Collaborative Quality Improvement Project Research Articles

Unmasking patients' insight into SGLT2 inhibitors: A collaborative quality improvement project to enhance patient education and safety

Unmasking patients' insight into SGLT2 inhibitors: A collaborative quality improvement project to enhance patient education and safety

Reducing Postoperative CT Imaging for Children With Complicated Appendicitis: A Pediatric Surgical Quality Collaborative Quality Improvement Project

BackgroundDespite widespread initiatives to reduce ionizing radiation for appendicitis diagnosis, computed tomography (CT) scanning postoperatively remains common. The Pediatric Surgery Quality Collaborative (PSQC) aimed to identify differences between children's hospitals with high and low postoperative CT usage for complicated appendicitis. MethodsUsing National Surgery Quality Improvement Program Pediatric data from PSQC children's hospitals, we compared postoperative CT imaging for complicated appendicitis (April 2020–March 2021). Key stakeholders from 11 hospitals (5 low CT utilization, 6 high CT utilization) participated in semi-structured interviews regarding postoperative imaging. Qualitative analysis of transcripts was performed deductively and inductively based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). ResultsFive of twelve TDF domains were most prominent in influencing CT use: skills, beliefs about capabilities, intentions/goals, memory and decision processes, and environment. Children's hospitals with lower rates of postoperative CT use tended to: trust and educate the ultrasound technicians; believe US strengths outweigh weaknesses; image no sooner than 7 days postoperatively; have access to sufficient quality improvement resources; maintain trusting relationships between specialties; and prioritize radiation stewardship. ConclusionHospitals at extremes of postoperative CT use for complicated appendicitis reveal strategies for improvement, which include imaging protocol development and adherence, quality improvement resource availability, interdisciplinary collaboration, and promoting radiation stewardship. Level of EvidenceLevel V.

Motivational drivers for health professionals in a large quality improvement collaborative project in Brazil: a qualitative study

BackgroundThe success of collaborative quality improvement (QI) projects in healthcare depends on the context and engagement of health teams; however, the factors that modulate teams’ motivation to participate in these projects are still unclear. The objective of the current study was to explore the barriers to and facilitators of motivation; the perspective was health professionals in a large project aiming to implement evidence-based infection prevention practices in intensive care units of Brazilian hospitals.MethodsThis qualitative study was based on content analysis of semistructured in-depth interviews held with health professionals who participated in a collaborative QI project named “Improving patient safety on a large scale in Brazil”. In accordance with the principle of saturation, we selected a final sample of 12 hospitals located throughout the five regions of Brazil that have implemented QI; then, we conducted videoconference interviews with 28 health professionals from those hospitals. We encoded the interview data with NVivo software, and the interrelations among the data were assessed with the COM-B model.ResultsThe key barriers identified were belief that improvement increases workload, lack of knowledge about quality improvement, resistance to change, minimal involvement of physicians, lack of supplies, lack support from senior managers and work overload. The primary driver of motivation was tangible outcomes, as evidenced by a decrease in infections. Additionally, factors such as the active participation of senior managers, teamwork, learning in practice and understanding the reason for changes played significant roles in fostering motivation.ConclusionThe motivation of health professionals to participate in collaborative QI projects is driven by a variety of barriers and facilitators. The interactions between the senior manager, quality improvement teams, and healthcare professionals generate attitudes that modulate motivation. Thus, these aspects should be considered during the implementation of such projects. Future research could explore the cost-effectiveness of motivational approaches.

