Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Research Articles

Cross-sectional study using the University of California, Los Angeles, Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument 2.0 (UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0) for gastrointestinal disorders of systemic sclerosis.

This study aimed to identify severe gastrointestinal ailments in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), investigate the role of antibodies in gastrointestinal disorders, and explore the relationship between limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) in terms of gastrointestinal involvement and its association with skin stiffness. We used the University of California, Los Angeles, Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument 2.0 (UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0) questionnaire to assess gastrointestinal disturbances in 100 patients with SSc. Gastrointestinal impairment was categorized into three levels: absence of or minor symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms, as indicated by the total gastrointestinal tract (GIT) score. Comparing 27 patients with dcSSc and 73 patients with lcSSc, severe gastrointestinal disturbances were found in 7.4% of patients with dcSSc and 4.1% of patients with lcSSc. A total of 18.0% of anticentromere antibody (ACA)-positive patients exhibited moderate to severe symptoms, while 9.1% of antitopoisomerase 1 antibody-positive patients displayed similar symptoms. The average disease duration in patients with severe symptoms was 15.0 years, in those with moderate symptoms was 10.3 years, and in those who were symptom-free or mildly affected was 8.5 years. Among 16 patients with moderate to severe gastrointestinal disorders, a positive correlation was observed between the modified Rodnan skin thickness score (mRSS) and total GIT score. In addition, a positive correlation was identified between fecal incontinence and mRSS, with weaker correlations for reflux and bloating symptoms. Patients with gastrointestinal disorders showed a tendency to worsen over time, particularly in ACA-positive patients with dcSSc. Furthermore, a correlation was observed between mRSS and fecal incontinence, reflux, and abdominal bloating in patients with moderate to severe gastrointestinal disturbances.

Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Japanese version of the University of California Los Angeles scleroderma clinical trial consortium gastrointestinal tract instrument: Application to efficacy assessment of intravenous immunoglobulin administration.

This study aimed to develop and assess the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Japanese version of the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium gastrointestinal tract (GIT) Instrument 2.0 (the GIT score), as an evaluation tool for GIT symptoms in systemic sclerosis (SSc). The Japanese version of the GIT score was constructed using the forward-backward method. The reliability and validity of this instrument were evaluated in a cohort of 38 SSc patients. Correlation analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between the GIT score and existing patient-reported outcome measures. Additionally, the sensitivity of the GIT score was examined by comparing GIT scores before and after intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) administration in 10 SSc-myositis overlap patients, as IVIG has recently demonstrated effectiveness in alleviating GIT symptoms of SSc. As a result, the Japanese version of the GIT score exhibited internal consistency and a significant association with the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Furthermore, the total GIT score, as well as the reflux and distention/bloating subscales, displayed moderate correlations with the EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) pain/discomfort subscale and the Short Form-36 body pain subscale. Notably, following IVIG treatment, there was a statistically significant reduction in the total GIT score and multiple subscales. We first validated the Japanese version of the GIT score in Japanese SSc patients in real-world clinical settings. This instrument holds promise for application in future clinical trials involving this patient population.

Severity and impact of digestive impairment perceived by patients with systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional study

ObjectivesTo describe the severity and impact of gastrointestinal involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and identify associated factors.Patients and methodsNon-controlled cross-sectional study of patients with SSc (2013 American College...

Characteristics of ScleroID highlighting musculoskeletal and internal organ implications in patients afflicted with systemic sclerosis

BackgroundSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multi-organ disease with impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The EULAR SSc Impact of Disease (ScleroID) is a newly introduced SSc-specific patient-reported outcome to evaluate HRQoL in SSc.ObjectiveTo investigate the correlation between the ScleroID and the involvement of organ systems as well as disease activity/damage in a SSc cohort from a large tertiary care centre.Patients and methodsThe ScleroID and clinical characteristics including internal organ involvement and hand function were investigated in 160 consecutive patients with SSc (median age 46 (43;56) years; diffuse cutaneous SSc 55%).ResultsA strong correlation was found between the ScleroID and articular disease activity scores (DAS28-CRP, DAS28-ESR, CDAI, SDAI), a hand function performance test, the Hand Anatomy Index and muscle strength tests. Additionally, a strong significant correlation was discovered using instruments representing hand function and musculoskeletal disability including the Cochin Hand Function Scale, the Quick Questionnaire of the Disability of the Hands, Arms and the Shoulders and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index. A significant negative correlation was found between the ScleroID score and the 6-min walking test (6MWT) (rho − 0.444, p < 0.001). Clinically mild lung/heart disease did not show increased ScleroID values. The Mouth Handicap in the Scleroderma Scale and the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium gastrointestinal tract 2.0 also showed significant positive correlations to the ScleroID score (rho: 0.626, p < 0.001; rho: 0.646, p < 0.001, respectively). Patients experiencing oesophageal difficulties bore a significantly higher score compared to individuals with a normal functioning oesophagus (3.2/1.5;4.5/ vs. 2.2/1.0;3.2/, p = 0.011). Moreover, the ScleroID showed a significant positive correlation to the revised EUSTAR disease activity index and modified activity index.ConclusionIn a large single-centre cohort, the previously described ScleroID-related findings were confirmed. Furthermore, several organ involvement-related functional and performance tests showed a good correlation to the ScleroID including the 6MWT and gastrointestinal-related complaints. Many aspects of musculoskeletal damage, overall disease activity, pain and fatigue were also well represented in the ScleroID, which efficiently reflects the impact of organ involvement, disease activity and functional damage.

