Clinically Relevant Non-major Bleeding Research Articles

Assessment of Temporary Warfarin Reversal in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: the KVAD Study*

Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) require interruption of warfarin for invasive procedures, but parenteral bridging is associated with many complications. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) can temporarily restore hemostasis in patients undergoing anticoagulation with warfarin. This pilot study evaluated the strategy of using variable-dose 4F-PCC to immediately and temporarily reverse warfarin before invasive procedures without holding warfarin in patients with LVADs. The duration of effect of 4F-PCC on factor levels and time to reestablish therapeutic anticoagulation post procedure were assessed. Adult patients with LVADs and planned invasive procedures were enrolled from a single center. Warfarin was continued uninterrupted. The 4F-PCC dose administered immediately pre-procedure was based on study protocol. International normalized ratio (INR)- and vitamin K-dependent factor levels were collected before and during the 48 hours after 4F-PCC administration. The use of parenteral bridging, International Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) and thromboembolic events at 7 and 30 days were collected. In 21 episodes of 4F-PCC reversal, median baseline INR was 2.7 (IQR 2.2-3.2). The median dosage of 4F-PCC administered was 1794 units (IQR 1536-2130). At 24 and 48 hours post 4F-PCC administration, median INRs were 1.8 (IQR 1.7-2.0) and 2.0 (IQR 1.9-2.4). Two patients required postoperative bridging. One patient experienced major bleeding within 72 hours, and 2 experienced CRNMB within 30 days. There were no thromboembolic events. Baseline and post 4F-PCC vitamin K-dependent factor levels corresponded with changes in INR values. The median time to achieve therapeutic INR post-procedure was 2.5 days (IQR, 1-4). Administration of 4F-PCC for temporary reversal of warfarin for invasive procedures in patients with LVADs allowed for continued warfarin dosing with minimal use of post-intervention bridging, limited bleeding and no thromboembolic events.

Factor Xa inhibitors versus warfarin in severely obese patients with venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation

Objectives: Clinical data for the safety and efficacy of Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors in severely obese patients is limited. Additional information is needed to assess the risks and benefits of using FXa inhibitors in this patient population. Materials and Methods: A single-center and retrospective chart review was conducted in severely obese patients (body mass index [BMI] >40 kg/m2 or weight >120 kg), who received rivaroxaban, apixaban or warfarin for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment or prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). The primary endpoint was treatment failure, defined as recurrent VTE in VTE treatment or stroke, transient ischemic attack or systemic embolism in AF within one year of anticoagulation initiation. Secondary endpoints included a composite of major bleeding rates and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) rates. Results: Seventy-three patients were included in the final analysis consisting of 43 patients in the FXa inhibitor arm (apixaban [n = 33] and rivaroxaban [n = 10]) and 30 patients in the warfarin arm. The rate of treatment failure was similar between the FXa inhibitor and warfarin groups (4.7% vs. 6.7%; P = 0.814). Although not statistically significant, major bleeding and CRNMB occurred less frequently in patients receiving FXa inhibitors compared to warfarin (9.3% vs. 23.3%; P = 0.182). Subgroup analysis in patients with BMI >50 kg/m2 or weight >150 kg demonstrated similar efficacy and safety outcomes. The use of non-recommended dosing was more common in the apixaban group compared to the rivaroxaban group. Conclusion: FXa inhibitors (apixaban and rivaroxaban) appear to have similar efficacy and safety compared to warfarin in severely obese patients. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

Secondary Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) with Low Dose Apixaban or Rivaroxaban: Results from a Patient Population with More than 2 Years of Median Follow-up.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Nowadays, DOACs represent the gold standard for long-term anticoagulation, with low-intensity DOACs administration becoming increasingly used worldwide in such scenario. Albeit low-intensity apixaban and rivaroxaban are approved for clinical usage as secondary VTE prophylaxis, there are few literature data regarding their efficacy and safety with a long follow-up. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose DOACs for VTE secondary prophylaxis in patients at high risk of VTE recurrence. We retrospectively evaluated patients who required long-term anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis to prevent recurrent VTE, treated with apixaban 2.5 mg BID or rivaroxaban 10 mg daily with a follow-up ≥ 12 months. The examined patients were 323. The median low-dose DOAC administration time was 25.40 months (IQR 13.93-45.90). Twelve (3.7%) VTE recurrences were observed; 21 bleeding events were registered (6.5%), including one episode of Major bleeding (MB) (0.3%), 8 Clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) (2.5%) and 12 minor bleeding (3.7%). No statistically significant difference in the rate of VTE recurrence and/or bleeding events emerged between the rivaroxaban and apixaban groups. Patients included in the study for multiple episodes of VTE presented a significantly higher risk of a new VTE recurrence during low-intensity DOAC. Our data suggest that low-dose DOACs may be effective and safe in secondary VTE prophylaxis in patients at high risk of VTE recurrence; however, attention might be needed in their choice in such a scenario for patients who experienced multiple episodes of VTE.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) used as an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for thromboprophylaxis after cancer surgery for venous thromboembolic events (VTE) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus LMWH in these patients. A search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science was carried out and included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that directly compared DOACs with LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in patients after cancer surgery through July 25, 2023. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were VTE, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) within 30days of surgery. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023445386). We retrieved 5149articles, selected 27 for eligibility, and included 10 studies (three RCTs and seven observational studies) encompassing 3054 patients who underwent postoperative thromboprophylaxis with DOACs (41%) or LMWH (59%). Compared to LMWH thromboprophylaxis, DOACs had a comparable risk of VTE (RR:0.69[95% CI:0.46-1.02], I2 = 0%), major bleeding (RR:1.55 [95% CI:0.82-2.93], I2 = 2%), and CRNMB (RR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.4-1.98], I2 = 31%) during the 30-day postoperative period. Subgroup analysis of VTE and major bleeding suggested no differences according to study type, extended thromboprophylaxis, tumor types, or different types of DOAC. DOACs are potentially effective alternatives to LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing cancer surgery, without increasing the risk of major bleeding events.

