Clinical Quality Measures Research Articles

The Association of Hospital-Cardiologist Integration With Patient Outcomes, CareQuality, and Utilization.

Cardiologists are increasingly moving from independent practice to direct employment by hospitals. Hospital employment has the potential to improve care coordination and delivery, but little is known about its effect on care quality and outcomes. In this study, we sought to assess the association between hospital employment of cardiologists and patient outcomes, care quality, and utilization among patients hospitalized with incident acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or heart failure (HF). We used a sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries hospitalized with incident AMI or HF from 2008 to 2019. We identified the accountable cardiologists that cared for these patients and determined their employment status by means of tax identification numbers. We used difference-in-differences methods to compare clinical outcomes, quality measures, and utilization for patients treated by hospital-employed cardiologists after switching from independent to hospital-employed practice, to outcomes for patients treated by cardiologists who remained independent. Models were adjusted for time trends and patient, hospital, and cardiologist characteristics. Patient outcomes were in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission. Quality measures were receipt of: 1) a guideline-recommended test to assess cardiac function; and 2) a 30-day follow-up clinic visit. Utilization measures were length of stay and, for AMI patients, the proportion receiving coronary revascularization. The proportion of U.S. cardiologists employed by hospitals increased from 26% in 2008 to 63% in 2019. We identified 186,052 AMI and 259,849 HF patients cared for by cardiologists who switched to hospital employment and 168,052 AMI and 245,769 HF patients cared for by independent cardiologists. Patient characteristics were similar (mean age 80.8 years; 47% men). We found no significant differences in outcomes (eg, adjusted difference in 30-day mortality 0.03% [95%CI:-0.39% to 0.45%] for AMI patients and-0.05% [95%CI:-0.37% to 0.27%] for HF patients); no differences in most quality metrics except a small increase in the proportion of HF patients with 30-day follow-up (adjusted difference: 1.04%; 95%CI: 0.46%-1.62%); and no differences in utilization between patients treated by hospital-employed cardiologists (postswitch) vs independent cardiologists. Among U.S. cardiologists, there has been a large shift from independent practice to direct employment by hospitals. We found minimal evidence that cardiologist employment by hospitals improves care quality or outcomes.

Decreased trabecular bone score in patients affected by Fabry disease.

Fabry disease (FD) is an inherited X-linked lysosomal storage disease characterized by increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures. The impact of FD on clinical measures of bone quality is unknown. This considered, aim of our study was to evaluate whether trabecular bone microarchitecture, measured by trabecular bone score (TBS), is altered in patients with FD compared to control subjects. This retrospective monocentric study enrolled 14 patients (M/F 1/1, median age 46 [37-63] years, range 31-72 years) newly diagnosed with FD between January 2016 and July 2023 who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) image at the time of diagnosis and 42 matched controls. In all subjects, data about bone mineral density (BMD) and lumbar spine TBS were collected and total calcium, parathyroid hormone (PTH), 25(OH) vitamin D, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were evaluated. In subjects with FD, globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb3), 24-hour proteinuria and albumin-creatinine ratio were also assessed. Patients with FD presented significantly lower lumbar spine TBS (1.29 [1.22-1.38] vs. 1.42 [1.39-1.47], p < 0.001) and lower lumbar spine BMD (0.916 ± 0.166 vs. 1.031 ± 0.125g/cm2, p = 0.008) compared to controls; moreover, FD was shown to be an independent risk factor for both low lumbar spine TBS (β = -0.118, p < 0.001) and BMD (β = -0.115, p = 0.009). No differences were found in serum calcium, ALP, 25(OH) vitamin D and eGFR in both groups, but FD patients had significantly higher PTH levels compared to controls (p = 0.016). Finally, 8 patients with FD presented either moderately or severely increased albuminuria and only 2 patients presented normal lyso-Gb3 levels. Patients affected by FD present significantly lower lumbar spine TBS and BMD compared to controls. Our findings strongly support the importance of carrying out a thorough evaluation of bone status in all patients affected by FD at baseline.