Gastrointestinal tract involvement in systemic sclerosis: The roles of diet and the microbiome

BackgroundAlterations in gastrointestinal (GI) microbial composition have been reported in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, it is unclear to what degree these alterations and/or dietary changes contribute to the SSc-GI phenotype. ObjectivesOur study aimed to 1) evaluate the relationship between GI microbial composition and SSc-GI symptoms, and 2) compare GI symptoms and GI microbial composition between SSc patients adhering to a low versus non-low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) diet. MethodsAdult SSc patients were consecutively recruited to provide stool specimens for bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Patients completed the UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument (GIT 2.0) and the Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ) II and were classified as adhering to a low or non-low FODMAP diet. GI microbial differences were assessed using three metrics of alpha diversity (species richness, evenness, and phylogenetic diversity), as well as beta diversity (overall microbial composition). Differential abundance analysis was performed to identify specific genera associated with SSc-GI phenotype and low versus non-low FODMAP diet. ResultsOf the 66 total SSc patients included, the majority were women (n = 56) with a mean disease duration of 9.6 years. Thirty-five participants completed the DHQ II. Increased severity of GI symptoms (total GIT 2.0 score) was associated with decreased species diversity and differences in GI microbial composition. Specifically, pathobiont genera (e.g., Klebsiella and Enterococcus) were significantly more abundant in patients with increased GI symptom severity. When comparing low (N = 19) versus non-low (N = 16) FODMAP groups, there were no significant differences in GI symptom severity or in alpha and beta diversity. Compared with the low FODMAP group, the non-low FODMAP group had greater abundance of the pathobiont Enterococcus. ConclusionSSc patients reporting more severe GI symptoms exhibited GI microbial dysbiosis characterized by less species diversity and alterations in microbial composition. A low FODMAP diet was not associated with significant alterations in GI microbial composition or reduced SSc-GI symptoms; however, randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the impact of specific diets on GI symptoms in SSc.

A Phenome-Wide Association Study of Drugs and Comorbidities Associated With Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in Systemic Sclerosis.

To explore the causes of and contributors to gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction in systemic sclerosis (SSc) in a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS), using real-world clinical records data. Twelve thousand five hundred thirty-five documented clinical assessments of 2058 consenting individuals with SSc at the Royal Free Hospital (UK) were available for detailed phenotyping. Diagnoses and drugs were mapped to structured dictionaries of terms (Disease Ontology project and DrugBank Open Data, respectively). A PheWAS model was used to explore links between 6 important SSc-GI domains (constipation, diarrhea, dysmotility, incontinence, gastroesophageal reflux, and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth [SIBO]) and exposure to various comorbidities and drugs. "Hits" from the PheWAS model were confirmed and explored in a subcohort reporting quantitative GI symptom scores from the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument 2.0 (GIT 2.0) questionnaire. One thousand five hundred forty-six individuals were entered into the PheWAS analysis. Six hundred seventy-three distinct diagnoses and 634 distinct drugs were identified in the dataset, as well as SSc-specific phenotypes such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA). PheWAS analysis revealed associations between drugs, diagnoses, and ANAs with 6 important SSc-GI outcomes: constipation, diarrhea, dysmotility, incontinence, reflux, and SIBO. Subsequently, using GIT 2.0 symptom scores links with SSc-GI were confirmed for 22 drugs, 4 diagnoses, and 3 ANAs. Using a hypothesis-free PheWAS approach, we replicated known, and revealed potential novel, risk factors for SSc-GI dysfunction, including drug classes such as opioid, antimuscarinic, and endothelin receptor antagonist, and ANA subgroup.

Association of Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux, Esophageal Dilation, and Progression of Systemic Sclerosis-Related Interstitial Lung Disease.

