College Of Surgeons Of East, Central And Southern Africa Research Articles

A cross‐sectional survey on surgeon retention in the COSECSA region after specialist training: Have things changed?

AbstractBackgroundIncreasing surgical specialist workforce density in sub‐Saharan Africa is essential for improving access to surgical care. However, out‐migration creates a significant challenge to attaining provider targets. We aimed to determine the rates and trends of retention of surgeons in the College of Surgeons of East Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA) regions.MethodologyAn online, web‐based survey was distributed to COSECSA surgeons who graduated from 2004 to 2020. Current practice and migration patterns were visualized using descriptive analyses and logistic regression models.ResultsResponse rate was 48% (270/557). Most respondents trained as general surgeons and practiced in Ethiopia, Kenya, Zimbabwe, and Zambia. Majority practiced in public hospitals (74%), and were active in research (81%), teaching (84%) and leadership (55%). Overall country (85%), regional (92%) and Africa retention rates (99%) were high with 100% country retention in Rwanda, Botswana, Lesotho, and Namibia. Tanzania had the lowest retention (61%). Highest inter‐regional migration occurred from East to Southern Africa (26%), and continental out‐migration occurred from Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Kenya. On bivariate analysis, out‐migration from training country and region was associated working with a non‐governmental organization (p = 0.002 and 0.0003) or a specialized hospital (p = 0.046 and 0.011). A multiple regression model with type of institution and leadership was a poor fit (McFadden R2 = 0.055; p = 0.082).ConclusionRetention rates of surgeons trained by COSECSA in the region remain remarkably high. This can be taken as an indicator of success of the training model to increase surgical workforce density, however, contributory factors need to be qualitatively explored.

Operative Case Volumes and Variation for General Surgery Training in East, Central, and Southern Africa

BackgroundOperative experience is a necessary part of surgical training. The College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA), which oversees general surgery training programs in the region, has implemented guidelines for the minimum necessary case volumes upon completion of two (Membership) and five (Fellowship) years of surgical training. We aimed to review trainee experience to determine whether guidelines are being met and examine the variation of cases between countries.MethodsOperative procedures were categorized from a cohort of COSECSA general surgery trainees and compared to the guideline minimum case volumes for Membership and Fellowship levels. The primary and secondary outcomes were total observed case volumes and cases within defined categories. Variations by country and development indices were explored.ResultsOne hundred ninety-four trainees performed 69,283 unique procedures related to general surgery training. The review included 70 accredited hospitals and sixteen countries within Africa. Eighty percent of MCS trainees met the guideline minimum of 200 overall cases; however, numerous trainees did not meet the guideline minimum for each procedure. All FCS trainees met the volume target for total cases and orthopedics; however, many did not meet the guideline minimums for other categories, especially breast, head and neck, urology, and vascular surgery. The operative experience of trainees varied significantly by location and national income level.ConclusionsSurgical trainees in East, Central, and Southern Africa have diverse operative training experience. Most trainees fulfill the overall case volume requirements; however, further exploration of how to meet the demands of specific categories and procedures is necessary.

Exploring Laparoscopic Surgery Training Opportunities in the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa region

The resource-limited environment in Sub-Saharan countries, with a lack of expert trainers, impedes the progress of laparoscopic training. This study aimed to identify the opportunities and limitations of laparoscopic surgery training in the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) countries. A multicountry online survey was conducted from January 2021 to October 2021 in COSECSA-accredited training hospitals within 16 countries. Available resources and challenges faced in order to set up well-structured laparoscopic training programs were explored. Ninety-four surgeons answered the questionnaire. The average resources reported per hospital were 3 trained laparoscopic surgeons, 2 laparoscopic towers, and 2 sets of laparoscopic instruments. The training of the majority of these surgeons has been in local institutions (53%), a further 37% within African countries and only 10% outside Africa. Approximately 45% of them declared that laparoscopic modules were planned within the University Curricula, while only 18% of surgeons recognized that laparoscopic modules are only planned within the COSECSA program. About 57% of participants reported that at the end of residency training, graduating surgeons were not able to perform basic laparoscopic procedures. The quoted barriers included: limited laparoscopic equipment, absence of simulation lab, lack of qualified trainers, lack of training programs and time for teaching by skilled doctors, and lack of institutional support. The well-structured set up of laparoscopic training programs in the COSECSA region is hindered due to the lack of qualified personnel and insufficient resources for the acquisition of equipment and simulation laboratories. Ongoing efforts to set up laparoscopic programs through the development of adaptive curricula, innovative strategies for reduction of equipment cost and adequate training of surgeons are crucial for patient safety and the development of laparoscopy.

