Clinical Research Office Of The Endourological Society Research Articles

Comparison of STONE Score, Guy's Stone Score, CROES Nomogram, and Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity Score in Prognosticating Outcomes of Multiple-Tract Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Retrospective Study.

Objective The objective of this study was to compare the STONE score (Size of the stone, Topography or location, degree of Obstruction of the urinary system, Number of stones, and Evaluation of Hounsfield units), Guy's stone score (GSS), Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) nomogram, and Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity Score (RSCS) in prognosticating multiple tract mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) outcome. Methodology Thisdescriptive retrospective analysis was carried out at the Urology Department, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan. Male and female patients in the age range of 18-70 years who underwent multiple tract mPCNL for renal stones from July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2023, were included in the analysis. Results A total of 110 patients were registered. Stone-free status (SFS) was achieved in 78.2% (n=86), and complications were observed in 13.6% (n=15) patients. The odds ratio for STONE score, GSS, CROES scoring system, and RSCS for predicting the SFS was 7.093 (95%CI 2.40-20.89), 9.333 (95%CI 2.92-29.81), 11.70 (95%CI 2.56-53.38) and 3.450 (95%CI 1.25-9.53), respectively. Conclusion Multiple tract mPCNL is a safe and effective technique for the management of renal stones, producing a high stone-free rate. This study demonstrated adequate efficacy and dependability of the four scoring systems in predicting SFS.

Comparison between different radiological scoring systems in predicting post-PCNL outcome

Background: Various scoring systems, including Guy's stone score (GSS), S.T.O.N.E. score, and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) nomogram, have been assessed for predicting post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) success in terms of stone-free status (SFS) and complications. Our study aims to determine the optimal predictor of SFS among these systems and assess their efficacy in predicting perioperative factors and complications, using modified Clavien grade. Methods: This prospective hospital-based cohort study involved 107 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent standard PCNL (tract size >24 Fr) within a year. GSS, S.T.O.N.E. score, and CROES nomogram were calculated using preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Comparisons between 'stone-free' and 'residual-stone' groups were statistically analyzed. Results: All parameters effectively predicted SFS. S.T.O.N.E. score exhibited excellent discriminatory power (AUC 0.844; 95% CI: 0.762-0.907), followed by GSS (AUC 0.756; 95% CI: 0.663-0.834) and CROES nomogram (AUC 0.749; 95% CI: 0.656-0.828). S.T.O.N.E. score, with an AUC of 0.844, proved the most accurate predictor at ≤7 cut-off. GUY's score correlated positively with operative time and hospital stay (correlation coefficient 0.403, 0.34). S.T.O.N.E. score also positively correlated with these factors (correlation coefficient 0.443, 0.37). CROES nomogram negatively correlated with operative time and hospital stay (correlation coefficient -0.374, -0.314). Conclusions: All scoring systems effectively predict post-PCNL SFS, with S.T.O.N.E. score being the most predictive. GSS and S.T.O.N.E. score associate significantly with operative time and hospital stay. Both GSS and S.T.O.N.E. score show significant associations with perioperative complications assessed by modified Clavien grade.

Reliability of nephrolithometric nomograms in patients treated with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A precision study

ObjectivesThe study aimed to evaluate quality of nephrolithometric nomograms to predict stone-free rates (SFRs) and complication rates (CRs) in case of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). In the last decade, nomograms have been introduced to estimate the SFRs and CRs of PNL. However, no data are available regarding their reliability in case of utilization of miniaturized devices. Herein we present a prospective multicentric study to evaluate reliability of Guy’s stone score (GSS), the stone size, tract length, obstruction, number of involved calyces, and essence of stone (S.T.O.N.E.) nephrolithometry score and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) score in patients treated with minimally invasive PNL. MethodsWe evaluated SFRs and CRs of 222 adult patients treated with miniaturized PNL. Patients were considered stone-free if no residual fragments of any size at post-operative unenhanced computed tomography scan. Patients demographics, SFRs, and CRs were reported and analyzed. Performances of nomograms were evaluated with the area under the curve (AUC). ResultsWe included 222 patients, the AUCs of GSS, CROES score, and S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry score were 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61–0.78), 0.64 (95% CI 0.56–0.73), and 0.62 (95% CI 0.52–0.71), respectively. Regarding SFRs, at multivariate binomial logistic regression, only the GSS had significance with an odds ratio of 0.53 (95% CI 0.31–0.95, p=0.04). We did not find significant correlation with complications, with only a trend for GSS. ConclusionThis is the first study evaluating nomograms in miniaturized PNL. They still show good reliability; however, our data showed lower performances compared to standard PNL. We emphasize the need of further studies to confirm this trend. A dedicated nomogram for minimally invasive PNL may be necessary.