2015 Identifying and Managing Visual Impairment in Older Patients with Falls on a Care of the Elderly (COTE) ward

Abstract Introduction In 2019, the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) advised that all patients should have their vision screened if identified as a falls risk. Our aim was to implement a bedside visual screening test and establish an onward inpatient referral to Hospital Eye Services (HES). Method This is a collaborative Quality Improvement project involving Geriatric Medicine, HES and the Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB). A pilot study cross referenced falls admissions with previous known ophthalmic data to estimate the proportion of known vision loss in this group. In the second phase of the project, a bedside visual screening test has been introduced for all patients admitted to COTE with a fall. Patients failing the screening are reviewed by an RNIB Eye Clinic Liaison Officer (ECLO) and if necessary, a prompt inpatient HES review is arranged. Results Of 182 patients admitted following a fall, in the pilot study, 112 (61%) were known to ophthalmology previously. Of patients known to ophthalmology, 28 (25%) had vision of 6/18 or worse and would be considered to struggle with daily living tasks. 12 (10%) had a certificate of visual impairment (CVI) and 3 (3%) were eligible for CVI but had not been previously registered. One year following implementation of bedside vision testing, 287 patients had been reviewed after failing bedside screening. 97 of these had an onward referral sent or an intervention performed. The first ‘COTE ECLO’ post has been funded as a result of this work. Conclusion Assessing vision is a critical element of the assessment of patients with falls. Through collaboration with the RNIB and Ophthalmology a successful pathway has been developed to address visual impairment in this vulnerable group of patients.

Timely Assessment of Breathing-Related Distress in Community Palliative Care: A Multidisciplinary Collaborative Quality Improvement Project.

Background: Breathlessness is a common symptom for palliative patients that can cause distress and decrease function and quality of life. Palliative care services in Australia aim to routinely assess patients for breathing-related distress, but timely reassessment is not always achieved. Objective: To improve the timeliness of breathlessness reassessment in a home-based community palliative care service in New South Wales for people with moderate-to-severe breathing-related distress. Breathing-related distress was defined as a Symptom Assessment Score for "breathing problems" of four or more. Methods: This collaborative quality improvement (QI) project between SPHERE Palliative Care CAG, Stanford University mentors, and a Sydney metropolitan specialist palliative care service included a: (1) retrospective chart audit; (2) cause and effect analyses using a fishbone diagram; (3) development and implementation of key drivers and interventions; and (4) a pre-and-post evaluation of the timeliness of reassessment of breathing-related distress and changes in Symptom Assessment Scale scores for "breathing problems." Results: Key interventions included multidisciplinary education sessions to facilitate buy-in, with nurses as case managers responsible for breathlessness reassessment and documentation of scores, access and training in electronic palliative care data entry software, fortnightly monitoring and reporting of breathing-related distress scores, and development of an educational flowchart. The proportion of patients reassessed within seven days of an initial nursing assessment of moderate-to-severe breathing-related distress increased from 34% at baseline to 92% at six months. Conclusion: A local QI project increased the proportion of patients with a timely reassessment of their breathing-related distress in a community palliative care service.

Improving surgical safety checklist utilisation at 23 public health facilities in Ethiopia: a collaborative quality improvement project

BackgroundIn 2009, the WHO introduced the surgical safety checklist (SSC) as one of the interventions for improving patient safety. The systematic use of structured checklists during surgery has been shown...

In Situ Simulation and Clinical Outcomes in Infants Born Preterm

To evaluate impact of a multihospital collaborative quality improvement project implementing in situ simulation training for neonatal resuscitation on clinical outcomes for infants born preterm. Twelve neonatal intensive care units were divided into 4 cohorts; each completed a 15-month long program in a stepped wedge manner. Data from California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Infants with very low birth weight between 22 through 31weeks gestation were included. Primary outcome was survival without chronic lung disease (CLD); secondary outcomes included intubation in the delivery room, delivery room continuous positive airway pressure, hypothermia (<36°C) upon neonatal intensive care unit admission, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, and mortality before hospital discharge. A mixed effects multivariable regression model was used to assess the intervention effect. Between March 2017 and December 2020, a total of 2626 eligible very low birth weight births occurred at 12 collaborative participating sites. Rate of survival without CLD at participating sites was 74.1% in March to August 2017 and 76.0% in July to December 2020 (risk ratio 1.03; [0.94-1.12]); no significant improvement occurred during the study period for both participating and nonparticipating sites. The effect of in situ simulation on all secondary outcomes was stable. Implementation of a multihospital collaborative providing in situ training for neonatal resuscitation did not result in significant improvement in survival without CLD. Ongoing in situ simulations may have an impact on unit practice and unmeasured outcomes.

