CLSI Reference Broth Microdilution Research Articles

Evaluation of commercial, customized microdilution plates for Ureaplasma parvum, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Mycoplasma hominis antimicrobial susceptibility testing and determination of antimicrobial resistance prevalence in France.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of human urogenital mycoplasmas using the CLSI reference broth microdilution method is time-consuming and requires the laborious preparation of antimicrobial stock solutions. Here, we validated the use of reliable, convenient plates designed for antimicrobial susceptibility testing that allows the simultaneous determination of the MICs of eight antibiotics of interest. We then investigated the prevalence and mechanisms of resistance of each of these bacteria to tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides in France in 2020 and 2021. We showed that the prevalence of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin resistance has increased significantly in Ureaplasma spp. from 2010 to 2015 and requires ongoing monitoring.

A-274 Validation of Cefepime-Taniborbactam MIC Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test for MicroScan Dried Gram-Negative MIC Panels from a Multicenter Assessment of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract Background Cefepime-taniborbactam is an investigational agent with activity against carbapenem and multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.1 Given the need for accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing results to support patient care decisions, a multicenter study was conducted with Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates on investigational MicroScan Dried Gram-negative MIC (MSDGN) panels with cefepime-taniborbactam.2 Materials/Methods MSDGN panels were evaluated at three clinical sites by comparing MIC values obtained using MSDGN panels to MICs utilizing CLSI broth microdilution reference panels. The study included 490/491 Enterobacterales and 65 Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates tested using Prompt® and turbidity methods of inoculation during the combined efficacy and challenge phases. MSDGN panels were incubated at 35 ± 1°C and read on the WalkAway System, the autoSCAN-4 instrument, and visually at 16–20 h. Frozen reference panels were prepared according to CLSI/ISO methodology, incubated for 16–20 h and read visually. Results Essential agreement was calculated compared to MIC results from frozen reference panels for isolates tested in efficacy and challenge and found in the following table. Conclusion Cefepime-taniborbactam MIC results for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa obtained with the MSDGN panel correlate well with MICs obtained using frozen reference panels in this multicenter study.Pending approval by the US Food and Drug Administration; not available for in vitro diagnostic use in the US. Not for Distribution in the US.Pending submission and clearance by the US Food and Drug Administration; not yet available for in vitro diagnostic use in the US.For Investigational Use Only. Performance characteristics of this product have not been established.Read methodEnterobacterales Essential agreement (EA) % (n/N)Pseudomonas aeruginosaEssential agreement (EA) % (n/N)PromptTurbidityPromptTurbidityWalkAway90.0 (441/490)99.2 (487/491)100.0 (65/65)100.0 (65/65)autoSCAN-494.3 (462/490)99.0 (486/491)98.5 (64/65)98.5 (64/65)Visually92.7 (454/490)99.2 (487/491)100.0 (65/65)100.0 (65/65)Abbreviations: Prompt, Prompt inoculation method, Turbidity, Turbidity inoculation method.

430. Oritavancin Activity Against Gram-positive Pathogens Causing Bloodstream Infections in Hematology/Oncology and Transplant Units in US Medical Centers (2010-2019)

Abstract Background Patients undergoing hematologic, oncologic, and/or transplant treatment are at risk for infections. Appropriate antimicrobial management is crucial for patients with suspected or confirmed bloodstream infections (BSI). We evaluated the in vitro activity of oritavancin (ORI) and comparators against Gram-positive (GP) isolates causing BSI in patients from hematology/oncology and transplant units (HTU) in US medical centers. Methods 1,217 isolates (1/patient) were consecutively collected from HTU patients in 33 US hospitals during 2010-2019. Isolates were identified by MALDI-TOF and/or standard microbiological testing methods, and susceptibility (S) tested by CLSI reference broth microdilution in a central laboratory. CLSI breakpoints were applied. Results Enterococcus spp. (overall, 36.1%; E. faecium [EFM], 20.2%; E. faecalis [EF], 14.3%) and S. aureus (SA, 35.7%; 36.4% methicillin-resistant [MRSA]) were the most common organism groups, followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS; 11.8%; 76.4% MR), Viridans group streptococci (VHS; 9.6%), and beta-haemolytic streptococci (BHS; 3.5%). ORI inhibited 96.7%/98.9% of EFM/EF at ≤0.12mg/L (S breakpoint for vancomycin [VAN]-S EF). Ampicillin (100.0%S), linezolid (LZD; 100.0%S), daptomycin (DAP; 98.3%S), and VAN (97.1%S) were also active against EF. Only ORI (96.7%S) and LZD (100.0%S) remained active against EFM. A VRE phenotype and elevated daptomycin MIC (2-4 mg/L) were noted in 72.8% and 55.3% of EFM, with ORI inhibiting 95.5% and 95.6% of these isolates at ≤0.12mg/L, respectively. ORI displayed equivalent MIC50/90 (0.03/0.06 mg/L) values against MSSA (99.3%S) and MRSA (99.4%S). ORI inhibited 95.5% of MRCoNS at ≤0.12mg/L (SA breakpoint). VAN, DAP, and LZD remained active against MRSA and MRCoNS. ORI was also active against BHS (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.25 mg/L; 95.2%S) and VGS (MIC50/90, 0.015/0.25 mg/L; 96.6%S) as was VAN (100.0%), DAP (100.0%), and LZD (100.0%/99.1%S, respectively). Conclusion VRE EFM, MRCoNS, and MRSA rates were generally high in BSI GP isolates recovered from patients in HTU. ORI was highly active and inhibited > 95% of isolates at MIC of ≤ 0.12mg/L from this unique collection, including R subsets such as VAN-R EFM, EFM displaying elevated DAP MIC (2-4 mg/L), MRSA, and MRCoNS. Disclosures Cecilia G. Carvalhaes, MD, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Dee Shortridge, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|JMI Laboratory: Employee|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Menarini: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support Helio S. Sader, MD, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Rodrigo E. Mendes, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Office for Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support.

