Coil Embolization Group Research Articles

Second-stage pipeline embolization device treatment with coil embolization for large cerebral aneurysm prevents silent diffusion-weighted image ischemic infarction: a retrospective study

BackgroundSecond-stage flow diversion with coil embolization may improve occlusion outcomes and reduce periprocedural complications in patients with cerebral aneurysm. However, the actual cause behind this is unclear. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of second-stage pipeline embolization device (PED) and single-stage PED with coil embolization.ResultsOf the 22 treated patients with aneurysm, 10 and 12 were treated with second-stage PED and single-stage PED with coil embolization, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 29.6 months. The mean numbers of diffusion-weighted image (DWI)-positive spots on day 1 post-procedure were 4.9 and 10.8 in the second-stage and single-stage PED with coil embolization groups, respectively (P = 0.01). Deterioration of the modified Rankin scale score was not ≥ 2 in any patient during follow-up in the second-stage PED group but was observed in 16.7% of cases (2/12) in the single-stage PED with coil embolization group (P = 0.48). On follow-up angiography, complete occlusion was observed in all patients (10/10) in the second-stage PED group and 66.7% (8/12) in the single-stage PED with coil embolization group (P = 0.09).ConclusionsThe second-stage PED strategy significantly reduces the number of DWI high-intensity spots, leading to the prevention of ischemic complications. This strategy may help to prevent complications and reduce morbidity.

Effect of Intrathecal Urokinase Infusion on Cerebral Vasospasm After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Vasospasm following an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) causes serious neurological complications, despite surgical clipping of the aneurysm. Intrathecal urokinase (UK) infusion has been shown to effectively prevent symptomatic vasospasm in patients who have undergone endovascular obliteration of the ruptured aneurysms. To investigate whether intrathecal UK infusion can prevent symptomatic vasospasm in patients undergoing surgical or endovascular treatment. A total of 90 patients with severe aneurysmal SAH were enrolled and assigned to a surgical neck clipping (n= 56) or an endovascular coil embolization (n= 34) groups. After treatment, UK infusion from the lumbar drain was repeated in 32 patients in the surgical neck clipping group (group B) and all in the endovascular coil embolization group (group C) until complete resolution of the SAH was observed on computed tomography. The remaining 24 of the surgical neck clipping group, without UK infusion, were assigned to group A. Symptomatic vasospasm occurred in 7 (29.2%) patients in group A, 2 (6.3%) in group B, and none in group C (group A vs. group B [P=0.02]; group B vs. group C [P=0.14]). Excellent clinical outcomes (modified Rankin score, 0 or 1) were observed in 37.5%, 59.4%, and 76.5% of patients in group A, B, and C, respectively (group A vs. group B [P=0.11]). Clearance of SAH via intrathecal UK infusion significantly reduced symptomatic vasospasm in patients in both UK groups, resulting in better clinical outcomes.

Comparison of Pipeline Embolization and Coil Embolization for the Treatment of Large Unruptured Paraclinoid Aneurysms.

The efficacy of flow diversion (FD) in the treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms has been established. The pipeline embolization device (PED) is one of the most commonly used FD devices. Coil embolization is also useful for treating paraclinoid aneurysms. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of PED treatment and coil embolization for large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms. This was a single-center, retrospective study of large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms treated endovascularly between 2009 and 2019 (coil embolization between 2009 and 2015, and PED between 2015 and 2019). Cases with a follow-up period of less than 1 year and recurrence after coil embolization were excluded. The treatment outcomes between coil embolization and PED were compared. We investigated 45 patients with 45 large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms treated by endovascular surgery in our institution. Twenty-four patients were treated with coil embolization and 21 with PED. In the PED group, the device cost was significantly lower (2,770.4 ± 699.5 vs. 1941.2 ± 552.8 [1000 yen], P = 0.03), procedure duration was significantly shorter (155.4 ± 66.7 vs. 95.1 ± 35.4 min, P <0.01), and the numbers of re-treatments were lower than those in the coil embolization group (41.7 vs. 14.3%, P = 0.05). Both PED and coil embolization were effective and safe for large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms, and their treatment results were similar. The PED is more beneficial because of its lower cost, shorter procedure duration, and fewer retreatments, and is therefore more useful for the treatment of large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms.

