Coadministration Of Zidovudine Research Articles

Zidovudine, an anti-viral drug, resensitizes gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine by inhibition of the Akt-GSK3β-Snail pathway.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most difficult malignancies to treat owing to the rapid acquisition of resistance to chemotherapy. Gemcitabine, a first-line treatment for pancreatic cancer, prolongs patient survival by several months, and combination treatment with gemcitabine and other anti-cancer drugs in the clinic do not show any significant effects on overall survival. Thus, identification of a drug that resensitizes gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer to gemcitabine and a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of gemcitabine resistance are critical to develop new therapeutic options for pancreatic cancer. Here, we report that zidovudine resensitizes gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer to gemcitabine as shown by screening a compound library, including clinical medicine, using gemcitabine-resistant cells. In analyzing the molecular mechanisms of zidovudine effects, we found that the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like phenotype and downregulation of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) are essential for the acquisition of gemcitabine resistance, and zidovudine restored these changes. The chemical biology investigations also revealed that activation of the Akt-GSK3β-Snail1 pathway in resistant cells is a key signaling event for gemcitabine resistance, and zidovudine resensitized resistant cells to gemcitabine by inhibiting this activated pathway. Moreover, our in vivo study demonstrated that co-administration of zidovudine and gemcitabine strongly suppressed the formation of tumors by gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer and prevented gemcitabine-sensitive pancreatic tumors from acquiring gemcitabine-resistant properties, inducing an EMT-like phenotype and downregulating hENT1 expression. These results suggested that co-treatment with zidovudine and gemcitabine may become a novel therapeutic strategy for pancreatic cancer by inhibiting chemoresistance-specific signaling.

In vitro interaction between Zidovudine and some adsorptive antacids

The in vitro interaction between zidovudine and three antacids and a commercial product was investigated. The extent of adsorption of zidovudine by the antacids, and the effects of the antacids on the disintegration time and dissolution of the drug from tablets were studied. Adsorption of the drug by the antacids followed the order; magnesium trisilicate > aluminium hydroxide > magnesium hydroxide. Retardation of dissolution amongst the antacids and commercial product was of the order; Jawasil® > magnesium trisilicate > aluminium hydroxide > magnesium hydroxide. Also, the degree of retardation of dissolution from the tablets increased as the amount of adsorbent increased. Co-administration of zidovudine and adsorptive antacid formulations should be avoided in clinical practice since it can lead to a decrease in the bioavailability of zidovudine, ultimately leading to therapeutic failure. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/dujps.v13i1.21853 Dhaka Univ. J. Pharm. Sci. 13(1): 1-6, 2014 (June)

Effect of concurrent zidovudine use on the resistance pathway selected by abacavir‐containing regimens

Abacavir (ABC) selects for four mutations (K65R, L74V, Y115F and M184V) in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT), both in vitro and during monotherapy in vivo. The aim of this analysis was to compare the selection of these and other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-associated mutations by ABC-containing therapies in the presence and absence of concurrent lamivudine (3TC) and/or zidovudine (ZDV) and to assess the effect of these mutations on phenotypic susceptibility to the NRTIs. This study was a retrospective analysis of the patterns of NRTI-associated mutations selected following virological failure in six multicentre trials conducted during the development of ABC. Virological failure was defined as confirmed vRNA above 400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL. RT genotype and phenotype were determined using standard methods. K65R was selected infrequently by ABC-containing regimens in the absence of ZDV (13 of 127 patients), while L74V/I was selected more frequently (51 of 127 patients). Selection of both K65R and L74V/I was significantly reduced by co-administration of ZDV with ABC (one of 86 and two of 86 patients, respectively). Y115F was uncommon in the absence (seven of 127 patients) or presence (four of 86 patients) of ZDV. M184V was the most frequently selected mutation by ABC alone (24 of 70 patients) and by ABC plus 3TC (48 of 70 patients). Thymidine analogue mutations were associated with ZDV use. The K65R mutation conferred the broadest phenotypic cross-resistance of the mutations studied. The resistance pathway selected upon virological failure of ABC-containing regimens is significantly altered by concurrent ZDV use, but not by concurrent 3TC use. These data may have important implications for the efficacy of subsequent lines of NRTI therapies.

