Genetics In Clinical Practice Research Articles

Single center experience developing sustainable genetics clinical care: a model to address workforce challenges in medical genetics.

The national workforce shortage in genetics is being evaluated in order to identify a sustainable solution to the increasing demand for genomic services. An innovative solution to the short term needs is to integrate advanced practice providers (APPs) and embed genetic counselors into both outpatient and inpatient specialty care. Incorporating APPs into a genetic service is not unique in itself, but the method of implementation at Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW) was, at the time, unchartered. There are >100 vacancies for board certified medical geneticists across the nation, training programs are not enrolling sufficient trainees to meet demand and more than a third of the current workforce plan to retire within the next 10 years. The integration of advanced practice providers (nurse practitioners, midwives, physician assistants etc.) into both primary and specialty care has been an evolving practice since the mid-1900s and incorporating APPs into a genetic service was not unique in itself but the method of implementation was new at that time. This is a model to successfully develop a clinical practice model around a team-based structure incorporating nurse clinicians, advanced practice providers, genetic counselors, nutritionists, and physicians into an academic clinical genetics practice.

#234 Clinical spectrum and genetic variants of Alport syndrome and thin basement membrane nephropathy—single center experience

Abstract Background and aims Alport syndrome (AS) and thin basement membrane nephropathy (TBMN) are genetically heterogeneous kidney diseases that manifest with kidney involvement, AS also with hearing and visual impairment. Electron microscopic examination shows characteristic ultrastructural changes in the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) in AS and TBMN, but cannot reliably distinguish between the two entities. Therefore, molecular genetic studies and the identification of individual pathogenic variants in the target genes are crucial to confirm the diagnosis. The aim of our study is to determine the significance of the genetic variants associated with the ultrastructural changes of GBM found in the renal biopsy. Method We retrospectively analyzed records of patients from the University Medical Centre Ljubljana in which ultrastructural GBM changes characteristic for AS and TBMN were found in the renal biopsy, including their clinical, laboratory and histological features. Molecular genetic investigations were made using the new generation sequencing method (NGS) to determine germline pathogenic variants in genes directly related to AS and TBMN (COL4A3, COL4A4 and COL4A5) and in genes that are important in syndromes with a related clinical picture (COL4A6, CD151, LMX1B, MYH9, FN1 and MYO1E). The pathogenicity of variants was determined according to the Clinical Molecular Genetic Society best practice guidelines. Results The study included 73 patients with ultrastructurally confirmed thin GBM. Indications for kidney biopsy were chronic nephritis syndrome in 33 patients (45%), acute worsening of renal function in 16 (22%), nephrotic syndrome in 9 (12%), nephrotic proteinuria and chronic kidney disease in 6 (8%), isolated proteinuria in 5 (7%) and suspected vasculitis in 4 patients (6%). At the time of kidney biopsy average age was 50 ± 16 years, average creatinine 112 ± 70 µmol/L and average estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 65 ± 24 ml/min/1.73 m2, 7 patients had eGFR below 30 ml/min/1.73 m2. Average daily proteinuria was 2.4 ± 3.3 gr and 88% of patients had hematuria. 38% of them have hearing impairment and 43% had positive familiar history of kidney disease. We recorded 33 patients (45%) with genetic variants associated with AS or TBMN: 22 patients (67%) with pathogenic variants, 2 patients (6%) with likely pathogenic and 9 patients (27%) with variants of uncertain significance. The presence of a positive genetic analysis was associated with a higher level of hematuria (p = 0.003), a lower level of proteinuria (p = 0.004) and a positive family history of kidney disease (p < 0.001). It was also associated with hearing loss, but the association was not statistically significant (p = 0.099). Patients with genetic variants had similar eGFR to those with negative genetics (63.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 (58.3-69.4) vs 66.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 (60.0-72.3)), p = 0.698. We also found no differences in GBM thickness in patients without compared to those with identified gene variants (213 nm (160-315) vs. 209 nm (140-410)), p = 0.761. 32 patients (44%) had only focal chronic changes and ultrastructural changes of thin GBM present on kidney biopsy and 41 patients (56%) had also been diagnosed with other renal pathology. When comparing these two groups, patients without associated pathology had lower daily proteinuria (p = 0.048), higher level of hematuria (p = 0.021), frequent hearing impairment (p = 0.008) and also positive genetics analysis (p = 0.016). Conclusion We have shown that in patients with proven ultrastructural alterations in GBM, the presence of so far recognized genetic variants associated with AS and TBMN is 45%, and corresponds to the frequency of other phenotypic characteristics of AS, including hearing impairment and positive family history. In the future, additional clinical tools will be required to accurately determine the role of coexistent thin GBM on the prognosis of patients with other relevant kidney pathology and other genetic tools beyond NGS should be employed to explore other pathologic genetic variants associated with the AS spectrum.