To investigate whether symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease and radiographic measures of esophageal dilation are associated with radiographic progression of systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Participants of the Scleroderma Lung Study II, which compared mycophenolate versus cyclophosphamide for SSc-ILD, completed the reflux domain of the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract 2.0 at baseline. The diameter and area of the esophagus in the region of maximum dilation was measured by quantitative image analysis. Univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses were created to evaluate the relationship between these measures of esophageal involvement and progression of SSc-ILD over 2 years, based on the radiologic quantitative interstitial lung disease (QILD) and quantitative lung fibrosis (QLF) in the lobe of maximum involvement (LM). All multivariable models controlled for the treatment arm, baseline ILD severity, and proton-pump inhibitor use. The baseline mean patient-reported reflux score was 0.57, indicating moderate reflux (n=141). Baseline mean maximal esophageal diameter and area were 22 mm and 242 mm2 , respectively. Baseline reflux scores were significantly associated with the change in QLF-LM and QILD-LM in the univariate and multivariable models. Neither radiographic measure of esophageal dilation was associated with the change in radiographic measures of lung involvement. Severity of reflux symptoms as measured by an SSc-specific questionnaire was independently associated with the change in the radiographic extent of ILD and fibrosis over 2 years in patients with SSc-ILD. Two objective measures of esophageal dilation were not associated with radiographic progression of ILD, highlighting the need for improved objective measures of esophageal dysfunction in SSc.

Development and validation of Hebrew version of the UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument 2.0.

The aim of this study was to test the reliability of the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract (UCLA SCTC GIT) 2.0 questionnaire in Hebrew. UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0 was translated into Hebrew using the translation-retranslation method. The Hebrew version of the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0 and the Hebrew version of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) were administered to 19 Hebrew-speaking patients with systemic sclerosis. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. The Hebrew questionnaire was then tested for external validity using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Correlations (rho) ⩽ 0.29 were considered small, 0.30 to 0.49 were moderate, and those ⩾0.50 were considered large. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. A group of 19 patients treated at Sheba Medical Center meeting the ACR/EULAR classification system for systemic sclerosis were included in the study. The mean age of the participants was 60.4 ± 12 years with a female predominance (84%). Diffuse cutaneous scleroderma accounted for 10 of the participants (54%), 7 had limited cutaneous scleroderma (36%) with 2 having an overlap syndrome (10%). The Cronbach's alpha value for the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0 scale was 0.908 showing reliability. In addition, the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0 showed correlation to the SF-36. The translation of the Hebrew UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0 scale was reliable and valid with a total Cronbach's alpha score among the participants of 0.908. Cronbach's alpha was particularly reliable in reflux, bloating, social function, and emotional well-being. Our results suggest that our Hebrew version of the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0 scale can be used as a tool in future studies with Hebrew-speaking patients. In the abstract conclusion, it states that "Cronbach's alpha was particularly reliable in reflux, bloating, social function, and emotional well-being." The related data should be listed in the results section and then an interpretation of the results should be listed in the conclusions section. Please revise.

OP0003 DOES IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY IMPROVE GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS?

