Co-expression Of PD-L1 Research Articles

Immunohistochemical Profiling of SSTR2 and HIF-2α with the Tumor Microenvironment in Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.

Metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are rare endocrine malignancies with limited effective treatment options. The association between the tumor microenvironment (TME) with somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) and hypoxia-induced factor-2α (HIF-2α) in PPGLs, critical for optimizing combination therapeutic strategies with immunotherapy, remains largely unexplored. To evaluate the association of SSTR2 and HIF-2α immunoreactivity with the TME in patients with PPGLs, we analyzed the expression of SSTR2A, HIF-2α, and TME components, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD4 and CD8), tumor-associated macrophages (CD68 and CD163), and PD-L1, using immunohistochemistry in patients with PPGLs. The primary outcome was to determine the association of the immune profiles with SSTR2A and HIF-2α expression. Among 45 patients with PPGLs, SSTR2A and HIF2α were positively expressed in 21 (46.7%) and 14 (31.1%) patients, respectively. The median PD-L1 immunohistochemical score (IHS) was 2.0 (interquartile range: 0-30.0). Positive correlations were observed between CD4, CD8, CD68, and CD163 levels. A negative correlation was found between the CD163/CD68 ratio (an indicator of M2 polarization) and SSTR2A expression (r = -0.385, p = 0.006). HIF-2α expression showed a positive correlation with PD-L1 IHS (r = 0.348, p = 0.013). The co-expression of PD-L1 (HIS > 10) and HIF-2α was found in seven patients (15.6%). No associations were observed between SDHB staining results and the CD163/CD68 ratio, PD-L1, or SSTR2A expression. Our data suggest the potential of combination therapy with immunotherapy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy or HIF-2α inhibitors as a treatment option in selected PPGL populations.

Increased coexpression of PD-L1 and IDO1 is associated with poor overall survival in patients with NK/T-cell lymphoma.

Immunotherapy with programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade was effective in patients with NK/T-cell lymphoma. In addition to PD-L1, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 (IDO1) is one of the most promising immunotherapeutic targets. High proportions of PD-L1 and IDO1 proteins were observed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) from 230 newly diagnosed patients with NK/T lymphoma with tissue samples from three cancer centers and were associated with poor overall survival (OS) in patients with NK/T lymphoma. Importantly, the coexpression of PD-L1 and IDO1 was related to poor OS and short restricted mean survival time in patients with NK/T lymphoma and was an independent prognostic factor in the training cohorts, and which was also validated in 58 NK/T lymphoma patients (GSE90597). Moreover, a nomogram model constructed with PD-L1 and IDO1 expression together with age could provide concise and precise predictions of OS rates and median survival time. The high-risk group in the nomogram model had a positive correlation with CD4 + T-cell infiltration in the validation cohort, as did the immunosuppressive factor level. Therefore, high PD-L1 and IDO1 expression was associated with poor OS in patients with NK/T lymphoma. PD-L1 and IDO1 might be potential targets for future immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy for NK/T lymphoma.

Abstract PO1-25-03: Programmed Death-Ligand 1 and Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Breast Cancer

