Colonic Diverticular Bleeding Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic hemostasis with a self-assembling peptide solution in patients with colonic diverticular bleeding: A multicenter pilot study

Background and aimsPuraStat (3-D Matrix, Tokyo, Japan) is an absorbent localized hemostatic agent that utilizes self-assembling peptide technology. In this multicenter pilot study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic hemostasis using PuraStat in patients with colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB). MethodsThis study involved patients who had CDB with stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) and underwent endoscopic hemostasis with PuraStat monotherapy or combination therapy comprising PuraStat with endoscopic band ligation (EBL) or clipping (Group A). Treatment outcomes and adverse events were assessed and compared with those of a previous cohort who underwent endoscopic hemostasis without PuraStat for CDB with SRH (Group B). Factors associated with the reduction of rebleeding were subsequently investigated. ResultsPuraStat was used in 25 patients with CDB. Their mean age was 70.8 years, 13 (52.0%) were male, and the most frequent bleeding sites were in the ascending colon [15 (60.0%) patients]. The success rate of endoscopic hemostasis was 100% (25/25); 2 patients were treated with PuraStat monotherapy and 23 with combination therapy (EBL, 13 patients; clipping, 10 patients). The success rates were comparable between Groups A and B (100% vs. 96.4%, P=1.000). The rate of rebleeding within 30 days was significantly lower in Group A than B (4.0% vs. 20.9%, P=0.047). Multivariate analyses revealed that the addition of Purastat was associated with the reduced risk of rebleeding (odds ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.01–0.95; P=0.045). ConclusionsPuraStat can be easily added to the conventional hemostatic methods for CDB, that could lower the risk of rebleeding.

Trends and Changes in Endoscopic Management and Clinical Outcomes of Colonic Diverticular Bleeding during the Coronavirus Disease-2019 Pandemic.

This study evaluated the endoscopic management and clinical outcomes of patients with colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A total of 388 hospitalized patients diagnosed with CDB at two hospitals during (April 2020-March 2023) and before (April 2017-March 2020) the pandemic were enrolled in the study. We performed one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) on the participants. We analyzed endoscopic management and clinical outcomes before and during the pandemic using a total of 264 patients matched in a PSM analysis. A total of 213 (1.3%) and 172 (1.2%) colonoscopies were performed before and during the pandemic, respectively in patients with CDB (P = 0.70). After PSM, the number of early colonoscopies (63.6% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.03) and colonoscopies performed outside regular working hours (23.8% vs. 47.7%, P < 0.01) was significantly lower during the pandemic than before it. A univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the risks of rebleeding within 30 days (odds ratio [OR]: 0.81, P = 0.42) and composite outcome (OR: 0.90, P = 0.69) were not increased during the pandemic. During the pandemic, the number of early colonoscopies and colonoscopies performed outside regular working hours decreased; however, this decrease did not influence rebleeding and composite outcome in patients with CDB.

Urgent Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography before Early Colonoscopy in the Management of Colonic Diverticular Bleeding: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) has been gaining attention as an initial investigation in the management of colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB), yet the role of CE-CT other than its diagnostic yield has not been adequately clarified. We aimed to determine whether the use of urgent CE-CT improves identification of stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) in subsequently performed early colonoscopy (≤24 h of arrival) or other clinical outcomes of CDB. Methods: We conducted a randomized, open-label, controlled trial at 23 institutions in Japan. Outpatients with suspected CDB were randomly assigned to undergo either urgent CE-CT followed by early colonoscopy (urgent-CE-CT + early-colonoscopy group) or early colonoscopy alone (early-colonoscopy group). The primary outcome was SRH identification. Secondary outcomes included successful endoscopic hemostasis, early (<30 days) and late (<1 year) rebleeding, length of hospital stay, and transfusion requirements. Results: In total, 240 patients, mostly in a hemodynamically stable condition, were randomized. A contrast extravasation on CE-CT was observed in 20 of 115 patients (17.4%) in the urgent-CE-CT + early-colonoscopy group. SRH was identified in 23 of 115 patients (20.0%) in the urgent-CE-CT + early-colonoscopy group and 21 of 118 patients (17.8%) in the early-colonoscopy group (difference, 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], −7.9 to 12.3; p = 0.739). Successful endoscopic hemostasis was achieved in 21 patients in each group (18.3% and 17.8%, respectively) (difference, 0.5; 95% CI, −9.4 to 10.4; p = 1.000). There were also no significant differences between groups in early and late rebleeding, length of hospital stay, and transfusion requirements. Conclusion: The use of urgent CE-CT before early colonoscopy did not improve SRH identification or other clinical outcomes in patients with suspected CDB in a hemodynamically stable condition. The routine use of urgent CE-CT as an initial investigation is not recommended in this population, also considering the low rate of extravasation-positive cases (UMIN registry number, UMIN000026865).