Cardiovascular medications used for comorbid diseases in patients with atrial fibrillation. The JoFib study.

Many atrial fibrillation (AF) patients use cardiovascular medications for indications other than AF. These medications can affect morbidity and mortality. We aim to investigate the characteristics of AF patients who use different medication classes and their clinical course. We collected data from the prospective, multicenter registry, JoFib study. We identified classes of non-AF medications (medications not used for rate control, rhythm control, or anticoagulation), described demographic and clinical characteristics, and investigated AF-related outcomes according to these medication classes. From a total of 2020 patients, five classes of cardiovascular non-AF medications were identified, aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, ACE inhibitors/ARBs, statins, and diuretics. The most commonly used non-AF medications were diuretics and ACE inhibitors/ARBs (39.2%, and 39%, respectively). 51% of AF patients took more than one non-AF medication. Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that ACE inhibitor/ARB therapy independently reduced the risks of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality (aHR 0.50, 95%CI 0.37-0.68; aHR 0.51, 95%CI 0.34-0.75, respectively) and that statin therapy reduced the risk of cardiovascular mortality (aHR 0.68, 95%CI 0.48-0.98) in AF patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated a protective effect of statin therapy against the secondary outcome, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) (adjusted OR 0.62 95%CI 0.42-0.94). Our findings suggest a protective effect of ACE inhibitors/ARBs against all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, statins against cardiovascular mortality, and CRNMB in patients with AF. Accordingly, these medications should be encouraged in patients with AF when indicated. Additionally, future research should explore whether these medications should be offered to AF patients more routinely. The study was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier number: NCT03917992, Registration date:14/4/2019).

Developing a machine learning model for bleeding prediction in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis receiving anticoagulation therapy

BackgroundOnly 1 conventional score is available for assessing bleeding risk in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT): the CAT-BLEED score. ObjectivesOur aim was to develop a machine learning–based risk assessment model for predicting bleeding in CAT and to evaluate its predictive performance in comparison to that of the CAT-BLEED score. MethodsWe collected 488 attributes (clinical data, biochemistry, and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, diagnosis) in 1080 unique patients with CAT. We compared CAT-BLEED score, Ridge and Lasso logistic regression, random forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms for predicting major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurring 1 to 90 days, 1 to 365 days, and 90 to 455 days after venous thromboembolism (VTE). ResultsThe predictive performances of Lasso logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost were higher than that of the CAT-BLEED score in the prediction of bleeding occurring 1 to 90 days and 1 to 365 days after VTE. For predicting major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding 1 to 90 days after VTE, the CAT-BLEED score achieved a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.48 ± 0.13, while Lasso logistic regression and XGBoost both achieved AUROCs of 0.64 ± 0.12. For predicting bleeding 1 to 365 days after VTE, the CAT-BLEED score achieved a mean AUROC of 0.47 ± 0.08, while Lasso logistic regression and XGBoost achieved AUROCs of 0.64 ± 0.08 and 0.59 ± 0.08, respectively. ConclusionThis is the first machine learning–based risk model for bleeding prediction in patients with CAT receiving anticoagulation therapy. Its predictive performance was higher than that of the conventional CAT-BLEED score. With further development, this novel algorithm might enable clinicians to perform personalized anticoagulation strategies with improved clinical outcomes.

A Novel Nomogram for Predicting Warfarin-Related Bleeding: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Warfarin is a widely used anticoagulant, and bleeding complications are the main reason why patients discontinue the drug. Currently, there is no nomogram model for warfarin-associated bleeding risk. The aim of this study was to develop a risk-prediction nomogram model for warfarin-related major and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. A total of 280 heart disease outpatients taking warfarin were enrolled, 42 of whom experienced major or CRNM bleeding at the one-year follow-up. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression model was employed to identify potential predictors. Backward stepwise selection with the Akaike information criterion was used to establish the optimal predictive nomogram model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plot, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. The nomogram consisted of four predictors: female (OR = 1.85; 95% CI: 0.91-3.94), TIA (OR = 6.47; 95% CI: 1.85-22.7), TTR (OR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.97-1.00), and anemia (OR = 2.30; 95% CI: 1.06-4.84). The model had acceptable discrimination (area under the ROC curve = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.59-0.78), and was significantly better than the existing nine warfarin-related bleeding prediction scoring systems. The calibration plot and Hosmer-Lemeshow test (χ² = 7.557; P = .478) indicated well-calibrated data in the model. The DCA demonstrated good clinical utility. In this study, we developed a nomogram to predict the risk of warfarin-related major or CRNM bleeding. The model has good performance, allows rapid risk stratification of warfarin users, and provides a basis for personalized treatment.