Abstract WP27: Beyond The Call: EMS Feedback And Education Improving Stroke Care

Background and Purpose: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers are an integral part of the chain of acute stroke care, stroke patient survival and improving patient outcomes. It is imperative that EMS providers have tools to make accurate critical, time-sensitive decisions. This information impacts care patients receive in the Emergency Department (ED). This collaborative quality improvement project was created to provide feedback to paramedics with the goal of continued rapid, high-quality care for stroke patients in the ED. The purpose of this project is to determine if improved assessment, documentation and information gathering in the prehospital setting decreases door-to-thrombolytic times (DTN). Methods: Collaboration with the Beverly Hills Fire Department (BHFD) educators was initiated in July of 2021. We created a feedback form which included EMS documentation elements for the paramedics to obtain. These forms were completed by BHFD educators and our team. We performed ED chart reviews to extract data correlating items such as last known well time (LKWT), witness contact information and other pertinent data. We then provided a summary of the patient’s hospital course. Forms were returned to BHFD educators who distributed them to the paramedics for feedback purposes. Data was collected and analyzed for 12 data points over three quarters (Q3 and Q4 of 2021 and Q1 of 2022). Results: Data points analyzed showed sustained improvement. Three data elements demonstrated significant improvement: documentation of LKWT (67% Q3 2021, 89% Q4 2021, 100% Q1 2022), witness contact information collected (11% Q3 2021, 46% Q4, 83% Q1 2022) and over triage reduction (80% Q3 2021, 53% Q4 2021, 50% Q1 2022). Retrospective chart review revealed that patients delivered to our ED by BHFD treated with thrombolytics during Q3 and Q4 202 and Q1 2022 had a median DTN time of 32.6 minutes. This is outstanding and well within the national stroke DTN benchmark. Conclusion: We found that feedback to the paramedics improves documentation and assessment skills. Having information we need upon the patient’s arrival to the ED expedites and improves the quality of care we provide to our patients. We will continue to track this data with hopes of including other EMS providers in our network.

Resident-Led Effort Improves Adoption of Advance Care Planning among Emergency General Surgery Patients

INTRODUCTION: Advanced Care Planning (ACP) is underused in surgery, especially among older adults undergoing high-risk operations. For patients who may permanently or temporarily lose their ability to communicate preferences, pre-operative ACP and identification of a surrogate decision-maker is often the only mechanism to guide medical decision-making. METHODS: A resident-led, collaborative (faculty, advanced practice providers [APP], medical student, and nurse) quality improvement project including education (grand rounds, case-based conferences, didactic sessions), performance measurement and financial incentives, conducted on the Emergency General Surgery (EGS) service aimed to increase use of a tailored surgical template in the ACP tab in the electronic health record (EHR). 566 patients in the baseline period (2020-2021) were compared to 423 patients in the project period (2021-2022). Residents were surveyed about barriers to adoption. RESULTS: ACP compliance increased by 8.1% (10.1% to 18.2%) with a greater increase noted in patients age 65+ (20.3% vs 34.3%). Residents and APPs completed ACP, usually by integrating into patient admission workflow (52.1% within the first 24 hours of admission). For major cases, ACP compliance rates increased by 19.7% (18.9% to 38.6%). Residents surveyed (n = 19), all of whom had an ACP conversation all recognized the importance of ACP, noted barriers, including competing clinical duties (50%), patient or family hesitancy (30%), and language barriers (15%), (Table 1). CONCLUSION: A resident-APP partnership was effective at increasing ACP adoption on an EGS service. Further study is needed to identify approaches to facilitate ACP conversations in EGS patients with limited English proficiency.Table 1

Early ACEI/ARB use and in-hospital outcomes of acute myocardial infarction patients with systolic blood pressure