BackgroundThe gastrointestinal (GI) tract is frequently affected in systemic sclerosis (SSc), leading to considerable morbidity and even mortality. While important progress has been made in the last years regarding treatment of SSc, there is no disease-modifying treatment available for SSc-related GI involvement.ObjectivesWe aimed to identify, in an observational cohort study of real-life patients with SSc, an association between immunosuppressive therapy and the severity of GI symptoms, measured by the University of California at Los Angeles / Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastro-Intestinal Tract instrument 2.0 (UCLA GIT 2.0).MethodsWe selected patients from our EUSTAR centre who met the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc and had at least two visits with completed UCLA GIT 2.0 questionnaires, with an interval of 12±3 months between visits. We defined the first visit with a completed UCLA GIT 2.0 questionnaire as baseline visit. Immunosuppressive therapy was defined as exposure for at least 6 months between the two visits to at least one of the following drugs, regardless of indication: mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, azathioprine, leflunomide, glucocorticoids (&gt;10mg/d prednisone-equivalent), rituximab, tocilizumab, and abatacept. The study outcome was the UCLA GIT 2.0 score at the follow-up visit. We performed multivariable linear regression with this outcome as dependent variable and immunosuppressive therapy during follow-up, immunosuppressive therapy before baseline, baseline UCLA GIT 2.0 score and several baseline parameters selected by clinical judgment as potentially influencing GI symptoms, as independent variables. Multiple imputation was implemented to handle missing values.ResultsWe included 209 patients. Baseline characteristics were: 82.3% female, median (IQR) age 59.0 (48.6, 68.2) years, median disease duration 6.0 (2.7, 12.5) years, 40 (19.1%) diffuse cutaneous SSc, median baseline UCLA GIT 2.0 score 0.19 (0.06, 0.43). Of these, 71 patients were exposed to immunosuppressive therapy during the observation period: 27/71 methotrexate, 1/71 cyclophosphamide, 17/71 MMF, 3/71 leflunomide, 3/71 azathioprine, 6/71 glucocorticoids &gt;10mg/d, 16/34 rituximab, 18/34 tocilizumab. Patients on immunosuppressive therapy during the observation period had, compared to patients without such treatment, overall more severe SSc, higher prevalence of treatment with proton pump inhibitors, similar UCLA GIT 2.0 scores at baseline and at follow up and tendentially less severe GI symptoms at baseline and follow-up by medical history. In multivariable linear regression, immunosuppressive therapy, lower body mass index, longer disease duration and lower baseline UCLA GIT 2.0 score were significantly associated with lower (better) UCLA GIT 2.0 scores at follow-up (Table 1).Table 1.Predictors of UCLA GIT 2.0 score at follow-upEstimates95% CIpAge0.002-0.001 – 0.0060.136Sex [male]-0.056-0.172 – 0.0610.347Disease duration-0.005-0.009 – -0.0000.030Body mass index0.0140.002 – 0.0250.017UCLA GIT 2.0 total score baseline0.6900.571 – 0.809&lt;0.001Immunosuppressive therapy during observation period-0.119-0.228 – -0.0100.032Immunosuppressive therapy before baseline0.080-0.032 – 0.1920.160Modified Rodnan Skin Score-0.001-0.008 – 0.0070.860Forced vital capacity-0.001-0.004 – 0.0010.302Erythrocyte sedimentation rate0.003-0.001 – 0.0060.116Proton pump inhibitors-0.034-0.120 – 0.0520.435(Intercept)-0.120-0.531 – 0.2910.566Baseline factors associated with the total UCLA GIT 2.0 score at the end of the observation period. Multiple linear regression model with imputation for missing variables. N=209 patientsConclusionImmunosuppressive treatment was associated with lower UCLA GIT 2.0 scores, which suggests potential effects of immunosuppressants on GI manifestations in patients with SSc. These results need verification in additional studies and randomised controlled clinical trials.

Gastroparesis in systemic sclerosis: a detailed analysis using whole-gut scintigraphy.

Gastroparesis is a common complication of SSc. We sought to determine the degree of overlap between gastroparesis and dysmotility in other areas of the gut, correlate our findings with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, and examine associations between gastroparesis and SSc features. Whole-gut scintigraphy was performed on SSc patients who were enrolled in the Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Cohort, for whom detailed longitudinal clinical and serologic data are collected. A subset of patients completed the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument 2.0 (UCLA GIT 2.0) to quantify their GI symptoms. We examined associations between the presence and severity of gastroparesis, GI symptoms, and SSc clinical features. Ninety-seven SSc patients with and without GI symptoms underwent whole-gut scintigraphy and completed the gastric emptying study. Of the 97, 34 (35%) met criteria for gastroparesis. Of the measures assessed, delayed liquid emptying captured more patients with delayed gastric transit than delayed solid emptying (74% vs 55%), and percentage liquid emptying correlated best with GIT Reflux (ρ = -0.33, P = 0.01) and Distension (ρ = -0.30, P = 0.03) scores. Of 33 patients with gastroparesis, 30 (91%) had abnormal transit in other areas of the GI tract. Higher anti-centromere protein B (CENP-B) titres correlated with slower gastric emptying (ρ = -0.26, P = 0.03), but no specific clinical features of SSc were associated with gastroparesis. Gastric emptying of liquids when given alongside solids may be more sensitive and provide a more clinically relevant measure of gastroparesis in SSc than solid gastric emptying or liquid gastric emptying alone. SSc patients with gastroparesis frequently have dysmotility in other areas of the GI tract, underscoring the need for whole-gut scintigraphy to evaluate the entire gut.

