Codon-anticodon Mismatches Research Articles

Alternate RNA decoding results in stable and abundant proteins in mammals.

Amino acid substitutions may substantially alter protein stability and function, but the contribution of substitutions arising from alternate translation (deviations from the genetic code) is unknown. To explore it, we analyzed deep proteomic and transcriptomic data from over 1,000 human samples, including 6 cancer types and 26 healthy human tissues. This global analysis identified 60,024 high confidence substitutions corresponding to 8,801 unique sites in proteins derived from 1,990 genes. Some substitutions are shared across samples, while others exhibit strong tissue-type and cancer specificity. Surprisingly, products of alternate translation are more abundant than their canonical counterparts for hundreds of proteins, suggesting sense codon recoding. Recoded proteins include transcription factors, proteases, signaling proteins, and proteins associated with neurodegeneration. Mechanisms contributing to substitution abundance include protein stability, codon frequency, codon-anticodon mismatches, and RNA modifications. We characterize sequence motifs around alternatively translated amino acids and how substitution ratios vary across protein domains, tissue types and cancers. The substitution ratios are positively associated with intrinsically disordered regions and genetic polymorphisms in gnomAD, though the polymorphisms cannot account for the substitutions. Both the sequence and the tissue-specificity of alternatively translated proteins are conserved between human and mouse. These results demonstrate the contribution of alternate translation to diversifying mammalian proteomes, and its association with protein stability, tissue-specific proteomes, and diseases.

Structural basis for reduced ribosomal A-site fidelity in response to P-site codon–anticodon mismatches

Rapid and accurate translation is essential in all organisms to produce properly folded and functional proteins. mRNA codons that define the protein-coding sequences are decoded by tRNAs on the ribosome in the aminoacyl (A) binding site. The mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon interaction is extensively monitored by the ribosome to ensure accuracy in tRNA selection. While other polymerases that synthesize DNA and RNA can correct for misincorporations, the ribosome is unable to correct mistakes. Instead, when a misincorporation occurs, the mismatched tRNA-mRNA pair moves to the peptidyl (P) site and, from this location, causes a reduction in the fidelity at the A site, triggering post-peptidyl transfer quality control. This reduced fidelity allows for additional incorrect tRNAs to be accepted and for release factor 2 (RF2) to recognize sense codons, leading to hydrolysis of the aberrant peptide. Here, we present crystal structures of the ribosome containing a tRNALys in the P site with a U•U mismatch with the mRNA codon. We find that when the mismatch occurs in the second position of the P-site codon-anticodon interaction, the first nucleotide of the A-site codon flips from the mRNA path to engage highly conserved 16S rRNA nucleotide A1493 in the decoding center. We propose that this mRNA nucleotide mispositioning leads to reduced fidelity at the A site. Further, this state may provide an opportunity for RF2 to initiate premature termination before erroneous nascent chains disrupt the cellular proteome.

Alignment-based and alignment-free methods converge with experimental data on amino acids coded by stop codons at split between nuclear and mitochondrial genetic codes

Genetic codes mainly evolve by reassigning punctuation codons, starts and stops. Previous analyses assuming that undefined amino acids translate stops showed greater divergence between nuclear and mitochondrial genetic codes. Here, three independent methods converge on which amino acids translated stops at split between nuclear and mitochondrial genetic codes: (a) alignment-free genetic code comparisons inserting different amino acids at stops; (b) alignment-based blast analyses of hypothetical peptides translated from non-coding mitochondrial sequences, inserting different amino acids at stops; (c) biases in amino acid insertions at stops in proteomic data. Hence short-term protein evolution models reconstruct long-term genetic code evolution. Mitochondria reassign stops to amino acids otherwise inserted at stops by codon-anticodon mismatches (near-cognate tRNAs). Hence dual function (translation termination and translation by codon-anticodon mismatch) precedes mitochondrial reassignments of stops to amino acids. Stop ambiguity increases coded information, compensates endocellular mitogenome reduction. Mitochondrial codon reassignments might prevent viral infections.