Conference Report: Leveraging the Global Malnutrition Composite Score for Quality Improvement, Health Equity, and Better Patient Outcomes

Effective January 2024, the United States Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) for the first time has included a nutrition-focused quality measure in the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program: the Global Malnutrition Composite Score (GMCS). The GMCS is an electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) that hospitals can choose to report voluntarily to meet the requirements for IPPS IQR payments. The GMCS can help improve hospital malnutrition care and help advance hospital health equity goals. This conference report summarizes a panel discussion at the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Food and Nutrition Conference &amp; Expo in October 2023. During the panel, four health and nutrition experts described strategies for integrating the GMCS into hospital electronic health records (EHRs). They also outlined how GMCS data can be used to facilitate successful patient transitions to post-acute care through addressing food insecurity and other reasons for malnutrition. Such strategies can serve to help avoid preventable complications and readmissions, improve patient outcomes and health, and meet quality and health equity objectives, while helping reduce overall healthcare costs.

2024 Update to the 2020 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With Heart Failure: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Performance Measures.

This document describes performance measures for heart failure that are appropriate for public reporting or pay-for-performance programs and is meant to serve as a focused update of the "2020 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures." The new performance measures are taken from the "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines" and are selected from the strongest recommendations (Class 1 or Class 3). In contrast, quality measures may not have as much evidence base and generally comprise metrics that might be useful for clinicians and health care organizations for quality improvement but are not yet appropriate for public reporting or pay-for-performance programs. New performance measures include optimal blood pressure control in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and the use of guideline-directed medical therapy in hospitalized patients. New quality measures include the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction, the optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy prior to intervention for chronic secondary severe mitral regurgitation, continuation of guideline-directed medical therapy for patients with heart failure with improved ejection fraction, identifying both known risks for cardiovascular disease and social determinants of health, patient-centered counseling regarding contraception and pregnancy risks for individuals with cardiomyopathy, and the need for a monoclonal protein screen to exclude light chain amyloidosis when interpreting a bone scintigraphy scan assessing for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.

Adherence to Non-operative Clinical Quality Measures in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Background: Clinical quality measures exist for non-operative management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Factors predicting adherence are unclear. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with chronic CTS using MarketScan Research Database (2015-2020) was conducted. Six logistic regression models were designed to study adherence to quality measures within 1 year after diagnosis. Results: Of 782,717 patients identified, 514,073 (65.7%) were female with an average (SD) age of 51.4 (13.4) years. Only 88 patients (0.01%) met all quality measures. Greatest compliance observed with receipt of nerve conduction study (NCS; 283,959 [36.3%]), no prescription of medications (336,297 [43.0%]) and no laser therapy (772,979 [98.8%]); 294,305 patients (37.6%) received hand surgeon referral. Hand surgeon referral predicted higher likelihood of NCS and splinting (OR, 1.83; 95% CI: 1.81-1.84; OR, 2.53; 95% CI: 2.50-2.56) and medication over-prescription (OR, 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00-1.10). Females were more likely to be referred to a hand surgeon and be referred for splinting (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03; OR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.18-1.21) but less likely to have no prescriptions or avoid laser therapy (OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.84-0.85; OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.79-0.86). Medicare recipients adhered less to quality measures compared to patients with fee-for-service insurance. As comorbidities increased, patients were less likely to receive hand surgeon referral and carpal tunnel release. Conclusions: Findings suggest that hand surgery referrals increased adherence to quality measures. Females, Medicare recipients and multimorbid patients should be targeted for improved care. Future quality care efforts should incentivise adherence for Medicare beneficiaries and improve guideline recognition amongst physicians. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Amplify Gait to Improve Locomotor Engagement in Spinal Cord Injury (AGILE SCI) trial: study protocol for an assessor blinded randomized controlled trial

