College Of Family Physicians Of Canada Research Articles

Performance of generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs) in Certification Examination of the College of Family Physicians of Canada

IntroductionThe application of large language models such as generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs) has been promising in medical education, and its performance has been tested for different medical exams. This study...

Artificial intelligence for family medicine research in Canada: current state and future directions: Report of the CFPC AI Working Group.

To understand the current landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) for family medicine (FM) research in Canada, identify how the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) could support near-term positive progress in this field, and strengthen the community working in this field. Members of a scientific planning committee provided guidance alongside members of a CFPC staff advisory committee, led by the CFPC-AMS TechForward Fellow and including CFPC, FM, and AI leaders. This initiative included 2 projects. First, an environmental scan of published and gray literature on AI for FM produced between 2018 and 2022 was completed. Second, an invitational round table held in April 2022 brought together AI and FM experts and leaders to discuss priorities and to create a strategy for the future. The environmental scan identified research related to 5 major domains of application in FM (preventive care and risk profiling, physician decision support, operational efficiencies, patient self-management, and population health). Although there had been little testing or evaluation of AI-based tools in practice settings, progress since previous reviews has been made in engaging stakeholders to identify key considerations about AI for FM and opportunities in the field. The round-table discussions further emphasized barriers to and facilitators of high-quality research; they also indicated that while there is immense potential for AI to benefit FM practice, the current research trajectory needs to change, and greater support is needed to achieve these expected benefits and to avoid harm. Ten candidate action items that the CFPC could adopt to support near-term positive progress in the field were identified, some of which an AI working group has begun pursuing. Candidate action items are roughly divided into avenues where the CFPC is well-suited to take a leadership role in tackling priority issues in AI for FM research and specific activities or initiatives the CFPC could complete. Strong FM leadership is needed to advance AI research that will contribute to positive transformation in FM.

The Certificate of Added Competence credentialling program in family medicine: a descriptive survey of the family physician perspective of enhanced skill practices in Canada.

The College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) offers the Certificate of Added Competence (CAC) program to designate a family physician with enhanced skills. In 2015, the College expanded its program to introduce enhanced certification in four new domains: Palliative Care, Care of the Elderly, Sports and Exercise Medicine, and Family Practice Anesthesia. In this study, we elicited perceptions from Canadian family physicians with and without the CAC on practice impacts associated with the program. Active family physicians in Canada with and without CACs were surveyed between November 2019 to January 2020. Descriptive statistics were generated to describe the perceptions of family physicians regarding the CAC program and its impacts on practice. Respondents agreed with several benefits of the program including enhancing the capacity to deliver comprehensive care, alleviating the burden of patient travel by increasing the availability of care in rural and remote communities, and providing opportunities to engage in various collaborative care models and new leadership roles. All respondents perceived CAC holders to pursue the certificate to meet both professional interests and community needs. There is a need for strong and continued investment in systemic practice improvements that incentivize the delivery of comprehensive family medicine practice.

Are early career family physicians prepared for practice in Canada? A qualitative study

BackgroundIn Canada, the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) introduced Competency Based Medical Education to prepare and train family medicine residents to be competent to enter and adapt to the independent practice of comprehensive family medicine. Despite its implementation, the scope of practice is narrowing. This study aims to understand the degree to which early career Family Physicians (FPs) are prepared for independent practice.MethodA qualitative design was used for this study. A survey and focus groups were conducted with early-career FPs who completed residency training in Canada. The survey and focus groups examined the degree of preparedness of early career FPs in relation to 37 core professional activities identified by the CFPC’s Residency Training Profile. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were conducted.ResultsSeventy-five participants from across Canada participated in the survey, and 59 participated in the focus groups. Early career FPs reported being well prepared to provide continuous and coordinated care for patients with common presentations and deliver various services to different populations. FPs were also well prepared to manage the electronic medical record, participate in team-based care, provide regular and after-hours coverage, and assume leadership and teaching roles. However, FPs reported being less prepared for virtual care, business management, providing culturally safe care, delivering specific services in emergency care hospitals, obstetrics, self-care, engaging with the local communities, and conducting research activities.ConclusionsEarly career FPs do not feel fully prepared for practice in all 37 core activities in the Residency Training Profile. As part of the introduction of the three-year program by the CFPC, the postgraduate family medicine training should consider providing more exposure to learning opportunities and developing curricula in the areas where FPs are unprepared for practice. These changes could facilitate the production of a FP workforce better prepared to manage the dynamic and complex challenges and dilemmas faced in independent practice.