Self-assembling peptide improves the efficacy and safety of endoscopic band ligation for colonic diverticular bleeding

Self-assembling peptide improves the efficacy and safety of endoscopic band ligation for colonic diverticular bleeding

S961 Endoscopic Direct Clipping vs Indirect Clipping for Colonic Diverticular Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

S961 Endoscopic Direct Clipping vs Indirect Clipping for Colonic Diverticular Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Carbon dioxide-enhanced angiography for detection of colonic diverticular bleeding and clinical outcomes

PurposeTo determine the ability of CO2-enhanced angiography to detect active diverticular bleeding that is not detected by iodinated contrast medium (ICM)-enhanced angiography and its impact on clinical outcomes when used to confirm embolization, particularly the risks of rebleeding and ischemic complications.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively identified a cohort of patients with colonic diverticular bleeding who underwent catheter angiography between August 2008 and May 2023 at our institution. We divided them according to whether they underwent CO2 angiography following a negative ICM angiography study or to confirm hemostasis post-embolization (the CO2 angiography group) or ICM angiography alone in the absence of active bleeding or for confirmation of hemostasis post-embolization (the ICM angiography group). The ability to detect active colonic diverticular bleeding and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere were 31 patients in the ICM angiography group and 29 in the CO2 angiography group. The rate of detection of active bleeding by CO2 angiography that was not identified by ICM angiography was 48%. The rebleeding rate was 23% in the ICM angiography group and 6.9% in the CO2 angiography group. Among the patients who underwent TAE, the ischemic complications rate was 7.1% in the ICM angiography group and 4.5% in the CO2 angiography group.ConclusionsCO2 angiography may detect active diverticular bleeding that is not detectable by ICM angiography and appears to be associated with a lower rebleeding rate.Level of evidenceIV.Graphical

Comparative incidence and risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding following percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease: Insights from the Keio Cardiovascular Registry in Japan

BackgroundIn patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), antiplatelet medication usage is crucial for preventing thrombotic events. However, it requires careful monitoring, especially because of the risk of life-threatening bleeding complications. In hemorrhagic complications, assessment of patient background and risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) remain limited for GIB that develops during long-term observation after hospital discharge. This study aimed to examine the incidence of GIB and patient characteristics in CAD post-PCI. MethodsAll CAD patients undergoing PCI for urgent, emergent, or elective indications were enrolled in the Keio Interhospital Cardiovascular Studies (JCD-KiCS)-PCI registry (January 2009 and December 2017) and followed up to 2 years after PCI discharge. From the JCD-KiCS PCI registry, 8864 patients (median [interquartile range [IQR]] age: non-GIB: 69.0 y [16 y], upper GIB (UGI): 72.0 y [15.5 y], lower GIB (LGI): 73.0 y [IQR: 13 y]) were categorized based on the occurrence of hospitalization-requiring GIB. Patient characteristics and detailed information regarding these GIB events, including the location (upper vs lower GI) and bleeding severity, were analyzed. ResultsOverall, 36 patients experienced UGI, while 85 patients experienced LGI. The rates of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and triple therapy were significantly different among the non-GIB (n = 8734), UGI (n = 36) and LGI (n = 85) groups (DAPT [aspirin + P2Y12 (clopidogrel/prasugrel/ticlopidine)]: 64 [76.2 %] in the LGI group vs 24 [68.6 %] in the UGI group vs 7330 [84.6 %] in the non-GIB group; triple therapy [aspirin + P2Y12 (clopidogrel/prasugrel/ticlopidine)] + oral anticoagulant (OAC) (warfarin/direct oral anticoagulant [DOAC]): 17 [20.2 %] in the LGI group vs 8 [22.9 %] in the UGI group vs 836 [9.6 %] in the non-GIB group; p < 0.001). In the LGI and UGI groups, aspirin and warfarin were used in 2 (2.4 %) and 2 (5.7 %) patients, respectively, but not in combination with DOAC. The 2-year post-PCI hospitalization incidence for GIB was 1.4 % (LGI, 1.0 %; UGI, 0.4 %). The most common causes were colonic diverticular hemorrhage (43.5 %) for LGI and duodenal ulcer (21.9 %) for UGI. No significant differences were found in the cumulative 2-year post-PCI risks between the LGI and UGI groups (log-rank p = 0.97). Most GIB events were Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2-equivalent (hemoglobin decrease <3 g/dL). Notably, the use of OACs at PCI discharge, bleeding complications within 72 h, and preprocedural anemia were significantly correlated with an increased GIB risk. ConclusionsThe real-world incidence of LGI is two times higher than that of UGI in CAD patients undergoing PCI, and most events are mild. OAC use at PCI discharge is the strongest potential risk factor for GIB development.

