Coli cAMP Receptor Protein Research Articles

CAMP Activation of the cAMP Receptor Protein, a Model Bacterial Transcription Factor.

The active and inactive structures of the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP), a model bacterial transcription factor, are compared to generate a paradigm in the cAMP-induced activation of CRP. The resulting paradigm is shown to be consistent with numerous biochemical studies of CRP and CRP*, a group of CRP mutants displaying cAMP-free activity. The cAMP affinity of CRP is dictated by two factors: (i) the effectiveness of the cAMP pocket and (ii) the protein equilibrium of apo-CRP. How these two factors interplay in determining the cAMP affinity and cAMP specificity of CRP and CRP* mutants are discussed. Both the current understanding and knowledge gaps of CRP-DNA interactions are also described. This review ends with a list of several important CRP issues that need to be addressed in the future.

Structural Energy Landscapes and Plasticity of the Microstates of Apo Escherichia coli cAMP Receptor Protein.

The theory for allostery has evolved to a modern energy landscape ensemble theory, the major feature of which is the existence of multiple microstates in equilibrium. The properties of microstates are not well defined due to their transient nature. Characterization of apo protein microstates is important because the specific complex of the ligand-bound microstate defines the biological function. The information needed to link biological function and structure is a quantitative correlation of the energy landscapes between the apo and holo protein states. We employed the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) system to test the features embedded in the ensemble theory because multiple crystalline apo and holo structures are available. Small angle X-ray scattering data eliminated one of the three apo states but not the other two. We defined the underlying energy landscape differences among the apo microstates by employing the computation algorithm COREX/BEST. The same connectivity patterns among residues in apo CRP are retained upon binding of cAMP. The microstates of apo CRP differ from one another by minor structural perturbations, resulting in changes in the energy landscapes of the various domains of CRP. Using the differences in energy landscapes among these apo states, we computed the cAMP binding energetics that were compared with solution biophysical results. Only one of the three apo microstates yielded data consistent with the solution data. The relative magnitude of changes in energy landscapes embedded in various apo microstates apparently defines the ultimate outcome of the cooperativity of binding.

Gly184 of the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein provides optimal context for both DNA binding and RNA polymerase interaction.

The Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) utilizes the helix-turn-helix motif for DNA binding. The CRP's recognition helix, termed F-helix, includes a stretch of six amino acids (Arg180, Glu181, Thr182, Val183, Gly184, and Arg185) for direct DNA contacts. Arg180, Glu181 and Arg185 are known as important residues for DNA binding and specificity, but little has been studied for the other residues. Here we show that Gly184 is another F-helix residue critical for the transcriptional activation function of CRP. First, glycine was repeatedly selected at CRP position 184 for its unique ability to provide wild type-level transcriptional activation activity. To dissect the glycine requirement, wild type CRP and mutants G184A, G184F, G184S, and G184Y were purified and their in vitro DNA-binding activity was measured. G184A and G184F displayed reduced DNA binding, which may explain their low transcriptional activation activity. However, G184S and G184Y displayed apparently normal DNA affinity. Therefore, an additional factor is needed to account for the diminished transcriptional activation function in G184S and G184Y, and the best explanation is perturbations in their interaction with RNA polymerase. The fact that glycine is the smallest amino acid could not fully warrant its suitability, as shown in this study. We hypothesize that Gly184 fulfills the dual functions of DNA binding and RNA polymerase interaction by conferring conformational flexibility to the F-helix.

Protein-induced DNA linking number change by sequence-specific DNA binding proteins and its biological effects.

Sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins play essential roles in many fundamental biological events such as DNA replication, recombination, and transcription. One common feature of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins is to introduce structural changes to their DNA recognition sites including DNA-bending and DNA linking number change (ΔLk). In this article, I review recent progress in studying protein-induced ΔLk by several sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins, such as E. coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) and lactose repressor (LacI). It was demonstrated recently that protein-induced ΔLk is an intrinsic property for sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins and does not correlate to protein-induced other structural changes, such as DNA bending. For instance, although CRP bends its DNA recognition site by 90°, it was not able to introduce a ΔLk to it. However, LacI was able to simultaneously bend and introduce a ΔLk to its DNA binding sites. Intriguingly, LacI also constrained superhelicity within LacI-lac O1 complexes if (-) supercoiled DNA templates were provided. I also discuss how protein-induced ΔLk help sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins regulate their biological functions. For example, it was shown recently that LacI utilizes the constrained superhelicity (ΔLk) in LacI-lac O1 complexes and serves as a topological barrier to constrain free, unconstrained (-) supercoils within the 401-bp DNA loop. These constrained (-) supercoils enhance LacI's binding affinity and therefore the repression of the lac promoter. Other biological functions include how DNA replication initiators λ O and DnaA use the induced ΔLk to open/melt bacterial DNA replication origins.