Does nephrolithometry scoring systems predict success and complications in miniPCNL?

Auxiliary nephrolithometric scoring systems (NSSs) have been developed to predict complications and treatment success of conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). However, to our knowledge, there is no study comparing these NSSs in patients undergoing miniPCNL. This study aimed to compare the NSSs in terms of their ability to predict miniPCNL-related complications and treatment success. The data of patients undergoing PCNL between September 2016 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed through the electronic medical record system, and 140 patients were included in our study. Stone-free status was evaluated using non-contrast computed tomography between 1 and 3months after the procedure. PCNL was considered successful if the patient was completely stone free. The postsurgical complications were classified according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification system. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) and STONE NSSs significantly predicted miniPCNL treatment success (p = 0.043, p = 0.018). However, the Guy's NSS did not significantly predict the treatment success (p = 0.415). Guy's, CROES and STONE NSSs were not found to significantly predict postsurgical complications (p = 0.584, p = 0.823, p = 0.189). To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first of its kind to investigate the ability of NSSs to predict treatment success and postsurgical complications in patients undergoing miniPCNL. The study found that STONE and CROES NSSs are independent parameters for predicting stone-free status after miniPCNL. In addition, our study found that none of the NSSs were useful in predicting postsurgical complications in patients undergoing miniPCNL.

A Prospective Study of Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with a Modified Technique: A Safe and Desirable Tool in the Armamentarium of Urologists

Introduction: Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has failed to gain popularity despite the various advantages, primarily due to a lack of standardised technique. A simple and replicable technique is needed to increase its popularity amongst urologists. Aim: To simplify and standardise the puncture technique of supine PCNL and compare it with the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) PCNL global study. Materials and Methods: A prospective interventional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India, between June-December 2020. A total of 82 consecutive patients underwent the procedure with a modified technique of initial puncture using bony landmarks. The results of present study were compared with the outcomes of the patients who underwent supine PCNL in the CROES PCNL global study which is the largest prospective database regarding the supine and prone positions of PCNL till date. Statistical analysis of various demographic variables, patient characteristics and results was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 software. Results: The mean age of patients was 47.52±13.044 years and mean stone burden of 266.146±172.430 mm2 . The mean operative time was 85.59±12.733 minutes. Lower calyceal puncture was done in 97.56% of patients. Stone clearance was achieved by a single puncture in 73 (89.0%) patients while 9 (11.0%) patients required two punctures. Sixteen patients (19.51%) had postnephrostomy drain removal leak which settled within 24 hours. Only in one patient the leak continued beyond 24 hours but was managed conservatively. On comparison, it was observed that mean stone burden was lesser (p-value=0.0001) and the stone free rate was comparatively higher in present study (p-value=0.024). Conclusion: Supine PCNL is an effective and safe procedure in a subset of patients with predominant lower calyceal stone bulk.