Long‐term survival outcomes and prognostic factors related to ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A comparison of surgical and endovascular options in a propensity score–matched, nationwide population‐based cohort study

To determine the long-term survival outcomes of and prognostic factors for survival in patients with a ruptured intracranial aneurysm (RIA) who underwent endovascular coil embolization or surgical clipping. We selected patients who had received a diagnosis of RIA between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2017. Propensity score matching was performed, and Cox proportional hazards model curves were plotted to analyze all-cause mortality in patients undergoing different treatments. The matching process yielded a final cohort of 8102 patients (4051 and 4051 in endovascular coil embolization and surgical clipping groups, respectively) who were eligible for inclusion. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for endovascular coil embolization compared with surgical clipping were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.79-0.97). The aHRs for the ages of 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and ≥85years compared with the ages of 20 to 64years were 1.82 (95% CI, 1.60-2.07), 3.35 (95% CI, 2.93-3.84), and 6.99 (95% CI, 5.51-8.86), respectively. Surgical clipping; old age; male sex; treatment during 2011 to 2013; presence of diabetes, congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, or end-stage renal disease; history of stroke or transient ischemic attack; Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2; attendance of nonacademic hospitals; and low income were significant independent prognostic factors for poor survival. Compared with surgical clipping, endovascular coil embolization led to more favorable survival outcomes in patients with RIAs.

Flow-diverting device versus coil embolization for unruptured intracranial aneurysm: A meta-analysis.

Background:Both coil embolization (CE) and flow-diverting device (FDD) placement are widely used for treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the relative clinical safety and efficacy of FDD and CE for the treatment of unruptured IAs.Methods:The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies from the date of inception through April 2020. The primary endpoint for this meta-analysis was the 6-month rate of complete occlusion, while secondary endpoints included rates of retreatment, complications, and parental arterial patency.Results:This meta-analysis includes 8 studies, which included 839 total patients that underwent FDD and 2734 that underwent CE. FDD group exhibited a significantly higher pooled 6-month complete occlusion rate (P = .02). The subgroup analysis demonstrated that FDD treatment was associated with significantly higher pooled 6-month complete occlusion rates in patients with large or giant IAs (P < .00001), whereas no differences in 6-month complete occlusion rates were observed between the FDD and CE groups of patients with non-large/giant IAs (P = .83). The pooled retreatment (P = .16) and complication (P = .15) rates were comparable between 2 groups. The CE group exhibited significantly higher pooled parent artery patency rate (P = .01). The funnel plots did not reveal any evidence of publication bias.Conclusions:FDDs can be used to effectively and safely treat large and giant IAs, achieving higher rates of complete occlusion than CE treatment. For non-large/giant IAs, we observed comparable efficacy between FDD and CE treatments.

Long-Term Medical Resource Consumption between Surgical Clipping and Endovascular Coiling for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Propensity Score-Matched, Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study.