Real-world Data on Treatment Patterns and Bleeding in Cancer-associated Thrombosis: Data from the TROLL Registry.

Background International guidelines are increasingly recommending direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as the first-line treatment for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). However, data regarding treatment patterns and adherence to guidelines in patients with CAT are scarce. Objectives This study aimed to explore anticoagulant treatment patterns in patients with CAT and to calculate the incidence rates of bleeding events. Methods Patients ≥18 years with active cancer and a first-time venous thromboembolism between 2005 and 2020 were identified through the Venous T hrombosis R egistry in Østf OL d Hospita L . Outcome measures were patterns of anticoagulant treatment during the study period and bleeding events. We calculated overall incidence rates per 100 person-years and 6- and 12-month cumulative incidence of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) during anticoagulant treatment. Results Median age of 842 CAT patients at the time of thrombosis was 69 years (interquartile range 61-77), and 443 (52.6%) were men. In total, 526 patients (62.5%) had pulmonary embolism and 255 (30.3%) had deep vein thrombosis. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was prescribed to 713 (85.8%) patients, whereas 64 (7.7%) received DOACs and 54 (6.5%) received vitamin K antagonists as the initial anticoagulant treatment. Prescription of DOACs as initial treatment increased from 3.0% in 2013/2014 to 18.0% in 2019/2020. The incidence rate of major bleeding was 6.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.2-9.2) and 10.1 (95% CI 8.0-12.9) in CRNMB. Conclusion Most patients were treated with LMWH. However, a gradual shift in treatment toward DOACs was observed. Overall, bleeding complications were rare and comparable to those reported in randomized trials.

Evaluation of Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Therapeutic Characteristics, and Prognostic Outcomes of Coexisting Heart Failure among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: The Jordan Atrial Fibrillation (JoFib) Study.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly encountered cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice. Heart failure (HF) can occur concurrently with AF. We compared different demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic characteristics between patients with AF+HF and patients with AF only. Furthermore, we explored whether concurrent HF independently predicts several outcomes (all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE), major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB)). Comparisons between the AF+HF and the AF-only group were carried out. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were constructed for each outcome to assess whether HF was predictive of any of them while controlling for possible confounding factors. A total of 2020 patients were included in this study: 481 had AF+HF; 1539 had AF only. AF+HF patients were older, more commonly males, and had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, and chronic kidney disease (p≤0.05). Furthermore, AF+HF patients more commonly had pulmonary hypertension and low ejection fraction (p≤0.001). Finally, HF was independently predictive of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 2.17, 95% CI (1.66-2.85) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR 2.37, 95% CI (1.68-3.36). Coexisting AF+HF was associated with a more labile and higher-risk population among Jordanian patients. Furthermore, coexisting HF independently predicted higher all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Efforts should be made to efficiently identify such cases early and treat them aggressively.

Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus apixaban for venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) including rivaroxaban and apixaban are preferred over vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus apixaban in the treatment of VTE. We conducted an electronic search for studies that directly compared treatment with rivaroxaban and apixaban in adult patients with VTE. The relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated and pooled using a fixed-effect model unless significant heterogeneity was present (I2 > 40%), then random-effects model was used. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were recurrent VTE (rVTE) and major bleeding events, respectively. Nine observational studies were included in our meta-analysis, assessing 24,156 patients for apixaban and 38,847 for rivaroxaban. Pooling of data for our primary efficacy outcome showed a trend towards lower risk of rVTE with apixaban compared to rivaroxaban (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57-1.04, I2 = 53%). Analysis of our primary safety outcome showed a significantly lower risk of major bleeding with apixaban compared to rivaroxaban (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.61-0.76, I2 = 0%). Apixaban was associated with significantly decreased risk of net clinical harm, clinically relevant non major bleeding (CRNMB) and any bleeding, compared to rivaroxaban (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.92, I2 = 50%; RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.50-0.67, I2 = 7%; RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.59-0.70, I2 = 0%, respectively). Apixaban is associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared to rivaroxaban for treatment of VTE. Given the limitations of the existing evidence, further interventional studies comparing the two drugs are needed.

Venous thromboembolism management in people with cystic fibrosis.

Rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are increasing in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). Providers treating VTE in PwCF have reported low confidence concerning anticoagulant drug selection, dose, duration, and drug-drug interactions. As there are currently no published reports regarding management of VTE in PwCF, our objective was to describe the management of VTE in PwCF. PwCF and VTE at the University of Utah Health were identified through electronic medical record searches. Patients were categorized into one of three treatment groups: warfarin, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The primary outcome was episodes of major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) bleeding. Nine PwCF with a total of 12 unique VTE episodes were included in the study, with all but one episode associated with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Of the 12 VTE cases, 25% were treated with warfarin, 50% with a DOAC, and 25% with LMWH. There were no episodes of major bleeding and only one episode of CRNM bleeding (Hemoptysis) in the LMWH group. All anticoagulant doses and durations generally followed guidelines for persons without CF. DOACs were the most common VTE treatment, at doses and duration consistent with guidelines for persons without CF, with no major or CRNM bleeding. VTE treatment in PwCF is generally consistent with guidelines for persons without CF with low rates of bleeding. DOACs are a potential option for treatment of VTE in PwCF, but more research is needed.