Protein-induced DNA linking number change by sequence-specific DNA binding proteins and its biological effects.

Sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins play essential roles in many fundamental biological events such as DNA replication, recombination, and transcription. One common feature of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins is to introduce structural changes to their DNA recognition sites including DNA-bending and DNA linking number change (ΔLk). In this article, I review recent progress in studying protein-induced ΔLk by several sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins, such as E. coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) and lactose repressor (LacI). It was demonstrated recently that protein-induced ΔLk is an intrinsic property for sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins and does not correlate to protein-induced other structural changes, such as DNA bending. For instance, although CRP bends its DNA recognition site by 90°, it was not able to introduce a ΔLk to it. However, LacI was able to simultaneously bend and introduce a ΔLk to its DNA binding sites. Intriguingly, LacI also constrained superhelicity within LacI-lac O1 complexes if (-) supercoiled DNA templates were provided. I also discuss how protein-induced ΔLk help sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins regulate their biological functions. For example, it was shown recently that LacI utilizes the constrained superhelicity (ΔLk) in LacI-lac O1 complexes and serves as a topological barrier to constrain free, unconstrained (-) supercoils within the 401-bp DNA loop. These constrained (-) supercoils enhance LacI's binding affinity and therefore the repression of the lac promoter. Other biological functions include how DNA replication initiators λ O and DnaA use the induced ΔLk to open/melt bacterial DNA replication origins.

Directed Evolution of the Escherichia coli cAMP Receptor Protein at the cAMP Pocket

The Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) requires cAMP binding to undergo a conformational change for DNA binding and transcriptional regulation. Two CRP residues, Thr(127) and Ser(128), are known to play important roles in cAMP binding through hydrogen bonding and in the cAMP-induced conformational change, but the connection between the two is not completely clear. Here, we simultaneously randomized the codons for these two residues and selected CRP mutants displaying high CRP activity in a cAMP-producing E. coli. Many different CRP mutants satisfied the screening condition for high CRP activity, including those that cannot form any hydrogen bonds with the incoming cAMP at the two positions. In vitro DNA-binding analysis confirmed that these selected CRP mutants indeed display high CRP activity in response to cAMP. These results indicate that the hydrogen bonding ability of the Thr(127) and Ser(128) residues is not critical for the cAMP-induced CRP activation. However, the hydrogen bonding ability of Thr(127) and Ser(128) was found to be important in attaining high cAMP affinity. Computational analysis revealed that most natural cAMP-sensing CRP homologs have Thr/Ser, Thr/Thr, or Thr/Asn at positions 127 and 128. All of these pairs are excellent hydrogen bonding partners and they do not elevate CRP activity in the absence of cAMP. Taken together, our analyses suggest that CRP evolved to have hydrogen bonding residues at the cAMP pocket residues 127 and 128 for performing dual functions: preserving high cAMP affinity and keeping CRP inactive in the absence of cAMP.

Spacing requirements for Class I transcription activation in bacteria are set by promoter elements.

The Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) activates transcription initiation at many promoters by binding upstream of core promoter elements and interacting with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit. Previous studies have shown stringent spacing is required for transcription activation by CRP. Here we report that this stringency can be altered by the nature of different promoter elements at target promoters. Several series of CRP-dependent promoters were constructed with CRP moved to different upstream locations, and their activities were measured. The results show that (i) a full UP element, located immediately downstream of the DNA site for CRP, relaxes the spacing requirements for activation and increases the recruitment of RNAP and open complex formation; (ii) the distal UP subsite plays the key role in this relaxation; (iii) modification of the extended −10 element also affects the spacing requirements for CRP-dependent activation. From these results, we conclude that the spacing requirements for CRP-dependent transcription activation vary according to the sequence of different promoter elements, and our results are important for understanding the organization of promoters in many different bacteria which are controlled by transcription factors that use activatory mechanisms similar to CRP.

