Cohort 2a Research Articles

Triple combination of vemurafenib, cobimetinib, and atezolizumab in real clinical practice in the Russian Federation: results of the A1 cohort of the ISABELLA study.

Among several treatment options for BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma, a combination of BRAF inhibitor, MEK inhibitor, and anti-PDL1 antibody seems to be a new emergent approach recently registered in the Russian Federation. It is still not clear which patient population benefits more from this simultaneous use of three drugs instead of its sequencing. This study aimed to evaluate patients' characteristics treated in real practice in 14 Russian regions by triple combination and to analyze their outcomes depending on biomarkers (PD-L1 expression). This was a part (cohort A1) of a prospective non-interventional study of clinical outcomes and biomarkers in patients with skin melanoma. Patients were included in cohort A1 if combination treatment with vemurafenib (vem) + cobimetinib (cobi) + atezolizumab (atezo) was initiated no earlier than 12 weeks (84 days) prior to written informed consent to participate in this study. The index event was the initiation of therapy with all three drugs vem + cobi + atezo (i.e., triple combination). The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was the 24-month overall survival (OS), defined as the time from the index date to the date of death from any cause. If the patient did not experience an event, the OS will be censored at the date of the last contact. Objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), and progression-free survival (PFS) in the Intention to treat (ITT) population, in biomarker positive population, and in population with brain metastases were also evaluated. Quality of life questionnaires were pre-planned by protocol if it was a part of routine practice. Adverse events were also collected. Between March 2021 and May 2023, 59 patients were enrolled in 19 centers from 14 regions of Russia. Thirty-one of 59 (52.4%) patients had central nervous system metastases, and 18 of 31 (58.4%) were symptomatic. Forty of 59 patients (68%) received the triple combination as the first-line treatment. The median follow-up period was 16.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.8-19.8] months. The mean duration of therapy with this regimen was 9.95 months (95% CI 7.48-13.8). ORR was 55.1%; progression as the best outcome was seen in 16.3%. The median DoR was 12.95 months (95% CI 11.0-14.8 months), with a median of 20.3 months (95% CI 9.1-31.5 months) when triple therapy was administered in the first-line treatment. In patients with brain metastases (N = 31), ORR was 45.1%; the median DoR was 12.95 (95% CI 11.0-14.8 months). The median PFS in the entire population was 13.6 months (95% CI 8.6-18.6); the 24-month PFS was 22%. The estimated median OS in the entire population was 15.8 months (95% CI NA); 24-month OS was 45% (95% CI 0.32-0.64). In multivariate Cox regression model, biomarkers of interest [lactate dehydrogenase, Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)] did not have statistically significant impact on PFS, OS, or DoR probably due to high data missing rate. No unexpected adverse events were reported. Grades 3-4 AEs were seen in 23 of 59 patients (38%) with most common were skin and liver toxicity. Triple combination of atezolizumab, vemurafenib, and cobimetinib had proven its efficacy and tolerability in real settings. No impact of potential predictive biomarkers was seen (NCT05402059).

Safety and efficacy of luspatercept for the treatment of anemia in patients with myelofibrosis

AbstractThe ACE-536-MF-001 trial enrolled patients with myelofibrosis (n = 95) into 4 cohorts: patients in cohorts 1 and 3A were non–transfusion dependent (NTD) and had anemia; patients in cohorts 2 and 3B were transfusion dependent (TD); and patients in cohort 3A/3B had stable ruxolitinib treatment before and during the study. All patients received luspatercept (1.0-1.75 mg/kg, 21-day cycles). Treatment was extended if clinical benefit was observed at day 169. The primary end point was anemia response rate (NTD, ≥1.5 g/dL hemoglobin increase from baseline; TD, transfusion-independence) over any 12-week period during the primary treatment period (weeks 1-24). Overall, 14% of patients in cohorts 1 and 3A, 10% in cohort 2, and 26% in cohort 3B met the primary end point. In cohorts 1 and 3A (NTD), 27% and 50% of patients, respectively, had mean hemoglobin increase of ≥1.5 g/dL from baseline. Among TD patients, ∼50% had ≥50% reduction in transfusion burden. Reduction in total symptom score was observed in all cohorts, with the greatest response rate seen in cohort 3A. Overall, 94% of patients had ≥1 adverse event (AE); 47% had ≥1 treatment-related AE (TRAE; 11% grade ≥3), most frequently hypertension (18%), managed with medical intervention. One patient had a serious TRAE leading to luspatercept discontinuation. Nine patients died on treatment (unrelated to study drug). In most patients, ruxolitinib dose and spleen size remained stable. In patients with myelofibrosis, luspatercept improved anemia and transfusion burden across cohorts; the safety profile was consistent with previous studies. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03194542.

TBCRC 048 (olaparib expanded) expansion cohorts: Phase 2 study of olaparib monotherapy in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with germline (g) mutations in PALB2 or somatic (s) mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2.

1021 Background: TBCRC 048 is an investigator-initiated proof of principle phase II trial that demonstrated responses with monotherapy olaparib in MBC pts with g PALB2 or s BRCA mutations. Here we report results of the expansion cohorts for additional pts with g PALB2(Cohort 1a) or s BRCA (Cohort 2a) mutations. Methods: 24 MBC pts with g PALB2m and 30 pts with s BRCAm were enrolled in the expansion cohorts from Sept 2020 to Oct 2023.Eligibility included: MBC with measurable disease; documented g PALB2m or s BRCAm (with normal g BRCA testing); progression on < 2 metastatic chemotherapy regimens. Prior PARP inhibitor or progression on platinum was not allowed. Patients received olaparib 300 mg bid until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The null hypothesis for each expansion cohort [≤ 30% objective response rate (ORR)] would be rejected if > 13 responses were seen. Secondary endpoints include clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 18 weeks, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR) and whether the mutant allele frequency (MAF) is significantly higher in responders than in non-responders. Enrollment to the g PALB2 cohort was closed early due to slow enrollment. PFS and DOR were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Association between MAF and response status was assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: In Cohort 1a (g PALB2, n=24), median age was 52.5 years (range: 26-86). 19 pts had ER+ HER2-negative, 2 HER2-positive, and 3 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). There were 18 confirmed responses for ORR of 75% (80% CI: 60.2%-86.3%); CBR at 18 weeks was 83.3% (90% CI: 65.8%-94.1%). Median PFS was 9.6 months (90% CI: 8.3-12.4). Median DOR was 7.1 months (90% CI: 5.6-11.0). In Cohort 2a (s BRCA1/2, n=30) 15 pts had s BRCA1m and 15 s BRCA2m. 23 pts had ER+ HER2-negative, 3 HER2-positive, and 4 TNBC. There were 11 confirmed responses for ORR of 36.7% (80% CI: 24.8%-50%). CBR was 53.3% (90% CI: 37%-69.2%) and median PFS was 5.6 months (90% CI: 3.0-8.3). Median DOR was 12.4 months (90% CI: 4.3-not reached). One additional pt with a s BRCAm had a PR, which was not confirmed. Clinical and molecular factors associated with response to olaparib are being evaluated. MAF was available and evaluable for 33 of the 46 pts in Cohorts 2 plus 2a who had s BRCAm identification by tumor biopsy. The mean MAF was 43% in responders and 39 % in non-responders (p=0.7), which was not significantly different. Conclusions: The notable ORR (75%) with olaparib in this second cohort of women with MBC and g PALB2m was again demonstrated.Olaparib activity inMBC pts with s BRCAm was also confirmed, though identifying predictors of response for these pts is of critical importance to distinguish those more likely to respond to PARP inhibition. Clinical trial information: NCT02032823 .

