Use Of Clinical Practice Guidelines Research Articles

Clinical practice guidelines for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: A systematic review using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE) II instrument.

To systematically review, critically appraise the quality of recent clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), and map their recommendations. CPG databases (GIN, ECRI, NICE, SIGN, DynaMed), Bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL), and related specialized professional societies (e.g., AAP, CPS, BAPM, RCPCH, and SNS). Original de-novo developed evidence-based CPGs for HIE, group authorship, Arabic or English languages, and international or national scope. The systematic review was drafted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and Johnston et al methodological guide. Quality assessment of the included HIE CPGs by the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch & Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument and report their characteristics, AGREE II ratings, and recommendations. Our search retrieved 2,489 citations, of which two recent HIE CPGs were eligible and appraised: Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) and Queensland Maternity and Neonatal Services (QMN). The overall assessment of the QMN CPG was superior (83%). Domain 1 (Scope & Purpose) scored (47%, 63%), Domain 2 (Stakeholder Involvement) (72%, 39%), Domain 3 (Rigour of Development) (48%, 43%), Domain 4 (Clarity & Presentation) (100%, 96%), Domain 5 (Applicability) (59%, 9%), and Domain 6 (Editorial Independence) (67%, 17%) for the QMN and CPS CPGs respectively. All appraisers recommended the QMN CPG for use in practice. The methodological quality of the QMN CPG was superior with the relevant recommendations for its use in neonatal practice. limited to Arabic and English languages. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=258291, identifier: CRD42021258291.

Variation in clinical practice guidelines for use of palivizumab in preventing severe respiratory syncytial viral (RSV) disease in high-risk infants.

Uniformity and compliance with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for use of palivizumab in preventing severe respiratory syncytial viral infection in Australian high-risk infants remain unclear. An online survey was conducted across the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network (ANZNN) to determine clinical practices around palivizumab. A literature search was also performed to identify and compare national and international guidelines. A total of 65 of 422 ANZNN members completed the survey. Respondents included 61 senior medical staff of consultants/staff specialists (78%) and four nursing staff (6%). According to the survey, infants most likely to be recommended palivizumab included preterm infants born <29 weeks gestational age (GA) (30%), children with chronic lung diseases (CLDs) born <32 weeks GA (40%), and with hemodynamically significant heart disease (35%). Many of the respondents (53%) stated that CPGs for palivizumab were developed locally. Literature search identified 20 guidelines (10 international and 10 domestic); 16 (80%) recommended palivizumab use in preterm infants, 16 (80%) recommended use in infants with CLD, 17 (85%) in congenital heart disease and 6 (30%) in bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Eight (40%) guidelines provided specific recommendations for immunocompromised infants. Canada, Western Australia, and American Academy of Paediatrics provided recommendations for Indigenous children. Frequency and dosage of palivizumab was universal across all CPGs. None of the international guidelines obtained were from low- or middle-income countries. Standardization of CPGs may improve clinical decision making around use of palivizumab in high-risk infants.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Therapeutic Use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Therapeutic Use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders.

Pitch-side Acute Severe Pain Management Decisions in European Elite Football

This is the first study on acute severe pain management involving sport and exercise medicine Doctors who are leaders in football medicine in their respective countries. An online survey was designed describing the management of acute severe pain in this expert cohort. The survey captured participant sex, age, years working in sports medicine, core specialty and use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Finally, three clinical vignettes exploring the management of acute pain were presented. Forty-four senior team doctors across 55 European countries completed the survey. There were no consistent guidelines proposed, with 33 (75%) participants indicating they did not use any. Methoxyflurane was proposed by 14 (32%) and 13 (30%) participants for female anterior cruciate ligament rupture and male ankle fracture, respectively. Strong opioids were not used in 17 (39%) and 6 (14%) participants regarding female cruciate injuries and male fractures, respectively. Despite 75% of participants having paediatric life support training, eight (18%) participants expressed uncertainty administering medications in this population, and 15 (34%) would avoid using strong opioids altogether. There is a tendency to undertreat pain and avoid strong opioids for reasons including lack of monitoring equipment, anti-doping concerns and lack of comfort treating paediatric patients with opioids.

Guideline adherence and lost workdays for acute low back pain in the California workers' compensation system.