Bleeding and Thrombotic Outcomes in Adults with Cancer-Associated Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia

Introduction: Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) can arise as a complication in patients with underlying cancers, especially gastrointestinal malignancies, as well as other comorbidities such as liver disease. In patients with cancer-associated thrombosis, thrombocytopenia is a common co-occurrence that can complicate management decisions around anticoagulation. Data on the optimal management of SVT in patients with malignancies is limited, and the risk of bleeding and recurrent thrombosis in patients with cancer-associated SVT and thrombocytopenia is unclear. Methods: We identified patients with radiographic diagnosis of cancer-associated SVT at our institution between 2010 and 2021. Exclusion criteria included squamous and basal cell carcinomas and myeloproliferative neoplasms. We manually reviewed all medical records to determine baseline clinical data and clinical outcomes. We performed log-binomial regression to identify independent risk factors for major bleeding, using age at thrombosis (continuous), gender, prior major bleed, baseline creatinine (continuous), use of antiplatelets, and use of anticoagulants as covariates. We present these data as adjusted risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We subsequently used Cox models with inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores for thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 100,000/uL within 15 days before or after diagnosis of SVT) to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs for our outcomes of interest. Independent variables used in propensity scoring included all variables included in the adjusted models plus type of cancer (hematologic, solid tumor). Outcomes included major bleeding, clinically relevant non major bleeding (CRNMB), clinically relevant bleeding (major bleeding + CRNMB), progression and recurrence of SVT, and development of usual-site VTE (DVT or PE) up to one year following the initial SVT. Progression was defined as extension of the thrombus contiguously into a new vein, and recurrence was defined as a new interval thrombus which was non-contiguous with the initial thrombus. Results: A total of 581 patients with cancer and SVT were identified. Baseline demographics, clinical history, laboratory data, and details of SVT are shown in Table 1. Of note, 44.2% of patients had cirrhosis, and the most common cancer types were hepatobiliary (55.2%) and pancreatic (22.0%); 40.7% of patients had metastatic disease. Of 512 patients with available platelet count data, 39.5% of patients had platelet count <100,000/uL; of these 512, 14.1% were <75,000/uL, and 12.7% were <50,000/uL. Most (70.6%) SVT were bland thrombi based on radiology interpretation, 19.9% were tumor thrombi, and 5.5% were mixed type, with the remainder being of uncertain etiology. Survival at one year was 41.5%, and median follow-up time was 5.5 months (interquartile range: 1.4-22.2). Only 4.0% of patients received a thrombectomy, and 39.2% were treated with anticoagulation within two weeks of diagnosis. The cumulative incidence of major bleeding event within one year of SVT diagnosis was 11.0% (95% CI: 8.5-13.5). This was primarily upper GI bleeding (70.3% of major bleeds). Multivariate regression analysis identified only male gender as an independent predictor of major bleeding (aRR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.99), as shown in Table 2. In the propensity score-weighted Cox models, thrombocytopenia was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding within one year (aHR: 1.65, 95% CI: 0.32-8.41). The cumulative incidence of CRNMB at one year was 6.7% (95% CI: 4.7-8.7), and cumulative incidence of clinically relevant bleeding was 17.7% (95% CI: 14.6-20.8). The cumulative incidence of progression or recurrence of SVT at one year was 16.3% (95% CI: 13.3-19.3). In the weighted Cox models, patients with thrombocytopenia did not impact the risk of progression or recurrence of SVT (aHR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.58-2.26). The cumulative incidence of usual-site VTE at one year was 5.7% (95% CI: 3.8-7.5). Conclusion: Thrombocytopenia was a common co-occurrence in cancer-associated SVT. Major bleeding- especially upper GI bleeding- was a common complication of cancer-associated SVT. Recurrent or progressive SVT was also frequent, which highlights the challenges of optimal management in this high-risk population. We found that thrombocytopenia was not an independent risk factor for major bleeding in this population.

Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation. Liver cirrhosis increases the risk of conditions necessitating anticoagulation, but also increases the risk of bleeding, complicating anticoagulation use. Traditionally, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) have been used in this patient population. However, VKA use can be complicated due to difficulty monitoring in the context of synthetic dysfunction and baseline INR abnormalities. DOACs have emerged as alternative agents, with less proposed reliance on hepatic elimination. Apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban and dabigatran are eliminated by the liver at 75%, 65%, 50% and 20% respectively. However, safety data on DOACs in cirrhosis patients is limited due to historic exclusion from larger trials. Patients with severe Child-Pugh (CP) classes are notably underrepresented in major trials. Various guidelines currently classify CP class C (and sometimes B) as contraindications to DOACs. Methods A literature search of MEDLINE and Embase from inception to Jan 2023 identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing DOACs to LMWH/VKA in cirrhosis patients. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data at title, abstract, and full-text. Patient characteristics, CP class, and anticoagulation regimens were extracted. The primary outcome was major bleeding per ISTH criteria. Secondary outcomes include clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) and minor bleeding per ISTH criteria as a composite outcome, VTE incidence, and arterial thromboembolism (ATE) incidence. Results were stratified into two subgroups: CP B&C Exclusive, and CP Unspecified (primary study did not report or stratify by CP class). A meta-analysis was conducted using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model and presented as odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Of 794 articles screened, 21 articles (2 RCTs, 1 prospective cohort, 13 retrospective cohorts, 5 abstracts) were included for analysis (n = 5738). Overall, DOACs were associated with a lower risk of major bleeding compared to controls (OR=0.63 [0.45, 0.89], p<0.01). This result was consistent in the CP B&C Exclusive subgroup (OR=0.42 [0.29, 0.62], p<0.01, 5 studies) but not in the CP Unspecified subgroup (OR=0.71 [0.48, 1.08], p=0.11, 13 studies). One large study (n=3213), Lawal 2023, weighed 20.1% in the CP B&C Exclusive group, favoured DOACs in reduction of major bleeding (OR=0.37, 95%CI [0.24,0.57]). Removal of this study in a post-hoc sensitivity analysis led to no differences in major bleeding in the CP B&C subgroup (OR=0.79, 95%CI [0.31,1.97]), CP Unspecified subgroup (OR=0.71, 95%CI [0.48,1.08]), or overall bleeding (OR=0.75, 95%CI [0.55,1.03]). For CRNMB and minor bleeding, DOACs did not differ from control overall or in any subgroups. DOACs significantly reduced the risk of VTE in the CP Unspecified subgroup and overall. The difference in VTE incidence was non-significant in the CP B&C Exclusive subgroup, however the analysis only had two studies. The difference in ATE incidence in the overall sample and all subgroups was non-significant. Conclusion In this analysis comparing DOACs to LMWH/VKAs in patients with liver cirrhosis, DOACs were associated with a statistically significant reduction in the risk of major bleeding overall and in the more advanced subgroups (CP B&C). The association between DOACs and the risk of CRNMB and minor bleeding was non-significant. Patients using DOACs had lower VTE incidence compared to those using LMWH/VKA, with no difference in ATE incidence. Limitations include the inability to stratify CP class B and C due to limited CP class C evidence, reducing confidence in our ability to differentiate a differing effect in these two groups. Furthermore, a single large study (Lawal 2023), heavily influenced the major bleeding outcome; its removal shifted the conclusion from favouring DOACs to non-significant differences. Nevertheless, these results provide reassurance on the safety profile of DOACs in comparison to LMWH/VKA in patients with cirrhosis, particularly in those with moderate to severe liver cirrhosis, a population of clinical uncertainty. There is no concerning evidence for future trials, which are much needed, to include this population.

Pulmonary Embolism and the Impact of Concomitant Deep Vein Thrombosis on Outcomes Among Cancer Patients

Intro: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of death among cancer patients, second only to cancer progression. Identifying factors predicting worse outcomes among cancer patients with VTE would be useful clinically. For cancer patients with pulmonary emboli (PE), it remains unclear whether concomitant leg deep vein thrombosis (DVT) as a source for further embolization adversely impacts this risk. The aim of this project was to determine the impact of residual DVT on adverse outcomes among cancer patients suffering acute PE. Methods: Consecutive patients with confirmed acute PE (March 1, 2013 - June 30, 2021) underwent ultrasound (US) imaging and were divided into two groups depending on the presence or absence of leg DVT. PE severity was classified based on AHA criteria. Patients were followed prospectively for VTE recurrence, major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) and all-cause mortality. Results: Over the study interval, 1,035 cancer patients with PE were enrolled (Table 1). Of these, 375 (36.2%) had leg DVT confirmed by US. Patients with leg DVT were older (64.2 vs 61.4 years, p = 0.01), heavier (90.2 vs 85.1 kg, p <0.001), with lower metastatic disease prevalence (49.1% vs 57.1%, p = 0.01) compared to those without leg DVT. Cancer type distribution also differed between groups. PE patients with DVT more often had prostate, genitourinary, and hematologic cancers while those without DVT more often had pancreatic and breast cancers. Patients with DVT more often had symptomatic PE (48.2% vs. 35.9%, p < 0.001), massive (2.9% vs 0.5%, p < 0.001), and submassive (22.0% vs 7.6%, p < 0.001). Patients with DVT more often received unfractionated heparin (39.5% vs 18.7%, p < 0.001) whereas those without DVT were more frequently treated with low molecular weight heparin (57.5% vs. 44.3%, p <0.001), and apixaban (16.4% vs. 11.7%, p < 0.05). Anticoagulant duration, VTE recurrence, major bleeding and CRNMB were similar between groups (Table 2). Conclusion: Among a large cohort of cancer patients with pulmonary emboli, significant clinical and cancer specific differences exist comparing those with and without leg DVT.While theoretically increasing the risk of recurrent embolization, the presence of residual DVT does not appear to adversely impact important outcomes among cancer patients adequately treated with anticoagulation.