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in US patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) and anti–PD-(L)1 treatment.

8627 Background: Effective treatment options for advanced or metastatic NSCLC are limited, especially for pts who progress after treatment with PBC and an anti–programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) or ligand 1 (PD-L1) regimen. Examining real-world treatment patterns and long-term outcomes, we report on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in pts with NSCLC who previously received PBC and anti–PD-(L)1 regimens. Methods: This study used the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record–derived deidentified database. Pts included in the analysis were ≥18 years old with an initial diagnosis of advanced or metastatic NSCLC and an ECOG PS of 0 or 1 who had received prior PBC and anti–PD-(L)1 therapy in 1 (in combination) or 2 (in sequence) lines and had initiated ≥1 subsequent line of treatment between 2018 and 2023; the start date of subsequent treatment (defined as the index regimen) was the index date. Pts were followed up until death or last available data through Mar 31, 2023. Pt characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were analyzed for the overall pt group and according to initial treatment cohort (cohort 1: first-line [1L] PBC plus anti–PD-(L)1; cohort 2a: 1L PBC and second-line [2L] anti–PD-(L)1; or cohort 2b: 1L anti-PD-(L)1 and 2L PBC). PFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Of 1793 pts, most were in cohort 1 (73.5%), with fewer pts in cohorts 2a (22.5%) and 2b (4.1%). The majority of pts in cohort 2b had PD-L1 ≥50% (n = 57, 78.1%), while the percentage was lower in cohorts 1 (n = 262, 19.9%) and 2a (n = 72, 17.9%). Most pts (n = 1626, 90.7%) had stage IV disease. Median time from advanced diagnosis to index date was 10.5 months (range, 1.1-103.8); median follow-up from index date was 7.8 months (range, 0.0-65.0). A broad range of treatments were used after PBC and anti–PD-(L)1 regimens; among all pts, the most common were docetaxel + ramucirumab and docetaxel monotherapy. Among all pts, median PFS and OS from the time of starting these index regimens were 5.29 and 11.20 months, respectively; PFS and OS were similar across cohorts. Conclusions: A broad range of subsequent treatments were used following PBC and anti–PD-(L)1 regimens, most commonly docetaxel with or without ramucirumab. Short median PFS and OS underscore a significant unmet need among pts previously treated with PBC and anti–PD-(L)1. [Table: see text]

Sacituzumab tirumotecan (SKB264/MK-2870) in combination with KL-A167 (anti-PD-L1) as first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC from the phase II OptiTROP-Lung01 study.

8502 Background: Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (SKB264/MK-2870)is a TROP2 ADC developed with novel linker to conjugate the payload, a belotecan-derivative topoisomerase I inhibitor. The hydrolytically linker permits both extracellular pH-sensitive cleavage and intracellular enzymatic cleavage to release the membrane permeable payload enabling the “bystander effect”. Here, we report the initial results from a phase II study of SKB264 combined with KL-A167 in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC (OptiTROP-Lung01, NCT05351788). Methods: Pts with treatment naive advanced NSCLC without actionable genomic alterations were enrolled to receive SKB264 5 mg/kg Q3W + KL-A167 1200 mg Q3W (cohort 1A) or SKB264 5 mg/kg Q2W + KL-A167 900 mg Q2W (cohort 1B) in a non-randomized manner until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor assessments based on RECIST 1.1 were performed every 6 weeks by investigators. Results: As of 02 Jan 2024, 40 and 63 pts have been enrolled in cohort 1A and 1B. Median ages were 63/63 years; 97.5%/85.7% had ECOG PS of 1; 30.0%/33.3%, 32.5%/30.2% and 37.5%/36.5% of pts had PD-L1 expression < 1%, 1%–49% and ≥ 50% of tumor cells by IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay, respectively. In cohorts 1A/1B, the most common Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutrophil count decreased (30.0%/30.2%), white blood cell count decreased (5.0%/17.5%), anemia (5.0%/15.9%), rash (5.0%/6.3%) and drug eruption (7.5%/0). TRAE leading to discontinuation of SKB264 occurred in 1 pt of cohort 1B due to drug hypersensitivity, and there were no treatment-related deaths. After median follow up of 14.0 mos and 6.9 mos for cohort 1A and 1B, the ORR was 48.6% (18/37, 2 pending confirmation), DCR was 94.6% and median PFS was 15.4 mos (95% CI: 6.7, NE) with 6-mo PFS rate of 69.2% for cohort 1A ; the ORR was 77.6% (45/58, 5 pending confirmation), DCR was 100% and median PFS was not reached with 6-mo PFS rate of 84.6% for cohort 1B. Additional subgroup analyses are shown in the Table. Conclusions: SKB264 in combination with KL-A167 demonstrated promising efficacy results in treatment naive advanced NSCLC with manageable safety profile. SKB264 Q2W was recommended for further investigation. A Phase 3 study of SKB264 Q2W plus pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab in 1L metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% (NCT06170788) is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05351788 . [Table: see text]

Efficacy and safety of lifileucel, an autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte cell therapy, and pembrolizumab in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive unresectable or metastatic melanoma: Updated results from IOV-COM-202 cohort 1A.

9505 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are front-line standard-of-care treatment (tx) for advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma. Despite recent advances in front-line tx, a majority of patients (pts) do not achieve long-term benefit. Lifileucel, a one-time autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy, potentially induces durable responses in pts with advanced melanoma previously treated with ICI. This study evaluates lifileucel combined with anti-PD-1 therapy in front-line advanced melanoma. Methods: IOV-COM-202 (NCT03645928) Cohort 1A assesses the efficacy and safety of lifileucel and pembrolizumab (pembro) in pts with ICI-naive unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Pts may have received BRAF/MEK inhibitor tx if BRAF mutation-positive. Eligible pts must have ≥1 resectable lesion (≥1.5 cm diameter) for 22-day cryopreserved lifileucel manufacturing, and ≥1 measurable lesion for response assessment per RECIST v1.1. The tx regimen consists of pembro, nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine), a single lifileucel infusion (1 × 109 – 150 × 109 cells), ≤6 doses of IL-2 (600,000 IU/kg IV), and continued pembro until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity for ≤24 months. The endpoints are investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). Results: As of 22-Dec-2023, 22 pts with a median (range) age of 48.5 (18–68) years received lifileucel and pembro. At baseline, the median (range) target lesion sum of diameters was 54.5 (14–355) mm; 7 (31.8%) pts had liver lesions. Metastatic staging at study entry was as follows: 4 (18.2%) had M1a, 2 (9.1%) had M1b, 10 (45.5%) had M1c, and 2 (9.1%) had M1d. Eight (36.4%) pts had V600 BRAF mutations; 3 (13.6%) pts had prior BRAF/MEK inhibitor tx. Confirmed ORR was 63.6% (14/22), including 22.7% (5/22) CR and 40.9% (9/22) PR; 6 pts (27.3%) had SD. Median time to initial response was 2.5 months. All response evaluable pts demonstrated regression of target lesions. At a median follow-up of 17.2 months, median duration of response was not reached. Responses deepened over time; 10/14 (71.4%) pts had ongoing response and 8/14 (36.4%) pts had response ≥12 months. TEAEs were consistent with the underlying disease and known safety profiles of pembro, nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion, and IL-2. Most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were thrombocytopenia (68.2%), neutropenia (50.0%), and anemia (45.5%). Conclusions: These results demonstrate encouraging efficacy and durability for the combination of lifileucel and pembro and support its further evaluation in pts with untreated advanced melanoma in the phase 3 study TILVANCE-301 (NCT05727904). Clinical trial information: NCT03645928 .