ContextThe use of clinical-practice guidelines is a suggested method for improving health outcomes by the earlier provision of necessary and effective medical interventions.ObjectiveTo quantify the influence of adherence to guideline-recommended interventions in the first week of treatment for an initial low back pain (LBP) injury on lost workdays.MethodsIn a retrospective cohort of California’s workers’ compensation claims data from May 2009 to May 2018, 41 diagnostic and treatment interventions were abstracted from the medical claims for workers with acute LBP injuries and compared with guideline recommendations. Lost workdays within 1-year post-injury were compared by guideline adherence using quantile regressions.ResultsOf the 59,656 workers who met the study inclusion criteria, 66.1% were male and the average (SD) age was 41 (12) years. The median number (IQR) of lost workdays was 27 (6–146) days. In the first week of treatment, 14.2% of workers received only recommended interventions, 14.6% received only non-recommended interventions, and 51.1% received both recommended and non-recommended interventions. Opioid prescriptions fell 86% from 2009 to 2018. Workers who received only guideline-recommended interventions experienced significantly fewer lost workdays (11.5 days; 95% CI: -13.9, -9.1), a 29.3% reduction, than workers who received only non-recommended interventions. The percentage of workers receiving only recommended interventions increased from 10.3% to 18.2% over the 9 years.Conclusion and relevanceWhen workers received guideline-recommended interventions, they typically returned to work in fewer days. The majority of workers received at least one non-recommended intervention, demonstrating the need for adherence to guideline recommendations. Fewer lost workdays and improved quality care are outcomes that strongly benefit injured workers.

The European Paediatric Rare Tumours Network - European Registry (PARTNER) project for very rare tumors in children.

The PARTNER project (Paediatric Rare Tumours Network - European Registry) was launched in 2016. PARTNER aims to create a European Registry dedicated to children and adolescents with very rare tumors (VRT). It links existing national registries and provides a registry for those countries in which a VRT registry has not yet been created. This consortium is composed of the various national cooperative groups and their respective member institutions. The strategic value of this project is based on the Europe-wide data collection concerning the treatment of VRTs. These data are provided to experts and constitute the basis for new clinical practice guidelines for use by ERN (European Reference Network) and non-ERN institutions. The proposed tasks and milestones will increase collaboration in the field of pediatric oncology among member states and will also facilitate the inclusion of low health expenditure average rate (LHEAR) countries in this process. In addition, this project creates a platform for VRTs that may represent a model on how to elaborate a comprehensive approach (case registration, international case consultation and treatment recommendations, and website to provide information for parents/patients) for rare diseases.

A comparative analysis of recommendations provided by clinical practice guideline for use of natural health products in the treatment of menopause-related vasomotor symptoms

ObjectivesTo systematically review Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) for the management of menopause-related vasomotor symptoms (VMS) to 1) identify those that include Natural Health Products (NHPs); 2) identify which NHPs were included and the evidence supporting the recommendation for the place in therapy; and 3) compare methodological quality of the CPGs. MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, BMJ Best Practice, DynaMed Plus and websites of gynecological and menopausal societies were searched (Jan 2000–Nov 2018). Records were screened to identify CPGs that were published in English, since 2000 and were for use in North America. CPGs were reviewed for inclusion of NHPs. Data regarding NHPs (evidence, recommendation) were extracted and analyzed. CPGs were critically appraised using the AGREE II tool. ResultsFive of six CPGs that met general inclusion criteria included NHPs. Black cohosh, isoflavones, soy food/extracts and phytoestrogens were included in all five CPGs. Comparative analysis of recommendations and level of supporting evidence revealed differences. All CPGs included recommendations regarding the use of NHPs in general, although recommendations differed. Four of five CPGs made recommendations for unique NHPs, however, recommendations differed. Using the AGREE II tool, CPGs scored well on domains for purpose and clarity. Lack of detailed description of methodology and author expertise affected scores in other domains. ConclusionFive CPGs included general recommendations for the role of NHPs in treating VMS, with recommendations ranging from use with caution to not recommended. There were inconsistencies among CPGs regarding NHPs included and what evidence was used in making recommendations.

