Clinical Enterobacterales Isolates Research Articles

Rapid detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC-producers by eazyplex® SuperBug AmpC assay compared to whole-genome sequencing

Current methods for plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase (pAmpC) detection in routine microbiological laboratories are based on various phenotypic tests. Eazyplex®SuperBug AmpC assay is a molecular assay based on isothermal amplification for rapid detection of the most common pAmpC types from bacterial culture: CMY-2 group, DHA, ACC and MOX. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of this assay. The assay was evaluated on 64 clinical isolates of Enterobacterales without chromosomal inducible AmpC, and with phenotypically confirmed AmpC production. The results were confirmed, and isolates further characterized by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). eazyplex®SuperBug AmpC assay correctly detected the two most common pAmpC types CMY-2 group (16/16) and DHA (19/19). Detection of ACC and MOX could not be evaluated on our set of isolates since there was only one isolate harbouring ACC and none with MOX. pAmpC encoding genes could be detected in only eight of 36 investigated Escherichia coli isolates. The remaining 28 E. coli isolates harboured previously described mutations in the blaEC promoter, leading to the overexpression of chromosomally encoded E. coli specific AmpC β-lactamase. All results were 100% concordant with the results of WGS. eazyplex®SuperBug AmpC assay enabled rapid and reliable detection of pAmpC-encoding genes in Enterobacterales like Klebsiella spp. and Proteus spp. and the distinction between plasmid-mediated and chromosomally encoded AmpC in E. coli.

Antimicrobial Lasso Peptide Cloacaenodin Utilizes a Unique TonB-Dependent Transporter to Access Susceptible Bacteria.

The development of new antimicrobial agents effective against Gram-negative bacteria remains a major challenge in drug discovery. The lasso peptide cloacaenodin has potent antimicrobial activity against multiple strains in the Enterobacter genus, one of the ESKAPE pathogens. Here, we show that cloacaenodin uses a previously uncharacterized TonB-dependent transporter, which we name CloU, to cross the outer membrane (OM) of susceptible bacteria. Inner membrane transport is mediated by the protein SbmA. CloU is distinct from the known OM transporters (FhuA and PupB) utilized by other antimicrobial lasso peptides and thus offers important insight into the spectrum of activity of cloacaenodin. Using knowledge of the transport pathway to predict other cloacaenodin-susceptible strains, we demonstrate the activity of cloacaenodin against clinical isolates of Enterobacter and of a Kluyvera strain. Further, we use molecular dynamics simulations and mutagenesis of CloU to explain the variation in cloacaenodin susceptibility observed across different strains of Enterobacter. This work expands the currently limited understanding of lasso peptide uptake and advances the potential of cloacaenodin as an antibiotic.

Evolution of ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol resistance in ST131-H30R1-Escherichia coli isolates with KPC-3 mutants and application of FTIR biotyping.

Ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol represent two of the few alternatives for infections by KPC-producing Enterobacterales. We reported the emergence of resistance to both ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol in a KPC-producing ST131-Escherichia coli (KPC-ST131-Ec) clinical isolate. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, whole-genome sequencing, and cloning experiments were performed. A KPC-49-Ec isolate resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam (MICCZA > 16/4 mg/L) and susceptible to cefiderocol (MICFDC: 2 mg/L) was recovered in a blood sample from an oncologic patient hospitalized in the medical ICU (June 2019) during ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. After 44 days, a KPC-31-Ec resistant to both ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol (MICCZA > 16/4 mg/L, MICFDC: 8 mg/L) was found in a rectal sample during a second cycle of ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. Both KPC-49 (R163S) and KPC-31 (D179Y) were detected in the epidemic ST131-H30R1-Ec high-risk clone and showed a phenotype resembling that of ESBL producers. FTIR spectroscopy managed to differentiate cefiderocol-susceptible and resistant ST131-Ec isolates, and these from others belonging to different clones. After cloning and transformation experiments, KPC-49 and KPC-31 were responsible for ceftazidime-avibactam resistance (MICCZA > 16/4 mg/L) and decreased carbapenem MICs (MICMER ≤ 0.12 mg/L, MICIMI ≤ 1 mg/L). KPC-31 was also shown to be associated with increased MICs of cefiderocol (twofold and threefold dilutions over KPC-3 and KPC-49, respectively). However, mutations in proteins participating in outer membrane stability and integrity, such as TolR, could have a more relevant role in cefiderocol resistance. The effects of ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol co-resistance in clinical isolates of Enterobacterales producing KPC mutants make their identification challenging for clinical laboratories.IMPORTANCEThroughout four admissions in our hospital of a single patient, different KPC-3 variants (KPC-3, KPC-49, and KPC-31) were found in surveillance and clinical ST131-Escherichia coli isolates, after prolonged therapies with meropenem and ceftazidime-avibactam. Different patterns of resistance to cefiderocol and ceftazidime-avibactam emerged, accompanied by restored carbapenem susceptibility. The inability to detect these variants with some phenotypic methods, especially KPC-31 by immunochromatography, and the expression of a phenotype similar to that of ESBL producers, posed challenge to identify these variants in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Molecular methods and whole-genome sequencing are necessary and new techniques able to cluster or differentiate related isolates could also be helpful; this is the case of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, which managed in our study to discriminate isolates by cefiderocol susceptibility within ST131, and those from the non-ST131 ones.