Relationship Between Gastrointestinal Transit, Medsger Gastrointestinal Severity, and University of California-Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract 2.0 Symptoms in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated gastrointestinal (GI) complications are attributed to a variety of factors, including diet, microbiota dysbiosis, or GI transit abnormalities. Our objective was to examine the contribution of abnormal GI transit to SSc Medsger GI severity scores and/or University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract (UCLA GIT) 2.0 symptoms. Patients with SSc and GI symptoms (n = 71) and healthy controls (n = 18) underwent whole gut transit (WGT) scintigraphy to assess transit from the esophagus to the colon. The presence of delayed transit and percent emptying in each GI region were measured. We compared the WGT measurements between categories of the Medsger GI severity score (0-4) and across UCLA GIT 2.0 domains and total score (0-3). A total of 88% of patients had >1 abnormal region of the gut on WGT scintigraphy. All patients requiring total parenteral nutrition had delayed small bowel transit, compared to only approximately 11% of patients in other Medsger GI severity groups (P ≤ 0.01). Severe colonic transit delays were more likely in patients with Medsger GI scores of 3 (pseudo-obstruction and/or malabsorption) compared to other Medsger GI groups (P = 0.02). Seventy-percent of these patients had ≤30% colonic emptying at 72 hours. Modest associations were noted between gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and delayed esophageal (r = -0.31, P = 0.05) and gastric emptying (r = -0.32, P = 0.05). These data are important in providing evidence that SSc bowel disease affects transit of GI content and that delay in transit accounts in part for both bowel symptoms and Medsger GI severity. Prospective studies examining the benefit of early therapeutic intervention targeting GI transit abnormalities in patients at high risk for severe GI complications are needed.

Fecal microbiome differs between patients with systemic sclerosis with and without small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.

Introduction:Gastrointestinal manifestations of systemic sclerosis affect up to 90% of patients, with symptoms including diarrhea and constipation. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth is a condition associated with increased numbers of pathogenic bacteria in the small bowel. While currently unknown, it has been suggested that dysregulation of the fecal microbiota may play a role in the development of systemic sclerosis and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.Objectives:Our study aimed to describe the fecal microbiota of patients with systemic sclerosis and compare it between those with and without a diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. We also compared the fecal microbiota of systemic sclerosis patients with that of healthy controls to understand the association between particular bacterial taxa and clinical gastrointestinal manifestations of systemic sclerosis.Methods:A total of 29 patients with systemic sclerosis underwent breath testing to assess for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, provided stool samples to determine taxonomic assignments, and completed the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract 2.0, which details symptoms and quality-of-life factors. Stool samples were compared between systemic sclerosis patients with and without small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, and between patients with systemic sclerosis and a healthy control cohort (n = 20), aged 18–80 years.Results:Fecal microbiome analyses demonstrated differences between systemic sclerosis patients with and without small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and differences in the diversity of species between healthy controls and patients with systemic sclerosis. Trends were also observed in anticentromere antibody systemic sclerosis patients, including higher Alistipies indistincus spp. levels associated with increased methane levels of breath gas testing and higher Slakia spp. levels associated with increased rates of fecal soiling.Conclusions:Our results suggest that changes to the fecal microbiome occur in patients with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and systemic sclerosis when compared to healthy controls. As a cross-sectional study, the potential pathophysiologic role of an altered microbiome in the development of systemic sclerosis was not considered and hence needs to be further investigated.

Performance of the UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract 2.0 instrument as a clinical decision aid in the routine clinical care of patients with systemic sclerosis

Background and objectivesThe University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument 2.0 (UCLA GIT 2.0) is validated to capture gastrointestinal (GI) tract morbidity in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The aims of this study were to determine in a large SSc cohort if the UCLA GIT 2.0 is able to discriminate patients for whom a rheumatologist with experience in SSc would recommend an esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD), and if it could identify patients with endoscopically proven esophagitis or with any pathologic finding on EGD.MethodsWe selected patients fulfilling the ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria for SSc from our EUSTAR center having completed at least once the UCLA GIT 2.0 questionnaire, and we collected data on gastrointestinal symptoms and EGD from their medical charts. We analyzed by general linear mixed effect models several parameters, including UCLA GIT 2.0, considered as potentially associated with the indication of EGD, as well as with endoscopic esophagitis and any pathologic finding on EGD.ResultsWe identified 346 patients (82.7% female, median age 63 years, median disease duration 10 years, 23% diffuse cutaneous SSc) satisfying the inclusion criteria, who completed UCLA GIT 2.0 questionnaires at 940 visits. EGD was recommended at 169 visits. In multivariable analysis, UCLA GIT 2.0 and some of its subscales (reflux, distention/bloating, social functioning) were associated with the indication of EGD. In 177 EGD performed in 145 patients, neither the total ULCA GIT 2.0 score nor any of its subscales were associated with endoscopic esophagitis, nor with any pathologic EGD findings.ConclusionsIn a real-life setting, the UCLA GIT 2.0 and its reflux subscale were able to discriminate patients with SSc who had an indication for EGD, but did not correlate with findings in EGD. We conclude that, while using the UCLA GIT 2.0 in the routine care of patients with SSc may help the rheumatologist to better understand the burden of GI symptoms in the individual patient, it should not be used as a stand-alone instrument to identify an indication of EGD.

