Abstract Background The CHADS2 score is a well-known risk score for ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Recently, it has been reported that the CHADS2 score was associated with an increased risk of new-onset lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) in patients without AF, the association between the CHADS2 score and clinical outcomes in patients with LEAD undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) without AF remains unclear. Furthermore, malnutrition assessed by the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) has been reported to be predictive of clinical outcomes in patients with LEAD. However, there are limited studies regarding the association of combined assessment of the GNRI and CHADS2 score and clinical outcomes in patients with LEAD without AF. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the combined assessment of GNRI and CHADS2 score, and mortality of LEAD patients undergoing EVT without AF. Methods This retrospective study investigated 236 consecutive LEAD patients who underwent EVT without AF. CHADS2 scores were calculated by assigning one point for heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, and diabetes; and assigning 2 points for a prior history of stroke or transient ischemic attack. The GNRI on admission was calculated as follows: [14.89 × albumin (g/dL)] + [41.7 × (body weight/ideal body weight)], and the CHADS2 score and GNRI were calculated for each patient. We scored GNRI by assigning 2 points to low GNRI (GNRI <82) and 1 point to intermediate GNRI (GNRI =82 to <92). We then calculated the CHADS2 plus GNRI score for each patient and then patients were divided into the high CHADS2 plus GNRI scoregroup (CHADS2 plus GNRI score> 2, n = 123) and the low CHADS2plus GNRI score group (CHADS2 plus GNRI score≤ 2, n = 113) according to the median CHADS2 plus GNRI score. We investigated the associations between all-cause mortality in patients with LEAD who underwent EVT and the CHADS2 plus GNRI score. Results The mean age was 71.9±10.4 years, and 66.9% were men. During the median follow-up of 752 (283–1472) days, 50 patients died. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that the cumulative incidence of all-cause death was significantly higher in the high CHADS2 plus GNRI score group than in the low CHADS2 plus GNRI score group (log-rank p = 0.003). Furthermore, even in the multivariate analysis,after adjusting for other risk factors including hemodialysis and clinical frailty scale, CHADS2 plus GNRI score was independently associated with all-cause death (per one score increase, hazard ratio: 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.56, P=0.038). Conclusions In LEAD patients who underwent EVT without AF, a higher CHADS2 plus GNRI score was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death. A Combined CHADS2 plus GNRI score assessment may be a useful prognostic marker in patients with LEAD without AF.