BackgroundAmong ambulatory people with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI), balance deficits are a primary factor limiting participation in walking activities. There is broad recognition that effective interventions are needed to enhance walking balance following iSCI. Interventions that amplify self-generated movements (e.g., error augmentation) can accelerate motor learning by intensifying sensorimotor feedback and facilitating exploration of motor control strategies. These features may be beneficial for retraining walking balance after iSCI. We have developed a cable-driven robot that creates a movement amplification environment during treadmill walking. The robot applies a continuous, laterally-directed, force to the pelvis that is proportional in magnitude to real-time lateral velocity. Our purpose is to investigate the effects of locomotor training in this movement amplification environment on walking balance. We hypothesize that for ambulatory people with iSCI, locomotor training in a movement amplification environment will be more effective for improving walking balance and participation in walking activities than locomotor training in a natural environment (no applied external forces).MethodsWe are conducting a two-arm parallel-assignment intervention. We will enroll 36 ambulatory participants with chronic iSCI. Participants will be randomized into either a control or experimental group. Each group will receive 20 locomotor training sessions. Training will be performed in either a traditional treadmill environment (control) or in a movement amplification environment (experimental). We will assess changes using measures that span the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework including 1) clinical outcome measures of gait, balance, and quality of life, 2) biomechanical assessments of walking balance, and 3) participation in walking activities quantified by number of steps taken per day.DiscussionTraining walking balance in people with iSCI by amplifying the individual’s own movement during walking is a radical departure from current practice and may result in new strategies for addressing balance impairments. Knowledge gained from this study will expand our understanding of how people with iSCI improve walking balance and how an intervention targeting walking balance affects participation in walking activities. Successful outcomes could motivate development of clinically feasible tools to replicate the movement amplification environment within clinical settings.Trial registrationNCT04340063.

Effect of Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction on Venous Hemodynamics Evaluated Using Digital Photoplethysmography in Patients with Chronic Venous Disease

Micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF) is the most widely prescribed and well-studied venoactive drug available for the treatment of chronic venous disease (CVD). Photoplethysmography (PPG) is used to quantitatively measure venous hemodynamics and provide information about the overall function of the venous system. The aim of this study was to use digital PPG to evaluate the effects of MPFF on venous hemodynamics in patients with CVD. Patients diagnosed with CVD at an outpatient clinic in Bursa, Turkey between February 2018 and July 2020 were assessed for inclusion in this retrospective analysis. Patients who complied with the advised treatment strategy (MPFF 1,000mg tablets taken orally once daily and compression garments) and attended follow-up visits were included in the analysis. Digital PPG was used to measure venous refilling time (VRT) and venous pumping capacity (VPC) at diagnosis and 6months of follow-up. The Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) was also obtained at these visits, and patients completed the 20-item Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ-20). In total, 721 patients (mean age 52years) with C0-C4 CVD were included in the study. PPG showed that VRT and VPC increased significantly from 19.0sec to 2.0%, respectively, at diagnosis to 27.4 and 4.9%, respectively, at 6months (both P<0.05). Mean VCSS improved significantly from 7.9 at diagnosis to 3.1 at 6months (P<0.05). Mean CIVIQ-20 score also improved significantly at the 6-month follow-up (20.1 vs 38.6 at diagnosis; P<0.01). In patients with C0-C4 CVD, 6months of MPFF treatment plus the wearing of compression garments was associated with statistically significant improvements in venous hemodynamic parameters measured by PPG, as well as measures of clinical severity and quality of life.

Implementation of kidney palliative care-lessons learned from the US Department of Veterans Affairs.

