Clinical N1 Non-small Cell Lung Research Articles

Predictors of nodal upstaging in clinical N1 nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is currently the first choice for the treatment of clinical N1 (cN1) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, diagnosing cN1 correctly can be difficult, even with current imaging diagnostic technologies. We aimed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative nodal status and the predictive factors for nodal upstaging of cN1-NSCLC. Patients receiving surgery for cN1-NSCLC in 2010 (n=1040) were enrolled in the Japanese Joint Committee of Lung Cancer Registry Database. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of cN1, predictive factors for nodal upstaging, and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The 5-year OS and RFS for all patients were 58.2% and 42.7%, respectively. The postoperative pathological nodal status included N0 (36.6%), N1 (39.7%), N2 (23.6%), and N3 (0.1%). In multivariate analysis, younger age (P=.005), no history of smoking (P=.006), and adenocarcinoma (P<.001) were significant predictive factors for nodal upstaging. Older age (P<.001) and higher clinical T (cT) factor (P<.001) were significant indicators for worse OS, while older age (P=.02), higher cT factor (P=.019), high carcinoembryonic antigen value (P=.002), and adenocarcinoma (P=.008) were significant indicators for worse RFS. The diagnostic accuracy of cN1 in this study was ~40%. No history of smoking and adenocarcinoma were significant predictors for nodal upstaging. Although younger age was a significant predictor for nodal upstaging, it was a significant factor for better prognosis.

Prognostic significance of uncertain resection for metastasis in the highest mediastinal lymph node after surgery for clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer.

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer defined types of surgical resection and considered the positivity of the highest mediastinal lymph node resected a parameter of "uncertain resection" (R-u). We investigated the metastases in the highest mediastinal lymph node, defined as the lowest numerically numbered station among those resected. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of R-u compared with R0. We selected 550 patients with non-small cell lung cancer at clinical Stage I, IIA, IIB (T3N0M0), or IIIA (T4N0M0) undergoing lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy between 2015 and 2020. The R-u group included patients with positive highest mediastinal resected lymph node. In the groups of patients with mediastinal lymph node metastasis, we defined 31 as R-u (45.6%, 31/68). The incidence of metastases in the highest lymph node was related to the pN2 subgroups (p < 0.001) and the type of lymphadenectomy performed (p < 0.001). The survival analysis compared R0 and R-u: 3-year disease-free survival was 69.0% and 20.0%, respectively, and 3-year overall survival was 78.0% and 40.0%, respectively. The recurrence rate was 29.7% in R0 and 71.0% in R-u (p-value < 0.001), and the mortality rate was 18.9% and 51.6%, respectively (p-value < 0.001). R-u variable showed a tendency to be a significant prognostic factor for disease-free survival and overall survival (hazard ratio: 4.6 and 4.5, respectively, p-value < 0.001). The presence of metastasis in the highest mediastinal lymph node removed seems to be an independent prognostic factor for mortality and recurrence. The finding of these metastases represents the margin of cancer dissemination at the time of surgery, so it could imply metastasis into the N3 node or distant metastasis.

Treatment outcomes of lobectomy with and without mediastinal lymph node dissection in older patients with clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer.

To reduce surgical stress, we omit mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer aged ≥80 years without N1 metastasis, as confirmed via surgery. This study examined the effect of MLND omission on prognosis. Altogether, 212 eligible patients with clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy between 2007 and 2017. Patients were classified into two groups as follows: patients aged 75-79 years who underwent MLND group, and patients aged ≥80 years in whom MLND was omitted (non-MLND group). Propensity score matching was performed between the two groups. There were 86 patients after matching. The non-MLND group showed shorter operative time (237.5 min vs. 207.5 min, p = 0.018). No differences in postoperative complications were noted between the two groups. Between the MLND group and non-MLND group, the 5-year overall survival rates were 84.0% and 84.7% (p = 0.989), relapse-free survival rates were 69.8% and 74.7% (p = 0.855), and cancer-specific survival rates were 91.4% and 91.6% (p = 0.700), respectively. These results did not differ significantly. This study demonstrated that MLND does not affect the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer aged ≥80 years. Lobectomy without MLND is one of the surgical treatment options in older patients with clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Naturally, the clinical stage of patients must be carefully evaluated before surgery.