Laparoscopy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Survey Study.

An increasing shift towards non-communicable diseases and an existing high surgical burden of disease in low-middle-income countries (LMICs) has impelled the need for implementing laparoscopic surgery, a safe and cost-effective surgical service. However, despite countless benefits, laparoscopic surgery programs remain limited throughout LMICs, and limited understanding is known of healthcare professionals' views regarding the implementation of laparoscopic surgery in their local healthcare environments. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to better understand the perceived challenges and barriers to implementing long-term laparoscopic surgery programs from the perspective of healthcare professionals. Upon receiving ethical approval from the McGill University Health Center (MUHC), a nine-question survey (concerning attributes required to establish a successful laparoscopic program in LMICs and to gain insight into what surgeons from LMICs believed were the necessary next steps) was pilot tested amongst faculty members, and subsequently disseminated to healthcare professionals practicing in LMICs. Explicit consent was obtained from the participants before answering the survey. Results: Thirty-four participants representing a total of 35 countries participated in the survey with the majority having received laparoscopic surgery training. Overall, participant responses were characterized by two major themes. Highlighted in the first theme, Laparoscopic Experience and Training Curriculum, were responses concerning current laparoscopic training and education, improved career opportunities provided by laparoscopic training, and a particular existing potential to incorporate laparoscopic surgery into the current surgical curriculum at various levels of training. Emphasized in the second theme, Challenges and Next Steps, were responses concerning barriers to the implementation of laparoscopic surgery, current institutional capabilities, and the need for improving mentorship through existing surgical societies such as the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA), West African College of Surgeons (WACS), and The Pan-African Academy of Christian Surgeons (PAACS). A buy-in from the government, hospitals, staff, and industry is crucial for the long-term implementation of laparoscopic surgery in LMICs, which can only be accomplished through increased advocacy and the dissemination of the benefits of minimally invasive surgery both economically and socially.

Assessment of resource capacity and barriers to effective practice of laparoscopic surgery in training hospitals affiliated with the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA).

The adoption and accessibility of laparoscopy have been serious issues in countries with limited resources, and for varied reasons. This study assessed resource capacity and barriers to the effective practice of laparoscopic surgery in training hospitals affiliated with the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA). A multi-country survey was conducted from January 2021 to October 2021 using a questionnaire distributed to surgeons in COSECSA hospitals located in 16 different countries.Available resources and surgical volume were assessed, and the barriers to routinely performing laparoscopy were determined. Ninety-four surgeons working in 44 different hospitals from 16 countries participated in the survey. The majority of respondents were general surgeons (n = 75, 79.7%). Other specialties included urology (n = 12, 12.8%) and pediatric surgery (n = 7, 7.4%). Senior surgeons accounted for 60.6% of participants, more than 40% had a managerial position and approximately 20% were surgical trainees. Most respondents practiced in public hospitals (n = 66, 70.2%). A median of three surgeons per hospital performed laparoscopic surgery with, on average, two laparoscopic towers and two sets of laparoscopic instruments available. A median of 10 procedures was carried out per month. The cost of laparoscopic procedures and laparoscopic consumables were reported as being covered by some health insurance payments in 76.9% and 48.4% of cases, respectively. Cholecystectomy was the most commonly reported laparoscopic procedure performed. The five top barriers to performing laparoscopic surgery were: a lack of consumables, a limited quantity of equipment, a lack of skilled surgeons, the high cost of laparoscopic procedures and complicated cases. In addition, having access to skilled anesthesiologists and anesthesia equipment, carbon dioxide, a consistent electric power supply and equipment maintenance were cited as significant challenges. The practice of laparoscopy is currently limited in COSECSA countries due to a scarcity of skilled staff and the lack of a funding plan to make laparoscopic services accessible. Therefore, policymakers and stakeholders should take strategic measures to respond to this need.