The CFPC welcomes its 2022-2023 President, Dr Christie Newton.

![Figure][1]</img> Dr Christie Newton was elected as the 69th President of the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) on November 2, 2022, at the Annual Meeting of Members. She was officially installed in the role on November 11, 2022, during Family Medicine Forum. Dr Newton was born and

Research publication in Canadian Family Physician: Challenges of a discipline and a journal.

Canadian Family Physician ( CFP ), the official publication of the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC), has a challenging mandate: to serve a broad family medicine readership. This audience includes community-based family physicians across the country who look to the journal to support

Competency based medical education (CBME) in CCFP(EM) programs.

It is postulated that implementation of Competency by Design (CBD) in Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) programs has helped enhanced skills programs in emergency medicine (CCFP(EM)) move towards a more competency-based residency. The objectives of the study were to identify major competency-based medical educational (CBME) components of CCFP(EM) programs across the country; and determine how programs are delivering these components. After a rigorous development process (expert content development, and pilot testing), a survey questionnaire was administered to all 17 CCFP(EM) program directors using a modified Dillman technique. Questions were structured and framed using the core components framework of CBME. The final survey included a total of 44 questions under six sections. There was a 100% response rate. Only 65% of programs currently map their program's curriculum to an explicit outcomes-based framework. All but one program plan to map their program's curriculum to Core Professional Activities that were released by the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) in May 2021. In 35% of programs, a curriculum is organized around developmental competencies that support resident progression. Individual coaches or a coaching team follow residents longitudinally in 65% of programs. In 81% of programs, the program meets with a resident at regular, pre-defined intervals to discuss their progression. In terms of assessment: data from direct observations are incorporated 94% of the time; 29% of programs have specific criteria for advancement; and all programs have a Competence Committee. With the introduction of CBD in RCPSC programs, 71% of program directors felt there was less understanding of the unique needs of CCFP(EM) residents. This study summarizes the current state of CBME in CCFP(EM) programs. While many components of CBME are incorporated, further development and innovation is needed to fully adapt CBME to a 1-year training program.

Pandemic reflection: Significant change is needed to tap into the power of primary care during times of crisis.

Context: As a front-line resource, primary care could function as an indispensable health system resource during pandemic crises. However, throughout COVID-19, Canada's primary care providers expressed concern over their ability to respond. This study investigates factors related to these concerns, suggesting key areas for future primary care system development. Objective: Assess specific areas where robust, well-supported primary care could contribute significantly to the health system's pandemic response, & factors that may have prevented it from doing so. Study Design: Online, self-report survey administered over 3 weeks, April-May, 2021. Survey invitations sent via email, with three reminders following initial contact. Setting or Dataset: The College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) membership list was used to reach family physicians in diverse practice settings in all Canadian provinces and territories. Population studied: All active CFPC family physician (FP) members were included. Most FPs in Canada are CFPC members; 39,991 FPs received survey invitations; 3,409 replied, for an overall response rate of 9%. Outcome Measures: Percent of FP engaged in systems level, pandemic response measures, including: 1) reporting COVID-19 cases to public health authorities, 2) identifying priority patients for vaccination, 3) participating in COVID-19 task forces, & 4) contributing to COVID-19 research/clinical studies. Results: Overall, one-third (34%) of FPs say that family practices in their region report COVID-19 cases to public health authorities. Most FPs (55%) say that their practices have not been asked to identify priority cases for COVID-19 vaccination. Less than 1-in-5 (19%) FPs have been involved in COVID-19 advisory/planning committees, task forces or groups. Very few FPs (6%) contribute to COVID-19 research/clinical studies. Half of FPs (50%) are highly concerned about the lack of clarity from government regarding FP response to the pandemic. These findings vary across jurisdictions and practice/remuneration models. Conclusions: Canada's primary care system has not been adequately engaged in important COVID-19 response measures, including monitoring viral spread in the population, pandemic planning, vaccination roll out, and therapeutic research. Practice models and remuneration arrangements are related to primary care's responsiveness to the COVID-19 pandemic,& should be considered in future primary care health system development.

