Coil Embolization In Patients Research Articles

Endovascular occlusion of segmental arteries feeding the anterior spinal artery to stage endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic repair

ObjectiveMinimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization was introduced to prevent spinal cord ischemia after endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. There is no consensus on whether the endovascular occlusion of segmental arteries feeding directly the anterior radiculomedullary artery and anterior spinal artery can be safely performed without causing spinal cord ischemia. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility and clinical impact of endovascular occlusion of segmental arteries supplying the anterior spinal artery during minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization in patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. MethodsBetween January 2018 and July 2020, 54 patients (36 male; mean age, 71.1 ± 9.3 years) underwent direct embolization of segmental arteries feeding the anterior radiculomedullary artery before endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. End points included technical success of minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization of segmental arteries, anterior radiculomedullary artery, neurological complications, and in-hospital mortality after minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization and endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. ResultsThe thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm classification was type I (n = 8), type II (n = 24), type III (n = 11), and type IV (n = 11). During minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization, 388 segmental arteries were occluded, each patient having 7.2 ± 3.1 coiled segmental arteries occluding 64.5% (25-100%) of open segmental arteries within the treated aortic segment. Altogether, 66 anterior radiculomedullary arteries were seen originating between Th8 and L3 levels from 85 (21.9%) segmental arteries. In 10 patients (18.5%), 2 large anterior radiculomedullary arteries were identified, and 1 patient (1.9%) showed 3 anterior radiculomedullary arteries on the spinal arteriography. No spinal cord ischemia or procedure-related complications occurred after minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization. After 47.9 ± 39.4 days, all patients received endovascular repair of their thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. There was no in-hospital mortality. One male patient developed incomplete temporary spinal cord ischemia after endovascular repair. ConclusionsMinimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization of segmental arteries feeding the anterior spinal artery in patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms to prevent spinal cord ischemia after endovascular repair is feasible and clinically safe.

Fluid dynamic analysis in predicting the recanalization of intracranial aneurysms after coil embolization – A study of spatiotemporal characteristics

PurposeHemodynamics play a key role in the management of cerebral aneurysm recanalization after coil embolization; however, the most reliable hemodynamic parameter remains unknown. Previous studies have explored the use of both spatiotemporally averaged and maximal definitions for hemodynamic parameters, based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis, to build predictive models for aneurysmal recanalization. In this study, we aimed to assess the influence of different spatiotemporal characteristics of hemodynamic parameters on predictive performance. MethodsHemodynamics were simulated using CFD for 66 cerebral aneurysms from 65 patients. We evaluated 14 types of spatiotemporal definitions for two hemodynamic parameters in the pre-coiling model and five in virtual post-coiling model (VM) created by cutting the aneurysm from the pre-coiling model. A total of 91 spatiotemporal hemodynamic features were derived and utilized to develop univariate predictor (UP) and multivariate logistic regression (LR) models. The model's performance was assessed using two metrics: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). ResultsDifferent spatiotemporal hemodynamic features exhibited a wide range of AUROC values ranging from 0.224 to 0.747, with 22 feature pairs showing a significant difference in AUROC value (P-value <0.05), despite being derived from the same hemodynamic parameter. PDave,q1 was identified as the strongest UP with AUROC/AUPRC values of 0.747/0.385, yielding sensitivity and specificity value of 0.889 and 0.614 at the optimal cut-off value, respectively. The LR model further improved the prediction performance, having AUROC/AUPRC values of 0.890/0.903. At the optimal cut-off value, the LR model achieved a specificity of 0.877, sensitivity of 0.719, outperforming the UP model. ConclusionOur research indicated that the characteristics of hemodynamic parameters in terms of space and time had a significant impact on the development of predictive model. Our findings suggest that LR model based on spatiotemporal hemodynamic features could be clinically useful in predicting recanalization after coil embolization in patients, without the need for invasive procedures.

