Clopidogrel Nonresponders Research Articles

Hanc score is a replicable clinical risk score for outcome prediction of Taiwanese clopidogrel non-responders after percutaneous coronary intervention

Hanc score is a replicable clinical risk score for outcome prediction of Taiwanese clopidogrel non-responders after percutaneous coronary intervention

The Impact of Preprocedural Platelet Function Testing on Periprocedural Complication Rates Associated With Pipeline Flow Diversion: An International Multicenter Study.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is necessary to minimize the risk of periprocedural thromboembolic complications associated with aneurysm embolization using pipeline embolization device (PED). We aimed to assess the impact of platelet function testing (PFT) on reducing periprocedural thromboembolic complications associated with PED flow diversion in patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel. Patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms requiring PED flow diversion were identified from 13 centers for retrospective evaluation. Clinical variables including the results of PFT before treatment, periprocedural DAPT regimen, and intracranial complications occurring within 72 h of embolization were identified. Complication rates were compared between PFT and non-PFT groups. Differences between groups were tested for statistical significance using the Wilcoxon rank sum, Fisher exact, or χ 2 tests. A P -value <.05 was statistically significant. 580 patients underwent PED embolization with 262 patients dichotomized to the PFT group and 318 patients to the non-PFT group. 13.7% of PFT group patients were clopidogrel nonresponders requiring changes in their pre-embolization DAPT regimen. Five percentage of PFT group [2.8%, 8.5%] patients experienced thromboembolic complications vs 1.6% of patients in the non-PFT group [0.6%, 3.8%] ( P = .019). Two (15.4%) PFT group patients with thromboembolic complications experienced permanent neurological disability vs 4 (80%) non-PFT group patients. 3.7% of PFT group patients [1.5%, 8.2%] and 3.5% [1.8%, 6.3%] of non-PFT group patients experienced hemorrhagic intracranial complications ( P > .9). Preprocedural PFT before PED treatment of intracranial aneurysms in patients premedicated with an aspirin and clopidogrel DAPT regimen may not be necessary to significantly reduce the risk of procedure-related intracranial complications.

Clopidogrel Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention using Multiplate Analyzer: Frequency and Outcomes

Objectives: Over and under response to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) can lead to bleeding and thrombotic events in patients undergoing coronary stent placement. The present study aimed to assess the platelet response to clopidogrel in patient undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using Multiplate Analyzer. The primary outcome in the present study was the short-term incidence of stent thrombosis and bleeding events. Background: Multiple electrode aggregometry is a rapid and standardized tool to for diagnosis of platelet defects and monitoring response to DAPT. Methods: A hospital-based, prospective study was conducted on 431 patients who underwent PCI from September 2016 to November 2017 and received clopidogrel therapy. The platelet aggregometry was done using a Multiplate analyzer (Dynabyte, Munich, Germany). Patients were followed for 30 days to assess the incidence of stent thrombosis and bleeding. Results: The patients’ mean age was 58 ± 6.7 years. A total of 40% of the patients were diabetic and 7.7% had chronic renal failure. The rate of clopidogrel non-responders was 10.7%, while clopidogrel over-responders were 18.3%. Patients with diabetes and chronic renal failure had significantly lower platelet responsiveness (40.1% with p &lt; 0.05 and 7.7% with p &lt;0.005, respectively). Smoking was significantly associated with platelet over-responsiveness (39.4%, p &lt; 0.001). Patients with low platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel were associated with an increased risk of definite stent thrombosis (p &lt; 0.005), while increasing bleeding risk was significantly associated with over-responsiveness to patients to clopidogrel (p &lt;0.001). Conclusions: Antiplatelet responsiveness showing individual variability with increased risk of stent thrombosis among the cases with no response to the effect of clopidogrel and high risk of bleeding with the over-responsiveness group.

Natural history of antiplatelet nonresponders undergoing carotid artery stenting.