Abstract PO1-18-04: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + decitabine followed by standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced HER2- breast cancer (NCT02957968)

Abstract Background: Higher levels of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in breast cancers are associated with increased likelihood of pathologic complete response (pCR) to chemotherapy and improved outcomes. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) can augment immune responses to cancers by upregulating tumor antigen and MHC expression, decreasing numbers and activity of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC), and increasing responsiveness of T lymphocytes. We have shown that the DNMTi decitabine augments the effectiveness of immunotherapy against murine triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) using murine 4T1 and E0771 mammary carcinoma models. Methods: In a single-arm phase 2 study, patients with HER2-negative breast cancer who were candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) received decitabine (15 mg/m2 × 4 doses over 5 days) followed by 2 doses of pembrolizumab (pembro) (200 mg, 2 weeks apart) – collectively, window immunotherapy – prior to starting NCT. Two research biopsies were obtained: 1 prior to the window immunotherapy and 1 afterwards, prior to starting NCT. Biopsies were analyzed using established procedures to quantify sTILs and PD-L1 expression. Patients proceeded to NCT and tumor resection per standard of care and were followed up for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and response. The primary endpoint was change in sTILs. Key secondary endpoints were occurrence of irAEs and pCR following neoadjuvant treatment. After the study was opened, reported results of a phase 3 trial (KEYNOTE 522) led to allowing patients with TNBC to receive additional pembro (200 mg q3w) concurrently with standard NCT and adjuvantly following resection (Cohort A2). Results: 46 patients (median age 54.5 yrs, range 28-72; 71.7% White, 28.3% Black; 100% female) were enrolled and treated on study. 21 patients had TNBC and did not receive neoadjuvant pembro concurrently with NCT nor adjuvant pembro (Cohort A), 7 patients had TNBC and did receive neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant pembro (Cohort A2), and 18 patients were ER+ or PR+ and received neither concurrent nor adjuvant pembro (Cohort B). Blood samples collected after decitabine administration before the first pembro dose showed a 59% decrease (P< 0.01) in monocytic MDSCs compared to baseline; decrease in granulocytic MDSCs was not statistically significant. 37 patients had paired biopsies adequate for sTIL evaluation with a mean change from 23.4% to 30.3% (absolute change 6.9%, P< 0.001). Cohorts A/A2 experienced an absolute sTIL increase of 7.4% (P< 0.01); Cohort B experienced absolute sTIL increase of 6.1% (P=0.01). PD-L1 expression in tumors (H-score using MoAb 22C3 clone) increased by 43% (P< 0.01) across all cohorts. 16 of the 39 patients (41.0%) who proceeded to resection achieved pCR (n=12 of 27 [44.4%] in Cohorts A/A2 and n=4 of 13 [30.8%] in Cohort B). The most frequently reported irAEs were adrenal insufficiency (n=5, 10.9%), maculopapular rash (n=3, 6.5%), and hypothyroidism (n=3, 6.5%). Conclusions: Treatment in the pre-neoadjuvant window with decitabine and pembro could potentially sensitize breast cancers to standard NCT by recruitment of TILs to the tumor tissue. The treatment was well -tolerated at the tested doses. Funding: financial support and drug (pembrolizumab) were provided by Merck Citation Format: Harry Bear, Xiaoyan Deng, Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, Michael Idowu, Maciej Kmieciak, Monique Williams, Giovanni Archer, Lindsey Gwaltney, Patrick Dillon, Daniel Flora, Daniel Stover, Andrew Poklepovic, Mary Hackney, Masey Ross, Hetal Vachhani, Raphael Louie, Kandace McGuire, Amelia Grover, Tasnim Rahman, Amber Hendrix. Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + decitabine followed by standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced HER2- breast cancer (NCT02957968) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-18-04.

Abstract PO2-11-06: Anti-Müllerian hormone in Young women with breast CAncer to predict permanent loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy (AMYCA): a biomarker analysis of the BETH and KAITLIN trials

Abstract Background: The ability to predict and identify ovarian function loss accurately after anticancer treatment is important for appropriate oncofertility counseling and to aid in therapy decision making for young women with early breast cancer (eBC). Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) has been proposed as both a pre- and post-treatment predictor of subsequent permanent loss of ovarian function. The present biomarker analysis conducted within two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a large and well-characterized patient population with HER2+ eBC receiving homogeneous treatment aimed to assess AMH use, alone and in combination with other hormonal biomarkers, for predicting loss of ovarian function at 36 months from randomization, i.e. approximately 2 years after end of therapy. Methods: BETH (NCT00625898) and KAITLIN (NCT01966471) were RCTs investigating adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) plus anti-HER2 therapy in high-risk HER2+ eBC patients. For the purpose of the present analysis, only samples of patients receiving currently adopted treatments were used, i.e. cohort 1A (6 cycles of docetaxel/carboplatin+trastuzumab (T)) and cohort 2A (3 cycles of docetaxel plus T followed by 3 cycles of anthracycline- and cyclophosphamide-based CT) of BETH trial, and arm 1 (3-4 cycles of anthracycline- and cyclophosphamide-based CT followed by 3-4 cycles of taxane plus T plus pertuzumab (P)) of KAITLIN trial. Women selected for this analysis were ≤45 years with known premenopausal status, available serum samples at baseline (pre-treatment) and/or end of therapy and 36 months (± 6 months) from randomization (i.e. min of 2 samples in all cases). Selected samples were centrally tested measuring AMH, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol (E2) using Roche Elecsys assays. Permanent ovarian loss was defined as FSH >25 IU/L and E2 < 110 pmol/L at 36 months. Results: Of 194 included patients, 62 were from BETH and 132 from KAITLIN. 139 (71.6%) received both taxane and anthracycline- and cyclophosphamide-based CT and 55 (28.4%) taxane only. Pertuzumab was used in addition to trastuzumab in 132 (68.0%) patients. AMH values declined from baseline median 8.44 pmol/L to undetectable levels in many women at end of therapy (median 0.08 pmol/L), with partial recovery at 36 months (median 0.14 pmol/L). Ovarian loss at 3 years was observed in 56 women with AMH available at baseline (29.5%) and in 52 women with AMH available at end of therapy (29.7%). For prediction of ovarian loss, in ROC analysis, AMH measured at baseline showed AUC 0.784 (internally validated using bootstrap: 0.783). While age influenced risk of ovarian loss, addition to AMH only slightly improved AUC to 0.800 (internal validation: 0.795) while addition of baseline FSH and E2 did not improve prediction. AMH measured at the end of therapy showed AUC 0.741 (internal validation: 0.742), which increased slightly to 0.785(internal validation: 0.781) with addition of age but without improved prediction with the addition of FSH and E2. The combination of AMH at baseline and end of therapy increased prediction slightly to 0.808 (internal validation 0.806) and with addition of age added to 0.820 (internal validation: 0.806). Conclusions: These results support the use of pretreatment measurement of AMH in predicting loss of ovarian function in women withHER2+ eBC aged ≤45 receiving CT and anti-HER2 therapy. Measurement of AMH at end of treatment was comparably valuable to pretreatment and added slightly to the value of pretreatment sampling. Inclusion of ovarian function assessment by measuring AMH before commencing treatment can inform subsequent risk of ovarian function loss with value for fertility preservation counselling and treatment decisions. Further validation is required in larger cohorts. Citation Format: Matteo Lambertini, Deirdre Allegranza, Ruediger Laubender, Nadia Harbeck, Sandra Swain, Charles Geyer, Dennis Slamon, Gabriella Bobba, Chiara Lambertini, Sanne Lysbet De Haas, Eleonora Restuccia, Ines Vaz Luis, David Cameron, Ian Krop, Eric Winer, Richard Anderson. Anti-Müllerian hormone in Young women with breast CAncer to predict permanent loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy (AMYCA): a biomarker analysis of the BETH and KAITLIN trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-11-06.

