Gram-negative bacterial infections that are resistant to carbapenems are a serious clinical problem. The only effective drugs against them are still tigecycline and colistin. In fact, polymyxin E, also known as colistin, has been regarded as a "last resort" antibiotic. But in recent years, colistin resistance has increased globally, significantly reducing treatment options and highlighting the significance of accurate colistin testing methods to support appropriate therapeutic decision-making. There is no requirement to cite reference in the abstract. So it is suggested to rephrase the sentence. The primary goal of the study is to compare the effectiveness of E-test and Vitek 2 for colistin sensitivity testing to the conventional microbroth dilution method using 120 clinical isolates of and that are resistant to carbapenem over the course of a year, isolated from January to December 2019. In comparison to Vitek-2, the results indicated that brothmicro dilution and E-test produced the narrowest range of colistin MICs. After comparing the E-test's errors and overall agreement with BMD, 100% of the Essential Agreement, 94.27% of the Categorical Agreement, and 5.72% of the Very Major Errors with no Major Errors were found. Comparing Vitek-2 with BMD, similar results were found: 1.66% MEs, 98.32% CAs, 80.99% EAs, and no VMEs. As a result, it was determined that, in contrast to Vitek-2, MBD and E-test had distinct MICs, making them appropriate for determining colistin MIC. It will take more research on automated systems to standardize colistin susceptibility testing procedures, particularly for and .
Read full abstract