Clinically Significant Macular Edema Research Articles

Correlation of gut microbial diversity to sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy

PurposeTo determine the association of gut microbiome diversity and sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) amongst patients with pre-existing diabetes.MethodsA cross-sectional study was performed, wherein 54 participants selected in total were placed into cases cohort if diagnosed with STDR and those without STDR but had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus of at least 10-year duration were taken as controls. Statistical analysis comparing the gut microbial alpha diversity between cases and control groups as well as patients differentiated based on previously hypothesized Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes(B/F) ratio with an optimal cut-off 1.05 to identify patients with STDR were performed.ResultsComparing gut microbial alpha diversity did not show any difference between cases and control groups. However, statistically significant difference was noted amongst patients with B/F ratio ≥1.05 when compared to B/F ratio < 1.05; ACE index [Cut-off < 1.05:773.83 ± 362.73; Cut-off > 1.05:728.03 ± 227.37; p-0.016]; Chao1index [Cut-off < 1.05:773.63 ± 361.88; Cut-off > 1.05:728.13 ± 227.58; p-0.016]; Simpson index [Cut-off < 1.05:0.998 ± 0.001; Cut-off > 1.05:0.997 ± 0.001; p-0.006]; Shannon index [Cut-off < 1.05:6.37 ± 0.49; Cut-off > 1.05:6.10 ± 0.43; p-0.003]. Sub-group analysis showed that cases with B/F ratio ≥ 1.05, divided into proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and clinically significant macular edema (CSME), showed decreased diversity compared to controls (B/F ratio < 1.05). For PDR, all four diversity indices significantly decreased (p < 0.05). However, for CSME, only Shannon and Simpson indices showed significant decrease in diversity (p < 0.05).ConclusionsBased on clinical diagnosis, decreasing gut microbial diversity was observed among patients with STDR, although not statistically significant. When utilizing B/F ratio, the decreasing gut microbial diversity in STDR patients seems to be associated due to species richness and evenness in PDR when compared to decreasing species richness in CSME.

Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy among Self-reported Newly Diagnosed Diabetics

Introduction: Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) poses a significant threat to individuals with diabetes, leading to visual impairment and blindness if not promptly addressed. This study focuses on the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among self-reported newly diagnosed diabetics. Material method: This is a prospective study on 200 self-reported newly diagnosed diabetics from April 2022 to May 2023. Patient data, including complaints, diabetes duration, family history, hypertension, and therapy details, were comprehensively analyzed. Complete Ocular examinations including best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, slit lamp examination, fundus examinations, and Fundus fluorescein angiography were done. Diabetic Retinopathy was graded using a modified ETDRS grading system. Laboratory investigations included complete blood count, fasting and postprandial blood sugar, lipid profile, renal function test, and Hb1AC levels, providing a thorough assessment of patients’ ocular and systemic health. Result: Out of the 200 diabetics, 43.5% had diabetic retinopathy, with a slightly higher prevalence in males (44.64%) compared to females. The age group 50 - 59 had the highest prevalence (74.19%), and Hindus, Muslims, and other communities showed comparable percentages. Family history and hypertension were significant factors, with 88% of those with a family history developing retinopathy. NPDR was predominant (87.35%), while 12.64% had PDR. Clinically Significant Macular Edema (CSME) was present in 59.77%, with 80.76% of these cases having concomitant hypertension. Conclusion: The study emphasizes the imperative for early detection and comprehensive management of diabetic retinopathy among newly diagnosed diabetics. Age, gender, family history, and hypertension emerge as crucial determinants, advocating for integrated care and targeted screening programs to safeguard vision.

Characterization of central-involved diabetic macular edema using OCT and OCTA.

