Cognitive Fusion Biopsy Research Articles

Performance of cognitive vs. image-guided fusion biopsy for detection of overall and clinically significant prostate cancer in a multiethnic population

PurposeTransrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy remains the most used method for the detection of prostate cancer. We recently reported that detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (cs-CaP) using image-guided fusion biopsies (IGFB) varied by race/ethnicity, which calls for further comparison between cognitive fusion biopsy (CFB) and IGFB among non-Hispanic black and Hispanic populations. Therefore, the aim of our study is to compare the rates of detection of cs-CaP and overall CaP by CFB and IGFB in a multiethnic community. Material and methodsWe performed a retrospective, cross-sectional review of men who underwent MRI-transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy at our diverse, urban academic medical center. Agreement and discordance between fusion biopsies and systematic biopsies for detection of cs-CaP and overall CaP were determined using Kappa statistics. Univariate and multivariate mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to find associations between fusion modalities and prostate cancer detection. ResultsIn total, 710 men underwent fusion prostate biopsies between December 2015 and June 2021. Upon univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, there was no significant association between IGFB vs. CFB and risk of overall CaP (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.36–1.21, P = 0.18) or cs-CaP (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.30–1.08, P = 0.09). We found moderate agreement between fusion and systematic biopsies for both CFB (κ = 0.56) and IGFB (κ = 0.52) in cs-CaP. ConclusionsCFB and IGFB offer similar detection rates of cs-CaP in a multiethnic population. CFB represents an effective and accessible means of accurately diagnosing prostate cancer.

Transperineal US-MRI Fusion-Guided Biopsy for the Detection of Clinical Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cognitive and Software-Assisted Technique

Introduction: We aimed to find potential differences in clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates between transperineal software-assisted fusion biopsy (saFB) and cognitive fusion biopsies (cFB). Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify comparative studies using PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus according to the PICOS criteria. Cancer detection and complication rates were pooled using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel method with the random effect model and reported as odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p-values. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 software by Cochrane Collaboration. The quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, using RoB 2 for randomized studies and ROBINS-I for retrospective and nonrandomized ones. Results: Eight studies were included for the meta-analysis, including 1149 cases in software-based and 963 cases in cognitive fusion biopsy. The detection rates of csPCa were similar between the two groups (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.74–1.37, p = 0.95). Study heterogeneity was low (I2 55%). Conclusion: There is no actual evidence of the superiority of saFB over cFB in terms of the csPCa detection rate. Operator experience and software availability can drive the choice of one fusion technique over the other.

Comparison of MR-TRUS Fusion Biopsy and Cognitive Fusion Biopsy Techniques in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer with Mp-MRI

Bu çalışmada, Multiparametrik Manyetik Rezonans (mp-MR) tetkikinde PIRADS 3 (Prostat Görüntüleme Raporlama ve Bilgi Sistemi) ve üzeri lezyonu bulunan hastalarda MR- Transrektal Ultrasonografi (MR-TRUS) eşliğinde füzyon biyopsi ve kognitif Füzyon (KF) biyopsi tekniklerinin prostat kanseri saptamadaki etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Kliniğimizde 2017-2022 yılları arasında biyopsi öncesi yapılmış mp-MR tetkiklerinde PIRADS 3 ve üzeri lezyonu bulunan, PSA değeri 2-20 ng/ml arasında olan, daha önce hiç prostat biyopsisi yapılmamış ve mp-MR tetkiki sonrası ilk 6 ay içerisinde 48 MR-TRUS, 48 KF füzyon biyopsisi yapılmış 96 hasta seçildi. Hasta yaşı, PSA değeri, prostat volümü, lezyonların boyutu ve PIRADS skoru gibi parametreler değerlendirildi. Gruplar arasında demografik verilerde, PSA değerleri, prostat volümleri ve lezyonların boyut ve PIRADS skorlarında anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı (p>0.05). Kognitif füzyon yapılan grupta herhangi bir lokalizasyonda kanser yakalama oranı %41,7 (20/48 hasta), MR-TRUS füzyon biyopsi yapılan grupta %39,6 (19/48 hasta) bulundu. İki grup arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı (p=0,835). Hedefli biyopsi sonuçlarında ise kanser saptama oranları KF grubunda %85 (17/20 hasta), MR-TRUS grubunda %73,7 (14/19 hasta) bulundu. Bu iki grup arasında da anlamlı farklılık izlenmedi (p=0,518). Sonuç olarak, kanser yakalama başarısının benzer olması, uygulamasının daha kolay ve maliyetinin daha düşük olması nedeniyle KF biyopsi tekniği MR-füzyon biyopsisine tercih edilebilir.

Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Targeted by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Fusion

Prostate cancer is among the most frequently diagnosed cancers and a leading cause of cancer-related death in men. Currently, the most reliable and widely used imaging test for prostate cancer diagnosis is multiparametric pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Modern biopsy techniques are based on the computerised merging of ultrasound and MRI images to provide better vision during the biopsy procedure (Fusion Biopsy). However, the method is expensive due to high equipment cost. Cognitive fusion of ultrasound and MRI images has recently emerged as a cheaper and easier alternative to computerised fusion. The aim of this prospective study is to perform an in-patient comparison of the systematic prostate biopsy procedure (SB) vs. cognitive fusion (CF) guided prostate biopsy method in terms of safety, ease of use, cancer detection rate and clinically significant cancer detection. We enrolled 103 patients with suspected prostate cancer that were biopsy naive, with PSA > 4 ng/dL and PIRADS score of 3, 4 or 5. All patients received a transperineal standard 12-18 cores systematic biopsy (SB) and a four-cores targeted cognitive fusion (CF) biopsy. Following the prostate biopsy, 68% of the patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer (70/103 patients). SB diagnosis rate was 62% while CF biopsy was slightly better with a 66% rate. There was a significant 20% increase in clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate for the CF compared to SB (p < 0.05) and a significant prostate cancer risk upgrade from the low to the intermediate risk category (13%, p = 0.041). Transperineal cognitive fusion targeted prostate biopsy is a straightforward biopsy method that is easy to perform and is a safe alternative to standard systematic biopsy with improved significant cancer detection accuracy. A combined targeted and systematic approach should be used for the best diagnostic results.

Impact of changing PI-RADS cutoff on prostate cancer detection by MRI cognitive fusion biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients

BackgroundMulti-parametric magnetic resonance imaging may improve the detection of prostate cancer. The aim of this work is to compare between PI-RADS 3–5 and PI-RADS 4–5 as a threshold for targeted prostatic biopsy.MethodsThis is a prospective clinical study that included 40 biopsy-naïve patients referred for prostate biopsy. Patients underwent prebiopsy multi-parametric (mp-MRI), followed by 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy and cognitive MRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy from each detected lesion. The primary endpoint was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the PI-RAD 3–4 versus PI-RADS 4–5 lesion by mpMRI for prostate cancer detection in biopsy-naive men.ResultsThe overall prostate cancer detection rate and the clinically significant cancer detection rate were 42.5% and 35%, respectively. Targeted biopsies from PI-RADS 3–5 lesions showed a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 44%, positive predictive value of 51.7%, and negative predictive value of 100%. Restricting targeted biopsies to PI-RADS 4–5 lesions resulted in a decrease in sensitivity and negative predictive value to 73.3% and 86.2%, respectively, while specificity and positive predictive value were increased to 100% for both parameters which was statistically significant (P value < 0.0001 and P value = 0.004, respectively).ConclusionsLimiting the TBs to PI-RADS 4–5 lesions improves the performance of mp-MRI in the detection of prostate cancer especially aggressive tumors.

IS UPGRADE IN GLEASON SCORE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY PREDICTABLE WITH PREOPERATIVE MULTIPARAMETRIC PROSTATE MRI?: COMPARISON OF ADC, K-TRANS, TUMOR SIZE AND PI-RADS SCORE

Aim: In this study, the relationship between MRI parameters and upgrade in Gleason score after radical prostatectomy was investigated. Materials and Methods: Between November 2017 and July 2020, 112 patients who underwent multiparametric MRI with suspected prostate cancer, TRUS systematic and cognitive fusion biopsy and subsequent radical prostatectomy were involved this study. The patients were evaluated in two groups as those with and without the Gleason score upgrade after surgery. These two groups was compared in terms of ADC, k-trans, tumor size and PI-RADS score. Radiological evaluation was consensus using PI-RADS version 2.1 by two radiologists who lacked clinical knowledge. ADC and k-trans were measured in the MR workstation. ISUP scoring system was used in pathological evaluation. Results: Upgrade in Gleason score was found in 51/112 of the cases. Only 2/51 cases were PI-RADS score 1. Upgrade rate of Gleason score were 15,6% for PI-RADS score &amp;lt;4; and 84,3% for score ≥4. The most frequent upgrade was from ISUP 1 to ISUP 2. There was no significant difference in PSA, PSAd tumor size, k-trans and ADC in comparing between two groups. Upgrade was significantly higher in cases with PI-RADS score ≥4 and the transitional zone involvement on MRI (p&amp;lt;0.05). Conclusion: mpMRI is an effective method of predicting upgrade in Gleason score after radical prostatectomy. PI-RADS score ≥4 or transitional zone involvement has an independent predictive value.