2036. Dual VIM-producing Proteus mirabilis, Including a Novel VIM-75, Among Elderly Patients in a Medical Center from Hungary: Report from the 2020 SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program

Abstract Background Nonsusceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to imipenem allows this pathogen evade surveillance for carbapenemases. Metallo-beta-lactamases of the VIM family are widespread among Enterobacterales in Europe. We identified an outbreak of P. mirabilis carrying 2 VIM enzymes among elderly patients from a medical center in Hungary. Methods A total of 16 P. mirabilis isolates were received from Hungary during 2020 as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Isolates were susceptibility tested by the CLSI reference broth microdilution method. Carbapenem-nonsusceptible isolates were submitted to whole genome sequencing, screened for resistance mechanisms, and evaluated for core genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST). Results Among the 16 P. mirabilis isolates from Hungary, 5 carbapenem-nonsusceptible, multidrug-resistant isolates (3 from urinary tract infections and 1 each from bloodstream infection and pneumonia) were identified from patients 66-92 years old. Four of these 5 isolates were listed as community acquired. All isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone (MIC, > 8 mg/L), cefepime (16- > 32), imipenem ( > 8), gentamicin ( > 16), levofloxacin (16- > 32), nitrofurantoin ( > 64), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole ( > 4), and plazomicin ( > 128), but susceptible to meropenem (0.25-0.5) and ertapenem (0.03-0.25). Isolates carried blaVIM-4 and blaVIM-75 on a class 1 integron within IS26 and separated by aac(6’)-IIc. IS26 was located on a compound plasmid carrying other resistance-encoding genes, including armA. The integron structure is identical to the blaVIM-4 and blaVIM-1-carrying integron described from a Vibrio cholerae isolated from a seagull in France in 2015 (KR262557). blaVIM-75 is a single amino acid variant (Q60R) of blaVIM-1. All isolates carried mutations in the QRDR (gyrA_S83I, parC_S84I). Based on cgMLST analysis, these 5 P. mirabilis isolates were highly similar, with only 7-19 SNPs detected. Conclusion The outbreak of multidrug-resistant P. mirabilis isolates carrying blaVIM-4 and blaVIM-75 in a Hungarian medical center is a cause of concern. Surveillance should be performed to understand the spread of and treatment options for infections caused by carbapenem-nonsusceptible P. mirabilis. Disclosures Lalitagauri M. Deshpande, PhD, Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Katalin Burián, MD, JMI Laboratories: Grant/Research Support Ilona Dóczi Csányi, MD, JMI Laboratories: Grant/Research Support Mariana Castanheira, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support.

1689. In Vitro Activity of Lefamulin Against Bacterial Pathogens Collected From Pneumonia Patients in United States and Latin America Medical Centers in 2020-2021

Abstract Background Lefamulin is a novel pleuromutilin protein synthesis inhibitor approved in the US, Canada, and Europe for the oral and intravenous treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in adults due to typical and atypical pathogens. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of lefamulin and comparators against bacterial isolates from patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections and hospitalized patients with pneumonia in the US and Latin America. Methods 1,907 unique isolates were collected within the SENTRY surveillance program from 29 medical centers in the US and 8 medical centers in Latin America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Panama). Isolates were susceptibility tested by CLSI reference broth microdilution methods. CLSI breakpoints (M100, 2022) were applied. Results Lefamulin inhibited 100% of S. pneumoniae isolates at or below its susceptible (S) breakpoint of ≤ 0.5 mg/L, regardless of resistance to other antibiotics used to treat CABP (MIC90 values of 0.12 or 0.25 mg/L, Table). The penicillin-resistant (R; 12.7%), azithromycin-R (43.7%), and tetracycline-R S. pneumoniae (20.4%) displayed reduced susceptibility to the other CABP drugs tested, except moxifloxacin ( > 98.2% S) and lefamulin (100% S). Lefamulin was highly potent against S. aureus, including MRSA, azithromycin-R, and moxifloxacin-R isolates, with 100% of isolates inhibited at or below the lefamulin S breakpoint of ≤ 0.25 mg/L. Susceptibility to azithromycin and moxifloxacin was particularly low for MRSA (13.9% and 25.0%, respectively). The fastidious Gram-negative H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis, of which 24.0% and 98.8%, respectively, were ß-lactamase positive, were S to lefamulin ( > 93%) and the other tested CABP drugs ( > 89%). Table. Susceptibility of pneumonia pathogens from US and Latin America to lefamulin and other CABP drugs Conclusion Lefamulin displayed potent in vitro activity against contemporary CABP pathogens from the US and Latin America. Its activity was unaffected by resistance to other antibiotic classes, including fluoroquinolones, macrolides, β-lactams, and tetracyclines. Lefamulin represents a valuable empiric treatment option for ambulatory and hospitalized patients with CABP, particularly when the causative pathogen is not identified or in settings with high prevalence of resistance. Disclosures Susanne Paukner, PhD, Nabriva Therapeutics: Inventor|Nabriva Therapeutics: Employee|Nabriva Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds SJ Ryan Arends, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support Rodrigo E. Mendes, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Office for Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support Steven P. Gelone, PharmD, Nabriva Therapeutics: Board Member|Nabriva Therapeutics: Inventor|Nabriva Therapeutics: Employee|Nabriva Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds|Nabriva Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Helio S. Sader, MD, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support.