To characterize the occurrence of diabetic macular edema and the presence of abnormal retinal fluid accumulation in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). In this two-year prospective study, a total of 122 eyes with diabetes type 2 underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT-Angiography in association with OCT-Fluid imaging, a novel algorithm of OCT analysis allowing quantification of abnormal accumulation of fluid in the retina through low optical reflectivity ratios (LOR). Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grading for diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity assessment was performed using 7-field color fundus photography. Best corrected visual acuity was also recorded. During the 2-year follow-up, 23 eyes (19%) developed central-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) and 2 eyes (2%) developed clinically significant macular edema (CSME). In the two-year period of the study, eyes that developed CI-DME showed a progressive increase in central retinal thickness (CRT) (β = 7.7 ± 2.1 µm/year, p < 0.001) and in LOR values (β = 0.009 ± 0.004 ratio/year, p = 0.027). The increase in CRT and abnormal retinal fluid, represented by increased LOR ratios, are associated with increased retinal perfusion in the deep capillary plexus (DCP) (skeletonized vessel density, p = 0.039). In contrast, the eyes with CSME showed decreased retinal perfusion and abnormal fluid located in the outer layers of the retina. CI-DME and CSME appear to represent different entities. Eyes with CI-DME show increases in abnormal retinal fluid associated with increased retinal vascular perfusion in the DCP. Eyes with CSME are apparently associated with decreased retinal vascular perfusion in the DCP and abnormal fluid in the outer retina.

A Comparative Study of Serum Lipid Profiles in Diabetic Patients with and without Clinically Significant Macular Oedema

Abstract Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major health hazard today. Clinically significant macular oedema (CSME) is the most frequent cause of decreased vision in diabetic patients. The aim of our study was to determine whether CSME in subjects with type 2 DM is associated with lipid profile abnormalities and to compare them with lipid profiles of type 2 diabetics without CSME. Method: This was a cross-sectional case-control study. Hundred consecutive type 2 diabetic patients, 50 patients with and 50 without CSME, who attended the Retina outpatient clinic of a tertiary eye hospital over a one-year period, were included. Determination of the presence of CSME and staging of diabetic retinopathy was done according to modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study guidelines, by a single investigator using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. After obtaining informed consent, blood was drawn from the subjects after overnight fasting. Investigations done were lipid profile, fasting blood sugar, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), blood urea, and blood pressure measurement. Results: In our study, only two systemic factors weighed in as predictors of macular oedema: Systolic hypertension and serum lipids. Subanalysis of the lipid fractions yielded two significant correlates of CSME: Total cholesterol and serum triglycerides. Conclusion: A multifaceted healthcare team approach is essential for the management of diabetic patients. Ophthalmologists should evaluate the lipid profile of all diabetic macular oedema (DME) patients. Physicians should promptly refer diabetic patients with deranged lipid profiles to ophthalmologists to look for DME and provide appropriate ophthalmic care.

Intensive Glycemic Management Is Associated With Reduced Retinal Structure Abnormalities on Ocular Coherence Tomography in the DCCT/EDIC Study.

To investigate quantitative and qualitative changes in retinal structure using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and their associations with systemic or other risk factors in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). In the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study, OCT images were obtained during study years 25-28 (2019-2022) in 937 participants; 54% and 46% were from the original intensive (INT) and conventional (CONV) glycemic management treatment groups, respectively. Average age for participants was 61 years old, diabetes duration 39 years, and HbA1c 7.6%. Participants originally in the CONV group were more likely to have disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) (CONV 27.3% vs. INT 18.7%; P = 0.0003), intraretinal fluid (CONV 24.4% vs. INT 19.2%; P = 0.0222), and intraretinal cysts (CONV 20.8% vs. INT 16.6%; P = 0.0471). In multivariable models, sex, age, smoking, mean updated systolic blood pressure, and history of "clinically significant" macular edema (CSME) and of anti-VEGF treatment were independently associated with changes in central subfield thickness, while HbA1c, BMI, and history of CSME and of ocular surgery were associated with DRIL. Visual acuity (VA) decline was associated with significant thinning of all retinal subfields except for the central and inner nasal subfields. Early intensive glycemic management in T1D is associated with a decreased risk of DRIL. This important morphological abnormality was associated with a history of macular edema, a history of ocular surgery, and worse VA. This study reveals benefits of intensive glycemic management on the retina beyond features detected by fundus photographs and ophthalmoscopy.