A Comparison of Surgical Mediastinal Lymph Node Evaluation in Clinical N0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer between Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy and Open Lobectomy

Background: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lobectomy is increasingly a procedure for early-stage lung cancer surgery, but the controversy remains on the adequacy of the lymph node evaluation. Objective: To compare the completeness of surgical mediastinal lymph node evaluation between VATS lobectomy and open lobectomy in clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Material and Methods: Between January 2015 and August 2020, 312 patients who underwent lobectomy for clinical N0 NSCLC at Central Chest Institute of Thailand were reviewed, including 149 patients in VATS lobectomy and 163 patients in open lobectomy. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, and lymphadenectomy results were analyzed and compared. Results: VATS lobectomy had prolonged operative time minute at 198.4±46.8 versus 160.9±73.6 (p≤0.001) but less blood loss at 100 versus 150 (p=0.034) than open lobectomy. The sampling procedure was more frequently performed in the open lobectomy at 44.2% versus 19.5% (p≤0.001), but the VATS lobectomy used the systematic dissection procedure mainly at 67.1% versus 42.9% (p≤0.001). The median overall number of lymph nodes at 19 versus 12 (p≤0.001) and the number of stations N2 nodes at 12 versus 6 (p≤0.001), especially in station 7 were dissected higher in the VATS lobectomy at 130 versus 100 (p≤0.001), but the number of stations N1 nodes was similar. The rate of lymph node upstaging was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.176). The risk factor for lymph node upstaging was only the tumor size. There were no differences in complication and mortality. Conclusion: The completeness of mediastinal lymph node evaluation for patients with clinical N0 NSCLC operated on by an experienced surgeon in VATS lobectomy was comparable with the open lobectomy. Keywords: Video-assisted thoracic surgery; Open thoracotomy; Mediastinal lymph node assessment; Non-small cell lung cancer

Comparison of oncological outcomes between trisegmentectomy and lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer in the left upper division.

The left upper lobe is one of the largest lobes in the lungs and is divided into two anatomical units: the upper division (segments 1+2 and segment 3) and lingula (segments 4 and 5). This anatomical classification is similar to that used for the right upper and middle lobes. Although bilobectomy is not recommended for right upper or middle lobe tumors close to the interlobar plane, lobectomy is often performed for tumors located close to the intersegmental plane in the left upper division. To aid in establishing trisegmentectomy as a standard treatment for clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the left upper lobe, we aimed to re-assess its feasibility based on oncological outcomes according to tumor location. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with clinical N0 NSCLC in the left upper division who underwent left upper lobectomy or trisegmentectomy between April 2006 and December 2020. After propensity score matching, oncological outcomes were compared between the trisegmentectomy and lobectomy groups. To verify whether trisegmentectomy was indicated regardless of tumor distance from the intersegmental plane, we compared the recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates following trisegmentectomy between patients with tumors ≤20 and >20 mm from the intersegmental plane. After propensity score matching, 46 patients were included in each group. There was no significant difference in the 5-year RFS rate between the lobectomy and trisegmentectomy groups (75.5% vs. 84.0%, P=0.41). In the trisegmentectomy cohort, the 5-year RFS rate did not significantly differ according to tumor distance from the intersegmental plane (≤20 or >20 mm) measured using three-dimensional computed tomography (79.4% vs. 81.2%, P=0.69). Multivariate analysis indicated that tumor distance from the intersegmental plane was not a significant predictor of RFS (hazard ratio: 1.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.52-5.91, P=0.37). Our analysis suggests that oncological outcomes (i.e., RFS rates) following trisegmentectomy for clinical N0 NSCLC in the left upper division are not significantly inferior to those following lobectomy, even if the tumor is located close to the intersegmental plane.

18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics nomogram for predicting occult lymph node metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer.