Successful Indirect Clipping for the Bleeding Source of Colonic Diverticular Hemorrhage Using a Reopenable Clip (Regrasping Technique)

Successful Indirect Clipping for the Bleeding Source of Colonic Diverticular Hemorrhage Using a Reopenable Clip (Regrasping Technique)

Underwater detection and clipping using a reopenable clip with a long hood for colonic diverticular bleeding.

Underwater detection and clipping using a reopenable clip with a long hood for colonic diverticular bleeding.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic detachable snare ligation for colonic diverticular hemorrhage: Multicenter cohort study.

The hemostatic mechanism of endoscopic detachable snare ligation (EDSL) for colonic diverticular hemorrhage (CDH) is similar to that of endoscopic band ligation, which is effective and safe. However, because reports on EDSL are scarce, we conducted a two-center cohort study to evaluate its effectiveness. This study analyzed 283 patients with CDH treated with EDSL at two Japanese hospitals between July 2015 and November 2021. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the cumulative probability of rebleeding after EDSL. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to compare the effects of complete and incomplete ligation on rebleeding. The initial hemostasis success and early rebleeding rates were 97.9% and 11.0%, respectively. The time to hemostasis after identification of the bleeding site and total procedure time were 9 min and 44 min, respectively. Red blood cell transfusion was required for 32.9% of patients. The median hospital length of stay after EDSL was 5 days. The complete ligation rate of the early rebleeding group was significantly lower than that of the group without early rebleeding (P < 0.01). The 1-year cumulative rebleeding rate with EDSL was 28.2%. Complete ligation was associated with decreased cumulative rebleeding after EDSL (P < 0.01). One patient experienced colonic diverticulitis; however, colonic perforation was not observed. Complete ligation is associated with reduced short-term and long-term rebleeding. EDSL could be valuable for CDH because of its low rebleeding rate and the absence of serious adverse events.

Advances in endoscopic management of colonic diverticular bleeding.

This review is focused on diagnostic and management strategies for colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB). It aims to present the current state of the field, highlighting the available techniques, and emphasizing findings that influence the choice of therapy. Recent guidelines recommend nonurgent colonoscopy (>24 h) for CDB. However, factors such as a shock index ≥1, which may warrant an urgent colonoscopy, remain under investigation.The standard approach to detecting the source of CDB requires a water-jet scope equipped with a cap. Innovative diagnostic techniques, such as the long-cap and tapered-cap, have proven effective in identifying stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH). Furthermore, the water or gel immersion methods may aid in managing massive hemorrhage by improving the visualization and stabilization of the bleeding site for subsequent intervention. Innovations in endoscopic hemostasis have significantly improved the management of CDB. New therapeutic methods such as endoscopic band ligation and direct clipping have substantially diminished the incidence of recurrent bleeding. Recent reports also have demonstrated the efficacy of cutting-edge techniques such as over-the-scope clips, which have significantly improved outcomes in complex cases that have historically necessitated surgical intervention. Currently available endoscopic diagnostic and hemostatic methods for CDB have evolved with improved outcomes. Further research is necessary to refine the criteria for urgent colonoscopy and to confirm the effectiveness of new endoscopic hemostasis techniques.