Progression of gastrointestinal symptoms over time in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Up to 90% of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) develop gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. To evaluate whether GI symptoms and quality of life in patients with SSc demonstrate longitudinal stability. Consecutive patients with SSc (n = 100) completed the validated university of California at Los Angeles scleroderma clinical trial consortium gastrointestinal tract 2.0 (GIT) instrument and completed the same instrument approximately 5years later. Comparison was made between patients with diffuse (dcSSc) and limited (lcSSc) subtypes and duration of disease of less than or greater than 5years. GIT scores were calculated and analyzed for differences. 37 patients with dcSSc and 63 patients with lcSSc were included. Social functioning score significantly improved over time [0.44 (0.59)-0.31 (0.47); P = 0.003]. Total GIT scores were lower in patients with diffuse [0.51 (0.41)] compared with limited [(0.72 (0.53); P = 0.029] disease at both baseline and follow-up. Social functioning improved similarly in both dcSSc and lcSSc over time (P = 0.004). GIT Total scores increased in 27% (27/100) of patients and did not change or improved in 73% (73/100). Patients with worsening GI status had significantly increased scores on all GIT subscales. A lower body-mass index at baseline was significantly associated with worsening GIT Total score (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.07-1.39; P < 0.001). Patients with SSc generally demonstrate longitudinal stability or improvement in their GI symptoms, but a subset of patients experience worsening of GI symptoms and negative impacts on GI-related quality of life.

Responsiveness of the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium gastrointestinal tract 2.0 (UCLA-SCTC-GIT 2.0)to change in scleroderma patients

Gastrointestinal tract involvement in systemic sclerosis is the most common internal organ involvement. Among the few validated patient-reported outcome measures for gastrointestinal involvement are the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium gastrointestinal tract 2.0 (UCLA-GIT 2.0) and the gastrointestinal problems' visual analog scale (SHAQ-VAS). The latter is a component of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index. Our aim is to compare the responsiveness of the UCLA-GIT 2.0 total score, single domains, upper and lower gastrointestinal domains, and gastrointestinal problems' visual analog scale of the scleroderma HAQ(SHAQ-GI-VAS) to change in gastrointestinal medication. In addition, we evaluated the correlation between the UCLA-GIT 2.0 and SHAQ-GI-VAS scale in our systemic sclerosis population. One hundred fifteen systemic sclerosis patients attending the University of California Los Angeles and Seattle outpatient clinics with two or more consecutive visits were enrolled in our study. The UCLA-GIT 2.0 and SHAQ_VAS were completed by all patients at both visits; any change in gastrointestinal medication at the baseline visit was reported. UCLA-GIT 2.0 asks about how the gastrointestinal tract affects the patient over the last week; It consists of 34 questions in seven domains (reflux, distension, soilage, diarrhea, social function, emotional wellbeing, and constipation). THE SHAQ-GI-VAS is a 100-mm horizontal VAS that asks the patient; "In the past week, how much did your gastrointestinal symptoms interfere with your function". These measures were evaluated at two consecutive visits. Any change in gastrointestinal medication at baseline visit was reported. Percent change was calculated to evaluate the change in the values of the UCLA-GIT 2.0 and the SHAQ_GI-VAS, and we dichotomized the patients into two groups according to whether there was a change in gastrointestinal treatment or not. Pearson correlation was used to correlate both tests at baseline. Ninety-eight (85%) of the systemic sclerosis patients were females, mean age: 52 years (standard deviation ± 12.9); median disease duration: 7 (range: 4-11 years), diffuse subtype: 57 patients (50%), median baseline gastrointestinal tract 2.0 was 0.3 (0.1-0.7) and median baseline SHAQ-GI-VAS was 0.8 (0-4.1). Out of the 115 patients, 41 (37.0%) patients needed a change in gastrointestinal medication at baseline visit (Group 1); they were compared to those not changing gastrointestinal medications (Group 2). Responsiveness to gastrointestinal medication treatment change in the form of percent change in total UCLA-GIT 2.0 was significantly more in Group 1 than in Group 2 (-6.6 (standard deviation = 20) in Group 1 vs +6.9 (standard deviation ± 18.8) in Group 2, p value < 0.001). On the contrary, there was no statistically significant difference between percent changes in SHAQ-GI-VAS from the in Group 1 versus Group 2 (59.5 (standard deviation ± 172) in Group 1 vs 51.9 (standard deviation ± 126.4) in Group 2, p value = 0.816). The correlation between the UCLA-GIT 2.0 and the SHAQ_GI-VAS was moderate (r = 0.6). The University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium gastrointestinal tract 2.0 and gastrointestinal problems' visual analog scale are utilized to measure gastrointestinal tract involvement in systemic sclerosis. Unlike the gastrointestinal problems' visual analog scale, the gastrointestinal tract 2.0 was responsive to change in gastrointestinal medication while the SHAQ-GI-VAS was not. Hence, the UCLA-GIT 2.0 could be utilized in future trials and observational studies as a measure of systemic sclerosis gastrointestinal responsiveness.

Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the University of California-Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract instrument in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Background/AimsSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is associated with a wide range of gastrointestinal (GI) changes. The University of California–Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract (UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0) instrument is a self-administered GI assessment instrument for patients with SSc. We developed a Korean version of the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0 instrument and evaluated its reliability and internal consistency.MethodsThe participants were 37 Korean patients with SSc. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0 were performed according to international standardized guidelines. We evaluated reproducibility by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficients and assessed the internal consistency of the Korean version of the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0. We assessed its construct validity by evaluating its correlations with the Short Form Health Survey version 2 and EQ-5D scores by means of Spearman correlation analyses.ResultsPatients with SSc were mostly women (89.19%) with a mean age of 52.2 years, median disease duration of 24 months, and median modified Rodnan total skin score of 4. The median total GIT score on the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0 was 0.3. The UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0 Korean version showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α of total GIT score = 0.863). Most domains of the ULCA SCTC GIT 2.0 were correlated with those of the EuroQol (EQ)-5D score.ConclusionsThe Korean version of the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0 has acceptable internal consistency, reliability, and validity. Therefore, it can be used to assess GIT involvement in Korean patients with SSc.

UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) 2.0 Reflux Scale Correlates With Impaired Esophageal Scintigraphy Findings in Systemic Sclerosis.

The University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract 2.0 (GIT 2.0) instrument is a self-report tool measuring gastrointestinal (GI) quality of life in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Scarce data are available on the correlation between patient-reported GI symptoms and motility dysfunction as assessed by esophageal transit scintigraphy (ETS). We evaluated the GIT 2.0 reflux scale in patients with SSc admitted to our clinic and undergoing ETS, and correlated their findings. Thirty-one patients with SSc undergoing ETS were included. Twenty-seven were female, and 9 had diffuse cutaneous SSc. Twenty-six of 31 (84%) patients had a delayed transit and an abnormal esophageal emptying activity (EA); they also had a higher GIT 2.0 reflux score (P = 0.04). Mean EA percentage was higher in patients with none to mild GIT 2.0 reflux score (81.1 [SD 11.5]) than in those with moderate (55.7 [SD 17.8], P = 0.003) and severe to very severe scores (55.8 [SD 19.7], P = 0.002). The percentage of esophageal EA negatively correlated with the GIT 2.0 reflux score (r = -0.68, P < 0.0001), but it did not correlate with the other GIT 2.0 scales and the total GIT 2.0 score. SSc patients with impaired ETS findings have a higher GIT 2.0 reflux score. The GIT 2.0 is a complementary tool for objective measurement of esophageal involvement that can be easily administered in day-to-day clinical assessment.

P156 Understanding the associations and impact of severe gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis: a structured approach

Abstract Background Gastrointestinal (GI) involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc) has a profound negative impact on patients’ quality of life. However, due to the diversity in manifestations of SSc-associated GI disease, this impact has proven difficult to quantify and to associate with other clinical and demographic features, to identify those most at risk of severe disease. Methods Between September and December 2018, consecutive SSc patients attending a specialist scleroderma clinic completed the UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract 2.0 (UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0) questionnaire. Total score and separate domain scores (reflux, distention/bloating, diarrhoea, soilage, constipation, social functioning and emotional wellbeing) were calculated. Domain scores range between 0 and 3, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Associations between mean scores and demographic or clinical characteristics were analysed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results In total, 224 SSc patients fully completed the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0. Eighty-three percent were female, mean age was 58.2 years and mean disease duration was 14.3 years. Diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) was present in 37.1%, and 22.3% had an overlap syndrome. The most common autoantibodies were anti-centromere (ACA) in 38.0%, anti-topoisomerase I (ATA) in 20.1%, anti-RNA polymerase in 11.2% and anti-U3RNP in 4.5% of patients. For the cohort, the total GIT score was 0.62±0.57 (mean±SD), correlating strongly with visual analogue scale self-reported impact of GI disease (Pearson’s r = 0.72, p &amp;lt; 0.001). Distribution of total and domain scores is summarised in Table 1. We found no association between demographic or clinical characteristics and total GIT score, reflux, distention/bloating, diarrhoea and social functioning. Constipation was most common among ATA + (score 0.69, p = 0.080 v ATA-) and least common among ARA+ subjects (score 0.25, p = 0.014 v ARA-). Soilage was more common in limited cutaneous SSc (score 0.56 v 0.29 in dcSSc, p = 0.048) and ACA+ subjects (score 0.67 v 0.33 in ACA-, p = 0.008). ACA+ patients also had worse emotional wellbeing (score 0.70 v 0.52 in ACA-, p = 0.014). Emotional wellbeing was more severely affected in females (score 0.62 v 0.43 in males, p = 0.078). Conclusion We found that moderate to severe GI disease affects nearly half of all subjects with SSc, which significantly contributes to disease-related morbidity. Disclosures F. Ahmed None. S.I. Nihtyanova None. S. Chatzinikolaou None. V.H. Ong None. C.D. Murray None. C.P. Denton None.