BackgroundFew studies have evaluated whether acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with relatively low blood pressure benefit from early ACEI/ARB use in the era of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).ObjectivesThis study evaluated the associations of ACEI/ARB use within 24 h of admission with in-hospital outcomes among AMI patients with SBP < 100 mmHg and undergoing PCI.MethodsThis study was based on the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-ACS project, a collaborative registry and quality improvement project of the American Heart Association and the Chinese Society of Cardiology. Between November 2014 and December 2019, a total of 94,623 patients with AMI were enrolled. Of them, 4,478 AMI patients with SBP < 100 mmHg and undergoing PCI but without clinically diagnosed cardiogenic shock at admission were included. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity score-matching analysis were used to evaluate the association between early ACEI/ARB use and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), a combination of all-cause death, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest.ResultsOf AMI patients, 24.41% (n = 1,093) were prescribed ACEIs/ARBs within 24 h of admission. Patients with early ACEI/ARB use had a significantly lower rate of MACEs than those without ACEI/ARB use (1.67% vs. 3.66%, p = 0.001). In the logistic regression analysis, early ACEI/ARB use was associated with a 45% lower risk of MACEs (odds ratio: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.33–0.93; p = 0.027). Further propensity score-matching analysis still showed that patients with early ACEI/ARB use had a lower rate of MACEs (1.96% vs. 3.93%, p = 0.009).ConclusionThis study found that among AMI patients with an admission SBP < 100 mmHg undergoing PCI, early ACEI/ARB use was associated with better in-hospital outcomes. Additional studies of the early use of ACEIs/ARBs in AMI patients with relatively low blood pressure are warranted.

Eat, Sleep, Console—a Quality Improvement Project

Due to the opioid epidemic, an increasing number of infants are born with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). The aim of the interdisciplinary collaborative quality improvement project was to decrease length of stay (LOS) and need for pharmacological intervention for newborns 35 weeks or greater gestation. Before the project, newborns were treated with pharmacological therapy in a specialized nursery and average LOS was 2–3 weeks. NOWS newborns who room-in with the parent(s) need less pharmacological treatment and have decreased LOSs.

Evaluating the congenital heart assessment tool: a quality improvement project.

An early warning tool, the Congenital Heart Assessment Tool (CHAT), was designed in 2012 to support parental preparation before discharge, enhancing understanding of their infant's complex CHD, the signs of deterioration to look out for and to support decision-making at home. Acceptability and feasibility of the tool were tested during 2013-2015 in a single centre. To evaluate the wider implementation across four children's cardiac centres of the CHAT for infants with complex CHD in the community setting. A four-centre collaborative mixed-methods quality improvement project funded by The Health Foundation, during 2016-2018. A plan, do, study, act cycle of improvement was employed. This article reports on the planning phases, creation of a modified tool (CHATm); and the implementation phases, including retrospective case note review using CHATm; tabletop simulation exercise using CHATm and clinical implementation of CHATm. Key findings included the benefit of using CHATm simulation for practitioners; the effectiveness of CHATm in predicting amber and red triggers, indicating parental actions and escalation of concerns to professionals. Parents using CHATm found it enhanced knowledge in preparation for going home, supported decision-making, and discussions with health care professionals. Using the CHATm clinically identified the need to develop a structured model of assessment of parental suitability for home-monitoring programmes. A robust and nationally agreed training programme for all staff using CHATm was recommended to ensure successful and complete implementation in practice.

An improved congenital heart assessment tool: a quality improvement outcome.

CHD was the most prevalent congenital anomaly (60.9 per 10,000, 95% CI 59.0-62.8) in England in 2018, with 1767 babies born with severe cardiac defects. The 30-day survival rates for complex procedures continue to improve; however despite care advances, the early post-operative period and first year of life remain a critical time for these infants. The Congenital Heart Assessment Tool was developed to support parental decision-making, standardise care provision, improve communication, and the safety and quality of care. To further evaluate the Congenital Heart Assessment Tool. A four centre collaborative mixed-methods quality improvement project funded by The Health Foundation, involving eight phases conducted during 2016-2018. Phases six to eight (clinical simulation exercise, parent workshop, and updated tool) are reported in this paper. Four themes emerged from the clinical simulation exercise (phase six) including: improving documentation; preparation of parents; preparation of health care professionals; and communication. One main theme emerged from the parent workshop (phase seven): "what parents know versus what professionals know [about CHD]". These phases further validated the effectiveness of the CHATm in terms of triggering amber and red indicators and demonstrated parents' ability to identify deterioration in their infant's clinical condition. Recommendations arising from the quality improvement project enabled the project team to create an updated version of the Congenital Heart Assessment Tool, CHAT2.