Routine antiplatelet responsiveness testing for patients undergoing carotid artery stenting procedures is not performed at most endovascular centers and remains a topic of controversy within the neurointerventional community. The objective of this study was to determine if nonresponsiveness to acetylsalicylic acid or clopidogrel was associated with the development of symptomatic thromboembolic events in patients undergoing carotid stenting procedures. A prospective study was conducted at the Foothills Medical Centre in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, from August 2019 to July 2021. Patients undergoing carotid artery stenting procedures and who were receiving dual antiplatelet therapy were enrolled in the study. Responsiveness to the antiplatelet medications was determined through whole blood impedance aggregometry. The primary outcome was development of a symptomatic thromboembolic event within 90 days after the procedure. The treating physicians were blinded to the aggregometry results for the duration of the study. One hundred two procedures were performed in 100 patients. Eight thromboembolic events (8%) occurred during the study. Age (p = 0.03) and nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel (p = 0.003) were associated with the development of thromboembolic events. The multivariable model showed that clopidogrel nonresponsiveness was independently associated with the development of a thromboembolic event (adjusted OR 6.14, 95% CI 1.25-30.11, p = 0.03). This study demonstrated that patients who were identified as clopidogrel nonresponders, using whole blood impedance aggregometry, were at an increased risk of developing thromboembolic events. Larger studies are needed to assess the utility of routine platelet function testing prior to carotid artery stenting procedures.

Use of Tirofiban to Prevent Ischemic Events in Patients with CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Alleles during Flow Diversion of Intracranial Aneurysm: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

To analyze the effect of tirofiban on ischemic events in CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) allele carriers during pipeline embolization device (PED) implantation. Demographic information, imaging data, ischemic complications, CYP2C19 genotyping, and platelet function test results were collected from patients with PED-treated intracranial aneurysms at three centers. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors for ischemic events. Patients were grouped according to LOF alleles and antiplatelet drugs, the baseline information of LOF allele carriers and non-carriers were compared, and the efficacy of tirofiban was analyzed by comparing the incidence of ischemic events in each group. In total, 278 patients were included in the study, 24 of whom had an ischemic event. 157 (56.5%) patients carried the LOF allele and were more likely to develop resistance to clopidogrel (P < 0.001) and hypertension (P = 0.010). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the independent risk factors for ischemic events were age of > 55years (OR = 3.308, P = 0.028), LOF alleles (OR = 3.960, P = 0.036), and clopidogrel nonresponsiveness (OR = 3.301, P = 0.014). For LOF allele carriers, prophylactic use of tirofiban after PED implantation helped to reduce ischemic events (4.3% vs. 16.4%, P = 0.039). This study supports CYP2C19 genotyping before flow diversion because LOF alleles increase the risk of ischemic events. Prophylactic use of tirofiban may help reduce ischemic events in LOF allele carriers.

Cytochrome P450 2C19 Polymorphisms and Its Association With Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Post-coronary Intervention Patients on Clopidogrel in the Tertiary Care Center.

Background Clopidogrel has become essential in managing coronary artery disease and other atherothrombotic diseases. It is an inactive prodrug that needs biotransformation in the liver by various cytochrome P (CYP) 450 isoenzymes for its active metabolite formation.However, 4-30% of patients on clopidogrel have shown no or decreased antiplatelet response. This condition is called 'clopidogrel non-responsiveness' or 'clopidogrel resistance.' This is attributed to genetic heterogeneity causing interindividual variation and increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). This study aimed to assess MACEs and their association with CYP450 2C19 polymorphisms in post-coronary intervention patients on clopidogrel. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted on acute coronary syndrome patients, started on clopidogrel following coronary intervention. After considering inclusion and exclusion criteria, 72 patients were enrolled, and a genetic analysis was done. Based on genetic analysis, patients were divided into two groups, normal (CYP2C19*1) and abnormal phenotypes (CYP2C19*2 & *3). These patients were followed for two years, and the MACE during the first year and second yearwas compared between these two groups. Results Of 72 patients, 39 (54.1%) were normal, and 33 (45.8%) were abnormal genotypes. The mean age of patients is 67.71 ± 9.968. A total of 19 and 27 MACEs were seen during first- and second-year follow-ups.During the first-year follow-up, three (9.1%) patients with abnormal phenotypes developed ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and none of the phenotypically normal patients developed STEMI (p-value = 0.183).Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) was seenin three (7.7%) normal and seven (21.2%) abnormal phenotype patients (p-value=0.19). Other events, such as thrombotic stroke, stent thrombosis, and cardiac death, were seen in two (6.1%) abnormal phenotypic patients (p-value=0.401).During the second-year follow-up, STEMI was seen in one (2.6%) normal and three (9.7%) abnormal phenotypic patients (p-value=0.183). NSTEMI was seen in four (10.3%) normal and nine (29%) abnormal phenotype patients(p=0.045). Comparison of total MACEs between normal and abnormal phenotypic groups at the end of the first year(p-value=0.011) and second year (p-value=<0.01) has statistical significance. Conclusion We can infer that the risk of developing a recurrent MACEin post-coronary intervention patientson clopidogrel is significantly high in the abnormal phenotypic group (CYP2C19*2 & *3) than in normal phenotypic patients.