Braided stent-assisted coil embolization versus laser engraved stent-assisted coil embolization in patients with unruptured complex intracranial aneurysms

PurposesBraided and laser-cut stents both are efficacious and safe for coiling intracranial aneurysms. The study aimed to compare outcomes following braided stent-assisted coil embolization versus laser engraved stent-assisted coil embolization in 266 patients who were diagnosed with unruptured intracranial aneurysms of different types and locations. MethodsPatients with unruptured complex intracranial aneurysms underwent braided (BSE cohort, n = 125) or laser engraved (LSE cohort, n = 141) stent-assisted embolization. ResultsThe deployment success rate was higher for patients of the LSE cohort than those of the BSE cohort (140 [99%] vs. 117 [94%], p = 0.0142). Seventy-one (fifty-seven percentages) and 73 (52%) were coil embolization procedure success rates of the BSE and the LSE cohorts. Periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage was higher in patients of the BSE cohort than those of the LSE cohort (8 [6%] vs. 1 [1%], p = 0.0142). Four (three percentages) patients from the LSE cohort and 3 (2%) patients from the BSE cohort had in-stent thrombosis during embolization. Permanent morbidities were higher in patients of the LSE cohort than those of the BSE cohort (8 [6%] vs. 1 [1%], p = 0.0389). Higher successful procedures (76% vs. 68%) and fewer postprocedural intracranial hemorrhage (0% vs. 5%) and mortality (0% vs. 5%) were reported for patients of the BSE cohort in posterior circulation aneurysmal location than those of the LSE cohort. Laser engraved stent has fewer problems with deployment and may have better periprocedural and follow-up outcomes after embolization. ConclusionsBraided stent-assisted embolization should be preferred when the aneurysm is present in the posterior circulation.

Factors associated with rebleeding after coil embolization in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Background and Aims : Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) has a high mortality rate, and hemorrhage amounts and perioperative rebleeding importantly determines prognosis. However, despite adequate treatment, prognosis is poor in many ruptured aneurysm cases. In this study, we identified and evaluated factors related to perioperative rebleeding in patients with aSAH.

Radiation Dose and Fluoroscopy Time of Endovascular Coil Embolization in Patients with Carotid Cavernous Fistulas.

Carotid cavernous fistulas (CCFs) are abnormal connections between the cavernous sinus and the internal and/or external carotid artery. Endovascular therapy is the gold standard treatment. In the current retrospective single-center study we report detailed dosimetrics of all patients with CCFs treated by endovascular coil embolization between January 2012 and August 2021. Procedural and dosimetric data were compared between direct and indirect fistulas according to Barrow et al., and different DSA protocol groups. The local diagnostic reference level (DRL) was defined as the 3rd quartile of the dose distribution. In total, thirty patients met the study criteria. The local DRL was 376.2 Gy cm2. The procedural dose area product (DAP) (p = 0.03) and the number of implanted coils (p = 0.02) were significantly lower in direct fistulas. The median values for fluoroscopy time (FT) (p = 0.08) and number of DSA acquisitions (p = 0.84) were not significantly different between groups. There was a significantly positive correlation between DAP and FT (p = 0.003). The application of a dedicated low-dose protocol yielded a 32.6% DAP reduction. In conclusion, this study provides novel DRLs for endovascular CCF treatment using detachable coils. The data presented in this work might be used to establish new specific DRLs.

Factors associated with rebleeding after coil embolization in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

ObjectiveAneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) has a high mortality rate, and hemorrhage amounts and perioperative rebleeding importantly determines prognosis. However, despite adequate treatment, prognosis is poor in many ruptured aneurysm cases. In this study, we identified and evaluated factors related to perioperative rebleeding in patients with aSAH.MethodsThe medical and surgical records of 166 patients that underwent endovascular embolization for a ruptured cerebral aneurysm at a single institution from 2014 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed to identify risk factors of rebleeding. All patients were examined for risk factors and evaluated for increased hemorrhage by brain computed tomography at 3 days after surgery.ResultsThis series included 54 men (32.5%) and 112 women (67.5%) of mean age 58.3±14.3 years. After procedures, 26 patients (15.7%) experienced rebleeding, and 1 of these (0.6%) experienced an intraoperative aneurysmal rupture. External ventricular drainage (EVD) (odds ratio [OR] 5.389, [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.171-24.801]) and modified Fisher grade (OR 2.037, [95% CI 1.077-3.853]) were found to be independent risk factors of rebleeding, and perioperative rebleeding was strongly associated with patient outcomes (p＜0.001).ConclusionsWe concluded the rebleeding risk after aSAH is greater in patients with large hemorrhage amounts and a high pre-operative modified Fisher grade, and thus, we caution neurosurgeons should take care in such cases.

