Clinical Enterobacterales Isolates Research Articles

Comparative genomic analysis of enterobacterial clinical isolates reveals differences in resistome and stress signaling pathway

Comparative genomic analysis of enterobacterial clinical isolates reveals differences in resistome and stress signaling pathway

A-292 Validation of Aztreonam-Avibactam MIC Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test for MicroScan Dried Gram-Negative MIC Panels from a Multicenter Assessment of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas species, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Abstract Background Aztreonam-avibactam (AZA) is a novel antibiotic combination for treating Gram-negative bacterial infections, including metallo-β-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant pathogens for which there are limited or no treatment options.1 Given the need for accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing results, a study was conducted with clinical isolates of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas species, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia on an investigational MicroScan Dried Gram-negative MIC (MSDGN) panel with AZA.2 Methods Three clinical sites evaluated MSDGN MIC values to MICs from CLSI reference panels. The study included 602/671 Enterobacterales, 53/59 Pseudomonas species and 69/70 S. maltophilia isolates using Prompt or turbidity inoculation. MSDGN panels were incubated at 35 ± 1°C and read on the WalkAway, autoSCAN-4, and visually at 16-20 hours. Reference panels were prepared according to CLSI methodology, incubated 16-20 hours for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas species, and 20-24 hours for S. maltophilia and read visually. Results Essential agreement was calculated comparing MSDGN panel MIC results against reference panel MIC results for all isolates (Table 1). Conclusions AZA MIC results for Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas species, and S. maltophilia from MSDGN panels correlate well with MICs obtained using reference panels in this study. 1Pending approval by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA); not available for in vitro diagnostic use in the US. Not for Distribution in the US. 2Pending submission and clearance by the US FDA; not yet available for in vitro diagnostic use in the US. For Investigational Use Only. The performance characteristics of this product have not been established. In development, pending achievement of CE compliance; not yet available for in vitro diagnostic use. © 2024 Beckman Coulter. All rights reserved. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. BEC, the stylized logo and the BEC product and service marks mentioned herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of BEC, Inc. in the US and other countries. 2023-12350

Phenotypic and Genotypic Profiles of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Northeastern Thailand.

The global emergence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae presents a significant public health threat and complicates antibiotic treatment for infections. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae in a clinical setting, analyze their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, and characterize both phenotypic and genetic determinants. A total of 507 non-duplicate clinical isolates of Enterobacterales were collected between 2019 and 2020, and third-generation cephalosporin resistance was screened by disk diffusion. Identification of K. pneumoniae was confirmed using biochemical tests and PCR with species-specific primers. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using disk diffusion, and phenotypic ESBL production was confirmed using the combined disk method. Multiplex PCR detected ESBL genes (blaTEM, blaSHV, and blaCTX-M) and identified blaCTX-M groups. The genetic relatedness of ESBL-producing strains was assessed using the ERIC-PCR approach. Fitty-four isolates were confirmed as ESBL producers, all classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR). All ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates exhibited resistance to ampicillin and cefotaxime, with high resistance rates for ciprofloxacin (98.2%), azithromycin (94.4%), piperacillin-tazobactam (88.9%), and trimethoprim (83.3%). Genotypic analysis revealed blaCTX-M was present in 94.4% of isolates, blaSHV in 87%, and blaTEM in 55.5%. The blaCTX-M-1 group was the most prevalent, accounting for 96.1% of isolates. Co-harboring of blaCTX-M, blaSHV, and blaTEM occurred in 42.6% of isolates, with co-carrying of blaCTX-M, and blaSHV was observed in 23/54 isolates. The ERIC-PCR analysis revealed 15 distinct types, indicating high genetic diversity. These findings highlight the urgent need for ongoing monitoring to control the spread of ESBL among K. pneumoniae and emphasize the importance of early detection and appropriate antibiotic selection for effectively treating infection caused by these pathogens.