Comparative study between Guy's stone score, S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) nephrolithometric nomogram in predicting stone-free rates in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective analysis

Comparative study between Guy's stone score, S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) nephrolithometric nomogram in predicting stone-free rates in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective analysis

Comparison between OPEN STONE SURGERY vs PERCUTENOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY in Management of Renal Stones By Using S.T.O.N.E Nephrolithometry Scoring System

Abstract Background In spite of Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) became the first-line treatment option for patients with large and complex renal stones, there still remains a need of using open stone surgery (OSS) for removal of stones as a second or third line of treatment option. To date, 3 scoring systems have been proposed utilizing different metrics including the Guy’s Stone Score, S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry and the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) nomogram, and that used to assess and estimate the treatment success rate. Aim of the Work To evaluate and compare between OSS and PCNL in the management of renal stones by using the S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring system to predict and assess the stone free rate and the correlation with peri-operative complications in that two procedures. Patients and Methods A total 100 patients who need surgical intervention for renal stones were treated with OSS (35 pa ents) and PCNL (65 pa ents) from January 2019 ll the end of October 2019, were invited to participate in the present study. This was a multicenter, comparative, prospective cohort controlled study. This study was controlled by the standard results recorded in the previous literatures. Only adult(>18 ys. Old) patients with renal stone size ≥ 20mm were involved in the study. Peri-operative and follow-up data included stone free rate and complications were collected for all patients and were compared between both procedures. S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry scoring systems was applied to preoperative non-contrast computed tomography(CTUT) for all cases and compared the results of both procedures. Stone-free rate was diagnosed using early postoperative kidney, ureter, bladder X-rays(KUB) and another CTUT on the postoperative day30. Results There was a significant difference between the PCNL group and the OSS group in the primary stone free rate (90% and 97.5% respec vely, p-value=0.021), peri-operative major complications (3% and 14.3% respectively, p-value=0.033), opera ve me (123.46 ± 34.61 and 175.71 ± 55.10 respec vely, p-value=0.000) and postopera ve hospital stay (3.52 ± 0.84 and 5.23 ± 1.00 respec vely, p-value=0.000), while there was no significant difference in the intra-opera ve bleeding requiring blood transfusion (10.8% and 14.3% respec vely, pvalue=0.124). S.T.O.N.E score showed a significant difference between PCNL and OSS groups ( 7 (6-11) and 10 (7-12) respectively, p-value=0.000) and it also had a significant rela on with the outcome SFR (p-value=0.000) a er both PCNL and OSS(r= -0.581 and r= -0.567 respec vely), the higher the score, the lower the SFR and the higher the possibility of OSS choice. While this score had on relation with the peri-operative complications. Conclusion The S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry score was predictive of the stone-free status in both surgical procedures (PCNL and OSS) and can be used as an formal guidance for surgical planning and patient counseling. This score would be classified into two categories “low” score range from 5 to 8 recommend PCNL procedure with expec ng SFR of 88% to 97% and “high” score range from 9 to 12 recommend Open Stone Surgery with expec ng SFR of 90% to 96%, to reach the most acceptable results for each procedures to sa sfy the patient and the doctor. The S.T.O.N.E score was not associated with the peri-operative complications in both procedures.

Investigation of Factors Related to Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Failure in Horseshoe Kidneys and Comparison of Three Stone Scoring Systems in Prediction of Outcomes

Introduction: We aimed to identify factors affecting percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) outcomes among patients with horseshoe kidney (HSK) and assess the predictive accuracy of the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES), Guy’s Stone Score (GSS), and S.T.O.N.E. scoring systems. Methods: Data from 98 patients with HSK who underwent PNL between November 2010 and January 2020 were evaluated. Patients were divided into the stone-free (SF) and non-SF groups and compared according to demographic data, stone and surgical characteristics, and stone scoring systems. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with SF status. Results: Among the included patients, 87 were male and 11 were female (mean age: 47.37 ± 14.42 years). The SF rate was 84.7% (83 patients). Group analysis identified GSS (p < 0.001), CROES score (p < 0.001), S.T.O.N.E. score (p = 0.014), stone burden (p = 0.045), and multiplicity (p < 0.001) as factors associated with SF status. Among our cohort, 10 patients developed complications. All scoring systems were significantly correlated with SF status (CROES: r = −0.442, p < 0.001; GSS: r = 0.442, p < 0.001; S.T.O.N.E.: r = 0.250, p = 0.013), while CROES score was identified as an independent factor associated with SF status (95% CI: 0.937–0.987; p = 0.003). Conclusions: PNL is an effective method for treating nephrolithiasis among patients with HSK. Moreover, stone-related factors, such as larger size, multiplicity, and complexity, were associated with procedural failure. Finally, the CROES nomogram was a better predictor of SF status compared with other scoring systems.