22. Paradigms for Plastic Surgery Training Programs in sub-Saharan Africa

Background: Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is one of the world’s geographic regions with the greatest need for expanded plastic surgery training and infrastructure to address its burden of surgical disease. The present study reviews the educational structure and existing training programs in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS) throughout SSA to provide transparency as to the educational paradigms and help identify where unmet needs are the greatest. Methods: The respective websites of the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA), the West African College of Surgeons (WACS), and the Colleges of Medicine of South Africa (CMSA) were reviewed by the authors. Additionally, anecdotal evidence informed by authors who have trained or are currently members of these colleges was utilized when available website information was lacking. Results: After completing medical school and a governmentally sponsored internship, COSECSA, including 19 countries, requires 2 years of general surgery training prior to 3 years of PRS. There are currently 13 accredited programs in COSECSA to train PRS trainees, with 5 graduates completing their training in 2020. CMSA similarly requires 2 years of general surgery and 3 years of PRS training at one of the 8 accredited programs in South Africa. WACS, including 14 countries, requires 2.5-3 years of general surgery in addition to 3 years of PRS. There are 32 accredited programs, 29 in Nigeria and 3 in Ghana, approved for 116 resident positions. In April 2022, 5 WACS trainees passed their exams to become board certified plastic surgeons. The ratio of PRS-accredited programs to the number of countries in each region is demonstrated. Conclusion: The requirements for plastic surgery training in SSA are fairly consistent throughout the region. However, COSECSA, which includes the largest number of African countries, has less than 1/3 the ratio of accredited programs per country compared to any other region in SSA. Increased transparency and collaboration between SSA and other African regions will help each of these programs continue to expand to meet their surgical needs.

The Evolving Landscape of Medical Device Regulation in East, Central, and Southern Africa.

Effective regulatory frameworks, harmonized to international standards, are critical to expanding access to quality medical devices in low- and middle-income countries. This review provides a summary of the state of medical device regulation in the 14 member countries of the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) and South Africa. Countries were categorized according to level of regulatory establishment, which was found to be positively correlated to gross domestic product (GDP; rs=0.90) and years of freedom from colonization (rs=0.60), and less positively correlated to GDP per capita (rs=0.40). Although most countries mandate medical device regulation in national legislation, few employ all the guidelines set forth by the World Health Organization. A streamlined regulatory process across African nations would simplify this process for innovators seeking to bring medical devices to the African market, thereby increasing patient access to safe medical devices.

Surgical Simulation in East, Central, and Southern Africa: A Multinational Survey

High-income countries have increased the use of simulation-based training and assessment for surgical education. Learners in low- and middle-income countries may have different educational needs and levels of autonomy but they and their patients could equally benefit from the procedural training simulation provides. We sought to characterize the current state of surgical skills simulation in East, Central, and Southern Africa and determine residents' perception and future interest in such activities. A survey was created via collaboration and revision between trainees and educators with experiences spanning high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries. The survey was administered on paper to 76 trainees (PGY2-3) who were completing the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) Membership of the College of Surgeons examination in Kampala, Uganda in December 2019. Data from paper responses were summarized using descriptive statistics and frequencies. We received responses from 43 trainees (57%) from 11 countries in sub-Saharan Africa who participated in the examination. Fifty-eight percent of respondents reported having dedicated space for surgical skills simulation training, and most (91%) had participated in some form of simulation activity at some point in their training. However, just 16% used simulation as a regular part of training. The majority of trainees (90%) felt that surgical skills learned in simulation were transferrable to the operating room and agreed it should be a required part of training. Seventy-one percent of trainees felt that simulation could objectively measure technical skills, and 73% percent of respondents agreed that simulation should be integrated into formal assessment. However, residents split on whether proficiency in simulation should be achieved prior to operative experience (54%) and if nontechnical skills could be measured (51%). The most common cited barriers to the integration of surgical simulation into residents' education were lack of suitable tools and models (85%), funding (73%), and maintenance of facilities (49%). Residents from East, Central, and Southern Africa strongly agree that simulation is a valuable educational tool and ought to be required during their surgical residency. Barriers to achieving this goal include availability of affordable tools, adequate funding and confidence in the value of the educational experience. Trainees affirm further efforts are necessary to make simulation more widely available in these contexts.