Abstract Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an immune checkpoint expressed in a wide range of malignancies leading to immune tolerance and cancer cell immune evasion. Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are key regulators of cancer cell proliferation, survival, and invasion. The Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) receptor, MET, and the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) are RTKs known for their tumorigenic potential in a variety of human malignancies. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) on the expression of PD-L1 in breast cancer cells and the effect of their combination with inflammatory cytokines. The study also assessed the association of the expression of the tumoral PD-L1 mRNA with each of MET and EGFR mRNA expression and the tumor features and treatment outcomes in breast cancer patients using the METABRIC dataset publicly available from cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics. The TKIs crizotinib [a MET inhibitor] and gefitinib [an EGFR inhibitor] were used as a single treatment and in combination with the cytokines; tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) or interferon-γ (INF-γ) in MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in vitro. The cells were also treated with the mitogens HGF and EGF. The viability of cells after the different treatments was determined using the MTT viability assay. The effects of the combination treatments were analyzed using combination index (CI) analysis. The expression level of PD-L1 in cancer cells was assessed using Western blotting. The combination treatment of crizotinib with TNF-α and INF-γ produced a synergistic growth inhibition of MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells with CI values of 0.31 and 0.55, respectively. Alternatively, combined crizotinib and TNF-α produced an antagonist effect on the viability of MCF7 cells (CI=2.49). The combination of gefitinib with TNF-α produced a synergistic growth inhibition in both MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells with CI values of 0.39 and 0.78, respectively. Alternatively, gefitinib resulted in an additive effect when combined with INF-γ (CI=0.99) and an antagonistic effect when combined with TNF-α (CI=2.68) in MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively. Treatment with HGF (50 and 100 ng/ml) increased the protein levels of PD-L1 while EGF (50 and 100 ng/ml) reduced its levels in MDA-MB-231 cells. Treatment with the TKIs crizotinib (0.1-4 µM) and gefitinib (1-40 µM) significantly reduced PD-L1 levels in MDA-MB-231 cells compared to vehicle-treated cells. The analysis of the METABRIC dataset revealed that the mRNA expression of PD-L1 was positively correlated with the mRNA expression of the EGFR gene (r= 0.081, p< 0.001) but not the MET gene. A double-high PD-L1/MET expression was significantly associated with younger age at diagnosis, high-grade carcinoma, greater tumor size, hormone receptor-negative status, HER2-positivity, and non-luminal disease compared to patients with a double-low PD-L1/MET expression. Similar findings were reported for patients with a double-high PD-L1/EGFR expression compared to patients with a double-low PD-L1/EGFR expression. Nevertheless, the mRNA expression of the PD-L1, MET, and EGFR genes as well as the co-expression of PD-L1/MET or PD-L1/EGFR genes did not affect the overall survival of breast cancer patients. Collectively, MET and EGFR TKIs could modulate the effects of inflammatory cytokines differently based on the type of cytokine and the molecular subtype of breast cancer cells. The expression of PD-L1 in breast cancer cells was upregulated by HGF while TKIs reduced its expression. The co-expression of the PD-L1 gene with MET and EGFR genes in breast cancer was associated with advanced disease presentation and worse prognosticators in patients. Together, TKIs that target MET or EGFR could be an appealing therapeutic target in breast cancer, particularly in younger patients with the non-luminal disease. Citation Format: Nehad Ayoub, Muhsen Al-Diabat, Moath Al-Shorman, Laith Al-Eitan. Programmed Death-Ligand 1 and Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-25-03.

Clinicopathological characteristics and tumor infiltrating immune cells associations of PD-L1 tumor expression in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Our study aimed to perform on Moroccan patients' non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) concerning the relationship between PD-L1 tumor expression, clinicopathological features and tumor infiltrating immune cells (ICs). This is a retrospective study (2019 to 2021) conducted on samples from Moroccan patients with NSCLC at the Pathological Anatomy Laboratory of Ibn Rochd University Hospital in Casablanca. Eligible participants for our study had to meet the following predefined criteria: age ≥18 years, histologically confirmed NSCLC, no prior therapeutic interventions, availability of clinical and pathological data, and a usable tumor sample for determining PD-L1 status. Exclusion criteria applied to patients with other types of lung cancer and unusable tumor samples. The evaluation of tumor and immune expression of PD-L1 was performed using immunohistochemistry (IHC), with the 22C3 clone on the Dako Autostainer Link 48 platform. Tumor PD-L1 expression was categorized into 3 levels: TPS <1% (negative expression), TPS 1-49% (low expression), and TPS ≥50% (high expression). ICs infiltrating the tumor expressing PD-L1 were considered positive when more than 1% of positive ICs were present. Among the 316 analyzed samples, 56.6% showed a negative expression of PD-L1, 16.8% displayed a low expression of PD-L1, and 26.6% exhibited a strong expression. Regarding the histological type, among patients with TPS ≥ 50%, 25.8% had adenocarcinoma. Among patients with TPS ≥ 50%, 24.81% were smokers. PD-L1 was also strongly expressed in the lung (28.2%) and bronchi (26.5%). PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 50%) was observed in 35.29% of early-stage patients. Concerning tumor cells (TCs), 27.5% of tumors infiltrated by ICs had TPS ≥ 50%. Furthermore, coexpression of PD-L1 on both TCs and ICs infiltrating the tumor was found in 27.8% of tumors. Statistical analysis demonstrated a significant association between tumor PD-L1 expression and smoking status (P=0.019). However, no significant difference was observed between PD-L1 expression and the presence of ICs infiltrating the tumor (P=0.652), as well as the IHC expression of PD-L1 on ICs (P=0.259). Our results demonstrate a significant association between PD-L1 expression and smoking status. However, no significant association was observed between PD-L1 expression and the presence of infiltrating ICs, nor with the IHC expression of PD-L1 on ICs. Our data underscore the importance of participating in the study of specific factors influencing PD-L1 expression in patients with NSCLC.