Advanced kidney disease is a progressive life-limiting illness associated with high symptom burden, disability, and highly intensive care near the end of life. There is growing interest in integrating palliative care principles into the care of patients with advanced kidney disease to improve care and outcomes for these patients. The United States (US) Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has been a leader in advancing palliative care initiatives across its health system and whose experience and approach may be instructive to other health systems seeking to develop kidney palliative care (KPC) services. Herein, we review current KPC programs in the VA and highlight the different models of care that programs have been adopted and how key components of goals of care conversations and advance care planning, symptom management, multidisciplinary care, patient selection, and quality improvement have been implemented across programs. VA KPC programs have adopted "parallel", "merged", and "embedded" models of KPC that reflect the different configurations of partnerships between nephrology and palliative care providers to deliver KPC. A primary service of VA KPC programs is providing goals of care conversations and advance care planning to referred patients and systematically documenting the outcomes of these discussions in standardized note templates in the electronic medical record. Symptom management is delivered by KPC providers through regular shared or sequential visits with patients' nephrology providers and is guided by patient responses to validated symptom surveys. Programs are staffed by allied health professionals, such as chaplains, pharmacists, social workers, and dieticians, to provide whole-person care and regularly huddle with nephrology staff to reach a shared understanding of each patient's care needs and plan. KPC programs implement champions who select patients in greatest need of KPC using a combination of clinical events that trigger referral for KPC and validated mortality risk prediction scores that are automatically generated in each patient's medical record. KPC programs also routinely collect clinical, patient-reported, process, and care quality measures to assess its services. The experiences of the VA highlight novel approaches that strive to close the care gaps in meeting the KPC needs of patients with advanced kidney disease.

Using a Cohort-Based Quality Improvement Coaching Model to Optimize Chronic Disease Management for Federally Qualified Health Center Patients.

In fall 2020, Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County, in collaboration with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, launched a 3-year, cohort-based quality improvement (QI) coaching program to assist Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in improving their clinical management of hypertension, high blood cholesterol, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. The QI program utilized a cohort-based coaching model in which 5 FQHCs were each assigned a practice transformation coach who provided them with guidance and support to monitor clinical quality measures. These measures were then used to facilitate changes and improvements in clinical workflows and approaches to patient care. To encourage peer learning and promote inter-organizational collaboration, the coaching team hosted quarterly cohort check-ins and an online group messaging board where the participating FQHCs could share lessons learned. Throughout the program, the FQHCs were provided trainings and resources to advance their clinical quality measures of choice. To implement the program, each FQHC selected 2 clinical quality measures to focus on, completing a minimum of 1 Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle per year for each measure. Throughout, the coaches met regularly with FQHC staff to discuss progress, strategize on how best to address challenges encountered, and identify training or resource needs for their clinic sites. To drive implementation of QI interventions and monitor overall progress, the FQHCs reported quarterly on the clinical quality measures being addressed. By program's end, all 5 FQHCs reached their 10% improvement goals. This QI coaching program allowed participating FQHCs to build new competencies and achieve measurable improvements in how they managed their patients' chronic diseases. This model of practice serves as a promising approach for achieving sustainable clinical improvements in these FQHCs.

Development of a Consensus-Derived Synoptic Operative Report for Rectal Prolapse: A Report From the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium.