Cryptic tRNAs in chaetognath mitochondrial genomes

The chaetognaths constitute a small and enigmatic phylum of little marine invertebrates. Both nuclear and mitochondrial genomes have numerous originalities, some phylum-specific. Until recently, their mitogenomes seemed containing only one tRNA gene (trnMet), but a recent study found in two chaetognath mitogenomes two and four tRNA genes. Moreover, apparently two conspecific mitogenomes have different tRNA gene numbers (one and two). Reanalyses by tRNAscan-SE and ARWEN softwares of the five available complete chaetognath mitogenomes suggest numerous additional tRNA genes from different types. Their total number never reaches the 22 found in most other invertebrates using that genetic code. Predicted error compensation between codon-anticodon mismatch and tRNA misacylation suggests translational activity by tRNAs predicted solely according to secondary structure for tRNAs predicted by tRNAscan-SE, not ARWEN. Numbers of predicted stop-suppressor (antitermination) tRNAs coevolve with predicted overlapping, frameshifted protein coding genes including stop codons. Sequence alignments in secondary structure prediction with non-chaetognath tRNAs suggest that the most likely functional tRNAs are in intergenic regions, as regular mt-tRNAs. Due to usually short intergenic regions, generally tRNA sequences partially overlap with flanking genes. Some tRNA pairs seem templated by sense-antisense strands. Moreover, 16S rRNA genes, but not 12S rRNAs, appear as tRNA nurseries, as previously suggested for multifunctional ribosomal-like protogenomes.

Coding Constraints Modulate Chemically Spontaneous Mutational Replication Gradients in Mitochondrial Genomes

Distances from heavy and light strand replication origins determine duration mitochondrial DNA remains singlestranded during replication. Hydrolytic deaminations from A->G and C->T occur more on single- than doublestranded DNA. Corresponding replicational nucleotide gradients exist across mitochondrial genomes, most at 3rd, least 2nd codon positions. DNA singlestrandedness during RNA transcription causes gradients mainly in long-lived species with relatively slow metabolism (high transcription/replication ratios). Third codon nucleotide contents, evolutionary results of mutation cumulation, follow replicational, not transcriptional gradients in Homo; observed human mutations follow transcriptional gradients. Synonymous third codon position transitions potentially alter adaptive off frame information. No mutational gradients occur at synonymous positions forming off frame stops (these adaptively stop early accidental frameshifted protein synthesis), nor in regions coding for putative overlapping genes according to an overlapping genetic code reassigning stop codons to amino acids. Deviation of 3rd codon nucleotide contents from deamination gradients increases with coding importance of main frame 3rd codon positions in overlapping genes (greatest if these are 2nd position in overlapping genes). Third codon position deamination gradients calculated separately for each codon family are strongest where synonymous transitions are rarely pathogenic; weakest where transitions are frequently pathogenic. Synonymous mutations affect translational accuracy, such as error compensation of misloaded tRNAs by codon-anticodon mismatches (prevents amino acid misinsertion despite tRNA misacylation), a potential cause of pathogenic mutations at synonymous codon positions. Indeed, codon-family-specific gradients are inversely proportional to error compensation associated with gradient-promoted transitions. Deamination gradients reflect spontaneous chemical reactions in singlestranded DNA, but functional coding constraints modulate gradients.

Error compensation of tRNA misacylation by codon–anticodon mismatch prevents translational amino acid misinsertion

Codon–anticodon mismatches and tRNA misloadings cause translational amino acid misinsertions, producing dysfunctional proteins. Here I explore the original hypothesis whether mismatches tend to compensate misacylation, so as to insert the amino acid coded by the codon. This error compensation is promoted by the fact that codon–anticodon mismatch stabilities increase with tRNA misacylation potentials (predicted by ‘tfam’) by non-cognate amino acids coded by the mismatched codons for most tRNAs examined. Error compensation is independent of preferential misacylation by non-cognate amino acids physico-chemically similar to cognate amino acids, a phenomenon that decreases misinsertion impacts. Error compensation correlates negatively with (a) codon/anticodon abundance (in human mitochondria and Escherichia coli); (b) developmental instability (estimated by fluctuating asymmetry in bilateral counts of subdigital lamellae, in each of two lizard genera, Anolis and S celoporus); and (c) pathogenicity of human mitochondrial tRNA polymorphisms. Patterns described here suggest that tRNA misacylation is sometimes compensated by codon–anticodon mismatches. Hence translation inserts the amino acid coded by the mismatched codon, despite mismatch and misloading. Results suggest that this phenomenon is sufficiently important to affect whole organism phenotypes, as shown by correlations with pathologies and morphological estimates of developmental stability.