Identification of CNKSR1 as a biomarker for “cold” tumor microenvironment in lung adenocarcinoma: An integrative analysis based on a novel workflow

BackgroundTherapies targeting PD1/PD-L1 pathway have revolutionized the treatment of lung cancer. However, anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapies have proven beneficial for only a select group of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients and generally do not work for immuno-cold tumors characterized by a lack of immune cell infiltration. Identifying novel biomarkers is vital to broad therapeutic options for LUAD patients with no response to anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapies. MethodsOur study has developed a novel strategy to identify a promising biomarker that addresses the limitations of anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in treating immunological cold tumors. We exacted LUAD RNA-seq data from the Cancer Genome Atlas database (TCGA). Using several machine learning methods, we identified the candidate biomarker. Based on the expression level of PD-L1 and the identified biomarker, samples were categorized into four groups. We further used ESTIMATE, ssGSEA, and CIBERSORT algorithms to calculate the immune infiltration level of each group. The results were validated in three independent bulk datasets and one scRNA-seq dataset. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) assessments were performed in clinical samples to further evaluate the coexpression of CNKSR1 and PD-L1, and to compare CD8 + T cell infiltration among groups. ResultsAfter comprehensive analyses, CNKSR1 was identified as a novel promising biomarker for immuno-cold LUAD. CNKSR1 mRNA expression levels exhibited a negative correlation with both PD-L1 mRNA expression and the extent of immune cell infiltration in LUAD. Besides, in contrast to the significant association between the expression of PD-L1 and the majority of other well-established or widely studied immune checkpoint molecules, a mutually exclusive expression pattern is observed between CNKSR1 and these molecules. The aforementioned results were consistent in validation datasets. The prognostic model built based on the CNKSR1 coexpression module also showed robust predictive performance. Additionally, IHC assessments have confirmed that the coexpression of CNKSR1 and PD-L1 is rare in LUAD samples. Notably, LUADs in the high-CNKSR1 group, characterized by high CNKSR1 but low PD- L1 expression, demonstrated reduced infiltration of CD8+ T cells. ConclusionsIn summary, CNKSR1 emerges as a promising biomarker for immune-cold LUADs, and the study into CNKSR1 modulating T-cell infiltration may lead to the identification of compensatory molecules to enhance the effectiveness of current immunotherapy for LUAD.

Abstract 1373: Gene expression correlation of immune checkpoint molecules Siglec-15 and PD-L1 varies widely by cancer indication

Abstract Siglec-15 is a novel target for immunotherapy in cancer and exhibits low mRNA expression in normal tissues but broad expression across cancer indications, specifically on tumor-associated macrophages and tumor cells [1]. Expression of Siglec-15 and the immune checkpoint molecule PD-L1 have previously been reported to be mutually exclusive [1][2]. However, a large-scale meta-analysis of this claim has not been undertaken across cancer indications. Here, RNA-Seq analyses were performed across single cells, cell lines, and bulk tumor samples for Siglec-15 and PD-L1 mRNA expression. Data and meta-data from TCGA, CCLE, and primary tumor samples from 62 studies were obtained through OmicSoft OncoLand and single cell analysis was performed on the BioTuring Talk2Data platform. Analyses were limited to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), cholangiocarcinoma, breast, thyroid, head and neck, colon, rectal, bladder, kidney, and endometrial cancers. Expression values were binned separately into percentiles across all indications and samples in increments of 10%. These analyses revealed individual gene expression levels of Siglec-15 and PD-L1 in bulk tumor samples varied substantially by indication, while co-expression of Siglec-15 and PD-L1 varied across indications. Analysis of gene expression of Siglec-15 and PD-L1 from the TCGA database showed a positive correlation in several indications including NSCLC, head and neck, kidney, and thyroid cancers. Analyses from additional studies in primary tumor samples confirmed co-expression of Siglec-15 and PD-L1 in NSCLC and head and neck cancer. Cell lines showed a similar trend of positive correlation with varying levels of Siglec-15 and PD-L1 expression. However, when examining expression at the single cell level (not bulk tumor), in 30 single cell studies spanning &amp;gt;1.3M cells, only 731 cells in 20 studies were found to co-express Siglec-15 and PD-L1 on the same cell while each gene was expressed individually on other cells. The majority of the cells co-expressing the genes were macrophages (n=~350), followed by CD4 (n=~115) and CD8 T cells (n=~50). This study demonstrates that at the bulk tumor level, Siglec-15 and PD-L1 mRNA expression are not broadly mutually exclusive across cancer indications and instead expression of each gene varies broadly within a given indication. Additionally, their expression is frequently positively correlated, including in NSCLC, head and neck, kidney, and thyroid cancers. These results also demonstrate that Siglec-15 and PD-L1 are rarely found co-expressed on same cell. These associations enable a better understanding of the landscape of target expression in patients across a wide variety of cancer indications and can inform combination strategies with anti-Siglec-15 therapies. [1] Sun J, et al. Clin Cancer Res, 2021;27(3):680-688. [2] Wang J, et al. Nat Med, 2019;25(4):656-666. Citation Format: Krystal Watkins, Liyang Diao, Marsha Crochiere, Jan Pinkas. Gene expression correlation of immune checkpoint molecules Siglec-15 and PD-L1 varies widely by cancer indication [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1373.