Abstract PO2-19-03: Phase 2 study of response-guided neoadjuvant sacituzumab govitecan in patients with localized breast cancer (NeoSTAR)

Abstract Background: Optimizing treatments for localized breast cancer is key to preventing metastatic recurrences and reducing mortality. Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate in which the topoisomerase 1 inhibitor SN-38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan) is coupled to a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the antigen Trop-2, which is highly expressed in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). SG is FDA approved for patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and TNBC. However, efficacy in localized BC is not known. The NeoSTAR clinical trial is evaluating SG in the neoadjuvant (NA) setting for participants with localized breast cancer. Cohort A1 evaluating NA SG monotherapy in localized TNBC is completed, and now cohorts A2 (SG + pembrolizumab (P) for TNBC), B1 (SG monotherapy for HR+ BC), and C (SG + P for HER2- inflammatory breast cancer (IBC)) are enrolling. Trial design: This is a single-arm phase II study of NA SG or SG + P with multiple cohorts across different breast cancer subtypes. In all cohorts, SG is administered via an IV infusion on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle at a starting dose of 10 mg/kg for 4 cycles. For cohorts A2 and C, pembrolizumab is given on day 1 of each cycle. For A2 and B1, after 4 cycles, participants who have biopsy-proven residual disease will have the option to receive additional standard NA therapy at the discretion of the treating physician and subsequently proceed to surgery. Those with a complete response on imaging may proceed directly to surgery. If pathological complete response (pCR) is achieved after 4 cycles of SG + P, participants on A2 will remain on study and receive adjuvant weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin for 12 weeks along with continuation of P to complete a total of one year of the PD-1 inhibitor; participants on B1 will receive adjuvant therapy at the discretion of the treating physician, with the option to continue P to complete a total of one year. On cohort C, after 4 cycles of SG + P, dose-dense doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide + P for 4 cycles will be given before considering surgery. A baseline research biopsy is required for all cohorts, as well as tissue collection following treatment with SG (either at surgery or via biopsy prior to additional NA therapy). Eligibility criteria: Participants ≥ 18 years of age with previously untreated localized breast cancer as determined by the local institution will be enrolled. For A2, participants must either have a primary tumor >2 cm or be node positive. For B1, participants with anatomic clinical stage II-III breast cancer with primary tumor > 1.5 cm and high genomic risk are eligible. For the IBC cohort (C), participants with T4d and any N are eligible. An ECOG performance score of 0 or 1, and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function is required. Study Objectives: The primary objective is to assess the pCR rate in breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/isN0) with SG + P (A2), SG (B1), or SG + P followed by AC + P (C). Secondary objectives include assessment of overall response rate, evaluation of the safety and tolerability of SG or SG + P (CTCAE v5.0), event-free survival (EFS), and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30). Exploratory objectives include assessment of potential predictive biomarkers, including Trop-2 expression, DNA damage response markers and immunological markers, as well as changes in cell free DNA with SG. Statistical methods: The primary analysis is based on the estimated pCR rate with SG or SG + P and will be provided as a proportion (with two-sided 95% confidence interval). Each cohort will follow a Simon two-stage design. EFS will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and descriptive statistics. Target Accrual: 50 participants (A2), 56 participants (B1), 39 participants (C) Contact: Dr. Laura Spring (LSpring@mgh.harvard.edu) Clinicaltrials.gov #: NCT04230109 Citation Format: Laura Spring, Ana Garrido-Castro, Filipa Lynce, Nadine Tung, Rachel Abelman, Lianne Ryan, Megan Moran, Elizabeth Mittendorf, Leif Ellisen, Sara Tolaney, Aditya Bardia. Phase 2 study of response-guided neoadjuvant sacituzumab govitecan in patients with localized breast cancer (NeoSTAR) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-19-03.

Prevalence of elevated lipoprotein(a) in cardiac rehabilitation patients - results from a large-scale multicentre registry in Germany.

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction and aortic valve stenosis. European guidelines recommend assessing it at least once in a lifetime, particularly in premature atherosclerotic heart disease. A non-interventional registry was conducted at MEDIAN rehabilitation facilities in Germany to assess the frequency of Lp(a) testing in referring acute care hospitals and the prevalence of elevated Lp(a) levels in aortic valve stenosis or premature myocardial infarction. All consecutive patients referred after coronary intervention or aortic valve surgery were included in four cohorts: aortic valve intervention (cohort 1), current/previous myocardial infarction at < 60 years of age (cohorts 2a/2b), and myocardial infarction at ≥ 60 years of age (control). The analysis included 3393 patient records (cohort 1, n = 1063; cohort 2a, n = 1351; cohort 2b, n = 381; control, n = 598). Lp(a) had been determined at the referring hospital in 0.19% (cohort 1), 4.96% (cohort 2a), 2.36% (cohort 2b), and 2.01% (control) of patients. Lp(a) levels were > 50 mg/dL or > 125 nmol/L in 28.79% (cohort 1), 29.90% (cohort 2a), and 36.48% (cohort 2b; p < 0.001) compared to 24.25% (control). Family history of premature cardiovascular disease was reported in 13.45% (cohort 1), 38.56% (cohort 2a), and 32.81% (cohort 2b) compared to 17.89% (control; p < 0.05 for each comparison). Lp(a) had been rarely assessed in acute management of aortic valve stenosis or premature myocardial infarction despite expanding scientific evidence and guideline recommendation. Given the above-average incidence of elevated Lp(a) levels, awareness for Lp(a) has to increase substantially to better identify and manage high-risk patients.