520. Development of Cefepime-taniborbactam MIC Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on MicroScan Dried Gram-negative MIC Panels

Abstract Background Automated AST devices are critical to inform appropriate care of patients with bacterial infections. Cefepime-taniborbactam is an investigational agent under development to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Development of a cefepime-taniborbactam antimicrobial susceptibility test was completed for the MicroScan Dried Gram-negative MIC (MSDGN) Panel when compared to CLSI broth microdilution reference panels. Methods Development was conducted by comparing MICs obtained using the MSDGN panel to MICs using a CLSI broth microdilution reference panel. The concentration range of cefepime-taniborbactam evaluated was 0.12/4-64/4 µg/mL. A total of 1376 isolates (1256 Enterobacterales and 120 P. aeruginosa) were tested at 16, 18, and 20 hours incubation times (for visual read and autoSCAN-4). A total of 917 isolates (837 Enterobacterales and 80 P. aeruginosa) were tested at 16 and 18 hours incubation time for the WalkAway System. All isolates were tested using turbidity and Prompt® methods of inoculation. MSDGN panels were incubated at 35 ± 1°C. Reference panels, prepared according to ISO methodology, were inoculated using the turbidity inoculation method. All frozen reference panels were incubated at 35 ± 2°C and read visually. Rates of essential agreement (MicroScan MIC within ± 1 doubling dilution of reference MIC) were determined for each combination of inoculation method and read method. Results Essential agreement rates ranged from 93.0% to 98.8% for all isolates tested during development. Essential agreement rates for each inoculation and read method are presented in Table 1. Table 1- Results Conclusion Cefepime-taniborbactam MIC results obtained with the MSDGN panel correlated well with MIC results obtained using reference panels. Rates of essential agreement were ≥93.0% for all inoculation and read methods. These development data support the continued evaluation of MSDGN panel with cefepime-taniborbactam in a multicenter trial. Pending submission and clearance by the United States Food and Drug Administration; not yet available for in vitro diagnostic use in the US. For Investigational Use Only. The performance characteristics of this product have not been established. Disclosures Enrique J. Fernandez, BS, Beckman Coulter, Inc.: Employee of Beckman Coulter Robert L. Williams, PhD, Beckman Coulter, Inc.: Employee of Beckman Coulter Vasna Carr, BS, Beckman Coulter, Inc.: Employee of Beckman Coulter Vasna Carr, BS, Beckman Coulter, Inc.: Employee of Beckman Coulter Miller Renae, BS, Beckman Coulter, Inc.: Employee of Beckman Coulter.

Clinical, epidemiological, and mycological features of patients with candidemia: Experience in two tertiary referral centers in Iran.

Candidemia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy and those hospitalized with serious underlying diseases. Here, we investigated the epidemiological, clinical, and mycological features of candidemia in Tehran, Iran. A prospective observational study of all patients diagnosed with candidemia was performed at two referral teaching hospitals in Tehran, Iran, from February to December 2018. Demographic characteristics, underlying diseases, risk factors, clinical symptoms, and laboratory analyses of candidemic patients with positive culture were mined. Candida isolates were molecularly identified by sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2). The antifungal susceptibility testing for fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, amphotericin B, caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin against the isolates was performed using CLSI broth microdilution reference method (M27-A3). A total of 89 episodes were identified, with an incidence of 2.1 episodes/1000 admissions. The common underling disease were malignancy (46%), renal failure/dialysis (44%), and hypertension (40%). The overall crude mortality was 47%. C. albicans (44%) was the most frequent causative agent, followed by C. glabrata (21%), C. parapsilosis complex (15%), C. tropicalis (11%), and C. lusitaniae (3.5%). All the isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B. The activity of all four azoles was low against non-albicans Candida species, especially C. tropicalis. The increase in non-albicans Candida species with reduced susceptibility to antifungal drugs might be alarming in high-risk patients. Therefore, accurate knowledge of predisposing factors and epidemiological patterns in candidemia are effective steps for managing and decreasing the mortality rate in candidemia.

Activities of Eravacycline, Tedizolid, Norvancomycin, Nemonoxacin, Ceftaroline, and Comparators against 1,871 Staphylococcus and 1,068 Enterococcus Species Isolates from China: Updated Report of the CHINET Study 2019.

