multi-target stool DNA [mt-sDNA]), with FIT offered via a mailed outreach program, in a Medicare Advantage population. Methods: The validated CRC-AIM microsimulation model was used to simulate the costs and clinical outcomes of 2 million average-risk individuals, free of diagnosed CRC at age 40, who initiated CRC screening at age 65. Annual mailed FIT outreach and triennial mt-sDNA were assessed. Test sensitivity and specificity inputs were based on the 2021 United States Preventative Services Task Force modeling study. FIT outreach program cost ($25.92) and direct costs for screening tests, colonoscopies (COLs), complications, and CRC care were included. The model employed a lifetime horizon, 3% discount rates, and a Medicare Advantage perspective. The primary analysis used published real-world adherence rates for stool-based tests and follow-up COLs (FIT/COL: 29%/53%; mt-sDNA/COL: 69.8%/71.5%). Secondary analyses assumed 100% adherence for stool-based tests and/or follow-up COLs and 20% higher than primary analysis for FIT and the corresponding follow-up COLs. Results: In the primary analysis, mt-sDNA had the greatest life-years gained (LYG), incidence reduction (IR), and mortality reduction (MR) and was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY compared to mailed FIT outreach (Table). This was true when 100% adherence was assumed for follow-up COL and when FIT had 20% higher adherence than the primary analysis. mt-sDNA had 64-129% greater LYG, 79-150% greater IR, and 68-146% greater MR than mailed FIT outreach. When assuming 100% adherence for both screening test and follow-up COL, mt-sDNA was dominated by mailed FIT outreach. Conclusions: Adherence to CRC screening modality and follow-up COL greatly impacts clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes. Future analysis should consider evidence-based, health plan-specific data to accurately reflect outcomes that aid in payer decision making.[Table: see text]

An Assessment of Physicians’ Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening and International Guidelines Awareness and Adherence: Results From a Thai National Survey

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake is generally low in the Asia Pacific and physicians’ recommendations affect the screening participation.ObjectiveThe study aimed to assess Thai physicians’ recommendations for CRC screening, and the awareness of and adherence to international guidelines.MethodsA survey containing questions assessing physicians’ demographic data, screening recommendations, and awareness of the international CRC screening guidelines assessed by clinical vignettes. Independent predictors of physicians’ recommendations for CRC screening were determined by logistic regression analysis.ResultsFive hundred and eighty-sixth of 1,286 (46%) physicians completed the survey, and 58% of them offered CRC screening. The majority of colorectal surgeons (91%) and gastroenterologists (86%) endorsed screening, whereas 35% of primary care physicians recommended screening. The patient’s age was the only factor influencing the physician’s decision to offer CRC screening (OR, 2.75: 95% CI, 1.61–4.67). Colonoscopy was the most recommended modality among specialists, whereas 60% of primary care physicians offered fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs). The guidelines awareness was noted in 81% of participants, with the highest rates among gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons. Gastroenterologists were more likely to adhere to the guidelines than surgeons, but both recommended shorter interval surveillance colonoscopy than guidelines recommendations in cases of small hyperplastic rectosigmoid polyps.ConclusionsRecommendations for CRC screening and awareness of guidelines vary among different specialties. A low proportion of primary care physicians recommended screening and colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists recommended shorter intervals for surveillance of small hyperplastic polyp than suggested by guidelines.