Application of optical coherence tomography angiography in the assessment of diabetic macular edema staging and laser photocoagulation efficacy

ObjectiveThis study aimed to analyze the effect of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) on diabetic macular edema (DME) staging and assess the efficacy of laser photocoagulation. MethodsEighty-six patients (141 eyes) with suspected DME who visited our hospital from August 2019 to March 2022 were selected and underwent fundus angiography and OCTA. The two examination methods were compared in terms of their efficacy in macular edema staging. Subsequently, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of OCTA in diagnosing DME were assessed using fundus angiography as the gold standard. In patients with clinically significant macular edema (CSME) treated with laser photocoagulation, the central concave non-perfused zone (FAZ), vascular density (VD), central macular retinal thickness (CRT), whole retinal blood flow density (FD-300), superficial capillary plexus (SCP), and deep capillary plexus (DCP) were measured using the OCTA 3 mm × 3 mm mode before treatment, at 3 months after treatment, and at 6 months after treatment. SCP, deep capillary plexus (DCP), blood flow density (VD), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central retinal thickness (CRT) were recorded before treatment, 3 months after treatment, and 6 months after treatment. The correlation between BCVA and pre-treatment OCTA parameters at 6 months after treatment was analyzed using Pearson's correlation. ResultsFundus angiography was performed in 86 patients (141 eyes) with suspected DME. Of the 141 eyes, 44 had no leakage, 52 had diffuse edema, 40 had focal macular edema, and 5 had eyes ischemia. A total of 97 eyes showed CSME on fundus angiography. Using fundus angiography as the gold standard, OCTA exhibited a sensitivity of 97.94 %, a specificity of 63.64 %, and an accuracy of 87.23 % in diagnosing CSME. The Kappa value between OCTA and fundus angiography was 0.674. The receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) of OCTA in diagnosing CSME was 0.808 (95 % confidence interval: 0.717–0.899). The BCVA was higher, while the CRT was lower in CSME patients at 3 and 6 months after treatment (P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in the OCTA parameters in CSME patients at 3 months after treatment compared with that before treatment (P>0.05). Similarly, no significant difference was found in the FD300 of CSME patients at 6 months after treatment compared with that before treatment (P>0.05). However, the FAZ area, DCP-VD (overall, central concave, and paracentral concave), and SCP-VD (overall, central concave, and paracentral concave) were higher in CSME patients at 6 months after treatment compared with that before treatment (P<0.05). Pearson's correlation showed that BCVA was positively correlated with pre-treatment FAZ area, DCP-VD, and SCP-VD (r>0, P<0.05), and negatively associated with CRT (r<0, P<0.05). ConclusionOCTA exhibited high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis and staging DME. It adeptly captures the microvascular and visual changes in the central macular recess before and after laser photocoagulation therapy, which can quantitatively guide the follow-up treatment of DME.

Vascular changes of the choroid and their correlations with visual acuity in diabetic retinopathy.

To investigate changes in the choroidal vasculature and their correlations with visual acuity in diabetic retinopathy (DR). The cohort was composed of 225 eyes from 225 subjects, including 60 eyes from 60 subjects with healthy control, 55 eyes from 55 subjects without DR, 46 eyes from 46 subjects with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), 21 eyes from 21 subjects with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and 43 eyes from 43 subjects with clinically significant macular edema (CSME). Swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) was used to image the eyes with a 12-mm radial line scan protocol. The parameters for 6-mm diameters of region centered on the macular fovea were analyzed. Initially, a custom deep learning algorithm based on a modified residual U-Net architecture was utilized for choroidal boundary segmentation. Subsequently, the SS-OCT image was binarized and the Niblack-based automatic local threshold algorithm was employed to calibrate subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), luminal area (LA), and stromal area (SA) by determining the distance between the two boundaries. Finally, the ratio of LA and total choroidal area (SA + LA) was defined as the choroidal vascularity index (CVI). The choroidal parameters in five groups were compared, and correlations of the choroidal parameters with age, gender, duration of diabetes mellitus (DM), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood sugar, SFCT and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were analyzed. The CVI, SFCT, LA, and SA values of patients with DR were found to be significantly lower compared to both healthy patients and patients without DR (P< 0.05). The SFCT was significantly higher in NPDR group compared to the No DR group (P < 0.001). Additionally, the SFCT was lower in the PDR group compared to the NPDR group (P = 0.014). Furthermore, there was a gradual decrease in CVI with progression of diabetic retinopathy, reaching its lowest value in the PDR group. However, the CVI of the CSME group exhibited a marginally closer proximity to that of the NPDR group. The multivariate regression analysis revealed a positive correlation between CVI and the duration of DM as well as LA (P < 0.05). The results of both univariate and multivariate regression analyses demonstrated a significant positive correlation between CVI and BCVA (P = 0.003). Choroidal vascular alterations, especially decreased CVI, occurred in patients with DR. The CVI decreased with duration of DM and was correlated with visual impairment, indicating that the CVI might be a reliable imaging biomarker to monitor the progression of DR.