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes Based on S.T.O.N.E., GUY, CROES, and S-ReSC Scoring Systems: The First Prospective Study.

Objective: To evaluate predictive capability and clinical applicability of the current nephrolithometric scoring systems of S.T.O.N.E. score, Guy's scoring system (GSS), CROES (Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society) nomogram, and S-ReSC (Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity) score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) outcomes in the same cohort in a prospective study. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing PCNL between 2015 and 2018 were included calculating the four scores in the same cohort. Stone-free status (SFS), complications, operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), fluoroscopy time, and length of hospital stay were investigated. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for predictive accuracy and regression analysis for predictors of SFS were performed. Results: In all, 162 PCNLs were accomplished and analyzed. Overall, SFS was 75.9% and complication rate was 30.9%. The mean acquisition time of scores was 52.9 ± 0.5 seconds for GSS, 05.1 ± 0.3 seconds for S.T.O.N.E. score, 224 ± 3.1 seconds for CROES, and 102.6 ± 3.5 seconds for S-ReSC score. SFS had the best association with CROES grade. Clavien grade was associated with S.T.O.N.E. score. Moreover, EBL and OT had best association with S-ReSC score. All scores had comparable predictive accuracy on ROC curves regarding SFS. Stone essence and tract length are not different in cases with residual stones. Number of involved calyces, single vs multiple stones and renal pelvic obstruction were significant predictors of SFS in regression analysis. Conclusion: The four scoring systems had comparable predictive accuracy for SFS. However, S.T.O.N.E. and S-ReSC scores were easily applicable and provided better association with EBL and OT compared with the GSS score. Number of involved calyces, stone multiplicity, and renal pelvic obstruction were significant predictors of SFS; hence, further studies are needed to invent a universally agreeable scoring system covering reported shortcomings in the currently used scores.

Outcomes of Ureterorenoscopic Stone Treatment in 301 Patients with a Solitary Kidney.

Objectives: To determine the stone-free rates and intra- and postoperative complication rates and grades of ureterorenoscopic stone treatment in patients with a solitary kidney. Methods: This study is a subanalysis of the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) ureterorenoscopy (URS) study, which is a prospective international multicenter observational study. Over a 1-year period, consecutive patients treated with ureterorenoscopy for urinary stones were included. Patients entered in this analysis were those with a solitary functioning kidney. Descriptive data on patient characteristics, stone-free rates, complication rates, and grades were evaluated for three separate groups: patients treated with ureteroscopy for ureteral stones, for renal stones, and a combination of renal and ureteral stones. Results: A total of 301 patients were treated for stones in a solitary kidney; 219 were treated for ureteral stones. In this group, the stone-free rate was 88.6%, with an intraoperative complication rate of 7.4% and postoperative complication rate of 4.1%. Totally, 57 patients were treated for renal stones. In this group, the stone-free rate was 56.4%, with an intraoperative complication rate of 7.0% and postoperative complication rate of 10.5%. There were 25 patients who were treated for renal stones in combination with ureter stones. In this group, the stone-free rate was 60.0%, with an intraoperative complication rate of 12.0% and postoperative complication rate of 10.5%. Within the three groups, 72% of the postoperative complications were classified as Clavien I and II. Conclusions: Ureteroscopy is an effective and safe treatment modality for the removal of ureteral and renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney. Stone location as well as total stone burden seems to be important factors influencing the ability to render patients stone free. Moreover, single session ureteroscopic stone removal was less effective for the treatment of larger renal stones or renal stones in combination with ureteral stones.

External validation and comparison of the scoring systems (S.T.O.N.E, GUY, CROES, S-ReSC) for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes for staghorn stones: A single center experience with 160 cases

The aim of this study was validation and comparison of stone scoring systems (S.T.O.N.E, GUY, CROES, S-ReSC) used to predict postoperative stone-free status and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for staghorn stones. A total of 160 patients who had staghorn renal stones and underwent PCNL between January 2012 and August 2015 were included in the current retrospective study. Guy, S.T.O.N.E., S-ReSC (Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity) and CROES (Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society) nephrolithometry scores were calculated for each patient, and their potential association with stone-free status, operative and fluoroscopy time, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were evaluated. Postoperative complications were graded according to the modified Clavien classification, and the correlation of scoring systems with postoperative complications was also investigated. The mean CROES, S.T.O.N.E, Guy and S-ReSC scores were 143.5 ± 33.6, 9.7 ± 1.6, 3.5 ± 0.5 and 6.2 ± 2.0 respectively. The overall stone-free rate was 59%. All scoring systems were significantly correlated with stone-free status in univariate analysis. However, Guy and S-ReSC scores were the only significant independent predictor in multivariate analysis. And all four nomograms failed to predict complication rates. Current study demonstrated that Guy and S-ReSC scoring systems could effectively predict postoperative stone-free status for staghorn stones. However all four scoring systems failed to predict complication rates.

Prediction of Pediatric Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes Using Contemporary Scoring Systems.

We evaluate the applicability of contemporary percutaneous nephrolithotomy scoring systems in pediatric patients and compare their predictive power regarding postoperative outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed the records of 125 children who were diagnosed with renal calculi and underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy between March 2011 and April 2016. Predictive scores, which consisted of Guy's Stone Score, S.T.O.N.E. (stone size, tract length, obstruction, number of involved calyces and essence/stone density) nephrolithometry and CROES (Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society) nomogram, were calculated for all patients included in the study. Patient demographics, stone-free rate and complications were all analyzed and are reported. Median Guy's Stone Score was 2 (IQR 2 to 3) in patients with residual stones (group 1) and 2 (1 to 2) in those who were stone-free (group 2). Median respective CROES nomogram scores were 215 (IQR 210 to 235) and 257 (240 to264), and S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scores were 8 (7 to 9) and 5 (5 to 6, all p<0.0001). S.T.O.N.E. score demonstrated the greatest accuracy in predicting stone-free rate. Guy's Stone Score was significantly correlated with complications but the CROES and S.T.O.N.E. scores were not significantly correlated with complications. The scoring systems analyzed could be used to predict success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric setting. However, further studies are needed to formulate modifications for use in children. The main variables in the scoring systems, ie stone burden, tract length and case volume, were measured using records from adult patients. Besides these variables, the relatively small pelvicalyceal system and higher incidence of anatomical malformations in children could potentially affect percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes.

Same Session Bilateral Ureteroscopy for Multiple Stones: Results from the CROES URS Global Study

This study presents a comparison of the international experience with ipsilateral and bilateral ureteroscopy for multiple, bilateral ureteral and renal stones vs single stone treatment. Patient and treatment characteristics and outcomes were compared. The CROES (Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society) Ureteroscopy Global Study includes 114 centers in 32 countries. Patients undergoing bilateral ureteroscopy, ipsilateral ureteroscopy for multiple stones and ureteroscopy for a single stone were examined from January 2010 to October 2012. Intraoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were identified for each patient. Inverse probability weighted regression adjustment analyses were done to compare outcomes independent of differences among centers and patient characteristics. The CROES Ureteroscopy Global Study consists of 11,885 patients. A total of 2,153 patients (18.7%) were treated for multiple stones, of whom 1,880 (87.3%) and 273 (12.7%) underwent ipsilateral and bilateral ureteroscopy, respectively. Inverse probability weighted regression adjustment models for bilateral vs ipsilateral ureteroscopy and multiple vs single stone treatments showed that patients with bilateral ureteroscopy and multiple stone treatments had lower stone-free rates, higher re-treatment rates and longer operative times compared to patients who underwent ipsilateral ureteroscopy and single stone treatment. There was no difference in complication rates among bilateral, ipsilateral and single stone ureteroscopy. This study presents a large series of patients who underwent bilateral and ipsilateral ureteroscopy. Our findings suggest a decrease in stone-free rates, increased re-treatment rates, increased operative times and longer hospital stay in patients treated for multiple stones. The treatment of multiple stones and bilateral ureteroscopy are safe compared to single stone treatment and ipsilateral ureteroscopy, respectively.

How practical is the application of percutaneous nephrolithotomy scoring systems? Prospective study comparing Guy’s Stone Score, S.T.O.N.E. score and the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) nomogram

ObjectiveTo prospectively compare the Guy’s Stone Score (GSS), S.T.O.N.E. [stone size (S), tract length (T), obstruction (O), number of involved calices (N), and essence or stone density (E)] score and the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) nephrolithometric nomogram to predict percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) success rate and assess the correlation with perioperative complications. Patients and methodsWe prospectively evaluated all consecutive PCNL patients at our institute between 1 November 2013 and 31 May 2015. The above scoring systems were applied to preoperative non-contrast computed tomography and the practical difficulties in such applications were noted. Perioperative complications and the stone-free rate (SFR) were also recorded. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn and the areas under curves were compared and appropriate statistical analysis done. ResultsIn all, 48 renal units were included in the study. The overall SFR was 62.2%. The presence of staghorn stones (β=27.285, 95% confidence interval 1.19–625.35; P=0.039) was the only significant variable associated with the residual stones on multivariate analysis. Stone-free patients had significantly lower median GSS (2 vs 4) and S.T.O.N.E. scores (6 vs 10) and higher median CROES scores (83% vs 63%) (all P<0.001) compared to residual-stone patients. All scoring systems were significantly associated with SFR (all P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the areas under curves of the scoring systems (0.858, 0.923, and 0.931, respectively). Furthermore, all scoring systems had weak correlations with Clavien–Dindo classified complications (r=0.29, P=0.045; r=0.40, P=0.005 and r=−0.295, P=0.04, respectively). We found no standardisation for the measurement of stone dimensions, tract length, Hounsfield units, and staghorn definition. ConclusionsAll scoring systems equally predicted SFR and had a weak correlation with Clavien–Dindo complications. Standardisation is needed for the variables in which they have been found deficient.

The Influence of Body Mass Index on Outcomes in Ureteroscopy: Results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society URS Global Study.

Although ureteroscopy (URS) has been established as a viable treatment for stones in obese patients, its safety and success has not been fully elucidated. The current study describes the worldwide prevalence of obesity in patients with urolithiasis and examines trends in URS outcomes, safety, and efficacy. This study utilized the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) URS Global Study, which was a prospective, multicenter study including 11,885 patients treated with URS for urinary stones at 1 of 114 urology departments across 32 countries. The relationship between body mass index (BMI), diabetes, and creatinine, with retreatment, stone-free rates, complications, and long hospital stay, was examined with a multivariate logistic regression analyses. Of the 10,099 URS patients with BMI data, 17.4% were obese and 2.2% were super obese. Overall, 86.7% patients were stone free and 16.8% required retreatment. Higher BMI was associated with lower stone-free rates, and any deviation from normal weight was associated with higher retreatment rates. In multivariate analysis controlling for several variables including stone size, the association between BMI and lower stone-free rates with higher retreatment rates persisted. Intraoperative complications occurred in 518 (5.1%) patients, and 343 (3.4%) experienced a postoperative complication. Postoperative complications were more frequent in the underweight and super obese subjects, and there was no relationship between BMI and intraoperative complications. Although URS for stone disease was found to be an overall safe procedure for obese and super obese patients, efficacy of the procedure may be lower compared with normal-weight subjects and higher retreatment rates may be necessary.

Examining Pediatric Cases From the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study

To evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of ureteroscopy (URS) in children treated in several hospitals participating in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) Study, and to present the overall results of pediatric URS compared with adults. The CROES Study collected data on consecutive patients treated with URS for urolithiasis at each participating center over a 1-year period. The collected prospective global database includes data for 11,885 patients who received URS at 114 centers in 32 countries. Of these URS-treated patients, 192 were ≤18 years old. Of the 114 centers participating in the study, 42% had conducted pediatric URS. Among the pediatric cases, 7 were infants, 53 were small children, 59 were school-aged children, and 73 were adolescents. A considerable number (37%) of the pediatric cases had previously undergone URS treatment. No differences in the surgical outcomes of the adults and children were reported. The URS-treated children had a greater number of positive preoperative urine cultures when compared with adult cases treated. A semirigid scope was used in the vast majority of pediatric cases (85%). According to the present data, within the group of URS-treated children, the younger the child, the more readmissions occurred. URS is as efficient and safe in children as it is in adults. The data suggest that readmissions among URS-treated children are associated with age, with the likelihood of readmissions greater among younger age groups.

News from Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES)

News from Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES)

Prognostic Impact of Stone-Scoring Systems After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Staghorn Calculi: A Single Center's Experience Over 10 Years.

To investigate the prognostic factors associated with stone-free rate (SFR) and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of staghorn stone and to compare the predictive value and accuracy of three stone-scoring systems for the treatment success of staghorn stone. We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing PCNL at our center from June 2003 to June 2014. On the basis of noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) scan images, we calculated Guy's score, S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry, and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) nomogram to assess the association with stone-free status and complications. For statistical evaluation, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used. During the study period, 886 cases had medical records available. Cases who underwent PCNL for the treatment of staghorn calculi accounted for 34.4% (305/886 cases). Preoperative NCCT was performed in 217 cases. The 217 procedures (205 patients, 12 simultaneous bilateral PCNLs) had a mean stone size of 1358.3 ± 760.7 mm(2), with 111 (51.2%) partial staghorn and 106 (48.8%) complete staghorn stones. The initial and overall SFRs of PCNL were 53.9% and 70.1%, respectively. The overall complication rate was 32.7% (71/217 cases). On a multivariate logistic regression analysis, independent predictors for SFR were number of involved calices, S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry, and pre-existent urinary tract infection (UTI) (odds ratios [ORs] = 1.311, 1.933, and 2.340, respectively). Stone burden was an independent risk factor for the development of complications on multivariate analysis (OR = 2.846 and p = 0.001). The results of this study show that multiple involved calices, high grades of S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry, and pre-existent UTIs were associated with lower SFR after PCNL for staghorn calculi. Stone burden was an independent risk factor for the development of complications.

Interobserver Reliability and Reproducibility of the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Nomogram in Predicting Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Results

To assess interobserver reliability and reproducibility of the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) nephrolithometric nomogram. Preoperative data and postoperative outcomes of 100 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy were obtained. Patients' data were reviewed separately by 4 independent urologists of different academic level: an experienced attending endourologist, a graduated fellow, a young fellow, and a resident. Each rater adjusted a CROES score in all 100 patients. Interobserver reliability was analyzed by assessing intraclass correlation (ICC) and kappa coefficient among and between all different raters. Assessment of interobserver reliability showed good or excellent agreement among all raters. Moderate agreement was only found between the raters for the "presence of staghorn" score. ICCs among all raters expressed excellent levels for each independent CROES parameter and reached great statistical significance. The highest correlation was noticed for "stone burden" in contrast to "presence of staghorn" parameter that showed the lowest. ICC for the final CROES score revealed good to excellent agreement among all raters and all pairs of raters. CROES nephrolithometry is a reproducible nomogram. Reproducible results were obtained within a single institution by multiple reviewers of varying experience within a short period of time after undergoing standardized training.

Not Available

Journal of EndourologyVol. 30, No. 7 News from Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES)Published Online:11 Jul 2016https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.29017.croAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 30Issue 7Jul 2016 InformationCopyright 2016, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Journal of Endourology.Jul 2016.723-726.http://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.29017.croPublished in Volume: 30 Issue 7: July 11, 2016Online Ahead of Print:June 16, 2016PDF download