Purpose: To estimate long-term medical resource consumption in patients with subarachnoid aneurysmal hemorrhage (SAH) receiving surgical clipping or endovascular coiling. Patients and methods: From Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database, we enrolled patients with aneurysmal SAH who received clipping or coiling. After propensity score matching and adjustment for confounders, a generalized linear mixed model was used to determine significant differences in the accumulative hospital stay (days), intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and total medical cost for aneurysmal SAH, as well as possible subsequent surgical complications and recurrence. Results: The matching process yielded a final cohort of 8102 patients (4051 and 4051 in endovascular coil embolization and surgical clipping, respectively) who were eligible for further analysis. The mean accumulative hospital stay significantly differed between coiling (31.2 days) and clipping (46.8 days; p < 0.0001). After the generalized linear model adjustment of gamma distribution with a log link, compared with the surgical clipping procedure, the adjusted odds ratios (aOR; 95% confidence interval [CI]) of the medical cost of accumulative hospital stay for the endovascular coil embolization procedure was 0.63 (0.60, 0.66; p < 0·0001). The mean accumulative ICU stay significantly differed between the coiling and clipping groups (9.4 vs. 14.9 days; p < 0.0001). The aORs (95% CI) of the medical cost of accumulative ICU stay in the endovascular coil embolization group was 0.61 (0.58, 0.64; p < 0.0001). The aOR (95% CI) of the total medical cost of index hospitalization in the endovascular coil embolization group was 0·85 (0.82, 0.87; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Medical resource consumption in the coiling group was lower than that in the clipping group.

Mid-term Results of Coil Embolization Alone and Stent-assisted Coil Embolization for Renal Artery Aneurysms

Coil embolization (CE) alone and stent-assisted coil embolization (SCE) are two major endovascular techniques to treat renal artery aneurysms (RAAs). This study aimed at providing safety and efficacy data of CE and SCE for RAAs. Between August 2015 and June 2019, 40 RAA patients treated with CE or SCE were included in the retrospective study. Patients' demographics, clinical manifestations, aneurysm characteristics, treatment strategies, and follow-up results were collected and analyzed. There were 26 and 14 patients in the CE and SCE group, respectively. The mean aneurysm diameter was 2.5±1.5cm and 2.2±0.8cm (CE versus SCE, P=0.52). The neck width of the aneurysm was 0.63±0.37cm and 1.07±0.42cm (CE versus SCE, P=0.021). Technical success was achieved in 97.5% patients. No death or aneurysm rupture occurred. During the perioperative period, 12% and 7.1% patients suffered partial renal infarction (CE versus SCE, P=0.45). The mean duration of follow-up was 8.8±9.4months and 16.1±16.3months (CE versus SCE, P=0.158) by imaging and 20.8±11.3 and 22.7±16.5months by visit/telephone (CE versus SCE, P=0.703). During the follow-up, 17.4% patients in the CE group and 30.8% patients in the SCE group suffered partial renal infarction, while their overall renal function remained normal. In addition, there was no aneurysm recurrence, sac enlargement, or death in both groups. Both CE and SCE were safe and effective to treat RAAs. In addition, SCE may prevent coil migration in the wide neck aneurysm in selected patients.

Onyx versus coil embolization for the treatment of type II endoleaks

ObjectiveLittle evidence is available supporting the optimal treatment of type II endoleaks associated with aortic sac growth. Previous studies have lacked comparisons between treatment methods and long-term follow-up. The purpose of the present study was to review our center's experience with the treatment of type II endoleaks comparing Onyx (a liquid embolization agent consisting of ethylene vinyl alcohol; Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn) embolization and coil embolization. MethodsA retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a vascular surgery database was performed to identify all patients who had undergone embolization of a type II endoleak for aortic sac growth after endovascular aneurysm repair from 2005 to 2018. The Onyx and coil embolization groups were compared using univariate statistics. ResultsA total of 58 patients had undergone 77 embolization procedures for type II endoleaks with either Onyx (27 patients; 37 procedures) or coils (31 patients; 40 procedures). The average aneurysm size at embolization was larger in the Onyx group (77.9 ± 15.1 mm) compared with coil embolization (73.4 ± 11.9 mm). The mean follow-up was 57 months for the Onyx group and 74 months for the coil embolization group. Of the 27 patients who had undergone Onyx embolization, 2 (7.4%) had required graft explantation compared with 5 of the 31 patients (16.1%) who had undergone coil embolization (P = .33). The results of the per-patient analysis showed that the coil embolization group had a significantly greater rate of the need for further reintervention compared with the Onyx group (55% vs 19%; P < .01). Clinical success was observed in 13 patients (48%) in the Onyx embolization group compared with 10 patients (32%) in the coil embolization group (P = .04). Two patients in each group had presented with secondary rupture of the aneurysm sac after attempted embolization. ConclusionsType II endoleaks associated with sac growth treated with Onyx were less likely to require further reinterventions than were those treated with coil embolization. A trend was found toward a greater need for endovascular aneurysm repair explant after coil embolization. With a high rate of further reintervention and potential for sac rupture, diligent follow-up is required after attempted type II embolization, regardless of the technique used.

