Clinical Trials Network Research Articles

A Phase 1 Study of ABI-009 (Nab-sirolimus) in Combination With Temozolomide and Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Solid Tumors, Including CNS Tumors-A Children's Oncology Group Pediatric Early Phase Clinical Trial Network Study ADVL1514.

Nab-sirolimus (ABI-009, nab-rapamycin; Aadi Bioscience Inc. [Aadi]) is a human albumin-bound form of sirolimus nanoparticles, a potent mTOR inhibitor. This phase I trial was conducted to define dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated or recommended phase II dose (MTD/RP2D), and pharmacokinetics of Nab-sirolimus in combination with temozolomide and irinotecan. Using a rolling 6 design, Nab-sirolimus was administered intravenously (IV) on days (D) 1 and 8 of cycle (C) 1. In subsequent cycles, Nab-sirolimus was administered D1 and D8 in combination with temozolomide (125 mg/m2/dose, maximum 250 mg/dose) and irinotecan (90 mg/m2/dose) orally, daily on D1-5. Cycle duration was 21 days. Three dose levels (DL) of Nab-sirolimus were investigated (DL1: 35 mg/m2/dose, DL-1: 20 mg/m2/dose, and DL-2: 15 mg/m2/dose). The observation period for estimating the MTD/RP2D was defined by cycles 1 and 2. Thirty-three patients were enrolled, 32 were eligible. Dose determination included 17 evaluable patients, median (range) age 12 (2-20) years and six additional patients were enrolled (four evaluable for toxicity) on a pharmacokinetic cohort. C1 or C2 DLTs were primarily thrombocytopenia including 2/5 patients at DL1, 2/6 patients at DL-1, and 1/6 patients at DL-2. One patient (DL1) with Ewing Sarcoma had a partial response and remained on study for 35 cycles. Rapamycin clearance was dose dependent. Irinotecan clearance and its active metabolite SN-38 exposure were not affected by coadministration with Nab-sirolimus. The MTD for Nab-sirolimus was 15 mg/m2/dose IV on D1 and D8 in combination with temozolomide 125 mg/m2/dose and oral irinotecan 90 mg/m2/dose daily for 5 days during 21D cycles. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02975882.

Representativeness of Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) trial participants

Underrepresentation by race and ethnicity in oncology clinical trials, including hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), is a known challenge. This analysis studied accrual on Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) trials conducted in 2014-20 by race/ethnicity, age, and sex comparing these characteristics with those of potentially eligible patients identified from SEER and CIBMTR databases for the disease, age, and years of interest of BMT CTN studies. Five BMT CTN trials met inclusion criteria, including one autologous and four allogeneic HCT trials. Two studies focused on multiple myeloma (BMT CTN 1302 and 1401), two studies on graft versus host disease (GVHD) treatment (BMT CTN 1301 and 1501), and one study on post-HCT maintenance therapy in FLT3+ acute myelogenous leukemia (BMT CTN 1506). A decline in the proportion of patients from minority racial and ethnic groups was seen from the SEER population to trial enrollees, with the largest drop seen between the SEER population and all patients transplanted (on or off trial) in US transplant centers. Allogeneic HCT trials which allowed alternate donor graft sources had less decrease from the SEER population. No decrease was seen in clinical trial enrollment with respect to older age and female HCT recipients. This study provides insights into the underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minority patients in BMT CTN clinical trials, largely due to lack of access to HCT in general. Pathways expanding access to donors and improving the outreach of HCT programs to underserved populations are needed to improve access to clinical trials.

Uptake of health economic evaluations alongside clinical trials in Australia: an observational study.