Interferon-gamma signature as prognostic and predictive marker in macroscopic stage III melanoma

BackgroundA substantial proportion of patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma do not benefit sufficiently from adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy, as they either recur despite therapy or would never have recurred. To...

Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (DESTINY-Lung01): primary results of the HER2-overexpressing cohorts from a single-arm, phase 2 trial

DESTINY-Lung01 is a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study evaluating the antitumour activity and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan, a HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with HER2-overexpressing or HER2 (ERBB2)-mutant unresectable or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The results of the HER2-mutant cohort (cohort 2) have been reported elsewhere. Herein, we report the primary analysis of cohorts 1 and 1A, which aimed to evaluate the activity and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg and 6·4 mg/kg in patients with HER2-overexpressing NSCLC. Patients aged 18 years or older with unresectable or metastatic (or both unresectable and metastatic) non-squamous NSCLC who had relapsed following or were refractory to standard treatment or for whom no standard treatment was available, with an HER2 immunohistochemistry score of 3+ or 2+ (without known HER2 mutations) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, were enrolled at 20 specialist hospitals in France, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, and the USA. Patients were assigned to cohorts sequentially, first to cohort 1, to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan 6·4 mg/kg (cohort 1), then to cohort 1A, to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg, both administered intravenously once every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate by independent central review and was assessed in the full analysis set, which included all patients who signed an informed consent form and were enrolled in the study. Safety was assessed in all enrolled patients who received at least one dose of trastuzumab deruxtecan. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03505710, and is ongoing (closed to recruitment). Between Aug 27, 2018, and Jan 28, 2020, 49 patients were enrolled in cohort 1 (median age 63·0 years [IQR 58·0-68·0], 30 [61%] male, 19 [39%] female, and 31 [63%] White), and from June 16 to Dec 9, 2020, 41 patients were enrolled in cohort 1A (median age 62·0 years [IQR 56·0-66·0], 22 [54%] male, 19 [46%] female, and 31 [76%] White). As of data cutoff (Dec 3, 2021), the median treatment duration was 4·1 months (IQR 1·4-7·1) in cohort 1 and 5·5 months (1·4-8·7) in cohort 1A, and median follow-up was 12·0 months (5·4-22·4) in cohort 1 and 10·6 months (4·5-13·5) in cohort 1A. Confirmed objective response rate by independent central review was 26·5% (95% CI 15·0-41·1; 13 of 49, all partial responses) in cohort 1 and 34·1% (20·1-50·6; 14 of 41; two complete responses and 12 partial responses) in cohort 1A. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutropenia (12 [24%] of 49 in cohort 1, none in cohort 1A), pneumonia (six [12%] and two [5%], respectively), fatigue (six [12%] and three [7%], respectively), and disease progression (six [12%] and four [10%], respectively). Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 26 (53%) of 41 patients in cohort 1 and nine (22%) of 49 patients in cohort 1A. Drug-related serious adverse events were reported in ten (20%) patients and three (7%) patients, respectively. Deaths due to treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in ten (20%) patients in cohort 1 (disease progression in six (12%) patients and bronchospasm, hydrocephalus, respiratory failure, and pneumonitis in one [2%] patient each), and in seven (17%) patients in cohort 1A (due to disease progression in four (10%) patients and dyspnoea, malignant neoplasm, and sepsis in one (2%) patient each). One death due to a treatment-emergent adverse event was determined to be due to study treatment by the investigator, which was in cohort 1 (pneumonitis). Independent adjudication of interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis found that drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis occurred in ten (20%) patients in cohort 1 (two [4%] grade 1, five [10%] grade 2, and three [6%] grade 5) and two (5%) patients in cohort 1A (one [2%] grade 2 and one [2%] grade 5). An additional patient in cohort 1A had grade 4 pneumonitis after the data cutoff, which was subsequently adjudicated as drug-related grade 5 interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis. Given the low antitumour activity of existing treatment options in this patient population, trastuzumab deruxtecan might have the potential to fill a large unmet need in HER2-overexpressing NSCLC. Our findings support further investigation of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-overexpressing NSCLC. Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

Abstract 1182: PDC*lung01: An innovative therapeutic cancer vaccine induces specific immune responses in combination with anti- PD-1 treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract We have developed an innovative cancer vaccine for the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients in combination with checkpoint inhibitors. This PDC*lung01 product based on an irradiated plasmacytoid dendritic cell line loaded with HLA-A*02:01 restricted peptides (NY-ESO-1, MAGE-A3, MAGE-A4, Multi-MAGE-A, MUC1, Survivin and Melan-A) is able to prime and expand peptide-specific CD8+ T cells in vitro and in vivo, and is synergistic with anti-Programmed Death (PD)-1 (Plumas et al, 2022; Hannani et al, 2023, NCT03970746). In study PDC-LUNG-101 with EudraCT number 2018-002382-19, PDC*lung01 is injected intravenously and subcutaneously for 6 times at two dose levels, 14 million, or 140 million cells in stage II/IIIA (cohort A1 &amp; A2, monotherapy) or stage IV with TPS≥50% (cohort B1 &amp; B2; in combination with pembrolizumab) patients. We report here the analysis of immune response of 3 cohorts (A1, A2, B1) of patients and the first 19 patients out of 42 (cohort B2) treated with high dose of PDC*lung01 in combination with Pembrolizumab at baseline and 3 timepoints post injection. Several circulating immune parameters have been evaluated at different times before and after vaccination using different assays we have developed: leukocyte count and determination of circulation peptide specific CD8+ T cells by flow cytometry using multimer tools without prior in vitro culture. The assay made on purified CD8+ T-cells allowed us to define a limit of quantification (LOQ) to accurately assess the fold changes of the cell expansion. In addition, tumor microenvironment (TME) was analyzed by multiplex fluorescence immunochemistry. The data of 42 patients for who an immune response has been evaluated (cohorts A and B) will be presented. No major changes in circulating main lymphocyte frequencies (B cells, NK cells, CD4+, CD8+, or Treg T cells) were observed during treatment. In addition, no major cell activation (CD25+, CD54, or DR+) was noted. In contrast, in a significant number of patients, PDC*lung01 induced circulating peptide-specific CD8+ T cell expansion in all 4 cohorts at different levels and time points against at least one out of seven peptides used. The percentages of patients for who an expansion of antigen-specific T-cell were observed were 50%, 64%, 66.7% and 68.4% in A1, A2, B1 and B2 cohorts respectively. The intensity of the immune response was proportional to the dose of PDC*lung01 and to the combination with pembrolizumab. When possible, total and peptide-specific CD8+ T cells were sorted for analysis of TCR repertoire, illustrating the modelling and dynamics of the immune response. The TME features will also be illustrated. To conclude, treatment with PDC*lung01 induces an anti-tumor immune response in a significant number of patients which appears to be enhanced by the combination with pembrolizumab. Citation Format: Joel Plumas, Anne Sibille, Ingel Demedts, Elvire Pons-Tostivint, Charlotte Van de Kerkhove, Sofie Derijcke, Willemijn Theelen, Bonne Biesma, Frank Borm, Els Wauters, Mike Collodoro, Kays Al Badawy, Camille Duchayne, Channa Debruyne, Beatrice Devos, Benoit Colinet, Denis Moro-Sibilot, Maurice Perol, Eva-Lotte Buchmeier, Marcin Skrzypski, Kristof Cuppens, Johan Vansteenkiste. PDC*lung01: An innovative therapeutic cancer vaccine induces specific immune responses in combination with anti- PD-1 treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1182.