Dual antiplatelet treatment associated with reduced risk of symptomatic vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

ObjectiveCerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) are considered complications after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Several hypotheses involving platelet activation have been asserted in the pathophysiology of cerebral vasospasm and DCI. This study aimed to investigate the effect of dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) on symptomatic vasospasm and DCI in patients with aSAH.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on patients with aSAH from 2009 to 2018. The patients are divided into 2 groups according to the treatment method such as simple or balloon-assisted coil embolization group (SB coiling), and stent-assisted coil embolization group. Patients treated by SB coiling without DAPT were classified as the control group. Patients who required dual antiplatelet treatment due to stent-assisted coil embolization were classified as DAPT group. The incidence of symptomatic vasospasm and DCI was compared between the two groups.ResultsOf 743 patients with aSAH, 563 patients were treated with clipping, 115 patients treated with SB coiling, and 65 patients receive stent-assisted coiling. Among 115 patients underwent SB coiling, 14 patients were excluded by the exclusion criteria. Total number of control group (SB coiling) was 101, DAPT group (stent-assisted coiling) was 65. Depending on whether or not taking DAPT, the incidence of symptomatic vasospasm was lower in the DAPT group (p=0.010). DCI incidence was also lower in the DAPT group, which was statistically significant (p=0.029).ConclusionsDAPT reduces the frequency of symptomatic vasospasm and DCI in patients with aSAH in our single-center study. To warranting this topic, further, larger prospective and randomized studies should be needed.

The Fate of Unruptured Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Dissecting Aneurysm with Brain Stem Compression According to Different Treatment Modalities.

Unruptured intracranial vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms with brain stem compression are difficult to treat. In the present study, the clinical and radiologic outcomes of unruptured intracranial vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms with brain stem compression based on different treatment modalities were evaluated. This study included 28 patients with unruptured intracranial vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms with brain stem compression treated from January 2009 to December 2017. Treatment methods were observation (n = 6), stent-assisted coil embolization (n = 9), parent artery occlusion (n = 6), and flow diversion (n = 7). The data of baseline characteristics, change of aneurysm size, retreatment rate, stroke occurrence, and alteration of the mRS score were obtained from retrospective chart review. The initial size of dissecting aneurysms was largest in the flow diversion group (22.5 ± 7.7 mm), followed by parent artery occlusion (20.3 ± 8.4 mm), stent-assisted coil embolization (11.7 ± 2.2 mm), and observation (17.8 ± 5.5 mm; P = .01) groups. The reduction rate of aneurysm size was highest in the parent artery occlusion group (26.7 ± 32.1%), followed by flow diversion (14.1% ± 28.7%), stent-assisted coil embolization (-17.9 ± 30.3%), and observation (-31.5 ± 30.8%; P = .007) groups. Additional treatment was needed in the observation (4/6, 66.7%) and stent-assisted coil embolization (3/9, 33.3%; P = .017) groups. Improvement of the mRS score on follow-up was observed in the flow diversion (6/7, 85.7%) and parent artery occlusion (4/6, 66.7%) groups but not in the stent-assisted coil embolization and observation groups. A worsened mRS score was most common in the observation group (4/6, 66.7%), followed by stent-assisted coil embolization (3/9, 33.3%), parent artery occlusion (2/6, 33.3%), and flow diversion (0/7, 0%) groups. When treating intracranial vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms with brain stem compression, parent artery occlusion and flow diversion should be considered to reduce aneurysm size and improve the mRS score.