Clinical efficacy of stent-assisted coil embolization for recurrent intracranial bifurcation aneurysms

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stent-assisted coil embolization in patients with recurrent intracranial bifurcation aneurysms,after initial simple coiling or microsurgical clipping. Methods: Clinical data of 20 patients with recurrent intracranial bifurcation aneurysms who initially underwent simple coiling or surgical clipping and subsequently re-treated by stent-assisted coiling embolization at the Radiology Intervention Department of Huashan Hospital between March 2009 and November 2019 were collected and analyzed retrospectively.There were 9 males and 11 females,with a median age of 55.5 years (range:33 to 71 years),including 17 aneurysms initially treated with simple coiling and 3 treated with surgical clipping.All cases were re-treated with stent-assisted coiling,15 using a single stent and 5 employing two stents in a Y-configuration.Peri-and post-operative complications and outcomes were evaluated.Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to compare the follow-up duration between initial treatment and re-treatment.Student's t tests were used to compare the parent artery angles before re-treatment, after re-treatment and at the last follow-up. The parent artery angle was defined using the proximal main trunk and the stented branch. Results: Immediate complete occlusion (Raymond Ⅰ) was achieved in 18 aneurysms (90.0%) while 2 aneurysms (10.0%) had a residual neck (Raymond Ⅱ).The median follow-up time(M(QR)) was 8.5(16.3)months,which had no significantly different from the initial treatment follow-up duration (15.5(27.0)months)(U=157.7,P=0.25). During the follow-up period,2 aneurysms (10.0%) with immediate post-operative residual necks recanalized again,including 1 aneurysm re-treated with the Y-configuration stent.Symptomatic thromboembolic complications occurred in 6 patients,including 4 re-treated with the Y-configuration stent.No peri-operative hemorrhagic complications occurred,along with no operation-related permanent disability or death. The parent artery angle increased significantly from pre-operative(90.1±21.1)°to post-operative and the last follow-up ((115.4±28.9)° and (132.6±26.8)°);t=5.14,P<0.01;t=7.78,P<0.01). Conclusion: For recurrent intracranial bifurcation aneurysms after initial surgical clipping or simple coiling,stent assisted coil embolization is proved to be safe and can decrease recurrence rate.

Rescue Stenting Using Neuroform Atlas Stent During Coiling Protrusion for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

Endovascular coiling is generally considered as an effective treatment option for ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Increasing operator experience and quality of tools determined an improvement of endovascular cerebral aneurysms' treatment. However, procedure-related complications still occur. The purpose of this study is to report a series of rescue stenting procedures with the Neuroform Atlas (NA) open-cell stent, for intraprocedural complications during coil embolization in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Between April 2016 and January 2018, 12 consecutive coil protrusions that occurred during ruptured aneurysms' embolizations were rescued using NA stenting together with tirofiban therapy. Follow-up was performed with initial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 1 month and then MRA plus standard digital subtraction angiography at 11-13 months after the procedure. Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients. No NA stent delivery/deployment complication occurred. Initial MRA showed complete occlusion of the aneurysm, with evidence of blood flow into parent vessels in 12 out of 12 cases. At 11-13 months, MRA and digital subtraction angiography showed 10 complete occlusion cases and 1 partial occlusion case. At 2 months, 1 death occurred due to subarachnoid hemorrhage. The open-cell NA stent represents a rescue option for coil protrusion during endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms allowing regular restoration of blood flow and minimizing thromboembolic events.

Pre-emptive nonselective perigraft aortic sac embolization with coils to prevent type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair

ObjectivePre-emptive selective embolization of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), lumbar arteries (LAs), and perigraft sac for prevention of type II endoleak (T2EL) has not been widely adopted. We perform pre-emptive nonselective perigraft aortic sac embolization with coils (PNPASEC) in patients at high risk for development of T2EL (four or more patent LAs, patent IMA ≥3 mm, and ≥30-mm aortic flow lumen). The goal of this study was to see whether PNPASEC decreases T2ELs requiring reinterventions. MethodsAll 266 patients undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair between September 1, 2007, and October 31, 2015, were retrospectively evaluated from a prospectively maintained database. Patients (N = 212; 211 men) with preoperative and postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans were included. Our PNPASEC technique involves leaving a wire in the sac after cannulation of the contralateral gate and inserting large (0.035-inch) coils into the sac after bifurcated graft deployment. T2EL and reintervention rates were compared between patients who underwent PNPASEC (group I) and those who met the criteria but did not have PNPASEC (group II) and those who did not meet the criteria (Group III). ResultsForty-seven (22.2%) patients were PNPASEC candidates and 165 (77.8%) patients (group III) were not. Among PNPASEC candidates, 16 (7.5%) underwent PNPASEC (group I) and 31 (14.6%) did not (group II). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of comorbidities, aneurysm size, and anatomic and neck characteristics. Mean number of patent LAs was similar between group I (4.5 ± 0.8) and group II (4.5 ± 0.9), which was significantly greater than in group III (1.9 ± 1.3; P < .001); 43.6% of group III patients had patent IMA. Mean follow-up was 44 ± 25 months. T2EL at 6 months was observed in 48.4% in group II, 3.0% in group III, and 6.3% in group I (P < .001). Sac diameter increase was seen in 38.7% in group II vs 6.1% in group III and 6.3% in group I (P < .001), with complete sac shrinkage in 23.3% in group II vs 23.8% in group III and 50.0% in group I (P = .09). T2EL-related interventions were performed in 29.0% in group II vs 1.2% in group III and 6.3% in group I (P < .001). Any endoleak at last follow-up was seen in 25.8% in group II vs 2.4% in group III and none in group I (P < .001). ConclusionsNonselective perigraft sac coil embolization in patients at high risk for T2EL (20% of patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair) is effective in preventing development of T2EL and is associated with decrease in sac size and reintervention rates.

Coil Embolization in Patients with Recurrent Cerebral Aneurysms Who Previously Underwent Surgical Clipping.

Surgical revision of recurrent cerebral aneurysms is technically difficult. Therefore, coil embolization has been used as an alternative in these cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and angiographic outcomes of coil embolization in patients with recurrent cerebral aneurysms after microsurgical clipping. Between May 1999 and February 2016, nineteen patients with 19 recurrent aneurysms who previously underwent surgical clipping were treated by coil embolization. Nine patients presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage (47.4%). The interval between surgical clipping and coil embolization was 143.5 ± 66.1 months (range, 43-276 months). Single- or double-catheter coil embolization was performed in 16 patients. A balloon (n = 1) and stents (n = 2) were used to assist the coil embolization in 3 patients. Immediate radiologic findings after coil embolization showed complete occlusion in 10 patients, a residual neck in 8 patients, and a residual sac in 1 patient. Procedure-related permanent morbidity occurred in 1 patient. The mean clinical follow-up was 58.3 ± 38.8 months. Poor clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score = ≥3) at the end of the clinical follow-up were reported in 5 patients (26.3%). Angiographic follow-up was available for 12 patients (63.2%). Major recurrence was detected in 5 patients (41.7%), and a tendency for aneurysm regrowth rather than coil compaction was noted in all cases. In our series, coil embolization for recurrent aneurysms after surgical clipping was feasible but had a high recurrence rate and tended to result in aneurysm regrowth rather than coil compaction.

Treatment at Safety-Net Hospitals Is Associated with Delays in Coil Embolization in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Successful endovascular management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) requires timely access to substantial resources. Prior studies suggest an association between time to treatment and patient outcome. Patients treated at safety-net hospitals are thought to be particularly vulnerable to disparities in access to interventions that require substantial technologic resources. We hypothesized that patients with aSAH treated at safety-net hospitals are at greater risk for delayed access to endovascular treatment. Adults undergoing endovascular coiling procedures between 2002 and 2011 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were included. Hospitals in the quartile with the highest proportion of Medicaid or uninsured patients were defined as safety-net hospitals. A multivariate model including patient-level and hospital-level factors was constructed to permit analysis of delays in endovascular treatment (defined as time to treatment >3 days). Analysis included 7109 discharges of patients with aSAH undergoing endovascular coil embolization procedures from 2002 to 2011. Median time to coil embolization in all patients was 1 day; 10.1% of patients waited >3 days until treatment. In multivariate analysis, patients treated at safety-net hospitals were more likely to have a prolonged time to coil embolization (odds ratio= 1.32, P<0.01) compared with patients treated at low-burden hospitals. After controlling for patient and hospital factors, individuals with aSAH treated at safety-net hospitals from 2002 to 2011 were more likely to have a delay to endovascular coil embolization than individuals treated at non-safety-net hospitals. This disparity could affect patient outcomes.

Headache Outcomes After Coil Embolization in Patients with Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Do They Get Better or Worse? A Prospective Analysis.