Exploring the evolving roles of clinical geneticists and genetic counselors in the era of genomic medicine.

The increased utilization of clinical genomic sequencing in the past decade has ushered in the era of genomic medicine, requiring genetics providers to acquire new skills and adapt their practices. The change in workplace responsibilities of clinical/medical geneticists (CMGs) and genetic counselors (GCs) in North America, due to the evolution of genetic testing, has not been studied. We surveyed CMGs (n = 80) and GCs (n = 127) with experience in general/pediatric genetics to describe their current practice of clinical tasks and the change in regularity of performing these tasks over the past 5-10 years. Currently, complementarity of responsibilities between CMGs and GCs clearly exists but providers who have been in the field for longer have noted role changes. Trends indicate that fewer experienced CMGs perform physical exams and select genetic tests than before and fewer experienced GCs complete requisitions and write result letters. The frequency of CMGs and GCs who investigate genetic test results, however, has increased. This study provides insight into the changing landscape of clinical genetics practice. Our findings suggest that the roles and responsibilities of CMGs and GCs have shifted in the past decade.

Streamlining Genetic Diagnosis With Long-Range Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-Based Next-Generation Sequencing for Type I and Type II Collagenopathies.

In the practice of clinical genetics, gene testing is usually guided by clinical diagnosis. When dealing with rare diseases, it is often necessary to create new test systems. The handling of a gene with a substantial number of exons poses a challenge both in sequential Sanger sequencing for each exon, and in the setup of capture probes to each exon for next-generation sequencing (NGS). We present very long amplicon sequencing (vLAS), an optimized long-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based NGS method that overcomes this challenge. By utilizing approximately 20 Kb long PCR products and short-read NGS, vLAS is emerging as a highly adaptable and effective solution, especially for genes with numerous exons concentrated in a limited genomic region. Here, we demonstrate vLAS in the analysis of five patients with type I and two with type II collagenopathies. The integration of user-friendly NGS methods into genetic diagnosis enhances the practicality of clinical genetics.

Ancestry, race and ethnicity: the role and relevance of language in clinical genetics practice

BackgroundThe terms ancestry, race and ethnicity are used variably within the medical literature and within society and clinical care. Biological lineage can provide an important context for the interpretation of...

Applicability of clinical genetic testing for deep brain stimulation treatment in monogenic Parkinson's disease and monogenic dystonia: a multidisciplinary team perspective.

In this perspective article, we highlight the possible applicability of genetic testing in Parkinson's disease and dystonia patients treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS). DBS, a neuromodulatory technique employing electrical stimulation, has historically targeted motor symptoms in advanced PD and dystonia, yet its precise mechanisms remain elusive. Genetic insights have emerged as potential determinants of DBS efficacy. Known PD genes such as GBA, SNCA, LRRK2, and PRKN are most studied, even though further studies are required to make firm conclusions. Variable outcomes depending on genotype is present in genetic dystonia, as DYT-TOR1A, NBIA/DYTPANK2, DYT-SCGE and X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism have demonstrated promising outcomes following GPi-DBS, while varying outcomes have been documented in DYT-THAP1. We present two clinical vignettes that illustrate the applicability of genetics in clinical practice, with one PD patient with compound GBA mutations and one GNAL dystonia patient. Integrating genetic testing into clinical practice is pivotal, particularly with advancements in next-generation sequencing. However, there is a clear need for further research, especially in rarer monogenic forms. Our perspective is that applying genetics in PD and dystonia is possible today, and despite challenges, it has the potential to refine patient selection and enhance treatment outcomes.