Divide a Plasmid DNA Molecule into Two Independent Superhelical Domains by Sequence-Specific DNA-Binding Proteins: A DNA Superhelical Barrier Model

Both prokaryotic and eukaryotic chromosome are organized into many independent topological domains. These topological domains are presumably formed through constraining each DNA end from rotating by the interaction with nuclear proteins, i.e., DNA-binding proteins. However, so far, there is no direct evidence to support this hypothesis. In this study, we utilized two new in vitro methods, developed in our laboratory to examine whether certain sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins can separate a plasmid DNA molecule into different DNA superhelical domains. Our new methods are based on the successful construction of several plasmid DNA templates that contain many tandem copies of one DNA-binding sites in two different locations (, B., Xiao, Y., Liu, C., Li, C., and Leng, F. (2010) Nucleic Acids Resesearch, 38, 3643-3654). Using these new methods we discovered that several sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins, i.e., LacI, GalR, AraC, λ O protein, can divide a plasmid DNA molecule into two independent superhelical domains. These independent superhelical domains are thermodynamically stable. Interestingly, CRP (E. coli cAMP receptor protein), a DNA-bind and -bending protein, cannot divide the plasmid DNA molecule into different DNA topological domains. Our results can be explained by a superhelical barrier model of nucleoprotein complexes in which DNA supercoils may be confined in localized regions. We propose that the DNA superhelical barriers are certain nucleoprotein complexes that contain stable toroidal supercoils assembled from DNA looping or tightly wrapping DNA around DNA-binding proteins. The biological significance of the new superhelical barrier model will be discussed. This work is supported by a NIH grant 5SC1HD063059-02.

An HcpR homologue from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans and its possible role in nitrate reduction and nitrosative stress

The Escherichia coli CRP (cAMP receptor protein), is a global regulator of transcription that modulates gene expression by activation or repression at a range of promoters in E. coli. A major function is to regulate the selection of nutrients required for growth. The anaerobic sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ATCC27774 is capable of utilizing sulfate, nitrite and nitrate as terminal electron acceptors. In the presence of both sulfate and nitrate, sulfate is reduced preferentially despite nitrate being the thermodynamically more favourable electron acceptor. Three inverted repeat sequences upstream of the D. desulfuricans ATCC27774 nap (nitrate reduction in the periplasm) operon have high levels of similarity to the consensus sequence for the E. coli CRP DNA-binding site. In other Desulfovibrio species a putative CRP homologue, HcpR [regulator of hcp (hybrid cluster protein) transcription], has a predicted regulon comprising genes involved in sulfate reduction and nitrosative stress. The presence of CRP consensus sites within the D. desulfuricans ATCC27774 nap promoter prompted a search for CRP homologues in the genomes of sulfate-reducing bacteria. This revealed the presence of a potential CRP homologue that we predict binds to CRP consensus sites such as those of the nap operon. Furthermore, we predict that much of the core HcpR regulon predicted in other Desulfovibrio species is conserved in D. desulfuricans.

Cyclic GMP controls Rhodospirillum centenum cyst development

Adenylyl cyclases are widely distributed across all kingdoms whereas guanylyl cyclases are generally thought to be restricted to eukaryotes. Here we report that the α-proteobacterium Rhodospirillum centenum secretes cGMP when developing cysts and that a guanylyl cyclase deletion strain fails to synthesize cGMP and is defective in cyst formation. The R. centenum cyclase was purified and shown to effectively synthesize cGMP from GTP in vitro, demonstrating that it is a functional guanylyl cyclase. A homologue of the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) is linked to the guanylyl cyclase and when deleted is deficient in cyst development. Isothermal calorimetry (ITC) and differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) analyses demonstrate that the recombinant CRP homologue preferentially binds to, and is stabilized by cGMP, but not cAMP. This study thus provides evidence that cGMP has a crucial role in regulating prokaryotic development. The involvement of cGMP in regulating bacterial development has broader implications as several plant-interacting bacteria contain a similar cyclase coupled by the observation that Azospirillum brasilense also synthesizes cGMP when inducing cysts.