Plastic Surgery Across Continents: A Comparison of Residency Training in Subsaharan Africa and the United States.

There is a demonstrated need for access to plastic surgical care in low- and middle-income countries worldwide. Recently, there is increasing interest in promoting transcontinental partnerships between academic institutions to improve training opportunities for local surgeons while increasing access to care for patients. Before such programs can be established, it is crucial for US-based surgeons and educators to understand the existing training models in different countries. The aim of this study is to identify the current plastic surgery training model in the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) group of African nations and compare this to training in the United States. The curricula of 2 accrediting bodies of plastic surgery, COSECSA and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education of the United States, were compared. Similarities included the length of dedicated plastic surgery training, curriculum content, and final evaluation structure. Differences include training pathways, assessment methodology, and regulation regarding specific competencies, program requirements, and resident benefits. These findings establish a baseline understanding of how plastic surgical training is organized, delivered, and evaluated in Africa, highlight opportunities for educational initiatives, and serve as a foundation for future efforts to develop collaborative partnerships in these communities. Future research will include a survey sent to program directors and plastic surgery attendings in the COSECSA regions to gather additional information.

Analysing the Operative Experience of Paediatric Surgical Trainees in Sub-Saharan Africa Using a Web-Based Logbook

BackgroundThe expansion of local training programmes is crucial to address the shortages of specialist paediatric surgeons across Sub-Saharan Africa. This study assesses whether the current training programme for paediatric surgery at the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA) is exposing trainees to adequate numbers and types of surgical procedures, as defined by local and international guidelines.MethodsUsing data from the COSECSA web-based logbook, we retrospectively analysed numbers and types of operations carried out by paediatric surgical trainees at each stage of training between 2015 and 2019, comparing results with indicative case numbers from regional (COSECSA) and international (Joint Commission on Surgical Training) guidelines.ResultsA total of 7,616 paediatric surgical operations were recorded by 15 trainees, at different stages of training, working across five countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Each trainee recorded a median number of 456 operations (range 56–1111), with operative experience increasing between the first and final year of training. The most commonly recorded operation was inguinal hernia (n = 1051, 13.8%). Trainees performed the majority (n = 5607, 73.6%) of operations recorded in the eLogbook themselves, assisting in the remainder. Trainees exceeded both local and international recommended case numbers for general surgical procedures, with little exposure to sub-specialities.ConclusionsTrainees obtain a wide experience in common and general paediatric surgical procedures, the number of which increases during training. Post-certification may be required for those who wish to sub-specialise. The data from the logbook are useful in identifying individuals who may require additional experience and centres which should be offering increased levels of supervised surgical exposure.