To investigate the association between headache outcomes and coil embolization and to identify potential factors associated with different headache outcomes in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) after treatment with coil embolization. A prospective study of patients with planned coil embolization for UIAs was conducted. The changes in headache patterns, headache-related disability, and depression were assessed before coil embolization and at 3 days and 2 and 6 weeks after coil embolization. All variables were analyzed to identify factors associated with different headache outcomes. Fifty-nine (72%) of 82 patients reported headaches before coil embolization. Of these, improvements in the severity of headaches were reported by 42 patients (71%). In addition to a significant reduction in headache severity, significant reductions in headache-related disability and depression scores also were observed. Demographic factors, aneurysmal characteristics, or procedural factors were not found to be significantly associated with improvement in the severity of headaches after coil embolization. In addition, the number of microemboli on diffusion-weighted imaging was not significantly associated with improvement of headaches after coil embolization. Twenty-three patients reported no headaches before coil embolization, and 3 (13%) patients reported new-onset headaches after coil embolization. All new-onset headaches were mild and dull in nature without combined symptoms in the temporal area. Our study suggested that regardless of headache characteristics, the aneurysm size (even those <5 mm in diameter), technique used (stent-assisted or not stent-assisted), and coil embolization of UIAs resulted in headache improvement in most patients with pretreatment headaches.

Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury after Coil Embolization for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

PurposeContrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is associated with poor outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. However, CI-AKI has rarely been evaluated within the neurovascular field. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and clinical implication of CI-AKI after coil embolization in patients with an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).Materials and MethodsBetween January 2005 and March 2016, 192 patients who underwent coil embolization were enrolled in this study. CI-AKI was defined as an increase from baseline serum creatinine concentration of >25% or >0.5 mg/dL within 72 hours after coil embolization. A poor clinical outcome was defined as a score of ≥3 on the modified Rankin Scale at one-year post-treatment.ResultsA total of 16 patients (8.3%) died as a result of medical problems within one year. CI-AKI was identified in 14 patients (7.3%). Prominent risk factors for one-year mortality included CI-AKI [odds ratio (OR): 16.856; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.437–82.664] and an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤8 (OR: 5.565; 95% CI: 1.703–18.184). A poor clinical outcome was associated with old age (≥65 years) (OR: 7.921; 95% CI: 2.977–21.076), CI-AKI (OR: 11.281; 95% CI: 2.138–59.525), an initial GCS score ≤8 (OR 31.02; 95% CI, 10.669–90.187), and a ruptured aneurysm (p=0.016, OR: 4.278) in posterior circulation.ConclusionCI-AKI seems to be an independent predictor of the overall outcomes of aSAH after endovascular treatment.

Intra-arterial and Intravenous Tirofiban Infusion for Thromboembolism during Endovascular Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysm.

ObjectiveThromboembolism is the one of the most serious complications that can occur during endovascular coil embolization of cerebral aneurysm. We report on the effectiveness and safety of intra-arterial/intravenous (IA/IV) glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (tirofiban) infusion for treating thromboembolism during endovascular coil embolization of cerebral aneurysm.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 242 patients with ruptured or unruptured cerebral aneurysms (n=264) who underwent endovascular coil embolization from January 2011 to June 2014. Thromboembolism occurred in 20 patients (7.4%), including 14 cases of ruptured aneurysms and 6 cases of unruptured aneurysms. The most common site of aneurysms was the anterior communicating artery (n=8), followed by middle cerebral artery (n=6). When we found an enlarged thromboembolism during coil embolization, we tried to dissolve it using tirofiban administered via IA and IV loading (5 μg/kg, respectively) for 3–5 minutes followed by IV maintenance (0.08 μg/kg/min) for approximately 4–24 hours.ResultsIn 4 of 5 patients with total vessel occlusion, the vessel was recanalized to Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Perfusion Scale (TICI) grade 3, and in 1 patient to TICI grade 2a. In 2 patients with partial vessel occlusion and 13 patients with minimal occlusion, the vessel recanalized to TICI grade 3. Irrelevant intracerebral hemorrhage was noted in 1 patient (5%), and thromboemboli-related cerebral infarction developed in 5 patients (25%), of which only 1 (5%) was symptomatic.ConclusionIA/IV infusion and IV maintenance with tirofiban appear to be an effective rescue treatment for thromboembolism during endovascular coil embolization in patients with ruptured or unruptured cerebral aneurysms.