The role of Canadian family physicians in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Context: In Canada, most medical care is delivered through front line, first contact primary care. As nations traverse the most significant health event in a century, it is important to understand how primary care has been engaged in the challenge. Objective: Assess the patterns of direct clinical patient care involvement of Canadian family physicians (FPs) in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic by province, age, remuneration model, and practice setting. Study Design: Online, self-report survey administered between April 7 and May 10, 2021. Survey invitations sent via email, with three reminders following initial contact. Setting or Dataset: The College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) membership list was used to reach family physicians in diverse practice settings in all Canadian provinces and territories. Population studied: All active CFPC family physician (FP) members were included. Family medicine trainees and members with primary addresses outside Canada were excluded. Most FPs in Canada are CFPC members; 39,991 FPs received survey invitations; 3,409 replied, for an overall response rate of 9%. Outcome Measures: Percent of FPs engaged in the pandemic response, including performing COVID-19 testing, administering COVID-19 vaccines, and caring for COVID-19 patients. Results: Almost all FPs (99%) were in some way involved in the COVID-19 response. Most FPs (77%) were involved in direct clinical patient care (eg vaccination, testing, and/or caring for COVID-19 patients). In particular, 54% cared for COVID-19 patients and 15% vaccinated patients at their practice. Older FPs, FPs receiving remuneration only via fee-for-service, and FPs practicing in family medicine clinics only were less likely to be involved in the COVID-19 response. The findings also vary across jurisdiction. Conclusions: While most family physicians have been involved in the COVID-19 response, discrepancies exist across jurisdiction, ages, remuneration types, and practice models. These results suggest that there were obstacles to the full involvement of Canada's primary care system in the response to the pandemic. Evidence generated by this study points to factors that could enable a more responsive future primary health care system.

Replacing high-stakes summative examinations with graduated medical licensure in Canada.

KEY POINTS The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the medical assessment system in Canada. Examinations delivered by The College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) were delayed, cancelled or adapted. As these examinations are

Education about sexual and gender minorities within Canadian emergency medicine residency programs.

The CAEP 2021 2SLGBTQIA +i panel sought whether a gap exists within Canadian emergency medicine training pertaining to sexual and gender minority communities. This panel aimed to generate practical recommendations on improving emergency medicine education about sexual and gender minorities, thereby improving access to equitable healthcare. From August 2020 to June 2021, a panel of emergency medicine practitioners, residents, students, and community representatives met monthly via videoconference. A literature review was undertaken, and three mixed methods surveys were distributed to the CAEP member list, CAEP Resident Section, College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC)iii Emergency Medicine Members Interest Group, and to emergency medicine residency program directors and their residents. Informed by the review and surveys, recommendations were drafted and refined by panel members before presentation at the 2021 CAEP Academic Symposium. A plenary was presented to symposium attendees composed of national emergency medicine community members, which reported the survey results and literature review. All attendees were divided into small groups to develop an action plan for each recommendation. The panel outlines eight recommendations for closing the curricular gap. It identifies three perceived or real barriers to the inclusion of sexual and gender minority content in emergency medicine residency curricula. It acknowledges three enabling recommendations that are beyond the scope of individual emergency medicine programs or emergency departments (EDs), that if enacted would enable the implementation of the recommendations. Each recommendation is accompanied by two action items as a guide to implementation. Each of the three barriers is accompanied by two action items that offer specific solutions to overcome these obstacles. Each enabling recommendation suggests an action that would shift emergency medicine towards sociocultural competence nationally. These recommendations set the primary steps towards closing the educational gap.