Developing Research Potential and Building Partnerships: A Report of the Fundamentals of Surgical Research Course at the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa

BackgroundApproximately a decade after the inaugural Fundamentals of Surgical Research Course (FSRC) at the West African College of Surgeons meeting (2008), the Association for Academic Surgery expanded the course offering to the annual meeting of the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA). After the second annual offering of the course in 2019, participants were surveyed to assess the impact of the course. MethodsA survey was distributed to the attendees of the 2019 second COSECSA FSRC course, held in December 2019 in Kampala, Uganda. Approximately 80 people attended at least a portion of the full-day course. Forty-nine participants completed the voluntary survey questionnaire distributed to assess each session of the course at course completion. ResultsTen different countries were represented among the attendees. Of the 49 evaluations, 35 respondents were male and six were female. Eight respondents did not identify a gender. Surgical residents comprised 19 of the 49 attendees, and one of the 49 attendees was a medical student. Thirty-five respondents indicated that their views of surgical research had changed after attending the course. ConclusionsThe second annual FSRC at COSECSA confirmed significant interest in building research skills and partnerships in sub-Saharan Africa. A wide variety of learners attended the course, and a majority of the sessions received overwhelmingly positive feedback. Multiple conference attendees expressed interest in serving as faculty for the course moving forward, highlighting a viable path for sustainability as the Association for Academic Surgery develops an international research education platform.

Laparoscopic experience and attitudes toward a low-cost laparoscopic system among surgeons in East, Central, and Southern Africa: a survey study.

Laparoscopic surgery has become standard of care in high-income countries but is rarely accessible in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study assessed experience with laparoscopy and attitudes toward a low-cost laparoscopic system among surgeons in sub-Saharan Africa. A survey assessing current laparoscopic practice and feedback on a low-cost laparoscopic system was administered to attendees of the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) Scientific Conference between December 4 and December 6, 2019 in Kampala, Uganda. Fifty-six surgeons from 14 countries participated. A majority were male (n = 46, 82%) general surgeons (n = 37, 66%) from tertiary/teaching hospitals (n = 36, 64%). For those with training in laparoscopy (n = 33, 59%), 22 (67%) reported less than 1year of training and over half (n = 17, 52%) reported 1month or less. Overall, a minority (n = 21, 38%) used laparoscopy in current practice, with 57% (n = 12) of those performing laparoscopy less than once per week. The most common laparoscopic surgeries performed were cholecystectomy (n = 15), diagnostic laparoscopy (n = 14), and appendectomy (n = 12). Few surgeons were performing more complex cases (n = 5). Barriers to laparoscopy included poor access to training equipment (n = 34, 61%), mentors (n = 33, 59%), laparoscopic equipment (n = 31, 55%), equipment maintenance (n = 25, 45%), access to consumable supplies (n = 21, 38%), and cost (n = 31, 55%). Fifty-two participants (93%) were interested in increasing their use of laparoscopy; the majority felt that a low-cost laparoscope (n = 52, 93%) and lift retractor for gasless laparoscopy (n = 46, 82%) would serve an unmet need in their practice. While the use of laparoscopy is currently limited in COSECSA countries, there is a significant interest among surgeons to increase implementation. A low-cost, durable laparoscopic system was viewed as a potential solution to the current barriers and could improve implementation in LMICs.

In memoriam: Mr Jimmy James (1940–2019). His contribution to the training of surgeons in Malawi and the College of Surgeons of East Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA) region

John “Jimmy” James MB ChB FRCS Ed passed on the 4th December 2019, the day we had our COSECSA annual general meeting in Kampala, Uganda. He died after a short battle with metastatic prostate cancer.

Predictors of Burnout and Depression in Surgeons Practicing in East, Central, and Southern Africa