Australia's clinical trials sector is highly productive with continued sector investment needed to enhance research impact. Generating economic evidence alongside trials has the potential to facilitate the implementation of trial results into practice. Ascertaining the use of health economic evaluations alongside clinical trials can assist in determining whether clinical trials fully realize and operationalize their potential to change policy and practice. The aims of this study were to ascertain the uptake of health economic evaluations alongside Australian-led clinical trials and explore associations between uptake and trial characteristics. This observational study comprised a descriptive analysis of clinical trials registries, a cross-sectional survey of Australian Clinical Trials Alliance (ACTA) networks, and a subgroup analysis of completed acute care trials. Descriptive analyses of trial registrations were conducted, with logistic regressions used to identify predictors of proposing and subsequently publishing a health economic evaluation alongside acute care trials. Few randomized Australian-led clinical trials (11% of 9251) and ACTA network trials (43% of 227) proposed a health economic evaluation. In the subgroup analysis, 22% of the 324 acute care trials and 53% of the 38 ACTA network acute care trials proposed a health economic evaluation. Acute care trials funded by government bodies were significantly more likely to propose and publish a health economic evaluation than those funded by hospitals, universities, and other funders, after adjusting for phase, registration year, primary sponsor type, and comparator. Current uptake of health economic evaluations alongside Australian-led clinical trials is low, with uptake higher among the subset of ACTA network trials. This is despite economic evidence playing an increasingly prominent role in health system management, as well as rising health expenditure, limited budgets, and competing demands. There is significant opportunity to embed health economic evaluations alongside clinical trials, particularly phase 3 trials, to increase research outputs and optimize research translation. Investing in clinical trial networks that support funding for a health economist or a health economic evaluation may be an effective strategy to increase the uptake of health economic evaluations alongside trials.

Incremental eligibility criteria for the BMT CTN 1507 haploidentical trial for children with sickle cell disease

AbstractThe Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 1507 leadership and the data safety monitoring board (DSMB) established incremental entry criteria for children aged 5 to 14.99 years with sickle cell disease (SCD) enrolling in a phase 2 trial of HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. First, the enrollment was limited to overt stroke in the first 10 participants (stage 4). Subsequently, the DSMB reviewed the interim results and expanded the eligibility to include children with silent cerebral infarcts or abnormal transcranial Doppler velocities with magnetic resonance angiography–defined cerebral vasculopathy (stage 3). A third cohort was enrolled after the DSMB reviewed the clinical outcomes in these cumulative initial enrollments (n = 18). Additions to the entry criteria included nonneurologic morbidities (stage 2). Eligibility criteria included the following: (1) life-threatening acute chest syndrome requiring exchange transfusion; (2) right heart catheterization confirmed pulmonary hypertension; (3) persistent systemic hypertension despite maximum medical therapy; (4) acute pain despite maximum medical therapy in the absence of psychosocial factors and unmanaged asthma after adjudication; or (5) 2 major priapism episodes in 12 months or 3 in 24 months. Children with SCD who did not meet the criteria for stages 4, 3, and 2 were not eligible. To our knowledge, for the first time, we introduce a staged strategy for eligibility in a curative therapy trial for children with SCD concordant with 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 46.405(b). The research governance–mandated eligibility strategy used within the BMT CTN 1507 phase 2 study may apply to future pediatric SCD curative therapy trials. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT032635590.

Prenatal Substance Exposure and Infant Discharge Placement: Results From the ACT NOW Study.

It is critical that researchers gather evidence of factors that identify infants at risk of out-of-home placement based on types of substance exposures and demographic characteristics. This study applied a validated medical record data extraction tool on data derived from a multi-site (N = 30) pediatric clinical trials network (ISPCTN) study of Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal (ACT NOW study). Participants included 1808 birthing parent-infant dyads with documented NOWS scoring or prenatal opioid exposure. Non-Hispanic White pregnant persons comprised the largest proportion of the sample (69.8%), followed by Non-Hispanic Black (11.6%), Non-Hispanic Multiracial and Other race (8.5%), and Hispanic (6.2%). Most notably, infant prenatal substance exposure across alcohol, cocaine, meth/amphetamine, and opioids, had the lowest possibility of discharging to parent(s). Additionally, latent class analysis identified distinct classes of substance use during pregnancy that were associated with different probabilities of discharging to parent(s). Specifically, less than half of infants (47%-49%) in the Poly-use and Meth/amphetamine classes were discharged to their parent(s). Severity of infant withdrawal symptoms influenced placement decisions within the Poly-use and Prescription Opioid classes. Findings can inform standard practices for increasing support for pregnant persons and substance-exposed infants including identification, subsequent referrals, communication with Child Protective Services, and plans of safe care.