Venous Thromboembolism Outcomes Among Cancer and Non-Cancer Patients Managed with Patient-Centric Guideline-Driven Protocol

Purpose/Introduction: Patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) have higher complication rates including thrombosis recurrence and bleeding. Real world prospective clinical outcome estimates of VTE management comparing cancer and non-cancer patients are limited. To assess VTE recurrence, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) in patients with cancer and without cancer, the prospective Mayo Clinic Thrombophilia Clinic Registry was analyzed. Methods: Upon recruitment, consecutive patients with confirmed acute VTE (03/01/2013 - 04/30/2023) were treated in a standardized, guideline-sanctioned, protocol driven strategy incorporating shared patient-decision making. Patients were divided into groups based on cancer status. After enrollment, patients were actively followed at 3 month intervals, in person whenever feasible, by mailed questionnaire or scripted phone interview to assess vital status, medication compliance, VTE recurrence, major bleeding and CRNMB. Results: Over the study time-frame, 2,064 patients (53.8% male, 46.2% female) with a cancer and 2,647 patients (54.9% male, 45.1% female) without cancer were enrolled. The most common cancers were gastrointestinal (n=423, 20.5%), pancreatic (n=287, 13.9%), genitourinary (n=198, 9.6%), hematologic (n=171, 8.3%), and lung cancer (n=170, 8.2%). Patients with cancer were older, had lower weight and lower platelet counts compared to non-cancer patients (Table1). Pulmonary embolism (PE, 52.6% vs 43.7%, p<0.001), upper extremity DVT (9.1% vs 6.0%, p<0.001), and splanchnic DVT (11.1% vs 6.9%, p<0.001) were more frequent among cancer patients. In contrast, leg DVT was more frequent among non-cancer patients (65.4% vs.47.2%, p<0.001). While mean duration of anticoagulation was similar between groups, notable differences in 3 month and > 9 month durations were evident as were initial anticoagulant choices (Table 1). Despite a well-organized protocol driven and guideline sanctioned management strategy, patients with active cancer experienced a 2.2-fold higher rate of VTE recurrence (p<0.001) and a 1.8 fold higher rate of major bleeding (p<001) compared to non-cancer patients (Table 2). CRNMB rates did not differ by cancer status. Conclusions: In this large prospective, guideline-driven and patient-centric registry of VTE management, patients with cancer had significantly higher rate of VTE recurrence and major bleeding, compared to non-cancer patients. These data provide important estimates for power calculations for future randomized trials of VTE treatment.

Extended Full Dose Versus Low Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Cancer and Overweight Patients

Background: Reduced or low-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been studied in randomized control trials for the extended prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after 6 months of treatment at full, therapeutic doses. The real-world effectiveness as well as utilization of this approach in clinical practice compared to continuing at therapeutic doses is unclear. Aims: Examine the effectiveness, safety and utilization of reduced-dose DOACs in cancer patients and overweight patients. Methods: Consecutive patients with VTE were identified using the Mayo Clinic VTE Registry from March 1st, 2013 to December 31st, 2021. Patients were followed prospectively for outcomes of VTE recurrence, death, major bleeding and clinically relevant non major bleeding (CRNMB) either in person or by survey. Patients with recurrent VTE or bleeding during the first 3 months were excluded from further analysis. After completion of anticoagulation treatment for 3 months with either rivaroxaban or apixaban, patients continuing anticoagulation were evaluated in a nested case-control study. Results: A total of 404 patients (283 (70%) on apixaban and 121 (30%) on rivaroxaban) were identified in the low dose DOAC and 3060 in the full dose anticoagulation group. Overall, the mean age was 60.7 years (SD 14.4), mean weight was 89.9 kg (SD 23.8) and 55.1% were males. Within the full cohort, patients with active cancer were less likely to be prescribed low dose DOACs (HR 0.56; 95%CI 0.42-0.73; p<0.001). However, low dose DOAC prescription was more likely in patients with pulmonary embolism alone (HR 1.48; 95%CI 1.21-1.80; p<0.001) or in combination with DVT (HR 1.54; 95%CI 1.25,1.90; p<0.001). Patients transitioned to low dose DOACs had similar age, sex and weight compared to the full dose anticoagulation group, however, fewer patients with weight ≥120 kg had reduced dosing (HR 0.68; 95%CI 0.46,0.99; p=0.046). The mean time to start of a low dose DOAC was 5.1 months overall, 5.4 months in cancer patients, and 3.6-4.9 months in non-cancer patients (Table 1). Non-cancer patients had significantly lower transition numbers in those ≥120kg (HR 0.62; 95%CI 0.40,0.97; p=0.038). In non-cancer patients In comparing weight, ≥120kg to <120kg, in the low dose group, only death was statistically different with higher risk in those ≥120kg (HR 6.44; 95%CI1.27,32.81; p=0.025). Cancer patients transitioned to low dose DOACs around 5 months on average with a median of 3.3 months. Apixaban continued to be the dominant DOAC used (78%) in the low dose group. The cancers with the most patients on low dose DOACs include lymphoma, prostate, melanoma, ovarian, and breast. There was no significant difference in VTE recurrence or death in the cancer group on different DOAC doses. Conclusion: Our results show that anticoagulant prescribers are not always waiting until 6 months to transition to low doses and low doses are being utilized in cancer patients despite lack of cancer-specific studies during the analyzed time period. Although the sample size limits the precision of this analysis, we did not find statistically significant increases in VTE recurrence with low dose DOACs in either cancer patients or with elevated body weight. We did find CRNMB but not MB was observed more frequently in weights above 120kg, possibly from unadjusted confounding in this unadjusted analysis.