Do anticodons of misacylated tRNAs preferentially mismatch codons coding for the misloaded amino acid?

BackgroundAccurate amino acid insertion during peptide elongation requires tRNAs loaded by cognate amino acids and that anticodons match codons. However, tRNA misloading does not necessarily cause misinsertions: misinsertion is avoided when anticodons mismatch codons coding for misloaded amino acids.Presentation of the hypothesisOccasional compensation of misacylation by codon-anticodon mismatch necessarily occurs. Putatively, occasional error compensation may be enhanced beyond the random combination of independent errors in tRNA loading and codon-anticodon interactions: tRNA misacylation might alter potentials for codon-anticodon mismatches, perhaps specifically increasing potentials for mismatching those codons coding for the misacylated non-cognate amino acid. This hypothetical phenomenon is called 'error coordination', in distinction from 'error compensation' that assumes independence between misacylation and mismatch.Testing the hypothesisEventually, the hypothesis should be tested for each combination of amino acid misacylation and codon-anticodon mismatch, by comparing stabilities or frequencies of mismatched codon-anticodon duplexes formed by tRNAs loaded by their cognate amino acid with stabilities formed by that tRNA when misloaded with the amino acid coded by the mismatched codon. Competitive mismatching experiments between misloaded and correctly loaded tRNAs could also be useful, yet more sophisticated experiments.Implications of the hypothesisDetecting error coordination implies estimating error compensation, which also promotes protein synthesis accuracy. Hence even in the absence of evidence for error coordination, experiments would yield very useful insights into misacylation and mismatch processes. In case experiments consider post-transcriptional RNA modifications (especially at wobble positions), results on codon-anticodon mismatches would enable significant improvements and sophistications of secondary structure prediction softwares. Positive results would show that protein translation enhances accuracies of products, not of single steps in the production. Ancient translational machineries putatively optimized error coordination, especially before tRNA editing by tRNA synthetases evolved: few primitive, but functionally versatile tRNA species perhaps executed low accuracy translation. Systems artificially designed/selected for low complexity and high efficiency could make use of this property for anticodons with high levels of error compensation and coordination.

Ribosomal position and contacts of mRNA in eukaryotic translation initiation complexes

The position of mRNA on 40S ribosomal subunits in eukaryotic initiation complexes was determined by UV crosslinking using mRNAs containing uniquely positioned 4-thiouridines. Crosslinking of mRNA positions (+)11 to ribosomal protein (rp) rpS2(S5p) and rpS3(S3p), and (+)9-(+)11 and (+)8-(+)9 to h18 and h34 of 18S rRNA, respectively, indicated that mRNA enters the mRNA-binding channel through the same layers of rRNA and proteins as in prokaryotes. Upstream of the P-site, the proximity of positions (-)3/(-)4 to rpS5(S7p) and h23b, (-)6/(-)7 to rpS14(S11p), and (-)8-(-)11 to the 3'-terminus of 18S rRNA (mRNA/rRNA elements forming the bacterial Shine-Dalgarno duplex) also resembles elements of the bacterial mRNA path. In addition to these striking parallels, differences between mRNA paths included the proximity in eukaryotic initiation complexes of positions (+)7/(+)8 to the central region of h28, (+)4/(+)5 to rpS15(S19p), and (-)6 and (-)7/(-)10 to eukaryote-specific rpS26 and rpS28, respectively. Moreover, we previously determined that eukaryotic initiation factor2alpha (eIF2alpha) contacts position (-)3, and now report that eIF3 interacts with positions (-)8-(-)17, forming an extension of the mRNA-binding channel that likely contributes to unique aspects of eukaryotic initiation.

