Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials Research Articles

Machine learning prediction and explanatory models of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tofacitinib

BackgroundPatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased risk of developing serious infections (SIs) vs. individuals without RA; efforts to predict SIs in this patient group are ongoing. We assessed the ability of different machine learning modeling approaches to predict SIs using baseline data from the tofacitinib RA clinical trials program.MethodsThis analysis included data from 19 clinical trials (phase 2, n = 10; phase 3, n = 6; phase 3b/4, n = 3). Patients with RA receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) were included in the analysis; patients receiving tofacitinib 11 mg once daily were considered as tofacitinib 5 mg BID. All available patient-level baseline variables were extracted. Statistical and machine learning methods (logistic regression, support vector machines with linear kernel, random forest, extreme gradient boosting trees, and boosted trees) were implemented to assess the association of baseline variables with SI (logistic regression only), and to predict SI using selected baseline variables using 5-fold cross-validation. Missing values were handled individually per prediction model.ResultsA total of 8404 patients with RA treated with tofacitinib were eligible for inclusion (15,310 patient-years of total follow-up) of which 473 patients reported SIs. Amongst other baseline factors, age, previous infection, and corticosteroid use were significantly associated with SI. When applying prediction modeling for SI across data from all studies, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve ranged from 0.656 to 0.739. AUROC values ranged from 0.599 to 0.730 in data from phase 3 and 3b/4 studies, and from 0.563 to 0.643 in data from ORAL Surveillance only.ConclusionsBaseline factors associated with SIs in the tofacitinib RA clinical trial program were similar to established SI risk factors associated with advanced treatments for RA. Furthermore, while model performance in predicting SI was similar to other published models, this did not meet the threshold for accurate prediction (AUROC > 0.85). Thus, predicting the occurrence of SIs at baseline remains challenging and may be complicated by the changing disease course of RA over time. Inclusion of other patient-associated and healthcare delivery-related factors and harmonization of the duration of studies included in the models may be required to improve prediction.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00147498; NCT00413660; NCT00550446; NCT00603512; NCT00687193; NCT01164579; NCT00976599; NCT01059864; NCT01359150; NCT02147587; NCT00960440; NCT00847613; NCT00814307; NCT00856544; NCT00853385; NCT01039688; NCT02187055; NCT02831855; NCT02092467.

Effect of using the Simple Erosion Narrowing Score or Sharp/van der Heijde score on power of rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials to detect differences in radiographic progression.

The Simple Erosion Narrowing Score (SENS) is a simplification of the Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS). Previous studies found SENS and SHS to have very similar measurement properties, but suggest that SENS has a lower discriminative ability that may result in reduced power. Therefore, we aimed to quantify the effect of using SENS rather than SHS on the power to show between-group differences in radiographic progression. Using data from two clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (DRESS and BeSt), SENS was derived from the SHS. Criterion validity of the SENS in relation to the SHS was assessed by calculating the Spearman correlation. The power of both scores to show a difference between groups was compared using bootstrapping to generate 10.000 replications of each study. Then, the number of replications with a significant difference in progression (using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline scores) were compared. Correlations between SENS and SHS were all >0.9, indicating high criterion validity of SENS compared with SHS as a reference standard. There was one exception, the DRESS study showed a somewhat lower correlation for the change score at 18 months (0.787). The loss in power of SENS over SHS was limited to at most 19% (BeSt year 5). In addition, the difference in power between SENS and SHS is smaller at higher levels of power. SENS appears to be a reasonable alternative to SHS, with only a limited loss of power to show between-group differences in radiographic progression.