Narrative operative reports may omit or obscure data from an operation. To develop a synoptic operative report for rectal prolapse that includes core descriptors as developed by an international consensus of expert pelvic floor surgeons. Descriptors for patients undergoing rectal prolapse surgery were generated through review. Members of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium were recruited to participate in a 3-round Delphi process using a 9-point Likert scale. Descriptors that achieved 70% agreement were kept from the first round, and descriptors scoring 40% to 70% agreement were recirculated in subsequent rounds. A final list of operative descriptors was determined at a consensus meeting, with a final consensus meeting more than 70% agreement. This survey was administered to members of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium. No patient data are included in this study. Descriptors meeting greater than 70% agreement were selected. One hundred seventy-six surgeons representing colorectal surgeons, urogynecologists, and urologists distributed throughout North America (56%), Latin America (4%), Western Europe (29%), Asia (4%), and Africa (1%) participated in the first round of Delphi voting. After 2 additional rounds and a final consensus meeting, 16 of 30 descriptors met 70% consensus. Descriptors that met consensus were surgery type, posterior dissection, ventral dissection, mesh used, type of mesh used, mesh location, sutures used, suture type, pouch of Douglas and peritoneum reclosed, length of rectum imbricated, length of bowel resected, levatoroplasty, simultaneous vaginal procedure, simultaneous gynecologic procedure, simultaneous enterocele repair, and simultaneous urinary incontinence procedure. The survey represents the views of members of the Delphi panel and may not represent the viewpoints of all surgeons. This Delphi survey establishes international consensus descriptors for intraoperative variables that have been used to produce a synoptic operative report. This will help establish defined operative reporting to improve clinical communication, quality measures, and clinical research. See Video Abstract . ANTECEDENTES:Los protocolos operativos narrativos frecuentemente pueden omitir u oscurecer datos de un procedimiento.OBJETIVO:Nuestro objetivo es desarrollar un protocolo operatorio sinóptico para el prolapso rectal que incluya descriptores básicos desarrollados por un consenso internacional de cirujanos expertos en piso pélvico.DISEÑO:Los descriptores para pacientes sometidos a cirugía de prolapso rectal se generaron mediante revisión. Se reclutó a miembros del Consorcio de Trastornos del Piso Pélvico para participar en un proceso Delphi de 3 rondas utilizando una escala Likert de 9 puntos. Los descriptores que lograron un 70% de acuerdo se mantuvieron en la primera ronda, los descriptores que obtuvieron un 40-70% de acuerdo se recircularon en rondas posteriores. Se determinó una lista final de descriptores operativos en una reunión de consenso, con una reunión de consenso final de más del 70% de acuerdo.ESCENARIO:Esta fue una encuesta administrada a miembros del Consorcio de Trastornos del Piso Pélvico.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se seleccionaron los descriptores que cumplieron más del 70% de acuerdo.RESULTADOS:Ciento setenta y seis cirujanos en representación de cirujanos colorrectales, uroginecólogos y urólogos distribuidos en América del Norte (56%), América Latina (4%), Europa Occidental (29%), Asia (4%) y África (1%) participaron en la primera ronda de votación Delphi. Después de dos rondas adicionales y una reunión de consenso final, 16 de 30 descriptores alcanzaron un 70% de consenso. Los descriptores que alcanzaron consenso fueron: tipo de cirugía, disección posterior, disección ventral, malla utilizada, tipo de malla utilizada, ubicación de la malla, suturas utilizadas, tipo de sutura, cierre del fondo de saco de Douglas y peritoneo, longitud del recto superpuesto, longitud del intestino resecado, plastía de los elevadores , procedimiento vaginal simultáneo, procedimiento ginecológico simultáneo, reparación simultánea de enterocele y procedimiento simultáneo de incontinencia urinaria.LIMITACIONES:La encuesta representa las opiniones de los miembros del panel Delphi y puede no representar los puntos de vista de todos los cirujanos.CONCLUSIONES/DISCUSIÓN:Esta encuesta Delphi establece descriptores de consenso internacional para las variables intraoperatorias que se han utilizado para producir un protocolo operatorio sinóptico. Esto ayudará a establecer protocolos operativos definidos para mejorar la comunicación clínica, las medidas de calidad y la investigación clínica. (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

The Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Impacting malnutrition care.

The presence and impact of malnutrition in adult hospitalized patients has been well documented by a significant body of literature. However, current malnutrition care practices often vary widely and frequently lack standardization. The Global Malnutrition Composite Score (GMCS), the first nutrition-related electronic clinical quality measure, is intended to evaluate the quality of malnutrition care provided to inpatient adults. This measure aims to aid in standardizing malnutrition care through performance measurement. The four components of the measure (nutrition screening, nutrition assessment, malnutrition diagnosis, and nutrition care plans) follow the well-established Nutrition Care Process and encourage the use of standardized terminology. Facilities with high-performance scores on the GMCS are likely to experience improved outcomes associated with high-quality malnutrition care.

Electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) concordance and quality care disparities among patients with breast cancer (BC).

e23237 Background: BC mortality is decreasing steadily, yet disparities in treatment and outcomes persist. eCQMs are metrics specified in a standard electronic format using data from electronic health records (EHR) and other systems to measure care quality. CancerLinQ is a health technology platform aggregating EHR data from ~7M patients (pts) seen in US oncology practices and cancer centers. This analysis assesses odds of non-concordance with 4 BC-specific eCQMs in CancerLinQ. Methods: Pts actively treated for BC in 2021 in CancerLinQ data were included in this study. The following four practice-level eCQMs were assessed as proportions of BC pts who: eCQM1 – Undergo HER2 testing eCQM2 – Are &lt; age 70 with early-stage, hormone receptor (HR) negative BC who receive combination chemotherapy &lt; 4 months of dx eCQM3 – Have early-stage, HER2+ BC and receive trastuzumab eCQM4 – Have early-stage, HR+ BC and receive tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) &lt; 1-year of dx Ethnicity, race, age at dx, pt/practice rural status, and practice type were assessed as covariates. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for associations among study variables and receipt of guideline non-concordant care. Results: aORs (95% CI) of pt characteristics were compared to reference groups - non-Hispanic, white, age at dx 60-69, married, urban: eCQM1 (N = 21296): For unknown ethnicity, aOR (95% CI) = 1.5 (1.3 1.6); unknown race = 1.3 (1.2, 1.5); age 70-79 = 1.1 (1.0, 1.2), age 80-89 = 1.4 (1.2, 1.5), age &gt; 90 = 1.5 (1.1, 2.2); formerly married/partnered = 1.2 (1.1, 1.3), thus having greater odds of non-concordance. Age 40-49, aOR (95% CI) = 0.9 (0.8, 0.986), had lower odds of non-concordance. eCQM2 (N = 1259): For unknown ethnicity, aOR (95% CI) = 1.9 (1.2, 3.1); Asian = 2.9 (1.7, 4.9) or other race = 2.3 (1.2, 4.1); and formerly married/partnered = 1.7 (1.2, 2.6), thus having greater odds of non-concordance. Pts age &lt; 40 = 0.6 (0.3, 0.9) had lower odds of non-concordance. eCQM3 (N = 1341): Age &gt; 80, aOR (95% CI) = 3.8 (1.5, 9.1), had greater odds of non-concordance. eCQM4 (N = 5063): For age &lt; 40, aOR (95% CI) = 2.9 (2.1, 4.1), age 40-49 = 1.6 (1.2, 2.0), and age 50-59 = 1.5 (1.2, 1.9); and formerly married/partnered = 1.3 (1.1, 1.7), thus having greater odds of non-concordance. Conclusions: As expected, pts &lt; 40 had greater odds of receiving chemotherapy and pts &gt; 80 had lower odds of receiving trastuzumab, possibly due to cardiotoxicity concerns. Although all women with early-stage HR+ BC are potential tamoxifen/AI candidates, pts &lt; 60 with early-stage HR+ BC had greater odds of not receiving tamoxifen/AI compared to those age 60-69. Additionally, divorced, separated, or widowed pts had greater odds of non-concordant care in 3 of 4 of eCQMs assessed. Our findings demonstrate the ability of eCQMs to identify clinical subgroups more likely to receive non-concordant care who may be eligible for targeted interventions.

Implementation of an electronic health record system during global surgical outreach: A prospective evaluation of success and sustainability.