Endoscopic Hemostasis Using Bipolar Coagulation of Small Colonic Diverticular Bleeding With a Microcaliber Tip Cap Under Direct Visualization.

Endoscopic Hemostasis Using Bipolar Coagulation of Small Colonic Diverticular Bleeding With a Microcaliber Tip Cap Under Direct Visualization.

Over-the-scope clip rescue method of endoscopic hemostasis for severe acute colonic diverticular bleeding.

Watch a video of this article.

National trends in hospitalizations for gastrointestinal bleeding in Japan.

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a significant public health concern, predominantly associated with high morbidity. However, there have been no reports investigating the trends of GIB in Japan using nationwide data. This study aims to identify current trends and issues in the management of GIB by assessing Japan's national data. We analyzed National Database sampling data from 2012 to 2019, evaluating annual hospitalization rates for major six types of GIB including hemorrhagic gastric ulcers, duodenal ulcers, esophageal variceal bleeding, colonic diverticular bleeding, ischemic colitis, and rectal ulcers. In this study, hospitalization rates per 100,000 indicated a marked decline in hemorrhagic gastric ulcers, approximately two-thirds from 41.5 to 27.9, whereas rates for colonic diverticular bleeding more than doubled, escalating from 15.1 to 34.0. Ischemic colitis rates increased 1.6 times, from 20.8 to 34.9. In 2017, the hospitalization rate per 100,000 for colonic diverticular bleeding and ischemic colitis surpassed those for hemorrhagic gastric ulcers (31.1, 31.3, and 31.0, respectively). No significant changes were observed for duodenal ulcers, esophageal variceal bleeding, or rectal ulcers. The findings of this study underscore a pivotal shift in hospitalization frequencies from upper GIB to lower GIB in 2017, indicating a potential shift in clinical focus and resource allocation.

Characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors of surgery for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: nationwide cohort study of 10,342 hematochezia cases.

Current evidence on the surgical rate, indication, procedure, risk factors, mortality, and postoperative rebleeding for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB) is limited. We constructed a retrospective cohort of 10,342 patients admitted for acute hematochezia at 49 hospitals (CODE BLUE J-Study) and evaluated clinical data on the surgeries performed. Surgery was performed in 1.3% (136/10342) of the cohort with high rates of colonoscopy (87.7%) and endoscopic hemostasis (26.7%). Indications for surgery included colonic diverticular bleeding (24%), colorectal cancer (22%), and small bowel bleeding (16%). Sixty-four percent of surgeries were for hemostasis for severe refractory bleeding. Postoperative rebleeding rates were 22% in patients with presumptive or obscure preoperative identification of the bleeding source and 12% in those with definitive identification. Thirty-day mortality rates were 1.5% and 0.8% in patients with and without surgery, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that surgery-related risk factors were transfusion need ≥ 6 units (P < 0.001), in-hospital rebleeding (P < 0.001), small bowel bleeding (P < 0.001), colorectal cancer (P < 0.001), and hemorrhoids (P < 0.001). Endoscopic hemostasis was negatively associated with surgery (P = 0.003). For small bowel bleeding, the surgery rate was significantly lower in patients with endoscopic hemostasis as 2% compared to 12% without endoscopic hemostasis. Our cohort study elucidated the outcomes and risks of the surgery. Extensive exploration including the small bowel to identify the source of bleeding and endoscopic hemostasis may reduce unnecessary surgery and improve the management of ALGIB.