To evaluate the in vitro activities of eravacycline, tedizolid, nemonoxacin, norvancomycin, and ceftaroline against Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species isolates were collected as part of the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2019 to provide susceptibility data for Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. for their future development and application in clinical practice. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the CLSI broth microdilution reference method. Eravacycline was highly active against Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species isolates, proved by the MIC50/90: 0.06/0.125, 0.06/0.25, 0.06/0.25, 0.06/0.25, 0.125/0.5, 0.125/0.25, and 0.03/0.06 mg/L for Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), S. epidermidis, S. hominis, S. haemolyticus, Enterococcus faecalis, and E. faecium, respectively. S. aureus isolates tested were fully susceptible to tedizolid. Still, nonsusceptible isolates were found for E. faecalis (72/567 [12.7%]) and E. faecium (12/501 [2.4%]). Norvancomycin at 2 mg/L could inhibit 100% of Staphylococcus spp., while 1 mg/L of ceftaroline could inhibit 78.9% of MRSA and 99.9% of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates. Additionally, nemonoxacin was also active against Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species isolates tested (shown by the following MIC90s and ranges, in milligrams per liter: 2 and ≤0.015 to 8 for MRSA, 0.25 and ≤0.015 to 4 for MSSA, 0.5 and ≤0.015 to 8 for S. epidermidis, and 4 and ≤0.015 to >32 for E. faecalis). In conclusion, both eravacycline and tedizolid were highly active against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. recently collected across China. Nemonoxacin showed potent activity against Staphylococcus spp. and E. faecalis but limited activity against E. faecium. Norvancomycin and ceftaroline displayed highly potent activity against Staphylococcus spp. IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial resistance has become a severe threat to global public health. According to statistics, nearly 700,000 people die from bacterial infections worldwide (J. O'Neill, Antimicrobial Resistance: Tackling a Crisis for the Health and Wealth of Nations, 2014; C. Y. Chin, K. A. Tipton, M. Farokhyfar, E. M. Burd, et al., Nat Microbiol 3:563-569, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0151-5). The number of bacterial infections is expected to climb to 10 million by 2050, showing that bacterial resistance has become a significant problem that cannot be ignored. It is crucial to develop new antimicrobial agents to combat antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro activities of eravacycline, tedizolid, nemonoxacin, norvancomycin, and ceftaroline against Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus species isolates which were collected as part of CHINET in 2019. We believe that this study can provide susceptibility data for Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. for their future development and application in clinical practice.

P017 Echinocandin resistance mechanism in Candida tropicalis and Candida glabrata

Poster session 1, September 21, 2022, 12:30 PM - 1:30 PMObjective Candida tropicalis and Candida glabrata account for 41.6% and 7.08% of total Candidaemia cases in India. Echinocandins are the first-line treatment option for these infections. Resistance to Echinocandins is rare with Candida sp. However, in recent years, has been noted across many centers. We determined the mechanism of echinocandin resistance in C. tropicalis and C. glabrata.Methods C. tropicalis and C. glabrata isolated from Candidaemia patients over a period of 3 years (August 2016-July 2019), identified by MALDI-TOF-MS were used in this study. Antifungal susceptibility testing was done following CLSI broth microdilution reference method (M 27A). FKS1 gene was sequenced using species-specific primers for the presence of any mutation. To determine any changes in the cell wall chitin and glucan contents, expression fold changes of chitin synthase (CHS1, CHS2, and CHS3), and glucan synthase genes upon caspofungin treatment were determined using real-time qPCR. These findings were correlated with cell wall chitin and glucan content determined by flowcytometry.ResultsA total of 3558 Candida species were isolated from patients of all age groups at our hospital. C. tropicalis was the predominant agent (34%), while the prevalence of C. glabrata was 6%. A total of 17 (8.5%) C. glabrata and 3 (0.25%) C. tropicalis exhibited reduced susceptibility to echinocandins. All these isolates carried a wild-type FKS genes.In C. tropicalis, inducible expression of Chs1, Chs2 and Chs3 genes were comparable among susceptible and resistant isolates1.8 (0.4-2.8) vs. 2.5 (0.9-6.6), P = .247); [0.7 (0.3-1.8) vs. 0.7 (0.2-1.6), P = .793]; [1.3 (0.14-4.8) vs. 1.1(0.48-1.7), P = .522], respectively. In concordance with gene expression, there was no significant difference in cell wall chitin contents among resistant and susceptible [14.37 (6.5-24.8) vs 16.28 (6.0-24.7), P = .114] C. tropicalis isolates. In contrast in resistant isolates of C. glabrata, caspofungin treatment resulted in significantly higher induction of chitin synthase genes compared to susceptible isolates; Chs1 [2.34 (0.24-9.71) vs. 1.56 (0.55-4.5) (P = .007)], CHS2 [1.59 (0.33-8.0) vs. (2.3 (0.69-6.15), P = .0006], and CHS3 gene [3.8 (0.13-12.73) vs. 1.9 (0.56-7.16), P <.0001]. Flowcytometric data in terms of chitin content, correlated well with expression changes as staining index was significantly higher in resistant compared to susceptible isolates [320 (198-535) vs. 164 (5.34-254.10) P = .0001]. Glucan synthase expression was comparable in susceptible and resistant isolates of C. tropicalis [3.47 (1.57-7.63) vs. 4.41 (0.41-17.51), (P = .518)]. However, glucan synthase gene expression was found significantly increased in resistant C. glabrata isolates compared to susceptible isolates; 3.10 (1.02-16.45) vs. 1.61 (0.13-7.67), P <.001.ConclusionWe evaluated the role of cell wall components in echinocandin resistance in isolates with reduced susceptibility to echinocandins but lacking an FKS1 mutation. While chitin was induced at higher levels in C. glabrata, a similar finding was not observed in C. tropicalis. This warrants further studies to elucidate the role of fungal cell wall polymers in resistance.

Evaluation of the Post-Antifungal Effect of Rezafungin and Micafungin against Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis and Candida glabrata.