Digital health technologies and machine learning augment patient reported outcomes to remotely characterise rheumatoid arthritis

Digital measures of health status captured during daily life could greatly augment current in-clinic assessments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), to enable better assessment of disease progression and impact. This work presents results from weaRAble-PRO, a 14-day observational study, which aimed to investigate how digital health technologies (DHT), such as smartphones and wearables, could augment patient reported outcomes (PRO) to determine RA status and severity in a study of 30 moderate-to-severe RA patients, compared to 30 matched healthy controls (HC). Sensor-based measures of health status, mobility, dexterity, fatigue, and other RA specific symptoms were extracted from daily iPhone guided tests (GT), as well as actigraphy and heart rate sensor data, which was passively recorded from patients’ Apple smartwatch continuously over the study duration. We subsequently developed a machine learning (ML) framework to distinguish RA status and to estimate RA severity. It was found that daily wearable sensor-outcomes robustly distinguished RA from HC participants (F1, 0.807). Furthermore, by day 7 of the study (half-way), a sufficient volume of data had been collected to reliably capture the characteristics of RA participants. In addition, we observed that the detection of RA severity levels could be improved by augmenting standard patient reported outcomes with sensor-based features (F1, 0.833) in comparison to using PRO assessments alone (F1, 0.759), and that the combination of modalities could reliability measure continuous RA severity, as determined by the clinician-assessed RAPID-3 score at baseline (r2, 0.692; RMSE, 1.33). The ability to measure the impact of the disease during daily life—through objective and remote digital outcomes—paves the way forward to enable the development of more patient-centric and personalised measurements for use in RA clinical trials.

Abatacept and non-melanoma skin cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comprehensive evaluation of randomised controlled trials and observational studies

ObjectivesThis study aims to evaluate non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) risk associated with abatacept treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsThis evaluation included 16 abatacept RA clinical trials and 6 observational studies. NMSC...

Impact of Upadacitinib on Laboratory Parameters and Related Adverse Events in Patients with RA: Integrated Data Up to 6.5 Years.

Upadacitinib (UPA) is a Janus kinase inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy in moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an acceptable safety profile. We investigated laboratory parameter changes in UPA RA clinical trials. Pooled data from six randomized trials in the SELECT phase 3 program were included. Key laboratory parameters and safety data were measured for UPA 15 and 30mg once daily (QD), adalimumab (ADA) 40mg every other week + methotrexate (MTX), and MTX monotherapy. Exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs) of adverse events were calculated. A total of 3209 patients receiving UPA 15 mg QD (10 782.7 patient-years [PY]), 1204 patients receiving UPA 30mg QD (3162.5 PY), 579 patients receiving ADA + MTX (1573.2 PY), and 314 patients receiving MTX monotherapy (865.1 PY) were included, representing up to 6.5years of total exposure. Decreases in mean levels of hemoglobin, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, and increases in mean levels of liver enzymes and creatinine phosphokinase were observed with UPA, with grade 3 or 4 changes observed in some patients. Mean low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratios remained stable for patients receiving UPA 15 mg QD. EAERs of anemia and neutropenia occurred at generally consistent rates between UPA and active comparators (3.1-4.3 and 1.7-5.0 events [E]/100 PY across treatment groups, respectively). Rates of hepatic disorder were higher with MTX monotherapy, UPA 15mg and UPA 30mg (10.8, 9.7, and 11.0 E/100 PY, respectively) versus ADA + MTX (6.4 E/100 PY). Rates of lymphopenia were highest with MTX monotherapy (3.2 E/100 PY). Treatment discontinuations due to laboratory-related events were rare, occurring in 1.1% and 2.2% of patients treated with UPA 15 and 30mg QD, respectively. The results of this integrated long-term analysis of laboratory parameters continue to support an acceptable safety profile of UPA 15 mg QD for moderate-to-severe RA.

Lentiviral Production Platform.

Lentiviral-mediated transfection technique is a powerful tool for gene modification in preclinical studies. By using this technique, the desired gene modification can be achieved easily in immune cells, nondividing, and terminally differentiated cells, including hematopoietic stem cells, neurons, and even tumor cells, which other viral vectors cannot do. The main considerations of therapeutic gene delivery using a lentiviral system are the risk of insertional mutagenesis and the immune reaction elicited by infected cells. Although some biosafety concerns need to be addressed before clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis, the lentiviral system targeting therapeutic targets has been widely used for in vivo gene transfer in animal models. In this chapter, the protocols for production of viral particles and viral concentration are provided. As an alternative utilization, this lentiviral production platform could also be employed to produce a pseudotype severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 in which the spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 was incorporated into pseudovirions for viral study.