Variation in Opioid Agonist Dosing in Clinical Trials by Race and Ethnicity

Racial and ethnic disparities in access to treatment and quality of treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) have been identified in usual care settings. In contrast, disparities in treatment quality within clinical trials are relatively unexamined. To estimate racial and ethnic differences in the dose of opioid agonist treatment for OUD in the first 4 weeks of treatment in clinical trials. This cohort study performed analysis of the methadone and buprenorphine treatment arms of 3 trials conducted by the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network between May 2006, and January 31, 2017, at multiple Clinical Trials Network sites across the US. Trial participants who were randomized to and initiated buprenorphine or methadone treatment and who identified as Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, or non-Hispanic White were included in the present study. Data were analyzed from November 1, 2023, to August 5, 2024. Combined race and ethnicity as self-classified by the patient at trial enrollment. The maximum daily dose of buprenorphine or methadone received in each week for the first 4 weeks of treatment. The mean dose and the percentage of patients receiving a higher dose (buprenorphine ≥16 mg and methadone ≥60 mg) were compared across race and ethnicity groups. A total of 1748 patients (1263 who initiated buprenorphine and 485 who initiated methadone treatment) were included in the analysis (1168 [66.8%] male; median age, 33 [IQR, 26-45] years). Of these, 138 patients (7.9%) identified as Black, 273 (15.6%) as Hispanic, and 1337 (76.5%) as White. In week 4, Black patients received buprenorphine doses 2.5 (95% CI -4.6 to -0.5) mg lower and methadone doses 16.7 (95% CI, -30.7 to -2.7) mg lower compared with White patients, after standardizing by age and sex. In week 4, the percentage of patients receiving a higher dose of medication (buprenorphine ≥16 mg; methadone ≥60 mg) was 16.9 (95% CI, -31.9 to -1.9) points lower for Black patients compared with White patients. Hispanic and White patients received similar buprenorphine doses; Hispanic patients received lower methadone doses than White patients. In this cohort study of data from 3 clinical trials, White patients generally received higher doses of medication than Black patients. Future research is needed to understand the mechanisms of and interventions to reduce disparities in OUD treatment quality and how such disparities impact generalizability of trial results.

Markers of Maternal Bone and Renal Toxicity Through 50 Weeks Postpartum: IMPAACT 2010 (VESTED) Trial.

Safety data from randomized trials of antiretrovirals in pregnancy are scarce. We evaluated maternal bone and renal data from the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network 2010 trial, which compared the safety and efficacy of 3 antiretroviral therapy regimens started in pregnancy: dolutegravir + emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (DTG + FTC/TAF), dolutegravir + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DTG + FTC/TDF), and efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EFV/FTC/TDF). A subset of participants underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans at postpartum week 50 only. Maternal bone mineral density (BMD) Z-scores were compared between arms. Maternal creatinine was measured at enrolment and periodically through week 50 postpartum, and by-arm differences in average weekly change in estimated creatinine clearance were compared. Six hundred forty-three participants were randomized to DTG + FTC/TAF (N = 217) or DTG + FTC/TDF (N = 215) or EFV/FTC/TDF (N = 211). Median age = 27 years (IQR 23, 32), median CD4 count = 466 cells/mm3 (IQR 308, 624); 564 (88%) women enrolled in Africa and 479 (74%) breastfed. Week 50 postpartum dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry results from 154 women were included in the analysis. Hip and spine BMD was on average higher in women in the DTG + FTC/TAF and lower in the DTG + FTC/TDF and EFV/FTC/TDF arms, but no significant differences in BMD Z-scores were observed between treatment groups. The weekly rate of change in estimated creatinine clearance differed among treatment groups during the antepartum period, but not over the full study follow-up. Markers of bone and renal toxicity did not differ significantly through week 50 postpartum among women randomized to start DTG + FTC/TAF or DTG + FTC/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF in pregnancy.