Use of a Quality Scorecard to Enhance Quality and Safety in Community Hospital Newborn Nurseries

To implement a quality improvement (QI) scorecard as a tool for enhancing quality and safety efforts in level 1 and 2 community hospital nurseries affiliated with Nationwide Children's Hospital. A QI scorecard was developed for data collection, analytics, and reporting of neonatal quality metrics and cross-sector collaboration. Newborn characteristics were included for risk stratification, as were clinical and process measures associated with neonatal morbidity and mortality. Quality and safety activities took place in community hospital newborn nurseries in Ohio, and education was provided in both online and in-person collaborations, followed by local team sessions at partner institutions. Baseline (first 12months) and postbaseline comparisons of clinical and process measures were analyzed by logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders. In logistic regression models, at least 1 center documented improvements in each of the 4 process measures, and 3 of the 4 centers documented improvements in compliance with glucose checks obtained within 90minutesof birth among at-risk infants. Collaborative QI projects led to improvements in perinatal metrics associated with important outcomes. Formation of a center-driven QI scorecard is feasible and provides community hospitals with a framework for collecting, analyzing, and reporting neonatal QI metrics.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and In-Hospital Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and in-hospital gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) taking dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Patients and MethodsThis study is based on the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-ACS project, an ongoing collaborative registry and quality improvement project of the American Heart Association and the Chinese Society of Cardiology. A total of 25,567 patients with ACS taking DAPT from 172 hospitals from July 1, 2017, through December 31, 2018, were included. Multivariable Cox regression and propensity score–matched analyses were used to evaluate the association between PPI use and in-hospital GI bleeding. ResultsOf these patients with ACS, 63.9% (n=16,332) were prescribed PPIs within 24 hours of admission. Patients using PPIs had a higher rate of GI bleeding compared with those not using PPIs (1.0% vs 0.5%; P<.001). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, early PPI use was associated with a 58% higher risk of GI bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.18; P=.005). Further propensity score matching attenuated the association but still showed that patients using PPIs had a higher rate of GI bleeding (0.8% vs 0.6%; P=.04). ConclusionIn China, PPIs are widely used within 24 hours of admission in patients with ACS taking DAPT. An increased risk of GI bleeding is observed in inpatients with early PPI use. Randomized trials on early use of PPIs in patients with ACS receiving DAPT are warranted. Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02306616.

Improving Mortality Through a Multihospital, Collaborative Quality Improvement Project.

Improving hospital mortality is a key focus of quality and safety efforts at both the local and national level. Structured interventions can assist organizations in determining whether interventional efforts have led to sustained improvement. The PARiHS framework (Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services) can assist organizations in implementing research into practice. This study investigates the use of the PARiHS framework in implementing a multihospital quality improvement project aimed at improving observed-to-expected mortality as measured by Vizient's Clinical Data Base (CDB). Structured interventions during the study period included mortality reviews, clinical documentation improvement opportunities, educational webinars, training and support in the use of CDB to explore ongoing opportunities for mortality improvement and quarterly reports to each participating hospital's leadership team on their performance. Data were gathered from an improvement collaborative in the Upper Midwest, which comprised 34 hospitals, of which 17 participated in the intervention. Measurement occurred from Quarter 4 2016 through Quarter 3 2020 and consisted of a preintervention, intervention, and postintervention period. Although both participating and nonparticipating hospitals achieved a significant reduction in their mortality observed-to-expected ratio from the preintervention period through the postintervention period, the participating hospitals achieved a greater reduction in their observed-to-expected mortality ratio ( P < 0.0004). In addition, the participating hospitals achieved a relative 21% improvement in the mortality domain rank of the Vizient Quality & Accountability Study.