Translation mechanism and regulation: old players, new concepts

The meeting on Translational Control and Non‐Coding RNA took place between 8 and 12 November 2006, in Nove Hrady, the Czech Republic, and was organized by M. Pospisek and L. Valasek. ![][1] Many pathways that regulate gene expression target the complex process of protein synthesis and in particular its initiation stage. During the past 40 years or so, all the initiation factors required for the assembly of translationally competent ribosomes have been identified and their principal roles determined. Recently, there has been significant progress in determining the structure of the components of the translation apparatus: from crystal structures of prokaryotic ribosomes, to crystal and nuclear magnetic resonance structures of factors, and cryo‐electron microscopy reconstructions of functional ribosomal complexes. These advances now allow the molecular mechanisms of the stages involved in initiation to be investigated in detail. Concurrently, diverse studies have revealed that translational control regulates processes ranging from development to learning. This meeting highlighted recent advances about canonical and internal ribosome entry site (IRES)‐mediated mechanisms of eukaryotic initiation, and the control of translation during development in response to stress and by mechanisms ranging from signal transduction pathways to regulation by noncoding RNAs and RNA‐binding proteins. Canonical 5′‐end‐dependent eukaryotic translation initiation requires at least 11 initiation factors (eIFs) and occurs in two stages: formation of the 48S initiation complex at the AUG codon of messenger RNA (mRNA), and its joining with a 60S ribosomal subunit (Fig 1; Hinnebusch et al , 2007; Pestova et al , 2007). eIF1 has a crucial role in the selection of initiation codons, allowing scanning 43S complexes to discriminate against codon–anticodon mismatches and preventing premature eIF5‐induced hydrolysis of eIF2‐bound GTP and Pi release. According to a recent model, eIF1—in cooperation with eIF1A—promotes a scanning‐competent ‘open’ conformation of the 43S complex. The establishment of codon–anticodon base‐pairing leads … [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gif

Multiple stages in codon–anticodon recognition:double-trigger mechanisms and geometric constraints

Thirty years of kinetic studies on tRNA selection in the elongation cycle are reviewed, and confronted with results derived from various sources, including structural studies on the ribosome, genetic observations on ribosome and EF–Tu accuracy mutants, and codon-specific elongation rates. A coherent framework is proposed, which gives meaning to many puzzling effects. Ribosomal accuracy would be governed by a “double-trigger” principle, according to which the ribosome uses energy in the forward direction to create new configurations for tRNA selection, and energy in the backward direction to regain its initial configuration, in particular after a premature dissociation event. The conformation energy would come in part, in Hopfield's mode, from GTP cleavage on the ternary complex (TC). The reset energy would be provided in part, in the author's mode, from GTP cleavage on a binary EF–Tu.GTP complex (BC). There would be several paths for amino acid incorporation. The path of highest accuracy would involve TC binding followed by BC binding, followed either by GTP hydrolysis on the TC, or by TC dissociation and GTP hydrolysis on the BC. Codon–anticodon recognition would occur in at least three kinetically and geometrically distinct stages. In a first stage, there would be a very rapid sorting of the TCs with unstrained anticodons contacting a loosely held mRNA. This stage ends with the anchoring of the codon–anticodon complex by a cluster of three nucleotides of 16S RNA. The second stage would be the most discriminative one. It would operate on the 5 ms time scale and terminate with GTP cleavage on the TC. The third stage would provide a last, crude selection involving “naked” aa-tRNA, partially held back by steric hindrance. Streptomycin and most EF–Tu mutants as well as high accuracy ribosomal mutants would produce specific alterations at stage 2, which are mapped on the stage 2 kinetic mechanism. The ram ribosomal ambiguity mutants, and anticodon position 37 modifications could be markers of stages 1 and 3 selection. Dissociation events at stage 2 or stage 3, when they are not immediately followed by reset events create a leaky state favorable to shortcut incorporation events. These events are equivalent to an “error-prone codon–anticodon mismatch repair”. From the recent evidence on ribosome structure, it is conjectured that the L7/L12 flexible stalk of the large ribosome subunit acts as a proofreading gate, and that the alternation of its GTPase activation center between “TCase” competence and “BCase” competence is a main factor in the control of accuracy.