Rezafungin, a new echinocandin with an extended half-life, exhibits potent activity against Candida spp. Aside from the MIC, specific interactions between antifungal and isolate, including the duration of anti-infective activity, may impact dose interval choices and infection outcome. We evaluated rezafungin and micafungin post-antifungal effect (PAFE) against C.albicans, C.parapsilosis and C.glabrata. Six Candida spp. isolates were tested, including two of each species, C.albicans, C.parapsilosis and C.glabrata. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed using the CLSI reference broth microdilution method. Antifungal concentrations of 1x, 4x and 16x the baseline MIC were used for PAFE determinations. Colony counts were performed at T0 (pre-exposure), after the 1-h drug exposure, after the cell wash (T1), and at T2, T4, T8, T12, T24 and T48h. Rezafungin PAFE results were equivalent to micafungin PAFE values for one C.albicans (>14.9h) and both C.glabrata (>40 h) isolates for all concentrations tested. The rezafungin and micafungin PAFEs could not be determined against one C.albicans isolate. Prolonged PAFE results were also noted for rezafungin (range, 18.4 to >40 h) against both C.parapsilosis isolates at all concentrations, while no micafungin PAFE or a short PAFE (range, 1.8 to 7.4h) was observed against these organisms, except at 16x bMIC. Rezafungin showed sustained growth inhibition following drug removal and displayed equivalent or longer PAFE values than micafungin against all tested Candida spp.

Prevalence of ESBL non-CRE Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae among clinical isolates collected by the SMART global surveillance programme from 2015 to 2019

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) non-carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (non-CRE) phenotype among clinical Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates collected in 2018–2019 for the SMART global surveillance programme and review trends in prevalence over 5 years (2015–2019). MICs were determined by CLSI reference broth microdilution. ESBL non-CRE phenotypes were defined as non-susceptible to ceftriaxone (MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL) and susceptible to ertapenem (MIC ≤ 0.5 μg/mL). In 2018–2019, ESBL non-CRE phenotypes among E. coli were more common in respiratory tract infection isolates than other infection sources across all global regions; for K. pneumoniae there was wide variation by geographic region in the specimen source most frequently associated with this phenotype. In most regions, ESBL non-CRE phenotype isolates were found more frequently in samples from ICU patients than non-ICU patients and from patients with hospital length of stay at time of specimen collection ≥48 h versus <48 h. ESBL non-CRE phenotypes exceeded 50% of isolates for E. coli from India, Thailand, Vietnam, China, Russia, Mexico, Kenya and Kuwait and for K. pneumoniae from Lithuania and Kuwait. ESBL non-CRE phenotype E. coli increased significantly (P < 0.05) in Asia (excluding China), Australia/New Zealand and Latin America from 2015–2019, while ESBL non-CRE phenotype K. pneumoniae increased significantly in Latin America, USA and Canada. There was marked variability in ESBL rates across countries, over time, and by sample source and ward type. Trending data from 2015–2019 showed ESBL rates are increasing in many regions worldwide.

1036. In Vitro Analysis of AmpC β-lactamase Induction by Tebipenem in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

1036. <i>In Vitro</i> Analysis of AmpC β-lactamase Induction by Tebipenem in <i>Enterobacterales</i> and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>

1079. Development of Tebipenem MIC Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test for Gram-negative Bacteria on MicroScan Dried Gram-negative MIC Panels

Abstract Background Development of a tebipenem antimicrobial susceptibility test was completed for the MicroScan Dried Gram-negative MIC (MSDGN) Panel when compared to CLSI broth microdilution reference panels. Methods Development was conducted by comparing MICs obtained using the MSDGN panel to MICs using a CLSI broth microdilution reference panel. A total of 669 Enterobacterales isolates were tested at 16, 18, and 20 hour incubation times using the turbidity and Prompt®* methods of inoculation. MSDGN panels were incubated at 35 ± 2ºC and read on the WalkAway System, the autoSCAN-4 instrument, and read visually. Frozen reference panels, prepared according to ISO/CLSI methodology, were inoculated using the turbidity inoculation method. All frozen reference panels were incubated at 35 ± 2ºC and read visually. Dilution sequence evaluated is 0.03-32 µg/mL. Results When compared to frozen reference panel results, essential agreement for all isolates tested during development are as follows: Conclusion The development data showed that tebipenem MIC results for Enterobacterales obtained with the MSDGN panel correlate well with MICs obtained using frozen reference panels. Essential agreement is &amp;gt; 90% for all inoculation and read methods. For Investigational Use Only. The performance characteristics of this product have not been established. * Prompt® is a registered trademark of 3M Company, St. Paul, MN USA. © 2021 Beckman Coulter. All rights reserved. Beckman Coulter, the stylized logo, and the Beckman Coulter product and service marks mentioned herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Beckman Coulter, Inc. in the United States and other countries. Disclosures Jose Enrique Fernandez, n/a, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Vasna Carr, n/a, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Renae Miller, n/a, Beckman Coulter (Employee)

In vitro activity of posaconazole and comparators versus opportunistic filamentous fungal pathogens globally collected during 8 years