The role of high-resolution manometry in the assessment of upper gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) affects the upper gastrointestinal (GI) system in 90% of patients. High-resolution manometry (HRM) assesses esophageal dysmotility, but its role in diagnosis and follow-up remains unclear. The objectives of this systematic review were to investigate the role of HRM in the assessment of SSc-associated upper GI involvement and to evaluate the correlation between HRM abnormalities and clinical characteristics and the effects of therapeutic interventions on HRM findings. Fifteen articles were included. Most (11/15) studies were of very good or good quality. Most studies assessed correlations between esophageal symptoms and esophageal dysmotility. Two studies assessed the effectiveness of buspirone and reported HRM findings. Studies assessing upper GI symptoms using validated questionnaires, such as the University of California Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract 2.0 or Gastrointestinal Symptoms Severity Index score, found an association between absent contractility on HRM and upper GI symptoms, but even asymptomatic patients often have esophageal body dysmotility on HRM. Esophageal dysmotility positively correlates with the presence of interstitial lung disease on high-resolution computed tomography and reduced diffusion capacity (< 0.8 of predicted value). Trials investigating the effect of buspirone demonstrate both increased lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure and reduced upper GI symptoms. Most studies report on limited patient numbers and retrospective data. Potential bias was minimized using quality appraisal. HRM findings correlate to upper GI symptoms when assessed by validated questionnaires and can detect response to therapy in buspirone trials. Esophageal body dysmotility on HRM positively correlates with the presence of interstitial lung disease. KEY POINTS: • Esophageal body dysmotility on HRM correlates with presence of ILD. • HRM findings seem to correspond to clinical symptom alleviation in interventional trials, but data are still limited. • At present HRM, a procedure with a high negative burden to the patient, offers little to no role in the therapeutic strategy.

The Relationship Between Autonomic Dysfunction of the Gastrointestinal Tract and Emotional Distress in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis.

We hypothesized that emotional distress in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients with moderate to severe gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction is associated with dysautonomia. We sought to determine (1) the clinical characteristics associated with emotional distress in SSc, (2) the odds of having dysautonomia in those with emotional distress, and (3) whether GI dysautonomia, as measured by the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS), correlates with GI dysautonomia on the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31 (COMPASS-31). Clinical and demographic features from our prospective cohort study were compared among SSc patients with and without GI-associated emotional distress (University of California at Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract 2.0 well-being subscale >0.5 or ≤0.5) in cross-sectional analysis. Covariates/confounders independently associated with emotional distress were used to construct multivariable logistic regression models. The COMPASS-31 and SAS GI subdomains were compared with Spearman correlation. Forty-six patients with SSc were enrolled in the study. In univariate analyses, age (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; p = 0.026), severity of GI dysautonomia (COMPASS-31: OR, 1.41; p = 0.003), anti-centromere (A/B) antibodies (OR, 3.60; p = 0.044), and anti-PM-Scl (75/100) antibodies (OR, 0.15; p = 0.035) were associated with emotional distress. In the adjusted model, those with more severe GI dysautonomia remained more likely to have emotional distress (OR, 1.85; p = 0.026); those with anti-PM-Scl (75/100) antibodies were less likely to have emotional distress (OR, 0.03; p = 0.031). The SAS and COMPASS-31 GI subdomains moderately correlated (ρ = 0.68, p < 0.001). In SSc, increased symptom burden related to GI dysautonomia is associated with emotional distress. Multidisciplinary approaches addressing both the physical and emotional needs of the SSc patient may be warranted to optimize patient care.