PurposeTo investigate the ability of a PET/CT-based radiomics nomogram to predict occult lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical stage N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and methodsThis retrospective study included 228 patients with surgically confirmed NSCLC (training set, 159 patients; testing set, 69 patients). ITKsnap3.8.0 was used for image(CT and PET images) segmentation, AK version 3.2.0 was used for radiomics feature extraction, and Python3.7.0 was used for radiomics feature screening. A radiomics model for predicting occult lymph node metastasis was established using a logistic regression algorithm. A nomogram was constructed by combining radiomics scores with selected clinical predictors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to verify the performance of the radiomics model and nomogram in the training and testing sets.ResultsThe radiomics nomogram comprising six selected features achieved good prediction efficiency, including radiomics characteristics and tumor location information (central or peripheral), which demonstrated good calibration and discrimination ability in the training (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.884, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.826-0.941) and testing (AUC = 0.881, 95% CI: 0.8031-0.959) sets. Clinical decision curves demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically useful.ConclusionThe PET/CT-based radiomics nomogram is a noninvasive tool for predicting occult lymph node metastasis in NSCLC.

Prognostic impact of examined mediastinal lymph node count in clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer.

The number of examined mediastinal lymph nodes (mLNs) could represent the quality of mediastinal lymphadenectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the number of examined individual mLNs in patients with resectable NSCLC. We retrospectively evaluated 1420 patients with clinical stage IA-IIB, N0 NSCLC who underwent complete resection by lobectomy, which involved hilar and mLN dissection, between 2008 and 2016. We investigated the threshold number of examined mLNs that had prognostic significance and evaluated their effects on the risk of mLN recurrence. In a respective multivariable analysis according to the number of examined mLNs, examining ≥3 mLNs [reference (ref.) mLNs ≤2] achieved statistical significance and had the best prognosis (hazard ratio, 0.68; P = 0.013). In the multivariable analyses for each pathological N (pN) stage, ≥3 examined mLNs (ref. mLNs ≤2) were an independent prognostic factor in pN1 disease (hazard ratio, 0.32, P = 0.002), but not in pN0 or pN2 disease. The cumulative incidence of mLN recurrence was significantly lower in patients with ≥3 examined mLNs (ref. mLNs ≤2, hazard ratio, 0.27; P = 0.008) in pN1 disease. Patients with ≥3 examined mLNs had higher upstaging rates to pN2 than those with ≤2 examined mLNs. Examining ≥3 mLNs contributed to a favourable prognosis and low mLN recurrence risk in patients with clinical stage I-II, N0 NSCLC. Our findings can serve as a benchmark for the number of required mLNs to be examined.

Artificial intelligence analysis of three-dimensional imaging data derives factors associated with postoperative recurrence in patients with radiologically solid-predominant small-sized lung cancers.

Indications of limited resection, such as segmentectomy, have recently been reported for patients with solid-predominant lung cancers ≤2 cm. This study aims to identify unfavourable prognostic factors using three-dimensional imaging analysis with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. A total of 157 patients who had clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer with a radiological size ≤2 cm, and a consolidation tumour ratio > 0.5, who underwent anatomical lung resection between 2011 and 2017 were enrolled. To evaluate the three-dimensional structure, the ground-glass nodule/Solid Automatic Identification AI software Beta Version (AI software; Fujifilm Corporation, Japan) was used. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and solid-part volume measured by AI software (AI-SV) showed significant differences between the 139 patients with adenocarcinoma and the 18 patients with non-adenocarcinoma. Among the adenocarcinoma patients, 42 patients (30.2%) were found to be pathological upstaging. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that high SUVmax, high carcinoembryonic antigen level and high AI-SV were significant prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS; P < 0.05). The 5-year RFS was compared between patients with tumours showing high SUVmax and those showing low SUVmax (67.7% vs 95.4%, respectively, P < 0.001). The 5-year RFS was 91.0% in patients with small AI-SV and 68.1% in those with high AI-SV (P = 0.001). High AI-SV, high SUVmax and abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen level were unfavourable prognostic factors of patients with solid-predominant lung adenocarcinoma with a radiological size ≤2 cm. Our results suggest that lobectomy should be preferred to segmentectomy for patients with these prognostic factors.