Expression Patterns of Immune Checkpoints in Breast Cancer Patients

Background: immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for solid tumors had significantly improved overall survival (OS). Positive response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockades was observed in the treatment of solid tumors. Breast cancer (BC) patients are no exception. However, the efficacy of immunocheckpoint therapy in BC patients remains poor. A particularly important factor is the lack of studies on the expression patterns of immune checkpoints in BC patients. Methods：This article summarizes the expression of immune checkpoints such as PD-1, PD-L1, STAT1, CTLA-4 in BC, and analyzes the relationship between the expression of these immune checkpoints and OS.Results: It was found that increased expression of PD-1, PD-L1, STAT1, CTLA-4 was associated with poor OS in BC patients. In addition, co-expression of PD-L1 with PD-1, STAT1or CTLA-4 and co-expression of PD-1 with CTLA-4was related to poor OS. We analyzed associations between the proportionate expression of PD-L1 and PD-1, PD-L1 and STAT1, PD-1 and CTLA-4, PD-1 and LAG3, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 in BC patients, there was significance in correlation in both of the BC patients. Conclusions: our results suggest that transcriptome-based co-expression of STAT1 and PD-L1 is a predictor for poor OS in BC patients, which might provide novel insight into designing combinational targeted therapy for BC.

Low co-expression of PD-L1 and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases HER2 and cMET in urothelial carcinoma is associated with discordant expression between primary and metastatic sites

Novel regimens targeting immune checkpoints and the cMET or HER2 pathways are under investigation in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) though co-expression of these molecular targets has not been defined. We sought to characterize the protein co-expression rates of PD-L1, cMET and HER2 in primary and metastatic mUC lesions and agreement rates in paired biopsies.We assessed PD-L1, cMET and HER2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in archival mUC samples identified from an institutional database (n = 143). Correlation of expression between primary and metastatic biopsies was performed in patients with available paired biopsies (n = 79). Protein expression levels by predefined thresholds were measured, and Cohen's kappa statistics (κ) were utilized to assess the agreement in expression between paired primary and metastatic samples.In primary tumors (n = 85), high expression of PD-L1, cMET, and HER2 was observed in 14.1%, 34.1%, and 12.9%, respectively. In metastatic samples (n = 143), high expression of PD-L1, cMET and HER2 was detected in 9.8%, 41.3%, and 9.8%, respectively. Expression agreement rates between paired specimens (n = 79) were PD-L1: 79.7% (κ = 0.09), cMET: 69.6% (κ = 0.35), HER2: 84.8% (κ = 0.17). High PD-L1/cMET co-expression was observed in only 5.1% (n = 4) of primary and 4.9% (n = 7) of metastatic specimens. High co-expression of PD-L1/HER2 occurred in 3.8% (n = 3) of primary samples and no metastatic samples. The overall co-expression agreement between paired samples was 55.7% (κ = 0.22) for PD-L1/cMET and 67.1% (κ = 0.06) for PD-L1/HER2, but agreement for high co-expression between paired samples was very low (2.5% for PD-L1/cMET and 0% for PD-L1/HER2).Tumor co-expression of high cMET or HER2 and PD-L1 is low in this cohort. Agreement of high co-expression between primary and metastatic sites is rare. Biomarker-based strategies used in selection of patients for contemporary trials testing combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with either cMET or HER2-targeted agents should account for discordant biomarker expression between primary and metastatic sites.

Co-Expression of Immunohistochemical Markers MRP2, CXCR4, and PD-L1 in Gallbladder Tumors Is Associated with Prolonged Patient Survival.

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare pathology in Western countries. However, it constitutes a relevant health problem in Asia and Latin America, with a high mortality in middle-aged Chilean women. The limited therapeutic options for GBC require the identification of targetable proteins with prognostic value for improving clinical management support. We evaluated the expression of targetable proteins, including three epithelial tumor markers, four proteins associated with multidrug and apoptosis resistance, and eleven immunological markers in 241 primary gallbladder adenocarcinomas. We investigated correlations between tumor marker expression, the primary tumor staging, and GBC patients' survival using automated immunohistochemistry, a semi-automatic method for image analysis, univariate and multivariate statistical analyses, and machine learning algorithms. Our data show a significant association between the expression of MRP2 (p = 0.0028), CXCR4 (p = 0.0423), and PD-L1 (p = 0.0264), and a better prognosis for patients with late-stage primary tumors. The expression of the MRP2/CXCR4/PD-L1 cluster of markers discriminates among short-, medium-, and long-term patient survival, with an ROC of significant prognostic value (AUC = 0.85, p = 0.0012). Moreover, a high MRP2/CXCR4/PD-L1 co-expression is associated with increased survival time (30 vs. 6 months, p = 0.0025) in GBC patients, regardless of tumor stage. Hence, our results suggest that the MRP2/CXCR4/PD-L1 cluster could potentially be a prognostic marker for GBC.