Genicular artery embolization for knee osteoarthritis: Results of the LipioJoint-1 trial

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transient genicular artery embolization (GAE) using an ethiodized oil-based emulsion for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Materials and methodsThis prospective, single-arm, open-label, multicenter, first-in-human cohort trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04733092). The main inclusion criterion was diagnosis of KOA according to a visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score ≥ 40 mm (score range: 0–100 mm), despite conservative treatment for at least three months. Treatment efficacy was assessed using changes in VAS pain score, Mean Western Ontario & McMaster Universities osteoarthritis (WOMAC) function score (normalized to 100; score ranging from 0 to100) and outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials (OMERACT)-Osteoarthritis Research Society (OARSI) set of responder criteria. ResultsTwenty-two consecutive participants (13 women; mean age, 66 ± 9 [standard deviation (SD)]) were included and underwent GAE. Emulsion consisted in a mixture of ioversol and ethiodized oil (ratio 1:3, respectively) prepared extemporaneously. The rate of serious adverse events attributed to GAE within one month was 5% (1/22), corresponding to reversible worsening of renal function. Immediate technical success rate was 100%. Mean VAS pain score dropped from 74.4 ± 16.5 (SD) mm at baseline to 37.2 ± 26.7 (SD) mm at three months (P < 0.001). Mean WOMAC function score (normalized to 100: score ranging from 0 to 100) decreased from 57.3 ± 17.1 (SD) at baseline to 33.5 ± 25.9 (SD) at three months (P < 0.001). At three months, 16 out of 22 participants (73%) were considered responders according to the OMERACT-OARSI set of responder criteria, including high improvement in either pain or WOMAC function, or improvement in both pain and WOMAC function. ConclusionGAE using an ethiodized oil-based emulsion is safe and improves pain and function in participants with KOA for at least three months.

Malignancy in the Upadacitinib Clinical Trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, and Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis.

This article aims to describe malignancies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), or non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) treated with upadacitinib (UPA) or active comparators. This integrated safety analysis includes data from 11 phase3 UPA trials across RA (6 trials), PsA (2 trials), AS (2 trials; one phase2b/3), and nr-axSpA (1 trial). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were summarized for RA (pooled UPA 15mg [UPA15], pooled UPA 30mg [UPA30], adalimumab 40mg [ADA], methotrexate monotherapy [MTX]), PsA (pooled UPA15, pooled UPA30, ADA), AS (pooled UPA15), and nr-axSpA (UPA15). TEAEs were reported as exposure-adjusted event rates (events/100 patient-years). Median treatment duration ranged from 1.0 to 4.0years (with a maximum of 6.6years in RA). Across treatments and indications, rates of malignancy excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) ranged from 0.2 to 1.1, while NMSC ranged from 0.0 to 1.4. In RA, rates of malignancy excluding NMSC were generally similar between UPA15, UPA30, ADA, and MTX (breast and lung cancer were the most common). In RA and PsA, Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed no differences in event onset of malignancy excluding NMSC with UPA15 versus UPA30 over time. In RA, NMSC rates were higher with UPA30 than UPA15; both UPA15 and UPA30 were higher than ADA and MTX. In PsA, rates of malignancy excluding NMSC and NMSC were generally similar between UPA15, UPA30, and ADA. In AS and nr-axSpA, malignancies were reported infrequently. Few events of lymphoma were reported across the clinical programs. Rates of malignancy excluding NMSC were generally similar between UPA15, UPA30, ADA, and MTX and were consistent across RA, PsA, AS, and nr-axSpA. A dose-dependent increased rate of NMSC was observed with UPA in RA. ClinicaTrials.gov identifier: NCT02706873, NCT02675426, NCT02629159, NCT02706951, NCT02706847, NCT03086343, NCT03104400, NCT03104374, NCT03178487, and NCT04169373.