307. A Mechanism for AZT Mediated Enhancement of Transgene Expression

Recombinant adeno-associated viral (rAAV) vectors have been used to treat hemophilia B by efficient transfer of F.IX into liver and muscle in animals; human trials are currently underway. In a recent dose-escalation study investigating muscle directed F.IX gene transfer using rAAV vectors, an HIV-positive subject who received the lowest vector dose showed highest F.IX expression levels. Coadministration of Zidovudine (3'-Azido-3'-deoxythymidine or AZT) during the trial was suggested as an explanation for this observation (Manno et al, Blood 101:8, 2003). AZT is a nucleoside analog that inhibits HIV reverse transcriptase activity. It has also been implicated in inhibiting DNA replication, in generation of oxygen radicals and in induction of transcription factors. We hypothesized a role for the AZT induced nuclear transcription factor, NF-kappaB, in enhancing gene expression by binding to the four consensus NF-kappaB binding sites in the CMV promoter of the vector. Previously, we have shown an AZT dependent increase (30-fold) in expression of a CMV promoter-driven transgene following transduction of HepG2 cells with an AAV vector. Similar experiments using a vector with an EF1alpha promoter showed no change in levels of transgene expression in response to AZT, indicating a CMV promoter-specific response. Western analysis of total cellular extracts from transduced cells cultured for up to 72h in the presence of different levels of AZT showed an increase in NF-kappaB (p65) levels with increasing AZT. NF-kappaB consensus sequence binding assays using nuclear extracts from AZT treated (0.4, 4 and 40mM) cells showed 1.5, 4.1 and 4.3-fold increase, respectively, in NF-kappaB levels over untreated samples. Reporter assays were performed using plasmids with a luciferase gene driven by either a TK (thymidine kinase) minimal promoter or an NF-kB4-TK promoter. Our results show increasing reporter expression (8-fold in 40mM AZT treatment) with increasing concentrations of AZT with NF-kB4-TK promoter, but not with the TK-minimal promoter. We further confirmed our findings by silencing the ATM gene, an activator of NF-kappaB, using siRNA. ATM silenced cells produced significantly lower levels of active NF-kappaB in nuclear extracts of cells treated with AZT. Moreover, the activity of the NF-kB4-TK luciferase promoter decreased 7-fold, indicating a specific role for ATM in CMV driven gene expression via NF-kappaB activation pathway. Our findings thus provide a molecular explanation for enhanced CMV-promoter driven gene expression in a clinical trial subject treated with Zidovudine and provide a novel avenue towards exploring the use of host transcription factors to significantly enhance gene transfer treatment strategies.

Clarithromycin lowers plasma zidovudine levels in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

The use of antiretroviral agents and drugs for the treatment and prophylaxis of opportunistic infections has lengthened the survival of persons with AIDS. In the era of multidrug therapy, drug interactions are important considerations in designing effective and tolerable regimens. Clarithromycin has had a significant impact on the treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection, and zidovudine is the best-studied and one of the most widely used antiretroviral agents in this population. We conducted a study to determine the maximally tolerated dose of clarithromycin and the pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin and zidovudine individually and in combination. Mixing studies were conducted to simulate potential interaction in the gastric environment. The simultaneous administration of zidovudine and clarithromycin had little impact on the pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin or of its major metabolite. However, coadministration of zidovudine and clarithromycin at three doses (500 mg orally [p.o.] twice daily [b.i.d.], 1,000 mg p.o. b.i.d., and 2,000 mg p.o. b.i.d.) reduced the maximum concentration of zidovudine by 41% (P < 0.005) and the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 h for zidovudine by 25% (P < 0.05) and increased the time to maximum concentration of zidovudine by 84% (P < 0.05), compared with zidovudine administered alone. Mixing studies did not detect the formation of insoluble complexes due to chelation, suggesting that the decrease in zidovudine concentrations results from some other mechanism. Simultaneous administration of zidovudine and clarithromycin appears to decrease the levels of zidovudine in serum, and it may be advisable that these drugs not be given at the same time. Drug interactions should be carefully evaluated in persons with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection who are receiving multiple pharmacologic agents.

Drug interactions with antiviral drugs.