Characterization of immune checkpoints expression and lymphocyte densities of iranian breast cancer patients; the co-expression status and clinicopathological associates

BackgroundBreast malignancies are now the most common and deadliest type of neoplasms among women worldwide. Novel therapeutic approaches are needed to combat advanced stages of breast cancer. In this study, we aimed to investigate the expression and co-expression status of three immune checkpoints (PD-1, PD-L1, and LAG-3), as well as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) scores, and to further establish their potential correlations with clinicopathologic features.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study on 361 pathologic samples of breast cancer. Immunohistochemistry was performed to assess the status of the immune checkpoint markers, and H&E staining was used to score TILs. The correlations of the immune checkpoint markers of tumor cells and tumor-associated immune cells and TIL scores with clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed.ResultsOut of 361 assessed samples, LAG-3 was positive in 51%, while IC PD-L1 and TC PD-L1 were detectable in 36% and 8.9%, respectively. Moreover, both IC PD-L1 and LAG-3 stained positively in 24.4% of samples. IC PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in tumors with higher nuclear, mitotic, and overall grades and tubule formation. In addition, TC PD-L1 and LAG-3 exhibited a similar trend for higher overall grading. Tumors with positive estrogen- and progesterone-receptor (ER and PR) expression had significantly lower IC PD-L1 and TC PD-L1 staining, while LAG-3 positivity was more prevalent in HER2 positive samples. Tumors that were positive for these biomarkers had significantly higher Ki-67 scores. LAG-3 expression showed significant correlations with PD-1 and IC PD-L1 expression. Besides, the co-expression of LAG-3 and IC PD-L1 was significantly more encountered in luminal B and triple-negative subtypes, compared to the luminal A subtype. Regarding TILs, their scoring was significantly higher in ER and PR negative and HER2 positive samples. Intriguingly, samples with positive staining for LAG-3, IC PD-L1, and TC PD-L1 had significantly higher TIL scorings.ConclusionsImmune checkpoints show differentially different levels of expression in certain molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Moreover, they reveal a meaningful correlation with each other, proliferation indices, and histologic grades. Finally, a sizable proportion of breast cancers co-express PD-L1 and LAG-3, which will make them appropriate targets for future combined ICIs.

BiTE-Secreting CAR-γδT as a Dual Targeting Strategy for the Treatment of Solid Tumors.

HLA-G is considered as an immune checkpoint protein and a tumor-associated antigen. In the previous work, it is reported that CAR-NK targeting of HLA-G can be used to treat certain solid tumors. However, the frequent co-expression of PD-L1 and HLA-G) and up-regulation of PD-L1 after adoptive immunotherapy may decrease the effectiveness of HLA-G-CAR. Therefore, simultaneous targeting of HLA-G and PD-L1 by multi-specific CAR could represent an appropriate solution. Furthermore, gamma-delta T (γδT) cells exhibit MHC-independent cytotoxicity against tumor cells and possess allogeneic potential. The utilization of nanobodies offers flexibility for CAR engineering and the ability to recognize novel epitopes. In this study, Vδ2 γδT cells are used as effector cells and electroporated with an mRNA-driven, nanobody-based HLA-G-CAR with a secreted PD-L1/CD3ε Bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) construct (Nb-CAR.BiTE). Both in vivo and in vitro experiments reveal that the Nb-CAR.BiTE-γδT cells could effectively eliminate PD-L1 and/or HLA-G-positive solid tumors. The secreted PD-L1/CD3ε Nb-BiTE can not only redirect Nb-CAR-γδT but also recruit un-transduced bystander T cells against tumor cells expressing PD-L1, thereby enhancing the activity of Nb-CAR-γδT therapy. Furthermore, evidence is provided that Nb-CAR.BiTE redirectes γδT into tumor-implanted tissues and that the secreted Nb-BiTE is restricted to the tumor site without apparent toxicity.