Trends in Postpartum Hemorrhage Prevalence and Comorbidity Burden: Insights from the ENACT Network Aggregated Electronic Health Record Data.

The goal of this study was to assess trends in postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), its risk factors, and maternal comorbidity burden in the United States using aggregate data from the Evolve to Next-Gen Accrual to Clinical Trials (ENACT) network. This federated network employs interactive querying of electronic health record data repositories in academic medical centers nationwide. We conducted repeated annual cross-sectional analyses to evaluate PPH occurrence and comorbidities across various ethnoracial and sociodemographic groups, starting with a large cohort of 1,287,675 unique delivery hospitalizations collected from 22 ENACT sites between 2005 and 2022. During this time, there was a statistically significant increasing trend in the prevalence of PPH, rising from 5,634 to 10,504 PPH per 100,000 deliveries (P trend <0.001). Our findings revealed a continuous upward trend in PPH rates that remained consistent among women with ≥ 1 comorbid conditions (P trend <0.001) and those with ≥ 1 maternal risk factor (P trend <0.001). This result aligns with prior studies and extends beyond the time periods previously reported. Overall, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander women had the highest PPH prevalence (~ 13%), followed by Asian (9.8%), American Indian or Alaska Native (8.9%), multirace (8.6%), Black or African American (8.4%) and White (7.4%) women. The top PPH risk factor identified was placenta previa or accreta, while the top comorbidity was antepartum hemorrhage / placental abruption. The most common cause of PPH, namely uterine atony, was prevalent in ENACT data. Our analysis highlights significant ethnoracial disparities and underscores the need for targeted preventative interventions.

Streamlining the Conduct of Cancer Clinical Trials: New Standard Data Collection Practices for National Cancer Institute Late Phase Clinical Studies.

The increase in the complexity of cancer clinical trials over the past several decades has led to a dramatic growth in trial cost and operational burden. The extent and frequency of data collection, particularly in late phase trials which enroll many participants, have been major contributors to this problem. The Clinical Trials and Translational Research Advisory Committee of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) recently assessed the impact of these stressors on the NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) and recommended that data collection in late phase NCTN trials be limited to data elements essential to address the primary and secondary objectives of the trial. The purpose of this commentary is to describe the rationale for this recommendation, progress towards implementation, and the development of new streamlined standard practices for data collection for late phase NCTN trials effective January 1, 2025.

Self-Reported Financial Difficulties Among Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated at U.S. Community Oncology Clinics (Alliance A231602CD).

To estimate the proportion and correlates of self-reported financial difficulty among patients with multiple myeloma (MM) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). 23 U.S. community and minority oncology practice sites affiliated with the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP). 521 patients (≥18 years) with MM or CLL were consented and 416 responded to a survey (completion rate=79.8%). Respondents had a MM diagnosis (74.0%), an associate degree or higher (53.4%), were White (89.2%), insured (100%) and treated with clinician-administered drugs (68.0%). Observational, prospective, protocol-based survey administered in 2019-2020. Financial difficulty was assessed using a single-item standard measure, the EORTC QLQC30: "Has your physical condition or medical treatment caused you financial difficulties in the past year?" and using an 'any-or-none' composite measure of 22 items assessing financial difficulty, worries and the use of cost-coping strategies. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the association between financial difficulty, diagnosis, and socioeconomic and treatment characteristics. 16.8% reported experiencing financial difficulty using the single-item measure and 60.3% using the composite measure. Most frequently endorsed items in the composite measure were financial worry about having to pay large medical bills related to cancer and difficulty paying medical bills. Financial difficulty using the single-item measure was associated with having MM versus CLL (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.84; P=.02), having insurance other than Medicare (aOR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.37-4.66; P=.003), being non-White (aOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.04-4.72; P=.04), and having a high school education or below (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.21-0.64; P=.001). Financial difficulty using the composite measure was associated with having a high school education or below (aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.94; P=.03). U.S. patients with blood cancer report financial difficulty, especially those with low socio-economic status. Evidence-based and targeted interventions are needed.