The CFPC welcomes its 2021-2022 President, Dr Brady Bouchard.

![Figure][1]</img> Dr Brady Bouchard was installed as President of the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) on November 11, 2021, at the Annual Meeting of Members during Family Medicine Forum. Dr Bouchard was born and raised in Lloydminster, Sask, and fondly recalls being surrounded by

The dementia journey survey: A community engagement approach for inclusivity in dementia care research

AbstractBackgroundApproximately 560,000 people live with dementia (PLWD) in Canada, yet research on the experiences of ethnoculturally diverse people with dementia is largely unknown. As a result, healthcare programs and services do not reflect the dementia related needs of these communities. Additionally, 60% of primary care physicians indicated feeling uncomfortable supporting patients with dementia, despite being the first point of access for additional dementia healthcare. To address these gaps, a national collaboration was developed by the Alzheimer Society of Canada (ASC) and the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) to understand more diverse experiences of PLWD with their healthcare providers.MethodUsing a mixed methods design, paper and online surveys were created for PLWD and caregivers, and online surveys were created for family physicians. CFPC registered family physicians were invited to participate through professional channels. PLWD, and caregivers were recruited through Alzheimer Society provincial chapters and community partners. To ensure inclusivity of underrepresented populations, a targeted community engagement strategy was developed to connect with members of various ethnocultural groups across Canada using a multi‐tiered selection process of cultural community‐based organizations. Qualitative analysis will include thematic analysis using a standard process to code data and generate themes. Quantitative analysis will use descriptive statistics.ResultThis survey is the first of its kind in Canada that investigates the relationships between PLWD and caregivers with their primary health providers and utilizes a defined and consistent approach to community outreach and engagement. The survey bridges the knowledge gap in dementia care research, focusing on inclusivity of ethnocultural communities which has resulted in increased uptake of the survey and will provide richer data for resource creation.ConclusionFindings from the survey will inform the ASC‐CFPC collaboration in creating resources to increase physician comfort with managing all patients with dementia. It will also guide the development of new resources and educational materials for PLWD and caregivers. The community engagement strategy will help create and strengthen community relationships with ethnoculturally diverse communities through a mutual knowledge sharing and community building.

Impacts of the Certificates of Added Competence credentialling program: a qualitative case study of enhanced-skill family medicine practice across Canada.

Background:In 2015, the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) expanded its Certificates of Added Competence (CAC) program to include enhanced-skill certification in Care of Elderly, Family Practice Anesthesia, Palliative Care, and Sports and Exercise Medicine. We aimed to describe the impact of these 4 CACs on the provision of comprehensive care in Canada, while also identifying the factors of influence that foster these impacts.Methods:Between September 2018 and June 2019, we conducted qualitative case studies of 6 family medicine practices across Canada, sampled to represent geographic, population and practice arrangement diversity. We developed a framework of relevant factors and their relations to CAC-mediated comprehensive care delivery. We took an exploratory approach to the first 4 case studies, guided by theoretical propositions based on a literature review, and the CFPC’s 4 principles of family medicine and goals for practice. The emerging theory was confirmed and adapted through the final 2 explanatory case studies. Data were obtained through semistructured qualitative interviews with enhanced-skill and generalist physicians, specialists, trainees and administrators associated with these cases. We performed a descriptive content analysis, within and across cases.Results:Interviews with 48 participants showed considerable variation in the way CACs are operationalized related to the specific domain of care, the community, relationships among practitioners, motivations of the practitioner and needs of the patient population. The presence of CAC holders in communities expands the scope of available services, reduces the need for patients to travel and encourages continuity of care; however, comprehensive care may be negatively affected when CAC holders develop enhanced-skill practices according to clinical interests rather than community needs. Factors associated with collaborative care models, practice requirements, remuneration structure, community culture and individual aspirations interact to reinforce or undermine the effectiveness of enhanced-skill practices.Interpretation:Holders of CACs have a positive impact when they work in collaborative models that align with the needs of communities and that support local generalist family physicians. Health care policies should incentivize CAC activities that contribute to planned care delivery at the practice and community levels.