Polymyxin B adjuvants against polymyxin B- and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

Aim: Polymyxin B (PMB) is one of the few therapeutic options for treating infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). However, the emergence of PMB-resistant CR-GNB strains has prompted the exploration of antibiotic adjuvants as potential therapeutic avenues. Thus, this study evaluates the potential of 3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid derivatives (DNH01, DNH11, DNH13 and DNH20) and isoniazid-N-acylhydrazones (INZ1-7, INZ9 and INZ11) as adjuvants to enhance PMB efficacy against CR-GNB.Materials & methods: MIC, MBC and drug combination assays were conducted using multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Acinetobacter baumannii. In addition, the effects of PMB and PMB+DNH derivatives were assessed through flow cytometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Results: DNH01, DNH11 and DNH20, unlike the INH-acylhydrazones, significantly restored PMB activity (MIC≤2μg/ml) in 80% of the tested isolates. Flow cytometry and SEM assays confirmed that DNH derivatives rescued the activity of PMB, yielding results comparable to those expected for PMB alone but at 256-fold lower concentrations.Conclusion: These findings suggest DNH derivatives hold substantial promise as PMB adjuvants to combat PMB-resistant CR-GNB infections.

Susceptibility of Gram-negative pathogens collected in Israel to ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/relebactam and comparators: SMART 2018-22.

To assess the in vitro antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/relebactam and comparator agents against clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli collected in Israel from 2018 to 2022. Six clinical laboratories each collected up to 250 consecutive Gram-negative isolates per year from patients with bloodstream, intra-abdominal, lower respiratory tract and urinary tract infections. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted with 2024 EUCAST breakpoints. Acquired β-lactamase gene carriage was investigated for most ceftolozane/tazobactam- and imipenem/relebactam-resistant isolates. Among the full collection of Enterobacterales (n = 4420), 95.1% were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, including 95.3% of putative AmpC/ESBL-positive, non-carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) phenotype Escherichia coli and 86.6% of AmpC/ESBL-positive, non-CRE phenotype Klebsiella pneumoniae. Overall, 99.8% of non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (n = 3723) were imipenem/relebactam susceptible including 98% of the MDR isolates. Most Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (n = 1182) were inhibited by ceftolozane/tazobactam (93.9% susceptible) and imipenem/relebactam (94.7%). Imipenem/relebactam retained activity against ≥78% of cefepime-resistant, ceftazidime-resistant, and piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant P. aeruginosa, while ceftolozane/tazobactam inhibited the greatest percentage of meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (67.4%) among comparator β-lactam antimicrobials. Molecular characterization showed the majority of imipenem/relebactam-resistant Enterobacterales harboured a metallo-β-lactamase, while half of the ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant Enterobacterales carried an acquired ESBL or AmpC. Most of the imipenem/relebactam- and ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant P. aeruginosa characterized did not possess acquired β-lactamases. Recent clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa collected in Israel were highly susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam.

Cefepime-Taniborbactam: A Novel Cephalosporin/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination.

Taniborbactam (formerly known as VNRX-5133) is a novel bicyclic boronate β-lactamase inhibitor of serine β-lactamases (SBLs) [Ambler classes A, C, and D] and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) [Ambler class B], including NDM and VIM, but not IMP. Cefepime-taniborbactam is active in vitro against most isolates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA), including both carbapenemase-producing and carbapenemase-non-producing CRE and CRPA, as well as against multidrug-resistant (MDR), ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant, meropenem-vaborbactam-resistant, and ceftolozane-tazobactam-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. The addition of taniborbactam to cefepime resulted in a > 64-fold reduction in MIC90 compared with cefepime alone for a 2018-2021 global collection of > 13,000 clinical isolates of Enterobacterales. In the same study, against > 4600 P. aeruginosa, a fourfold MIC reduction was observed with cefepime-taniborbactam, compared with cefepime alone. Whole genome sequencing studies have shown that resistance towards cefepime-taniborbactam in Enterobacterales arises due to the presence of multiple resistance mechanisms, often in concert, including production of IMP, PBP3 alterations, permeability (porin) defects, and upregulation of efflux pumps. In P. aeruginosa, elevated cefepime-taniborbactam MICs are also associated with the presence of multiple, concurrent mechanisms, most frequently IMP, PBP3 mutations, and upregulation of efflux pumps, as well as AmpC (PDC) overexpression. The pharmacokinetics of taniborbactam are dose proportional, follow a linear model, and do not appear to be affected when combined with cefepime. Taniborbactam's approximate volume of distribution (Vd) at steady state is 20L and the approximate elimination half-life (t½) is 2.3 h, which are similar to cefepime. Furthermore, like cefepime, taniborbactam is primarily cleared renally, and clearance corresponds with renal function. Pharmacodynamic studies (in vitro and in vivo) have reported that cefepime-taniborbactam has bactericidal activity against various β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacilli that are not susceptible to cefepime alone. It has been reported that antimicrobial activity best correlated with taniborbactam exposure (area under the curve). A phase III clinical trial showed that cefepime-taniborbactam (2g/0.5g administered as an intravenous infusion over 2h) was superior to meropenem for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), including acute pyelonephritis, caused by Enterobacterales species and P. aeruginosa while demonstrating similar safety compared with meropenem. The safety and tolerability of taniborbactam and cefepime-taniborbactam has been reported in one pharmacokinetic trial, and in two pharmacokinetic trials and one phase III clinical trial, respectively. Cefepime-taniborbactam appears to be well tolerated in both healthy subjects and patients. Headache and gastrointestinal upset are the most common drug-related adverse effects associated with cefepime-taniborbactam use. Cefepime-taniborbactam will likely have a role in the treatment of infections proven or suspected to be caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria, including Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. In particular, it may be useful in the treatment of infections caused by isolates that harbor an MBL (NDM, VIM) enzyme, although further clinical data are needed. Additional safety and efficacy studies may support indications for cefepime-taniborbactam beyond cUTI.