Co-expression of PD-L1 and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases HER2 and cMET is low in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

533 Background: Activation of HER2 and cMET signaling has been implicated in the pathogenesis of urothelial carcinoma subsets, and the use of anti-PD-(L)1 agents is well established in this disease. Novel therapeutic combinations targeting both immune checkpoints and the cMET or HER2 pathways are currently under investigation in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Co-expression of these molecular targets has not been characterized in mUC. We hypothesized that the rate of PD-L1 co-expression with cMET and HER2 may be low. Therefore, we sought to define tumor protein co-expression of PD-L1, HER2 and cMET in a cohort of mUC patients. Methods: Patients with mUC were identified from an institutional database. FFPE tumor specimens from metastatic sites and available paired primary tumors underwent immunohistochemical staining for PD-L1 (SP-142), cMET, and HER2 expression. High expression was defined using the following thresholds: PD-L1: &gt;=5% of infiltrated immune cells; cMET: &gt;=50% of tumor cells; HER2: score=3+ (complete membrane staining that is intense and &gt;10% of tumor cells). Simple and Weighted Cohen’s kappa Statistics (κ) were utilized to assess the agreement in expression and co-expression between paired primary and metastatic samples. Cohen’s interpretation of the κ results is provided. Results: Specimens from 143 mUC patients were analyzed, including 79 with available paired primary tumors. In primary tumors (N=79), high expression of PD-L1, cMET, and HER2 was observed in 15.2%, 34.2%, and 12.7%, respectively. In metastatic samples (N=143), high expression of PD-L1, cMET and HER2 was detected in 9.8%, 41.3%, and 9.8%, respectively. Expression agreement rates between primary and metastatic specimens (n=79) were PD-L1: 79.7% (κ=0.09, slight agreement), cMET: 69.6% (κ=0.35, fair agreement), HER2: 84.8% (κ=0.17, slight agreement) and were driven by high prevalence of low expression. High PD-L1/cMET co-expression was observed in only 5.1% (n = 4) of primary and 4.9% (n =7) of metastatic specimens. High co-expression of PD-L1/HER2 occurred in only 3.8% (n=3) of primary samples and in no metastatic samples. The overall co-expression agreement rate between paired primary and metastatic samples was 55.7% (κ = 0.22, fair agreement) for PD-L1/cMET and 67.1% (κ = 0.06, slight agreement) for PD-L1/HER2. Importantly, however, agreements rates for high co-expression between primary and metastatic samples were very low (2.5% for PD-L1/cMET and 0% for PD-L1/HER2). Conclusions: Tumor co-expression of high cMET or HER2 and PD-L1 is low in this cohort of metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients. Furthermore, agreement of high co-expression between primary and metastatic sites is rare. These results suggest that investigational strategies combining immune checkpoint inhibition with either cMET or HER2 targeted agents in mUC may have limited synergistic activity.

Coexpression of PD-L1/PD-1 with CXCR3/CD36 and IL-19 Increase in Extranodal Lymphoma.

Many studies have demonstrated that PD-L1/PD-1 signaling is an immune evasion mechanism in tumors. PD-L1/PD-1 coexpression with CXCR3/CD36 in peripheral lymphocytes in lymphoma still needs to be clarified. The current study investigated PD-L1/PD-1 coexpression with CXCR3/CD36 in circulating lymphocytes, serum IL-19 levels, and their correlation with clinical outcome and extranodal involvement in lymphoma. Subjects and Methods. The coexpression of PD-L1/PD-1 with CXCR3/CD36 on circulating lymphocytes was analyzed by flow cytometry in 78 lymphoma patients before and after therapy and in 50 healthy controls. The concentration levels of IL-19 in serum were assessed by an ELISA. Results. PD-L1 and PD-1 were expressed on circulating CXCR3+ and CD36+ lymphocytes in lymphoma and were significantly higher in patients with extranodal involvement than in lymphoma patients without extranodal involvement (P < 0.001). Elevated IL-19 levels were observed in lymphoma patients and increased significantly in extranodal involvement (P < 0.001). High percentages of PD-L1+CXCR3+ and PD-1+CXCR3+ lymphocytes were associated with high LDH levels, hepatomegaly, lymphedema, advanced tumor stage, and recurrence. Furthermore, patients with splenomegaly and generalized lymphadenopathy had high percentages of PD-L1+CXCR3+ lymphocytes. In addition, levels of PD-L1/PD-1 coexpression with CXCR3 and IL-19 were significantly associated with bone marrow, lung, and lymph vessel involvement. Further analysis revealed that high percentages of PD-L1+CD36+ and PD-1+CD36+ lymphocytes were associated with lung and bone marrow involvement. Patients with high levels of PD-L1/PD-1 coexpression with CXCR3 and IL-19 had inferior event-free survival (EFS) compared with that in lymphoma patients with low levels. EFS was decreased in patients with high percentages of PD-L1+CD36+ and PD-1+CD36+ lymphocytes. When using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the superiority of IL-19 (area under the curve (AUC): 0.993) and PD-L1+CXCR3+% (AUC: 0.961) to PD-1+CXCR3+% (AUC: 0.805), PD-L1+CD36+% (AUC: 0.694), and PD-1+CD36+% (AUC 0.769) was evident in the diagnosis of extranodal involvement, identifying lymphoma patients with extranodal involvement from patients without extranodal involvement. Conclusions. Coexpression of PD-L1/PD-1 with CXCR3/CD36 in circulating lymphocytes and serum IL-19 levels contributes to poor prognosis and might be potential markers for extranodal involvement in lymphoma.