TP0262 is a modulator of promoter activity of tpr Subfamily II genes of Treponema pallidum ssp. pallidum

Transcriptional regulation in Treponema pallidum ssp. pallidum is poorly understood, primarily because this organism cannot be cultivated in vitro or genetically manipulated. We have recently shown a phase variation mechanism controlling transcription initiation of Subfamily II tpr (T. pallidumrepeat) genes (tprE, tprG and tprJ), a group of virulence factor candidates. Furthermore, the same study suggested that additional mechanisms might influence the level of transcription of these tprs. The T. pallidum genome sequence has revealed a few open reading frames with similarity to known bacterial transcription factors, including four catabolite activator protein homologues. In this work, sequences matching the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) binding motif were identified in silico upstream of tprE, tprG and tprJ. Using elecrophoretic mobility shift assay and DNaseI footprinting assay, recombinant TP0262, a T. pallidum CRP homologue, was shown to bind specifically to amplicons obtained from the tpr promoters containing putative CRP binding motifs. Using a heterologous reporter system, binding of TP0262 to these promoters was shown to either increase (tprE and tprJ) or decrease (tprG) tpr promoter activity. This is the first characterization of a T. pallidum transcriptional modulator that influences tpr promoter activity.

Characterization of DNA-binding specificity and analysis of binding sites of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa global regulator, Vfr, a homologue of the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein

Vfr, a global regulator of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence factors, is a homologue of the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein, CRP. Vfr is 91% similar to CRP and maintains many residues important for CRP to bind cAMP, bind DNA, and interact with RNA polymerase at target promoters. While vfr can complement an E. coli crp mutant in beta-galactosidase production, tryptophanase production and catabolite repression, crp can only complement a subset of Vfr-dependent phenotypes in P. aeruginosa. Using specific CRP binding site mutations, it is shown that Vfr requires the same nucleotides as CRP for optimal transcriptional activity from the E. coli lac promoter. In contrast, CRP did not bind Vfr target sequences in the promoters of the toxA and regA genes. Footprinting analysis revealed Vfr protected sequences upstream of toxA, regA, and the quorum sensing regulator lasR, that are similar to but significantly divergent from the CRP consensus binding sequence, and Vfr causes similar DNA bending to CRP in bound target sequences. Using a preliminary Vfr consensus binding sequence deduced from the Vfr-protected sites, Vfr target sequences were identified upstream of the virulence-associated genes plcN, plcHR, pbpG, prpL and algD, and in the vfr/orfX, argH/fimS, pilM/ponA intergenic regions. From these sequences the Vfr consensus binding sequence, 5'-ANWWTGNGAWNY : AGWTCACAT-3', was formulated. This study suggests that Vfr shares many of the same functions as CRP, but has specialized functions, at least in terms of DNA target sequence binding, required for regulation of a subset of genes in its regulon.

Studies of the distribution of Escherichia coli cAMP-receptor protein and RNA polymerase along the E. coli chromosome.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation and high-density microarrays have been used to monitor the distribution of the global transcription regulator Escherichia coli cAMP-receptor protein (CRP) and RNA polymerase along the E. coli chromosome. Our results identify targets occupied by CRP and genes transcribed by RNA polymerase in vivo. Many of the loci of CRP binding are at known CRP regulated promoters. However, our results show that CRP also interacts with thousands of weaker sites across the whole chromosome and that this "background" binding can be used as a probe for organization within the E. coli folded chromosome. In rapidly growing cells, we show that the major sites of RNA polymerase binding are approximately 90 transcription units that include genes needed for protein synthesis. Upon the addition of rifampicin, RNA polymerase is distributed among >500 functional promoters. We show that the chromatin immunoprecipitation and high-density-microarrays methodology can be used to study the redistribution of RNA polymerase induced by environmental stress, revealing previously uncharacterized aspects of RNA polymerase behavior and providing an alternative to the "transcriptomics" approach for studying global transcription patterns.

Proposed Structural Mechanism of Escherichia coli cAMP Receptor Protein cAMP-Dependent Proteolytic Cleavage Protection and Selective and Nonselective DNA Binding,

The Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) displays biphasic characteristics in protease and beta-galactosidase induction assays at increasing cAMP concentrations in response to ligand binding at the secondary binding site located between the primary binding site and the DNA binding domain. Two mutants were created to determine the mechanistic reason for the CRP biphasic response by inhibiting binding of cAMP to the secondary site via interference with the Arg 181 interaction with the ligand's phosphate. The S179A/R180D/E181H mutant binds two cAMP molecules per dimer, does not exhibit a biphasic response, lacks selective DNA binding, and has inhibited nonselective DNA binding. The R180K mutant binds four cAMP molecules per dimer, exhibits a biphasic response, nonselective DNA binding similar to CRP, but has inhibited selective DNA binding characteristics. The results are consistent with a 2 x 2-binding site scheme were both primary binding sites must be occupied before the secondary binding sites are occupied. A structural mechanism suggesting the secondary sites are formed by binding of cAMP to the primary sites is proposed. AMMP-generated molecular models suggest that R180 orients E181 to produce selective DNA binding, Arg 169 interactions are necessary for nonselective DNA binding, and the position of Leu 57 inhibits chymotrypsin cleavage of Phe 136. DNA binding results suggest that CRP may be the unknown transcription factor which binds to the temperature sensitive dsrA promoter.

The Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein bound at a single target can activate transcription initiation at divergent promoters: a systematic study that exploits new promoter probe plasmids.

We report the first detailed quantitative study of divergent promoters dependent on the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP), a factor known to activate transcription initiation at target promoters by making direct interactions with the RNA polymerase holoenzyme. In this work, we show that CRP bound at a single target site is able to activate transcription at two divergently organized promoters. Experiments using promoter probe plasmids, designed to study divergent promoters in vivo and in vitro, show that the divergent promoters function independently. Further in vitro experiments show that two holo RNA polymerase molecules cannot be accommodated simultaneously at the divergent promoters.

Dissection of a surface-exposed portion of the cAMP-CRP complex that mediates transcription activation and repression.

The Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) is essential for the activation and repression of transcription initiation at promoters in the CytR regulon. CRP performs these activities by making direct protein-protein interactions to the alpha-subunits of RNA polymerase and to the CytR regulator. Strikingly, it has been shown that amino acids of CRP that are critical for communication with the two partner proteins are located in close proximity on the surface of CRP. Here, we have dissected this surface in order to pinpoint the 'repression region' of CRP and to assess whether it overlaps with the characterized 'activating region'. Our results established that residues 12, 13, 17, 105, 108 and 110 are essential for the interaction with CytR and confirmed that 'activating region' 2 of CRP is made up of residues 19, 21 and 101. In the crystallographic structure of the CRP-DNA complex, the two sets of determinants are located immediately adjacent to each other forming a consecutive surface-exposed patch. The 'repression region' is chemically complementary to the characterized region on CytR that is essential for protein-protein communication to CRP. Moreover, the results provide insight into the mechanism by which CytR might prevent CRP-mediated transcription.

Interactions between the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein and the C-terminal domain of the α subunit of RNA polymerase at Class I promoters

The Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) is a factor that activates transcription at over 100 target promoters. At Class I CRP-dependent promoters, CRP binds immediately upstream of RNA polymerase and activates transcription by making direct contacts with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit (alphaCTD). Since alphaCTD is also known to interact with DNA sequence elements (known as UP elements), we have constructed a series of semi-synthetic Class I CRP-dependent promoters, carrying both a consensus DNA-binding site for CRP and a UP element at different positions. We previously showed that, at these promoters, the CRP-alphaCTD interaction and the CRP-UP element interaction contribute independently and additively to transcription initiation. In this study, we show that the two halves of the UP element can function independently, and that, in the presence of the UP element, the best location for the DNA site for CRP is position -69.5. This suggests that, at Class I CRP-dependent promoters where the DNA site for CRP is located at position -61.5, the two alphaCTDs of RNA polymerase are not optimally positioned. Two experiments to test this hypothesis are presented.

Genetic strategy for analyzing specificity of dimer formation: Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein mutant altered in its dimerization specificity.

Many transcriptional regulators function in homo- or heterodimeric combinations. The same protein can carry out distinct regulatory functions depending on the partner with which it associates. Here, we describe a mutant of the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) that has an altered dimerization specificity; that is, mutant/mutant homodimers form preferentially over wild-type/mutant heterodimers. CRP dimerization involves the formation of a parallel coiled-coil structure, and our CRP mutant bears an amino acid substitution affecting the first "d" position residue within the alpha-helix that mediates CRP dimerization. The genetic strategy we used to isolate this CRP altered dimerization specificity (ADS) mutant is generalizable and could be utilized to isolate ADS mutants of other dimeric transcriptional regulators.

Probing the mechanism of CRP activation by site-directed mutagenesis: the role of serine 128 in the allosteric pathway of cAMP receptor protein activation.