Treatment Outcomes of Cerebral Aneurysms Presenting with Optic Neuropathy: A Retrospective Case Series.

Background:Optic neuropathy due to an aneurysm is relatively rare, with only a few small case series on this topic, and no randomized trials having been published until now. As such, the functional prognosis and treatment for aneurysm-induced optic neuropathy remain controversial.Objective:We quantified optic nerve injuries using an objective index (the visual impairment score) and evaluated prognostic factors of postoperative visual function.Materials and Methods:Of 960 patients treated for an unruptured intracranial aneurysm, 18 (1.9%) patients had optic neuropathy. Visual acuity and visual field were assessed before surgery and 6 months’ postoperatively. Cases were classified on the basis of treatment modality (coil embolization or flow alteration [FA]) and prognostic factors of the two treatment groups.Results:Of the 18 patients with an intracranial aneurysm and optic neuropathy, 12 (67%) were treated using coil embolization and 6 (33%) were FA. Visual function improved after surgery in 8 patients (44%), 5 (42%) in the coil embolization group, and 3 (50%) in the FA group. The visual function remained stable after surgery in 6 (33%) patients and worsened in 4 (22%). Patients with an aneurysms <15 mm in size had a favorable outcome (P = 0.05).Conclusions:Surgical treatment improved vision in 44% of cases, with no difference in the prognosis of coil embolization and FA and no effect of the duration of symptoms on outcomes. Further, the prognosis of visual function recovery was better for aneurysms <15 mm in diameter.

Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Diverse Endovascular Treatments in Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm Involving the Origin of PICA

To determine clinical and radiologic outcomes of vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms involving posterior inferior cerebellar artery according to different types of endovascular treatment. This study included 18 vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (6 ruptured and 12 unruptured) involving posterior inferior cerebellar artery treated from January 2009 to December 2016. Treatments were multiple stenting, stent-assisted coil embolization, vertebral artery trapping with vertebral artery-posterior inferior cerebellar artery stenting, and Pipeline embolization. Clinical and radiologic information were obtained from retrospective chart review and radiologic review. Subarachnoid hemorrhage was diagnosed initially in 6 of 18 patients, and infarction was diagnosed initially in 2 patients. Multiple stenting was performed in 4 patients, including 1 (25%) who had cerebellar infarction and 1 (25%) who had recurrence. Stent-assisted coil embolization was performed in 8 patients, including 1 (12.5%) who had postoperative cerebellar infarction and 2 (25%) who had recurrence. Vertebral artery trapping with vertebral artery-posterior inferior cerebellar artery stenting was performed in 4 patients, including 1 (25%) who had postoperative cerebellar infarction. There was no recurrence (0%). Pipeline embolization was performed in 2 patients, including 1 (50%) who had recurrence. There was no postoperative infarction (0%). No subarachnoid hemorrhage occurred during follow-up. Deterioration in modified Rankin Scale score was found only in the stent-assisted coil embolization group (1/8; 12.5%). Vertebral artery trapping with vertebral artery-posterior inferior cerebellar artery stenting showed the lowest rate of aneurysm recurrence with high rate of minor infarction and favorable neurologic outcome. Stent-assisted coil embolization showed high recurrence rates with possible fatal disabling infarction.

Splenic Artery Embolization in Blunt Trauma: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparison of the Use of Gelatin Sponge Versus Coils.