Peer Intervention to Link Overdose Survivors to Treatment (PILOT): Protocol for a Multisite, Randomized Controlled Trial Conducted Within the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network.

The increase in opioid-related overdoses has caused a decrease in average life expectancy, highlighting the need for effective interventions to reduce overdose risk and prevent subsequent overdoses. Peer support specialists (PSSs) offer an appealing strategy to engage overdose survivors and reduce overdose risk, but randomized controlled trials are needed to formalize peer-led interventions and evaluate their effectiveness. This National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network (CTN) study is a multisite, prospective, pilot randomized (1:1) controlled trial (CTN protocol 0107) that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an emergency department (ED)-initiated, peer-delivered intervention tailored for opioid overdose survivors (PeerIntervention to Link Overdose survivors toTreatment [PILOT]), compared with treatment as usual (TAU). This study evaluates the effectiveness of the 6-month, PSS-led PILOT intervention compared with TAU on the primary outcome of reducing overdose risk behavior 6 months after enrollment. Adults (aged ≥18 years; N=150) with a recent opioid-related overdose were identified and approached in the ED. Participants were screened and enrolled, either in the ED or within 7 days of ED discharge at research offices or in the community and then asked to complete study visits at months 1, 3, 6 (end of intervention), and 7 (follow-up). Participants were enrolled at 3 study sites in the United States: Greenville, South Carolina; Youngstown, Ohio; and Everett, Washington. Participants randomized to the PILOT intervention received a 6-month, PSS-led intervention tailored to each participant's goals to reduce their overdose risk behavior (eg, overdose harm reduction, housing, medical, and substance use treatment or recovery goals). Participants randomized to TAU received standard-of-care overdose materials, education, and services provided through the participating EDs. This paper describes the study protocol and procedures, explains the design and inclusion and exclusion decisions, and provides details of the peer-led PILOT intervention and supervision of PILOT PSSs. Study enrollment opened in December 2021 and was closed in July 2023. A total of 150 participants across 3 sites were enrolled in the study, meeting the proposed sample size for the trial. Primary and secondary analyses are underway and expected to be published in early 2025. There is an urgent need to better understand the characteristics of overdose survivors presenting to the ED and for rigorous trials evaluating the effectiveness of PSS-led interventions on engaging overdose survivors and reducing overdose risk. Results from this pilot randomized controlled trial will provide a description of the characteristics of overdose survivors presenting to the ED; outline the implementation of PSS services research in ED settings, including PSS implementation of PSS supervision and activity tracking; and inform ED-initiated PSS-led overdose risk reduction interventions and future research to better understand the implementation and efficacy of these interventions. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05123027; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05123027. DERR1-10.2196/60277.

Access to Allogeneic Cell Transplantation Based on Donor Search Prognosis: An Interventional Trial.