Prevalence and associated factors of diabetic retinopathy among people with diabetes screened using fundus photography at a community diabetic retinopathy screening program in Nepal

BackgroundThis study aimed to assess the prevalence and associated factors of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and vision threatening DR (VTDR) among people with diabetes screened using fundus photography in Nepal.MethodsThis is a retrospective study among people with diabetes presented for DR screening using fundus photography from 2013 to 2019. Detailed demographics, duration of diabetes, medical history, visual acuity, and grading of DR on fundus photography were analyzed. Fundus camera used in the study were;Topcon digital fundus camera 900 CXR and digital portable fundus cameras (Nidek-10 portable non-mydriatric fundus camera; Versacam & Trade & Alpha, France), and a Zeiss portable fundus camera (Zeiss Visucout 100). Macula centred and disc centred 45 degree two images were taken from each eye. Pupil were dilated in cases where there was media haze in un-dilated cases. DR was graded using early treatment diabetic retinopathy study criteria. The images were graded by fellowship trained retina specialist. DR prevalence included any DR changes in one or both eyes.ResultsTotal of 25,196 patients with diabetes were enrolled. Mean age was 54.2 years with Standard Deviation (S.D):12.9 years, ranging from 6 years to 97 years. Type 1 and type 2 diabetes comprised of 451 people (1.79%) and 24,747 (98.21%) respectively. Overall, 1.8% of the images were un-gradable. DR prevalence was 19.3% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 18.8 − 19.7%). DR prevalence in type 1 and type 2 diabetes was 15.5% (95% CI: 12.5 − 18.6%) and 19.3% (CI: 18.8 − 19.8%) respectively. Clinically significant macular edema (CSME) was found in 5.9% (95% CI: 5.6-6.2%) and VTDR in 7.9% (95% CI: 7.7-8.3%). In multivariate analysis, our study revealed strong evidence to suggest that there is meaningful association between DR and VTDR with duration of diabetes, diabetic foot, diabetic neuropathy, agriculture occupation, those under oral hypoglycaemic agents or insulin or both as compared to those under diet only, and presenting visual acuity > 0.3LogMAR.ConclusionPrevalence and associated factors for DR and VTDR were similar to other DR screening programs in the region. Emphasis on wider coverage of DR screening could help for timely detection and treatment of STDR to avoid irreversible blindness.

Prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy at first presentation to vitreoretinal services in Bhutan: a 3-year national study.

To determine the prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) at first presentation among diabetic patients attending national vitreoretinal (VR) services in Bhutan STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study METHODS: We included all diabetic patients in Bhutan who presented for retinal evaluation for the first time over a 3-year period (2013-2016). Data including demography, clinical details, diagnostic tests, and clinical staging of DR were analyzed. A total of 843 diabetic patients, aged 57.2 ± 12.0 (range 18-86) years, were enrolled. The majority were male (452, 53.6%; cumulative frequency [cf] 391, 46.4%; P = .14) and from urban settings (570, 67.6%; cf 273; 32.4%) and did not have modern schooling (555, 65.8%). Hypertension was the most common systemic comorbidity (501, 59.4%). The prevalence of DR was 42.7%, with mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR) being the most common type (187, 51.9%), followed by moderate NPDR (88, 24.4%) and proliferative DR (45, 12.5%). In addition, 120 patients had clinically significant macular edema (CSME), with a prevalence of 14.2%. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 6/60 or worse occurred in 231 eyes (13.7%), and 41 patients (4.86%) had BCVA of 6/60 or worse bilaterally due to DR/CSME. A logistic regression model indicated that the major determinant of DR was the duration of diabetes, the odds rising by 1.27× with each year of disease (P < .0001). The prevalence of DR, including CSME, was high. Although a national DR screening program is established in Bhutan, there is a need to accelerate health education, community screening, and referral systems to reduce the prevalence of DR and CSME.