Midwife or doctor local opinion leader to implement a national guideline in babies on postnatal wards (DesIGN): protocol of a cluster-randomised, blinded, controlled trial

IntroductionNeonatal hypoglycaemia is a common condition that can cause developmental delay. Treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia with oral dextrose gel has been shown to reverse hypoglycaemia and reduce admissions to neonatal...

High-Dose Opioid Prescribing and Opioid-Related Hospitalization: A Population-Based Study.

AimsTo examine the impact of national clinical practice guidelines and provincial drug policy interventions on prevalence of high-dose opioid prescribing and rates of hospitalization for opioid toxicity.DesignInterventional time-series analysis.SettingOntario, Canada, from 2003 to 2014.ParticipantsOntario Drug Benefit (ODB) beneficiaries aged 15 to 64 years from 2003 to 2014.InterventionsPublication of Canadian clinical practice guidelines for use of opioids in chronic non-cancer pain (May 2010) and implementation of Ontario’s Narcotics Safety and Awareness Act (NSAA; November 2011).MeasurementsThree outcomes were explored: the rate of opioid use among ODB beneficiaries, the prevalence of opioid prescriptions exceeding 200 mg and 400 mg morphine equivalents per day, and rates of opioid-related emergency department visits and hospital admissions.FindingsOver the 12 year study period, the rate of opioid use declined 15.2%, from 2764 to 2342 users per 10,000 ODB eligible persons. The rate of opioid use was significantly impacted by the Canadian clinical practice guidelines (p-value = .03) which led to a decline in use, but no impact was observed by the enactment of the NSAA (p-value = .43). Among opioid users, the prevalence of high-dose prescribing doubled (from 4.2% to 8.7%) over the study period. By 2014, 40.9% of recipients of long-acting opioids exceeded daily doses of 200 mg morphine or equivalent, including 55.8% of long-acting oxycodone users and 76.3% of transdermal fentanyl users. Moreover, in the last period, 18.7% of long-acting opioid users exceeded daily doses of 400 mg morphine or equivalent. Rates of opioid-related emergency department visits and hospital admissions increased 55.0% over the study period from 9.0 to 14.0 per 10,000 ODB beneficiaries from 2003 to 2013. This rate was not significantly impacted by the Canadian clinical practice guidelines (p-value = .68) or enactment of the NSAA (p-value = .59).ConclusionsAlthough the Canadian clinical practice guidelines for use of opioids in chronic non-cancer pain led to a decline in opioid prescribing rates among ODB beneficiaries these guidelines and subsequent Ontario legislation did not result in a significant change in rates of opioid-related hospitalizations. Given the prevalence of high dose opioid prescribing in this population, this suggests that improved strategies and programs for the safe prescribing of long-acting opioids are needed.

Consensus Recommendations from the Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group on the Use of High-dose Chemotherapy in Germ Cell Cancer

BackgroundHigh-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) has been studied in several clinical scenarios in advanced germ cell cancer (GCC). ObjectiveTo establish a clinical practice guideline for HDCT use in the treatment of GCC patients. Design, setting, and participantsAn expert panel reviewed information available from the literature. The panel addressed relevant issues concerning and related to HDCT. The guideline was externally reviewed by two international experts. Results and limitationsThe efficacy of HDCT has been demonstrated in selected GCC patients. The most conclusive evidence comes from retrospective analyses that need to be interpreted with caution. HDCT can cure a significant proportion of heavily treated GCC patients. When indicated, sequential HDCT with regimens containing carboplatin and etoposide, as well as peripheral stem-cell support, is recommended. There is no conclusive evidence to recommend HDCT as first-line therapy. According to a multinational retrospective pooled analysis, HDCT might be superior to conventional CT as first salvage treatment in selected patients. There is an urgent need for prospective clinical trials addressing the value of HDCT in GCC patients who experience failure on first-line cisplatin-based CT. In patients who progress on conventional-dose salvage CT, HDCT should be considered. Treatment of these patients at experienced centers is strongly recommended. ConclusionsIt has been demonstrated that HDCT cures selected GCC patients who experience disease progression on conventional rescue regimens. The panel recommends the inclusion of GCC patients in randomized clinical trials including HDCT. Patient summaryThis consensus establishes clinical practice guidelines for the use and study of high-dose chemotherapy in patients with germ cell cancer.

