Abstract Color image enhancement refers to improving the visual quality of color images. This enhancement aims to make the images more visually appealing, precise, and easier to interpret, often by accentuating essential features or details while minimizing noise or distortion. Effective image enhancement is crucial in numerous fields like medical imaging; enhancing the medical image is vital for accurate diagnosis , and remote sensing . In security and surveillance, enhanced clarity in footage from surveillance cameras, especially in low-light scenarios, is crucial for identifying subjects and activities. However, image enhancement faces several challenges, like noise amplification and Over-enhancement, leading to unnatural-looking images with exaggerated or distorted features. In this paper, low-exposed or night color images are considered for enhancement, and this paper introduces exposure-based recursive histogram equalization techniques along with an Energy Curve instead of the conventional histogram, the energy curve is similar to a histogram based on spatial Contextual Information of an image. The proposed methods are Recursive Exposure-based Sub-image Histogram Equalization, Recursively Separated Exposure-based Sub-image Histogram Equalization, and Exposure-based Sub-image Histogram Equalization techniques considering spatial contextual information of images using an Energy Curve to improve results. These methods were tested on several publicly available datasets with low-contrast color images and compared with HE, BBHE, DSHE, CLAHE, ESIHE, R-ESIHE, and RS-ESIHE. The proposed techniques are evaluated using parameters like AMBE, PSNR, MSE, Entropy, SSIM, and FSIM. The average PSNR values for eight images using the aforementioned techniques were 9.10817, 20.80568, 12.82645, 10.39347, 16.27458, 15.19979, and 14.59595, respectively. In contrast, the proposed ESIHE with Energy Curve achieved a PSNR of 22.31585, outperforming other methods across multiple metrics, particularly excelling in noise reduction (PSNR), error minimization (MSE: 193.44), structural similarity (SSIM: 0.733319), and feature retention (FSIM: 0.917678). The comparison demonstrates that enhancement methods can be significantly improved by considering spatial contextual information.