Patients requiring allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation have variable likelihoods of identifying an 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor. A Search Prognosis calculator can estimate the likelihood. To determine if using a search algorithm based on donor search prognosis can result in similar incidence of transplant between patients Very Likely (>90%) vs Very Unlikely (<10%) to have a matched unrelated donor. This interventional trial utilized a Search Prognosis-based biologic assignment algorithm to guide donor selection. Trial enrollment from June 13, 2019-May 13, 2022; analysis of data as of September 7, 2023 with median follow-up post-evaluability of 14.5 months. National multi-center Blood and Marrow Transplantation Clinical Trials Network 1702 study of US participating transplant centers. Acute myeloid and lymphoid leukemias, myelodysplastic syndrome, Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, severe aplastic anemia, and sickle cell disease patients referred to participating transplant centers were invited to participate. 2225 patients were enrolled and 1751 were declared evaluable for this study. Patients were declared evaluable once it was determined no suitable HLA-matched related donor was available. Patients assigned to the Very Likely arm were to proceed with matched unrelated donor, while Very Unlikely were to utilize alternative donors. A third stratum, Less Likely (∼25%) to find a matched unrelated donor, were observed under standard center practices, but were not part of the primary objective. Cumulative incidence of transplantation by Search Prognosis arm. Evaluable patients included 1751 of which 413 (24%) were from racial/ethnic minorities. Search prognosis was 958 (55%) Very Likely, 517 (30%) Less Likely and 276 (16%) Very Unlikely. 1171 (67%) received HCT, 384 (22%) died without HCT, and 196 (11%) remained alive without HCT. Among the 1,234 patients, the adjusted cumulative incidence (95% CI) of HCT at 6-months was 59.8% (56.7-62.8) in the Very Likely group versus 52.3% (46.1-58.5) in the Very Unlikely (P=0.113). A prospective Search Prognosis-based algorithm can be effectively implemented in a national multicenter clinical trial. This approach resulted in rapid alternative donor identification and comparable rates of HCT in patients Very Likely and Very Unlikely to find a matched unrelated donor. Trial Registration: NCT#03904134.

Implementability and impact in clinical research and the role of clinical trial networks.

Implementability and impact in clinical research and the role of clinical trial networks.

Does high-frequency resistance exercise offer additional benefits to older adults? learnings from a randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveResistance exercise is an effective strategy to improve muscle strength in older adults. A limited-load resistance would be flexible and suitable for community-based training. It was unclear whether high-frequency resistance exercise offer additional benefits to older adults. Here, we aimed to examine the effect of limited-load resistance exercise among different frequency on muscle parameters in older adults.MethodsThe current study was a single-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of different-frequency resistance exercise in older adults. Change in skeletal muscle was estimated with a multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analyzer. Demographics, physical examination, nutritional assessment, prealbumin and lymphocytes were also measured. Fisher’s precision probability test and baseline-adjusted generalized linear models were applied accordingly to analyze the influence of dose-different exercise on prevalence of sarcopenia, muscle parameters and body composition. A two-sided p value of < 0.05 was defined statistical significance.ResultsThe participants had a mean age of 71.96 years and close gender ratio. One hundred and twenty-seven participants (control 40; low-dose 46; high-dose 41) completed the 6-month exercise intervention. In contrast to control group, only high-dose exercise groups experienced improvements in muscle mass (0.66 kg, p < 0.001) and max grip strength (+ 2.17 kg, p < 0.001). There were significant dose-response effects of muscle mass (index), fat mass (index), max grip strength, 5-times sit to stand test, 6-minute walking test and visceral fat area (all ptrend <0.01).ConclusionsAs the proved dose-dependent effect, current findings supported high-frequency limited-load resistance exercise applied and extended among older adults in community.Trial RegistrationThis study was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Network (ChiCTR2200062007, Registered on 19 July 2022).