A phase I study of ATR inhibitor gartisertib (M4344) as a single agent and in combination with carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours

BackgroundGartisertib is an oral inhibitor of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR), a key kinase of the DNA damage response. We aimed to determine the safety and tolerability of gartisertib ± carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours.MethodsThis phase I open-label, multicenter, first-in-human study comprised four gartisertib cohorts: A (dose escalation [DE]; Q2W); A2 (DE; QD/BID); B1 (DE+carboplatin); and C (biomarker-selected patients).ResultsOverall, 97 patients were enroled into cohorts A (n = 42), A2 (n = 26), B1 (n = 16) and C (n = 13). The maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) were not declared for cohorts A or B1. In cohort A2, the RP2D for gartisertib was determined as 250 mg QD. Gartisertib was generally well-tolerated; however, unexpected increased blood bilirubin in all study cohorts precluded further DE. Investigations showed that gartisertib and its metabolite M26 inhibit UGT1A1-mediated bilirubin glucuronidation in human but not dog or rat liver microsomes. Prolonged partial response (n = 1 [cohort B1]) and stable disease >6 months (n = 3) did not appear to be associated with biomarker status. Exposure generally increased dose-dependently without accumulation.ConclusionGartisertib was generally well-tolerated at lower doses; however, unexpected liver toxicity prevented further DE, potentially limiting antitumour activity. Gartisertib development was subsequently discontinued.ClinicalTrials.govNCT02278250.

Results from the phase 1b/2 SGNTUC-024 study: Assessment of tucatinib, trastuzumab, and FOLFOX for HER2+ GI cancers.

100 Background: HER2 is overexpressed in various GI tumors. Tucatinib (TUC), which is approved in combination with trastuzumab (Tras) in the US for previously treated RAS WT HER2+ metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor highly selective for HER2. Preliminary safety and antitumor activity results of TUC + trastuzumab + FOLFOX in patients (pts) with HER2+ GI cancers are presented. Methods: The phase 1b/2 SGNTUC-024 (NCT04430738) study evaluated TUC + Tras + FOLFOX in pts with HER2+ metastatic GI cancers in Cohorts 1A, 1B, 1D (pts in Japan), and 2B. For Cohorts 1A, 1B, and 1D (enrolled sequentially), eligible pts had unresectable or metastatic HER2+ GI malignancies, including mCRC. Cohort 2B is still enrolling, and pts with HER2+ mCRC are eligible. Pts received a combination of TUC 150 mg orally twice a day (PO BID; Cohort 1A) or TUC 300 mg PO BID (Cohorts 1B, 1D, and 2B) + Tras + FOLFOX. Pts in Cohort 2B were enrolled to further assess the study regimen. Antidiarrheal prophylaxis was required for Cohort 1D. Results: As of July 10, 2023, 25 pts were treated (5, 11, 7, and 2 in Cohorts 1A, 1B, 1D, and 2B, respectively). In Cohort 1A (TUC 150 mg PO BID), the most common TEAEs were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and proteinuria (each in 60.0% [3/5]). For pts receiving TUC 300 mg PO BID, the most common TEAEs were diarrhea (90.0% [18/20]) and fatigue (65.0% [13/20]). Table 1 presents the overall summary of adverse events. In Cohort 1A, Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to any treatment discontinuation were reported in 40.0% (2/5) pts, with 20.0% (1/5) discontinuing tucatinib. For pts treated with TUC 300 mg, TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation were reported in 35.0% (7/20), with 15.0% (3/20) discontinuing tucatinib. One TEAE leading to death (aspiration) in Cohort 1A was unrelated to study treatment. Grade ≥3 diarrhea was observed in 45.5% (5/11) pts in Cohort 1B; most were observed in elderly pts or pts with gastric, gastroesophageal, or esophageal cancer or pts who were generally noncompliant with antidiarrheal treatment. No grade ≥3 diarrhea was observed in Cohort 1D. Among pts receiving TUC 300 mg, confirmed objective response rate was 83.3% (5/6) for mCRC, 40.0% (4/10) for gastroesophageal cancers, and 0% (0/4) for biliary tract cancer. Conclusions: TUC + Tras + FOLFOX showed manageable safety in the enrolled pt population and preliminary antitumor activity in pts with HER2+ mCRC and gastroesophageal cancer. This regimen will be compared with the standard of care (FOLFOX with or without bevacizumab/cetuximab) in the ongoing randomized, phase 3 study (MOUNTAINEER-03; NCT05253651) for pts with HER2+ RAS WT mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT04430738 . [Table: see text]

Efficacy and safety results of FGFR1-3 inhibitor, tinengotinib, as monotherapy in patients with advanced, metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: Results from phase II clinical trial.

434 Background: Tinengotinib is a spectrum-selective multi-kinase inhibitor with unique binding properties to FGFR, potently inhibited FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement and acquired resistant mutations in pre-clinical models and in phase I trials that included cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients (pts). Here we present the efficacy and safety of tinengotinib in a phase II clinical trial. Methods: Eligible pts with advanced/metastatic CCA who had received ≥ 1 prior systemic chemotherapy therapy and ECOG PS 0 or 1 were treated with tinengotinib 10 mg QD. Four cohorts included: Cohort A1: FGFR2 fusion(s) with primary progression on previous FGFR inhibitor ( FGFRi), A2: FGFR2 fusion(s) with progression after prior response to FGFRi (acquired resistance); B: non-fusion FGFR alteration(s): C: FGFR wild-type ( FGFRwt). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. CTCAE V5.0 was used for safety assessments. Results: As of 7Aug2023, 48 pts with CCA were enrolled, 13 in Cohort A1, 10 in A2, 12 in B, 13 in C. Median age 61.5 [range 25-81] years old, 41.7% male, 58.3% had ≥ 3 lines of prior therapy. ECOG PS 0 in 47.9% pts. Among 35 pts with FGFR alterations, 80.0% had ≥ 1 prior FGFRi therapy, and 97.1% had prior chemotherapy. Forty (40) pts were efficacy evaluable. In A1, 1 out of 11 pts (9.1%) achieved PR with tumor reduction of 31.8%. In A2, 3 out of 8 pts (37.5%) achieved PR with tumor reduction of 40.7%, 47.0% and 54.6%. In B, 3 out of 9 pts (33.3%) achieved PR with tumor reduction of 36.5%, 48.6%, and 60.6%. No PR was observed in C. Overall DCR was 94.7% (18/19) in FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement pts (A1+A2), 88.9% (8/9) in other FGFR alterations pts (B), and 75% (9/12) in FGFRwt pts (C). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.26 months (95%CI, 2.86-9.10) in A1+A2, 5.98 months (95%CI, 1.87-NA) in B and 3.84 months (95% CI, 1.84-4.80) in C. Among 48 treated pts, treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 45 (93.8%) pts, 14 (29.2%) in G1-2, 29 (60.4%) in G3 and 2 (4.2%) in G4. The most common G3 TRAEs were hypertension in 12 (25%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome in 3 (6.3%), diarrhea in 3 (6.3%) and stomatitis in 3 (6.3%). One subject had G4 increased TSH and G4 increased lipase, and another subject had G4 posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. No G5 TRAE was observed. Conclusions: Tinengotinib has promising clinical benefit for FGFR2 fusion CCA after prior FGFRi and for non-fusion FGFR alterations. Tinengotinib-related toxicities were manageable. An ongoing randomized, controlled phase III study will evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and pharmacodynamic effect of Tinengotinib vs Physicians’ choice in subjects with FGFR2-altered refractory/relapsed CCA after prior chemotherapy and FGFRi therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04919642 .

ARC-8: Phase 1/1b randomized study of quemliclustat + gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel ± zimberelimab in patients with treatment-naive metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

665 Background: Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) remains a challenging cancer to treat, with median survival of &lt;1 year. In PDAC, extracellular adenosine (eADO) produced from ATP is released from tumor cells and suppresses antitumor immune responses. Quemliclustat (Q) is a potent and selective small-molecule inhibitor of soluble and cell-bound CD73, a key enzyme involved in the production of eADO within the tumor microenvironment. Elevated CD73 expression is found in 40-60% of PDAC and correlates with poor clinical outcome. ARC-8 evaluated Q ± anti-PD-1 antibody zimberelimab (Z) in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (G/nP). Methods: ARC-8 (NCT04104672) is a phase 1b dose escalation and expansion study in patients (pts) with treatment-naive mPDAC. Q 100mg was previously determined as the recommended dose for expansion (Manji et al., 2021). Q 100 mg is administered with standard doses of G/nP with Z (240 mg IV Q2W) in the dose expansion (Cohort A; QZ+G/nP) and in randomized (2:1) cohorts either with Z (Cohort A1; QZ+G/nP) or without Z (Cohort A2; Q+G/nP). Adverse events (AEs) are recorded and graded per NCI CTCAE 5.0. Clinical activity is assessed every 8 weeks per RECIST v1.1. Endpoints include measures of safety and median overall survival (OS). Results: As of June 19, 2023, 122 patients with untreated mPDAC were treated with Q 100mg, including 93 pts treated with QZ+G/nP (dose escalation, n=6; cohort A, n=26; and randomized cohort A1, n=61) and 29 pts treated with Q+G/nP (Cohort A2). Median age was 66 years, 66% ECOG of 1, and 65% had liver metastasis at baseline. Median survival follow-up was 21 months (mos). Efficacy is summarized in Table 1. All patients reported AE, 85% Grade 3+ AE, and 23% discontinued study treatment due to AE. Most common Grade 3+ AE was neutrophil count decreased (31%) and anemia (25%). Conclusions: Results from ARC-8 demonstrate the addition of Q 100 mg ± Z to G/nP was safe and tolerable, with no significant added toxicity to GnP. Modulation of eADO with Q may confer benefit beyond radiographic measures of disease. The OS is promising and supports further development of Q in mPDAC. Clinical trial information: NCT04104672 . [Table: see text]

Reduced Dose Brentuximab Vedotin for Mycosis Fungoides Appears to Prolong Response Duration By Balancing Efficacy and Tolerability

Introduction: Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is one of the most active systemic agents for treating mycosis fungoides (MF); however, treatment duration and the duration of response is frequently limited by the development of peripheral neuropathy (PN). In the phase III ALCANZA study of BV, 44/66 (67%) of patients (pts) treated with BV developed PN, including grade 2 (G2) in 32% and grade 3 (G3) in 10%. The overall response rate (ORR) to BV was 65% and median duration of response (DOR) was 15.1 months (mo) (Prince et al, Lancet 2017). We hypothesized that reduced-dose BV would improve tolerability without compromising efficacy and therefore facilitate a longer duration of response for pts with MF. Methods: This is a multicenter phase II study evaluating reduced-dose BV in pts with relapsed or refractory MF who are BV-naive. Cohort 1A evaluated BV at 0.9 mg/kg every 3 weeks and cohort 1B evaluated BV at 1.2 mg/kg every 3 weeks. For each dose level, we utilized a Simon two-stage minimax design in which we set the desired ORR at 65% (as reported in ALCANZA) and the null hypothesis at 35%. Accordingly, stage I required 4 responses among the first 9 pts enrolled to expand to a total of 19 pts. In stage II, 11 responses were required to declare the dose promising. Global response was evaluated every 4 cycles using the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas consensus criteria (Olsen et al, JCO 2011). PN was evaluated according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 4.0.3 and Total Neuropathy Score (TNSc). Additional outcomes include Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measured by the FACT-Lym, FACT-GOG_NTX and Skindex-29 questionnaires completed by pts every four cycles. Results: Among 19 pts enrolled on cohort 1A, median age was 60 years (yrs) (range, 38-85) and 16/19 (84%) were male. Majority had stage I/II disease (n = 16, 84%) and 42% of pts had large cell transformation. Median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 0-9) (Table 1). 8/19 pts (42%) experienced PN, including 3/19 (16%) G2 and 0/19 ≥ G3. ORR was 42% (8/19) (8 PR, 0 CR). Median DOR was 19.6 mo (95% CI, 5.9 - NR) (Figure 1). The primary efficacy endpoint for cohort 1A was not met, leading to enrollment onto cohort 1B. To date, 14 of planned 19 pts enrolled onto cohort 1B. Majority had MF (86%), median age was 62 yrs (range 39-83) and 10/14 (71%) were male. 11/14 (79%) were early stage and 4/14 (29%) had large cell transformation. Median number of prior therapies was 1.5 (range 0-4). 10/14 (71%) pts experienced PN, including 4/10 (40%) G2 and 0/10 ≥ G3. The ORR is 50% (7 PR, 0 CR) and the median DOR has not been reached (95% CI, 5.4 - NR). Across the 2 cohorts, additional BV-related adverse events seen in &amp;gt;10% of pts included infusion-related reactions (G1, n = 3; G2, n = 1), hepatic transaminase elevation (G1, n = 4; G2, n = 1), diarrhea (G1, n = 4; G3, n =1), nausea (G1, n = 4; G2, n =1), fatigue (G1, n = 5; G2, n = 2), and maculopapular rash (G1, n = 4; G2, n = 3; G3, n =2). Conclusion: Treatment of MF with reduced-dose BV of 0.9 mg/kg was associated with lower clinical activity (ORR 42%) than full-dose BV (1.8 mg/kg, ORR 65%). However, while recognizing the limitations of cross-trial comparisons, there were numerically lower rates of PN and a longer median DOR than with full dose BV on the ALCANZA trial. Although unable to reject the null hypothesis for cohort 1A, 0.9 mg/kg dosing allowed for prolonged disease control and diminished toxicity for responding pts. As MF is a chronic, typically incurable condition, prolonged duration of treatment is particularly important. Enrollment onto cohort 1B (1.2 mg/kg) is ongoing; we will present updated results along with pt reported outcomes at the conference.

Phase 1/2 Multicenter, Open-Label Study of CTX-712 in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Background and Significance Dysregulation of alternative splicing, caused by abnormal expression or mutation of splicing factors, has been identified as an important contributor to the genesis and progression of cancer, and suggested as a novel target for anticancer treatment. CDC2-like kinases (CLK) represent a family of dual-specificity tyrosine and serine-threonine kinases that are involved in the regulation of splicing by phosphorylation of serine/arginine-rich splicing factors (SRSFs) which play a central role in exon recognition. CTX-712 is an orally available, potent, selective, and a first-in-class pan-CLK inhibitor (CLK 1-4), that inhibits phosphorylation of SRSFs resulting in significant antitumor activity in vitro and multiple xenograft models in vivo. CTX-712 formulated in capsules is currently being evaluated in an ongoing first-in-man study in Japan, evaluating tolerability and early efficacy in patients with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies (JapicCTI-184188). Preliminary data from the Japanese study were presented during ASCO 2022 and ASH 2022, and showed an acceptable safety profile (doses up to 175 mg (MTD 140 mg) twice a week in 28-day cycles, observed DLTs included dehydration, decreased platelets, hypokalemia, and pneumonia) with early signs of clinical antitumor activity (2 partial responses / 26 treated solid tumor patients, 5 complete remissions and complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery/ 8 treated patients with AML or MDS), warranting further clinical investigations.. (J Clin Oncol (2022) 40(16_suppl):3080. Blood (2022) 140(Supplement 1):6211-2.). This abstract details a second study with CTX-712 that has just been initiated. Study Design and Methods A new film-coated tablet formulation will be evaluated in this phase 1/2 multicenter, open-label study of CTX-712 in patients with (mutated or wild type spliceosomes genes) relapsed/refractory AML, higher risk MDS (IPSS-R intermediate, high, or very high), or high marrow blast (≥5 %) MDS/MPN (including CMML). The phase 1 part of the study will be conducted at 4 US sites, and all sites are currently open for enrolment. The study allows patients with performance status 0, 1, or 2, adequate organ function, and up to four prior lines of therapy. Due to potential risk of interactions (in vitro studies suggest CYP3A4 as main metabolic pathway for CTX-712), concomitant use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors is prohibited. Use of azole antifungals that are not strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., isavuconazole) is permitted. The phase 1 part of the study consists of dose-escalation (sequential standard 3 + 3 design), where cohorts of 3 (or 6) patients will receive ascending doses of CTX-712 once weekly in a 28-day cycle with continuous monitoring of emerging clinical PK, PD, safety, and efficacy data, to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) based on the suggestion by the Safety Review Committee (SRC). The protocol defines five different dose levels (20-140 mg, once weekly) but also authorizes the SRC to suggest up to two interim dose levels or alternate schedules (e.g., dosing two times a week) if supported by emerging data. The suggested RP2D will be used in a confirmatory phase 1 expansion cohort where an additional 10 patients (total n = 16; 8 patients with AML and 8 patients with MDS) will be treated to gain further confidence in the selected dose level. The phase 2 part of the study will commence after the RP2D has been identified and confirmed and aims at evaluating therapeutic activity in R/R AML (Cohort 2a) or R/R HR-MDS (Cohort 2b), in addition to confirmation of the safety profile. Clinical trial registry number: NCT05732103

Tailor: Interventional Study Evaluating Physician's Choice of Ibrutinib Monotherapy or Ibrutinib-Venetoclax Combination Using Dose Modifications and Alternate Dosing Approaches in Patients with Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Background: Ibrutinib is a first-in-class Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) that has changed the treatment paradigm for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with durable responses and improved overall survival (OS). In the pivotal Phase 3 GLOW and Phase 2 CAPTIVATE trials, fixed-duration combination of ibrutinib-venetoclax (I+V) resulted in deep and sustained clinical responses, and a broadly manageable safety profile in patients with CLL. Several factors including genetic features, disease status, comorbidities, patient preferences, and safety profiles contribute to selection of the optimal therapeutic option for patients with CLL in the first-line setting. Adverse events (AEs), such as atrial fibrillation, bleeding, and hypertension, have been seen with the BTKi therapeutic class.Long-term clinical and real-world experience with ibrutinib has led to specific guidance regarding AE management, which has been included in the updated ibrutinib prescribing information (US PI, May 2022; EU SmPC, April 2023). Retrospective evidence, including post-hoc analyses of clinical trial data, demonstrates that dose reduction of ibrutinib mitigates recurrence or worsening of AEs while preserving efficacy. Thus, these findings together support the rationale to prospectively evaluate the impact of regimen and dosing flexibility of ibrutinib in patients with untreated CLL. Aim: The key objective of the TAILOR study (NCT05963074) is to assess the efficacy and safety of I+V and ibrutinib monotherapy regimens with both a proactive and reactive dose adjustment in patients with untreated CLL. Methods: TAILOR is a phase 2, two-arm, four-cohort interventional study designed to provide physicians the choice of ibrutinib monotherapy or I+V combination therapy for previously untreated patients with CLL and prospectively evaluate proactive and reactive dose adjustment approaches. Eligible patients will have previously untreated active CLL, needing therapy as per iwCLL 2018 criteria. Key exclusion criteria include significant active or history of cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled hypertension, and ECOG performance status &amp;gt; 2. Patients will be randomized after selection of regimen: I+V fixed-duration regimen (2 cohorts, 80 patients in each cohort) or ibrutinib monotherapy (2 cohorts, 80 patients in each cohort), as per physician's choice. Patients in the I+V arm will receive ibrutinib 420 mg QD as lead-in for 3 cycles plus 12 cycles of either ibrutinib 420 mg QD (Cohort 1a) or 280 mg QD (Cohort 1b) in combination with venetoclax, which will be initiated in cycle 4 with dose ramp-up per label over 5 weeks (20, 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg/day) and continued at 400 mg/day dose from cycle 5 onward. In addition, patients with deletion 17p and/or mutated TP53 will receive optional ibrutinib maintenance. Patients in the ibrutinib monotherapy arm will receive ibrutinib 420 mg QD (Cohort 2a) or 420 mg QD for 3 cycles, then 280 mg QD (Cohort 2b) until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity ( Figure). All cohorts will follow the dose modification guidance as per protocol based on the US PI/ EU SmPC. The primary endpoint is best overall response rate as assessed by investigators and compared with historic controls. Secondary endpoints include: complete response rate, duration of response, PFS, and OS; undetectable minimal residual disease rate (I+V cohorts only); safety (AEs, discontinuation due to AEs, adherence rates); and patient reported outcomes. The study is currently recruiting patients.