The epidemiology of invasive filamentous fungal diseases requires monitoring due to changes in susceptibility patterns of new and established antifungal agents that may affect clinical practices. We evaluated the activity of posaconazole against 2,157 invasive moulds collected worldwide from 2010−2017. The isolates included 1,775 Aspergillus spp. and 382 non-Aspergillus moulds, including 81 Fusarium spp., 62 Mucorales group, and 57 Scedosporium spp. Isolates were tested using the CLSI reference broth microdilution method. Posaconazole showed similar activity to itraconazole and voriconazole against A. fumigatus. Applying published ECV, 98.0% of the A. fumigatus and 97.7% to 100.0% of other common Aspergillus species were wildtype to posaconazole. Categorical agreement between posaconazole and the other azoles tested against A. fumigatus was 98.7%. Notably, most of the Aspergillus spp. isolates recovered from this large collection were wildtype to echinocandins and all azoles. Posaconazole non-wildtype rates of A. fumigatus varied across the different geographic regions, with 2.1% in Europe, 2.2% in North America, 1.8% in Latin America, and 0.7% in the Asia-Pacific region. The frequency of azole non-wildtype A. fumigatus isolates from Europe increased steadily from 2010−2017 for all 3 triazoles (0.0%−5.0%). The azole non-wildtype A. fumigatus rates from the other geographic areas were stable over time. Fusarium and/or Scedosporium spp. isolates were highly resistant to azoles and echinocandins. Posaconazole and amphotericin B were the most active agents against the Mucorales. Posaconazole was very active against most species of Aspergillus and was comparable to itraconazole and voriconazole against the less common moulds. Posaconazole should provide a useful addition to the anti-mould grouping of antifungal agents.

Isavuconazole nonwildtype Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from a global surveillance study display alterations in multiple genes involved in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway not previously associated with resistance to other azoles.

We evaluated 35 azole nonwildtype Aspergillus fumigatus isolates that were collected during 2017-2018 using whole genome sequencing (WGS) to detect alterations in the genes involved in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway as well as other genes associated with azole resistance. Among 297 A fumigatus isolates collected worldwide, 36 isolates displayed nonwildtype MIC values to isavuconazole, itraconazole, or voriconazole when tested by the CLSI reference broth microdilution method. Isolates were submitted to WGS and results were compared to 2 azolewildtype isolates. Among the 35 sequenced isolates (1 failed to produce quality sequences), 29 were nonwildtype to isavuconazole, 16 were nonwildtype to itraconazole, and 9 were nonwildtype to voriconazole (CLSI M59Ed2 criteria). A total of 9 isolates carried Cyp51A TR34/L98H alterations (8 from Italy and 1 from Belgium) and had nonwildtype MIC values for ≥2 azoles. A Cyp51B Q42L mutation was detected in 3 isolates, 1 nonwildtype voriconazole and 2 nonwildtype isavuconazole isolates. Three isolates harboured multiple mutations in Cyp51A (F46Y, M172V, E427K ± N248T, and D255E), including 1 isolate with the Cyp51B Q42L mutation. Mutations causing frameshifts, early termination, and duplications were observed among several genes and were more prevalent in isavuconazole nonwildtype isolates (66.7%) than in the isolates that were nonwildtype to 1 or 2 other azoles (22.2%). Nine isolates harboured frameshift mutations in a ERG25 homologue that is usually associated with changes in other genes and should be further evaluated. Cyp51A L98H/TR34 was the most common alteration observed among the azole nonwildtype A fumigatus isolates from a large surveillance study; however, only isolates that were nonwildtype to isavuconazole had alterations in multiple analysed genes. These isolates deserve further evaluation.

Antimicrobial activity of manogepix, a first-in-class antifungal, and comparator agents tested against contemporary invasive fungal isolates from an international surveillance programme (2018–2019)

Manogepix, the active moiety of the prodrug fosmanogepix, is a novel antifungal with activity against major fungal pathogens including Candida (except Candida krusei), Aspergillus and difficult-to-treat/rare moulds. We tested manogepix and comparators against 2669 contemporary (2018-2019) fungal isolates collected from 82 medical centres in North America (42.3%), Europe (37.9%), Asia-Pacific (12.3%) and Latin America (7.6%). Of these, 70.7% were Candida spp., 3.6% were non-Candida yeasts including 49 Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii, 21.7% were Aspergillus spp. and 4.1% were other moulds. Isolates were tested for antifungal susceptibility by the CLSI reference broth microdilution method. Manogepix (MIC50/90, 0.008/0.06 mg/L) was the most active agent tested against Candida spp. isolates; corresponding anidulafungin, micafungin and fluconazole MIC90 values were 16- to 64-fold higher. Similarly, manogepix (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 mg/L) was ≥4-fold more active than anidulafungin, micafungin and fluconazole against C. neoformans var. grubii. Against Aspergillus spp., manogepix (MEC50/90, 0.015/0.03 mg/L) had comparable activity to anidulafungin and micafungin. Low manogepix concentrations inhibited uncommon species of Candida, non-Candida yeasts, and rare moulds including Scedosporium spp. and Lomentospora (Scedosporium) prolificans. Manogepix exhibited potent activity against contemporary fungal isolates, including echinocandin- and azole-resistant strains of Candida and Aspergillus spp., respectively. Although rare, Candida strains that were non-wild type for manogepix demonstrated resistance to fluconazole. However, the clinical relevance of this finding is unknown. The extended spectrum of manogepix is noteworthy for its activity against many less-common yet antifungal-resistant strains. Clinical studies are underway to evaluate the utility of fosmanogepix against difficult-to-treat resistant fungal infections.

Comparative activity of posaconazole and systemic azole agents against clinical isolates of filamentous fungi from a global surveillance programme.