Antiviral drug interactions are a particular problem among immuno-compromised patients because these patients are often receiving multiple different drugs, i.e. antiretroviral drugs and drugs effective against herpesvirus. The combination of zidovudine and other antiretroviral drugs with different adverse event profiles, such as didanosine, zalcitabine and lamivudine, appears to be well tolerated and no relevant pharmacokinetic interactions have been detected. The adverse effects of didanosine and zalcitabine (i.e. peripheral neuropathy and pancreatitis) should be taken into account when administering these drugs with other drugs with the same tolerability profile. Coadministration of zidovudine and ganciclovir should be avoided because of the high rate of haematological intolerance. In contrast, zidovudine and foscarnet have synergistic effect and no pharmacokinetic interaction has been detected. No major change in zidovudine pharmacokinetics was seen when the drug was combined with aciclovir, famciclovir or interferons. However, concomitant use of zidovudine and ribavirin is not advised. Although no pharmacokinetic interaction was documented when didanosine was first administered with intravenous ganciclovir, recent studies have shown that concentration of didanosine are increased by 50% or more when coadministered with intravenous or oral ganciclovir. The mechanism of this interaction has not been elucidated. Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction was demonstrated between foscarnet and didanosine or ganciclovir. Clinical trials have shown that zidovudine can be administered safely with paracetamol (acetaminophen), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, oxazepam or codeine. Inhibition of zidovudine glucuronidation has been demonstrated with fluconazole, atovaquone, valproic acid (valproate sodium), methadone, probenecid and inosine pranobex; however, the clinical consequences of this have not been fully investigated. No interaction has been demonstrated with didanosine per se but care should be taken of interaction with the high pH buffer included in the tablet formulation. Drugs that need an acidic pH for absorption (ketoconazole, itraconazole but not fluconazole, dapsone, pyrimethamine) or those that can be chelated by the ions of the buffer (quinolones and tetracyclines) should be administered 2 hours before or 6 hours after didanosine. Very few interaction studies have been undertaken with other antiviral drugs. Coadministration of zalcitabine with the antacid 'Maalox' results in a reduction of its absorption. Dapsone does not influence the disposition of zalcitabine. Cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) causes an increase in lamivudine concentrations by 43%. Saquinavir, delavirdine and atevirdine appeared to be metabolised by cytochrome P450 and interactions with enzyme inducers or inhibitors could be anticipated. Some studies showed that interferons can reduce drug metabolism but only a few studies have evaluated the pathways involved. Further studies are required to better understand the clinical consequences of drug interactions with antiviral drugs. Drug-drug interactions should be considered in addition to individual drug clinical benefits and safety profiles.

Antiviral efficacy in vivo of the anti-human immunodeficiency virus bicyclam SDZ SID 791 (JM 3100), an inhibitor of infectious cell entry.

SID 791, a bicyclam inhibiting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication in vitro by blocking virus entry into cells, is an effective inhibitor of virus production and of depletion of human CD4+ T cells in HIV type 1-infected SCID-hu Thy/Liv mice. Steady levels of 100 ng of SID 791 or higher per ml in plasma resulted in statistically significant inhibition of p24 antigen formation. Daily injections of SID 791 caused a dose-dependent decrease in viremia, and this inhibition could be potentiated by coadministration of zidovudine or didanose. The present study suggests that SID 791 alone or in combination with licensed antiviral agents may decrease the virus load in HIV-infected patients and, by extension, that the infectious cell entry step is a valid target for antiviral chemotherapy of HIV disease. The SCID-hu Thy/Liv model in effect provides a rapid means of assessing the potential of compounds with novel modes of antiviral action, as well as the potential of antiviral drug combinations.

Pharmacokinetics of Simultaneously Administered Zidovudine and Didanosine in HIV-Seropositive Male Patients

Our objective was to determine whether a pharmacokinetic interaction exists between zidovudine and didanosine when they are coadministered. This was designed as a randomized, three-period, three-treatment, six-sequence, crossover study with a 1-week washout period between treatments. The patients were six men infected with human immunodeficiency virus who were asymptomatic. On three separate occasions, patients received zidovudine alone (200 mg every 8 h) for 3 days, didanosine alone (200 mg every 12 h) for 3 days, or zidovudine and didanosine for 3 days. On the fourth day, each patient received the final dose of each regimen, and blood and urine were serially collected for 8 h. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed for zidovudine, its glucuronide metabolite (GZDV), and didanosine. Coadministration of zidovudine had no significant effect on didanosine pharmacokinetic parameters (< 12% difference between treatment means, p > 0.1). Coadministration of didanosine did not significantly alter zidovudine pharmacokinetic parameters but did cause statistically significant increases in the renal and apparent formation clearances of GZDV (18.5% and 30.5% difference between the treatment means, respectively, p < 0.025). Therapeutic doses of zidovudine did not alter didanosine pharmacokinetic parameters. Coadministration of didanosine did not affect zidovudine parameters but did cause small alterations in GZDV pharmacokinetic values. These changes are unlikely to be clinically significant.

Three-dimensional analysis of the synergistic cytotoxicity of ganciclovir and zidovudine

The combined cytotoxicity of zidovudine and ganciclovir in three cell lines of human origin was examined. The data were generated by a new rapid cell proliferation assay and a more sensitive plating efficiency assay. A three-dimensional analytical approach was used to evaluate the drug-drug interactions, and the results were compared with those obtained by two conventional methods of analysis. Synergistic cytotoxicity was observed in all cell lines examined and by both assays. Moreover, this synergistic cytotoxicity was statistically significant at physiologically relevant concentrations. It is not known whether these drug-drug interactions manifest themselves in vivo as granulocytopenia or other untoward side effects. These results, however, indicate that further investigation is warranted and that the coadministration of zidovudine and ganciclovir may be contraindicated.