Treatment Of Clostridioides Difficile Infection Research Articles

The clinical effectiveness of Fidaxomicin compared to Vancomycin in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection, a single center real-world experience.

The use of fidaxomicin is recommended as first line therapy for all patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). However, real-world studies have shown conflicting evidence of superiority. We conducted a retrospective single center study of patients diagnosed with CDI between 2011-2021. A primary composite outcome of clinical failure, 30-day relapse or CDI-related death was used. A multivariable cause specific Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate fidaxomicin compared to vancomycin in preventing the composite outcome. A separate model was fit on a subset of patients with C. difficile ribotypes adjusting for ribotype. There were 598 patients included, of whom 84 received fidaxomicin. The primary outcome occurred in 8 (9.5%) in the fidaxomicin group compared to 111 (21.6%) in the vancomycin group. The adjusted multivariable model showed fidaxomicin was associated with 63% reduction in the risk of the composite outcome compared to vancomycin (HR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.80). In the 337 patients with ribotype data after adjusting for ribotype 027, the results showing superiority of fidaxomicin were maintained (HR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.77). In the treatment of CDI, we showed that real-world use of fidaxomicin is associated with lower risk of a composite endpoint of treatment failure.

A retrospective budget impact analysis of fidaxomicin treatment for Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) in Germany

ABSTRACT Background Clostridioides difficile is the most common cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea. Research suggests that treating C. difficile infections (CDI) with fidaxomicin (FDX) is more effective than vancomycin (VAN), with potential cost savings. The objective was to calculate the budget impact of FDX treatment compared to VAN from a German payer perspective. Research design and methods The analysis used real-world data of patients discharged from University Hospital Cologne between Jan-01–2018 and Dec-31–2019. We identified recurrent and non-recurrent CDI cases and calculated direct treatment costs based on G-DRG flat rates. To calculate average costs per treatment and the budget impact, recurrence probabilities for VAN and FDX were taken from published evidence (28-day and 90-day scenarios). Results Totally, 475 cases were analyzed, thereof 421 non-recurrent, causing mean costs of €32,901 per case (95% CI: 27.752–38.050). Thirty-two patients experienced a recurrence within 28 days, yielding mean costs of €10,952 (95% CI: 5.627–16.277) for their additional hospital stay. The resulting budget impact was €1,303 (95% CI: 670–1.937) in favor of FDX, ranging from €148.34 to €2,190.30 in scenario analyses. Conclusion The analysis indicates FDX treatment can lead to cost savings compared to VAN. Future research should focus on specific patient groups, such as refractory CDI patients.

Comparison of fidaxomicin, thuricin CD, vancomycin and nisin highlights the narrow spectrum nature of thuricin CD

ABSTRACT Vancomycin and metronidazole are commonly used treatments for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). However, these antibiotics have been associated with high levels of relapse in patients. Fidaxomicin is a new treatment for CDI that is described as a narrow spectrum antibiotic that is minimally active on the commensal bacteria of the gut microbiome. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of fidaxomicin on the human gut microbiome with a number of narrow (thuricin CD) and broad spectrum (vancomycin and nisin) antimicrobials. The spectrum of activity of each antimicrobial was tested against 47 bacterial strains by well-diffusion assay. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were calculated against a select number of these strains. Further, a pooled fecal slurry of 6 donors was prepared and incubated for 24 h with 100 µM of each antimicrobial in a mini-fermentation system together with a no-treatment control. Fidaxomicin, vancomycin, and nisin were active against most gram positive bacteria tested in vitro, although fidaxomicin and vancomycin produced larger zones of inhibition compared to nisin. In contrast, the antimicrobial activity of thuricin CD was specific to C. difficile and some Bacillus spp. The MICs showed similar results. Thuricin CD exhibited low MICs (<3.1 µg/mL) for C. difficile and Bacillus firmus, whereas fidaxomicin, vancomycin, and nisin demonstrated lower MICs for all other strains tested when compared to thuricin CD. The narrow spectrum of thuricin CD was also observed in the gut model system. We conclude that the spectrum of activity of fidaxomicin is comparable to that of the broad-spectrum antibiotic vancomycin in vitro and the broad spectrum bacteriocin nisin in a complex community.

Is shorter also better in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection?