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of gelatin sponge with that of coils for splenic artery embolization in the treatment of blunt splenic injury. A single-center retrospective review was performed with the records of 63 patients (45 men, 18 women; mean age, 45.5 years; range, 16-84 years) with blunt splenic injury treated at a tertiary care trauma center by splenic artery embolization with gelatin sponge (n = 30 patients) or metallic coils (n = 33 patients) between 2005 and 2014. The two groups had comparable median American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grades of IV and comparable angiographic appearances regarding active extravasation and pseudoaneurysm formation at preembolization splenic arteriography (p = 0.32). Clinical outcomes and procedure-related outcomes were evaluated. The success rates were similar in the two groups: splenic artery embolization failed in 6.6% (2/30) of patients in the gelatin sponge group and 12.1% (4/33) in the coil embolization group (p = 0.45; 95% CI, -30.1% to 19.2%). Major complications occurred in six patients (20.0%) in the gelatin sponge group and in six patients (18.1%) in the coil group (p = 0.85; 95% CI, -23.0% to 26.6%). Minor complications occurred in three patients (10.0%) in the gelatin sponge group and seven patients (21.2%) in the coil group (p = 0.21; 95% CI, -35.4% to 14.0%). Procedure time was significantly shorter in the gelatin sponge group (median, 32 minutes; interquartile range, 18-48 minutes) than in the coil group (median, 53 minutes; interquartile range, 30-76 minutes) (p = 0.01). Splenic artery embolization with gelatin sponge appears to be as effective and as safe as coil embolization and can be completed in a shorter time.

Influence of Diabetes Mellitus and Cigarette Smoking on Variability of the Clopidogrel-Induced Antiplatelet Effect and Efficacy of Active Management of the Target P2Y12 Reaction Unit Range in Patients Undergoing Neurointerventional Procedures

Optimal antiplatelet inhibition is essential in patients undergoing neurointerventional procedures; however, variability in response to clopidogrel can contribute to thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. The present study evaluated the influence of diabetes mellitus and cigarette smoking on clopidogrel reactivity. Between 2011 and 2013, 71 consecutive patients underwent aneurysmal coil embolization (CE) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) and received clopidogrel (75 mg daily) and aspirin (100 mg daily) before the treatment. The patients were divided into 2 groups: CE (n = 31) and CAS (n = 40). The patients underwent prospective assessment of preoperative platelet function using VerifyNow assay and received adjunctive cilostazol (200 mg daily, triple antiplatelet therapy) in case of clopidogrel hyporesponse. Patients with clopidogrel hyper-response underwent clopidogrel dose reduction (clopidogrel, 12.5-50 mg daily). Clopidogrel resistance was noted in 15 patients (37.5%) in the CAS group and in 4 patients (12.9%) in the CE group (P = .031). Clopidogrel hyper-response was noted in 2 patients (5%) in the CAS group and in 11 patients (54.8%) in the CE group (P < .001). There was a significant difference in the baseline clinical characteristics between the 2 groups. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, diabetes and age were independent predictors of clopidogrel hyporesponse, whereas current smoker was an independent predictor of clopidogrel hyper-response. Significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics were present when comparing patients undergoing endovascular treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms and carotid artery stenosis. Diabetes mellitus and current smoker status were independent factors related to reactivity to clopidogrel.

Prospective, Randomized Study of Coil Embolization versus Surefire Infusion System during Yttrium-90 Radioembolization with Resin Microspheres

PurposeTo compare standard coil embolization versus the use of an antireflux microcatheter (ARM) in patients undergoing planning angiography before selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). Materials and MethodsA prospective, single-center trial was performed in which 30 patients were randomly assigned to undergo SIRT with coil embolization or the use of an ARM. The coil group underwent detachable coil embolization of nontarget vessels, and the ARM group underwent infusion of macroaggregated albumin with use of an ARM system, without coil embolization. Single-photon emission computed tomography (CT)/CT was then performed to assess for nontarget distribution. The primary endpoint was fluoroscopy time during planning angiography. Secondary endpoints included deployment time, total procedure time, radiation dose–area product, contrast agent used, and adverse events. Endpoints were evaluated during planning angiography and SIRT. ResultsOver a 9-month period, 30 consecutive patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio between coil embolization and ARM groups. Technical success rates were 100% in both groups. Mean fluoroscopy time was significantly reduced in the ARM group versus the coil embolization group (1.8 min [range, 0.4–4.9 min] vs 6.0 min [range, 1.9–15.7 min]; P = .002). The planning procedure time (P < .001), deployment time (P < .001), dose–area product (P = .04), and amount of contrast agent used (P < .001) were also significantly less in the ARM group than in the coil embolization group. No nontarget distribution was detected in either group. There was no difference between groups in dose delivered on the day of SIRT (P = .71). There were no major or minor adverse events at 30 days. ConclusionsThe use of an ARM during planning angiography can significantly reduce fluoroscopy time, procedure time, and radiation dose.