Oncological clearance of minimally invasive approaches for clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer

Oncological clearance of minimally invasive approaches for clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer

Oncological clearance of minimally invasive lobectomy for clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer: the role of robotic surgery

Oncological clearance of minimally invasive lobectomy for clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer: the role of robotic surgery

Long-term outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity score-weighted comparison with open thoracotomy

ObjectivesAlthough the video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach has been accepted as a safe and effective alternative to lobectomy, its advantage remains unclear in advanced-stage lung cancer. This study is aimed to evaluate the feasibility and long-term outcomes of VATS in lung cancer with clinical N1 (cN1) disease. Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 1149 consecutive patients who underwent lobectomy for cN1 disease from 2006 to 2016. Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates were compared using a propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) technique. ResultsWe performed VATS and open thoracotomy for 500 and 649 patients, respectively. All preoperative characteristics became similar between the two groups after IPTW adjustment. Compared to thoracotomy, VATS was associated with shorter hospitalization (7.7 days vs. 9.2 days, p < 0.001), earlier adjuvant chemotherapy (41.7 days vs. 46.6 days, p = 0.028), similar complete resection rates (95.2 % vs. 94.0 %, p = 0.583), and equivalent dissected lymph nodes (27.5 vs. 27.8, p = 0.704). On IPTW-adjusted analysis, overall survival (OS) (59.4 % vs. 60.3 %, p = 0.588) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (59.2 % vs. 56.9 %, p = 0.651) at 5 years were also similar between the two groups. Multivariable Cox analysis revealed that VATS was not a significant prognostic factor for cN1 disease (p = 0.764 for OS and p = 0.879 for RFS). ConclusionsVATS lobectomy is feasible for patients with cN1 disease, providing comparable perioperative outcomes, oncologic efficacy, and long-term outcomes as open thoracotomy.

Clinical features and prognosis of clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer exceeding 30mm.

This study aimed to determine the characteristics, ground glass opacity ratio and prognosis of patients with clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer tumours exceeding 30mm in size. Patients with clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer and total tumour size >30mm on preoperative computed tomography who underwent complete resection with lobectomy between January 2007 and December 2017 were included. The patients were divided into three groups: pure solid tumour, low ground glass opacity ratio (1-39%) tumour and high ground glass opacity ratio (≥40%) tumour. The cut-off line was determined based on the recurrence rate for every 10% ground glass opacity ratio. Among the 227 study patients, 129 (56.8%) had a pure solid tumour, 54 (23.8%) had a low ground glass opacity ratio tumour and 44 (19.4%) had a high ground glass opacity ratio tumour. Three-year recurrence-free survival was significantly shorter in patients with a pure solid tumour (57.4%) than in patients with a low ground glass opacity ratio (74.5%; P=0.009) or a high ground glass opacity ratio tumour (92.1%; P<0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that ground glass opacity ratio was a significant independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.175; P=0.037). Pure solid tumours comprised a large proportion of non-small cell lung cancer tumours >30mm in size and their prognosis was poor. The presence of ground glass opacity and their relative proportion affect prognosis in patients with clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer tumours >30mm in size, similar to those with small-sized tumours.

Preoperative identification of clinicopathological prognostic factors for relapse-free survival in clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective single center-based study

BackgroundGiven the difficulty in preoperatively diagnosing lymph node metastasis, patients with Stage I–III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are likely to be included in the clinical N1 (cN1) group. However, better treatment options might be selected through further stratification. This study aimed to identify preoperative clinicopathological prognostic and stratification factors for patients with cN1 NSCLC.MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated 60 patients who were diagnosed with NSCLC during 2004–2014. Clinical nodal status had been evaluated using routine chest computed tomography (CT) and/or positron emission tomography (PET). To avoid biasing the fluorodeoxyglucose uptake values based on inter-institution or inter-model differences, we used only two PET systems (one PET system and one PET/CT system). Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary study outcomes. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was calculated for each tumor and categorized as low or high based on the median value. Patient sex, age, histology, tumor size, and tumor markers were also assessed.ResultsPoor OS was associated with older age (P = 0.0159) and high SUVmax values (P = 0.0142). Poor RFS was associated with positive carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) expression (P = 0.0035) and high SUVmax values (P = 0.015). Multivariate analyses confirmed that poor OS was independently predicted by older age (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.751, confidence interval [CI]: 1.300–5.822; P = 0.0081) and high SUVmax values (HR = 5.121, 95% CI: 1.759–14.910; P = 0.0027). Furthermore, poor RFS was independently predicted by positive CEA expression (HR = 2.376, 95% CI: 1.056–5.348; P = 0.0366) and high SUVmax values (HR = 2.789, 95% CI: 1.042–7.458; P = 0.0410). The primary tumor’s SUVmax value was also an independent prognostic factor for both OS and RFS.ConclusionsFor patients with cN1 NSCLC, preoperative prognosis and stratification might be performed based on CEA expression, age, and the primary tumor’s SUVmax value. To enhance the prognostic value of the primary tumor’s SUVmax value, minimizing bias between facilities and models could lead to a more accurate prognostication.