Efficacy and Safety of Extended Duration Postoperative Thromboprophylaxis with Low-Molecular-Weight-Heparin Among Subgroups of Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the Periop-01 Trial

Background: Clinical practice guidelines suggest the use of extended duration of postoperative thromboprophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications after any cancer-related major abdominal or pelvic surgeries. However, recent trials including patients undergoing surgical resection of colorectal cancer have reported relatively low rates of symptomatic VTE. Hence, the risk and benefits of extended postoperative thromboprophylaxis need to be carefully assessed in this patient population. We sought to determine the impact of extended duration thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight-heparin on VTE and bleeding events among different subgroups of patients undergoing surgical resection of localized colorectal cancer. Methods: This is a pre-planned post-hoc analysis of the PERIOP-01 randomized controlled trial which compared extended (up to 6 weeks) to standard duration (in hospital only) of perioperative thromboprophylaxis with tinzaparin (4500 IU SC daily) in patients undergoing surgical resection of localized colorectal cancer. Subgroup analyses were performed based on different baseline characteristics. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were objectively documented major VTE and combination of major bleeding (MB) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) events, respectively. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model to compare the treatment effect accounting for clustering at study center level. Results: A total of 614 patients were randomized in the PERIOP-01 trial (307 in the extended and 307 in the standard duration thromboprophylaxis groups). Overall, the mean age of the participants was 61 years, 41% of them were women, and most patients were white (90%). Type of primary cancer was well-balanced with 311 patients having rectal cancer (51%), whereas 303 (49%) had primary colon cancer. During the study period, major VTE events occurred in 2% and 1% of the extended- and standard-duration prophylaxis groups, respectively (P=0.8). Combination of MB and CRNMB events occurred in 3% of each group. No specific characteristics were found to be associated with a decreased risk of major VTE among patients on extended duration thromboprophylaxis (Figure 1). Patients with colon cancer resection receiving extended thromboprophylaxis were at an increased risk of bleeding complication compared to patients with rectal cancer (HR 2.57, 95%CI 1.25-5.3) (Figure 1). Other characteristics that may be associated with an increased risk of bleeding among patient on extended thromboprophylaxis included age >= 75 (HR 2.37, 95%CI 0.47-11.98) and male sex (HR 2.13, 95%CI 0.2-23.17), although these characteristics were not statistically significant. Conclusions: In the PERIOP-01 trial, extended thromboprophylaxis didn't reduce the risk of major VTE in any subgroups of patients. On the other hand, extended duration of thromboprophylaxis may be associated with an increased bleeding risk among male, elderly patients, and those with colon cancer.

Direct oral anticoagulants and the risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients with different body weight categories: a large hospital-based study

ObjectiveThrough predictable pharmacokinetics—including a convenient fixed-dose regimen, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred over previous treatments in anticoagulation for various indications. However, the association between higher body weight and the risk of adverse consequences is not well studied among DOAC users. We aim to explore the association of body weight and adverse clinical outcomes in DOAC users.MethodsA total of 97,413 anonymised DOAC users in a tertiary care setting were identified following structured queries on the electronic health records (EHRs) to extract the feature-rich anonymised dataset. The prepared dataset was analysed, and the features identified with machine learning (ML) informed the adjustments of covariates in the multivariate regression analysis to examine the association. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the mortality benefits of DOACs.ResultsAmong DOAC users, the odds of adverse clinical outcomes, such as clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), ischaemic stroke, all-cause mortality, and prolonged hospital stay, were lower in patients with overweight, obesity, or morbid obesity than in patients with normal body weight. The odds of ischaemic stroke (OR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.36–0.88, p = 0.001) and all-cause mortality (OR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.81–0.95, p = 0.001) were lower in patients with morbid obesity than in patients with normal body weight. In the Kaplan–Meier analysis, apixaban was associated with a significantly lower rate of mortality overall and in obesity and overweight subgroups than other DOACs (p < 0.001). However, rivaroxaban performed better than apixaban in the morbid obesity subgroup (p < 0.001).ConclusionThis study shows the positive effects of DOAC therapy on clinical outcomes, particularly in patients with high body weight. However, this still needs validation by further studies particularly among patients with morbid obesity.