Yttrium-90 resin microsphere radioembolization using an antireflux catheter: an alternative to traditional coil embolization for nontarget protection.

Serious complications can result from nontarget embolization during yttrium-90 (Y-90) transarterial radioembolization. Hepatoenteric artery coil embolization has been traditionally performed to prevent nontarget radioembolization. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved Surefire Infusion System (SIS) catheter, designed to prevent reflux, is an alternative to coils. The hypothesis that quantifiable SIS procedural parameters are comparable to coil embolization was tested. Fourteen patients aged 36-79 years with colorectal, neuroendocrine, hepatocellular, and other predominantly bilobar hepatic tumors who underwent resin microsphere Y-90 radioembolization using only the SIS catheter (n = 7) versus only detachable coils (n = 7) for nontarget protection were reviewed retrospectively. Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, contrast dose, radiation dose, and cost were evaluated. Multivariate analysis identified significant cohort differences in the procedural parameters evaluated (F(10, 3) = 10.39, p = 0.04). Between-group comparisons of the pretreatment planning procedure in the SIS catheter group compared to the coil embolization group demonstrated a significant reduction in procedure time (102.6 vs. 192.1 min, respectively, p = 0.0004), fluoroscopy time (14.3 vs. 49.7 min, respectively, p = 0.0016), and contrast material dose (mean dose of 174.3 vs. 265.0 mL, respectively, p = 0.0098). Procedural parameters were not significantly different between the two groups during subsequent dose delivery procedures. Overall cost of combined first-time radioembolization procedures was significantly less in the SIS group ($4252) compared to retrievable coil embolization ($11,123; p = 0.001). The SIS catheter results in a reduction in procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast material dose and may be an attractive cost-effective alternative to detachable coil embolization for prevention of nontarget radioembolization.

Balloon-augmented Onyx endovascular ligation: initial human experience and comparison with coil ligation

IntroductionCarotid artery sacrifice remains an important procedure for cerebral vascular disorders despite the development of new endovascular devices. Conventional carotid artery sacrifice with detachable coils alone often requires numerous coils...

Treatment of cerebral aneurysms in children: analysis of the Kids' Inpatient Database.

OBJECT.: Endovascular coiling and surgical clipping are viable treatment options of cerebral aneurysms. Outcome data of these treatments in children are limited. The objective of this study was to determine hospital mortality and complication rates associated with surgical clipping and coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms in children, and to evaluate the trend of hospitals' use of these treatments. The authors identified a cohort of children admitted with the diagnoses of cerebral aneurysms and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage from the Kids' Inpatient Database for the years 1998 through 2009. Hospital-associated complications and in-hospital mortality were compared between the treatment groups and stratified by aneurysmal rupture status. A multivariate regression analysis was used to identify independent variables associated with in-hospital mortality. The Cochrane-Armitage test was used to assess the trend of hospital use of these operations. A total of 1120 children were included in this analysis; 200 (18%) underwent aneurysmal clipping and 920 (82%) underwent endovascular coiling. Overall in-hospital mortality was higher in the surgical clipping group compared with the coil embolization group (6.09% vs 1.65%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.52, 95% CI 0.97-6.53, p = 0.05). The risk of postoperative stroke or hemorrhage was similar between the two treatment groups (p = 0.86). Pulmonary complications and systemic infection were higher in the surgical clipping population (p < 0.05). The rate of US hospitals' use of endovascular coiling has significantly increased over the years included in this study (p < 0.0001). Teaching hospitals were associated with a lower risk of death (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.46; p = 0.001). Although both treatments are valid, endovascular coiling was associated with fewer deaths and shorter hospital stays than clip placement. The trend of hospitals' use of coiling operations has increased in recent years.