The right not to know: Non-disclosure of primary genetic test results and genetic counselors' response.

As part of clinical genetic counseling practice, patients may request that their primary genetic test results be disclosed to someone else, such as a relative or referring provider, or request that results be disclosed to no one (non-disclosure). In making these requests, patients employ the ethical principle of the "right not to know," which argues that autonomous individuals can choose not to know relevant health information. Although the right not to know has been well-studied in medicine in general, and in the return of genomic secondary findings, we are not aware of other studies that have explored the return of primary genetic test results when patients request non-disclosure or disclosure to another individual. This study aimed to describe common clinical scenarios in which these requests occur, how genetic counselors respond, and what ethical considerations they employ in their decision-making process. We recruited participants from the National Society of Genetic Counselors' (NSGC) "Student Research Surveys and Reminders" listserv and conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 genetic counselors in the United States who described genetic counseling cases where this occurred. Interviews were transcribed and coded inductively, and themes were identified. Case details varied, but in our study data the requests for non-disclosure were most commonly made by patients with poor, often oncologic, prognoses who requested their test results be disclosed to a family member instead of themselves. Genetic counselors considered similar factors in deciding how to respond to these requests: patient autonomy, medical actionability of results for the patient and family, the relationship between the patient and the person to whom results might be disclosed, and legal or practical concerns. Genetic counselors often made decisions on a case-by-case basis, depending on how relevant each of these factors were. This study adds to the growing body of literature regarding patients' "right not to know" and will hopefully provide guidance for genetic counselors who experience this situation in clinical practice.

An Investigation of Barriers and Enablers for Genetics in Speech-Language Pathology Explored Through a Case Study of Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

Advancements in genetic testing and analysis have allowed improved identification of the genetic basis of childhood apraxia of speech, a rare speech presentation. This study aimed to understand speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') consideration of incorporation of genetics in clinical practice using a theory-informed qualitative approach. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 pediatric SLPs using a behavior change theory (Theoretical Domains Framework [TDF]) within a case study describing a child with complex co-occurring features, including childhood apraxia of speech. Interviews focused on three stages of the patient journey (prereferral, referral, and postreferral). Interviews were analyzed to identify barriers and enablers to considering incorporation of genetics in current clinical practice. Barriers and enablers were grouped and mapped onto a contextually relevant TDF-coded analysis framework. Barriers were identified across several TDF domains, through all stages of the patient journey. Lack of confidence, relevance, and level of experience were most common prereferral, and connection to and awareness of genetics services and contextual factors were barriers in the referral stage. Perception of professional role, knowledge, and beliefs about effects on families were barriers postreferral. Associated enablers were also identified, including seeing value in genetic diagnosis, support from other health care professionals, supervision, and relationships with genetics services. Results of this qualitative study highlight barriers and enablers to incorporating genetics into speech-language pathology clinical practice. These findings will assist in the development of theory-informed implementation strategies to support SLPs into the future. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24112800.

The past, present, and future of child growth monitoring: A review and primer for clinical genetics.

Child growth measurements are critical vital signs to track, with every individual child growth curve potentially revealing a story about a child's health and well-being. Simply put, every baby born requires basic building blocks to grow and thrive: proper nutrition, love and care, and medical health. To ensure that every child who is missing one of these vital aspects is identified, growth is traditionally measured at birth and each well-child visit. While the blue and pink growth curves appear omnipresent in pediatric clinics, it is surprising to realize that their use only became standard of care in 1977 when the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) adopted the growth curve as a clinical tool for health. Behind this practice lies a socioeconomically, culturally, and politically complex interplay of individuals and institutions around the world. In this review, we highlight the often forgotten past, current state of practice, and future potential of this powerful clinical tool: the growth reference chart, with a particular focus on clinical genetics practice. The goal of this article is to understand ongoing work in the field of anthropometry (the scientific study of human measurements) and its direct impact on modern pediatric and genetic patient care.