ObjectivesThe activity of mould-active azoles was evaluated against 397 filamentous fungi causing invasive mould infections (IMI) worldwide. In addition, a tentative posaconazole epidemiological cut-off value (ECV) against Aspergillus fumigatus was investigated.MethodsIsolates were susceptibility tested by the CLSI reference broth microdilution methods. Species identification was confirmed by MALDI-TOF and/or sequencing analysis.ResultsAspergillus spp. (81.9%) remained the most common organism causing IMI worldwide; approximately two-thirds of Aspergillus spp. recovered were A. fumigatus. In general, more than 90% of 220 A. fumigatus isolates were wild type (WT) to all mould-active azoles, except itraconazole (84.5% WT). The voriconazole non-susceptible (NS) A. fumigatus rate was 7.7% overall and was higher in Europe (12.9%) than in the other regions (0%–5.8%). Posaconazole (MIC50/MIC90, 0.25/0.5 mg/L) showed similar or slightly higher activity than voriconazole (MIC50/MIC90, 0.5/0.5 mg/L) and isavuconazole (MIC50/MIC90, 0.5/1 mg/L) against A. fumigatus. The mould-active azoles displayed similar activity against non-fumigatus Aspergillus (WT rates >93%), but differences were observed among the main species/sections. Posaconazole, voriconazole, and isavuconazole inhibited at their respective ECVs 100%, 97.0%, and 100% of A. section Nigri; 100%, 100%, and 93.8% of A. section Terrei; and 97.3%, 100%, and 100% of A. section Flavi isolates. Posaconazole displayed potency greater than or equal to the other azoles against the Mucorales group and Scedosporium spp.ConclusionsPosaconazole and other mould-active azoles showed good activity against Aspergillus spp. causing IMI, but clinicians should be aware of regional rates of voriconazole-NS A. fumigatus.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against Gram-negative isolates from patients with lower respiratory tract infections \u2013 SMART United States 2018\u20132019

BackgroundCeftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is approved in 70 countries, including the United States, for the treatment of patients with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia caused by susceptible Gram-negative pathogens. C/T is of particular importance as an agent for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. The current study summarizes 2018–2019 data from the United States on lower respiratory tract isolates of Gram-negative bacilli from the SMART global surveillance program. The CLSI reference broth microdilution method was used to determine in vitro susceptibility of C/T and comparators against isolates of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales.ResultsC/T inhibited 96.0% of P. aeruginosa (n = 1237) at its susceptible MIC breakpoint (≤4 μg/ml), including > 85% of meropenem-nonsusceptible and piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T)-nonsusceptible isolates and 76.2% of MDR isolates. Comparator agents demonstrated lower activity than C/T against P. aeruginosa: meropenem (74.8% susceptible), cefepime (79.2%), ceftazidime (78.5%), P/T (74.4%), and levofloxacin (63.1%). C/T was equally active against ICU (96.0% susceptible) and non-ICU (96.7%) isolates of P. aeruginosa. C/T inhibited 91.8% of Enterobacterales (n = 1938) at its susceptible MIC breakpoint (≤2 μg/ml); 89.5% of isolates were susceptible to cefepime and 88.0% susceptible to P/T. 67.1 and 86.5% of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) screen-positive isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 85) and Escherichia coli (n = 74) and 49.6% of MDR Enterobacterales were susceptible to C/T. C/T was equally active against ICU (91.3% susceptible) and non-ICU (92.6%) Enterobacterales isolates.ConclusionData from the current study support the use of C/T as an important treatment option for lower respiratory tract infections including those caused by MDR P. aeruginosa.

1547. Activity of Tedizolid and Comparator Agents against Gram-Positive Bacterial Isolates Causing Skin and Skin Structure Infections in Pediatric Patients during 2015-2019 in the US