To assess the effectiveness of shortened regimens of vancomycin or fidaxomicin in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Adult patients with CDI hospitalized from January 2022 to May 2023 were included in this observational study. In patients with CDI treated with vancomycin or fidaxomicin, antibiotic treatment was discontinued after either 5 or 7 days of vancomycin or 5 days of fidaxomicin if there was a clinical response and improvement in laboratory parameters. The control cohort was treated with the standard 10 day regimen of either vancomycin or fidaxomicin. The follow-up was 60 days. Causative C. difficile strains were characterized by ribotyping and toxin gene detection when available. Twenty-five patients (median age 76 years) received shortened treatment with vancomycin (n = 21), or fidaxomicin (n = 4). Five cases fulfilled the criteria for severe CDI. Twenty-three patients completed follow-up; two died from causes other than CDI, and two developed recurrent CDI (8.0%). Ribotypes (RTs) 001 and 014 were the most prevalent with 20% each. In two C. difficile isolates, binary toxin genes were detected (RTs 078 and 023). In the control group of 22 patients recurrent CDI developed in 5 patients (22.7%). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups. Shortened treatment regimens for CDI with vancomycin and fidaxomicin were shown to be effective in our cohort of patients compared with 10 days of treatment. The recurrence rate was lower in the study group. A larger, prospective, double-blind, randomized, multicentre study is needed to support our findings.

Genetic determinants of resistance to antimicrobial therapeutics are rare in publicly available Clostridioides difficile genome sequences.

To determine the frequencies and clonal distributions of putative genetic determinants of resistance to antimicrobials applied for treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), as documented in the genomic record. We scanned 26 557 C. difficile genome sequences publicly available from the EnteroBase platform for plasmids, point mutations and gene truncations previously reported to reduce susceptibility to vancomycin, fidaxomicin or metronidazole, respectively. We measured the antimicrobial susceptibility of 143 selected C. difficile isolates. The frequency of mutations causing reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and metronidazole, respectively, increased strongly after 2000, peaking at up to 52% of all sequenced C. difficile genomes. However, both mutations declined sharply more recently, reflecting major changes in CDI epidemiology. We detected mutations associated with fidaxomicin resistance in several major genotypes, but found no evidence of international spread of resistant clones. The pCD-METRO plasmid, conferring metronidazole resistance, was detected in a single previously unreported C. difficile isolate, recovered from a hospital patient in Germany in 2008. The pX18-498 plasmid, putatively associated with decreased vancomycin susceptibility, was confined to related, recent isolates from the USA. Phenotype measurements confirmed that most of those genetic features were useful predictors of antibiotic susceptibility, even though ranges of MICs typically overlapped among isolates with and without specific mutations. Genomic data suggested that resistance to therapeutic antimicrobial drugs is rare in C. difficile. Public antimicrobial resistance marker databases were not equipped to detect most of the genetic determinants relevant to antibiotic therapy of CDI.

Incidence of Colorectal Cancer After Intestinal Infection Due to Clostridioides difficile.

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile or C. diff) is a toxin-producing bacteria that is notorious for causing life-threatening diarrhea. Recent literature has investigated various effects of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in cancer patients, but research into the impact of CDI on the development of cancer and its effects on the microbiome is limited. CDI predominately affects the colon, which urges consideration into the sequalae of infection. This study investigated the correlation between CDI and the incidence of colorectal carcinoma (CRC). A retrospective study (2010 - 2020) was conducted using a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant national database. The International Classification of Disease ninth and 10th Codes (ICD-9, ICD-10), Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), and National Drug Codes were used to identify CRC diagnosis, CDI, and matching or control parameters. Patients were matched for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), region of residence, and CDI treatment. An additional, but separate, query was executed to include obese patients with and without CDI, who were similarly matched and assessed for CRC. Statistical analyses were implemented to assess significance and estimate odds ratios (ORs). CDI was associated with a decreased incidence of CRC (OR = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55 - 0.63), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 2.2 × 10-16). CDI treatment, including appropriate antibiotics and fecal microbiota transplant (FMT), was controlled for in both infected and noninfected populations. Patients with a prior CDI who received relevant treatment were compared to patients with no history of CDI and received analogous treatment. Both populations subsequently developed CRC. Results remained statistically significant (P < 2.2 × 10-16) with a relative risk (RR) of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.54 - 0.60). Obesity was explored as a controlled variable in relation to CRC development in patients with and without prior CDI. Obese patients without a history of CDI were found to have a decreased risk of developing CRC. Results were statistically significant (P < 4.3 × 10-13) with an OR of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.63 - 0.77). This study shows a statistically significant correlation between CDI and decreased incidence of CRC. Additionally, there is a statistically significant correlation between obese patients with CDI and an increased incidence of CRC. Further research is needed to explore the mechanism of this striking relationship and the implications of CDIs on the microbiome.