MACE and VTE across upadacitinib clinical trial programmes in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis

ObjectivesTo provide an integrated analysis of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and events of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and associated risk factors across rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing...

Magnetic resonance imaging RAMRIS-SAFE score-A low-risk effective measure of rapid response to therapy in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials.

To assess the rapidity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measured synovitis (as measured by synovial thickening using the RAMRIS-SAFE score) and bone edema in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) subjects treated with golimumab. Secondary aims: to correlate MRI measures with disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH), physician global (PhysG) and patient global (PatG) assessments. Patients with active RA and inadequate response to methotrexate were recruited. Active RA was defined as RA with a Disease Activity Score of 28 joints - C-reactive protein ≥4.2 at screening AND active disease (synovitis and edema) of the chosen hand or wrist on MRI at screening, as determined by the central blinded MRI reader (PB). Outcomes measures were assessed at baseline, 2, 6, and 12 weeks. MRI results were interpreted by one experienced observer (PB), blinded to clinical measures. Pearson's correlation co-efficient (SPSS) was used to express the relationship between DASH, PhysG, PatG and MRI measures. Eighteen patients were included in the study. All subjects completed follow-up visits and MRI assessment. Mean age was 60.6 years (range 22-72), and 10 were female, 8 male, and disease duration was mean 4.72 years (range 1-28); all patients were taking background methotrexate. The changes in MRI synovial volume were evident by visit 2. The strongest correlations with the DASH for MRI parameters were total synovial thickening (0.923) and edema (0.921). Golimumab was associated with rapid improvement in clinical measures and patient-reported outcome measures. Mean synovial thickening demonstrated early rapid improvement. MRI synovial thickening demonstrated a strong correlation with DASH, PatG and PhysG.

Protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional, longitudinal ambulatory clinical trial in rheumatoid arthritis and Parkinson’s disease patients analysing the relation between the gut microbiome, fasting and immune status in Germany (ExpoBiome)

IntroductionChronic inflammatory diseases like rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and neurodegenerative disorders like Parkinson’s disease (PD) have recently been associated with a decreased diversity in the gut microbiome, emerging as key driver...

P119 The Use of Exposure-Adjusted Event Rates versus Exposure-Adjusted Incidence Rates in Adverse Event Reporting: Insights from Filgotinib Integrated Safety Data in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Abstract Background/Aims Reporting of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trials can be summarized as exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) or exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs). Censored EAIR (EAIR), weighing exposure up to a patient’s first event, is commonly reported; uncensored EAIR (EAIRu), using total exposure time for all patients, can also be used. For EAIR, exposure time can vary by event. In contrast to EAIR(u), the total number of events are used to calculate EAER. The three methods account for different exposures and/or multiple events, which can impact the outcome evaluation. Studies of filgotinib (FIL) in RA report safety data as EAIR/100 patient-years of exposure (PYE) for TEAEs, which is uncensored. Objective: To describe the outcome of long-term FIL integrated safety data in RA by applying different statistical methodologies: EAER, EAIRu and EAIR. Methods Integrated FIL safety data from seven clinical trials were assessed. Predefined adverse events of special interest (AESI) included serious infections (any), herpes zoster (HZ), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), malignancies (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer [NMSC]), NMSC and venous thromboembolism (VTE). The number of patients with an event, number of events, EAER, EAIRu and EAIR were summarized. The data extraction date was January 2021 for the DARWIN 3 (NCT02065700) long-term extension (LTE) and November 2020 for the FINCH 4 (NCT03025308) LTE. Results In total, 3691 patients received ≥1 FIL dose for 8085 PYE. In this population, 176 serious infections were reported in 137 patients, 125 HZ events were reported in 112 patients, 39 MACE were reported in 33 patients, 20 cases of VTE were reported in 15 patients, 60 malignancies excluding NMSC were reported in 49 patients and 21 cases of NMSC were reported in 20 patients. Within each treatment arm (FIL 200 mg [FIL200], FIL 100 mg [FIL100] or combined FIL), rates for most AESI were similar when reported as EAER, EAIRu or EAIR. For serious infections, EAER was higher than EAIRu or EAIR. The total exposure time to first event (censored PYE) was high and comparable to total exposure (PYE) (&amp;gt;2700 years and &amp;gt;5100 years for the total populations in the FIL100 and FIL200 groups, respectively). Conclusion These data confirm that using different methods to analyze FIL safety data (EAER, EAIRu, EAIR) does not result in different safety outcomes, reinforcing the previously reported FIL safety profile in patients with RA. As the AESI reported in the long-term safety database with FIL are rare, patients commonly have long exposure times before experiencing an event, which are often associated with end of treatment. As such, EAIRu, EAIR and EAER are similar. Disclosure P. Durez: Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Galapagos, Lilly. E. Feist: Consultancies; AbbVie, Galapagos, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sobi. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Galapagos, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis and Sobi. Grants/research support; Lilly, Pfizer and Roche. R. Blanco: Consultancies; AstraZeneca, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Roche. V. Rajendran: Other; Galapagos. N. Verbruggen: Other; Galapagos. K. Van Beneden: Shareholder/stock ownership; Galapagos. Other; Galapagos. J. Galloway: Consultancies; AbbVie, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis and Pfizer. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Biogen, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB. Grants/research support; AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Medicago, Novavax and Pfizer.