Occurrence of blaNDM-1, blaNDM-5, blaNDM-7, and blaKPC-2 genes in clinical isolates of enterobacterales with high genetic variability, from colonization and infection in patients with or without COVID-19, from a hospital in Brazil.

This study aimed to investigate the presence of beta-lactams resistance genes and the clonal relationship of clinical isolates of Enterobacterales obtained from patients with and without COVID-19, in a hospital in northeastern Brazil. The study analyzed 45 carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC-PCR), PCR, and amplicon sequencing to detect resistance genes (blaKPC, blaGES, blaNDM, blaVIM, and blaIMP). The main species were Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, and Proteus mirabilis. Detected genes included blaNDM (46.66%), blaKPC (35.55%), and both (17.79%). ERIC-PCR showed multiclonal dissemination and high genetic variability. The main resistance gene was blaNDM, including blaNDM-5 and blaNDM-7. The presence of Enterobacterales carrying blaKPC and blaNDM in this study, particularly K. pneumoniae, in infections and colonizations of patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19, highlights genetic variability and resistance to carbapenems observed in multiple species of this order.

Effect of incremental tazobactam concentrations on the bactericidal activity of piperacillin against ESBL-producing enterobacterales clinical isolates causing bacteraemia.

We evaluated the activity of piperacillin in relation to INCREASING TAZOBACTAM CONCENTRATION against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales collected from patients with bacteraemia. Increasing tazobactam concentration (4, 12 or 24mg/L) exerted a reduction of piperacillin MICs under the clinical breakpoint in a concentration-dependent manner (0%, 60% and 90% of clinical isolates). Also, activity of piperacillin/tazobactam based at higher achievable serum concentrations (123/14mg/L) is needed to reduce the bacterial growth in 92% of ESBL-producers. CHANGES IN THE PIPERACILLIN MIC IN RELATION TO INCREASING TAZOBACTAM SUGGEST THAT REALTIME TDM COULD BE USED FOR DRIVEN ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY WITH PIPERACILLIN/TAZOBACTAM IN BSI DUE TO ESBL STRAINS.

Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA)-Carbapenem Inactivation Method for Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

The rising incidence of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a concern. Since carbapenemase production is the primary resistance mechanism, detecting and identifying the genes responsible for it is crucial to effectively monitor its spread. This study aims to detect positivity for the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-carbapenem inactivation method (eCIM) for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods:A cross-sectional study was carried out at a tertiary care hospital, including 250 clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These isolates exhibited resistance to at least one of the carbapenems as determined by the VITEK AST 2 System (bioMérieux, USA). The isolates were subjected to mCIM testing, and those that tested positive were further tested using eCIM. The results were interpreted in accordance with the guidelines provided by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2023. Out of the total 250 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, 151 (60.4%) were Klebsiella pneumonia, 44 (17.6%) were Escherichia coli, 10 (4.0%) were Enterobacter cloacae, 6 (2.4%) were Providencia spp., 4 (1.6%) were Serratia marcescens, 4 (1.6%) were Proteus mirabilis and 31 (12.4%) were Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Positivity for the mCIM was observed in 96% (240 out of 250) of the isolates. Of the mCIM-positive isolates, 234 (97.5%) also tested positive for eCIM, indicating metallo-β-Lactamase (MLB) production. A statistically significant association was found between both mCIM and eCIM positivity and the degree of resistance to carbapenem (p<0.05). Conclusion: This study shows that the inexpensive method, a combination of mCIM and eCIM assists in differentiating between serine carbapenemase producers and MLB producers, thereby guiding the selection of appropriate therapy and useful in infection control in resource-limited settings.

Evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST System Version 2.5 for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria From Positive Blood Culture Broth and Subcultured Colony Isolates.

Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) facilitates the optimization of antimicrobial therapy, preventing antimicrobial resistance and improving patient outcomes. QMAC-dRAST (QuantaMatrix Inc., Korea) is a rapid AST platform based on microfluidic chip technology that performs AST directly using positive blood culture broth (PBCB). This study evaluated the performance of QMAC-dRAST for Gram-negative bacteria using PBCB and subcultured colony isolates, comparing it with that of VITEK 2 (bioMérieux, France) using broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference method. We included 141 Gram-negative blood culture isolates from patients with BSI and 12 carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates of Enterobacterales spiked into blood culture bottles. QMAC-dRAST performance was evaluated using PBCB and colony isolates, whereas VITEK 2 and BMD were tested only on colony isolates. For PBCB, QMAC-dRAST achieved 92.1% categorical agreement (CA), 95.3% essential agreement (EA), with 1.8% very major errors (VMEs), 3.5% major errors (MEs), and 5.2% minor errors (mEs). With colony isolates, it exhibited 92.5% CA and 95.1% EA, with 2.0% VMEs, 3.2% MEs, and 4.8% mEs. VITEK 2 showed 94.1% CA and 96.0% EA, with 4.3% VMEs, 0.4% MEs, and 4.3% mEs. QMAC-dRAST yielded elevated error rates for specific antimicrobial agents, with high VMEs for carbapenems and aminoglycosides. The median time to result for QMAC-dRAST was 5.9 h for PBCB samples and 6.1 h for subcultured colony isolates. The QMAC-dRAST system demonstrated considerable strengths and comparable performance to the VITEK 2 system; however, challenges were discerned with specific antimicrobial agents, underlining a necessity for improvement.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in Greece and Italy—SMART 2017–2021

PurposeThe current study evaluated the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL), and comparators against recent (2017–2021) clinical isolates of gram-negative bacilli from two countries in southern Europe.MethodsNine clinical laboratories (two in Greece; seven in Italy) each collected up to 250 consecutive gram-negative isolates per year from lower respiratory tract, intraabdominal, urinary tract, and bloodstream infection samples. MICs were determined by the CLSI broth microdilution method and interpreted using 2022 EUCAST breakpoints. β-lactamase genes were identified in select β-lactam-nonsusceptible isolate subsets.ResultsC/T inhibited the growth of 85–87% of Enterobacterales and 94–96% of ESBL-positive non-CRE NME (non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales) isolates from both countries. IMI/REL inhibited 95–98% of NME, 100% of ESBL-positive non-CRE NME, and 98–99% of KPC-positive NME isolates from both countries. Country-specific differences in percent susceptible values for C/T, IMI/REL, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, levofloxacin, and amikacin were more pronounced for Pseudomonas aeruginosa than Enterobacterales. C/T and IMI/REL both inhibited 84% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Greece and 91–92% of isolates from Italy. MBL rates were estimated as 4% of Enterobacterales and 10% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Greece compared to 1% of Enterobacterales and 3% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Italy. KPC rates among Enterobacterales isolates were similar in both countries (7–8%). OXA-48-like enzymes were only identified in Enterobacterales isolates from Italy (1%) while GES carbapenemase genes were only identified in P. aeruginosa isolates from Italy (2%).ConclusionWe conclude that C/T and IMI/REL may provide viable treatment options for many patients from Greece and Italy.

Evaluation of a simple method for testing aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam synergy in New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales.