Policy brief – cancer research in Belgium

Research is central to achieving Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan, and is the key focus of the European Commission’s Mission on Cancer. To successfully tackle the challenges we face in cancer research, a coordinated effort of the entire Belgian scientific community is needed. It is for this reason the Belgian Cancer Research Alliance was proposed. The aim of BeCRA is to bring together various Belgian research institutes and associated care institutions and position them optimally at the EU level, with respect to the many research initiatives launched in the EBCP within the EU4Health program, the Mission on Cancer, Digital Europe programs and other EU projects. Members of BeCRA collaboratively plan the participation in certain cancer research activities to ensure optimal use of investment and sustained excellence of Belgian cancer research. Belgium cancer research has an excellent track record in fundamental, translational research and phase I, II, III clinical trials. However, translating outcomes from research to patients in the Belgian healthcare system has been less successful. Gaps in the collaboration between actors in the research field, have led to fragmentation hampering the development of fundamental and translational research. Moreover, actors from multi-disciplinary background, such as behavioural or psycho-social fields, are not systematically included in cancer research. More efficient coordination between the aforementioned actors is necessary. Academic hospitals and universities should be incentivized to collaborate across regions, as well as to put sufficient focus on research activities with a virtuous spiral ("bed-to bench" and "bench to bed" process), while supporting researchers focusing on patient-driven research. There is an urgent need for Belgium to determine how best to ensure it remains an attractive market so that patients have access to innovative care. This could include streamlining regulatory complexity, while establishing lean and harmonized clinical trial designs, procedures and networks.

Impact of COVID-19 on MOUD retention in a sample of rural primary care patients: A secondary analysis of electronic health records

IntroductionThere is limited research examining factors impacting MOUD retention in rural settings, especially within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using electronic health records data collected as part of a NIDA Clinical Trials Network study (CTN-0102), this study explored how the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic may have impacted MOUD retention in a sample of 563 rural primary care patients. MethodsCox regression model was applied to examine if COVID-19 was related to treatment retention, controlling for demographics, clinic, insurance type, and other diagnoses. The independent variable was the number of days between the patient’s first MOUD prescription date during the pre-COVID observation period (10/1/2019–3/13/2020) and the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The dependent variable was retention on MOUD, defined as the time from the first MOUD prescription documented during the pre-COVID observation period to the first break in consecutive MOUD prescriptions (right censored at 180 days). ResultsThe findings demonstrated that there was a reduced risk of a prescription break for every 10-day increase in the time from the first documented MOUD prescription to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (HR = 0.96, 95 % CI = 0.92–0.99; p = 0.011). ConclusionsWhile the data did not include complete treatment histories to determine who was new to MOUD treatment, the findings suggest that patients whose first documented MOUD prescription in the dataset was closer to the onset of the pandemic had a greater likelihood of experiencing retention challenges. This underscores the importance for clinics to establish comprehensive contingency plans for future emergencies to ensure uninterrupted MOUD treatment and support, particularly for individuals in the early stabilization phase of their recovery.

Health-related quality of life with gilteritinib vs placebo posttransplant for FLT3-ITD+ acute myeloid leukemia

AbstractThe Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) Clinical Trials Network conducted a phase 3 randomized trial comparing gilteritinib with placebo after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for FLT3-ITD+ acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The primary analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival (RFS); however, patients with FLT3-ITD measurable residual disease (MRD) peri-HCT had significantly longer RFS with gilteritinib. This analysis investigates the effect of post-HCT gilteritinib vs placebo on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). HRQOL was measured with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT), FACT-Leukemia (FACT-Leu), and EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) at post-HCT randomization; day 29; months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24; and/or end of therapy. HRQOL and clinically meaningful differences were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using mixed model repeated measures to evaluate longitudinal change from baseline and stratified Cox model to evaluate time to improvement. HRQOL completion rate was acceptable (>70%) across all time points and measures. There were no differences in HRQOL scores at any time point between cohorts. Clinically meaningful and time to improvement in HRQOL were similar in both arms. Despite higher treatment-emergent adverse effects with gilteritinib, response to the question of being “bothered by side effects of treatment” did not differ between groups. Subgroup analysis of MRD-positive and negative patients demonstrated no differences in HRQOL between arms. For patients with FLT3-ITD+ AML undergoing HCT, gilteritinib maintenance was not associated with any difference in HRQOL or patient-reported impact of side effects. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02997202.

Challenges and Opportunities in Developing an Oncology Clinical Trial Network in the United States Veterans Affairs Health Care System: The VA STARPORT Experience.