Case Series: Efficacy of Polyclonal Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Refractory Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) no longer features in treatment guidelines. However, IVIg is still used by some clinicians for severe or recurrent CDI (rCDI) cases. The main objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of IVIg and to identify possible predictors of disease resolution post IVIg administration for patients with CDI. This retrospective observational cohort study of patients ≥2 years old hospitalised with severe, relapsing, or rCDI treated with IVIg therapy was performed in a large UK tertiary hospital between April 2018 and March 2023. Scanned electronic notes from patient admissions and clinical reporting systems were used to collect relevant data. In total, 20/978 patients diagnosed with CDI over the 5-year study were treated with IVIg. Twelve (60%) had hospital-onset CDI. Eleven of the twenty patients (55%) responded to treatment, with a mean of 8.6 (SD 10.7) days to disease resolution. Sixteen (80%) patients were treated for severe CDI and four (20%) for rCDI (n = 3) and relapsing CDI (n = 1). There were no statistically significant differences in possible independent predictors of disease resolution post IVIg administration between groups. There was an average of 6.2 (4.9) days to IVIg administration after diagnosis with no difference between responders and non-responders (p = 0.88) and no further significant difference in additional indicators. Four (36%) of the responders were immunosuppressed compared to just one (11%) of the non-responders (p = 0.15). Six of the responders (two with recurrent and four with severe CDI) improved rapidly within 2 days, and three of these were immunosuppressed. We observed disease resolution post IVIg therapy in over 50% of patients with refractory CDI. Our data also support a potential enhanced effect of IVIg in immunosuppressed individuals. Thus, the role of IVIg for CDI treatment, particularly in the immunosuppressed, warrants future case-control studies coupled to mechanistic investigations to improve care for this ongoing significant healthcare-associated infection.

Assessment of Faecal Microbiota Transplant Stability in Deep-Freeze Conditions: A 12-Month ExVivo Viability Analysis.

Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an established treatment for Clostridioides difficile infection and is under investigation for other conditions. The availability of suitable donors and the logistics of fresh stool preparation present challenges, making frozen, biobanked stools an attractive alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term viability of bacterial populations in faecal samples stored at -80°C for up to 12 months, supporting the feasibility of using frozen grafts for FMT. Fifteen faecal samples from nine healthy donors were processed, mixed with cryoprotectants and stored at -80°C. Samples were assessed at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months using quantitative culturing methods to determine the concentration of live bacteria. Quantitative analysis showed no significant decrease in bacterial viability over the 12-month period for both aerobic and anaerobic cultures (p = 0.09). At all timepoints, the coefficients of variability in colony-forming unit (CFU) counts were greater between samples (102 ± 21% and 100 ± 13% for aerobic and anaerobic cultures, respectively) than the variability between measurements of the same sample (30 ± 22% and 30 ± 19%). The study confirmed that faecal microbiota can be preserved with high viability in deep-freeze storage for up to a year, making allogenic FMT from biobanked samples a viable and safer option for patients. However, a multidonor approach may be beneficial to mitigate the risk of viability loss in any single donor sample.

Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridioides dif f icile infection: guidelines and status of practice in Korea

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a common healthcare-associated infection that is expected to increase with the increases in the elderly population, immunocompromised patients treated with chemotherapy and immunosuppressive drugs, antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, and invasive medical technologies. Accurate diagnosis is critical for proper treatment and management of CDI. Clinical laboratories typically use four methods to diagnose CDI: C. difficile culture, toxin detection using immunoassays, detection of glutamate dehydrogenase using immunoassays, and detection of toxin A/B gene. Each CDI diagnostic test has strengths and limitations, and varies in performance. Guidelines for CDI diagnosis have been developed by organizations that include the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, and American College of Gastroenterology. Certain other countries have guidelines. In Korea, surveys on CDI diagnosis performed in 2015 and 2018 revealed a shift in CDI testing in clinical laboratories in Korea. It is necessary to develop standardized diagnostic guidelines for CDI appropriate for the Korean context.

Effective treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection improves survival and affects graft-versus-host disease: a multicenter study by the Polish Adult Leukemia Group

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the most common cause of infectious diarrhea after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). The impact of CDI and its treatment on allo-HCT outcomes and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), including gastrointestinal GVHD (GI-GVHD) is not well established. This multicenter study assessed real-life data on the first-line treatment of CDI and its impact on allo-HCT outcomes. Retrospective and prospective data of patients with CDI after allo-HCT were assessed. We noted statistically significant increase in the incidence of acute GVHD and acute GI-GVHD after CDI (P = 0.005 and P = 0.016, respectively). The first-line treatment for CDI included metronidazole in 34 patients, vancomycin in 64, and combination therapy in 10. Treatment failure was more common with metronidazole than vancomycin (38.2% vs. 6.2%; P < 0.001). The need to administer second-line treatment was associated with the occurrence or exacerbation of GVHD (P < 0.05) and GI-GVHD (P < 0.001) and reduced overall survival (P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, the risk of death was associated with acute GVHD presence before CDI (hazard ratio [HR], 3.19; P = 0.009) and the need to switch to second-line treatment (HR, 4.83; P < 0.001). The efficacy of the initial CDI treatment affects survival and occurrence of immune-mediated GI-GVHD after allo-HCT. Therefore, agents with higher efficacy than metronidazole (vancomycin or fidaxomicin) should be administered as the first-line treatment.

Experience with PCR Testing for Enteric Bacteria and Viruses of Emergency Department Patients with Acute Gastroenteritis: Are There Implications for the Early Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection?

Early identification of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) pathogens via PCR may improve the management of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). In this study, we evaluated the implementation of a testing algorithm for ED patients with AGE using the BD MAX automated PCR system. Data from 133 patients were analyzed. A total of 56 patients (42%) tested positive via PCR for at least one bacterial or viral pathogen. The median time to report PCR results was 6.17 h compared to 57.28 h for culture results for bacterial pathogens. The most common pathogen was Clostridioides difficile (n = 20, 15%). In total, 14 of the 20 C. difficile-positive patients were aged >65 years and 17 of the 20 patients (85%) were diagnosed with a clinically relevant infection based on typical symptoms and laboratory values. They received antibiotics, mostly oral vancomycin, starting a median of 11.37 h after ED admission. The introduction of PCR for the diagnosis of AGE infection in patients presenting to the ED may have the greatest impact on the rapid identification of C. difficile and the timely administration of antibiotics if necessary.

SER-109 (VOWST™): A Review in the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection.

SER-109 (VOWST™; fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk) is a live biotherapeutic product indicated to prevent the recurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in patients 18years of age and older following standard of care (SOC) antibacterial treatment for recurrent CDI. It is a purified bacterial spore suspension sourced from healthy donors. As the first oral faecal microbiota product approved for prevention of recurrent CDI, SER-109 is administered as four capsules once daily for three consecutive days. In a well-designed, placebo-controlled, phaseIII trial (ECOSPORIII), SER-109 significantly reduced the risk of recurrent CDI at 8weeks post-treatment, with a durable response seen at 6months post-treatment. Treatment with SER-109 was also associated with rapid and steady improvement in health-related quality of life compared with placebo. SER-109 was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of placebo. The most common adverse events were of mild to moderate severity and generally gastrointestinal in nature. Thus, with the convenience of oral administration and lack of necessity for cold storage, SER-109 is a valuable option for preventing further CDI recurrence in adults following antibacterial treatment for recurrent CDI.

Efficacy Assessment of the Co-Administration of Vancomycin and Metronidazole in Clostridioides difficile-Infected Mice Based on Changes in Intestinal Ecology.