Relationship between PD-L1 expression and tumor stem cell marker CD44 as a promising basis for the development of new approaches to cancer targeted therapy

Immunotherapy of malignant tumors is a rapidly developing area of oncology. PD-1 is a receptor expressed by activated T-lymphocytes. As a result of its interaction with the ligand (PD-L1 or PD-L2), the activity of T-lymphocytes is inhibited and their apoptosis occurs. Drugs that inhibit the interaction of PD-1 with ligands have an immunostimulatory effect and are effective in the treatment of many types of neoplasms: melanoma, lung cancer, bladder cancer, stomach cancer, various lymphomas, etc. However, response to this treatment is observed only in a narrow cohort of patients. To increase the effectiveness of immunotherapy, combined preparations and nanoparticles are being developed and created to enhance the effect of PD-L1 inhibitors, and containing hyaluronic acid as a ligand for the CD44 protein, which is expressed in many human tumors. However, the issue of co-expression of CD44 and PD-L1 remains poorly understood. This review is devoted to describing the features of co-expression and the mechanisms of interaction between CD44 and PD-L1. Promising directions for the development of new approaches to the immunotherapy of malignant tumors are presented.

Significance of Siglec-15 expression in colorectal cancer: association with advanced disease stage and fewer tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.

Siglec-15, a novel immune suppressor, is upregulated in many human cancers. The aim of this study was to explore the expression of Siglec-15 in colorectal cancer (CRC), and investigate whether Siglec-15 could be a potential target for cancer immunotherapy in patients with CRC. We performed immunohistochemical analyses of Siglec-15 on a cohort of 805 patients with CRC and made comparisons between clinicopathological characteristics, PD-L1 expression, CD3, CD8, CD45RO tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and prognosis. We found that Siglec-15 expression was commonly detected in tumor cells (48.3%) and tumor-associated stromal cells (33.4%), and was more frequently observed than PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. In contrast, Siglec-15 expression was weakly and scarcely found in normal mucosa (13%). Siglec-15 overexpression in tumor cells was associated with advanced TNM stage (p=0.020). Co-expression of Siglec-15 and PD-L1 in tumor cells was found in 14.4% of patients, and Siglec-15 expression was detected in almost half of PD-L1 negative cases. Elevated Siglec-15 expression in tumor and stromal cells was associated with sparser CD45RO and CD8 TILs (p=0.035 and p=0.004, respectively). The expression of Siglec-15 did not have prognostic significance. In summary, compared to PD-L1, Siglec-15 protein expression is more prevalent in CRC and is associated with advanced disease stage and fewer TILs. These findings support Siglec-15 as a potential cancer immunotherapy target, in addition to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, in patients with CRC.

342P Prognostic implications of PD-L1 co-expression among Filipino EGFR MT mNSCLC

TKIs targeting EGFR MT are standard for mNSCLC. Reports suggest co-expression of PD-L1 may play a role in acquiring TKIS resistance. This PDL1 prognostic role remains largely debatable. This study reports the influence of PD-L1 among EGFR MT mNSCLC Filipino cohort.

MCT4/Lactate Promotes PD-L1 Glycosylation in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has the highest percentage of lymphocytic infiltration among breast cancer subtypes, and TNBC patients may benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. However, some cases whether the immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) shows low targeting efficiency have occurred and effective synergistic targets need to be found, which inspired our exploration of the co-expression analysis of MCT4 (SLC16A3) and PD-L1 (CD274) and their potential regulatory mechanisms. After bioinformatic analysis of the relationship between MCT4 and PD-L1, we validated their positive co-expression relationship in triple-negative breast cancer through multiple immunohistochemical staining (mIHC), CRISPR/Cas9, and lentiviral transduction for MCT4 knockout (sgMCT4/231 KO) or overexpression (pEGFP-N1-MCT4/231). We examined the effect of lactate treatment on PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer cells by qRT-PCR and Western blot. Combined with our results, we found that MCT4 positively regulated PD-L1 expression through discharging lactate and stabilized PD-L1 through promoting its glycosylation by the classic WNT pathway in MDA-MB-231 cells. More importantly, the high co-expression of MCT4 and PD-L1 appears to predict more effective targets for treating TNBC, which would improve immune checkpoint therapy for TNBC.