Abstract No. 475 - Impact of a novel balloon occlusion technique on fluoroscopy time and radiation dose during Y90 radioembolization

No. 475 Impact of a novel balloon occlusion technique on fluoroscopy time and radiation dose during Y90 radioembolization Black, A.K. Jones, A. Mahvash, B.C. Odisio, R. Avritscher, J. Ensor, Jr., R. Murthy, J.R. Steele, Jr.; Interventional Radiology, UT MD Anderson, Houston, TX; Imaging Physics, UT MD Anderson, Houston, TX; Biostatistics, UT MD Anderson, Houston, TX Purpose: To assess the impact of a novel balloon occlusion technique on time and dose metrics during Y90 radioembolization (Y90 RE) Materials and Methods: Prior to July 2011, Y90 RE was performed following standard coil embolization of all hepatoenteric collaterals. After July 2011, a technique was introduced whereby a temporary occlusion balloon was inflated in the common hepatic artery, resulting in hepatopedal flow in hepatoenteric collaterals, eliminating the need for coil embolization. A retrospective review of sequential patients who underwent Y90 RE before and after the introduction of the balloon occlusion technique was performed. Data were gathered from the radiology information system and the electronic medical record. Only patients with Michel’s classification type 1 anatomy were included. Results: 22 coil embolization patients and 21 balloon occlusion patients were included. The logarithms of the data were analyzed using two-tailed t-tests as the data followed log-normal distributions. The geometric means of fluoroscopy time (FT, 30.5 vs 13.9 min, -54%), dose area product (DAP, 735.0 vs 597.3 Gy-cm2, -19%), reference air kerma (Kar, 3,006 vs 2,397 mGy, -20%), and number of DSA runs (#DSA, 19.5 vs 18.0, -7.7%) all decreased in the balloon occlusion group versus the coil embolization group, however only the decrease in FT was statistically significant (FT: po0.0001; DAP: p1⁄40.261; Ka,r: p1⁄40.202; #DSA: p1⁄40.479). The lack of significance of the decreases in DAP and Kar was attributed to the much lower Kar rate in fluoroscopy compared to DSA (50-80x), and the fact that a similar number of angiograms are acquired regardless of the technique used. Conclusion: Use of a temporary occlusion balloon catheter versus coil embolization significantly decreased fluoroscopy time during Y90 RE. A larger sample size is necessary to determine if this technique results in reductions in DAP and Kar that are significant.

Endothelial Cell Proliferation in Swine Experimental Aneurysm after Coil Embolization

After coil embolization, recanalization in cerebral aneurysms adversely influences long-term prognosis. Proliferation of endothelial cells on the coil surface may reduce the incidence of recanalization and further improve outcomes after coil embolization. We aimed to map the expression of proliferating tissue over the aneurysmal orifice and define the temporal profile of tissue growth in a swine experimental aneurysm model. We compared the outcomes after spontaneous thrombosis with those of coil embolization using histological and morphological techniques. In aneurysms that we not coiled, spontaneous thrombosis was observed, and weak, easily detachable proliferating tissue was evident in the aneurysmal neck. In contrast, in the coil embolization group, histological analysis showed endothelial-like cells lining the aneurysmal opening. Moreover, immunohistochemical and morphological analysis suggested that these cells were immature endothelial cells. Our results indicated the existence of endothelial cell proliferation 1 week after coil embolization and showed immature endothelial cells in septal tissue between the systemic circulation and the aneurysm. These findings suggest that endothelial cells are lead to and proliferate in the former aneurysmal orifice. This is the first examination to evaluate the temporal change of proliferating tissue in a swine experimental aneurysm model.