The Development and Implementation of a Bundled Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Inappropriate Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis

Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) with acid suppressive therapy is often inappropriately prescribed in the intensive care setting. Acid suppressive therapy, including proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists, has been associated with adverse effects, including increased risk of nosocomial infections. Reduction in the rate of inappropriate use of SUP may mitigate the risk of medication adverse effects and unnecessary health care costs. Our interdisciplinary team executed a bundled quality improvement initiative to reduce inappropriate use of SUP in the ICU, which included ( a) developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for use of SUP, ( b) implementing these clinical guidelines with an education intervention targeting ICU health care providers, and ( c) determining provider attitudes regarding SUP use before and after implementation of the bundled initiative. Within 1 month following implementation, inappropriate SUP (per patient hospital day) decreased from 19% to 6.6% ( P = .002). Our multidisciplinary bundled quality improvement initiative reduced inappropriate use of SUP. The program was successfully integrated into the pharmacists’ workflow, thus yielding a sustainable impact on SUP use.

Survey on Clinical Practice Guidelines Use among Latin American Cardiologists.

Background There is a broad consensus about the benefits of applying Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) as a standard of care and most countries, even in Latin America; however, the applicability of CPGs to medical practice is lower than expected. The failure in the implementation of CPGs is due to several factors, including physicians’ lack of adherence. Objectives To estimate the utilization rate of CPGs and to know the objections of Latin American cardiologists against them. Material and Methods We conducted an anonymous email survey among 10% of the Spanish-speaking members of the Interamerican Society of Cardiology that were randomly selected. The questions included demographic data, use of CPGs and objections to use them. We assumed that most of the respondents would make a positive answer when asked about the use CPGs; yet, we also assumed that they would criticize and comment the limitations of CPGs if they were induced to do so. Results The survey was responded by 952 of the 1197 cardiologists selected. The utilization rate of CPGs was 91.5%; 75.8% (660/871) used foreign and local guidelines, while 24.2% only used local CPGs. 58.2% of survey respondents had at least one objection to the quality or usefulness of CPGs. The most common complaints were that the guidelines proposed the use of resources that were not always available (11.5%), recommended impractical strategies due to lack of medical coverage (9.2%) and did not represent the patients in real practice (7.7%). Among those who did not use CPGs, 22.2% did not know the last guidelines published. Conclusions Although the utilization of CPGs is high, the objections about their usefulness constitute a barrier to improve the adherence of cardiologists to use them. These data should be considered to improve the production, diffusion and implementation of CPGs in Latin America.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the treatment of anaemia in cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for use

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the treatment of anaemia in cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for use

Assessment of evidence-based psychotherapy practices in usual care: challenges, promising approaches, and future directions.

Assessment of evidence-based psychotherapy practices in usual care: challenges, promising approaches, and future directions.

P-336 Ontario physicians' attitudes toward and use of clinical practiceguidelines in oncology

P-336 Ontario physicians' attitudes toward and use of clinical practiceguidelines in oncology

Membranous lupus nephritis

Membranous lupus nephritis (MLN) represents about 20% of clinically significant renal disease in lupus. Few studies have addressed directly the pathogenesis of MLN. Our assumptions about the underlying mechanisms are based on the combination of extrapolations from idiopathic membranous nephritis (mainly from animal models) and proliferative lupus nephritis. Natural history studies of MLN suggest a relatively low rate of progression to end-stage renal disease but a high rate of significant comorbidities. Historical changes in the criteria for pathologic diagnosis and classification of membranous lupus nephropathy have precluded definitive descriptions of the natural history, prognosis and treatment of this disorder. Patients with membranous lupus nephropathy should be treated early with angiotensin antagonists to minimize proteinuria, as well as lifestyle changes and appropriate drugs to reduce attendant cardiovascular risk factors. In patients with protracted nephrotic syndrome, consideration should be given to immunosuppressive therapies, including corticosteroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate and cyclophosphamide. Prospective controlled trials are clearly needed in order to establish solid clinical practice guidelines for use of these drugs and other experimental therapies currently under study in membranous lupus nephropathy.