NDM-producing carbapenem-resistant bacterial infections became a challenge for clinicians. Combination therapy of aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam is a prudent choice for these infections. However, there is still no recommendation of a practically feasible method for testing aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam synergy. We proposed a simple method for testing aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam synergy and compared it with reference broth micro-dilution and other methods. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates were screened for the presence of the NDM gene by the Carba R test. NDM harbouring isolates were tested for aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam synergy by broth microdilution (reference method), E strip-disc diffusion, double disc diffusion, and disc replacement methods. In the newly proposed method, the MHA medium was supplemented with ceftazidime-avibactam (corresponding to an aztreonam concentration of 4μg/ml). The MHA medium was then inoculated with the standard inoculum (0.5 McFarland) of the test organism. An AZT disc (30 μg) was placed on the supplemented MHA medium, and the medium was incubated overnight at 37°C. Aztreonam zone diameter on the supplemented MHA medium (in the presence of ceftazidime-avibactam) was compared with that from a standard disc diffusion plate (without ceftazidime-avibactam), performed in parallel. Interpretation of synergy was based on the restoration of aztreonam zone diameter (in the presence of ceftazidime-avibactam) crossing the CLSI susceptibility breakpoint, i.e., ≥ 21 mm. Of 37 carbapenem-resistant NDM-producing isolates, 35 (94.6%) were resistant to aztreonam and tested synergy positive by the proposed method. Its sensitivity and specificity were 97.14% and 100%, respectively. Cohen's kappa value showed substantial agreement of the reference method with the proposed method (κ = 0.78) but no other methods. The proposed method is simple, easily interpretable, and showed excellent sensitivity, specificity, and agreement with the reference method. Therefore, the new method is feasible and reliable for testing aztreonam synergy with avibactam in NDM-producing Enterobacterales.

Rapid detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC-producers by eazyplex® SuperBug AmpC assay compared to whole-genome sequencing

Current methods for plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase (pAmpC) detection in routine microbiological laboratories are based on various phenotypic tests. Eazyplex®SuperBug AmpC assay is a molecular assay based on isothermal amplification for rapid detection of the most common pAmpC types from bacterial culture: CMY-2 group, DHA, ACC and MOX. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of this assay. The assay was evaluated on 64 clinical isolates of Enterobacterales without chromosomal inducible AmpC, and with phenotypically confirmed AmpC production. The results were confirmed, and isolates further characterized by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). eazyplex®SuperBug AmpC assay correctly detected the two most common pAmpC types CMY-2 group (16/16) and DHA (19/19). Detection of ACC and MOX could not be evaluated on our set of isolates since there was only one isolate harbouring ACC and none with MOX. pAmpC encoding genes could be detected in only eight of 36 investigated Escherichia coli isolates. The remaining 28 E. coli isolates harboured previously described mutations in the blaEC promoter, leading to the overexpression of chromosomally encoded E. coli specific AmpC β-lactamase. All results were 100% concordant with the results of WGS. eazyplex®SuperBug AmpC assay enabled rapid and reliable detection of pAmpC-encoding genes in Enterobacterales like Klebsiella spp. and Proteus spp. and the distinction between plasmid-mediated and chromosomally encoded AmpC in E. coli.

Antimicrobial Lasso Peptide Cloacaenodin Utilizes a Unique TonB-Dependent Transporter to Access Susceptible Bacteria.

The development of new antimicrobial agents effective against Gram-negative bacteria remains a major challenge in drug discovery. The lasso peptide cloacaenodin has potent antimicrobial activity against multiple strains in the Enterobacter genus, one of the ESKAPE pathogens. Here, we show that cloacaenodin uses a previously uncharacterized TonB-dependent transporter, which we name CloU, to cross the outer membrane (OM) of susceptible bacteria. Inner membrane transport is mediated by the protein SbmA. CloU is distinct from the known OM transporters (FhuA and PupB) utilized by other antimicrobial lasso peptides and thus offers important insight into the spectrum of activity of cloacaenodin. Using knowledge of the transport pathway to predict other cloacaenodin-susceptible strains, we demonstrate the activity of cloacaenodin against clinical isolates of Enterobacter and of a Kluyvera strain. Further, we use molecular dynamics simulations and mutagenesis of CloU to explain the variation in cloacaenodin susceptibility observed across different strains of Enterobacter. This work expands the currently limited understanding of lasso peptide uptake and advances the potential of cloacaenodin as an antibiotic.