Tailored antiplatelet therapy in stent assisted coiling for unruptured aneurysms: a nationwide registry study

BackgroundAntiplatelet therapy, where regimens are tailored based on platelet function testing, has been introduced into neurointerventional surgery. This nationwide registry study evaluated the effect and safety of tailored antiplatelet therapy...

Influence of CYP450 Enzymes and ABCB1 Polymorphisms on Clopidogrel Response in Moroccan Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet prodrug primarily prescribed to prevent or treat acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or acute ischemic stroke (IS), polymorphisms of genes encoding cytochrome P-450 (CYP) and P-glycoprotein transporter, could affect the efficiency of clopidogrel absorption and biotransformation, especially during the first critical hours following its administration. The present study was designed to investigate the potential association of clopidogrel responsiveness and 14 polymorphisms in the genes encoding the CYPs (CYP2C9, 2C19, 3A4, 3A5, 1A2, and 2B6), the ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1). Platelet aggregation activity was measured after 8h of 300mg clopidogrel administration for fifty-five ACS patients. There was no significant association between polymorphism of the studied CYPs and clopidogrel responsiveness (P>0.05). The frequency of the ABCB1 3435 T allele in clopidogrel non-responders was higher (78.9%) compared to responders (52.8%), but this difference was not significant (P=0.057). Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, concomitant treatments were not associated with clopidogrel response. There was no effect of the studied genetic variations and demographic factors on the platelet activity of clopidogrel in Moroccan ACS patients.

Circulating Microvesicles in Convalescent Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Contributor to High-On-Treatment Residual Platelet Reactivity?

Exploration of novel and effective antiplatelet strategies for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke is utmost. Some platelet derived microparticles (PMVs) in convalescent stroke subjects were found to be predictive for the next vascular event. Patients with high-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) had a significantly higher risk for ischemic stroke. Here, we aimed to explore associations among circulating microparticles and responsivness to antiplatelet (clopidogrel) therapy. A total of 18 patients on clopidogrel therapy due to secondary stroke prevention were rospectively recruited into this study. Twenty age-matched healthy subjects served as controls. Flow cytometric measurements of microparicles (MVs) and data analysis were performed on Beckman-Coulter FC-500 cytometer with CXP software. Besides, platelet aggregometry data were revealed. Both measurements were performed in whole blood and from the lower and upper blood fractions separated after 1-hour gravity sedimentation by the analogy with erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The total number of circulating MVs, and particularly the platelet derived CD42+ and PAC-1+ were significantly higher in post-stroke patients (p < 0.001). The platelet aggregation in the whole blood (area under the curve, AUC) showed a significant negative correlation with the total number of MPs in the lower blood sample after 1-hour gravity sedimentation (r = -0.650, p = 0.005). Next, we analyzed associations among MPs and aggregometry data obtained from clopidogrel responders and non-responders. Both, area under the curve (AUC) and velocity in the whole blood showed opposite correlation with the total number of MVs in the lower blood sample after 1-hour gravity sedimentation. Importantly, a significant negative correlation was observed for the velocity (r = -0.801, p = 0.005), but not for the AUC in responders. Platelet derived CD42+ and PAC-1+ MVs showed positive correlations with neutrophils in the lower blood sample (p = 0.008 and p = 0.006 respectively). Circulating MVs may allow to monitor the response to antiplatelet therapy in post-stroke patients. In addition, the link between platelet derived MVs and neutrophil granulocytes might become therapeutic targets in the future.