Does Experience Affect the Cancer Detection Rate in Cognitive Fusion Prostate Biopsy? A Comparison of the First and Last 60 Cases

Objective: We aimed to determine the contribution of the clinical experience gained in cognitive fusion prostate biopsy with the increase in the number of cases to the cancer detection rate. Materials and Methods: The records of 120 patients who underwent cognitive fusion biopsy were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent 3-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (Mp-MRI) and they were evaluated with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS). The initial 60 cases were included in group 1, and the later subsequent 60 cases performed by the same surgeon were included in group 2. Any cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPrCa) detection rates in groups 1 and 2 were compared. Results: The mean ages of the patients for group 1 and group 2 were determined as 64.08 ± 8.15 and 65.15 ± 6.93 years, respectively. Age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volumes and the number of suspicious lesions of the groups were similar. Any cancer positivity rate was 33.3% for group 1, and 40% for group 2, without any significant intergroup difference (p=0.494). CSPrCa positivity was 40% and 70.83% for groups 1 and 2, respectively, and there was a significant improvement in CSPrCa detection in favor of group 2 (p=0.027). Conclusion: Regarding the cognitive fusion biopsies, a learning curve is required. It was concluded that the rate of detecting clinically significant prostate cancer was almost doubled with the increased experience in fusion biopsy. Keywords: Biopsy, Cognitive Fusion, Learning Curve, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Prostate Cancer

Selecting patients for magnetic resonance imaging cognitive versus ultrasound fusion biopsy of the prostate: A within-patient comparison.

ObjectivesTo compare overall agreement between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy (FB) and MRI cognitive fusion biopsy (CB) of the prostate and determine which factors affect agreement for prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent both modalities in a prospective within‐patient protocol.Patients and MethodsFrom August 2017 to January 2021, patients with at least one Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI‐RADS) 3 or higher lesion on multiparametric MRI underwent transrectal FB and CB in a prospective within‐patient protocol. CB was performed for each region of interest (ROI), followed by FB, followed by standard 12 core biopsy. Patients who were not on active surveillance were analysed. The primary endpoint was agreement for any PCa detection. McNemar's test and kappa statistic were used to analyse agreement. Chi‐square test, Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to analyse disagreement across clinical and MRI spatial variables. A multivariable generalized mixed‐effect model was used to compare the interaction between select variables and fusion modality. Statistics were performed using SAS and R.ResultsNinety patients and 98 lesions were included in the analysis. There was moderate agreement between FB and CB (k = 0.715). McNemar's test was insignificant (p = 0.285). Anterior location was the only variable associated with a significant variation in agreement, which was 70% for anterior lesions versus 89.7% for non‐anterior lesions (p = 0.035). Discordance did not vary significantly across other variables. In a mixed‐effect model, the interaction between anterior location and use of FB was insignificant (p = 0.411).ConclusionIn a within‐patient protocol of patients not on active surveillance, FB and CB performed similarly for PCa detection and with moderate agreement. Anterior location was associated with significantly higher disagreement, whereas other patient and lesion characteristics were not. Additional studies are needed to determine optimal biopsy technique for sampling anterior ROI.

Is Cognitive MR Fusion Biopsy Superior to Standard TRUS Guided Prostate Biopsy? Our Clinical Experience

Is Cognitive MR Fusion Biopsy Superior to Standard TRUS Guided Prostate Biopsy? Our Clinical Experience

A comparative study of transperineal software-assisted magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion biopsy and transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy of the prostate

BackgroundThe advantages and disadvantages of transperineal and transrectal biopsies remain controversial in the era of prostate targeted biopsy. In this study, we compared the cancer detection and complication rates of transperineal magnetic resonance/ultrasound (MR/US) fusion biopsy and transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy of the prostate.MethodsThis was a comparative study of two prospectively collected cohorts. Men with clinically suspected prostate cancer and prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score ≥ 3 lesions on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) were enrolled. They underwent either transperineal software fusion biopsy or transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy and systematic biopsy. The detection rates of any prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC, defined as Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4) and the complication rates between both groups were analysed.ResultsNinety-two and 85 patients underwent transperineal software fusion and transrectal cognitive fusion biopsies, respectively. The detection rate for any prostate cancer was similar between both groups (60.8% vs. 56.4%, p = 0.659). In terms of csPC detection, transperineal fusion biopsy outperformed transrectal fusion biopsy (52.2% vs. 36.5%, p = 0.036). In multivariate regression analysis, age, PI-RADS score > 3, and transperineal route were significant predictors of csPC. Meanwhile, transperineal biopsy resulted in a higher rate of urinary retention than transrectal biopsy (18.5% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.009). No serious infectious complications were noted, although a patient developed sepsis after transrectal biopsy.ConclusionsTransperineal software fusion biopsy provided a higher csPC detection rate than transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy and carried minimal risk for infectious complications in patients with MRI-visible prostate lesions.

TRUS-Guided Target Biopsy for a PI-RADS 3-5 Index Lesion to Reduce Gleason Score Underestimation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BackgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided cognitive or image fusion biopsy is performed to target a prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) 3–5 lesion. Biopsy Gleason score (GS) is frequently underestimated compared to prostatectomy GS. However, it is still unclear about how many cores on target are necessary to reduce undergrading and if additional cores around the target may improve grade prediction on surgical specimen.PurposeTo determine the number of target cores and targeting strategy to reduce GS underestimation.Materials and MethodsBetween May 2017 and April 2020, a total of 385 patients undergoing target cognitive or image fusion biopsy of PI-RADS 3–5 index lesions and radical prostatectomies (RP) were 2:1 matched with propensity score using multiple variables and divided into the 1–4 core (n = 242) and 5–6 core (n = 143) groups, which were obtained with multiple logistic regression with restricted cubic spline curve. Target cores of 1–3 and 4–6 were sampled from central and peripheral areas, respectively. Pathologic outcomes and target cores were retrospectively assessed to analyze the GS difference or changes between biopsy and RP with Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsThe median of target cores was 3 and 6 in the 1–4 core and 5–6 core groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Restricted cubic spline curve showed that GS upgrade was significantly reduced from the 5th core and there was no difference between 5th and 6th cores. Among the matched patients, 35.4% (136/385; 95% confidence interval, 0.305–0.403) had a GS upgrade after RP. The GS upgrades in the 1–4 core and 5–6 core groups were observed in 40.6% (98/242, 0.343–0.470) and 26.6% (38/143, 0.195–0.346), respectively (p = 0.023). Although there was no statistical difference between the matched groups in terms of RP GS (p = 0.092), the 5–6 core group had significantly higher biopsy GS (p = 0.006) and lower GS change from biopsy to RP (p = 0.027).ConclusionFive or more target cores sampling from both periphery and center of an index tumor contribute to reduce GS upgrade.

Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analyses, Clinical Parameters, and Preoperative Nomograms in the Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension.

Introduction: Proper planning of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) is crucial to achieving good oncological results with the possibility of preserving potency and continence. Aim: The aim of this study was to identify the radiological and clinical parameters that can predict the risk of extraprostatic extension (EPE) for a specific site of the prostate. Predictive models and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) data from patients qualified for RP were compared. Material and methods: The study included 61 patients who underwent laparoscopic RP. mpMRI preceded transrectal systematic and cognitive fusion biopsy. Martini, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), and Partin Tables nomograms were used to assess the risk of EPE. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for the models and compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the combination of variables that best predicted EPE risk based on final histopathology. Results: The combination of mpMRI indicating or suspecting EPE (odds ratio (OR) = 7.49 (2.31–24.27), p < 0.001) and PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL (OR = 12.06 (1.1–132.15), p = 0.04) best predicted the risk of EPE for a specific side of the prostate. For the prediction of ipsilateral EPE risk, the AUC for Martini’s nomogram vs. mpMRI was 0.73 (p < 0.001) vs. 0.63 (p = 0.005), respectively (p = 0.131). The assessment of a non-specific site of EPE by MSKCC vs. Partin Tables showed AUC values of 0.71 (p = 0.007) vs. 0.63 (p = 0.074), respectively (p = 0.211). Conclusions: The combined use of mpMRI, the results of the systematic and targeted biopsy, and prostate-specific antigen baseline can effectively predict ipsilateral EPE (pT3 stage).

Comparative Effectiveness of Techniques in Targeted Prostate Biopsy.

Simple SummaryProstate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men. Traditionally, prostate cancer is diagnosed via transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, using a systematic random template. Using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, lesions suspicious for prostate cancer can be identified, and subsequently targeted on biopsy, allowing for increased diagnostic accuracy. This article reviewed the current literature surrounding various types of targeted biopsy, such as transperineal biopsy, allowing for comparison not only between targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy, but also between different varieties of targeted biopsy.In this review, we evaluated literature regarding different modalities for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and mpMRI-targeted biopsy (TB) for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa). We identified studies evaluating systematic biopsy (SB) and TB in the same patient, thereby allowing each patient to serve as their own control. Although the evidence supports the accuracy of TB, there is still a proportion of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) that is detected only in SB, indicating the importance of maintaining SB in the diagnostic pathway, albeit with additional cost and morbidity. There is a growing subset of data which supports the role of TB alone, which may allow for increased efficiency and decreased complications. We also compared the literature on transrectal (TR) vs. transperineal (TP) TB. Although further high-level evidence is necessary, current evidence supports similar csPCa detection rate for both approaches. We also evaluated various TB techniques such as cognitive fusion biopsy (COG-TB) and in-bore biopsy (IB-TB). COG-TB has comparable detection rates to software fusion, but is operator-dependent and may have reduced accuracy for smaller lesions. IB-TB may allow for greater precision as lesions are directly targeted; however, this is costly and time-consuming, and does not account for MRI-invisible lesions.

Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/cognitive fusion biopsy: Comparing standard and targeted prostate biopsy with final prostatectomy histology

Introduction: The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with targeted biopsies of the prostate improves the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Recent studies have shown that targeted prostate biopsies also more accurately predict final histopathology after radical prostatectomy (RP). There are three broad techniques for performing MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: cognitive MRI/ultrasound (US) fusion, software MRI/US fusion, and in-bore MRI-guided. Current practices recommend that a standard systematic 12-core prostate biopsy be performed, as well as targeted biopsies in patients with positive MRI findings. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of histological grading of cognitive MRI/US fusion prostate biopsy by comparing the histology from the targeted biopsy specimens (TB), standard systematic specimens (SB), and the combination of both (CB) specimens with the final histological grade from subsequent prostatectomy.&#x0D; Methods: A retrospective, single-center review of 115 patients who underwent standard systematic and cognitive MRI/US-targeted biopsy of the prostate before undergoing a RP between 2016 and 2019 was performed. MRI findings, biopsy, final histology International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grades, and patient demographics were collected. Cochran’s Q test and McNemar test were used to compare the differences in upgrading, downgrading, and concordance between each biopsy group.&#x0D; Results: The concordance between SB, TB, and CB biopsy were 28.7%, 49.6%, and 50.4%, respectively. There was no significant difference in concordance between TB and CB. Patients were more likely to be downgraded on the final histology when comparing CB with TB alone (26.1% vs. 16.5%, p&lt;0.05). In cases where an ISUP grade 1 cancer was diagnosed on TB (n=24), there was a 62.5% chance that the final histology would be upgraded. In the same sample, when combined with a SB, the risk of upgrading on final histology reduced to 37.5%.&#x0D; Conclusions: Although grading concordance between TB and CB were similar, the concomitant use of a SB significantly reduced the rate of upgrading in the final RP histopathology. CB may result in better decision-making regarding treatment options and also have implications for intraoperative planning.

Diagnostic pathway of the biopsy-naïve patient suspected for prostate cancer: Real-life scenario when multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging is not centralized

We aimed to compare the pathway including multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) versus the one without mpMRI in detection of prostate cancer (PCa) when mpMRI is not centralized. January 2019-March 2020: prospective data collection of trans-perineal prostate biopsies. Group A: biopsy-naïve patients who underwent mpMRI (at any institution) versus Group B: patients who did not. Within Group A, patients were stratified into those with negative mpMRI (mpMRI-, PIRADS v2.1=1-3, with PSA density <0.15 if PIRADS 3) who underwent standard biopsy (SB), versus those with positive mpMRI (mpMRI+, when PIRADS 3-5, with PSA density>0.15 if PIRADS 3) who underwent cognitive fusion biopsy. Two hundred and eighty one biopsies were analyzed. 153 patients underwent mpMRI (Group A). 98 mpMRI+ underwent fusion biopsy; 55 mpMRI- underwent SB. 128 Group B patients underwent SB. Overall PCa detection rate was 52.3% vs. 48.4% (Group A vs. B, P=0.5). Non-clinically-significant PCa was detected in 7.8 vs. 13.3% (Group A vs. B, P=0.1). Among the 98 mpMRI+ Group A patients only 2 had non clinically-significant disease. In 55 mpMRI- patients who underwent SB, 10 (18.2%) had clinically-significant PCa. Prostate volume predicted detection of PCa. In Group B, age and PSA predicted PCa. Sensitivity of mpMRI was 75.0% for all PCa, 85.3% for clinically-significant PCa. Higher detection of PCa and lower detection of non-clinically-significant PCa favored mpMRI pathway. A consistent number of clinically-significant PCa was diagnosed after a mpMRI-. Thus, in real-life scenario, mpMRI- does not obviate indication to biopsy when mpMRI is not centralized. 3.

Diagnostic accuracy of Multiparametric MRI in detection of prostate cancer compared with histopathology obtained by MRI directed TRUS guided cognitive fusion biopsy are T2WI, DWI and DCE enough for Indian scenario

Background: The incidence of prostatic carcinoma is increasing worldwide. With its high resolution, ability to provide excellent tissue characterization and multiplanar imaging capabilities, multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) plays a crucial role in detection, local staging and follow-up of carcinoma prostate. It also helps guide targeted biopsies in initial biopsy negative patient. Objectives: Study diagnostic accuracy of mp-MRI and primarily that of the three MR sequences T2, DWI and DCE in detection of prostatic cancer by correlating them with histopathology and thus whether it is feasible for a short MRI of 3 sequences to be used on a large scale in Indian scenario. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was done at a tertiary care hospital between April 2017 to November 2018 in which 50 patients who presented with suspicion of prostate cancer were referred to radiology department for evaluation using MRI. MRIexamination was done using 3T Siemens Magnetom Verio. Followed by this MRI directed TRUS guided cognitive fusion biopsy was done from the prostate. Samples were sent for histopathology. Results: Out of 50 cases studied, 24 cases (48%) were found to be malignant and 26 cases (52 %) were benign on histopathology. In our study, combined T2 + DWI + DCE gave sensitivity of 95.83 %, specificity of 57.69%, positive predictive value of 68.21 % and negative predictive value of 93.75%. Conclusion: Multiparametric MRI using T2, DWI and DCE has a high diagnostic accuracy for evaluation of prostatic cancer.

PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA

The aim: To determine prognostic significance of mpMRI in prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) diagnostics. Materials and methods: The results of examination of 52 patients with PIN were assessed in mpMRI using PIRADS criteria. The total number of samples with PIN amounted 166. According to PIRADS MRI assessment of central and peripherial zones was made separately. The use of T2WI, DWI, DCE in patients with high grade and low grade PIN was studied. MRI was performed before prostate biopsy (MRI cognitive fusion biopsy). During 3-year follow-up rebiopsies were performed with prostate cancer detection. PIRADS values of PIN lesions with malignisation were compared with those without following tumor transformation. Results: There was a difference in values of PIRADS characteristics between PIN and benign prostatic tissue. The mean of PIRADS gradation in samples with PIN was 2,1. Among them 47 (28,3 %) PIN samples had gradation 3 (the presence of clinically significant cancer is equivocal), in 8 (4,8 %) cases - gradation 4 (clinically significant cancer is likely to be present). The mean of PIRADS gradation was in 24 % larger in cases with subsequent PC detection than in cases without malignisation. Conclusions: MRI parameters in PIN cases differ from normal prostate tissue. PIRADS assessment has prognostic significance of following malignisation of PIN pieces that have similar properties on MRI as prostate cancer. Further study is required to stratify all PIN patients into groups of high malignisation risk in order to perform detailed examination and treatment.

A non-randomized prospective study on the diagnostic performance of perineal prostatic biopsy, directed via diffusion nuclear resonance, in patients with suspected prostate cancer and previous negative transrectal prostate biopsy.

A definition of the best strategy is necessary to optimize the follow-up of patients with previous negative transrectal guided ultrasound biopsy (TRUS-GB) and the persistence of raised prostate-specific antigen (PSA).The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic rate of targeted transperineal ultrasound guided biopsy (TPUS-GB) with cognitive multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) registration with concurrent systematic biopsy in patients with previous negative systematic TRUS-GB and persistently elevated PSA levels. In this prospective study conducted at the University Infanta Sofia Hospital from April 2016 to November 2017, patients with one previous negative systematic TRUS-GB and persistently high PSA levels were referred for mpMRI prostate scans. All patients underwent systematic TPUS-GB and those patients with suspicious findings on mpMRI scans, Pirads 3 and 4-5, underwent a subsequent cognitive guidance mpMRI-TPUS-GB. In total, 71 patients were included in this study. Suspicious findings on mpMRI scans prior to TPUS-GB were found in 50 patients (70.4%). 16 patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer (22.5%), of whom 14 (87.5%) had a mpMRI scan with Pirads 3 or Pirads 4-5. Patients with Pirads 3, 4 or 5 showed negative results in almost all cores taken by concurrent systematic TPUS-GB. Cognitive mpMRI-TPUS fusion biopsy is a useful tool to diagnose PCa in patients with previous negative prostate biopsy. The samples obtained from the suspicious areas in the mpMRI detect more cases of intermediate and high risk PCa compared to the samples obtained at random or from non-suspicious areas.

Can multiparametric ultrasound improve cognitive MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy.

To evaluate the accuracy of multiparametric transrectal ultrasound (contrast- enhanced ultrasound plus elastosonography) in the detection of the suspicious area diagnosed by multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMRI). From June 2018 to June 2019 60 men (median age 63 years) with persistent suspicion of cancer underwent repeat saturation biopsy following pelvic mpMRI and the lesions characterized by a PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) score ≥ 3 were submitted to 4 additional cores by transperineal cognitive fusion biopsy (TPBx). All patients, before prostate biopsy, underwent contrast- enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) following intravenous administration of a bolus of Sonovue® (2.4 mg of nonpyrogenic suspension of phospholipid/sulphur hexaphloride); in addition, a transrectal elastosonography (TRES) was done to evaluate prostate tissue elasticity. The accuracy of multiparametric ultrasound to detect the mpMRI lesions was evaluated. In 27/60 (45%) of men a T1c prostate cancer (PCa) was diagnosed by TPBx and 21 (77.8%) of them were classified as clinically significant cancer (csPCa); in detail, 16/21 (76.2%) vs. 5/21 (23.8%) csPCa were located in the peripheric and anterior zone of the gland, respectively. Median total PSA was 10.3 ng/ml (range: 4.9-51 ng/ml). TRES and CEUS were positive for csPCa only in 6/21 (28.5%) and 13/21 (62%) of TPBx showing an increased accuracy directly related with the PI-RADS scores Conclusions: Multiparametric ultrasound using TRES and CEUS after Sonovue® administration did not improve the accuracy of TPBx in diagnosing csPCa.

Impact of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging on biopsy and radical prostatectomy grade concordance.

Adoption of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before biopsy is based on evidence demonstrating superior detection of clinically significant prostate cancer on biopsy. Whether this is due to the detection of otherwise occult higher grade cancers or preferential sampling of higher grade areas within an otherwise low-grade cancer is unknown. To distinguish these two possibilities, this study examined the effect of prebiopsy MRI on the rate of pathologic upgrading and downgrading at prostatectomy in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data from 2010 to 2015. Logistic regression was performed to assess the effect of MRI use on the Gleason grade change between biopsy and prostatectomy. Among biopsy-naive men, those who underwent prebiopsy MRI had higher odds of downgrading at prostatectomy (odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.66). In contrast, the odds of upgrading were significantly lower for men who underwent prebiopsy MRI (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.99). Limitations included a low overall rate of MRI-utilization prior to biopsy and an inability to distinguish between template, software-assisted and cognitive fusion biopsy. Prebiopsy MRI is associated with both oversampling of higher grade areas, which results in downgrading at prostatectomy, and the detection of otherwise occult higher grade lesions, which results in less upgrading at prostatectomy.