6 The Value of Ultrasound in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis

Abstract Aim The diagnosis of acute appendicitis relies on a thorough history and examination and can often be challenging. Ultrasound is widely considered to be the most appropriate first line investigation; however non-diagnostic ultrasounds are not uncommon and do lead to delays in diagnosis and/or definitive treatment by creating a need for further clinical assessment. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound diagnosis of appendicitis in patient treated at Doncaster Royal Infirmary, and to determine the local negative appendicectomy rate. Method This was a retrospective analysis of 99 patients undergoing appendicectomy, with a prior ultrasound abdomen within one week of the procedure being undertaken. Data was collected from review of patient's hospital medical records (discharge summaries, clinic letters, PACs). Results 99 patient aged 8-76 years were studied. Male to female ratios was 3:1. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound was 16% (95% CI - 7% to 29%) and 96% (95% CI - 86% to 99%) respectively with PPV of 80% and NPV of 52%. The accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis was found to be 55% (95% CI 44% to 65%). The negative appendicectomy rate was 48%. Conclusions From our study, ultrasound cannot reliably identify nor exclude appendicitis. Less than 16% of patients who had proven appendicitis (positive histology) had scans that indicated. Almost 50% of the normal/indeterminate scans were false negatives. Furthermore, 20% of positive ultrasound reports were false positives. A collaborative quality improvement project with the imaging department is planned to address these findings.

The Pediatric Palliative Improvement Network: A national Healthcare Learning Collaborative

Context and objectivesAlthough multiple national organizations have created consensus guidelines and metrics for pediatric palliative care (PPC), standardized implementation and measurement has been challenging. In 2016, 6 PPC physician-experts in program development and quality improvement (QI) formed a healthcare learning collaborative network entitled the Pediatric Palliative Improvement Network (PPIN). MethodsThe primary drivers identified were 1) Feasibility of a national learning network demonstrated through the completion of one small QI project, 2) Standard education in QI methodology and 3) Salient pediatric palliative care operational, clinical and satisfaction metrics clearly defined. ResultsPPIN now includes146 members representing 51 organizations. In 2019 the group completed a national collaborative QI project focused on pain assessment at the time of initial consult, demonstrating a national increase in pain assessment from 75.8% to >90% over 12 months. PPIN has hosted two national QI workshops training more than 50 PPC clinicians in QI, with a 2-hour webinar provided in 2020 due to COVID. Monthly calls since 2017 provide QI methods “refreshers”, share local works in progress, and provide infrastructure for future collaborative projects. ConclusionsPPIN has become a sustainable organization which improves the quality of PPC through focus on national QI methods training, successful collaborative projects, and the creation of a learning and peer support community with regular calls. With the advent of the Palliative Care Quality Collaborative in 2020, PPIN provides critical educational and organizational infrastructure to inform ongoing quality efforts in PPC, now and in the future.

Reducing emergency department visits in patients with deep vein thrombosis: introducing a standardised outpatient treatment pathway

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an acute medical condition that requires urgent diagnosis and treatment to prevent significant morbidity and mortality. Patients with DVT frequently present to the emergency department...

American College of Cardiology Body Mass Index Counseling Quality Improvement Initiative.

Overweight/obesity, prevalent cardiovascular risk factors in children, can be associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes in children with heart disease. The American College of Cardiology (ACC) developed quality metrics including a BMI metric related to identifying and counseling overweight and obese children presenting to cardiology clinics. This metric was used for a multicenter collaborative learning Quality improvement (QI) Project through the ACC Quality Network (QNet). Our aim was to increase the percentage of children between ages 3 and 18years presenting to cardiology clinics at participating centers with BMI > 85th percentile who received appropriate counseling. Participating centers submitted data quarterly to QNet for a sample of patients who received counseling. A Key Driver Diagram was created to help teams drive improvement. Individual centers customized interventions and participated in network-wide educational learning sessions about QI and shared experience. Statistical process control charts were used. From 04/01/2017 to 09/30/2019, 27,511 patient visits were included. Among 32 participating centers, overall counseling rate was 54%. The BMI counseling rate increased from 25% in 2017Q2 to 54% in 2019Q3. There was a wide variation from 10 to 100% in the performance of individual centers. The overall rate of identification and counseling of overweight and obese children presenting to ambulatory cardiology clinics in participating centers is low. There is wide variation in the performance of centers, providing an opportunity for improvement. Using this multicenter learning approach, individual centers have demonstrated improvement. This demonstrates that collaborative learning approaches in QI can increase implementation of the metric.