415 Correlation of Platelet Reactivity Testing and CYP2C19 Metabolizer Status in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Neurointervention

INTRODUCTION: Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is clinically indicated for patients undergoing endovascular procedures. Clopidogrel is the most commonly used P2Y12 inhibitor used for DAPT, and is a prodrug bioactivated by the CYP2C19 enzyme. Inferring platelet response can be done by genotyping CYP2C19 to determine metabolizer status. Patients with two functional alleles are considered normal metabolizers (NM), patients with one or two increased activity alleles are rapid (RM) or ultra-rapid metabolizers (UM), respectively, and patients with one or two loss-of-function (LOF) alleles are intermediate (IM) or poor metabolizers (PM), respectively. Another method of measuring antiplatelet response to clopidogrel is the VerifyNow Platelet assay (measured in platelet reactivity units [PRUs]), but the optimal range of PRUs in neuro-endovascular procedures has not yet been established. At UF Health, platelet reactivity testing is routine, but CYP2C19 genotyping is less frequent in patients undergoing these procedures. METHODS: Data were collected from the EMR patients who had a CYP2C19 genotype result ordered by the neurosurgical department. We assessed platelet reactivity tests and antiplatelet medication changes between different phenotype groups. Phenotypes included ultra-rapid, rapid, normal, intermediate and poor metabolizers. Patients were categorized as non-responders to clopidogrel if their platelet reactivity tests were &gt;204 PRUs prior to medication change, hyper-responders if their platelet reactivity tests were &lt;20 PRUs, and optimal responders if reactivity fell between 20-204 PRUs. RESULTS: 41 neurosurgical patients were genotyped. CYP2C19 phenotypes included ultra-rapid metabolizers (10%), rapid metabolizers (34%), normal metabolizers (37%), intermediate metabolizers (12%) and poor metabolizers (7%). Six patients had dose decreased to 75 mg QOD; 83% were hyper-responders. Three patients had their dose halved; 100% were hyper-responders. Four patients were switched to ticagrelor; 100% were clopidogrel non-responders. CONCLUSION: Patients who had their clopidogrel dose reduced were generally classified as hyper-responders based on platelet reactivity testing, and majority had increased CYP2C19 enzyme activity based on genotype. Of the non-responders who had a medication change to alternative P2Y12 therapy,majority had decreased CYP2C19 enzyme activity.

Pharmacogenomic polygenic risk score for clopidogrel responsiveness among Caribbean Hispanics: A candidate gene approach.

This multicenter clinical study was aimed at conducting a targeted pharmacogenomic association analysis of residual on‐clopidogrel platelet reactivity in 474 Caribbean Hispanic patients. Platelet reactivity was measured using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and clopidogrel resistance was defined as P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs) greater than or equal to 208. Genotyping was performed using the whole‐genome Infinium MEGA BeadChip array. An ancestry‐adjusted, weighted polygenic risk score (wPGxRS) was developed to account for the effect of multiple variants on PRU and compared between clopidogrel responders and nonresponders. The mean PRU across the study cohort was 173.8 ± 68.5 and 33.5% of patients were defined as clopidogrel resistant. Multivariate linear regression showed that 19% of PRU variability was attributed to nine independent predictors, with CYP2C19*2 (rs4244285) accounting for ~ 7% of observed PRU variation (p < 0.001). PON1 rs662, ABCB1/MDR1 rs2032582, PEAR1 rs12041331 carrier status, and the interaction between African ancestry and rs12041331 carriers also predicted PRU among the participants (p ≤ 0.05). A clear gene‐dose effect was detected between PRU and CYP2C19*2 genotype, consistent with previous studies in European patient populations, as well as rs12777823. Importantly, a significant positive correlation was detected between our novel wPGxRS (4 variants) and PRU among the Hispanic patient population (r p = 0.35, p < 0.001). Moreover, the wPGxRS discriminated between nonresponders and responders (p = 0.003), indicating that this multigene‐based score is a useful predictor of clopidogrel resistance among Caribbean Hispanics. Taken together, these results help close the gap of knowledge on clopidogrel pharmacogenomics and its potential clinical implementation in this under‐represented population.

A Combination of Aspirin and Clopidogrel Predict More Favorable Dynamics of Platelet Reactivity versus Clopidogrel Alone in the Acute Phase of Minor Stroke.

Background: The combined use of clopidogrel and aspirin is recommended for the short-term (21 days) therapy of minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. Previous studies have demonstrated its efficacy and superiority over treatment with a single antiplatelet agent. However, there is insufficient support for the advantages of such therapy based on platelet function testing. We aimed to compare the effect of the concomitant use of clopidogrel and aspirin versus clopidogrel alone on the dynamics of platelet reactivity over time to determine the appropriate antiplatelet treatment strategy for minor strokes. Methods: We enrolled 74 ischemic stroke subjects, including 38 minor strokes. Platelet reactivity was assessed by impedance aggregometry (Multiplate Analyzer) 48 and 96 h after a first 75 mg dose of clopidogrel, using the acetylsalicylic acid platelet inhibition (ASPI) test and the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) test. Dual antiplatelet therapy was strictly reserved only to minor strokes, as the other strokes received clopidogrel alone in the secondary prevention. The dynamics of platelet reactivity refer to the difference between two assessments, and a decrease in values over time was considered favorable. Results: The incidence of clopidogrel non-responsiveness was 64.8%, and this was similar in the group of minor strokes and the group of more disabling strokes. We indicated diabetes mellitus as an independent predictor of high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (Odds ratio OR 5.69 95% Confidence Interval CI 1.13–41.26, p = 0.0386). Among minor strokes treated with dual antiplatelet therapy, in relation to clopidogrel, we reported a trend toward more favorable dynamics of platelet reactivity over time compared to the group using clopidogrel alone (p = 0.0652 vs. p = 0.3384, respectively). We identified five predictors (sex, female; small-vessel disease; no diabetes; no hyperlipidemia; and no alcohol abuse) related to a significant decrease in platelet reactivity over time with respect to clopidogrel. No significant dynamics of platelet reactivity when using aspirin were found. Conclusions: Our findings, based on the favorable dynamics of platelet reactivity over time in relation to clopidogrel, confirm the usefulness of dual antiplatelet therapy in minor strokes and support the continuation of the secondary prevention with clopidogrel alone rather than aspirin, particularly among identified beneficiaries of such a strategy.

TO EVALUATE THE PLATELET FUNCTION IN PATIENTS OF ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME RECEIVING DUALANTI-PLATELET THERAPY

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases are one of the leading cause of death in the world. Several factors have led to the increase in vascular disorders, including the aging population, unhealthy lifestyles, increasing rates of diabetes and raised lipids, and further risk factors resulting in inammation and calcication of the vascular endothelium. Activated platelets in damaged blood vessels can trigger arterial thrombus formation, leading to vascular occlusion with subsequent organ hypoperfusion and clinical manifestation of myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral artery disease.AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate platelet function in patients of Acute Coronary Syndrome 12hrs after loading dose of dual antiplatelet agents and evaluate platelet function in patients of Acute Coronary Syndrome on maintenance dose of dual anti-platelet agents in steady state. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 41 Adult Patients of both sexes admitted in Department of Cardiology, NRS Medical College and Hospital, a tertiary care hospital from 1ST FEBRUARY 2016 TO 31ST JULY 2017 (18months). RESULTAND ANALYSIS: In our study 51.2% were hypertensive. The study population were varied when it comes to occupation. Our study population consisted of 56.1% smokers and 43.9% non-smokers. The mean height of the study population was 165.8 cm. The maximum height was 180cm. The minimum height was 150cm. The mean weight of the study population was 61.36kg. The maximum weight was 76kg. The minimum weight was 49kg. The mean BMI was 22.36. The maximum was 27.77. The minimum was 18.56. Our study population consisted of 51.2% patients of Type II Diabetes Mellitus. CONCLUSION: This study was undertaken to assess the extent of Aspirin and Clopidogrel non-resposiveness in patients of Acute Coronary Syndrome. If non-responders are detected early particularly Clopidogrel non-responders, we can change the outcome with change of P2Y12 receptor antagonist at an early stage. Although most of the recent guidelines do not recommend routine platelet function testing but almost all studies show a strong association.

Outcomes and strategy of tailored antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor in patients undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization

ObjectiveAntiplatelet drug resistance is associated with periprocedural ischemic complications in patients undergoing intravascular stent implantation. Nonresponders are subject to increased risk of stent thrombosis and in-stent stenosis, and high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is present in up to 44% of patients taking clopidogrel, a widely used component of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Evidence points to ticagrelor as a viable alternative to overcome HTPR on clopidogrel. Studies have shown fewer thromboembolic events with ticagrelor therapy; however, results on bleeding risk are mixed, and its safety and efficacy in hybrid operative techniques have yet to be established. Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a hybrid procedure to treat severe carotid stenosis. The objective of this study was to establish the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor as part of DAPT in patients undergoing TCAR and to develop a protocol to ensure adequate antithrombotic protection throughout the operative course. MethodsData were collected retrospectively for patients undergoing TCAR on DAPT of aspirin and ticagrelor for symptomatic (≥50%) or asymptomatic (≥80%) carotid stenosis. Preoperative platelet reactivity was determined using Thromboelastography with Platelet Mapping (Haemonetics Corporation, Braintree, Mass), with adequate platelet reactivity defined as maximal amplitude produced by adenosine diphosphate <50 mm. The primary safety end point was 30-day major bleeding event rate. Primary efficacy end points were 30-day incidence of ipsilateral cerebrovascular ischemic event (stroke or transient ischemic attack), myocardial infarction, and death. Secondary end points were postoperative length of hospital stay, procedure time, and clamp/flow reversal time. ResultsSixty-seven TCAR procedures with patients receiving periprocedural DAPT of ticagrelor and aspirin were performed during the study period. Patients had an average age of 79 years, and 28 (42%) were symptomatic. The mean procedure time was 45.8 ± 9.2 minutes, with a mean clamp/flow reversal time of 4.8 ± 1.5 minutes, and mean postoperative length of hospital stay of 3.1 ± 2.2 days for inpatients and 1.3 ± 0.8 days for outpatients. Technical success was achieved in all cases, with no 30-day major bleeding events and no occurrence of ipsilateral cerebrovascular ischemic event, myocardial infarction, or death. ConclusionsInitial experience with ticagrelor as part of DAPT in patients undergoing TCAR demonstrated its safety and efficacy in both symptomatic and asymptomatic disease. No bleeding events or thromboembolic complications occurred. Furthermore, a protocol to administer ticagrelor to assay for HTPR on ticagrelor and consequent medication and patient management is proposed. Ticagrelor may represent a safe and effective alternative to overcome clopidogrel nonresponsiveness in DAPT regimens for TCAR.

Effects of colchicine on platelet aggregation in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel.

Platelets aggregation leading to thrombosis plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and of stent thrombosis. Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus an ADP-receptor inhibitor (ticagrerol, prasugrel or clopidogrel) is recommended to reduce the risk of other platelet-mediated events. Clopidogrel is recommended in patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes (CCS) or in ACS patients at high bleeding risk. Unfortunately, up to 30% of patients are non-responders to clopidogrel and show residual high platelet reactivity (HPR). Colchicine (COLC) is a drug with cardiovascular effects. We have demonstrated that COLC might exert protective cardiovascular effects by interfering with cytoskeleton rearrangement, a phenomenon involved in platelet aggregation. Here, we investigate in vitro the effects of colchicine on platelet aggregation of patients on DAPT with clopidogrel. Platelets obtained from 35 CCS patients on therapy with clopidogrel were pre-incubated with COLC 10 µM before being stimulated with ADP (20 µM), or TRAP (25 µM) at 0, 30, 60 and 90 min to measure max aggregation by LTA. Platelets not COLC-preincubated served as controls. Seven patients were pre-selected as clopidogrel non-responders. COLC significantly reduced TRAP-induced platelet aggregation in clopidogrel responders and non-responders. Interestingly, COLC inhibited ADP-induced platelet aggregation in clopidogrel non-responders in which ADP still caused activation despite DAPT. We demonstrate that COLC inhibits platelet aggregation in clopidogrel non-responders with HPR despite DAPT with this ADP receptor-inhibitor. Further in vivo studies should be designed to evaluate the opportunity to prescribe colchicine after ACS/CCS to overcome the clopidogrel limitations in the DAPT therapy.

The Pipeline Embolization Device: Changes in Practice and Reduction of Complications in the Treatment of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms in a Multicenter Cohort.

The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED; Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) has become an important tool for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Since FDA approval, there are ongoing efforts to increase aneurysm occlusion rates and reduce the incidence of complications. To assess aneurysm occlusion and complication rates over time. Retrospective analysis of consecutive anterior circulation aneurysms treated with a single PED between 2011 and 2016 at 3 academic institutions in the US was performed. Factors contributing to changes in aneurysm occlusion and complication rates over time were identified and evaluated. A total of 284 procedures were performed on 321 anterior circulation aneurysms in 284 patients. At a median follow-up of 13 mo (mean 18 mo), complete or near complete occlusion (>90%) was achieved in 85.9% of aneurysms. There was no significant change in aneurysm occlusion rate or procedure length over time. Thromboembolic complication occurred in 8.1% of procedures, and there was a trend toward decreased incidence from 16.3% in 2011/2012 to 3.3% in 2016 (P=.14). Hemorrhagic complications significantly decreased from 8.2% in 2011/2012 to 0 to 1.0% in 2014-2016 (P=.1). We report a notable drop in the rate of hemorrhagic and to a lesser extent thromboembolic complications with increased experience with PED in a multicenter cohort. Multiple factors are believed to contribute to this drop, including the evolved interpretation of platelet function testing, the switching of clopidogrel nonresponders to ticagrelor, and the reduced use of adjunctive coiling.

P25 Polymorphism of CYP2C19 is associated with poor platelet response to clopidogrel and indirectly affect TIMIi-flow among asian patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI

Abstract Background The platelet response to clopidogrel treatment is very important in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI. Asian populations have been shown to have higher proportion of CYP2C19 gene polymorphism that may alter biotransformation of clopidogrel, than Caucasians. However, It is unclear whether platelet reactivity measured by P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) is affected by CYP2C19 polymorphism, and whether it will impair coronary flow among Asian patients with STEMI after primary PCI. Purpose: We sought to define whether polymorphisms on CYP2C19 genes will affect platelet reactivity response to Clopidgrel therapy, and whether subsequently it will affect the TIMI flow in Asian patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Method: We studied 90 patients with STEMI receiving 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel prior to primary PCI. High-on-treatment platelet reactivity was evaluated using the VerifyNow Assay. Patients with platelet reactivity more than 208 PRU are categorized as non-responders to Clopidogrel. Genotyping of CYP2C19 was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Post primary PCI TIMI flow was categorized into good (TIMI flow 3), and impaired (TIMI flow &amp;lt;3). Results: Among all 90 patients (median age = 54.5 years old; 93.3% male), there were 36.6 % patients with CYP2C19 polymorhisms, carrying *2 or *3 alleles. Platelet reactivity test revealed 23.4% of all patients were Clopidogrel non-responders. Multivariate analysis showed CYP2C19 polymorphism is associated with Clopidogrel non-reponders (OR 4.7, p = 0.030), along with other factors such as: Diabetes, Renal impairment, and use of proton pump inhibitor drugs. After successful stent implantation during primary PCI, there were 24.4% patients still with TIMI flow &amp;lt; 3. There was no direct correlation between CYP2C19 polymorphism and TIMI flow &amp;lt; 3 after primary PCI. However, we found significant association between Clopidogrel non-reponders and TMI flow &amp;lt; 3 after primary PCI in those STEMI patients (OR 3.3, p = 0.046). Conclusions: In Asian patients with STEMI receiving clopidogrel prior to primary PCI, the CYP2C19 polymorphisms is associated with poor platelet response to Clopidogrel therapy. The Clopidogrel non-responders is associated with impaired TIMI flow after primary PCI.