Current practice in diagnostic genetic testing of the epilepsies

Epilepsy genetics is a rapidly developing field, in which novel disease-associated genes, novel mechanisms associated with epilepsy, and precision medicine approaches are continuously being identified. In the past decade, advances in genomic knowledge and analysis platforms have begun to make clinical genetic testing accessible for, in principle, people of all ages with epilepsy. For this reason, the Genetics Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) presents this update on clinical genetic testing practice, including current techniques, indications, yield of genetic testing, recommendations for pre- and post-test counseling, and follow-up after genetic testing is completed. We acknowledge that the resources vary across different settings but highlight that genetic diagnostic testing for epilepsy should be prioritized when the likelihood of an informative finding is high. Results of genetic testing, in particular the identification of causative genetic variants, are likely to improve individual care. We emphasize the importance of genetic testing for individuals with epilepsy as we enter the era of precision therapy.

Test/Retest Reliability of a Turkish Version of the Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey.

Background and Purpose: The Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS) was developed to evaluate the use of genetics in clinical practice. This study aimed to translate the GGNPS into Turkish and perform the test/retest reliability. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional research design was used to collect data. Data were collected two times with ~3-7 weeks apart by using RedCap software. Results: At Time 1, a total of 385 nurses completed the survey; at Time 2, 88 nurses completed the retest survey. Findings show that one item has a slight agreement, 9 items fair agreements and 18 items moderate agreements, and 19 items substantial agreements between Times 1 and 2. Conclusions: The Turkish version of GGNPS appears to be a reliable instrument.

EP217: Ophthalmology genetics clinic in the times of COVID-19: A hybrid model

Multidisciplinary clinics are common in clinical genetics practice, as they allow the expertise of multiple providers within a single visit and enable improved coordination of care and patient experiences. Our team initiated a combined Ophthalmology Genetics clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic, requiring creativity to enable appropriate social distancing in the context of spatial constraints. The goal of this clinic is to provide comprehensive ophthalmologic and genetics care for individuals with both syndromic and nonsyndromic ocular differences.

Assessing the acceptability, feasibility, and usefulness of a psychosocial screening tool to patients and clinicians in a clinical genetics service in Australia

Increasing demand for clinical genetic services may impact the resources and quality of genetic counseling, potentially impacting patient outcomes. Using a psychosocial screening tool may aid the provision of genetic counseling by reliably identifying patients' psychosocial needs. The Genetic Psychosocial Risk Instrument (GPRI) is a validated genetic-specific screening tool designed to identify psychological risk factors that predict distress in patients having genetic testing. This questionnaire-based study investigated the perceived acceptability, feasibility, and usefulness of the GPRI in patients and clinicians in routine clinical genetic practice. From December 2018 to January 2019, 154 patients attending an Australian clinical genetic service were invited to complete a paper-based survey that included the GPRI. The GPRI was scored and provided to the clinician for use in the appointment. In February 2019, clinicians completed an anonymous online survey regarding acceptability, feasibility, and usefulness of the GPRI. Descriptive statistics, chi-squared, t tests, and regression analyses were used to analyze the patient data, and descriptive statistics were employed for clinician surveys. A total of 145 patients participated (94% response rate). The average GPRI score was 46.3 (95% CI 43.6-49.0) with 41% of patients meeting the 50-point threshold indicating high risk for psychological distress. The GPRI was highly acceptable to patients, regardless of their level of psychosocial risk. Fourteen clinicians participated (54% response rate): 85% found the GPRI not too time consuming, and 86% believed it improved patient care by identifying patient needs. All were willing to use the GPRI routinely. The use of the GPRI is highly acceptable to patients and clinicians in this setting, assisting in identifying patients at risk for distress, prompting clinicians to address concerns, provide psychosocial support, and consider ongoing referral. As 41% of patients' scores indicated a high risk of distress, the GPRI is an important tool for potentially enhancing overall patient outcomes.