Preoperative Coil Embolization in Patients With a Replaced Hepatic Artery Scheduled for Pancreatectomy With Splanchnic Artery Resection Helps to Prevent Ischemic Organ Injury.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevention of liver ischemic injury by preoperative coil embolization in patients with a replaced hepatic artery scheduled for pancreatectomy with splanchnic artery resection. Between July 2009 and May 2012, 4 patients with replaced hepatic artery underwent pancreatectomy plus splanchnic artery resection. The replaced right hepatic artery was preoperatively embolized in 2 patients. In the other 2 patients, the common hepatic artery was embolized preoperatively. We evaluated the complications encountered in the perioperative period. There were no embolization-related complications. Although 2 patients presented with small liver infarcts, the aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels did not exceed 1000 IU/L in any of the patients, and none experienced severe liver injury. Coil embolization before pancreatectomy with splanchnic artery resection in patients with a replaced hepatic artery may help to prevent severe ischemic liver injury in the perioperative period.

Clinical Analysis of Fever, Headache, and Gastrointestinal Symptoms after Endosaccular Coil Embolization in Patients with Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms— A Study of “Post Coiling Syndrome”

Clinical Analysis of Fever, Headache, and Gastrointestinal Symptoms after Endosaccular Coil Embolization in Patients with Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms— A Study of “Post Coiling Syndrome”

Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: Complications in Acutely Ruptured versus Unruptured Aneurysms.

The use of stents in the setting of SAH is controversial because of concerns about the efficacy and risk of dual antiplatelet therapy. We compare complications of stent-assisted coil embolization in patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms with complications in patients with unruptured aneurysms. Between February 2007 and March 2015, 45 acutely ruptured aneurysms and 47 unruptured aneurysms were treated with stent-assisted coiling. Patients with ruptured aneurysms were not pretreated with antiplatelet medication but received intravenous aspirin during the procedure. Thromboembolic events and early rebleeds were recorded. In ruptured aneurysms, 9 of 45 patients had thromboembolic complications. Four patients remained asymptomatic, 4 developed infarctions, and 1 patient died. The permanent complication rate in ruptured aneurysms was 11% (95% CI, 4%-24%). Five of 45 patients (11%; 95% CI, 4%-24%) had an early rebleed from the treated aneurysm after 3-45 days, and in 4, this rebleed was fatal. In 46 patients with 47 unruptured aneurysms, thromboembolic complications occurred in 2. One patient remained asymptomatic; the other had a thalamus infarction. The complication rate in unruptured aneurysms was 2.2% (1 of 46; 95% CI, 0.01%-12%). No first-time hemorrhages occurred in 46 patients with 47 aneurysms during 6 months of follow-up. The complication rate of stent-assisted coiling with early adverse events in ruptured aneurysms was 10 times higher than that in unruptured aneurysms. Early rebleed accounted for most mortality. In ruptured aneurysms, stent-assisted coil embolization is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and should only be considered when less risky options have been excluded.

The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 6-year results.