Collaborative governance of postgraduate medical education: Can it be achieved?

Faced with the need to modernize and improve the postgraduate medical education experience and to maintain the high quality of physicians that Canadians expect, in 2010, four organizations –Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada (AFMC); Collège des Médecins du Québec (CMQ); College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC); and Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) formed a consortium to conduct a review of Postgraduate Medical Education (PGME) in Canada. In 2012, the Consortium published the Future of Medical Education in Canada Postgraduate (FMEC PG) project’s 10 recommendations for change in PGME. One of these recommendations was to ‘Establish Effective Collaborative Governance in PGME’. The recommendation stated- ‘Recognizing the complexity of PGME and the health delivery system within which it operates, integrate the multiple bodies (regulatory and certifying colleges, educational and healthcare institutions) that play a role in PGME into a collaborative governance structure in order to achieve efficiency, reduce redundancy, and provide clarity on strategic directions and decisions’ The purpose of this paper is to describe the creation, function and dissolution of a collaborative governance structure within the complex system of PGME and the challenges that were faced in its sustainability. The lessons learned are applicable internationally where integration of multiple organizations is being attempted. A fundamental question remains as to whether a consensus-based decision-making process can ever be achieved among organizations with overlapping mandates and in some cases, hierarchical structures?

Endorsement of clinical practice guidelines: Criteria from the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

To refine the process for endorsement of guidelines and establish the expectations of the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) regarding the quality and relevance of clinical practice guidelines targeting family physicians and their patients. Initially, a group of 6 CFPC staff and selected College members reviewed the previous process for endorsement with the aim of providing a new direction, if needed. The work was then assumed by the Guideline and Knowledge Translation Expert Working Group, a purposefully selected group of 9 family physicians from across Canada with expertise in research, evidence, guidelines, knowledge translation, and continuing professional development and education. The initial task force reviewed the endorsement process and identified areas for improvement. A draft new process and core criteria for high-quality guidelines were developed. This was approved by the CFPC board. A Guideline and Knowledge Translation Expert Working Group was then formed to further refine the process and the criteria. Multiple resources were used to inform the criteria. The Guideline and Knowledge Translation Expert Working Group will manage the endorsement process of external submitted guidelines, as well as provide high-level guidance to the CFPC regarding in-house guidelines and continuing professional development content. This article provides the expectations of the CFPC regarding clinical practice guidelines and describes in detail the process and criteria for endorsement. Key principles include family physician involvement and guideline funding unlikely to introduce bias, with most criteria falling under 4 themed areas: relation to family medicine, CFPC values, patient engagement and decision making, and scientific rigour. The Guideline and Knowledge Translation Expert Working Group will report to the CFPC board at least once a year. It is hoped that this fully transparent process and these criteria will help advance the quality and standards of clinical practice guideline production in Canada. A comprehensive but reasonable list has been provided that reflects the best standards and recommendations and is consistent with the CFPC's values while recognizing the landscape of guideline development for its national partners and colleagues. As with all processes, careful consideration and evaluation will be essential.

Seven tips for clinical supervision in the time of COVID 19.