Predictive factors and visual outcomes after immediate pars plana vitrectomy for posteriorly dislocated lens fragments during complicated phacoemulsification surgery.

To investigate the prognostic factors for visual outcome in patients undergoing immediate pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for posteriorly dislocated lens fragments during phacoemulsification surgery. This was a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study of 37 eyes of 37 patients undergoing immediate PPV for posteriorly dislocated lens fragments from 2015 to 2021. The primary outcome measure was changes in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Additionally, we analyzed the predictive factors for poor visual outcomes (BCVA <20/40) and perioperative complications. The mean (±standard deviation [SD]) age of the patients was 66.57 (±10.86) years, with an almost identical gender profile (M: F = 18/19 [48.64%:51.36%]). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) log of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA improved significantly from the baseline (1 [0.6-1.48], ~20/200) to the final visit (0.3 [0.2-0.6], ~20/40) (P < 0.0001) after a mean (±SD) follow-up of 6.35 (±6.32) months. The final BCVA was 20/40 or better in 59.5% of the eyes. Poor final BCVA (<20/40) was associated with small preoperative pupillary size (P = 0.02), presence of preoperative ocular pathology (P = 0.02) including uveitis, glaucoma, and clinically significant macular edema (CSME), intraoperative displacement of >50% of lens matter into the vitreous (P < 0.001), use of iris-claw lens (P < 0.001), and postoperative cystoid macular edema (CME; P = 0.007). The postoperative complications included CME (13.51%), retinal detachment (10.81%), chronic uveitis (8.11%), glaucoma (8.11%), iritis (2.7%), posterior chamber IOL (PCIOL) dislocation (2.7%), and vitreous hemorrhage (2.7%). For retained lens fragments in complicated phacoemulsification surgery, immediate PPV is a viable approach with the potential for a good visual outcome. The important predictors for poor visual outcomes include a small preoperative pupil size, preexisting ocular pathology, displacement of significant volume of lens matter (>50%), use of an iris-claw lens, and CME.

Proportion of people with diabetic retinopathy and macular oedema varies by ethnicity in a tertiary retinal clinic in Australia: findings from the Liverpool Eye and Diabetes Study (LEADS)

ObjectiveThere are limited data on the influence of ethnicity on diabetic retinopathy (DR). We sought to determine the distribution of DR by ethnic group in Australia.DesignClinic-based cross-sectional study.SettingParticipants with diabetes...

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) changes in clinically significant macular oedema(CSME) in the patients attending a tertiary eye hospital

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) changes in clinically significant macular oedema(CSME) in the patients attending a tertiary eye hospital

Effects of Intra-Vitreal Diclofenac in Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

Objectives: To see the effects of Intra-Vitreal Diclofenac injection (IVD) in refractory Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).&#x0D; Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.&#x0D; Place and Duration of Study: Retina Clinic, Al-Shifa Trust Eye Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan from Sep 2019 to Feb 2020.&#x0D; Methodology: Patients included in the study having Clinically Significant Macular Edema (CSME) with Central Macular Thickness (CMT) of more than 300 microns not responding to three consecutive Intravitreal injections of Bevacizumab (IVB).Intravitreal Diclofenac injection (500μg/0.1 ml) was given by the same retina fellow with the same protocol across all patients.Each patient was evaluated based on Central Macular Thickness (CMT) before intravitreal Diclofenac injection and on followup visits one week and one month after injection.&#x0D; Results: A total of 30 patients (30 eyes) were included in the study. Out of these, 11 were females, and 19 were males. The mean age of the patients was 57.87±4.424 years. Mean Central Macular Thickness (CMT) before injection was 439.67±110.45µm, after one week 398.47±110.55µm and 384.87±119.11µm after one month of intra-vitreal Diclofenac injection. Pre and post-injection central macular thickness (µm), which was clinically significant (p-value &lt;0.001).&#x0D; Conclusion: Intravitreal Diclofenac injection (IVD) is effective in diabetic macular oedema, not responding to intravitreal antiVEGF (IVB) injections.

Relationships Between the Cumulative Incidences of Long-term Complications in Type 1 Diabetes: The DCCT/EDIC Study.

To describe the relationships between the cumulative incidences of long-term complications in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and assess whether observed associations are independent of age, duration of diabetes, and glycemic levels. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), clinically significant macular edema (CSME), reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), amputations, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and mortality were assessed in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study over ∼30 years. The cumulative incidence of complications ranged from 3% (amputations) to 37% (CSME). There were large differences in the cumulative incidence of PDR between participants with versus without prior CSME (66% vs. 15%), reduced eGFR (59% vs. 29%), and amputation (68% vs. 32%); reduced eGFR with or without prior PDR (25% vs. 9%), amputation (48% vs. 13%), and CVD (30% vs. 11%); CVD with or without prior reduced eGFR (37% vs. 14%) and amputation (50% vs. 16%); and mortality with or without prior reduced eGFR (22% vs. 9%), amputation (35% vs. 8%), and CVD (25% vs. 8%). Adjusted for age, duration of T1D, and mean updated HbA1c, the complications and associations with higher risk included PDR with CSME (hazard ratio [HR] 1.88; 95% CI 1.42, 2.50), reduced eGFR (HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.01, 1.97), and CVD (HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.06, 1.92); CSME with higher risk of PDR (HR 3.94; 95% CI 3.18 4.89), reduced eGFR (HR 1.49; 95% CI 1.10, 2.01), and CVD (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.03, 1.78); reduced eGFR with higher risk of CVD (HR 2.09; 95% CI 1.44, 3.03), and death (HR 3.40; 95% CI 2.35, 4.92); amputation(s) with death (HR 2.97; 95% CI 1.70, 2.90); and CVD with reduced eGFR (HR 1.59; 95% CI 1.08, 2.34) and death (HR 1.95; 95% CI 1.32, 2.90). Long-term micro- and macrovascular complications and mortality are highly correlated. Age, diabetes duration, and glycemic levels do not completely explain these associations.

Retinopathy During the First 5 Years of Type 1 Diabetes and Subsequent Risk of Advanced Retinopathy.

To determine whether individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who develop any retinopathy at any time prior to 5 years of diabetes duration have an increased subsequent risk for further progression of retinopathy or onset of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), clinically significant macular edema (CSME), diabetes-related retinal photocoagulation, or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. Additionally, to determine the influence of HbA1c and other risk factors in these individuals. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) was assessed longitudinally using standardized stereoscopic seven-field fundus photography at time intervals of 6 months to 4 years. Early-onset DR (EDR) was defined as onset prior to 5 years of T1D duration. Cox models assessed the associations of EDR with subsequent risk of outcomes. In unadjusted models, individuals with EDR (n = 484) had an increased subsequent risk of PDR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.51 [95% CI 1.12, 2.02], P = 0.006), CSME (HR 1.44 [1.10, 1.88], P = 0.008), and diabetes-related retinal photocoagulation (HR 1.48 [1.12, 1.96], P = 0.006) compared with individuals without EDR (n = 369). These associations remained significant when adjusted for HbA1c, but only the association with PDR remained significant after adjustment for age, duration of T1D, HbA1c, sex, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, pulse, use of ACE inhibitors, albumin excretion rate, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR 1.47 [95% CI 1.04, 2.06], P = 0.028). These data suggest that individuals with any sign of retinopathy within the first 5 years of T1D onset may be at higher risk of long-term development of advanced DR, especially PDR. Identification of early-onset DR may influence prognosis and help guide therapeutic management to reduce the risk of future visual loss in these individuals.

Diabetic Retinopathy and Associated Risk Factors Among Diabetic Patients Attending Eye Camps In Northern Bangladesh

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of vision loss which occurs as a result of microvascular complication of diabetes. The aim of the study is to assess the prevalence and factors associated with development of diabetic retinopathy among diabetic patients attending eye camps in a diabetic hospital of northern Bangladesh. Methods: This was a population-based cross-sectional study, conducted through five comprehensive eye camps at diabetic association hospital in Nilphamari, Bangladesh. Previously diagnosed patients with Diabetes Mellitus attending eye camps were the sample of this study which included a total of 254 participants. All participants underwent complete eye examination to check for any signs of DR with any other ocular abnormalities. Retinopathy was determined by fundus photography and direct ophthalmoscopy. Participants were also interviewed and examined to determine their demographic characteristics, clinical conditions, awareness on diabetic retinopathy and regularity of their eye visits. Results: A total of 254 subjects were screened for diabetic retinopathy. Of them, 64 (25.2%) had diabetic retinopathy including, including 53 (20.9%) with non-proliferative retinopathy (NPDR) and 11 (4.3%) with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Clinically significant macular edema (CSME) was detected in 7 patients (2.7%). The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was higher among patients with greater duration of diabetes (p=&lt; 0.001), poor glycemic control (p=0.002) and presence of hypertension (p=0.05). Conclusion: Regular screening in patients with diabetes for early detection of diabetic retinopathy by effective screening program and increasing public awareness are highly recommended in Bangladesh. JOPSOM 2021; 40(2):16-25

Effects of Hydroxychloroquine on Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy in Subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

The study was conducted to investigate the effects of hydroxychloroquine, an anti-inflammatory drug, which was recently approved and used as an add on oral antidiabetic drug for uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) on an adequate dose of sulfonylurea and metformin on the progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of hydroxychloroquine on the onset of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) and progression of the disease. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) charts with 3 or more lines worsening of visual acuity and the development of clinically significant macular edema (CSME) were added as secondary objectives as described in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). This retrospective analysis was done from medical records of all Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients who also had T2DM and were treated with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) 400 mg OD or 200 mg BID (N=65) and received ophthalmologic care at an endocrinology clinic in India up to a mean follow-up of 3.5±0.5 years and matched subjects taking any other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and pioglitazone (N=34). Baseline characteristics were similar in both the groups, with matched glycated haemoglobin (9.1 % and 9.2 % respectively, p=0.127). In both groups, over 3.5 years, HbA1c was reduced significantly. No new cases of DR were detected in the HCQ group, whereas 2 patients had developed DR in the pioglitazone group. At the base line visit, mild non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR) was present in 18 eyes and 14 eyes in the HCQ and pioglitazone groups, respectively. Progression to moderate NPDR over 3.5 years occurred in 2 out of 18 (11 %) eyes in the HCQ group and 8 out of 14 (57 %) eyes in the pioglitazone group, respectively, representing a significant relative risk reduction (p=.001). No patients had progressed from mild NPDR to severe NPDR in the HCQ group, whereas 2 eyes had progressed from mild NPDR to severe NPDR in the pioglitazone group. None of the patients in either arm developed diabetic macular oedema. Progression of DR from mild to moderate NPDR or severe NPDR may be delayed by HCQ. Large scale randomised prospective clinical trial is required to establish the risk-benefit profiles of HCQ in T2DM.ct.

Effect of Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide in Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