The authors report the 6-year results of the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial (BRAT). This ongoing randomized trial, with the final goal of a 10-year follow-up, compares the safety and efficacy of surgical clip occlusion and endovascular coil embolization in patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) from a ruptured aneurysm. The 1- and 3-year results of this trial have been previously reported. In total, 500 patients with an SAH met the entry criteria and were enrolled in the study. Of these patients, 471 were randomly assigned to the treatments: 238 to surgical clipping and 233 to endovascular coiling. Six patients who died before treatment and 57 patients with nonaneurysmal SAHs were excluded, leaving a total of 408 patients who underwent clipping (209 assigned) or coiling (199 assigned). Whether to treat patients within the assigned group or to cross over patients to the other group was at the discretion of the treating physician; 38% (75/199) of the patients assigned to coiling were crossed over to clipping and 1.9% (4/209) assigned to clipping were crossed over to coiling. The outcome data were collected by a dedicated nurse practitioner. The primary outcome analysis was based on the assigned treatment group; poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score > 2 and was independently adjudicated. Six years after randomization, 336 (82%) of 408 patients who had been treated were available for examination. On the basis of an mRS score of > 2, and similar to the results at the 3-year follow-up, no significant difference in outcomes (p = 0.24) was detected between the 2 treatment groups. Complete aneurysm obliteration at 6 years was achieved in 96% (111/116) of the clipping group and in 48% (23/48) of the coiling group (p < 0.0001). In the period between the 3- and 6-year follow-ups, 3 additional patients assigned to coiling and none assigned to clipping received retreatment, for overall retreatment rates of 4.6% (13/280) for clipping and 16.4% (21/128) for coiling (p < 0.0001). When aneurysm location was considered, the 6-year results continued to match the previously reported results, with no difference in outcome for anterior circulation aneurysms at most time points. Of the anterior circulation aneurysms assigned to coiling treatment, 42% (70/168) were crossed over to clipping treatment. The outcomes for posterior circulation aneurysms continued to favor coiling. The randomization process was unexpectedly skewed, with 18 of 21 treated aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) being assigned to clipping, but even when PICA aneurysms were removed from the analysis, outcomes for the posterior circulation aneurysms still favored coiling. Although BRAT was statistically underpowered to detect small differences, these results suggest little difference in outcome between the 2 treatments for anterior circulation aneurysms. This was not the case for the posterior circulation aneurysms, where coil embolization appeared to provide a sustained advantage over clipping. Aneurysm obliteration rates in BRAT were significantly lower and retreatment rates significantly higher in the patients undergoing coiling than in those undergoing clipping. However, despite the fact that retreatment rates were higher after coiling, no recurrent hemorrhages were known to have occurred in patients undergoing coiling in BRAT who were followed up for 6 years. Sufficient questions remain about the relative benefits of the 2 treatment modalities to warrant further well-designed randomized trials.

Type II endoleak prevention with coil embolization during endovascular aneurysm repair in high-risk patients

This study evaluated endoleak level and size decrease of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with coil embolization in patients at high risk for type II endoleak. Between 2009 and 2013, 83 of 187 patients (44.3%) who underwent EVAR for AAA also underwent coil embolization of the aneurysm sac immediately after complete stent graft release because of risk factors for type II endoleak, including absence of a circumferential thrombus, two or more pairs of patent lumbar arteries, or a patent inferior mesenteric artery. Coil embolization was achieved using a 4F catheter with a microcatheter placed between the stent graft and the aneurysm wall. Computed tomography and color duplex ultrasound imaging were performed 1, 6, 12, and 24 months later to look for an endoleak and assess aneurysm sac diameter. Mean follow-up was 24 ± 11 months (range, 6-53 months). A mean of 12 coils (range, 4-23) was used. Technical success was achieved in all patients, with no procedurally related complications. Follow-up computed tomography showed type II endoleak in one patient. Aneurysm sac diameter was significantly decreased after 6 months (P = .001), 12 months (P = .001), and 24 months (P = .001). Surgery was required in one patient for common femoral artery occlusion unrelated to the procedure and in another patient for distal type I endoleak. Aneurysm sac coil embolization during EVAR for patients at risk for type II endoleak is technically feasible, safe, and effective in preventing type II endoleak. This procedure leads to rapid AAA shrinkage. Thus, coil embolization could be used routinely to improve EVAR outcomes for patients at risk for type II endoleak.

Predictors of thromboembolism during coil embolization in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysm

To identify the incidence of thromboembolic complications based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to explore the potential risk factors for thromboembolism (TE) during the periprocedural period of elective coil embolization for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. We retrospectively reviewed all aneurysm cases treated with coil insertion between January 2008 and March 2011. Two hundred eighty-two coiling procedures for unruptured aneurysms were included in this study. The patients' demographic characteristics were documented and records reviewed for abnormalities in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) seen on post-procedure MRI, intraoperative thrombus formation, and clinical signs of stroke. Overall, there were 87 (30.9 %) procedure-related complications in 282 aneurysms treated: 2 (0.7 %) procedural ruptures, 5 (1.8 %) symptomatic infarctions, and 80 (28.3 %) asymptomatic infarctions. Thromboembolic events during the procedure were observed more often in the the hyperlipidemia group (32/71 aneurysms, 45.1 %) than in the normal lipid profile group (39/196 aneurysms, 25.6 %; p = 0.002; chi-squre test). The coiling technique and size of the aneurysm were also associated with TE (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004). Hyperlipidemia seems to be associated with a significant increase in the rate of thromboembolic events. In preventive procedures, modifiable risk factors should be managed to reduce complications. Although permanent deficits are rare, the high rate of thromboembolic events suggests that improvements in the technique, such as the addition of antiplatelet agents and the development of new embolic materials, are necessary.