Apixaban versus no anticoagulation for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or lymphoma (PREVAPIX-ALL): a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial

Paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or lymphoma are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism resulting in increased mortality and morbidity. We hypothesised that apixaban, a direct oral anticoagulant, would safely reduce venous thromboembolism in this patient population. PREVAPIX-ALL was a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial conducted in 74 paediatric hospitals in 9 countries. Participants aged 1 year or older to younger than 18 years with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (pre-B cell or T cell) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (B cell or T cell immunophenotype) and a central venous line in place throughout induction were randomly assigned 1:1 to standard of care (SOC, ie, no systemic anticoagulation) or weight-adjusted twice-daily apixaban during induction. Randomisation was performed centrally and stratified by age (those <10 years or those ≥10 years). Participants weighing 35 kg or less were administered 2·5 mg twice daily of apixaban as a 2·5 mg tablet, 0·5 mg tablets, or 0·4 mg/mL oral solution, while those weighing more than 35 kg were administered weight-adjusted prophylactic doses using 0·5 mg tablets or the 0·4 mg/mL oral solution twice daily. Primary outcomes were assessed by a blinded central adjudication committee. The primary efficacy outcome for the intention to treat population was the composite of symptomatic or clinically unsuspected venous thromboembolism, the primary safety outcome was major bleeding, and secondary safety outcomes included clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. Patients were screened for venous thromboembolism by ultrasound and echocardiogram at the end of induction. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02369653) and is now complete. Between Oct 22, 2015, and June 4, 2021, 512 participants were randomly assigned and included in analyses (222 [43%] female and 290 [57%] male; 388 [76%] White, 52 [10%] Asian, 24 [5%] Black or African American, and 48 [9%] other races; and 122 [24%] Hispanic or Latino ethnicity). During a median follow-up period of 27 days (IQR 26-28), 31 (12%) of 256 patients on apixaban had a composite venous thromboembolism compared with 45 (18%) of 256 participants receiving SOC (relative risk [RR] 0·69, 95% CI 0·45-1·05; p=0·080). Two major bleeding events occurred in each group (RR 1·0, 95% CI 0·14-7·01; p=1·0). A higher incidence of CRNM bleeding, primarily grade 1 or 2 epistaxis, occurred in the apixaban group (11 [4%] of 256 participants) compared with the SOC group (3 [1%] of 256; RR 3·67, 95% CI 1·04-12·97, p=0·030). The most frequent grade 3-5 adverse events in both groups were thrombocytopenia (n=28 for the apixaban group and n=20 for the SOC group) or platelet count decreased (n=49 and n=45), anaemia (n=77 and n=74), febrile neutropenia (n=27 and n=20), and neutropenia (n=16 and n=17) or neutrophil count decreased (n=22 and n=25). Five deaths occurred, which were due to infection (n=3 in the SOC group), cardiac arrest (n=1 in apixaban group), and haemorrhagic cerebral sinus vein thrombosis (n=1 in the SOC group). There was one apixaban-related death (coagulopathy and haemorrhage after cardiac arrest of unknown cause). PREVAPIX-ALL is, to our knowledge, the first trial assessing primary thromboprophylaxis using a direct oral anticoagulant in paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or lymphoma. No statistically significant treatment benefit was identified in participants receiving apixaban. Major and CRNM bleeding were infrequent overall, but a higher incidence of CRNM bleeding (primarily epistaxis in younger children) occurred in participants receiving apixaban. For patients deemed to be at particularly high risk of thrombosis, PREVAPIX-ALL provides encouraging safety data for the use of apixaban in clinical settings in which the potential benefits are thought to outweigh the risk of bleeding. Bristol Myers Squibb-Pfizer Alliance.

Efficiency and safety of dual pathway inhibition for the prevention of femoropopliteal artery restenosis in repeated endovascular interventions

ObjectiveThere is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal strategy for evaluating the efficiency and safety of dual-pathway inhibition (DPI) in preventing femoropopliteal restenosis in patients undergoing repeated endovascular interventions. Despite several therapeutic interventions available for preventing femoropopliteal restenosis post repeated endovascular interventions, the ideal strategy, particularly evaluating the efficacy and safety of DPI, remains a matter of debate. MethodsFrom January 2015 to September 2021, patients who underwent repeated endovascular interventions for femoropopliteal restenosis were compared with those who underwent DPI or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after surgery using a propensity score-matched analysis. The primary outcome was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). The principal safety outcome was a composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. To further enhance the rigor, Kaplan-Meier plots, Cox proportional hazards modeling, and sensitivity analyses, as well as subgroup analyses were employed, reducing potential confounders. ResultsA total of 441 patients were included in our study, of whom 294 (66.7%) received DAPT and 147 (33.1%) received DPI, with 114 matched pairs (mean age, 72.21 years; 84.2% male). Cumulative probability of CD-TLR at 36 months in the DPI group (17%) trended lower than that in the DAPT group (32%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.78; P =.004). The cumulative probability of freedom from CD-TLR at 36 months in the DPI group was 83%. No significant difference was observed in the composite outcome of major or CRNM bleeding between the DPI and DAPT groups (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.34 to 4.69; P = .730). The DPI group was associated with significantly lower rates of CD-TLR in the main subgroup analyses of diabetes (P = .001), previous smoking history (P = .008), longer lesion length (>10 cm) (P = .003), and treatment with debulking strategy (P = .003). ConclusionsIn our investigation focused on CD-TLR, we found that DPI exhibited a significant reduction in the risk of reintervention compared with other treatment modalities. This underscores the potential of DPI as a viable therapeutic strategy in preventing reinterventions. Moreover, our assessment of safety outcomes revealed that the bleeding risks associated with DPI were on par with DAPT, thereby not compromising patient safety. These findings pave the way for potential broader clinical implications, emphasizing the effectiveness and safety of DPI in the context of reducing reintervention risks.