Selective Inhibition of the MK2 Pathway: Data From a Phase IIa Randomized Clinical Trial in Rheumatoid Arthritis

The study objective was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of ATI-450 with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A parallel-assignment, placebo-controlled, investigator-blinded/patient-blinded multicenter study evaluated patients with moderate-to-severe RA aged 18 to 70 years. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to ATI-450 50-mg oral tablets twice daily or placebo with a stable weekly dose of methotrexate for 12 weeks. The primary objective was to assess ATI-450 safety and tolerability. The secondary objectives were to assess the median percentage change from baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels, the mean change from baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on CRP level (DAS28-CRP) and Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score hand-wrist assessments of synovitis or bone erosion at week 12, and the proportion of patients with American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 (ACR 20/50/70) and with DAS28-CRP scores of less than 2.6. The exploratory outcomes were change from baseline in endogenous and ex vivo-stimulated cytokine levels. ATI-450 was well tolerated with no severe adverse events reported. ATI-450 reduced median hs-CRP levels by 42% or more at all posttreatment timepoints. In the ATI-450 group, a mean (median) decrease in DAS28-CRP score of 2.0 (2.1) was observed at week 12; proportions of patients with an ACR 20/50/70 response in the per-protocol population were 60%, 33%, and 20%, respectively, at week 12. Endogenous plasma levels of key inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor α, macrophage inflammatory protein 1β, interleukin 6, interleukin 8) were reduced across the 12 treatment weeks. This is the first clinical study demonstrating that selective mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-activated protein kinase 2 (MK2) pathway blockade leads to a sustained antiinflammatory effect. This suggests that targeting the MK2 pathway mitigates the tachyphylaxis observed with p38 MAPK inhibitors in RA and supports further exploration.

Individual patient data meta-analysis on continued use of glucocorticoids after their initiation as bridging therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

ObjectivesTo investigate whether patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can discontinue glucocorticoids (GC) after GC ‘bridging’ in the initial treatment step and to identify factors that may affect this.MethodsData from 7...

Salivary gland ultrasound is associated with the presence of autoantibodies in patients with Sjögren's syndrome: A Danish single-centre study.

To investigate whether ultrasound findings of major salivary glands are correlated with serological markers, autoantibodies, patient- or doctor-reported disease activity in a Danish cohort of patients with primary Sjögren's Syndrome (pSS). In all, 49 patients at Odense University Hospital with pSS diagnosed according to the 2002 American-European Consensus Group (AECG) classification criteria were included. Patients were characterized using the EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI, score of systemic complications) and EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI), serologic markers, Schirmer's test and salivary test. Salivary gland ultrasound (SGUS) was performed of the submandibular and parotid glands and scored according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) semi-quantitative scoring system. More patients with abnormal SGUS had antinuclear antibodies (ANA) (p = 0.002), anti-Ro52 (p = 0.001), anti-Ro60 (p<0.001), anti-La (p<0.001) and IgM-RF (p<0.001). Titers for ANA (p = 0.02) and anti-Ro52 (p = 0.03) were higher in patients with abnormal SGUS. Twenty-three of the pSS patients had no pathological findings on SGUS. There was no correlation between SGUS severity and ESSDAI- or ESSPRI-scores. Abnormal SGUS findings are associated with autoantibodies of high specificity for pSS but not with ESSDAI, ESSPRI or inflammatory markers.

