In the July 2009 edition of the Journal [1] Harris and the C-CLEAR group reported a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies to quantify colorectal cancer risk associated with an increased BMI involving 67,361 incident cases. A higher BMI was associated with colon and rectal cancer in men but only colon cancer in women. Although increased BMI is associated with a modest increased risk the authors note that this may translate to large attributable proportions in high prevalence obese populations. This is important as such factors are modifiable for colorectal cancer prevention. Unfortunately the authors note that it remains to be seen whether reducing BMI will reduce cancer predisposition and allow formulation of appropriate public health strategies. In this edition of the Journal [2] the same group undertook a similar study to quantify gender specific risk associated with increased leisure time and physical activity, involving 7,873 incident cases. The authors identified an inverse association with colon cancer but not rectal cancer, although they noted that the benefits of less than the highest levels of LTPA may be small. The authors conclude that LTPA only intervention in cancer prevention is unlikely to impact substantially on incidence. In a further review in this edition [3] Seow Choen examines the claims of colonic hydrotherapy against known physiological facts. Advocates note that toxic overload in the colon may induce weight gain, fatigue, constipation, diarrhoea, mood swings, weakened immune system and stress. It is suggested hydrotherapy maybe of benefit in patients with allergies, arthritis, asthma, colonic stasis, bloating, candida, colitis in remission, constipation, diarrhoea, diverticulosis, flatulence, leaky gut, haemorrhoids, toxic headache, halitosis, indigestion, lethargy, mucous colitis, multiple sclerosis, parasitic infections, skin problems and urinary urgency! Seow Choen then provides a critique of the physiological basis for such claims referring to a formidable standard textbook of medical physiology, which struck fear in the heart of this editor as an undergraduate! The paper concludes there is no physiological basis for colonic hydrotherapy which may actually increase toxins and bacteria absorption and in unfortunate instances may result in rectal perforation, aplastic anaemia and disseminated abscess formation. Finally a case report in this edition indicates that melanosis coli from prolonged laxative abuse is reversible [4]. This editor is pleased to note that draconian measures to remove his middle-aged spread may have future benefits with regard to his predisposition to colon cancer but remains in a quandary as to whether to renew his annual gym membership in order to attain any further benefit from the highest levels of leisure time physical activity. He is relieved to acknowledge that the formidable tome which struck fear into his young heart during second MB provides a persuasive argument that his ongoing midlife co-morbidities may not require the services of an irrigationist and is reassured that any intermittent laxative use to regulate his profession induced colonic inertia will not result in lifelong mucosal stigmata. At present, however he will continue to rely on his low-dose aspirin and fish oil supplements as his only current lifestyle modification!