Intentional Segmentectomy for Clinical T1 N0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Survival Differs by Segment

Outcomes after segmentectomy compare favorably with those after lobectomy in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether long-term outcomes vary by segmentectomy location is unclear. We investigated whether disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) differ by segmentectomy location after intentional segmentectomy for clinical T1 N0 M0 NSCLC. Patients who received intentional segmentectomy for cT1 N0 M0 NSCLC from 2000 to 2018 were reviewed. Patients with prior lung cancer, forced expiratory volume in 1 second of less than 50%, or R1/R2 resection were excluded. Segmentectomy groups were left (L) basilar, L segment 6, L lingula, L trisegment; right (R): basilar (R_Bas), segment 6 (R_S6), and R upper. The 5- and 10-year DFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Factors associated with DFS and OS were determined using Cox proportional hazards models. In total, 416 patients met the inclusion criteria. Segmentectomy groups differed with regard to surgical approach, mediastinal lymphadenectomy, lymphovascular invasion, tumor histology, margin distance, and adjuvant therapy. Long-term outcomes were worst after R_S6 resection (5-year DFS, 57.6% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 45.7%-72.7%]; OS, 66.3% [95% CI, 54.7%-80.3%]) and best after R_Bas resection (5-year DFS, 77.1% [95% CI, 59.2%-100%]; OS, 79.5% [95% CI, 60.9%-100%]). On multivariable analysis, R_S6 resection was independently associated with DFS vs R_Bas (hazard ratio, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.18-7.08; P= .02) and OS vs R_Bas (hazard ratio, 4.35; 95% CI, 1.61-11.76; P= .004). Resection of R_S6 is independently associated with worse DFS and OS in patients receiving intentional segmentectomy for cT1 N0 M0 NSCLC and may warrant more extensive resection, complete lymph node dissection, and closer postoperative surveillance.

Impact of the number of resected lymph nodes during multi-portal VATS lobectomy for clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer

Background: The adequacy of lymphadenectomy based on the number of resected lymph nodes in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been questioned. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the role of lymph node dissection during VATS lobectomy for NSCLC, and reveal the relationship between the number of lymph node retrieved and overall and recurrence-free survival.

Invasive mediastinal staging by endosonography or video-assisted mediastinoscopy in PET-CT clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer.

Patients with clinical N1 (cN1) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on PET-CT imaging are often found to have occult mediastinal nodal involvement (N2-disease) at invasive staging or resection although the PET-CT was negative on the mediastinum. Two multicenter prospective studies in patients with PET-negative mediastinum but suspected cN1-disease were performed to measure sensitivity of two invasive mediastinal staging strategies to detect mediastinal nodal disease, one with endosonography and one with video-assisted mediastinoscopy (VAM) or video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA). Consecutive patients with operable and resectable cN1 (suspected) NSCLC underwent endosonography, if negative followed by mediastinoscopy in the first study (n=100). In the second study with identical inclusion criteria, patients (n=105) underwent a VAM or VAMLA [VAM(LA)]. All patients underwent FDG-PET and CT scan prior to invasive mediastinal staging. The primary study outcome was sensitivity to detect N2-disease. Secondary endpoints were the prevalence of N2-disease, negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of the invasive staging procedure. In both studies, 25% of patients with cN1 disease on imaging had eventually pathology-proven N2-disease. Endosonography alone reached a sensitivity (38%) to detect mediastinal nodal disease. Invasive mediastinal staging with VAM(LA) had a sensitivity of 73% to detect N2-disease. The NPV was 92% and accuracy 93%. At endosonography, a mean of 2.1 mediastinal nodal stations were biopsied vs. 3.9 at VAM(LA). VAM(LA) has a satisfactory sensitivity of 73% to detect mediastinal nodal disease in cN1 lung cancer and could be the technique of choice for pre-resection mediastinal lymph node assessment in this patient group with a one in four chance of occult positive mediastinal nodes after negative PET-CT.