Evolution of ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol resistance in ST131-H30R1-Escherichia coli isolates with KPC-3 mutants and application of FTIR biotyping.

Ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol represent two of the few alternatives for infections by KPC-producing Enterobacterales. We reported the emergence of resistance to both ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol in a KPC-producing ST131-Escherichia coli (KPC-ST131-Ec) clinical isolate. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, whole-genome sequencing, and cloning experiments were performed. A KPC-49-Ec isolate resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam (MICCZA > 16/4 mg/L) and susceptible to cefiderocol (MICFDC: 2 mg/L) was recovered in a blood sample from an oncologic patient hospitalized in the medical ICU (June 2019) during ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. After 44 days, a KPC-31-Ec resistant to both ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol (MICCZA > 16/4 mg/L, MICFDC: 8 mg/L) was found in a rectal sample during a second cycle of ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. Both KPC-49 (R163S) and KPC-31 (D179Y) were detected in the epidemic ST131-H30R1-Ec high-risk clone and showed a phenotype resembling that of ESBL producers. FTIR spectroscopy managed to differentiate cefiderocol-susceptible and resistant ST131-Ec isolates, and these from others belonging to different clones. After cloning and transformation experiments, KPC-49 and KPC-31 were responsible for ceftazidime-avibactam resistance (MICCZA > 16/4 mg/L) and decreased carbapenem MICs (MICMER ≤ 0.12 mg/L, MICIMI ≤ 1 mg/L). KPC-31 was also shown to be associated with increased MICs of cefiderocol (twofold and threefold dilutions over KPC-3 and KPC-49, respectively). However, mutations in proteins participating in outer membrane stability and integrity, such as TolR, could have a more relevant role in cefiderocol resistance. The effects of ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol co-resistance in clinical isolates of Enterobacterales producing KPC mutants make their identification challenging for clinical laboratories.IMPORTANCEThroughout four admissions in our hospital of a single patient, different KPC-3 variants (KPC-3, KPC-49, and KPC-31) were found in surveillance and clinical ST131-Escherichia coli isolates, after prolonged therapies with meropenem and ceftazidime-avibactam. Different patterns of resistance to cefiderocol and ceftazidime-avibactam emerged, accompanied by restored carbapenem susceptibility. The inability to detect these variants with some phenotypic methods, especially KPC-31 by immunochromatography, and the expression of a phenotype similar to that of ESBL producers, posed challenge to identify these variants in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Molecular methods and whole-genome sequencing are necessary and new techniques able to cluster or differentiate related isolates could also be helpful; this is the case of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, which managed in our study to discriminate isolates by cefiderocol susceptibility within ST131, and those from the non-ST131 ones.

Meropenem-ANT3310, a unique β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination with expanded antibacterial spectrum against Gram-negative pathogens including carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

ANT3310 is a novel broad-spectrum diazabicyclooctane serine β-lactamase inhibitor being developed in combination with meropenem (MEM) for the treatment of serious infections in hospitalized patients where carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens are expected. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro antibacterial activity of MEM in the presence of ANT3310 at 8 µg/mL against global clinical isolates that included Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 905), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), carrying either oxacillinase (OXA) (n = 252) or Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) (n = 180) carbapenemases, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 502). MEM was poorly active against A. baumannii, as were MEM-vaborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, and imipenem-relebactam (MIC90 values of ≥32 µg/mL). On the other hand, MEM-ANT3310 displayed an MIC90 value of 4 µg/mL, similar to that observed with sulbactam-durlobactam, a drug developed to specifically treat A. baumannii infections. ANT3310 (8 µg/mL) additionally restored the activity of MEM against OXA- and KPC-producing CREs decreasing MEM MIC90 values from >32 µg/mL to 0.25 and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively. The combination of 8 µg/mL of both MEM and ANT3310 prevented growth of 97.5% of A. baumannii and 100% of OXA- and KPC-positive CREs, with ~90% of P. aeruginosa isolates also displaying MEM MICs ≤8 µg/mL. Furthermore, MEM-ANT3310 was efficacious in both thigh and lung murine infection models with OXA-23 A. baumannii. This study demonstrates the potent in vitro activity of the MEM-ANT3310 combination against both carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii and Enterobacterales clinical isolates, a key differentiator to other β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations.