The fidelity of translation initiation: reciprocal activities of eIF1, IF3 and YciH

Eukaryotic initiation factor eIF1 and the functional C-terminal domain of prokaryotic initiation factor IF3 maintain the fidelity of initiation codon selection in eukaryotes and prokaryotes, respectively, and bind to the same regions of small ribosomal subunits, between the platform and initiator tRNA. Here we report that these nonhomologous factors can bind to the same regions of heterologous subunits and perform their functions in heterologous systems in a reciprocal manner, discriminating against the formation of initiation complexes containing codon-anticodon mismatches. We also show that like IF3, eIF1 can influence initiator tRNA selection, which occurs at the stage of ribosomal subunit joining after eIF5-induced hydrolysis of eIF2-bound GTP. The mechanisms of initiation codon and initiator tRNA selection in prokaryotes and eukaryotes are therefore unexpectedly conserved and likely involve related conformational changes induced in the small ribosomal subunit by factor binding. YciH, a prokaryotic eIF1 homologue, could perform some of IF3's functions, which justifies the possibility that YciH and eIF1 might have a common evolutionary origin as initiation factors, and that IF3 functionally replaced YciH in prokaryotes.

Position of eukaryotic initiation factor eIF1 on the 40S ribosomal subunit determined by directed hydroxyl radical probing.

Eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) eIF1 maintains the fidelity of initiation codon selection by enabling 43S complexes to reject codon-anticodon mismatches, to recognize the initiation codon context, and to discriminate against establishing a codon-anticodon interaction with AUGs located <8 nt from the 5'-end of mRNA. To understand how eIF1 plays its discriminatory role, we determined its position on the 40S ribosomal subunit using directed hydroxyl radical cleavage. The cleavage of 18S rRNA in helices 23b, 24a, and 44 by hydroxyl radicals generated from Fe(II) tethered to seven positions on the surface of eIF1 places eIF1 on the interface surface of the platform of the 40S subunit in the proximity of the ribosomal P-site. The position of eIF1 on the 40S subunit suggests that although eIF1 is unable to inspect the region of initiation codon directly, its position close to the P-site is very favorable for an indirect mechanism of eIF1's action by influencing the conformation of the platform of the 40S subunit and the positions of mRNA and initiator tRNA in initiation complexes. Unexpectedly, the position of eIF1 on the 40S subunit was strikingly similar to the position on the 30S ribosomal subunit of the sequence and structurally unrelated C-terminal domain of prokaryotic initiation factor IF3, which also participates in initiation codon selection in prokaryotes.

Decoding at the ribosomal A site. The effect of a defined codon-anticodon mismatch upon the behavior of bound aminoacyl transfer RNA.

Ribosomes from Escherichia coli were programmed by being allowed to bind a molecule of tRNAMetf or fMet-tRNAMetf and the hexanucleotide messenger AUGN1N2N3. The interaction of the ternary complex [EF-Tu X GTP X Phe-tRNAPhe] with the A site (containing the codon N1N2N3) was then studied by measuring the extent of (i) the binding of Phe-tRNAPhe to the ribosome, (ii) the hydrolysis of GTP, and (iii) the formation of the dipeptide fMet-Phe. By variation of N1,N2, and N3, a defined degree and position of mismatch could be obtained; the correct A-site codon UUU was compared with the incorrect codons CUU, UCU, GUU, and UUG. Each single-point alteration led to catalytic hydrolysis of GTP and to a strong reduction in the amounts of Phe-tRNAPhe binding and of dipeptide formation. The observations were explicable qualitatively by a hypothesis according to which the behavior of the bound aa-tRNA, after hydrolysis of GTP and before peptidyl transfer, is determined principally by the energy of binding of the aminoacyl-tRNA to the A site. This binding in turn was found to depend upon both the nature and the position of the mismatch. The results further suggest a steric interplay between the 3' (acceptor) end of the A-site tRNA and the second and third positions of the anticodon, so that a mismatch at one of these positions can impair directly the interaction between the aminoacylated 3' end and the ribosome and can thus reduce the rate of peptide bond formation and contribute to the overall fidelity of the elongation cycle.