P2.18-17 Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Clinical N1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

P2.18-17 Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Clinical N1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Prognostic factor and treatment strategy for clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical results of clinical N1 disease and to clarify the high-risk clinical N1 subgroup. Between 1990 and 2012, 137 patients who were clinically diagnosed as having N1 disease were enrolled. Their medical records were reviewed to assess clinical characteristics, radiologic findings, pathologic results, postoperative outcomes, recurrence patterns, and survival. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictive factors for pathologic N2 upstaging. To determine which factors were significantly associated with survival, a multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model was performed. More cases were pathological N2 in adenocarcinoma than squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.039). The overall survival rates at 5years were 54.9%, 36.7% in group upper lobe, middle and lower lobe, respectively (p = 0.013). Logistic regression analyses revealed that #10 positive (p = 0.002, HR 4.625) and adenocarcinoma (p = 0.029, HR 1.544) were significant predictor of pathologic N2 disease. Multivariate analyses revealed that pathologic N2 (p = 0.007, HR 4.186), middle and lower lobe (p = 0.009, HR 2.045) and presence of #10 (p = 0.024, HR 1.871) were independent prognostic factors. Patients with upper lobe and absence of #10 showed a significantly higher 5-year survival rate than patients with middle and lower lobe and presence of #10 (62.1 vs 25.9%: p < 0.0001). Among patients with cN1, pathological N2 disease, tumor in middle and lower lobe and clinical #10 lymph node positive were high-risk subgroup. Further analyses using larger numbers of patients with N1 disease from multiple centers are necessary.

Prognosis of upstaged N1 and N2 disease after curative resection in patients with clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer.

Nodal upstaging occasionally occurs after curative resection in clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognosis of clinical N0 NSCLC (T1-2, tumor size 5 cm or smaller) after upstaging to pathologic N1 or N2. From 2005 to 2015, 676 consecutive patients were diagnosed with clinical T1-2N0 NSCLC and underwent curative resection. Among these, tumors were upstaged to N1 in 46 patients and to N2 in 24 patients. We analyzed the prognosis of upstaged tumors. For comparison of prognosis between nodal upstaging groups and others in the same stage, patients with preoperative pathologically proven N1 (n=31) and N2 (n=55) NSCLC were included in the study. A total of 70 patients (10.4%) had nodal upstaging after curative resection of clinical N0 NSCLC. Upstaging to N1 occurred in 46 patients and upstaging to N2 occurred in 24 patients. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was not statistically different between the upstaged and non-upstaged N1/N2 groups in N1 disease (73.3% vs. 70.5%, P=0.247) or in N2 disease (58.9% vs. 50.7%, P=0.283). Multivariate analysis showed that nodal upstaging was not a significant prognostic factor in N1 or N2 NSCLC (hazard ratio =0.385, P=0.235; hazard ratio =0.677, P=0.458). Postoperative nodal upstaging from clinical T1-2N0 NSCLC was not a significant prognostic factor in the same stage. Therefore, surgical treatment of clinical T1-2N0 lung cancer diagnosed by imaging without preoperative pathologic lymph node staging can be a treatment option.

Mediastinal staging by videomediastinoscopy in clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer.

VAM(LA) has adequate sensitivity to be considered as the approach of choice for preoperative mediastinal staging in the subgroup of early-stage operable NSCLC patients http://ow.ly/42Wn30m78Zw