HHLA2 Immune Checkpoint Is a Novel Prognostic Predictor in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1 had low response rates and limited overall survival benefits in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We characterized the expression pattern and clinical significance of B7 family immune checkpoint proteins HHLA2, PD-L1, and B7-H4 in HCC. Immunohistochemistry for HHLA2, PD-L1, B7-H4, CD3, and CD8 was performed on tissue microarray slides from 103 surgically resected HCC specimens. Positive HHLA2 was detected in 63 (61.2%) cases, with 50 cases showing low expression and 13 cases showing high expression. Positive PD-L1 (combined positive score [CPS] ≥1) was detected in 27 (26.2%) cases, with the majority showing low expression (CPS <10) (n = 25) and only 2 cases showing high expression (CPS ≥10). The coexpression of PD-L1 and HHLA2 was observed in 17 (16.5%) cases. B7-H4 expression was detected in only one (1.0%) case. HHLA2-positive cases had significantly better survival than HHLA2-negative cases (P = .042). Positive HHLA2 correlated with higher density of CD8+ intratumoral lymphocytes (P = .015). The subgroup with both HHLA2 expression and high CD8+ cell density exhibited the most favorable prognosis (P = .036). HHLA2 is frequently expressed in HCC. Positive HHLA2 correlates with higher CD8+ cell density and favorable prognosis. HHLA2 may be considered a potential therapeutic immune target in HCC.

Coexpression of HHLA2 and PD-L1 on Tumor Cells Independently Predicts the Survival of Spinal Chordoma Patients.

BackgroundImmunotherapy only achieves efficacy in some cancer patients, and less is known about other immune checkpoint molecules in chordoma. Here, we aimed to determine the expression of PD-L1, HHLA2, B7H3, IDO-1 and Galectin-9 in spinal chordoma and evaluated their association with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), clinicopathological characteristics and survival of patients.MethodsUsing multiplexed quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF), we simultaneously measured the levels of five different immune checkpoint molecules and major TIL subsets in 92 human spinal chordoma samples.ResultsTumor HHLA2 and PD-L1 were positive in 80.0% and 86.0% of cases, respectively. However, B7H3, IDO-1 and Galectin-9 positivity on tumor cells were only seen in 21.0% of cases, despite all showing predominantly stromal expression. Coexpression of these QIF markers in the tumor compartment was scarcely detected except for PD-L1 and HHLA2, which was observed in 69.6% of cases. While tumoral HHLA2 and stromal B7H3 expressions were associated with an aggressive tumor phenotype, suppressive immune response (specifically including elevated PD-1+ TILs level and decreased CD8+ TIL density) and poor prognosis, stromal levels of PD-L1 and Galectin-9 predicted the opposite outcomes. Importantly, HHLA2 and PD-L1 coexpression on tumor cells independently predicted both worse local recurrence-free survival and overall survival.ConclusionThese data provide a better understanding of the immunosuppressive mechanism in chordoma and may be useful for the development of combination or novel immunotherapy approaches aiming to improve therapeutic efficacy and survival.

Association of PD-L1 and ZEB-1 expression patterns with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) are immune checkpoint inhibitors that play an important role in the host immune avoidance mechanism of tumors. The relationship between PD-L1 expression and malignancy has been reported in various types of cancer, such as lung and gastric cancer. In addition, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of cancer cells is deeply involved in the invasion and metastasis of cancer. It has been reported that zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB-1), an EMT inducer, contributes to metastasis in pancreatic and colon cancer. The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between the expression patterns of two markers, PD-L1 and ZEB-1, and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Biopsy or surgical excision specimens from 169 patients with OSCC were used in the present study. Immunohistochemical staining with monoclonal anti-PD-L1 antibody and anti-ZEB-1 antibody was conducted. Cases with >1% tumor cells positive for PD-L1 and those with >10% tumor cells positive for ZEB-1 were considered positive, respectively. The findings revealed that individual expression of PD-L1 and ZEB-1 in OSCC was not associated with tumor size, degree of differentiation or Yamamoto-Kohama invasion pattern classification. However, co-expression of PD-L1 and ZEB-1 was associated with higher cervical lymph node metastasis and a lower survival rate. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicated that co-expression of PD-L1 and ZEB-1 could serve as a potential marker for the prognosis of patients with OSCC.