Long-term passages of human clonal mesenchymal stromal cells can alleviate the disease in the rat model of collagen-induced arthritis resembling early passages of different heterogeneous cells.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease of unknown cause. The interaction of immune system cells and the secretion of inflammatory cytokines with synovial cells leads to severe inflammation in the affected joints. Currently, medications, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, and more recently, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, are used to reduce inflammation. However, long-term use of these drugs causes adverse effects or resistance in a considerable number of RA patients. Recent findings revealed the safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs)-based therapies both in RA animal models and clinical trials. Here, the beneficial effects of bone marrow-derived heterogeneous MSCs (BM-hMSCs) and Wharton jelly-derived MSCs (WJ-MSCs) at early passages were compared to BM-derived clonal MSCs (BM-cMSCs) at high passage number on a rat model of collagen-induced arthritis. Results showed that systemic delivery of MSCs significantly reversed adverse changes in body weight, paw swelling, and arthritis score in all MSC-treated groups. Radiological images and histological evaluation demonstrated the therapeutic effects of MSCs. There was a decrease in serum level of anti-collagen type II immunoglobulin G and the inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-17, and tumor necrosis factor-α in all MSC-treated groups. In contrast, an increase in inhibitory cytokines transforming growth factor-β and IL-10 was seen. Notably, the long-term passages of BM-cMSCs could alleviate RA symptoms similar to the early passages of WJ-MSCs and BM-hMSCs. The importance of BM-cMSCs is the potential to establish cell banks with billions of cells derived from a single donor that could be a competitive cell-based therapy to treat RA.

Black seed (Nigella sativa) as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis Clinical trial

Aim and Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of black seed oil on clinical symptoms and inflammatory biomarkers as an adjuvant therapy on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients taking disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs).Materials and Methods: Twenty-five RA patients were enrolled, and each received one capsule of 1000 mg black seed oil daily as adjuvant therapy with DMARDs for eight weeks. Disease activity score for 28 joints (DAS28), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and Interleukin-10 (IL-10), white blood cells (WBCs), renal function and liver function tests were assessed at baseline and at the end of the trial.Results: the results show a significant decrease in the DAS28 score and the VAS for pain in RA patients. Serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α and a number of WBCs were decreased significantly while the increment of serum levels of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was statistically non-significant. No significant changes occurred in the levels of urea, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT).Conclusion: black seed oil as an add-on therapy induced a significant improvement in clinical symptoms and inflammation of RA.

Geographic Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Global clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often do not recruit enough patients from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds to identify any potential differences in treatment outcome across such groups. To overcome this limitation, using data from five previous clinical trials and two ongoing trial extensions, this study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with RA across geographic regions. This was a post hoc, exploratory analysis of data from male and female patients with RA meeting the 2010 RA criteria as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology. Data were analyzed from phase 2 (DARWIN 1-2) and phase 3 (FINCH 1-3) clinical trials, as well as two long-term extension studies (DARWIN 3, FINCH 4), of filgotinib. Efficacy endpoints included ACR 20%/50%/70% improvement (ACR20/50/70) responses, disease activity score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein [DAS28(CRP)], Clinical Disease Activity Index scores, Boolean remission, and change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI).Safety data were presented as exposure-adjusted incidence rates per 100 patient-years of exposure of treatment-emergent adverse events. Compared with placebo, at week 12 a greater proportion of patients receiving filgotinib 200mg (FIL200) or 100mg (FIL100) achieved ACR20 (p < 0.01), with similar outcomes in most regions. Overall, the reduction in HAQ-DIwith FIL200 or FIL100was greater thanwith placebo (p < 0.05) at week 12. Compared with placebo, at week 24 the proportions of patients achieving DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2 were greater for both doses of FIL, as seen in most regions (p < 0.01). Safety outcomes did not indicate regional or ethnic differences in the safety profile of filgotinib. Filgotinib efficacy and safety in patients with RA were generally consistent across geographic regions. NCT02889796; NCT02873936; NCT02886728; NCT03025308; NCT01888874; NCT01894516; NCT02065700.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of pirfenidone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study