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Five Newly Approved Antibiotics against Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteria-A Pilot Study in Bulgaria.

To solve the problem with pan-drug resistant and extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative microbes, newly approved drugs such as ceftazidime/avibactam, cefiderocol, plazomicin, meropenem/vaborbactam, and eravacycline have been introduced in practice. The aim of the present study was to collect carbapenemase-producing clinical Enterobacterales isolates, to characterize their carbapenemase genes and clonal relatedness, and to detect their susceptibility to commonly used antimicrobials and the above-mentioned newly approved antibiotics. Sixty-four carbapenemase producers were collected in a period of one year from four Bulgarian hospitals, mainly including Klebsiella pneumoniae (89% of the isolates) and also single Proteus mirabilis, Providencia stuartii and Citrobacter freundii isolates. The main genotype was blaNDM-1 (in 61%), followed by blaKPC-2 (23%), blaVIM-1 (7.8%) and blaOXA-48 (7.8%). Many isolates showed the presence of ESBL (blaCTX-M-15/-3 in 76.6%) and AmpC (blaCMY-4 in 37.5% or blaCMY-99 in 7.8% of isolates). The most common MLST type was K. pneumoniae ST11 (57.8%), followed by ST340 (12.5%), ST258 (6.3%) and ST101 (6.3%). The isolates were highly resistant to standard-group antibiotics, except they were susceptible to tigecycline (83.1%), colistin (79.7%), fosfomycin (32.8%), and aminoglycosides (20.3-35.9%). Among the newly approved compounds, plazomicin (90.6%) and eravacycline (76.3%) showed the best activity. Susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam was 34.4% and 27.6%, respectively. For cefiderocol, a large discrepancy was observed between the percentages of susceptible isolates according to EUCAST susceptibility breakpoints (37.5%) and those of CLSI (71.8%), detected by the disk diffusion method. This study is the first report to show patterns of susceptibility to five newly approved antibiotics among molecularly characterized isolates in Bulgaria. The data may contribute to both the improvement of treatment of individual patients and the choice of infection control strategy and antibiotic policy.

In vitro activity of aztreonam-avibactam and comparators against Metallo-β-Lactamase-producing Enterobacterales from ATLAS Global Surveillance Program, 2016–2020

ObjectivesMetallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales are a major challenge worldwide due to limited treatment options. Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI), which is under clinical development, has shown activity against MBL-positive isolates. This study evaluated the prevalence of MBL producers and the nature of enzymes among a global collection of clinical isolates of Enterobacterales from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program (ATLAS) surveillance program (2016–2020), and the antimicrobial activity of ATM-AVI and comparators against this collection. MethodsNon-duplicate clinical isolates of Enterobacterales (N = 106 686) collected across 63 countries were analysed. Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed using broth microdilution. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. Provisional pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoint of ≤8 mg/L was considered for ATM-AVI. β-lactamase genes were characterized by polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. The Cochran Armitage Trend test was used to determine significant trends in percentage of isolates over time. ResultsOverall, MBL-positive isolates were 1.6% of total Enterobacterales isolates globally, with a significant increasing trend observed over time, globally and across regions (P < 0.05). New Delhi MBL (NDM) was the most common MBL (83.3%). ATM-AVI demonstrated potent activity against MBL-positive isolates (MIC ≤8 mg/L: 99.4% isolates inhibited; MIC90, 1 mg/L). Consistent activity was also noted across different regions. Potent activity was demonstrated against different NDM variants and MBL-positive isolates co-carrying other carbapenemases (98.1% and 99.7% isolates inhibited at ≤8 mg/L, respectively). About 0.6% MBL-positive isolates (10/1707) had MICs >8 mg/L for ATM-AVI. ConclusionATM-AVI demonstrated potent activity against MBL-positive isolates, including NDM variants and MBL-positive isolates co-carrying other carbapenemases, and may represent a good option for treating infections caused by MBL-positive Enterobacterales.

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility/resistance to cefiderocol: which are the best present and future therapeutic alternatives?