Virtual care (VC) rapidly has become the preferred care model in family medicine settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both residents and preceptors must rapidly adapt and develop new skills to provide and supervise virtual care. The College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) created a VC supervision guide for family medicine residents and preceptors by quickly mobilizing a consensus driven approach leveraging existing CFPC educational committees, representing a broad range of teachers and residents in the country. The guide can be adapted to other settings and is provided in the hopes of being helpful to all preceptors providing VC and (virtual) supervision during the pandemic.

Process and outcome evaluation of a CBME intervention guided by program theory.

RationaleCompetency‐based medical education (CBME) has gained momentum as an improved training model, but literature on outcomes of CBME, including evaluation of implementation processes, is minimal. We present a case for the following: (a) the development of a program theory is essential prior to or in the initial stages of implementation of CBME; (b) the program theory should guide the strategies and methods for evaluation that will answer questions about anticipated and unintended outcomes; and (c) the iterative process of testing assumptions and hypotheses will lead to modifications to the program theory to inform best practices of implementing CBME.MethodsWe use the Triple C Competency‐based Curriculum as a worked example to illustrate how process and outcome evaluation, guided by a program theory, can lead to meaningful enhancement of CBME curriculum, assessment, and implementation strategies. Using a mixed methods design, the processes and outcomes of Triple C were explored through surveys, interviews, and historical document review, which captured the experiences of various stakeholders.FindingsThe theory‐led program evaluation process was able to identify areas that supported CBME implementation: the value of a strong nondirective national vertical core supporting the transformation in education, program autonomy, and adaptability to pre‐existing local context. Areas in need of improvement included the need for ongoing support from College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) and better planning for shifts in program leadership over time.ConclusionsDeliberately pairing evaluation alongside change is an important activity and, when accomplished, yields valuable information from the experiences of those implementing and experiencing a program. Evaluation and the development of an updated program theory facilitate the introduction of new changes and theories that build on these findings, which also supports the desired goal of contributing toward cumulative science rather than “reinventing the wheel.”

Health human resources for emergency medicine: a framework for the future.

In June of 2016, the Collaborative Working Group (CWG) on the Future of Emergency Medicine presented its final report at the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) annual meeting in Quebec City. The CWG report made a number of recommendations concerning physician Human Health Resource (HHR) shortfalls in emergency medicine, specific changes for both the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (FRCPC) and the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CCFP-EM) training programs, HHR needs in rural and remote hospitals, future collaboration of the CCFP-EM and FRCPC programs, and directions for future research. All recommendations were endorsed by CAEP, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC), and the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC). The CWG report was published in CJEM and has served as a basis for ongoing discussion in the emergency medicine community in Canada. The CWG identified an estimated shortfall of 478 emergency physicians in Canada in 2016, rising to 1071 by 2020 and 1518 by 2025 assuming no expansion of EM residency training capacity. In 2017, the CAEP board struck a new committee, The Future of Emergency Medicine in Canada (FEMC), to advocate with appropriate stakeholders to implement the CWG recommendations and to continue with this important work. FEMC led a workshop at CAEP 2018 in Calgary to develop a regional approach to HHR advocacy, recognizing different realities in each province and region. There was wide representation at this workshop and a rich and passionate discussion among those present. This paper represents the output of the workshop and will guide subsequent deliberations by FEMC. FEMC has set the following three goals as we work toward the overarching purpose to improve timely access to high quality emergency care: (1) to define and describe categories of emergency departments (EDs) in Canada, (2) define the full time equivalents required by category of ED in Canada, and (3) recommend the ideal combination of training and certification for emergency physicians in Canada. A fourth goal supports the other three goals: (4) urge further consideration and implementation of the CWG-EM recommendations related to coordination and optimization of the current two training programs. We believe that goals 1 and 2 can largely be accomplished by the CAEP annual meeting in 2020, and goal 3 by the CAEP annual meeting in 2021. Goal 4 is ongoing with both the RCPSC and the CFPC. We urge the EM community across Canada to engage with our committee to support improved access and EM care for all Canadians.

No. 385-Indications for Pelvic Examination.

No. 385-Indications for Pelvic Examination.