Association of ABCB1 Gene Polymorphisms and Clopidogrel Responsiveness in Iranian Patients undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet agent currently used for preventing stent thrombosis. Despite certain clinical benefits of clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), adequate antiplatelet effect has not been obtained in some patients. The present study was designed to investigate the potential association of ABCB1 (ATP-Binding Cassette, Subfamily B, member1) gene polymorphism, and clopidogrel responsiveness in Iranian patients after PCI. Sixty-seven patients were included in the study. Blood samples were taken from patients at baseline, 2 h after administration of 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel, 24 h and 30 days after PCI. Platelet aggregation was measured by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) with two levels of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) concentrations (5 and 20 µM). ABCB1 genotyping was performed by restriction fragment length polymorphism-polymerase chain reaction (RFLP-PCR). The allelic frequencies of wild type, heterozygote, and homozygote genotypes of ABCB1 were 20.9%, 74.6%, and 4.5%, respectively. There was no significant association between polymorphism of ABCB1 and clopidogrel non-responsiveness (P > 0.05) in various situations. No significant difference was observed for demographic characteristics. Genetic and demographic factors had no significant effect on the platelet activity of clopidogrel in an Iranian population.

Expanding the Indications for Flow Diversion: Treatment of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms.

Posterior circulation aneurysms are often associated with a higher risk of rupture and compressive symptoms compared to their anterior circulation counterpart. Due to high morbidity and mortality associated with microsurgical treatment of those aneurysms, endovascular therapy gained ascendance as the preferred method of treatment. Flow diversion has emerged as a promising treatment option for posterior circulation aneurysms with a higher occlusion rate compared to other endovascular techniques and a lower complication rate compared to microsurgery. While treatment of saccular and dissecting aneurysms is often associated with comparatively good outcomes, fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms should be carefully selected prior to treatment to avoid devastating thromboembolic complications. Occlusion of covered posterior circulation branches showed no correlation with ischemic complications, and appropriate antiplatelet regimen and switching Clopidogrel nonresponders to different antiplatelet agents were associated with lower complication rates following flow diversion of posterior circulation aneurysms.

Microvesicles from patients with acute coronary syndrome enhance platelet aggregation

Microvesicles (MVs) released from leukocytes, platelets and endothelial cells are elevated in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In the present study, we assessed the potential pro-aggregatory properties of MVs obtained from ACS patients. Thus, we divided the patients into two groups based on clopidogrel-responsiveness, i.e. high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR; n = 16), and low or normal on-treatment platelet reactivity (non-HPR; n = 14), respectively. MVs from patients were obtained by high-speed centrifugation, and the pro-aggregatory effect of MVs added to fresh isolated platelets from healthy subjects were analyzed by 96-well microplate aggregometry. MVs from HPR patients significantly enhanced spontaneous platelet aggregation around two times more than MVs from non-HPR patients. The pro-aggregatory effect of three out of four MV phenotypes correlated to MV-concentrations as determined by flow cytometry. Furthermore, MVs from patients with diabetes mellitus (n = 9) had a stronger pro-aggregatory effect compared to MVs from those without diabetes (n = 21; p = .025 between groups). In conclusion, MVs from ACS patients with clopidogrel non-responsiveness enhance platelet aggregation, as do MVs from ACS patients with diabetes. Thus, MVs from patients with hyperreactive platelets boost platelet aggregation. Blocking MV-formation may reduce platelet hyperreactivity.