Meropenem-ANT3310, a unique β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination with expanded antibacterial spectrum against Gram-negative pathogens including carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

ANT3310 is a novel broad-spectrum diazabicyclooctane serine β-lactamase inhibitor being developed in combination with meropenem (MEM) for the treatment of serious infections in hospitalized patients where carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens are expected. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro antibacterial activity of MEM in the presence of ANT3310 at 8 µg/mL against global clinical isolates that included Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 905), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), carrying either oxacillinase (OXA) (n = 252) or Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) (n = 180) carbapenemases, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 502). MEM was poorly active against A. baumannii, as were MEM-vaborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, and imipenem-relebactam (MIC90 values of ≥32 µg/mL). On the other hand, MEM-ANT3310 displayed an MIC90 value of 4 µg/mL, similar to that observed with sulbactam-durlobactam, a drug developed to specifically treat A. baumannii infections. ANT3310 (8 µg/mL) additionally restored the activity of MEM against OXA- and KPC-producing CREs decreasing MEM MIC90 values from >32 µg/mL to 0.25 and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively. The combination of 8 µg/mL of both MEM and ANT3310 prevented growth of 97.5% of A. baumannii and 100% of OXA- and KPC-positive CREs, with ~90% of P. aeruginosa isolates also displaying MEM MICs ≤8 µg/mL. Furthermore, MEM-ANT3310 was efficacious in both thigh and lung murine infection models with OXA-23 A. baumannii. This study demonstrates the potent in vitro activity of the MEM-ANT3310 combination against both carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii and Enterobacterales clinical isolates, a key differentiator to other β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations.

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Five Newly Approved Antibiotics against Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteria-A Pilot Study in Bulgaria.

To solve the problem with pan-drug resistant and extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative microbes, newly approved drugs such as ceftazidime/avibactam, cefiderocol, plazomicin, meropenem/vaborbactam, and eravacycline have been introduced in practice. The aim of the present study was to collect carbapenemase-producing clinical Enterobacterales isolates, to characterize their carbapenemase genes and clonal relatedness, and to detect their susceptibility to commonly used antimicrobials and the above-mentioned newly approved antibiotics. Sixty-four carbapenemase producers were collected in a period of one year from four Bulgarian hospitals, mainly including Klebsiella pneumoniae (89% of the isolates) and also single Proteus mirabilis, Providencia stuartii and Citrobacter freundii isolates. The main genotype was blaNDM-1 (in 61%), followed by blaKPC-2 (23%), blaVIM-1 (7.8%) and blaOXA-48 (7.8%). Many isolates showed the presence of ESBL (blaCTX-M-15/-3 in 76.6%) and AmpC (blaCMY-4 in 37.5% or blaCMY-99 in 7.8% of isolates). The most common MLST type was K. pneumoniae ST11 (57.8%), followed by ST340 (12.5%), ST258 (6.3%) and ST101 (6.3%). The isolates were highly resistant to standard-group antibiotics, except they were susceptible to tigecycline (83.1%), colistin (79.7%), fosfomycin (32.8%), and aminoglycosides (20.3-35.9%). Among the newly approved compounds, plazomicin (90.6%) and eravacycline (76.3%) showed the best activity. Susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam was 34.4% and 27.6%, respectively. For cefiderocol, a large discrepancy was observed between the percentages of susceptible isolates according to EUCAST susceptibility breakpoints (37.5%) and those of CLSI (71.8%), detected by the disk diffusion method. This study is the first report to show patterns of susceptibility to five newly approved antibiotics among molecularly characterized isolates in Bulgaria. The data may contribute to both the improvement of treatment of individual patients and the choice of infection control strategy and antibiotic policy.

In vitro activity of aztreonam-avibactam and comparators against Metallo-β-Lactamase-producing Enterobacterales from ATLAS Global Surveillance Program, 2016–2020

ObjectivesMetallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales are a major challenge worldwide due to limited treatment options. Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI), which is under clinical development, has shown activity against MBL-positive isolates. This study evaluated the prevalence of MBL producers and the nature of enzymes among a global collection of clinical isolates of Enterobacterales from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program (ATLAS) surveillance program (2016–2020), and the antimicrobial activity of ATM-AVI and comparators against this collection. MethodsNon-duplicate clinical isolates of Enterobacterales (N = 106 686) collected across 63 countries were analysed. Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed using broth microdilution. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. Provisional pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoint of ≤8 mg/L was considered for ATM-AVI. β-lactamase genes were characterized by polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. The Cochran Armitage Trend test was used to determine significant trends in percentage of isolates over time. ResultsOverall, MBL-positive isolates were 1.6% of total Enterobacterales isolates globally, with a significant increasing trend observed over time, globally and across regions (P < 0.05). New Delhi MBL (NDM) was the most common MBL (83.3%). ATM-AVI demonstrated potent activity against MBL-positive isolates (MIC ≤8 mg/L: 99.4% isolates inhibited; MIC90, 1 mg/L). Consistent activity was also noted across different regions. Potent activity was demonstrated against different NDM variants and MBL-positive isolates co-carrying other carbapenemases (98.1% and 99.7% isolates inhibited at ≤8 mg/L, respectively). About 0.6% MBL-positive isolates (10/1707) had MICs >8 mg/L for ATM-AVI. ConclusionATM-AVI demonstrated potent activity against MBL-positive isolates, including NDM variants and MBL-positive isolates co-carrying other carbapenemases, and may represent a good option for treating infections caused by MBL-positive Enterobacterales.

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility/resistance to cefiderocol: which are the best present and future therapeutic alternatives?

PurposeTo evaluate the different present and future therapeutic β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) alternatives, namely aztreonam-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and sulbactam-durlobactam against clinical isolates showing reduced susceptibility or resistance to cefiderocol in Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.MethodsMIC values of aztreonam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, imipenem, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem, meropenem-vaborbactam, meropenem-nacubactam, sulbactam-durlobactam, and cefiderocol combined with a BLI were determined for 67, 9, and 11 clinical Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii isolates, respectively, showing MIC values of cefiderocol being ≥1 mg/L. If unavailable, the respective β-lactam breakpoints according to EUCAST were used for BL/BLI combinations.ResultsFor Enterobacterales, the susceptibility rates for aztreonam, cefepime, imipenem, and meropenem were 7.5%, 0%, 10.4%, and 10.4%, respectively, while they were much higher for cefepime-zidebactam (91%), cefiderocol-zidebactam (91%), meropenem-nacubactam (71.6%), cefiderocol-nacubactam (74.6%), and cefiderocol-taniborbactam (76.1%), as expected. For P. aeruginosa isolates, the higher susceptibility rates were observed for imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol-zidebactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam (56% for all combinations). For A. baumannii isolates, lower susceptibility rates were observed with commercially or under development BL/BLI combos; however, a high susceptibility rate (70%) was found for sulbactam-durlobactam and when cefiderocol was associated to some BLIs.ConclusionsZidebactam- and nacubactam-containing combinations showed a significant in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility to cefiderocol. On the other hand, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam showed the highest susceptibility rates against P. aeruginosa isolates. Finally, sulbactam-durlobactam and cefiderocol combined with a BLI were the only effective options against A. baumannii tested isolates.

1945. Antibacterial activity of cefepime/enmetazobactam and comparator agents against U.S. Enterobacterales clinical isolates collected from 2019-2021

Abstract Background The investigational β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination of cefepime/enmetazobactam (FPE) met criteria for non-inferiority and superiority compared to piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) in a phase 3 clinical trial of adult patients with complicated urinary tract infections/acute pyelonephritis. FPE has demonstrated potent in vitro antibacterial activity against Gram-negative pathogens expressing extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL), the leading cause of resistance to 3rd-generation cephalosporins (3GC). In this study, the in vitro activity of FPE and comparator agents was assessed against Gram-negative clinical isolates obtained from the U.S. between 2019 and 2021. Methods Broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined for 2,241 Enterobacterales clinical isolates following CLSI guidelines. For determination of phenotypic resistance to 3GC, isolates resistant to both ceftriaxone and ceftazidime but susceptible to the carbapenem meropenem (MEM) were selected. ESBL genotyping was performed using a multiplex PCR method. Cefepime breakpoints of susceptible (S) ≤2 µg/ml and susceptible-dose dependent (SDD) ≤8 µg/ml were used as provisional breakpoints for FPE. Results FPE demonstrated potent in vitro activity against the surveillance isolates obtained from US medical centers, with an MIC90 of 0.12 µg/ml that was comparable to those of MEM (0.06 µg/ml) and ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA; 0.25 µg/ml). When applying cefepime breakpoints, susceptibility to FPE was ≥98.4 µg/ml whereas susceptibility to 3GCs and PTZ was ≤85.8%. Against Enterobacterales with either an ESBL genotype or exhibiting a 3GC-resistant phenotype, FPE retained potent in vitro activity (MIC90 = 0.5 and 1 µg/ml) and provisional susceptibility was ≥95.6%. In contrast, susceptibility to 3GCs and PTZ ranged from 0.0 to 65.9%. Summary of the in vitro activity of cefepime/enmetazobactam and comparator agents against US Enterobacterales clinical isolates collected from 2019-2021 Conclusion These results demonstrate that diminished susceptibility to 3GCs and piperacillin/tazobactam has compromised their reliability as empiric therapies. Cefepime/enmetazobactam demonstrates potent in vitro activity comparable to meropenem against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales and is intended as empiric therapy in settings where ESBL are endemic. Disclosures Adam Belley, PhD, Allecra Therapeutics SAS: Advisor/Consultant Nimmi Kothari, PhD, Allecra: Allecra (study funding)|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria|Roche: Honoraria|Roche: This project has been funded by BARDA (HHSO100201600038C). Federica Monti, PhD, Allecra: Study funded|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria Stephen Hawser, PhD, Allecra: study funding|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria|Roche: Honoraria|Roche: This project has been funded by BARDA (HHSO100201600038C).

Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales clinical isolates from a tertiary care hospital in Egypt

BackgroundCarbapenem resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is on the rise globally, triggering a significant health threat and a substantial concern for infection control management. We aimed to detect and characterize carbapenemases producing Enterobacterales (CPE) clinical isolates over a period of nearly one-year duration in Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, a tertiary care hospital in Egypt through molecular and phenotypic methods using carbapenemase detection combination inhibitor disk set (Enterobacterales) MASTDISCS ID (MDI) (MAST, UK), with the addition of temocillin disk.ResultsCRE represented 6.5% of Enterobacterales. Healthcare-associated infections were frequently high representing 87% of the CRE isolated from hospitalized patients. Most of the CRE isolates were Klebsiella pneumonia (68%) followed by Escherichia coli (22%), Enterobacter cloacae (4%), Serratia marcescens (4%) and Citrobacter freundii (2%). Phenotypic detection revealed metallo-β lactamases in 84% of isolates, followed by oxacillinase-48 {(OXA-48) 6%} and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase in 2% of the isolates. The most prevalent gene detected by conventional PCR was blaNDM (84%) followed by blaOXA-48 (6%) and blaKPC (2%). Excellent agreement was found between PCR and MDI for detection of carbapenemase production.ConclusionsNDM carbapenemase is prevalent in our hospital. Carbapenemase detection combination inhibitor disk set (Enterobacterales) MASTDISCS ID is a useful tool for rapid and precise confirmation of the detection of CPE.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol and other newly approved antimicrobials against multi-drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens recovered in intensive care units in Spain and Portugal.

The antimicrobial resistance is a significant public health threat, particularly for healthcare-associated infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens which are increasingly reported worldwide. The aim of this study was to provide data on the in vitro antimicrobial activity of cefiderocol and that of commercially available comparator antibiotics against a defined collection of recent clinical multi-drug resistant (MDR) microorganisms, including carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacteria collected from different regions in Spain and Portugal. A total of 477 clinical isolates of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were prospectively (n=265) and retrospectively (n=212) included (2016-2019). Susceptibility testing was performed using standard broad microdilution and results were interpreted using CLSI-2021 and EUCAST-2021 criteria. Overall, cefiderocol showed a good activity against Enterobacterales isolates, being 99.5% susceptible by CLSI and 94.5% by EUCAST criteria. It also demonstrated excellent activity against P. aeruginosa and S. maltophilia isolates, all being susceptible to this compound considering CLSI breakpoints. Regarding A. baumannii (n=64), only one isolate was resistant to cefiderocol. Our results are in agreement with other studies performed outside Spain and Portugal highlighting its excellent activity against MDR gram-negative bacteria. Cefiderocol is a therapeutic alternative to those available for the treatment of infections caused by these MDR bacteria.

In vitro potency of xeruborbactam in combination with multiple β-lactam antibiotics in comparison with other β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations against carbapenem-resistant and extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales.

Recently, several β-lactam (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations have entered clinical testing or have been marketed for use, but limited direct comparative studies of their in vitro activity exist. Xeruborbactam (XER, also known as QPX7728), which is undergoing clinical development, is a cyclic boronate BLI with potent inhibitory activity against serine (serine β-lactamase) and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). The objectives of this study were (i) to compare the potency and spectrum of β-lactamase inhibition by various BLIs in biochemical assays using purified β-lactamases and in microbiological assays using the panel of laboratory strains expressing diverse serine and metallo-β-lactamases and (ii) to compare the in vitro potency of XER in combination with multiple β-lactam antibiotics to that of other BL/BLI combinations in head-to-head testing against recent isolates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of XER combinations were tested with XER at fixed 4 or 8 µg/mL, and MIC testing was conducted in a blinded fashion using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reference methods. Xeruborbactam and taniborbactam (TAN) were the only BLIs that inhibited clinically important MBLs. The spectrum of activity of xeruborbactam included several MBLs identified in Enterobacterales, e.g., and various IMP enzymes and NDM-9 that were not inhibited by taniborbactam. Xeruborbactam potency against the majority of purified β-lactamases was the highest in comparison with other BLIs. Meropenem-xeruborbactam (MEM-XER, fixed 8 µg/mL) was the most potent combination against MBL-negative CRE with MIC90 values of 0.125 µg/mL. MEM-XER and cefepime-taniborbactam (FEP-TAN) were the only BL/BLIs with activity against MBL-producing CREs; with MEM-XER (MIC90 of 1 µg/mL) being at least 16-fold more potent than FEP-TAN (MIC90 of 16 µg/mL). MEM-XER MIC values were ≤8 µg/mL for >90% of CRE, including both MBL-negative and MBL-positive isolates, with FEP-TAN MIC of >8 µg/mL. Xeruborbactam also significantly enhanced potency of other β-lactam antibiotics, including cefepime, ceftolozane, ceftriaxone, aztreonam, piperacillin, and ertapenem, against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales that carried various class A, class C, and class D extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, including metallo-β-lactamase-producing isolates. These results strongly support further clinical development of xeruborbactam combinations.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Gram-negative strains in Chile 2015–2021

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) combines ceftazidime and a reversible β-lactamase inhibitor that has shown activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. Using data from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program (ATLAS), this study examined the in vitro antimicrobial activity of CAZ-AVI and other antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria collected from Chilean hospitals between 2015 and 2021. Clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were collected from three medical centres in Chile. Blood, abdominal fluid, urine, soft tissues, and respiratory tract samples were obtained from infected patients. Minimum inhibitory concentrations using the broth microdilution method were determined for susceptibility testing, and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints were used for interpreting the results. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) and carbapenemase genes were also detected through polymerase chain reaction. A total of 2600 Enterobacterales and 836 P. aeruginosa were analysed. CAZ-AVI was the antibiotic with the highest in vitro activity against Enterobacterales (99.72%). The incidence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) was 1.5% (n=39), and the antibiotics with the best in vitro activity were tigecycline (92.31%), CAZ-AVI (88.57%), and amikacin (79.49%). CAZ-AVI was the antibiotic with the best activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (99.34%) and MDR Enterobacterales (99.31%). For KPC-producing Enterobacterales, susceptibility to amikacin was 100%, whereas susceptibility to CAZ-AVI was 91.67%. Regarding MDR and difficult-to-treat resistance P. aeruginosa, 44.83% and 38.99% were susceptible to CAZ-AVI, respectively. CAZ-AVI shows excellent in vitro activity against Enterobacterales in general, CRE, ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, and KPC-producing Enterobacterales. CAZ-AVI is also an option against MDR P. aeruginosa.

Comparing antimicrobial resistant genes and phenotypes across multiple sequencing platforms and assays for Enterobacterales clinical isolates

IntroductionWhole genome sequencing (WGS) of bacterial isolates can be used to identify antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. Previous studies have shown that genotype-based AMR has variable accuracy for predicting carbapenem resistance in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE); however, the majority of these studies used short-read platforms (e.g. Illumina) to generate sequence data. In this study, our objective was to determine whether Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long-read WGS would improve detection of carbapenem AMR genes with respect to short-read only WGS for nine clinical CRE samples. We measured the minimum inhibitory breakpoint (MIC) using two phenotype assays (MicroScan and ETEST) for six antibiotics, including two carbapenems (meropenem and ertapenem) and four non-carbapenems (gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, cefepime, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole). We generated short-read data using the Illumina NextSeq and long-read data using the ONT MinION. Four assembly methods were compared: ONT-only assembly; ONT-only assembly plus short-read polish; ONT + short-read hybrid assembly plus short-read polish; short-read only assembly.ResultsConsistent with previous studies, our results suggest that the hybrid assembly produced the highest quality results as measured by gene completeness and contig circularization. However, ONT-only methods had minimal impact on the detection of AMR genes and plasmids compared to short-read methods, although, notably, differences in gene copy number differed between methods. All four assembly methods showed identical presence/absence of the blaKPC-2 carbapenemase gene for all samples. The two phenotype assays showed 100% concordant results for the non-carbapenems, but only 65% concordance for the two carbapenems. The presence/absence of AMR genes was 100% concordant with AMR phenotypes for all four non-carbapenem drugs, although only 22%—50% sensitivity for the carbapenems.ConclusionsOverall, these findings suggest that the lack of complete correspondence between CRE AMR genotype and phenotype for carbapenems, while concerning, is independent of sequencing platform/assembly method.

In vitro activity of aztreonam–avibactam against Enterobacterales isolates collected in Latin America, Africa/Middle East, Asia, and Eurasia for the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program in 2019–2021

This study aimed to report reference method antimicrobial susceptibility results for 24,937 recent (2019–2021) clinical isolates of Enterobacterales from 27 countries in Latin America, Eurasia, Africa/Middle East, and Asia with a focus on the investigational combination aztreonam–avibactam against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by the CLSI broth microdilution methodology. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were interpreted using the CLSI (2022) breakpoints for all agents except aztreonam–avibactam (provisional pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic susceptible breakpoint, ≤ 8 mg/L) and tigecycline (US-FDA). Molecular testing for β-lactamase genes was performed on isolates with meropenem MICs ≥ 2 mg/L, ceftazidime–avibactam MICs ≥ 16 mg/L, and/or aztreonam–avibactam MICs ≥ 16 mg/L, and 50% of isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella variicola, and Proteus mirabilis testing with ceftazidime and/or aztreonam MICs ≥ 2 mg/L. Aztreonam–avibactam inhibited 99.8% of all Enterobacterales at ≤ 8 mg/L (MIC90, 0.25 mg/L) and maintained activity against phenotypically resistant subsets of multidrug-resistant (MDR) (99.5% susceptible), extensively drug-resistant (XDR) (98.7%), and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) (99.1%) isolates. At ≤ 8 mg/L, aztreonam–avibactam inhibited 100%, 99.6%, 99.6%, and 98.8% of KPC-, OXA-48-like-, ESBL-, and MBL-carrying isolates, respectively. MBL-positive isolates were most prevalent in India (20.5%), Guatemala (13.8%), and Jordan (13.2%). No differences in the activity of aztreonam–avibactam were observed across the global regions evaluated. At a concentration of ≤ 8 mg/L, aztreonam–avibactam inhibited almost all Enterobacterales collected from developing countries, including MBL-producing isolates. The widespread dissemination of MBLs among Enterobacterales highlights the unmet need for new agents such as aztreonam–avibactam for the treatment of CRE infections.

Enterobacterales draft genome sequences: 15 historical (1998-2004) and 30 contemporary (2015-2016) clinical isolates from Pakistan.

The continued emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance among pathogenic bacteria are ever-growing threats to health and economy. Here, we report the draft genomes for 45 Enterobacterales clinical isolates, including historical and contemporary drug-resistant organisms, obtained in Pakistan between 1998 and 2016: 5 Serratia, 3 Salmonella, 3 Enterobacter, and 34 Klebsiella.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in central and northern Europe (Belgium, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland)-SMART 2017-21.