BackgroundSurgeons are at risk of burnout and depression, which can lead to medical errors, inefficiency, exhaustion, conflicts, and suicide. Significant challenges exist in sub-Saharan Africa that may increase the prevalence of burnout and depression, but no formal evaluation has identified stressors specific to this environment. MethodsA survey was distributed to all members of the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA). Burnout, depression, and stressors were assessed with validated measures: Maslach Burnout Inventory for Medical Personnel, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9, and Holmes-Rahe Life Stress Inventory. ResultsThere were 131 participants (98 African and 33 non-African surgeons). The incidence of moderate to severe depression was 48% (n = 63), and the incidence of burnout was as high as 38% (n = 48). There were no significant differences between African and non-African surgeons in marital status, number of children, partners in practice, or distribution of time. More African surgeons experienced birth of a child (18% versus 3%, P = 0.04) but had less workplace conflict (7.1% versus 10.7%, P = 0.045) than non-African surgeons. African surgeons more consistently felt they were positively influencing others (P = 0.008), enjoyed working with patients (P = 0.009), and were more satisfied (P = 0.04). For all surgeons, predictors of increased PHQ-9 depression were serious professional conflict (P = 0.02), difficulty accessing childcare (P = 0.04), and racial discrimination (P = 0.003). In the Maslach model, predictors of burnout were difficulty accessing childcare (P = 0.05) and denial of promotion based on gender (P = 0.006). ConclusionsBurnout and depression in surgeons practicing in East, Central, and Southern Africa are substantial. Despite significant challenges, African surgeons tended to have a more positive outlook on their work. Improvements can be made to reduce burnout and depression by focusing on work conditions, equality of promotion opportunities, workplace conflict management, childcare support, and increasing the numbers of surgeons in practice.

A Context-Specific Design of an Electrosurgical Unit and Monopolar Handheld to Enhance Global Access to Surgical Care: A Design Approach Based on Contextual Factors

Abstract To comply with the large global need for surgery, surgical equipment that fits the challenging environment in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) should be designed. The aim of this study is to present a context-specific design of an electrosurgical unit (ESU) and a monopolar handheld to improve global access to surgery. This paper presents both a detailed description of electrosurgery in clinical practice in LMICs and the design of an ESU generator and monopolar handheld for this specific setting. Extensive fieldwork (by means of surveys, interviews, observations, and collection of maintenance records) was done by authors RO, KO, and LH. Feedback from users working in Kenya on the first demonstrator designs was obtained, after which the designs were adapted into conceptual prototypes. These were further evaluated by surveying respondents who attended the annual meeting of the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) in Kigali, Rwanda in December 2018. Conceptual prototypes were developed for (a) an affordable ESU that is compact and battery powered and (b) a robust reusable monopolar handheld that can be cleaned in the autoclave and by chemicals (e.g., glutaraldehyde solution). The conceptual prototypes were positively received by the 51 respondents of the survey. The findings from the field work and the feedback from users during the design phase have led to a clear understanding of the specific needs and potential solutions. The presented conceptual prototypes need to be further developed into functional prototypes, which could be implemented in Kenya and other settings for further evaluation.

Availability, procurement, training, usage, maintenance and complications of electrosurgical units and laparoscopic equipment in 12 African countries.

BackgroundStrategies are needed to increase the availability of surgical equipment in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). This study was undertaken to explore the current availability, procurement, training, usage, maintenance and complications encountered during use of electrosurgical units (ESUs) and laparoscopic equipment.MethodsA survey was conducted among surgeons attending the annual meeting of the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA) in December 2017 and the annual meeting of the Surgical Society of Kenya (SSK) in March 2018. Biomedical equipment technicians (BMETs) were surveyed and maintenance records collected in Kenya between February and March 2018.ResultsAmong 80 participants, there were 59 surgeons from 12 African countries and 21 BMETs from Kenya. Thirty‐six maintenance records were collected. ESUs were available for all COSECSA and SSK surgeons, but only 49 per cent (29 of 59) had access to working laparoscopic equipment. Reuse of disposable ESU accessories and difficulties obtaining carbon dioxide were identified. More than three‐quarters of surgeons (79 per cent) indicated that maintenance of ESUs was available, but only 59 per cent (16 of 27) confirmed maintenance of laparoscopic equipment at their centre.ConclusionDespite the availability of surgical equipment, significant gaps in access to maintenance were apparent in these LMICs, limiting implementation of open and laparoscopic surgery.