Urgent colonoscopy is not necessary in case of colonic diverticular bleeding without extravasation on contrast-enhanced computed tomography

Background and aimsAcute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB) increase with age and the administration of antiplatelet drugs. Colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB) is the most common cause of ALGIB, and endoscopic hemostasis is an effective treatment for massive CDB. But in patients without extravasation on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), the efficacy of urgent colonoscopy (UCS) is controversial from the point of the clinical course, including rebleeding rate. We aimed to establish a potential strategy including UCS for CDB patients without extravasation on CECT. Patients and methodsPatients from two centers treated for CDB without extravasation on CECT between July 2014 and July 2019 were retrospectively identified (n = 282). Seventy-four underwent UCS, and 208 received conservative management. We conducted two analyses. The first analysis investigates the risk factors of rebleeding rate within 5 days after administration (very early rebleeding), and no UCS (NUCS) was not the independent factor of the very early rebleeding. The second analysis is whether UCS positively influenced the clinical course after hospitalization. ResultsThe prevalence of very early rebleeding and early rebleeding (6–30 days from admission), patients requiring blood transfusion within 0–5 days and 6–30 days post-admission, and duration of hospitalization were examined as clinical course factors between UCS and NUCS group. There was no significant difference between the UCS and non-UCS groups in the clinical course factors. UCS for the CDB patients without extravasation was not improved rebleeding rate and clinical course. ConclusionsUCS is not necessary in case ofCDB patient without extravasation on CECT.

Risk factors for patients hospitalized with recurrent colon diverticular bleeding: a single center experience.

Colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB) is a common cause of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients with CDB are at increased risk for recurrence. Here, we aimed to evaluate the clinical course of patients with CDB and identify risk factors for recurrent CDB (rCDB). We included patients who were hospitalized at a single tertiary center for management of CDB between January 2005 and March 2020. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to evaluate the risk factors of patients with rCDB as follows: model 1 adjusted by age, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and presence of bilateral colon diverticula; model 2 adjusted by age, CCI, and presence of left side colon diverticula; model 3 adjusted by age, CCI, and presence of sigmoid colon diverticula. Among 219 patients (mean age, 68.0 years; 55 females), 56 and 163 had definite and presumptive CDB, respectively. During the median period of 506 days, 62 patients (28.3%) experienced rCDB. CCI score ≥ 4 was independently associated with rCDB in models 1, 2 and 3 (all p < 0.05). Age ≥ 75 years was independently associated with rCDB in models 1 and 2 (both p < 0.05). The presence of bilateral colon and sigmoid colon diverticula were independently associated with rCDB in models 1 and 3, respectively (both p < 0.05). rCDB frequently occurred at any time in patients with previous CDB. High CCI scores and distribution of colon diverticula were associated with rCDB. Clinicians should consider a possible rCDB for a patient considering age, comorbidity, and distribution of colon diverticula.

Is bowel preparation necessary for early colonoscopy in patients with suspected colonic diverticular bleeding?: A multicenter retrospective study with propensity score matching analysis.

There are few reports on bowel preparation for early colonoscopy in patients with suspected colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB). We aim to clarify in a retrospective, multicenter study. In a multicenter retrospective cohort study at 10 institutions, we analyzed clinical features of patients diagnosed with CDB, who underwent early colonoscopy within 24h. We compared patients who were prepared with polyethylene glycol lavage (PEL) and those without PEL. We evaluated the effects of PEL for early colonoscopy in patients with suspected CDB. A total of 129 (53%) underwent under preparation with PEL and 113 patients without PEL. The PEL group was younger, had fewer comorbidities, and had better performance status. After adjusting for these variables with propensity score matching, the PEL group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (7.9±4.7 vs. 10.1±5.2 days; p=0.001), and a higher cecal intubation rate (91.1% vs. 50.0%; p<0.001). There were no significant differences in adverse event rates, identification of stigmata of recent hemorrhage, or frequency in endoscopic hemostatic treatment. PEL may be preferred for early colonoscopy in patients suspected of having CDB.

Detection of colonic diverticular bleeding by observation using a calibrated, small-caliber tip, transparent hood.

Watch a video of this article.

S3144 A Tale of Two Tics: A Rare Case of Acute Consecutive Small Bowel and Colonic Diverticular Bleeding

S3144 A Tale of Two Tics: A Rare Case of Acute Consecutive Small Bowel and Colonic Diverticular Bleeding