The burden of musculoskeletal conditions continues to grow in low- and middle-income countries. Among thousands of surgical outreach trips each year, few organizations electronically track patient data to inform real-time care decisions and assess trip impact. We report the implementation of an electronic health record (EHR) system utilized at point of care during an orthopedic surgical outreach trip. In March 2023, we implemented an EHR on an orthopedic outreach trip to guide real-time care decisions. We utilized an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 3 design to evaluate implementation success. Success was measured using outcomes adopted by the World Health Organization, including acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, adoption, fidelity, and sustainability. Clinical outcome measures included adherence to essential quality measures and follow-up numerical rating system (NRS) pain scores. During the 5-day outreach trip, 76 patients were evaluated, 25 of which underwent surgery beforehand. The EHR implementation was successful as defined by: mean questionnaire ratings of acceptability (4.26), appropriateness (4.12), feasibility (4.19), and adoption (4.33) at least 4.00, WHO behaviorally anchored rating scale ratings of fidelity (6.8) at least 5.00, and sustainability (80%) at least 60% follow-up at 6months. All clinical quality measures were reported in greater than 80% of cases with all measures reported in 92% of cases. NRS pain scores improved by an average of 2.4 points. We demonstrate successful implementation of an EHR for real-time clinical use on a surgical outreach trip. Benefits of EHR utilization on surgical outreach trips may include improved documentation, minimization of medical errors, and ultimately improved quality of care.

Achieving Equity in EMS Care and Patient Outcomes Through Quality Management Systems: A Position Statement

Improving health and safety in our communities requires deliberate focus and commitment to equity. Inequities are differences in access, treatment, and outcomes between individuals and across populations that are systemic, avoidable, and unjust. Within health care in general, and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in particular, there are demonstrated inequities in the quality of care provided to patients based on a number of characteristics linked to discrimination, exclusion, or bias. Given the critical role that EMS plays within the health care system, it is imperative that EMS systems reduce inequities by delivering evidence-based, high-quality care for the communities and patients we serve. To achieve equity in EMS care delivery and patient outcomes, the National Association of EMS Physicians recommends that EMS systems and agencies: make health equity a strategic priority and commit to improving equity at all levels. assess and monitor clinical and safety quality measures through the lens of inequities as an integrated part of the quality management process. ensure that data elements are structured to enable equity analysis at every level and routinely evaluate data for limitations hindering equity analysis and improvement. involve patients and community stakeholders in determining data ownership and stewardship to ensure its ongoing evolution and fitness for use for measuring care inequities. address biases as they translate into the quality of care and standards of respect for patients. pursue equity through a framework rooted in the principles of improvement science.

Sustainable Approach to Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Through Better Quality Measurement.

The US health care industry has broadly adopted performance and quality measures that are extracted from electronic health records and connected to payment incentives that hope to improve declining life expectancy and health status and reduce costs. While the development of a quality measurement infrastructure based on electronic health record data was an important first step in addressing US health outcomes, these metrics, reflecting the average performance across diverse populations, do not adequately adjust for population demographic differences, social determinants of health, or ecosystem vulnerability. Like society as a whole, health care must confront the powerful impact that social determinants of health, race, ethnicity, and other demographic variations have on key health care performance indicators and quality metrics. Tools that are currently available to capture and report the health status of Americans lack the granularity, complexity, and standardization needed to improve health and address disparities at the local level. In this article, we discuss the current and future state of electronic clinical quality measures through a lens of equity.

Punished for Success? A Natural Experiment of Displaying Clinical Hospital Quality on Review Platforms

The healthcare market struggles with information asymmetry, limiting patients’ ability to make informed hospital choices. Aiming to bridge this gap, review platforms like Yelp have begun displaying hospitals’ clinical quality data alongside consumer reviews. However, our research uncovers that Yelp’s introduction of maternity care clinical quality measures unexpectedly resulted in lower subsequent Yelp ratings for high-quality hospitals with insufficient staffing. Employing precise foot traffic data and transfer deep learning, we discovered that high-quality, yet understaffed, hospitals experienced a surge in patient volume, which strained their resources and diminished patient satisfaction, leading to negative reviews. This finding has significant implications, signaling the unintended consequences of revealing clinical quality measures, including potential financial losses for hospitals because of reduced federal funding. This research not only contributes to our understanding the dynamics of patient satisfaction but also, offers actionable insights for high-quality hospitals to mitigate the negative impacts of unexpected visibility on review platforms. Our research underscores the importance for patients to discern between objective clinical quality measures and self-reported subjective ratings in their decision-making process. This research applies machine learning and transfer deep learning techniques to healthcare analytics, offering a deeper understanding of the interplay between information disclosure, online reviews, patient satisfaction, and hospital management.

Comparing HEDIS performance of Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans with other coverage types for dually eligible people.

People eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid coverage ("dually eligible individuals") have lower levels of income and assets and often higher health care needs and costs than those eligible for Medicare but not Medicaid coverage. Their 3 most common Medicare coverage options are Medicare Advantage (MA) Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans (D-SNPs), non-D-SNP MA plans, and fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare with a stand-alone prescription drug plan. No prior study has examined clinical quality of care for dually eligible individuals across these 3 coverage types. To fill that void, we used logistic regression to compare these coverage types on 6 HEDIS measures of clinical quality of care that were available for both MA and FFS (constructed from claims files). D-SNPs and non-D-SNP MA plans significantly outperformed FFS for all 6 measures for dually eligible individuals, by approximately 5 percentage points for 2 measures and by 18-34 percentage points for the other 4 measures. For the 4 measures with the greatest advantage over FFS, performance was 3-8 percentage points higher in D-SNPs than in non-D-SNP MA plans.

2024 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With Valvular and Structural Heart Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Performance Measures.

2024 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With Valvular and Structural Heart Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Performance Measures.

The Ability of Primary Care Practices to Measure and Report on Care Quality.

Creating useful clinical quality measure (CQM) reports in a busy primary care practice is known to depend on the capability of the electronic health record (EHR). Two other domains may also contribute: supportive leadership to prioritize the work and commit the necessary resources, and individuals with the necessary health information technology (IT) skills to do so. Here we describe the results of an assessment of the above 3 domains and their associations with successful CQM reporting during an initiative to improve smaller primary care practices' cardiovascular disease CQMs. The study took place within an AHRQ EvidenceNOW initiative of external support for smaller practices across Washington, Oregon and Idaho. Practice facilitators who provided this support completed an assessment of the 3 domains previously described for each of their assigned practices. Practices submitted 3 CQMs to the study team: appropriate aspirin prescribing, use of statins when indicated, blood pressure control, and tobacco screening/cessation. Practices with advanced EHR reporting capability were more likely to report 2 or more CQMs. Only one-third of practices were "advanced" in this domain, and this domain had the highest proportion of practices (39.1%) assessed as "basic." The presence of advanced leadership or advanced skills did not appreciably increase the proportion of practices that reported 2 or more CQMs. Our findings support previous reports of limited EHR reporting capabilities within smaller practices but extend these findings by demonstrating that practices with advanced capabilities in this domain are more likely to produce CQM reports.

New CMS Policy on the Mandatory Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty by 2027: What Orthopaedic Surgeons Should Know.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has finalized a landmark national policy to standardize and expand the collection and reporting of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This policy will be rolled out through phased implementation, beginning with voluntary reporting starting in 2023 and transitioning to mandatory reporting starting in 2025, which will be tied to hospital payment determinations in fiscal year 2028. The overarching goal of this policy is to gather meaningful pre- and postoperative PROM data directly from patients to enhance clinical care, shared decision-making, and quality measurement for these common elective procedures. This national initiative underscores the value of incorporating patient perspectives and priorities into assessments of surgical care quality. For orthopaedic surgeons and hospitals, participating in the initial voluntary reporting period provides an opportunity to integrate PROM collection into clinical workflows and to leverage these data to improve patient care. The achievement of robust PROM response rates and a strong performance on the underlying THA/TKA Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Performance Measure may have increasing relevance as payment models shift toward value-based care. The aim of the present forum was to provide an in-depth review of this new CMS policy and key details regarding required PROM instruments, data-collection time frames, and other specifications that surgical teams should understand as they prepare for implementation. The goal was to equip orthopaedic surgeons with actionable information as they embark on this new era of national PROM collection and reporting.