To evaluate the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli collected in four central and northern European countries (Belgium, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland) during 2017-21. Participating clinical laboratories each collected up to 250 consecutive Gram-negative isolates per year from patients with bloodstream, intraabdominal, lower respiratory tract or urinary tract infections. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using 2022 EUCAST breakpoints. β-Lactamase genes were identified in select β-lactam-non-susceptible isolate subsets. Ninety-five percent of all Enterobacterales (n = 4158), 95% of ESBL-positive non-carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (non-CRE) phenotype Escherichia coli and 85% of ESBL-positive non-CRE phenotype Klebsiella pneumoniae were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible. By country, 88% (Belgium), 91% (Sweden, Switzerland) and 96% (Norway) of ESBL-positive non-CRE phenotype Enterobacterales were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible. Greater than ninety-nine percent of non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales and all ESBL-positive non-CRE phenotype Enterobacterales were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (96%) and imipenem/relebactam (95%) inhibited most Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 823). Both agents retained activity against ≥75% of cefepime-resistant, ceftazidime-resistant and piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant isolates; 56% and 43% of meropenem-resistant isolates were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible and imipenem/relebactam susceptible, respectively. By country, 94% (Belgium), 95% (Sweden) and 100% (Norway, Switzerland) of P. aeruginosa were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible and 93% (Sweden) to 98% (Norway, Switzerland) were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Carbapenemase gene carriage among Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates was generally low (<1%) or completely absent with one exception: an estimated 2.7% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Belgium carried an MBL. Recent clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa collected in four central and northern European countries were highly susceptible (≥95%) to ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria collected in North America and Europe in five consecutive annual multinational SIDERO-WT surveillance studies (2014-2019).

To evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin against MBL-producing clinical isolates. MBL-producing strains were selected from clinical isolates of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii complex collected in North America and Europe in five consecutive annual multinational SIDERO-WT surveillance studies from 2014 to 2019. MICs of cefiderocol and comparator agents were determined by the broth microdilution method according to the CLSI guideline. A total of 452 MBL-producing strains consisting of 200 Enterobacterales, 227 P. aeruginosa and 25 A. baumannii complex were identified. The highest number of MBL-producing Enterobacterales strains were detected in Greece. MBL-producing strains of both P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii complex were isolated most frequently in Russia. For Enterobacterales, 91.5% or 67.5% of MBL-producing strains had cefiderocol MIC values ≤4 mg/L (CLSI susceptibility breakpoint) or ≤2 mg/L (EUCAST susceptibility breakpoint), respectively. All MIC values of cefiderocol for MBL-producing P. aeruginosa strains were ≤4 mg/L (CLSI susceptibility breakpoint), and 97.4% of them had cefiderocol MIC values ≤2 mg/L (EUCAST susceptibility breakpoint). For A. baumannii complex, 60.0% or 44.0% of MBL-producing strains had cefiderocol MIC values ≤4 mg/L (CLSI susceptibility breakpoint) or ≤2 mg/L (EUCAST pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic susceptibility breakpoint), respectively. Against all types of MBL-producing strains, MIC distribution curves of cefiderocol were located in the lowest numerical values, compared with other β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations tested and ciprofloxacin. Although the types of MBL-producing strains isolated by country varied, cefiderocol showed potent in vitro activity against all types of MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria regardless of the bacterial species.

Performance Evaluation of BD Phoenix and MicroScan WalkAway Plus for Determination of Fosfomycin Susceptibility in Enterobacterales.

Fosfomycin is an old bactericidal drug that has gained increasing interest in the last decade for its potential use in multi-drug resistant gram-negative infections. However, evidence on fosfomycin susceptibility testing reports a poor correlation between commercial methods vs. reference agar dilution (AD) for Enterobacterales (EB). The study aimed at assessing the performance of two automated systems for the determination of fosfomycin susceptibility in EB clinical isolates. Fosfomycin susceptibility testing results of two collections of 100 non-duplicate clinical EB strains obtained using two different platforms (BD Phoenix and MicroScan WalkAway Plus) were compared with those obtained by AD. Categorical agreement (CA), major error (ME) and very major error (VME) rates were calculated. BD Phoenix exhibited a 6.9% rate of false-resistant results and achieved a CA of 69%, whereas MicroScan WalkAway Plus achieved 3.7% of false-resistant results and 72% of CA. Both automated systems showed poor detection of resistant isolates, with 49.1% and 56.2% of false-susceptible results for BD Phoenix and Microscan WalkAway Plus, respectively. Overall, agar dilution remains the most suitable method for routine laboratory antimicrobial susceptibility testing of fosfomycin on Enterobacterales strains, given the poor performance of automated systems. The application of both automated systems, in the clinical laboratories reporting of fosfomycin, should be reviewed in light of the accuracy results falling below the acceptable threshold.