Upon activation by cAMP, Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) controls the expression of a network of catabolite sensitive genes. The activation of CRP by cAMP involves conformational changes such as realignments between subunits and domains within the protein. To understand the molecular events that lead to the activation of CRP, point mutations at position 128 were introduced via site-directed mutagenesis in an attempt to specifically affect the subunit interfacial interactions, as well as the ligand-binding reaction. The biochemical and biophysical properties of these mutants were rigorously tested with the goal of identifying the partial reactions in the activation pathway that are perturbed by this specific mutation. Results from this study suggest that mutation of Ser 128 to Ala or Pro does not significantly disturb the overall secondary structure as monitored by circular dichroism. The energetics of subunit-subunit interaction and protein stability were monitored by sedimentation and spectroscopic techniques. Although these mutants were designed to interrupt intersubunit interactions, the energetics of subunit association and protein stability remain quantitatively the same as those of the wild-type CRP. Nevertheless, the ability of the subunit to be realigned to the DNA-binding form is significantly affected as reflected by the pronounced decrease in the susceptibility of mutant CRP to proteolytic digestion in the presence of cAMP. In addition, the binding affinity of cAMP to the first ligand site in mutants S128A and S128P is the same as that of the wild type, but the affinity to the second ligand site is reduced. This observation indicates that mutation at position 128 affects ligand binding by amplifying the magnitude of negative cooperativity. Mutation at residue 128 does not impair the ability of interdomain interactions as indicated by the quantitative response of a spectroscopic probe in the DNA-binding domain to the binding of cAMP to the ligand-binding domain. The S128A mutant binds to a specific DNA sequence about 50-fold weaker than the wild-type CRP, while the mutant S128P has no measurable DNA affinity under the same conditions. This observation is consistent with the in vivo result that both mutants display an inactive CRP phenotype (CRP-). In summary, these results suggest that communication between domains induced by cAMP binding can be dissociated from the proper subunit realignment of the CRP dimer that is crucial for the activation of CRP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Energetics of intersubunit and intrasubunit interactions of Escherichia coli adenosine cyclic 3',5'-phosphate receptor protein.

Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) regulates the expression of a large number of catabolite-sensitive genes. The mechanism of CRP regulation most likely involves communication between subunits and domains. A specific message, such as the activation of CRP, may be manifested as a change in the interactions between these structural entities. Hence, the elucidation of the regulatory mechanism would require a quantitative evaluation of the energetics involved in these interactions. Thus, a study was initiated to define the conditions for reversible denaturation of CRP and to quantitatively assess the energetics involved in the intra- and intersubunit interactions in CRP. The denaturation of CRP was induced by guanidine hydrochloride. The equilibrium unfolding reaction of CRP was monitored by three spectroscopic techniques, namely, fluorescence intensity, fluorescence anisotropy, and circular dichroism. The spectroscopic data implied that CRP unfolds in a single cooperative transition. Sedimentation equilibrium data showed that CRP is dissociated into its monomeric state in high concentrations of denaturant. Unfolding of CRP is completely reversible, as indicated by fluorescence and circular dichroism measurements, and sedimentation data indicated that a dimeric structure of CRP was recovered. The functional and other structural properties of renatured and native CRP have also been examined. Quantitatively identical results were obtained. Results from additional studies as a function of protein concentration and from computer simulation demonstrated that the denaturation of CRP induced by guanidine hydrochloride proceeds according to the following pathway: (CRP2)Native<-->2(CRP)Native<-->2(CRP)Denatured. The delta G values for dissociation (delta Gd) and unfolding (delta G(u)) in the absence of guanidine hydrochloride were determined by linear extrapolation, yielding values of 12.0 +/- 0.6 and 7.2 +/- 0.1 kcal/mol, respectively. To examine the effect of the DNA binding domain on the stability of the cAMP binding domain, two proteolytically resistant cAMP binding cores were prepared from CRP in the presence of cAMP by subtilisin and chymotrypsin digestion, yielding S-CRP and CH-CRP, respectively. Results from an equilibrium denaturation study indicated that the denaturation of both CH-CRP and S-CRP is also completely reversible. Both S-CRP and CH-CRP exist as stable dimers with similar delta Gd values of 10.1 +/- 0.4 and 9.5 +/- 0.4 kcal/mol, respectively. Results from this study in conjunction with crystallographic data [McKay, D. B., Weber, I. T., & Stietz, T. A. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 9518-9524] indicate that the DNA binding domain and the C-helix are not the only structural elements that are responsible for subunit dimerization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)