PurposeTo evaluate the different present and future therapeutic β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) alternatives, namely aztreonam-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and sulbactam-durlobactam against clinical isolates showing reduced susceptibility or resistance to cefiderocol in Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.MethodsMIC values of aztreonam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, imipenem, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem, meropenem-vaborbactam, meropenem-nacubactam, sulbactam-durlobactam, and cefiderocol combined with a BLI were determined for 67, 9, and 11 clinical Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii isolates, respectively, showing MIC values of cefiderocol being ≥1 mg/L. If unavailable, the respective β-lactam breakpoints according to EUCAST were used for BL/BLI combinations.ResultsFor Enterobacterales, the susceptibility rates for aztreonam, cefepime, imipenem, and meropenem were 7.5%, 0%, 10.4%, and 10.4%, respectively, while they were much higher for cefepime-zidebactam (91%), cefiderocol-zidebactam (91%), meropenem-nacubactam (71.6%), cefiderocol-nacubactam (74.6%), and cefiderocol-taniborbactam (76.1%), as expected. For P. aeruginosa isolates, the higher susceptibility rates were observed for imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol-zidebactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam (56% for all combinations). For A. baumannii isolates, lower susceptibility rates were observed with commercially or under development BL/BLI combos; however, a high susceptibility rate (70%) was found for sulbactam-durlobactam and when cefiderocol was associated to some BLIs.ConclusionsZidebactam- and nacubactam-containing combinations showed a significant in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility to cefiderocol. On the other hand, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam showed the highest susceptibility rates against P. aeruginosa isolates. Finally, sulbactam-durlobactam and cefiderocol combined with a BLI were the only effective options against A. baumannii tested isolates.

1945. Antibacterial activity of cefepime/enmetazobactam and comparator agents against U.S. Enterobacterales clinical isolates collected from 2019-2021

Abstract Background The investigational β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination of cefepime/enmetazobactam (FPE) met criteria for non-inferiority and superiority compared to piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) in a phase 3 clinical trial of adult patients with complicated urinary tract infections/acute pyelonephritis. FPE has demonstrated potent in vitro antibacterial activity against Gram-negative pathogens expressing extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL), the leading cause of resistance to 3rd-generation cephalosporins (3GC). In this study, the in vitro activity of FPE and comparator agents was assessed against Gram-negative clinical isolates obtained from the U.S. between 2019 and 2021. Methods Broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined for 2,241 Enterobacterales clinical isolates following CLSI guidelines. For determination of phenotypic resistance to 3GC, isolates resistant to both ceftriaxone and ceftazidime but susceptible to the carbapenem meropenem (MEM) were selected. ESBL genotyping was performed using a multiplex PCR method. Cefepime breakpoints of susceptible (S) ≤2 µg/ml and susceptible-dose dependent (SDD) ≤8 µg/ml were used as provisional breakpoints for FPE. Results FPE demonstrated potent in vitro activity against the surveillance isolates obtained from US medical centers, with an MIC90 of 0.12 µg/ml that was comparable to those of MEM (0.06 µg/ml) and ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA; 0.25 µg/ml). When applying cefepime breakpoints, susceptibility to FPE was ≥98.4 µg/ml whereas susceptibility to 3GCs and PTZ was ≤85.8%. Against Enterobacterales with either an ESBL genotype or exhibiting a 3GC-resistant phenotype, FPE retained potent in vitro activity (MIC90 = 0.5 and 1 µg/ml) and provisional susceptibility was ≥95.6%. In contrast, susceptibility to 3GCs and PTZ ranged from 0.0 to 65.9%. Summary of the in vitro activity of cefepime/enmetazobactam and comparator agents against US Enterobacterales clinical isolates collected from 2019-2021 Conclusion These results demonstrate that diminished susceptibility to 3GCs and piperacillin/tazobactam has compromised their reliability as empiric therapies. Cefepime/enmetazobactam demonstrates potent in vitro activity comparable to meropenem against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales and is intended as empiric therapy in settings where ESBL are endemic. Disclosures Adam Belley, PhD, Allecra Therapeutics SAS: Advisor/Consultant Nimmi Kothari, PhD, Allecra: Allecra (study funding)|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria|Roche: Honoraria|Roche: This project has been funded by BARDA (HHSO100201600038C). Federica Monti, PhD, Allecra: Study funded|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria Stephen Hawser, PhD, Allecra: study funding|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria|Roche: Honoraria|Roche: This project has been funded by BARDA (HHSO100201600038C).