The College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa: Successes and Challenges in Standardizing Neurosurgical Training

The College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) is a regional accrediting body for general and specialty surgical training programs that has recently expanded to include neurosurgery. As neurosurgical services expand in sub-Saharan Africa, the structure of training and accreditation has become a vital issue. We review the founding and current structures of COSECSA neurosurgical training, identifying accomplishments and challenges facing the expansion of neurosurgical training in this region. The COSECSA model has succeeded in several countries to graduate qualified neurosurgeons, but challenges remain. Programs must balance the long duration of training required to promote surgical excellence against an overwhelming clinical need that seeks immediate solutions. Harnessing global collaboration, rapidly expanding local infrastructure, and a robust multinational training curriculum, COSECSA has emerged as a leader in the effort to train neurosurgeons and is anticipated to dramatically improve on the markedly unmet need for neurosurgical care in sub-Saharan Africa.

Abstracts of the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA) 19th Annual General Meeting and International Scientific Conference

Conference Abstracts

Equipment for essential surgical care in 9 countries across Africa: availability, barriers and need for novel design

Shortages of medical equipment in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs) have been found by several previous studies that assessed surgical capacity. To increase surgical capacity, there is a need to identify the availability of specific types of surgical equipment on a local, regional and national level. A survey was conducted among surgeons attending the annual meeting of the College Of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA) in December 2016. General information of the facilities, availability of surgical equipment, reasons for limited availability, daily usage of equipment and equipment that could benefit from redesign were assessed. Forty-two respondents participated in this study, representing 33 individual healthcare facilities (14 public referrals, 9 public district and 10 private (for-profit and non-profit)). The respondents worked in 9 countries in East, Central, Western and Southern Africa. A deficiency in availability of basic surgical equipment was found, especially in public district hospitals. Electrosurgical units, endoscopes, defibrillators, infusions pumps and electrocardiogram monitors were of limited availability. Reasons indicated for this limited availability were: no need, too costly, no training, no disposables and no repair. Lack of maintenance and old/overused equipment were identified as major reasons for failure of equipment. Equipment that could benefit from redesign were for example: electrosurgical units, laparoscopic equipment and theatre lights. Availability of surgical equipment should be increased, especially in public district hospitals. Novel context appropriate redesign that is adapted to fit the context in LMICs could decrease the barriers to availability and to failure of surgical equipment.

The challenges and opportunities of global neurosurgery in East Africa: the Neurosurgery Education and Development model.

The objective of this study was to describe the experience of a volunteering neurosurgeon during an 18-week stay at the Neurosurgery Education and Development (NED) Institute and to report the general situation regarding the development of neurosurgery in Zanzibar, identifying the challenges and opportunities and explaining the NED Foundation's model for safe practice and sustainability. The NED Foundation deployed the volunteer neurosurgeon coordinator (NC) for an 18-week stay at the NED Institute at the Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Stonetown, Zanzibar. The main roles of the NC were as follows: management of patients, reinforcement of weekly academic activities, coordination of international surgical camps, and identification of opportunities for improvement. The improvement opportunities were categorized as clinical, administrative, and sociocultural and were based on observations made by the NC as well as on interviews with local doctors, administrators, and government officials. During the 18-week period, the NC visited 460 patients and performed 85 surgical procedures. Four surgical camps were coordinated on-site. Academic activities were conducted weekly. The most significant challenges encountered were an intense workload, deficient infrastructure, lack of self-confidence among local physicians, deficiencies in technical support and repairs of broken equipment, and lack of guidelines. Through a series of interviews, the sociocultural factors influencing the NED Foundation's intervention were determined. Factors identified for success were the activity of neurosurgical societies in East Africa; structured pan-African neurosurgical training; the support of the Foundation for International Education in Neurological Surgery (FIENS) and the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA); motivated personnel; and the Revolutionary Government of Zanzibar's willingness to collaborate with the NED Foundation. International collaboration programs should balance local challenges and opportunities in order to effectively promote the development of neurosurgery in East Africa. Support and endorsement should be sought to harness shared resources and experience. Determining the caregiving and educational objectives within the logistic, administrative, social, and cultural framework of the target hospital is paramount to success.