Interstitial lung disease is a known complication of rheumatoid arthritis, with a lifetime risk of developing the disease in any individual of 7·7%. We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of pirfenidone for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). TRAIL1 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial done in 34 academic centres specialising in interstitial lung disease in four countries (the UK, the USA, Australia, and Canada). Adults aged 18-85 years were eligible for inclusion if they met the 2010 American College of Rheumatology and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and had interstitial lung disease on a high-resolution CT scan imaging and, when available, lung biopsy. Exclusion criteria include smoking, clinical history of other known causes of interstitial lung disease, and coexistant clinically significant COPD or asthma. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 2403 mg oral pirfenidone (pirfenidone group) or placebo (placebo group) daily. The primary endpoint was the incidence of the composite endpoint of a decline from baseline in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) of 10% or more or death during the 52-week treatment period assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Key secondary endpoints included change in absolute and FVC% over 52 weeks, the proportion of patients with a decline in FVC% of 10% or more, and the frequency of progression as defined by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02808871. From May 15, 2017, to March 31, 2020, 231 patients were assessed for inclusion, of whom 123 patients were randomly assigned (63 [51%] to the pirfenidone group and 60 [49%] to the placebo group). The trial was stopped early (March 31, 2020) due to slow recruitment and the COVID-19 pandemic. The difference in the proportion of patients who met the composite primary endpoint (decline in FVC% from baseline of 10% or more or death) between the two groups was not significant (seven [11%] of 63 patients in the pirfenidone group vs nine [15%] of 60 patients in the placebo group; OR 0·67 [95% CI 0·22 to 2·03]; p=0·48). Compared with the placebo group, patients in the pirfenidone group had a slower rate of decline in lung function, measured by estimated annual change in absolute FVC (-66 vs -146; p=0·0082) and FVC% (-1·02 vs -3·21; p=0·0028). The groups were similar with regards to the decline in FVC% by 10% or more (five [8%] participants in the pirfenidone group vs seven [12%] in the placebo group; OR 0·52 [95% CI 0·14-1·90]; p=0·32) and the frequency of progression as defined by OMERACT (16 [25%] in the pirfenidone group vs 19 [32%] in the placebo group; OR 0·68 [0·30-1·54]; p=0·35). There was no significant difference in the rate of treatment-emergent serious adverse events between the two groups, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Due to early termination of the study and underpowering, the results should be interpreted with caution. Despite not meeting the composite primary endpoint, pirfenidone slowed the rate of decline of FVC over time in patients with RA-ILD. Safety in patients with RA-ILD was similar to that seen in other pirfenidone trials. Genentech.

What is the impact of sex hormones on the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis?

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common inflammatory rheumatic disease and has a female predominance of around 3:1. The relationship between sex hormones and RA has been of great interest to researchers ever since Philip Hench's observations in the 1930's regarding spontaneous disease amelioration in pregnancy. Extensive basic scientific work has demonstrated the immunomodulatory actions of sex hormones but this therapeutic potential has not to date resulted in successful clinical trials in RA. Epidemiological data regarding both endogenous and exogenous hormonal factors are inconsistent, but declining estrogen and/or progesterone levels in the menopause and post-partum appear to increase the risk and severity of RA. This review assimilates basic scientific, epidemiological and clinical trial data to provide an overview of the current understanding of the relationship between sex hormones and RA, focusing on estrogen, progesterone and androgens.