The United States Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System has a strong history of conducting impactful oncology randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We developed a phase II/III RCT to test the use of metastasis-directed therapy in Veterans with oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC)-the first VA RCT in OMPC that leverages novel imaging and advanced radiotherapy techniques. To accomplish this, we developed a clinical trial network to conduct the study. In this manuscript, we describe several challenges we encountered in study development/conduct and our strategies to address them, with the goal of helping investigators establish robust study networks to conduct clinical trials. In the study start-up, we encountered challenges in timely site activation, and leveraged project management to maximize efficiency. Additionally, there were several changes in the clinical paradigms in imaging and treatment that led to protocol amendments to ensure maximum equipoise, recruitment, and impact of the study. Specifically, we amended the trial to add de novo OMPC patients (from initially only recurrent OMPC) and expanded the study to allow up to 10 metastases (from initially five). Finally, in order to maintain local study team engagement, we developed initiatives to maximize collaboration and add value to the overall clinical program through study participation.

Randomized trial of anetumab ravtansine and pembrolizumab compared to pembrolizumab for mesothelioma

PurposeThe mesothelin-targeting antibody-drug conjugate anetumab ravtansine was evaluated in combination with the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor pembrolizumab based on the common expression of mesothelin and reports of activity in mesothelioma. Patients and methodsA phase 1 safety run-in of the combination of anetumab ravtansine (6.5 mg/kg iv q3weeks) and pembrolizumab (200 mg, IV q3weeks) was conducted, followed by a phase 2 randomization to the combination or pembrolizumab alone at medical centers across the United States and Canada in the National Cancer Institute’s Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network. Patients with pleural mesothelioma that expressed mesothelin and had previously received platinum-based therapy were eligible. ResultsIn phase 1 (n = 12) only one dose limiting toxicity was observed and the rules for dose reduction were not met. In phase 2, there was no difference in the confirmed response rates between the combination group (n = 18, 2 partial responses [PR], 11 %) and the pembrolizumab group (n = 17, 1 PR, 6 %; z = -0.5523, p = 0.29116). The median PFS was 12.2 months (95 % CI 5.1–not evaluable [NE]) for the combination, and 3.9 months for pembrolizumab (95 % CI 2.1-NE)(HR=0.55, p = 0.20). Patients with high baseline levels of soluble mesothelin who received anetumab ravtansine had a median PFS of 5 months. ConclusionsThe numeric difference in PFS between treatment groups was not statistically significant, likely related to a smaller than planned sample size. High levels of soluble mesothelin should potentially be considered to select against the use of mesothelin-targeting therapies in development that are neutralized by soluble mesothelin.

Towards cross-application model-agnostic federated cohort discovery.

To demonstrate that 2 popular cohort discovery tools, Leaf and the Shared Health Research Information Network (SHRINE), are readily interoperable. Specifically, we adapted Leaf to interoperate and function as a node in a federated data network that uses SHRINE and dynamically generate queries for heterogeneous data models. SHRINE queries are designed to run on the Informatics for Integrating Biology & the Bedside (i2b2) data model. We created functionality in Leaf to interoperate with a SHRINE data network and dynamically translate SHRINE queries to other data models. We randomly selected 500 past queries from the SHRINE-based national Evolve to Next-Gen Accrual to Clinical Trials (ENACT) network for evaluation, and an additional 100 queries to refine and debug Leaf's translation functionality. We created a script for Leaf to convert the terms in the SHRINE queries into equivalent structured query language (SQL) concepts, which were then executed on 2 other data models. 91.1% of the generated queries for non-i2b2 models returned counts within 5% (or ±5 patients for counts under 100) of i2b2, with 91.3% recall. Of the 8.9% of queries that exceeded the 5% margin, 77 of 89 (86.5%) were due to errors introduced by the Python script or the extract-transform-load process, which are easily fixed in a production deployment. The remaining errors were due to Leaf's translation function, which was later fixed. Our results support that cohort discovery applications such as Leaf and SHRINE can interoperate in federated data networks with heterogeneous data models.