BackgroundNew strategies to treat acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) are needed due to the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a common multidrug resistant pathogen of ABSSSIs. Tedizolid (TZD) was approved by the US FDA for treating ABSSSI in adults and is under evaluation for treating pediatric patients. Accordingly, the activity of TZD and comparators was evaluated against clinical surveillance isolates collected from pediatric patients with SSSI in the US.MethodsA total of 2,758 Gram-positive isolates were collected from pediatric patients with SSSIs in 33 sites in the US between 2015 and 2019 as part of the Surveillance of Tedizolid Activity and Resistance (STAR) Program. Bacterial identification was confirmed by MALDI-TOF MS and susceptibility (S) testing performed by the CLSI reference broth microdilution method. Current CLSI interpretative criteria was applied.Results S. aureus (SA; n=2,163; 78.4%) was the most frequent pathogen recovered from all age groups (≤ 1y; 2-5y; 6-12y; 13-17y), followed by β-hemolytic streptococci (BHS; n=460; 16.7%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; n=70; 2.5%). TZD was active against all SA (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/L; 100% S). Equivalent TZD MIC50/90 values (0.12/0.25 mg/L) were observed against MRSA (n=886; 41.0%; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/L) and methicillin susceptible (MSSA; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/L) isolates, regardless the age group. TZD also was very active against BHS (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/L; 100% S, regardless of species). TZD, linezolid, and daptomycin had 100.0% S rates against the main Gram-positive species and organism groups (Figure). Ceftaroline and clindamycin showed S rates of >90% against MRSA, MSSA, S. pyogenes and S. dysgalactiae. Lower S rates were observed for clindamycin against VGS (88.2%) and S. agalactiae (64.1%). TZD was the most potent agent (MIC90, 0.25 mg/L) against Enterococcus faecalis (n=30, 1.1%), and a vancomycin-resistance phenotype was observed in 1 (3.3%) isolate.ConclusionTZD was highly active against Gram-positive clinical isolates responsible for SSSI in pediatric patients across US hospitals from a 5-year period. TZD was equipotent or more potent than comparators against MSSA and MRSA isolates.Table 1 DisclosuresCecilia G. Carvalhaes, MD, PhD, A. Menarini Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite S.R.L. (Research Grant or Support)Allergan (Research Grant or Support)Cidara Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support)Cipla Ltd. (Research Grant or Support)Fox Chase Chemical Diversity Center (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Merck & Co, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Pfizer (Research Grant or Support) Helio S. Sader, MD, PhD, A. Menarini Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite S.R.L. (Research Grant or Support)Allergan (Research Grant or Support)Allergan (Research Grant or Support)Allergan (Research Grant or Support)Cipla Ltd. (Research Grant or Support)Cipla Ltd. (Research Grant or Support)Melinta (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Paratek Pharma, LLC (Research Grant or Support)Pfizer (Research Grant or Support) Paul R. Rhomberg, n/a, Cidara Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support)Fox Chase Chemical Diversity Center (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support) Mariana Castanheira, PhD, 1928 Diagnostics (Research Grant or Support)A. Menarini Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite S.R.L. (Research Grant or Support)Allergan (Research Grant or Support)Allergan (Research Grant or Support)Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Research Grant or Support)Cidara Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support)Cidara Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support)Cipla Ltd. (Research Grant or Support)Cipla Ltd. (Research Grant or Support)Fox Chase Chemical Diversity Center (Research Grant or Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Merck & Co, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Merck & Co, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Paratek Pharma, LLC (Research Grant or Support)Pfizer (Research Grant or Support)Qpex Biopharma (Research Grant or Support) Rodrigo E. Mendes, PhD, A. Menarini Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite S.R.L. (Research Grant or Support)Allergan (Research Grant or Support)Allergan (Research Grant or Support)Basilea Pharmaceutica International, Ltd (Research Grant or Support)Cipla Ltd. (Research Grant or Support)Department of Health and Human Services (Research Grant or Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Pfizer (Research Grant or Support)

673. Updated CLSI Ciprofloxacin Breakpoints from a Multicenter Assessment for Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using MicroScan Dried Gram Negative MIC Panels

BackgroundUpdated US FDA/CLSI ciprofloxacin breakpoints were evaluated against data from a multicenter clinical study with Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and P. aeruginosa on a MicroScan Dried Gram-negative MIC (MSDGN) Panel. MIC results were compared to results obtained with frozen broth microdilution panels prepared according to CLSI methodology.MethodsMSDGN panels were evaluated at three clinical sites by comparing MIC values obtained using the MSDGN panels to MICs utilizing a CLSI broth microdilution reference panel. Data from the combined phases of efficacy and challenge included 803 Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and P. aeruginosa clinical isolates tested using the turbidity and Prompt® methods of inoculation. To demonstrate reproducibility, a subset of 12 organisms were tested on MSDGN panels at each site during reproducibility. MSDGN panels were incubated at 35 ± 1ºC and read on the WalkAway System, the autoSCAN-4 instrument, and visually. Read times for the MSDGN panels were at 16-20 hours. Frozen reference panels were prepared and read according to CLSI methodology. FDA and CLSI breakpoints (µg/mL) used for interpretation of MIC results were: Enterobacterales ≤ 0.25 S, 0.5 I, ≥ 1 R; Salmonella spp. ≤ 0.06 S, 0.12-0.5 I, ≥ 1 R; P. aeruginosa ≤ 0.5 S, 1 I, ≥ 2 R.ResultsEssential and categorical agreement was calculated compared to frozen reference panel results. Results for isolates tested during efficacy and challenge with Prompt inoculation and manual read are as follows: Read Method Essential Agreement (EA) % Categorical Agreement (CA) % Very Major Error (VMJ) % Major Error (MAJ) % Enterobacterales 93.8(646/689)97.7(673/689)0.0(0/146)0.0(0/535) Salmonella spp. 100(21/21)95.2(20/21)0.0(0/1)0.0(0/18) P. aeruginosa 94.6(88/93)91.4(85/93)0.0(0/29)1.7(1/58)ConclusionCiprofloxacin MIC results for Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp., and P. aeruginosa obtained with the MSDGN panel correlate well with MICs obtained using frozen reference panels using updated FDA/CLSI interpretive criteria in this multicenter study.* PROMPT® is a registered trademark of 3M Company, St. Paul, MN USA.BEC, the stylized logo and the BEC product and service marks mentioned herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Beckman Coulter, Inc. in the US and other countries.Disclosures Maria M. Traczewski, BS MT (ASCP), Beckman Coulter (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Denise Beasley, BS, Beckman Coulter (Other Financial or Material Support, Research personnel) Amanda Harrington, PhD, Beckman Coulter (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Sharon DesJarlais, BS, Beckman Coulter (Other Financial or Material Support, Research personnel) Omai Garner, PhD, D(ABMM), Beckman Coulter (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Christine Hastey, PhD, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Regina Brookman, BS, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Zabrina Lockett, MS, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Jennifer Chau, PhD, Beckman Coulter (Employee)