Antimicrobial resistance of clinical Enterobacterales isolates from urine samples, Germany, 2016 to 2021.

IntroductionEmpirical therapy for the treatment of urinary tract infections should be tailored to the current distribution and susceptibility of potential pathogens to ensure optimal treatment.AimWe aimed to provide an up-to-date overview of the epidemiology and susceptibility of Enterobacterales isolated from urine in Germany.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed antimicrobial susceptibility data from 201,152 urine specimens collected between January 2016 and June 2021 from in- and outpatients. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between year of investigation and antibiotic resistance, adjusted for age, sex and species subgroup. Subgroup analyses were performed for midstream urine samples obtained from (i) female outpatients aged 15 to 50 years, (ii) female outpatients older than 50 years and (iii) male outpatients.ResultsResistance rates of less than 20% were observed for nitroxoline (3.9%), fosfomycin (4.6%), nitrofurantoin (11.7%), cefuroxime (13.5%) and ciprofloxacin (14.2%). Resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) (20.1%), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20.5%), trimethoprim (24.2%), pivmecillinam (29.9%) and ampicillin (53.7%) was considerably higher. In the subgroup of outpatient women aged 15-50 years, resistance rates were generally lower. Resistance rates of all antibiotics decreased from 2016 to 2021. Multiple logistic regression revealed the lowest adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) of 0.838 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.819-0.858; p < 0.001) for pivmecillinam and the highest ORadj of 0.989 (95% CI: 0.972-1.007; p = 0.226) for nitrofurantoin.ConclusionsResistance has generally decreased over the past years, independent of sex, age and causative pathogen. Our data provide an important basis for empirical antibiotic recommendations in various settings and patient collectives.

Epidemiology and in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator agents against multidrug-resistant isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in Latin America as part of the ATLAS surveillance program in 2015‒2020.

The incidence of antimicrobial resistance is increasing in many parts of the world. The focus of this report is to examine changes in antimicrobial resistance epidemiology among clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in six Latin American countries as part of the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program from2015to2020, with a focus on the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) isolates. Non-duplicate, clinical isolates of Enterobacterales (n=15,215) and P. aeruginosa (n=4,614) collected by40laboratories in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Venezuela, from2015to2020, underwent centralized Clinical Lab Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution susceptibility testing. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values were interpreted using2022 CLSI breakpoints. An MDR phenotype was defined by resistance to≥ 3 of seven sentinel agents. In total, 23.3%of Enterobacterales and 25.1% of P. aeruginosa isolates were MDR. Annual percent MDR values for Enterobacterales were stable from2015to2018 (21.3%to23.7%year) but markedly increased in2019(31.5%) and 2020(32.4%). Annual percent MDR values for P. aeruginosa were stable from2015to2020 (23.0%to27.6%year). Isolates were divided into two3-year time-periods, 2015‒2017 and 2018‒2020, for additional analyses. For Enterobacterales, 99.3% of all isolates and 97.1% of MDR isolates from2015‒2017 were ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible compared to97.2% and 89.3%of isolates, respectively, from 2018‒2020. For P. aeruginosa, 86.6%of all isolates and 53.9%of MDR isolates from2015‒2017 were ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible compared to85.3% and45.3% of isolates, respectively, from2018‒2020. Among individual countries, Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa collected in Venezuela showed the greatest reductions in ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility over time. MDR Enterobacterales increased in Latin America from22% in2015to32% in2020 while MDR P. aeruginosa remained constant at 25%. Ceftazidime-avibactam remains highly active against all clinical isolates of both Enterobacterales (97.2%susceptible, 2018‒2020) and P. aeruginosa (85.3%), and inhibited more MDR isolates (Enterobacterales, 89.3% susceptible, 2018‒2020; P. aeruginosa, 45.3%) than carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides.