Collaborative Care Model Research Articles

Collaborative Care to Improve Quality of Life for Anxiety and Depression in Posttraumatic Epilepsy (CoCarePTE): Protocol for a Randomized Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Anxiety and depression in people with epilepsy are common and associated with poor outcomes; yet, they often go untreated due to poor mental health specialist access. Collaborative care is an integrated care model with a strong evidence base in primary care and medical settings, but it has not been evaluated in neurology clinics. Evaluating implementation outcomes when translating evidence-based interventions to new clinical settings to inform future scaling and incorporation into real-world practice is important. The Collaborative Care for Posttraumatic Epilepsy (CoCarePTE) trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness (improvement in emotional quality of life) and implementation of a collaborative care intervention for people with anxiety or depressive symptoms and posttraumatic epilepsy. CoCarePTE is a 2-site, randomized, single-blind, hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial that will randomize 60 adults to receive either neurology-based collaborative care or usual care. Adults receiving neurological care at participating centers with anxiety or depressive symptoms and a history of at least mild traumatic brain injury before epilepsy onset will be enrolled. The collaborative care intervention is a 24-week stepped-care model with video or telephone calls every 2 weeks by a care manager for measurement-based anxiety and depression care, seizure care monitoring, and brief therapy intervention delivery. This is supplemented by antidepressant prescribing recommendations by psychiatrists for neurologists via case conferences and care manager-facilitated team communication. In step 2 of the intervention, individuals with <50% symptom reduction by 10 weeks will receive an added 8-session remote cognitive behavioral therapy program. The study is powered to detect a moderate improvement in emotional quality of life. As a hybrid type 1 trial, effectiveness is the primary focus, with the primary outcome being a change in emotional quality of life at 6 months in the intervention group compared to control. Secondary effectiveness outcomes are 6-month changes in depression, anxiety, and overall quality of life. Implementation outcomes, including fidelity, acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness, are evaluated before implementation and at 3 months. The primary effectiveness analysis will compare changes in emotional quality of life scores from baseline to 6 months between the intervention and control arms using multiple linear regression modeling, adjusting for study site and using an intent-to-treat approach. Enrollment commenced in 2023, with modifications in the inclusion and exclusion made after the first 6 enrollees due to slow recruitment. Enrollment is expected to continue at least into early 2025. The CoCarePTE trial is novel in its use of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design to evaluate an evidence-based mental health intervention in epilepsy, and by incorporating seizure care into a collaborative care model. If a significant improvement in emotional quality of life is found in the intervention group compared to usual care, this would support next step scaling or clinical implementation. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05353452; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05353452. DERR1-10.2196/59329.

Formative qualitative research to guide implementation of the Collaborative Care Model in a low-barrier HIV clinic

ABSTRACT Integrated behavioral healthcare interventions have increased access to care for people with behavioral health conditions in primary care settings. However, they have not been widely implemented in low-barrier HIV care settings where undertreated behavioral health needs remain high. We conducted a formative qualitative evaluation, using in-depth interviews with purposively selected stakeholders (n = 13) and patients (n = 16), to identify anticipated barriers and facilitators to integrating care for depression and opioid use disorder for people with HIV via the Collaborative Care Model at a low-barrier HIV clinic. Patients and stakeholders expressed their enthusiasm for the Collaborative Care Model based on its perceived relative advantage over the standard of care referral system. Availability of resources, practical concerns about perceived fit with low-barrier HIV care, and anticipated suitability given other behavioral health comorbidities and patients’ complex socioeconomic needs partially tempered stakeholder perceptions of appropriateness for the Collaborative Care Model. Patients and service delivery stakeholders were receptive to the Collaborative Care Model, but felt it was moderately appropriate in the context of low-barrier HIV care, which necessitated key adaptations to core model components to improve its contextual fit.

Impact of Collaborative Nursing Care on Health Outcomes of Mental Health Day Hospital Users: A Mixed Methods Study.

Given that recovery-oriented care focuses on empowering individuals with mental health challenges, collaborative care can be an effective tool for nurses in mental health day hospitals. To deepen knowledge about the impact of collaborative nursing care for improving health outcomes of mental health day hospital users. A sequential and transformative mixed methods study was designed. In the first phase of this mixed methods study, quantitative data were collected from 144 users of mental health day hospitals. In phase two, a group of users underwent an intervention based on collaborative nursing care, through participatory action research, and qualitative data were collected. Finally, quantitative data were again collected from all users. The users who participated in the intervention group improved quantitatively in terms of the quality of the therapeutic relationship. They also improved at different stages of the recovery process, thus the qualitative results confirmed that collaborative nursing care was an essential component in their recovery process. The findings highlight the critical role of collaborative nursing care in health outcomes. The therapeutic relationship was identified as a key factor in facilitating patient empowerment. The study supports implementing collaborative nursing care models in mental health settings to enhance patient outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04814576.

Empowering primary care physicians in child and adolescent psychiatry: a needs assessment on collaborative care in Dubai

BackgroundChild and adolescent psychiatric disorders pose significant public health concerns necessitating prompt intervention. Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a critical role as initial points of contact, facilitating early detection, management, and referral of these conditions. In Dubai, integrating mental health services into primary care faces unique challenges, highlighting the need for systemic reforms and enhanced PCP training.ObjectiveThis study investigated perceptions, barriers, and systemic challenges encountered by PCPs in managing child and adolescent psychiatric conditions in Dubai’s primary care setting. It also assessed family physicians’ involvement and preparedness in this domain.MethodsUsing a mixed-methods approach, we conducted a survey among family physicians in Dubai Health facilities and analyzed patient data from family medicine clinics. The survey evaluated formal training, preparedness, encounter frequency, and referral patterns for psychiatric care in young patients. Qualitative insights from open-ended survey questions provided additional understanding of specific challenges.ResultsFindings revealed significant gaps in formal training, with only 33.3% of respondents trained in child and adolescent psychiatry during medical education, and 21.1% participating in Continuing Medical Education (CME). A majority (54.4%) of PCPs felt unprepared to manage psychiatric care in young patients. Patient data analysis showed a predominance of male patients (59.9%) and identified Autism Spectrum Disorder (43.1%) as the most common condition, emphasizing the reliance on specialized care through a high referral rate (63.1%). Major barriers included time constraints, limited psychiatric knowledge, resistance to mental health services, systemic and structural issues, communication challenges, and resource shortages.ConclusionEnhanced training and systemic reforms are urgently needed to integrate mental health services effectively into Dubai’s primary care. Implementing structured collaborative care models, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and addressing systemic barriers are crucial for improving child and adolescent psychiatric condition management. These initiatives promise better patient outcomes and more efficient healthcare resource utilization.

Interprofessional Education Simulation Project Using the Collaborative Care Model.

Integrated behavioral health care (IBH), a team-based approach to care, involves behavioral health providers (BHP) to be utilized in primary care settings. Unfortunately, many BHP and primary care advanced practice nursing students do not receive IBH content in their educational curriculum. This article describes an innovative interprofessional simulation project (ISP) in a virtual IBH setting with primary care nurse practitioner and master's level counseling students. The ISP involved students role-playing using case studies while enacting the roles exemplified in the Collaborative Care model (CoCM). Interprofessional faculty collaborated in developing the project and training facilitators and interprofessional students. Of the students and faculty who completed a postsurvey, 87.7% reported an increase in preparedness in learning the CoCM, and 92.6% responded the preparation time for the project was "appropriate." The ISP project resulted in high satisfaction and perceived increased preparedness for students and faculty to practice and teach IBH. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.].

Impact of Surgeon-Radiation Oncology Dyads in Oral Cavity Cancer Outcomes.

Multidisciplinary care is paramount in patient-specific decision making, especially as pertaining to oral cavity squamous cell cancer (OCSCC) treatment. Protracted surgery-postoperative-radiation (S-PORT) has a detrimental impact on OCSCC patients' outcomes. This study examined the impact of surgeon-radiation oncologist dyads on the treatment of OCSCC, focusing on S-PORT interval and disease specific outcomes. All OCSCC patients treated in a tertiary cancer center between 2009 to 2017 were included. Patients were categorized into "dyad" and "nondyad" groups defined as whether they were treated by a paired surgeon-radiation oncology team with joint multidisciplinary clinic or shared >30% patient volumes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify factors associated with a prolonged S-PORT time interval (≥8 weeks). Overall survival and locoregional recurrence were estimated and compared. A total of 444 OCSCC were eligible. Treatment by a dyad was significantly less likely associated with S-PORT ≥ 8 weeks (odds ratio [OR]unadjusted: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.96; p = 0.03). Obtaining pre-operative radiation oncology consultation also decreased the S-PORT interval. Advanced T-category and the need for free tissue flap reconstruction increased the likelihood of prolonged S-PORT on univariate but not multivariate analysis. No significant differences were observed in overall survival or locoregional recurrence by dyad status nor S-PORT (p > 0.05). Surgeon-radiation oncology dyads significantly minimized time from surgery to postoperative radiation in OCSCC. While improvement in overall survival or locoregional recurrence was not observed, these findings support close knit collaborative multidisciplinary treatment care models, including dyad-based care.

A controlled study: Evaluating the clinical impact of a nurse-centred multidisciplinary hospice care model on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with advanced malignant tumours.

To explore the clinical effect of a nurse-centred multidisciplinary collaborative hospice care model in patients with advanced malignant tumours. A total of 30 patients with advanced malignant tumours were hospitalised and randomly divided into a study group and a control group, each consisting of 15 cases. The study group received nurse-led multidisciplinary collaborative hospice care, whereas the control group underwent high-quality nursing intervention. Variables such as the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) score, self-rating depression scale (SDS) score, quality of life scale (EORTC QLQ-C30) score, patient happiness, and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Post-intervention, the SAS and SDS scores in the study group were lower than those in the control group (p < 0.01). The overall quality of life score of the study group was higher than that of the control group (p < 0.01). The Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness scores in the study group also surpassed those of the control group (p < 0.01). Additionally, nursing satisfaction in the study group exceeded that of the control group (p = 0.027). The nurse-led multidisciplinary collaborative hospice care model substantially alleviated negative emotions among patients, effectively improved their quality of life and happiness, and garnered positive evaluations of nursing satisfaction.

Psychiatric Health, Life Skills, and Opportunities for Wellness Program: Addressing psychiatric need through integrated consultation, collaboration, and brief episodes of care.

Integrated behavioral health programs bring strong benefits to patients and health organizations including reductions in overall costs. However, obstacles to funding prevent the implementation and maintenance of these programs across the country. The Psychiatric Health, Life Skills and Opportunities for Wellness (PHLOW) Program is based on the collaborative care model and seeks to provide psychiatric care through an integrated model that is financially sustainable for the organization. This pilot observational study included patients who received psychiatric care indirectly via consultations with primary care providers and directly through brief episodes of care. Patient outcomes were demonstrated by score changes on the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 before and after participation in brief episodes of care. Overall cost of care savings was demonstrated through change over time in risk-adjusted per-member-per-month. Patients participating in the PHLOW program showed potential drops in anxiety and depression ratings, coinciding with a reduction in mental health claims. In addition, participation in the program involved a small number of patient visits and prevented referrals to long-term psychiatry, preserving access for higher acuity presentations. This demonstration of the value of the PHLOW program has led to additional financial support of the program through the primary regional Medicaid payor, enhancing sustainability, and potentially modeling a collaboration that may be feasible for other organizations implementing integrated behavioral health programs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Feasibility of a nurse-led, mHealth-assisted, and team-based collaborative care model for heart failure care in India: Findings from a multi-stakeholder qualitative study

Background Heart failure (HF) management is often challenging due to poor adherence to GDMT and self-care. Continuous monitoring of patients by a dedicated care manager may enhance adherence to self-care and treatment and prevent hospitalisations. For the adoption and acceptance of a collaborative care model (CCM) for HF management in Indian settings, understanding the perspectives of all stakeholders regarding its various components and feasibility is needed. Therefore, we aimed to obtain perceptions of potential challenges to care and suggestions on multiple components of the proposed CCM in managing HF and its feasibility. Methods In-depth interviews were done among HF patients, caregivers, nurses, and cardiologists from private, co-operative, and public sector tertiary care hospital settings that cater to HF patients in Kerala, India. An in-depth interview guide was used to elicit the data. Data were analysed using Python QualCoder version 2.2. We used a framework method for the analysis of data. Results A total of 22 in-depth interviews were conducted. We found that the existing care for HF in many settings was inadequate for continuous engagement with the patients. Non-adherence to treatment and other self-care measures, was noted as a major challenge to HF care. Healthcare providers and patients felt nurses were better at leading collaborative care. However, various barriers, including technical and technological, and the apprehensions of nurses in leading the CCM were identified. The stakeholders also identified the mHealth-assisted CCM as a potential tool to save money. The stakeholders also appreciated the role of nurses in creating confidence in patients. Conclusions A nurse-led, mHealth-assisted, and team-based collaborative care was recognised as an excellent step to improve patient adherence. Effective implementation of it could reduce hospitalisations and improve patients' ability to manage their HF symptoms.

Delays in bipolar depression treatment in primary care vs. integrated behavioral health and specialty care

IntroductionWhile bipolar disorder is not uncommon in primary care, collaborative care models for bipolar depression treatment are underdeveloped. Our aim was to compare initial pharmacological treatment patterns for an episode of bipolar depression in different care models, namely primary care (PC), integrated behavioral health (IBH), and mood specialty clinic (SC). MethodsA retrospective study of adults diagnosed with bipolar disorder who received outpatient care in 2020 was completed. Depressive episodes were captured based on DSM-5 criteria, ICD codes, or de novo emergent symptom burden (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). Pharmacological strategies were classified as 1) continuation of current regimen, 2) dose increase or 3) augmentation 4) switch to monotherapy or 5) a combination of more than two different strategies. Logistic regression was applied. ResultsA total of 217 encounters (PC = 32, IBH = 53, SC = 132) representing 186 unique patients were identified. PC was significantly more likely to continue the current regimen, while combination strategies were significantly more likely recommended in IBH and SC. Mood stabilizers were significantly more utilized in IBH and SC. There were no significant group differences in antidepressant use. LimitationsRetrospective study design at a single site. ConclusionsThis study provides evidence of delays in depression care in bipolar disorder. This is the first study to compare treatment recommendations for bipolar depression in different clinical settings. Future studies are encouraged to better understand this gap and to guide future clinical practice, regardless of care model, emphasizing the potential benefits of decision support tools and collaborative care models tailored for bipolar depression.

'Whatever the GP says, is what I'll do'-A qualitative study of patient perspectives in accessing primary eye care for type 2 diabetes.

To investigate the perspectives of people accessing a general medical practitioner (GP)-optometry model of collaborative care that was established to increase access to diabetes eye care. Qualitative study of patient barriers and facilitators to accessing primary diabetes eye care located in a metropolitan area in Australia. One-on-one interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed using a determinant framework on patient-centred access to health care. Twenty-four people with type 2 diabetes, including 15 males and 9 females, who accessed the service between September 2021 and June 2022 agreed to participate. Mean (SD) age of the participants was 52 (12) years and 50% had been diagnosed with diabetes for <2 years. Facilitators to accessing diabetes eye care included a referral from a GP or GP nurse, fee-free consultations, availability of after-hours appointments and short waiting times. Barriers to access included perceived out-of-pocket costs, competing responsibilities and lack of awareness of diabetic retinopathy screening recommendations. Considering diabetic retinopathy may present asymptomatically, primary health practitioners (optometrists and GPs) are well positioned to raise patient awareness of the importance of routine eye examinations. In Australia, access to routine screening could be facilitated by fee-free eye checks and personalised text message reminders implemented at a health system level.

Association Between Antepartum Admission and Postpartum Depressive Symptoms: Short Title: Antepartum Hospital Admission and Postpartum Depressive Symptoms

BackgroundPostpartum depression affects 14% of pregnant individuals and is a leading cause of preventable maternal mortality. Complications of pregnancy, such as preterm labor or pre-eclampsia, may require hospitalization for close monitoring and management. The impact of an antenatal hospitalization during pregnancy on postnatal depression remains understudied. ObjectiveTo evaluate whether hospital admission during pregnancy was associated with postpartum depressive symptoms in individuals who were enrolled in a collaborative care model and to evaluate whether enrollment in the collaborative care model during pregnancy mitigated this association. Study DesignThis secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study included perinatal people enrolled in a collaborative care model at a quaternary academic center between 2017-2021. The primary outcome was presence of moderately severe or severe postpartum depressive symptoms at 6 weeks postpartum defined as a score of 15 or greater on a PHQ-9. The prevalence of symptoms of this severity was compared between those who experienced an antepartum hospitalization and those who did not using bivariable and multivariable analyses. A Breslow Day test was used to evaluate whether any observed association between antepartum hospitalization and postpartum depressive symptoms differed based on timing of enrollment in the collaborative care model. ResultsDuring the study period, 1897 individuals met inclusion criteria. Of these, 162 (8.5%) were admitted to the hospital during pregnancy. Of those with an antepartum hospitalization, 20 (12.4%) developed moderately severe to severe postpartum depressive symptoms compared to 136 (7.8%) of those who were not hospitalized (p=0.046). After adjustment for confounders identified through use of a directed acyclic graph, this difference did not persist in multivariable analysis (aOR 1.55, 95% CI [0.87-2.75]). A Breslow Day test demonstrated heterogeneity across enrollment timing, so subgroup analyses were performed for those enrolled during pregnancy (n=930) vs postpartum (n=967). Hospital admission was associated with higher rates of moderately severe to severe postpartum depressive symptoms in those enrolled in the collaborative care model postpartum (19.7% vs 10.6%, p=0.015, aOR 2.25, 95% CI [1.07-4.71]), but not those enrolled antenatally (5.8% vs 5.0%, p=0.735, aOR 1.09, 95% CI [0.38-3.19]). ConclusionsAntepartum hospital admission was associated with higher rates of moderately severe to severe depressive symptoms. This association did not exist among individuals enrolled in collaborative care model during pregnancy, suggesting a potential protective effect afforded by engagement in a mental health support programming.

Predictors of symptom change in the mental health of refugees and asylum seekers (MEHIRA) study examining the effects of a stepped and collaborative care model – A multicentered rater-blinded randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPredictors of symptom improvement are an essential starting point for tailoring psychological treatments to each individual and, in turn, increasing treatment efficacy overall. However, such research regarding refugees/asylum seekers from Arabic-/Farsi-speaking countries is lacking. The current study aimed to characterize predictors for symptom improvement in the Mental Health in Refugees and Asylum Seekers (MEHIRA) study, one of the most extensive multicentered controlled trials on a nationwide stepped and collaborative care model compared to routine German mental health care. MethodsVariables characterizing symptom change were chosen using backward elimination and inserted into logistic regression models for two depression endpoints, namely the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). ResultsSix variables were found to be at least marginally significantly associated with symptom decrease in both outcomes: baseline depressive symptom load, comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder, identifying as a refugee, years of schooling, physical health, and post-migration social status difference. Additionally, psychological health and resilience were marginally significant for one of the models. LimitationsSome predictor constructs - such as social support - were not adequately measured to replicate previous findings. Additionally, the study was underpowered for symptom change prediction of individual treatments beyond the group intervention. ConclusionsThese outcomes indicate that trauma-related elements as well as content on refugee identity and post-migration social status changes should be included in depression interventions for refugees. Further, recommendations for future outcome prediction studies are made.

Effectiveness of a task-sharing collaborative care model for the detection and management of depression among adults receiving antiretroviral therapy in primary care facilities in South Africa: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

BackgroundHIV is characterised by high rates of comorbidity with mental health conditions including depression, as such, the detection and treatment of comorbid depression is critical to achieve viral load suppression. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a collaborative care intervention for depression among adults with comorbid depression symptoms receiving ART in primary health care (PHC) facilities. MethodsWe conducted a pragmatic cluster-randomised trial in 40 clinics in the North West province of South Africa. PHC clinics were stratified by sub-district and randomised in a 1:1 ratio. Participants were ≥ 18 years, receiving ART, and had depression symptoms indicated by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score ≥ 9. Intervention clinics received: i) supplementary mental health training and clinical communication skills for PHC nurses; ii) workshops for PHC doctors on treating depression; and iii) lay counselling services. Using mixed effects regression models, we assessed co-primary outcomes of PHQ-9 response at 6 months (≥50 % reduction in baseline PHQ-9 score) and viral load suppression at 12 months (viral load<1000 copies/mL). ResultsThe intervention had no effect in PHQ-9 response (49 % vs 57 %, risk difference (RD) = −0.08, 95 % CI = -0.19; 0.03, p = 0.184) or viral load suppression (85 % vs 84 %, RD = 0.02, 95 % CI = −0.01; 0.04, p = 0.125). Nurses referred 4298 clinic patients to counsellors, however, only 66/1008 (7 %) of intervention arm participants were referred to counsellors at any point during the study. LimitationsThe highly pragmatic approach of this trial limited exposure to the counselling component of the intervention and referral to doctors for initiation of antidepressant treatment was extremely low. ConclusionThe trial showed no effect of a district-based intervention to strengthen collaborative care for depression. The trial revealed the extent of the treatment gap in the context of scaling up mental health services. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02407691); Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (201504001078347).

Identifying predictors of malingering in psychiatric emergency room settings and evaluating intervention strategies to reduce unnecessary er utilization. Literature review

Malingering in psychiatric emergency room (ER) settings presents a significant challenge, leading to unnecessary healthcare resource utilization and potentially compromising patient care. This literature review examines predictors of malingering and evaluates intervention strategies aimed at reducing unnecessary ER visits. The review identifies a range of predictors, including demographic factors, clinical presentations, historical elements, and motivational aspects, that may indicate malingering. Tools such as structured interviews, validity scales, and behavioral observations are highlighted for their effectiveness in identifying malingering behaviors in psychiatric ERs. The review also explores various intervention strategies, including early identification protocols, staff training programs, and collaborative care models, which have shown promise in mitigating the impact of malingering on healthcare systems. These strategies are important in ensuring that resources are appropriately allocated while maintaining high standards of patient care. However, ethical considerations, particularly the balance between detecting malingering and providing genuine patient care, remain critical challenges. Addressing these issues is essential for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of emergency psychiatric care and ensuring that patients receive appropriate and timely care.

Collaborative care models in adult congenital heart disease transplant.

While multidisciplinary collaboration is a tenant of quality heart failure care and critical to the success of transplant programs, this essay challenges the temptation to shoehorn adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients into preexisting processes and paradigms. We explore the development of more relevant models, purposefully designed to improve ACHD transplant volumes and outcomes. Globally, the rapid acceleration of ACHD patients living with and dying from HF stands in stark contrast to their access to transplant. Inferior early outcomes after ACHD transplant remain an undeniable barrier. And yet while all large registry datasets attest to this statistic, a few centers have achieved results comparable to those in acquired heart disease. This despite increases in both ACHD candidate complexity and referrals for Fontan Circulatory Failure. Perhaps something in their approach to care delivery is key?. Alone, neither ACHD nor transplant programs can provide optimal management of HF in ACHD. A siloed approach is similarly inadequate. Building new ACHD-HF-Transplant teams, centered on the patient and supplemented by ad hoc expert partnerships, is an exciting approach that can improve outcomes, create a high-quality training environment, and in our experience, is a truly rewarding way of working together.

Perspectives on the Practice of Collaborative Care: Topical Themes and Future Directions From the Lens of a Collaborative Care Child Psychiatrist.

The increasing shortage of psychiatrists in the workforce is a well-documented and alarming trend. In light of this workforce shortage, psychiatrists bear a professional and ethical responsibility to identify strategies to increase access to mental health treatment and thereby reduce the impact of the psychiatrist shortage on patients and on the greater health system. One such strategy is the collaborative care model (CoCM), which has demonstrated efficacy in the mental health treatment of both pediatric and adult populations. In this article, the CoCM is presented as one effective strategy to address the behavioral workforce shortage. Current themes observed from the clinical practice of psychiatric collaborative care in a pediatric collaborative care setting are discussed with contemplation of future directions.