The Role of the European Society of Human Genetics in Delivering Genomic Education.

The European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) was founded in 1967 as a professional organisation for members working in genetics in clinical practice, research and education. The Society seeks the integration of scientific research and its implementation into clinical practice and the education of specialists and the public in all areas of medical and human genetics. The Society works to do this through many approaches, including educational sessions at the annual conference; training courses in general and specialist areas of genetics; an online resource of educational materials (EuroGEMS); and a mentorship scheme. The ESHG Education Committee is implementing new approaches to expand the reach of its educational activities and portfolio. With changes in technology, appreciation of the utility of genomics in healthcare and the public’s and patients’ increased awareness of the role of genomics, this review will summarise how the ESHG is adapting to deliver innovative educational activity.

Clinical genetics in transition\u2014a comparison of genetic services in Estonia, Finland, and the Netherlands

Genetics has traditionally enabled the reliable diagnosis of patients with rare genetic disorders, thus empowering the key role of today’s clinical geneticists in providing healthcare. With the many novel technologies that have expanded the genetic toolkit, genetics is increasingly evolving beyond rare disease diagnostics. When placed in a transition context—like we do here—clinical genetics is likely to become a fully integral part of future healthcare and clinical genetic expertise will be required increasingly outside traditional clinical genetic settings. We explore transition effects on the thinking (culture), organizing (structure), and performing (practice) in clinical genetics, taking genetic healthcare in Estonia, Finland, and the Netherlands as examples. Despite clearly distinct healthcare histories, all three countries have initially implemented genetic healthcare in a rather similar fashion: as a diagnostic tool for predominantly rare congenital diseases, with clinical geneticists as the main providers. Dynamics at different levels, such as emerging technologies, biobanks and data infrastructure, and legislative frameworks, may require development of a new system attuned with the demands and (historic) context of specific countries. Here, we provide an overview of genetic service provisions in Estonia, Finland, and the Netherlands to consider the impact of historic and recent events on prospective developments in genetic healthcare.

A Multi-Strategy Sequencing Workflow in Inherited Retinal Dystrophies: Routine Diagnosis, Addressing Unsolved Cases and Candidate Genes Identification.

The management of unsolved inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD) cases is challenging since no standard pipelines have been established. This study aimed to define a diagnostic algorithm useful for the diagnostic routine and to address unsolved cases. Here, we applied a Next-Generation Sequencing-based workflow, including a first step of panel sequencing (PS) followed by clinical-exome sequencing (CES) and whole-exome sequencing (WES), in 46 IRD patients belonging to 42 families. Twenty-six likely causal variants in retinal genes were found by PS and CES. CES and WES allowed proposing two novel candidate loci (WDFY3 and a X-linked region including CITED1), both abundantly expressed in human retina according to RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. After comparison studies, PS showed the best quality and cost values, CES and WES involved similar analytical efforts and WES presented the highest diagnostic yield. These results reinforce the relevance of panels as a first step in the diagnostic routine and suggest WES as the next strategy for unsolved cases, reserving CES for the simultaneous study of multiple conditions. Standardizing this algorithm would enhance the efficiency and equity of clinical genetics practice. Furthermore, the identified candidate genes could contribute to increase the diagnostic yield and expand the mutational spectrum in these disorders.

Clinical genetic testing and counselling in autism spectrum disorder

Abstract Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are phenotypically as well as genetically heterogeneous developmental disorders with a strong heritability. Clinical and basic science research has described many replicated genetic risk factors. Many findings can well be translated into clinical human genetic practice. The current article summarizes results of genetic studies in ASD, provides a diagnostic algorithm for the clinical human genetic work-up reflecting the German health care system options and gives information with regard to the obligatory genetic counselling after a clinical genetic assessment.

The difference in knowledge and concerns between healthcare professionals and patients about genetic-related issues: A questionnaire-based study.