Objectives: To see the effect of Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide (PSTT) injection in refractory Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).&#x0D; Study Design: Quasi-Experimental Study.&#x0D; Place and Duration of Study: Retina Clinic, Al-Shifa Trust Eye Hospital, Rawalpindi, from Jun to Dec 2018.Methodology: Patients with Clinically Significant Macular Edema (CSME), with Central Macular Thickness (CMT) &gt;300 microns and those who did not respond to three consecutive Intra-Vitreal Bevacizumab (IVB) injections were included. Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide (PSTT) was administered by a single retina fellow using the same protocol. Each patient’s best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Intra-ocular pressure (IOP) and Central Macular Thickness (CMT) were evaluated on the day of Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide (PSTT) injection and again at 1, 3 and 6 months.&#x0D; Results: Out of 52 patients (104 eyes), 16 females and 36 males were present. The mean age was 57.67±9.35 years. Out of 52 right eyes, the mean Central Macular Thickness (CMT) at the first visit was 388.83±172.04 µm, 332.81 ± 144.69 µm after one month, 292.81±147.59µm after six months of Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide (PSTT) Injection. Similarly, for 52 left eyes mean Central Macular Thickness (CMT) at the first visit is 375.79±160.81 µm, 364.52 ± 167.95 µm after one month and 323.37±155.74 µm after six months. Similar results were observed for IOP and BCVA.&#x0D; Conclusion: Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone (PSTT) injections are effective in diabetic macular oedema, which does not respond to intravitreal anti-VEGF (IVB) therapy.

Association of Dyslipidemia with Clinically Significant Macular Edema (CSME) in Type – II Diabetes Mellitus

Aim: To observe the association between dyslipidemia and CSME in Type – II diabetes mellitus. Method: With convenience type of sampling technique 36 patients of diabetic retinopathy (DR) with CSME (Group–I) and another 35 patients of DR without CSME (Group – II) aged &gt; 40 years were selected in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) for this case control study from March’2013 to March’2014. Diagnosis of DR and CSME were carried out by history, clinical examination, fasting blood glucose (FBG), blood glucose 2 hours after breakfast, HbA1c (glycated hemoglobin), color fundus photograph (CFP) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) of macula as per ETDRS (Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study) criteria. Then fasting lipid profile was measured and compared between the groups. Result: Between two groups age, sex and occupation were matched. Dyslipidemia was present in 32 (88.9%) cases in Group–I and in 18 (51.4%) cases in Group – II, (p =0.001). Mean Total Cholesterol(TC) (211.8 mg/dl), Low Density Lipoprotein(LDL) (141.6 mg/dl) and Triglyceride(TG) (207 mg/dl) in Group – I were significantly higher than mean Total Cholesterol (183.3 mg/dl), Low Density Lipoprotein (118.5 mg/dl) and Triglyceride (143.5 mg/dl) in Group –II (p = &lt; 0.05). But High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) was significantly lower in group- I (35.8 mg/dl) than group -II (41.1 mg/dl). Conclusion: Diabetic retinopathy with CSME has close association with dyslipidemia.

Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown on the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IntroductionWorldwide, diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of vision loss. Early treatment and screening for DR have a major role in reducing the rate of the disease and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic-related restrictions have altered real-world practice patterns in managing DR.Aims and objectivesTo evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of DR amongst patients presenting to a tertiary eye care center in Gujarat, India.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study comparison of ophthalmic findings of 72 patients who presented to a tertiary care hospital with the manifestation of DR before and after the COVID-19 outbreak and subsequent lockdown. All the patients underwent detailed ophthalmic examinations, including optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA).ResultsThe mean age of participants was 54.5 years, with the mean duration of diabetes being five years since first detected. Diabetes was present in 26 patients out of 72. The number of follow-up visits to an ophthalmologist before COVID-19 was at least every one to three months, which significantly decreased after the lockdown of COVID-19. We found a significant progression of DR and clinically significant macular edema (CSME) in patients with diabetes. Before COVID-19, there were two mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), seven moderate NPDR, 15 severe NPDR, and 15 very severe NPDR, which were increased post lockdown to three, nine, 27, and 21, respectively. The proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) vitreous hemorrhage (VH) and tractional retinal detachment (TRD) were also increased to 12 after lockdown as compared to only six before the COVID-19 lockdown. The causes for progression are inability to attend regular check-ups, inability to take proper treatment of diabetes and DR, poor control of diabetes, episode of COVID-19, history of high dose of steroid use, poor kidney function, and not knowing that there is a progression of the disease. A common reason for not visiting an ophthalmologist was fear of the unknown due to COVID-19.ConclusionsCOVID-19 has severely impacted the routine follow-up of DR and, in the subsequent years, there might be an increased incidence of severe outcomes due to DR. The second wave of COVID-19 and its lockdown have had very significant effects on the visual outcome of untreated DR patients.