Vancomycin (VAN) and metronidazole (MTR) remain the current drugs of choice for the treatment of non-severe Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI); however, while their co-administration has appeared in clinical treatment, the efficacy varies greatly and the mechanism is unknown. In this study, a CDI mouse model was constructed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of VAN and MTR alone or in combination. For a perspective on the intestinal ecology, 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and non-targeted metabolomics techniques were used to investigate changes in the fecal microbiota and metabolome of mice under the co-administration treatment. As a result, the survival rate of mice under co-administration was not dramatically different compared to that of single antibiotics, and the former caused intestinal tissue hyperplasia and edema. Co-administration also significantly enhanced the activity of amino acid metabolic pathways represented by phenylalanine, arginine, proline, and histidine, decreased the level of deoxycholic acid (DCA), and downregulated the abundance of beneficial microbes, such as Bifidobacterium and Akkermansia. VAN plays a dominant role in microbiota regulation in co-administration. In addition, co-administration reduced or increased the relative abundance of antibiotic-sensitive bacteria, including beneficial and harmful microbes, without a difference. Taken together, there are some risks associated with the co-administration of VAN and MTR, and this combination mode should be used with caution in CDI treatment.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy Study of Ridinilazole Versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection: Clinical Outcomes With Microbiome and Metabolome Correlates of Response.

Exposure to antibiotics predisposes to dysbiosis and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) that can be severe, recurrent (rCDI), and life-threatening. Nonselective drugs that treat CDI and perpetuate dysbiosis are associated with rCDI, in part due to loss of microbiome-derived secondary bile acid (SBA) production. Ridinilazole is a highly selective drug designed to treat CDI and prevent rCDI. In this phase 3 superiority trial, adults with CDI, confirmed with a stool toxin test, were randomized to receive 10 days of ridinilazole (200 mg twice daily) or vancomycin (125 mg 4 times daily). The primary endpoint was sustained clinical response (SCR), defined as clinical response and no rCDI through 30 days after end of treatment. Secondary endpoints included rCDI and change in relative abundance of SBAs. Ridinilazole and vancomycin achieved an SCR rate of 73% versus 70.7%, respectively, a treatment difference of 2.2% (95% CI: -4.2%, 8.6%). Ridinilazole resulted in a 53% reduction in recurrence compared with vancomycin (8.1% vs 17.3%; 95% CI: -14.1%, -4.5%; P = .0002). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent ridinilazole benefit for reduction in rCDI across subgroups. Ridinilazole preserved microbiota diversity, increased SBAs, and did not increase the resistome. Conversely, vancomycin worsened CDI-associated dysbiosis, decreased SBAs, increased Proteobacteria abundance (∼3.5-fold), and increased the resistome. Although ridinilazole did not meet superiority in SCR, ridinilazole greatly reduced rCDI and preserved microbiome diversity and SBAs compared with vancomycin. These findings suggest that treatment of CDI with ridinilazole results in an earlier recovery of gut microbiome health. Clinical Trials Registration.Ri-CoDIFy 1 and 2: NCT03595553 and NCT03595566.

Gut-targeted therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A review.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. The global prevalence of T2DM has reached epidemic proportions, affecting approximately 463 million adults worldwide in 2019. Current treatments for T2DM include lifestyle modifications, oral antidiabetic agents, and insulin therapy. However, these therapies may carry side effects and fail to achieve optimal glycemic control in some patients. Therefore, there is a growing interest in the role of gut microbiota and more gut-targeted therapies in the management of T2DM. The gut microbiota, which refers to the community of microorganisms that inhabit the human gut, has been shown to play a crucial role in the regulation of glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity. Alterations in gut microbiota composition and diversity have been observed in T2DM patients, with a reduction in beneficial bacteria and an increase in pathogenic bacteria. This dysbiosis may contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease by promoting inflammation and impairing gut barrier function. Several gut-targeted therapies have been developed to modulate the gut microbiota and improve glycemic control in T2DM. One potential approach is the use of probiotics, which are live microorganisms that confer health benefits to the host when administered in adequate amounts. Several randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that certain probiotics, such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species, can improve glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in T2DM patients. Mechanisms may include the production of short-chain fatty acids, the improvement of gut barrier function, and the reduction of inflammation. Another gut-targeted therapy is fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), which involves the transfer of fecal material from a healthy donor to a recipient. FMT has been used successfully in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection and is now being investigated as a potential therapy for T2DM. A recent randomized controlled trial showed that FMT from lean donors improved glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity in T2DM patients with obesity. However, FMT carries potential risks, including transmission of infectious agents and alterations in the recipient's gut microbiota that may be undesirable. In addition to probiotics and FMT, other gut-targeted therapies are being investigated for the management of T2DM, such as prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics. Prebiotics are dietary fibers that promote the growth of beneficial gut bacteria, while synbiotics combine probiotics and prebiotics. Postbiotics refer to the metabolic products of probiotics that may have beneficial effects on the host. The NIH SPARC program, or the Stimulating Peripheral Activity to Relieve Conditions, is a research initiative aimed at developing new therapies for a variety of health conditions, including T2DM. The SPARC program focuses on using electrical stimulation to activate peripheral nerves and organs, in order to regulate glucose levels in the body. The goal of this approach is to develop targeted, non-invasive therapies that can help patients better manage their diabetes. One promising area of research within the SPARC program is the use of electrical stimulation to activate the vagus nerve, which plays an important role in regulating glucose metabolism. Studies have shown that vagus nerve stimulation can improve insulin sensitivity and lower blood glucose levels in patients with T2DM. Gut-targeted therapies, such as probiotics and FMT, have shown potential for improving glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in T2DM patients. However, further research is needed to determine the optimal dose, duration, and safety of these therapies.

Burden of Medically Attended Diarrhea and Outpatient Clostridioides difficile Infection Among Persons in 2 Large Integrated Healthcare Settings, 2016-2021.

Identification of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in the community setting is increasing. We describe testing for CDI among patients with medically attended diarrhea (MAD) in the outpatient setting, and the incidence of outpatient CDI. This was a retrospective cohort study among members ≥18 years of age from Kaiser Permanente Southern California and Kaiser Permanente Northwest from 1 January 2016 through 31 December 2021. MAD was identified by outpatient diarrheal International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnosis codes, and CDI through positive laboratory results. Outpatient CDI was defined by no hospitalization ≤7 days after specimen collection. Incidence rates (IRs) of outpatient CDI were stratified by select demographic and clinical variables. Outpatient CDI burden 12 months following index date was measured by CDI-associated healthcare visits, and CDI testing and treatment. We identified 777 533 MAD episodes; 12.1% (93 964/777 533) were tested for CDI. Of those tested, 10.8% (10 110/93 964) were positive. Outpatient CDI IR was 51.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.8-52.2) per 100 000 person-years, decreasing from 58.2 (95% CI, 55.7-60.7) in 2016 to 45.7 (95% CI, 43.7-47.8) in 2021. Approximately 44% (n = 4200) received an antibiotic 30 days prior to index date and 84.1% (n = 8006) CDIs were "community-associated" (no hospitalizations 12 weeks prior to index date). Of outpatient CDIs, 6.7% (n = 526) had a CDI-associated hospitalization ≤12 months. There was a high incidence of outpatient CDI despite infrequent CDI testing among patients with MAD. The majority of those with outpatient CDI had no recent antibiotic use and no recent hospitalization. Further studies are needed to understand the source and management of medically attended outpatient CDI.

European Practice for CDI Treatment.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Historically, two antibiotics (metronidazole and vancomycin) and a recent third (fidaxomicin) have been used for CDI treatment; convincing data are now available showing that metronidazole is the least efficacious agent. The European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) management guidance for CDI were updated in 2021. This guidance document outlines the treatment options for a variety of CDI clinical scenarios and for non-antimicrobial management (e.g., faecal microbiota transplantation, FMT). One of the main changes is that metronidazole is no longer recommended as first-line CDI treatment. Rather, fidaxomicin is preferred on the basis of reduced recurrence rates with vancomycin as an acceptable alternative. Recommended options for recurrent CDI now include bezlotoxumab as well as FMT.A 2017 survey of 20 European countries highlighted variation internationally in CDI management strategies. A variety of restrictions were in place in 65% countries prior to use of new anti-CDI treatments, including committee/infection specialist approval or economic review/restrictions. This survey was repeated in November 2022 to assess the current landscape of CDI management practices in Europe. Of 64 respondents from 17 countries, national CDI guidelines existed in 14 countries, and 11 have already/plan to incorporate the ESCMID 2021 CDI guidance, though implementation has not been surveyed in 6. Vancomycin is the most commonly used first-line agent for the treatment of CDI (n=42, 66%), followed by fidaxomicin (n=30, 47%). Six (9%) respondents use metronidazole as first-line agent for CDI treatment, whereas 22 (34%) only in selected low-risk patient groups. Fidaxomicin is more likely to be used in high-risk patient groups. Availability of anti-CDI therapy influenced prescribing in six respondents (9%). Approval pre-prescription was required before vancomycin (n=3, 5%), fidaxomicin (n=10, 6%), bezlotoxumab (n=11, 17%) and FMT (n=10, 6%). Implementation of CDI guidelines is rarely audited.Novel anti-CDI agents are being evaluated; it is not yet clear what will be the roles of these agents. The treatment of recurrent CDI is particularly troublesome, and several different live biotherapeutics are being developed, in addition to FMT.