Enhancing Patient-Centered Care in Nigeria: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions

Patient-Centered Care (PCC) is a healthcare approach that prioritizes the needs, preferences, and values of patients, aiming to enhance the overall quality of care by actively involving patients in their healthcare decisions. In Nigeria, the implementation of PCC faces significant challenges due to socioeconomic disparities, cultural influences, resource limitations, and infrastructural constraints. Despite these obstacles, there are substantial opportunities to improve Nigeria’s healthcare system through the integration of PCC principles. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state of PCC in Nigeria, examining the healthcare system’s structure, successful PCC models, and the barriers hindering its widespread adoption. The review also explores strategies for enhancing PCC, including community engagement, technological innovations, and collaborative care models, and highlights the impact of PCC on health outcomes, such as improved patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness. Additionally, the review discusses the critical role of policy and governance in promoting PCC, offering insights from international experiences and presenting case studies that illustrate the successes and challenges of implementing PCC in Nigeria. By addressing these key aspects, the review outlines a roadmap for advancing PCC in Nigeria, emphasizing the need for supportive policies, capacity building, and continuous evaluation to align the healthcare system with global standards and improve patient outcomes. Keywords Patient-Centered Care, Nigeria, Challenges, Opportunities, Future Directions

Collaborating to heal addiction and mental health in primary care (CHAMP): A protocol for a hybrid type 2a trial

BackgroundThe gold-standard treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) is medication for OUD (MOUD). However, less than a quarter of people with OUD initiate MOUD. Expanding the Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) to include primary care patients with OUD could improve access to and initiation of MOUD. This paper presents the methods and baseline sample characteristics of a Hybrid Type 2a trial comparing the effectiveness of CoCM for OUD and co-occurring mental health symptoms (MHS) to CoCM for MHS only. Method42 primary care clinics were cluster randomized and 254 primary care patients with OUD and elevated MHS were enrolled. Recruitment was terminated early by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board for futility. Participants completed research assessments at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The multiple primary outcomes were past-month number of days of nonmedical opioid use and SF12 Mental Health Component Summary (MCS) scores. ResultsMCS scores were over a standard deviation below the national mean (M = 34.5). Nearly half (47.6 %) of participants had previously overdosed in their lifetimes. Three quarters (76.0 %) were already being prescribed MOUD at baseline, only 30.4 % reported non-medical use of opioids, and only 33.9 % reported being bothered by opioid cravings. ConclusionThe unexpectedly high proportion of enrollees already prescribed MOUD at baseline indicates that most patients were in the maintenance rather than acute phase of treatment. Challenges identifying and enrolling patients in the acute phase of OUD treatment implies that intervention effectiveness will depend on its success preventing the discontinuation of MOUD rather than initiating MOUD.

Utilization of Traditional Healing Practices for Cancer Treatment: Benefits, Risks, and Integration with Modern Medicine

Traditional healing practices in Africa, characterized by the use of locally available plants, minerals, and spiritual rituals, have historically played a significant role in managing diseases, including cancer. Despite the overshadowing effect of Western medicine during the colonial period, traditional practices continue to be integral to many communities, providing culturally relevant and accessible treatments. This review explores the utilization of traditional healing practices in cancer treatment, focusing on the benefits, risks, and integration with modern medicine. Traditional cancer treatments, including herbal remedies, spiritual interventions, and physical therapies, offer potential benefits like improved symptom management and emotional support. However, challenges like lack of standardization, scientific validation, and potential interactions with conventional treatments pose significant risks. The integration of traditional and modern medical approaches is emerging as a trend, aiming to improve treatment outcomes and patient quality of life. This requires careful consideration of safety, efficacy, and standardization. Effective integration involves developing collaborative care models, regulatory frameworks, and interdisciplinary partnerships. Future directions include advancing research to understand traditional remedies’ mechanisms, improving quality control, and exploring hybrid therapies. By fostering collaboration between traditional healers, researchers, and modern healthcare professionals, and addressing ethical and safety concerns, traditional practices can be harnessed while enhancing overall cancer care. Keywords: Traditional Healing, Cancer Treatment, Benefits, Risks, Modern Medicine