Effective adoption of genetics in clinical practice requires the support of and interaction between the different partners of healthcare system; healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients. The study aimed to assess and compare the knowledge, factors affecting the knowledge, and concerns of HCPs and patients regarding genetic-related issues such as lack of knowledge about genetics and genetic conditions, awareness of the importance of genetics in clinical practice and genetic services and resources deficits. A cross sectional study was conducted in different areas of Jordan using a convenient sampling approach. An English questionnaire was self-administered to HCPs. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with patients in Arabic by trained researcher. A total of 1000 HCPs and 1448 patients were recruited. There was a significant difference (p<0.001) in the knowledge between HCPs and patients. Among HCPs, physicians (OR = 2.278, 95%CI = 1.410–3.680, p = 0.001) and pharmacists (OR = 2.163, 95%CI = 1.362–3.436, p = 0.001) were more knowledgeable than nurses. In addition, females were more knowledgeable than males (OR = 1.717, 95%CI = 1.203–2.451, p = 0.003). Among patients, participants who had a bachelor degree (OR = 1.579, 95%CI = 1.231–2.025, p<0.001) were more knowledgeable compared to those who only had school education. HCPs appeared to have more concerns than patients (p<0.001) regarding all genetic-related issues. These findings suggested a positive association between education and genetic knowledge as well as concerns; as HCPs were more knowledgeable and concerned than patients. Appropriate integration and expansion of basic genetic knowledge courses and clinical genetic training in the curriculum should be adopted to prepare HCPs to enhance the integration of genetic information in clinical settings.

Clinical Genetics Lacks Standard Definitions and Protocols for the Collection and Use of Diversity Measures

Genetics researchers and clinical professionals rely on diversity measures such as race, ethnicity, and ancestry (REA) to stratify study participants and patients for a variety of applications in research and precision medicine. However, there are no comprehensive, widely accepted standards or guidelines for collecting and using such data in clinical genetics practice. Two NIH-funded research consortia, the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) and Clinical Sequencing Evidence-generating Research (CSER), have partnered to address this issue and report how REA are currently collected, conceptualized, and used. Surveying clinical genetics professionals and researchers (n = 448), we found heterogeneity in the way REA are perceived, defined, and measured, with variation in the perceived importance of REA in both clinical and research settings. The majority of respondents (>55%) felt that REA are at least somewhat important for clinical variant interpretation, ordering genetic tests, and communicating results to patients. However, there was no consensus on the relevance of REA, including how each of these measures should be used in different scenarios and what information they can convey in the context of human genetics. A lack of common definitions and applications of REA across the precision medicine pipeline may contribute to inconsistencies in data collection, missing or inaccurate classifications, and misleading or inconclusive results. Thus, our findings support the need for standardization and harmonization of REA data collection and use in clinical genetics and precision health research.

The changing face of clinical genetics service delivery in the era of genomics: a framework for monitoring service delivery and data from a comprehensive metropolitan general genetics service

PurposeClinical genetics is an evolving specialty impacted by the availability of increasingly sophisticated investigational technologies. Methods for monitoring the changes in workload and workflow are necessary to ensure adequate service resourcing. MethodsA literature search of known workload and workflow studies was completed, identifying metrics of value. A framework of metrics to allow consistent capture in clinical genetics practice was developed. This framework was then applied to local general genetics service data to evaluate recent changes in service delivery. ResultsLiterature regarding service delivery metrics in clinical genetics services is limited and inconsistent in application. The metric framework generated is a useful tool for consistent and ongoing evaluation of general genetics services. Through application of the framework, new service delivery trends and significant changes in workload were identified. ConclusionStudies of clinical genetics service delivery suffer from the use of inconsistent metrics. This framework will allow for monitoring of changes to service delivery, caseload volume, caseload complexity, and workforce over time. Local data presented demonstrate the significant effect that implementing clinical genomic sequencing has had on clinical service delivery. Applying this framework produces a comprehensive service characterization, enabling funding bodies to justify resourcing that addresses the growing demand of clinical genetics.