Clostridioides Difficile: A Concise Review of Best Practices and Updates.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common and severe nosocomial infections worldwide. It can also affect healthy individuals in the community. The incidence of CDI has been on the rise globally for the past decade, necessitating a proactive approach to combat its spread; new strategies are being developed to enhance diagnostic accuracy and optimize treatment outcomes. Implementing the 2-step testing has increased diagnostic specificity, reducing the usage of CD-specific antibiotics with no concomitant increase in surgical complication rates. In 2021, the Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (IDSA/SHEA) shifted its preference for initial treatment to fidaxomicin over vancomycin and metronidazole due to its lower recurrence rate. It also prioritized fidaxomicin for the treatment of recurrent CDI. There are new developments on the frontiers of fecal microbiota therapies, with RBX2660 and SER-109 approved recently by the FDA for prevention, with other microbiome-based therapies in various development and clinical trials. This review offers providers an updated and practical guide for CDI management.

Clostridioides difficile Biofilm.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), previously Clostridium difficile infection, is a symptomatic infection of the large intestine caused by the spore-forming anaerobic, gram-positive bacterium Clostridioides difficile. CDI is an important healthcare-associated disease worldwide, characterized by high levels of recurrence, morbidity, and mortality. CDI is observed at a higher rate in immunocompromised patients after antimicrobial therapy, with antibiotics disrupting the commensal microbiota and promoting C. difficile colonization of the gastrointestinal tract.A rise in clinical isolates resistant to multiple antibiotics and the reduced susceptibility to the most commonly used antibiotic molecules have made the treatment of CDI more complicated, allowing the persistence of C. difficile in the intestinal environment.Gut colonization and biofilm formation have been suggested to contribute to the pathogenesis and persistence of C. difficile. In fact, biofilm growth is considered as a serious threat because of the related antimicrobial tolerance that makes antibiotic therapy often ineffective. This is the reason why the involvement of C. difficile biofilm in the pathogenesis and recurrence of CDI is attracting more and more interest, and the mechanisms underlying biofilm formation of C. difficile as well as the role of biofilm in CDI are increasingly being studied by researchers in the field.Findings on C. difficile biofilm, possible implications in CDI pathogenesis and treatment, efficacy of currently available antibiotics in treating biofilm-forming C. difficile strains, and some antimicrobial alternatives under investigation will be discussed here.

Microbiome-preserving antibiotics for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Newer antibiotics that specifically target Clostridioides difficile while preserving the host microbiome have emerged to treat C.difficile infection (CDI): cadazolid, fidaxomicin, ridinilazole, and surotomycin. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy for each antibiotic. Only randomized clinical trials of patients being treated for Clostridioides disease infection were included. Studies were sought in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization clinical trials register portal (up to December9, 2022). Sustained clinical cure was the outcome of treatment comparison, defined as the resolution of diarrhea without recurrence. Vancomycin was the standard treatment comparator. Meta-analysis was performed for each antibiotic. The overall certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)-classified as either high, moderate, low, or very low. Fourteen eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis with 4837 patients from 773 sites. Cadazolid did not increase sustained clinical cure relative to vancomycin (risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.96-1.13; moderate-certainty evidence). Fidaxomicin demonstrated a significant increase (RR 1.14, 95%CI 1.07-1.21; low-certainty evidence). In one phase2 study, ridinilazole demonstrated a significant increase in sustained clinical cure (RR 1.71, 95%CI 1.01-2.91; very low-quality evidence). Surotomycin did not show significant improvement (RR 1.05, 95%CI 0.96-1.14; moderate-certainty evidence). Fidaxomicin (in seven studies) demonstrated significant improvement in achieving sustained clinical cure. A limitation of this study may that more studies are needed to compare fidaxomicin with other antibiotics.