Therapy of membranous nephropathy in systemic lupus erythematosus

Historic changes in the criteria for pathologic diagnosis and classification of lupus membranous nephropathy (LMN) have precluded definitive descriptions of the natural history, prognosis, and treatment of this disorder. The interim practice, based on the 1982 World Health Organization classification system, of admixing membranous and proliferative lupus nephropathies under the rubric of LMN has confounded the medical literature. Cases with mixed histology should be treated according to recommendations for proliferative lupus nephritis. Patients with LMN should be treated early with angiotensin antagonists to minimize proteinuria, as well as lifestyle changes and appropriate drugs to reduce attendant cardiovascular risk factors. In patients with protracted nephrotic syndrome, consideration should be given to immunosuppressive therapies including corticosteroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate, and cyclophosphamide. Prospective controlled trials clearly are needed to establish solid clinical practice guidelines for use of these drugs and other experimental therapies currently under study in LMN. This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use.

Methods of Cognitive Analysis to Support the Design and Evaluation of Biomedical Systems: The Case of Clinical Practice Guidelines

This article provides a theoretical and methodological framework for the use of cognitive analysis to support the representation of biomedical knowledge and the design of clinical systems, using clinical-practice guidelines (CPGs) as an example. We propose that propositional and semantic analyses, when used as part of the system-development process, can improve the validity, usability, and comprehension of the resulting biomedical applications. The framework we propose is based on a large body of research on the study of how people mentally represent information and subsequently use it for problem solving. This research encompasses many areas of psychology, but the more important ones are the study of memory and the study of comprehension. Of particular relevance is research devoted to investigating the comprehension and memory of language, expressed verbally or in text. In addition, research on how contextual variables affect performance is informative because these psychological processes are influenced by situational variables (e.g., setting, culture). One important factor limiting the acceptance and use of clinical-practice guidelines (CPGs) may be the mismatch between a guideline's recommended actions and the physician-user's mental models of what seems appropriate in a given case. Furthermore, CPGs can be semantically complex, often composed of elaborate collections of prescribed procedures with logical gaps or contradictions that can promote ambiguity and hence frustration on the part of those who attempt to use them. An improved understanding of the semantics and structure of CPGs may help to improve such matching, and ultimately the comprehensibility and usability of CPGs. Cognitive methods of analysis can help guideline designers and system builders throughout the development process, from the conceptual design of a computer-based system to its implementation phases. By studying how guideline creators and developers represent guidelines, both mentally and in text, and how end-users understand and make decisions with such guidelines, we can inform the development of technologies that seek to improve the match between the representations of experts and practitioners. We urge informaticians to recognize the potential relevance of cognitive analysis methods and to begin more extensive experimentation with the their use in biomedical informatics research.

A review of dolasetron as management of nausea and vomiting in cancer patients

Objective. To systematically review the literature about the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, dosing, and adverse effects of dolasetron, and to define its role in the management of chemotherapy-and radiation-induced nausea and vomiting. Data Synthesis. A MedLine search was conducted using 5-HT3-receptor antagonists, antiemetics, chemotherapy toxicity, dolasetron, emesis, nausea, and vomiting as search terms. Reference lists and bibliographies of pertinent articles were also identified and reviewed. Both preclinical and clinical literature were reviewed and analyzed. Data Synthesis. Dolasetron is a serotonin type 3 (5-HT3)-receptor antagonist with potent antiemetic effects in the management of nausea and vomiting. Following administration, dolasetron is rapidly converted to hydrodolasetron, which is believed to be responsible for the drug's antiemetic activity. Results of multiple studies have demonstrated the efficacy of this agent in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis, including that induced by cisplatin. As a single agent, dolasetron produces a complete response rate (RR) in 44% to 57% of patients treated with cisplatin (≥70 mg/m2) and in 59% to 80% of patients treated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, such as cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) therapy. When combined with dexamethasone, the RRs are increased. Dolasetron is well tolerated, with headache (24%) and diarrhea (12%) the most commonly reported adverse effects. The efficacy and safety of dolasetron are comparable to those observed with other 5-HT3-receptor antagonists. According to four recently published clinical practice guidelines for use of antiemetics, dolasetron is an appropriate first-line option for the prevention of nausea and vomiting due to moderately to highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Further clinical trials will determine the optimal dose and the role of this highly effective antiemetic agent for other purposes, such as treatment of delayed emesis and emesis resulting from radiation therapy and high-dose chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation.