Clinical Frailty Score Research Articles

BN SO51 - Complications from operative cholangiogram during emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A retrospective, observational cohort study in a UK single centre

Abstract Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a common surgical procedure, with >60,000 undertaken annually in the UK. One serious complication of cholecystectomy is bile-duct-injury (BDI), with an incidence of 0.28–1.5%. The use of intraoperative-cholangiogram (OTC) has been shown to aid in earlier diagnosis and treatment of BDI. Although advocated as routine by many, no studies have assessed the morbidity caused by OTC. With newer modalities available, such as indocyanine-green-fluorescent-cholangiography (ICGC) and three-dimensional laparoscopy, it is important to consider each method's risks and benefits, including OTC. We decided to investigate the morbidity caused by OTC with an emphasis on post-OTC acute pancreatitis. Method We conducted a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected cohort of patients aged 18 and over who have undergone emergency LC, defined as LC within seven days from admission with acute cholecystitis, over three years in a UK district general hospital. The primary outcome studied was the incidence of complications following OTC, including acute pancreatitis (AP), acute cholangitis, extra-hepatic biliary tree injury and hepatic abscess. The STROBE (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology) checklist was utilised. We used GraphPad Prism 10.2.3. for statistical analysis. Results 472 cases were analysed. Median age was 54(A), BMI 31(C), ASA grade 2(D), clinical frailty score 2(E), Charlson Comorbidity Index 1(F), Tokyo severity grade 1(K) and female-to-male ratio 0.83(B). 14.31% of cases had pre-op CBD dilatation, 0.42% CBD stones and 6.19% both, with most having ultrasound pre-op (J-I). The median Nassar score was 3(L). 24.57 % of cases had an OTC done, with a median volume of contrast-media used of 11(6;24.5) mls, with 17 cases having CBD stones diagnosed(M-O). Four cases, or 3.44% of the total OTCs, developed acute pancreatitis (P). Conclusion Emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiogram may increase the risk of postoperative acute pancreatitis.

EGS SO11 - A Retrospective Review of Perioperative Outcomes after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Older Patients

Abstract Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the definitive treatment for gallstone-related disease. With an increasingly aging population, a growing number of elderly patients are presenting acutely with gallstone pathology. However, rates of perioperative mortality and complications are significantly higher in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Kamarajah et al). We aim to evaluate peri-operative outcomes in elderly patients presenting with acute gallstone disease who have been clinically evaluated to be appropriate for emergency cholecystectomy, and explore the impact of frailty on these outcomes. Method A retrospective study was performed on patients over the age of 75 presenting acutely with gallstone disease over a 3-year period. Data on perioperative complications, mortality at 1 year, post-operative length of stay (LOS) and 90-day readmissions were collected and analysed. The patient’s pre-operative fitness was categorized using the ASA classification of physical status and the Clinical frailty score (CFS); a 9-point scale quantifying frailty based on function. Statistical significance was assessed to determine differences between the age or frailty score groups. Results 592 patients attended hospital with gallstone-related pathology; 99 patients underwent emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 486 patients were managed conservatively, and 25 patients had cholecystostomies. The post-operative mortality rate was 4%, post-operative complication 19.2% and readmission rate 11.1%. Post-operative LOS was significantly longer in frailer patients (p=0.02299). There were no statistically significant differences in mortality or post-operative complications between the CFS3 or less and CFS4 or more groups, although a general trend towards higher rates of complications and mortality was noted with increasing frailty. Conclusion Patients over 75 years of age should be carefully considered before proceeding with surgical management. Although older and frailer patients exhibited increased rates of complications and mortality post-operatively, these didn't reach statistical significance, reflecting the role of clinical decision-making regarding surgical fitness. Even for a pre-selected patient group, there is statistically significant prolonged post-operative LOS in frailer patients. This suggests a need for comprehensive preoperative assessment in this population, and a combination of CFS and ASA may be key determinants. Further studies assessing frailty and non-operative outcomes are required to substantiate these findings and guide clinical management in this population.

EGS SO19 - Outcome Analysis of Laparotomies in the Elderly Population in Devon: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract Background Emergency laparotomy is understood to be high risk in the elderly, but there is limited long term outcome data. This study assesses long term outcomes in the elderly including: survival and functional outcomes. Method Patients, aged 80 and above, were identified from the prospective National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) database, who underwent surgery between: January 2020 and August 2023 at Torbay Hospital. Surviving patients were followed up. 132 cases were undertaken. Mean age was 85 years. Most common ASA was 3. Preoperative clinical frailty score was 6, and 89% were living at home without care. Results 50% of patients were admitted to intensive care. 17% were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. The most common reason for was fall. 20% of patients did not survive to discharge. 38% did not survive to August 2023. 46% of patients returned home independently; 5% had care at home; 26% were discharged to community hospital and 2% to care home. By January 2024 61% of survivors were living independently with no functional decline. Most commonly, patients needed support with bathing/stairs/dressing (37%). 11% of respondents were completely dependent. Conclusion Emergency laparotomy confers a significant mortality, morbidity and risk to an elderly patient’s long term functional status. We believe this information is essential for surgical decision making and the consent process.

A practical risk score for prediction of 6-month mortality in patients with acute heart failure: CHAM2P2

Abstract Background Admission with acute heart failure carries a poor prognosis. Multiple predictive risk scores exist in heart failure presentation, however the utility of these scores in acute heart failure setting among older adults is limited. Aim The purpose of this study was to develop a practical risk score to predict 6-month mortality in patients presenting with acute heart failure. Methods Between January-August 2020, 474 consecutive patients (mean age 80 ± 11 years) admitted with acute heart failure to a large tertiary hospital in the South-West of England were identified. Data was retrospectively collected on admission bloods, comorbidities, imaging, echocardiography and post discharge mortality. Prediction modelling with multivariate Cox regression was then used to identify clinically relevant predictors of six-month mortality. Continuous variables were dichotomised around the mean/median for simplification. Variables were assigned points proportional to hazard ratios on Cox regression. Results Mortality at six months was 34% (161/474). Cox regression identified five significant (p<0.05) predictors of mortality: C: Clinical Frailty Score>5, H: hospital stay >10 days, A: age >80yrs, M: malignancy (current or previous) history and P: NT pro-BNP>4500pg/ml. In our final model, malignancy and NT pro-BNP were assigned two points with the remainder being assigned one. In total, 304 patients had data available to generate CHAM2P2 scores. Mortality increased sequentially from 16.0% in patients with CHAM2P2 0-2, 44.4% in patients with CHAM2P2 scores of 3-5 and 94.1% in patients with CHAM2P2 scores of 6 or 7 (log rank <0.01). AUC demonstrated good discriminatory value of the CHAM2P2 score in predicting six-month mortality (AUC 0.74). Conclusion The CHAM2P2 score is a readily available and simple tool to predict 6-month mortality in patients admitted with acute heart failure.

Perioperative and frailty outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common procedure with an increasing demand, especially among the elderly. Frailty is known to be associated with adverse perioperative outcomes in the older population. In this article, we aimed to understand the associations of preoperative frailty status and comorbid conditions in relation to their clinical and healthcare outcomes after TKA, and to describe the perioperative factors leading to improvement in a patient's frailty status after TKA. This is a retrospective cohort study, and the outcomes were assessed over 2 years. Frailty is defined by the Clinical Frailty Score. A total of 96 patient records were assessed, of which 13 (13.5%) patients were robust and 83 (86.5%) patients were prefrail or frail. Two years after TKA, the number of robust patients increased to 58 (61.7%) patients, showing a reversal of frailty in 48.2% of patients. Total knee arthroplasty in prefrail and frail patients is a safe procedure that leads to improvement of frailty status, with an increase in the proportion of patients becoming robust within 2 years after the operation.

COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality in people with multiple long-term conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 4 million people.

To describe the direct impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection on morbidity and mortality in people with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs). A systematic review and meta-analysis including observational studies. Studies conducted between 1 January 2020 and 4 May 2023 across 51 countries were identified from five databases. A total of 4,084,469 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) for mortality, hospitalisation, severe disease, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mechanical ventilation were estimated with random effect meta-analysis models. A total of 38,356 studies were identified and 111 included. In most (74%) of the studies, MLTCs referred to having two or more long-term conditions. Others described MLTCs by high weighted indices: the Charlson Comorbidity Index in 11% and the Clinical Frailty Score in 7%. Using the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool for observational studies, the risk of bias was judged as low and moderate in 86 and 25 studies, respectively. Having MLTCs was associated with increased mortality (RR: 2.61 [95% CI: 2.27 to 3.0]); hospitalisation (2.4 [1.92 to 2.99]); severe disease (2.61 [1.92 to 3.54]); ICU admission (1.22 [1.07 to 1.39]) and mechanical ventilation (1.83 [1.18 to 2.84]) compared with those with no MLTCs. Pooled RRs for adverse outcomes were higher in children and young people compared with all age groups. In meta-regression analyses, men were more likely to need ICU admission (p = 0.013) and mechanical ventilation (p = 0.002). Public health policies, clinical and preventative interventions should prioritise people with MLTCs to minimise direct adverse outcomes from COVID-19 disease.

Frailty as a Predictor of COVID-19 Mortality in the South Indian Population: An Observational Study.

Background Frailty is a clinical syndrome characterized by diminished strength, endurance, and physiological function that significantly increases vulnerability to adverse health outcomes, including infections. In the context of COVID-19, frailty has emerged as a critical risk factor for severe disease, complications, and mortality, particularly in older adults. The severity and fatality rates among the geriatric group were notably high, as the virus's pathogenesis, marked by prolonged inflammation, contributed to increased morbidity and mortality in this age group. The study was conducted to explore the role of frailty in influencing mortality among the elderly affected by COVID-19. Objective The objective of this study was to identify the association between frailty and mortality in COVID-19-affected elderly patients. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study among elderly patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and received treatment in a tertiary care hospital. Data were collected from 250 patients from March 2021 to December 2021. Lab parameters, the necessity for mechanical ventilation, the need for oxygen use, and the number of days of hospital stay were recorded. The Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) was used to evaluate frailty. The chi-square test with Fisher's exact test was used to assess the association between frailty and mortality in the data set. Multivariate binary logistic regression was employed to identify the most significant predictors of mortality. Results Among the 250 patients, 159 (63.6%) survived and were discharged, while 91 (36.4%) succumbed to the illness. Fifty-eight patients were not identified as frail, and there were no deaths in the group. On the contrary, among the 192 COVID-positive patients who were identified as frail, 91 (47.4%) patients died, and 101 (52.6%) patients were alive. This depicted the association between frailty and mortality in COVID-19 geriatric patients. While assessing comorbidities, malignancy (53.3%, p-value = 0.009) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (43.3%) had a significant association with mortality. Symptoms like fever (43.6%), dyspnea (68.6%), myalgia (20%), and altered sensorium (84%) showed a strong correlation with mortality (p<0.001). Frailty was a significant predictor of mortality, with 47.4% of frail patients not surviving (p<0.001). Biochemical markers including leukocytosis (64.8%), neutrophilia (65.3%), eosinopenia (66.9%), anemia (57.8%), hypoalbuminemia (63.5%), hypoproteinemia (70.1%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (66%),aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (65.2%), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (67.5%), elevated creatinine (68.9%), hypernatremia (100%), hyperkalemia (80%), and elevated D-dimer (44.7%) were all significantly linked to mortality. Additionally, patients requiring oxygen (65%), ventilation (96.8%), or bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) (77.8%) had higher mortality rates. A shorter length of hospital stay was also associated with increased mortality (24%). Conclusion Frailty, combined with certain comorbidities such as cancer and CKD, along with various clinical and biochemical markers, played a significant role in predicting mortality among geriatric COVID-19 patients. Incorporating frailty assessments into routine evaluations for elderly COVID-19 survivors could be beneficial. Early detection and focused management of these high-risk factors are essential for improving outcomes in frail patients within tertiary care settings.

Implementation of a multidisciplinary approach to care for people with HIV aged 80 years and over.

Frailty adversely affects health and quality of life of people with HIV (PWH). A multidisciplinary-team (MDT) was established to perform a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and to address modifiable risk factors in elderly PWH. PWH aged over 80years were reviewed by a dedicated HIV/geriatric clinic at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital. Descriptive statistics were used to report the variables of interest. Sixty-three PWH were reviewed, with a median age of 82 (IQR 80-86). Fifty-seven (88%) were men. The median number of co-morbidities was five (IQR 4-7) and polypharmacy was seen in 55 (85%), with a median of six (IQR 5-8) co-medications reported. The median Rockwood Clinical Frailty Score was two (IQR 2-5). Antiretrovirals were modernised in 18 (29%) individuals; co-medication changes and de-prescribing was recommended in 39 (62%). A MDT approach helped reducing polypharmacy and frailty, suggesting that specialised tools and MDT input are key to identify medical and social concerns in elderly PWH.

Frail Patients Referred to a Community Specialist Team- What Were Their Frailty Scores?

Abstract Background Frailty is synonymous with older patients, where multiple body systems slowly lose their reserves and lead patients to become more vulnerable. When developing the inclusion criteria for our integrated care programme for older persons (ICPOP), the limited resources and large geographical area played a role. In order to maximize the outcomes for patients we targeted those with a Rockwood Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) between 4 and 6. We perceived that these patients would benefit from multidisciplinary intervention. Methods All patients referred to ICPOP were reviewed from November 2022 to April 2024. Our electronic patient database records information on ICPOP patients. Using this database we searched for the word “frailty” in the reason for referral field. We also correlated this with any patients who had a CFS recorded. The level of frailty in older patients with the scores ranging from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill) was recorded. Results 182 patients were found during the database search. 55 patients were referred for frailty alone, 64 patients were referred for frailty with balance/mobility issues, 47 patients were referred for frailty with falls, 16 patients were referred for frailty with memory issues. CFS were available for 132/182(73%) patients. 119/132(90 %) patients with a CFS score were classified as scoring between 4 and 6 on the Rockwood scale. 3/132(2%) scored 2, 6/132(5%) scored 3 and 4/132(3%) scored 7 on the CFS. Conclusion The national ICPOP framework prioritise improving care of frail older patients. A measure of a persons’ frailty level is subjective and dependent on clinical judgement along with a good understanding of the term “frailty”. Overall, our findings highlight that the referrers to our service have a good knowledge of frailty as a term. Our ICPOP hub is also effectively targeting the appropriate cohort of patients as per our inclusion criteria.

Community-based Geriatric Assessments: Is There an Urban/Rural Divide?

Abstract Background There is a paucity of literature describing urban/rural differences in baseline demographic factors and patterns of referral for those undergoing community based comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in Ireland. We analysed differences in baseline demographics, referral sources and referral reasons among older persons who underwent CGA with a community specialist team, which accepts referrals from one predominantly rural community health network (CHN) and one predominantly urban CHN. Methods Data including baseline demographic characteristics, reasons for referral, referral sources, clinical frailty score (CFS), prevalence of polypharmacy (more than 10 prescribed medicines) and location of CGA was prospectively collected on all persons referred to an older persons' integrated care service from February 2023 to March 2024 and who underwent CGA. Data was stored on a secure database. Persons were categorised as either urban dwelling or rural dwelling, based on their local CHN. Descriptive statistics were used to describe differences between the urban and rural cohorts. Results 235 persons characterised as urban underwent CGA and 191 persons characterised as rural underwent CGA. There was a higher median CFS score amongst rural persons (CFS = 5, IQR=2) compared to urban persons (CFS=4, IQR=2). Urban persons were more likely to be referred by their G.P. (81% of total referrals) compared with rural persons (67%). Rural persons were more likely to be male (48% vs 37%) and experience polypharmacy (33% vs 27%) than urban persons. A similar proportion of persons underwent initial CGA in their home (20% rural vs 19% urban). Conclusion Here we describe the characteristics of urban and rural users attending an integrated care service. Future research should examine how these differences might affect healthcare utilisation and outcomes and provide opportunity to inform regional health and social care planning.

A Novel Discharge Pathway for Older Adults presenting to the Emergency Department

Abstract Background A need was identified for an urgent therapy follow-up at home for older adults presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). The acute floor team worked together within an established therapy outreach team (for inpatients) to develop an ED outreach pathway within existing resources. The outreach team members worked within ED to ensure standardisation of assessment, practice and build strong working relationships. A trusted assessor approach was applied. The outreach team had access to the wider acute floor team including ANP for in-reach support if needed. Methods A review of the patient group who discharged home from ED using this new pathway was completed including demographics, presenting complaint, clinical frailty score (CFS) and intervention provided. Results To date, 30 patients have discharged from the ED with the therapy outreach team. Most (70%) were female and mean age 83. Presenting complaint included fall no fracture (50%, n=15), fall with fracture (26%, n=8), musculoskeletal injury (17%, n= 5) and functional decline (6%, n=2). The mean CFS was 5.1, with most (86%) living with mild to moderate frailty (CFS 4-6). All patients were offered a next clinical day home based functional and environmental assessment, continuing the assessment commenced by the acute floor team in ED. Interventions included transfers and mobility training, activities of daily living (personal/domestic/instrumental) training, carer education, environmental advice, falls education, support with care packages, liaising with other healthcare professionals and equipment provision including mobility aids, bed-levers, toilet-aids and rails. Conclusion A therapy lead team, supported by the wider acute floor team, can provide a safe alternative discharge pathway from the ED for older adults that can avoid admission with rapid therapy input at home. Future work will examine re-admission rates, re-presentation rates to ED and patient and stakeholder satisfaction.

Development of a Hospital Wide Inpatient Frailty Screening Pathway in a Model-2 Hospital

Abstract Background Our model-2 hospital is experiencing a higher proportion of frail older adults presenting to our medical assessment unit (MAU) and via direct ward admissions. Frailty increases the risk of co-morbidity, falls and mortality during hospital admission. Screening for frailty a point of admission allows early identification of these patients who are at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Early frailty screening also assists healthcare professionals with multidisciplinary team (MDT) management and treatment plans. Our hospital frailty committee established a frailty screening pathway for all inpatients aged 75 years and older to screen for frailty and minimise the risk of adverse outcomes secondary to frailty. Methods A hospital wide consultant chaired frailty committee was established with stakeholders from the MDT. Two separate screening pathways were developed, one for MAU admissions and one for direct ward admissions. A standardised frailty policy and standardised operating procedure (SOP) with algorithm illustration were compiled. Hospital wide education emphasised the development of a bespoke Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) sticker in conjunction with referral pathways to the newly established Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) For The Older Adult. In each pathway CFS-screening is completed for adults ≥75years at first-point of contact using the CFS, a score ≥6 triggers onward referral, CNS for inpatient and public health nurse for MAU discharged patients. Results Both pathways are established and used effectively and routinely on a daily basis. Associated educational sessions have emphasised the importance of frailty in our inpatient cohort. Conclusion The developed algorithms have been useful for identifying frailty and improving patient care with onward CNS referral. Future audits will assess effectiveness of screening and support advancement of frailty committee objectives via supporting business cases for resourcing.

Unexpected Journeys: Investigating Urgent and Emergency Care Trends of Patients Attending a Community Specialist Team for Older Adults

Abstract Background Transitions of care for older people via ICPOP and Urgent and Emergency Care (UEC) pathways are becoming more complex. Demand for unscheduled care for older adults with complex care needs will increase with an ageing society, requiring proactive case management and practical realisation of integrated care pathways. Methods Retrospective analysis of UEC presentations of older patients attending a community specialist team (CST) who underwent Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) between January-July 2023. Demographics and functional status [Clinical Frailty Score (CFS), Barthel Index (BI), Lawton-Brody Score (IADL), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)] were extracted, along with UEC presentations post-CGA until March 2024. Results 356 patients underwent CGA and 42% (n=148) had subsequent unscheduled care attendance(s). Of those with an UEC attendance 36% (n=54) lived alone. Median functional scores were: CFS 5, BI 17, IADL 3, MOCA 17. Median time to UEC presentation was 100 days since CGA. There were 283 UEC interactions in total. 39% (n=58) had &amp;gt;1 interaction. 73% (n=206) of interactions resulted in acute hospital admissions, 21% (n=58) were ED visits, and 6% (n=19) were Pathfinder interactions. Falls (31%) and infection (19%) were the leading causes for presentation. Of 206 admissions, 61% were admitted under medical specialties, 26% under Geriatric Medicine, and 13% under Surgery. Average hospital stay was 13 days. 65% (n=134), were discharged home, 11% (n=22) to transitional care beds, 7% (n=15) to rehabilitation, 7% (n=14) to nursing home, 3% (n=5) transferred to other hospitals, 7%(n=15) died. Conclusion Over half of patients attending a CST had an UEC presentation, reflecting the complexity of this cohort and their level of healthcare utilisation. Case management roles that complement and pull together existing elements of the older persons pathway are lacking across healthcare settings and are fundamental to successful implementation of a patient-centred age friendly health system.

Introduction of Geriatric Medicine Multidisciplinary Service to Emergency Department

Abstract Background Ireland has an ageing demographic with a significant community dwelling population living with frailty. Identification of frailty at the hospital front door via a Geriatric Emergency Multidisciplinary Service (GEMS) was expanded in October 2023 with the aim to trigger early comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in the Emergency Department (ED)and to ensure that older people with frailty are diverted to the most appropriate services as quickly as possible and, where appropriate, discharged home on the same day. Methods Using Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycle framework a screening pathway for all over 75-year-olds who present to ED was established. The service provides screening for frailty and delirium (using 4AT) in the ED with high clinical frailty scores (CFS) or requiring specialist input were selected for CGA. Information was collected on all patients on admission and data was also collected on discharge destination and readmission rates. Results 1308 patients were reviewed since introduction with average age 82.3 years (68-101). 63.6% (832) patients had CGA and 36.4% (476) were screened. Of those who did not have a CGA, 46.1% (185) were not frail with CFS 3 or less. Average CFS was 4.84 and average 4AT score was 2. 46.7% (611) of patients reviewed were discharged from ED with discharge rates increasing from 40.9% (93) in November 2023 to 49.5% (104) in April 2024 and 28-day readmission rates decreasing from 6.87% in April 2023 to 5.98% in March 2024. Conclusion This quality improvement project highlights the impact of GEMS in the ED in reducing admission rates and readmissions. Ongoing areas for improvement include expanding the service to review all patients identified with frailty where possible, and in the future establishing pathways for improved access to community services/supports to further reduce readmission rates and to capture the impact on length of stay.

Supporting Complex Severely Frail Patients at Home with Community Specialist Team Intervention

Abstract Background The Community Specialist Team for Older Persons (CST-OP) was created to support older people to live well at home. The team primarily aims to reduce ED presentations and admissions into acute facilities for over 65s. The team became the first fully staffed CST-OP in Q3 2022. Referrals are responded to within 24-48 hours and each referral has a comprehensive geriatric assessment completed. Interdisciplinary assessment is used to identify interventional needs which the team then addresses. This abstract specifically examines the success of supporting people with a Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) of 7 and above to remain at home. Methods The team consists of a senior 1 WTE Social Worker, Physiotherapist, Therapy Assistant, Consultant Geriatrician, Advanced Nurse Practitioner and Clinical Nurse Specialist. The team also has 0.5 WTE Senior Speech and Language Therapist and Dietician. Referrals are accepted from the FIT team, GPs and Older Persons OPD clinic. The team operates on a 100% domiciliary based assessment. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is completed with each referral. A care plan is generated, and interdisciplinary intervention carried out. Results From September 2022 to December 2023 69 patients with a CFS of 7 or above were reviewed by the CST-OP. 60 remained at home, 7 transitioned to LTC and 2 RIP. These figures represent an 86% success rate. Conclusion Evidence suggests older people living with severe frailty can be supported to live well at home by Community Specialist Teams via timely interdisciplinary assessment and intervention and appropriate utilisation of community supports.

Characterisation of Patients with Self-Neglect – `Room to Improve' with a New Potential Geriatric Giant?

Abstract Background Self-Neglect is an under-reported and often veiled diagnosis which is defined as ‘an adult’s inability due to physical or mental impairment or diminished capacity to perform essential self-care tasks. Self-Neglect is an independent risk factor for death and is associated with morbidity, heavy utilisation of healthcare services and safeguarding issues. Self-Neglect affects more older persons and is more commonly seen in people with cognitive deficits and social isolation. Methods Using HIPE data, patients were selected for a Descriptive Retrospective Chart Review with a diagnosis of Self-Neglect and under the care of a Consultant Geriatrician within a 2-year timeframe from April 2022 to April 2024. Data was compiled and demographics were collated. Charlson Co-Morbidity Index, Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 and Clinical Frailty Scores were employed. Results Twenty patient's charts were reviewed retrospectively. Of the twenty patients 65% were male, 40% are rural dwelling and 70% live alone. 95% of patients have an underlying cognitive impairment, and over 90% have a current or remote history of substance abuse. All 20 patients had significant concerns highlighted about their housing and 60% of patients required alternative accommodation while their home was updated or cleaned. All 20 patients required discharge planning with many requiring complex multi-disciplinary input regarding their safe discharge and had prolonged inpatient stays. Conclusion Recognition and resourcing ‘Self Neglect’ pathways will remain an issue in the health service in Ireland and worldwide. Patients presenting to hospitals with Self-Neglect are multi-morbid, socially complex and tread the line between autonomy and public health issues. Creating a service pathway that puts this vulnerable cohort at the centre and that could span both inpatient and community streams would be beneficial to the over-stretched health service but most importantly to the patient.

Does an Inpatient Rehabilitation Admission Via the Community Prevent Hospital Readmissions in Older Adults? An Integrated Care Initiative

Abstract Background Rehabilitation interventions are essential in supporting frail older adult’s recovery following periods of decompensation and preventing future hospitalizations. Previously patients (age &amp;gt; 65 years) could only access inpatient rehabilitation via an inpatient stay in an acute hospital. Within the ICT (Integrated Care Team) in Dublin North West (DNW) a community rehabilitation pathway to two inpatient rehabilitation units exists. We retrospectively evaluated patients that were admitted to rehabilitation units via this pathway and measured their 90-day readmission rate to their local acute hospital. Methods 17 referrals were received from three pathways: Primary Care, the Holly Day clinic and the Frailty Intervention Team (FITT). Clinical frailty score’s (CFS), Falls risk (as per the world falls guidelines) and sarcopenia status as per the European Consensus on the definition of sarcopenia (EWGSOP) were recorded prior to admission. Readmissions within 90 days were collected from the hospital electronic database. Results CFS scores ranged from 5 to 7. All patients were identified as a high risk of falls and sarcopenic. The 90-day readmission rate was 11%. 5.5% of these were due to falls and the other 5.5% was due to the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition. All had CFS score of &amp;gt;6. Conclusion Readmission to acute care is not common in our patient cohort and shows the involvement of the ICT Geriatrician and Physiotherapist in identifying and referring frail older adults for inpatient rehab is successful. Ongoing development of interagency pathways and further referrals is needed to further progress this pathway and measure its efficacy in preventing readmission to an acute hospital. A 90 day and 180 day follow up and falls risk outcome measure pre and post admission would further demonstrate the success of this initiative and help measure the efficacy of this initiative in reducing the risk of preventable hospitalizations in older adults.

Establishing The Role Of The Clinical Nurse Specialist For The Older Adult In A Model 2 Hospital

Abstract Background On average 87.5% of inpatients in our Model-2 Hospital are aged sixty-five years or above. Equally 57.5% of inpatients have medium to maximum dependency care needs. In order to meet the needs of this cohort of patients a new post “Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) For The Older Adult” was established in September 2023. Methods Using an online referral system, criteria for referral included i) new onset confusion or delirium, ii) clinical frailty score (CFS) of six or greater, iii) known Parkinson’s disease and iv) nursing or medical team clinical judgement. All reviewed patients received a comprehensive geriatric assessment using the Geriatric 5M framework (Mobility, Medications, Multi-Complexities, Mind and Matters Most) ensuring all aspects of patient care were assessed and promoting timely input from our multi-disciplinary team (Physiotherapy, Dietitian, Speech and Language Therapy, Occupational Therapy and Pharmacy). Results Over a period of 207 days the newly established CNS service received a total of 317 referrals. Two thirds (n=206, 65%) received CNS review, one third (n=111, 35%) did not; 45 (14%) were under the care of a consultant Geriatrician and not reviewed to avoid duplication and 66 (21%) were discharged before review could occur. Conclusion Referral numbers received since the established of the CNS post emphasises the need for the service in our hospital inpatient population. Development of the post has ensured that two-in-three referred patients receive a CNS lead CGA. Results from this pilot highlights the need to further develop and expand the service to target the one-in-five who missed review and further extension of the referral criteria.

Work of ART: Profiling the First 100 Patients Discharged Home From an Acute Hospital with the Active Recovery Team (ART)

Abstract Background The Active Recovery Team (ART) is a new therapy lead rehabilitation team that offers supported discharge and admission avoidance from a large acute hospital. This interdisciplinary team consists of a physiotherapist, occupational therapist, medical social worker and two therapy assistants. ART accepts referrals from all services within the hospital including the emergency department. Methods As ART is a new service, a retrospective audit of the first 100 patients who discharged on the pathway was completed. Demographics included age, sex, referring specialty, presenting complaint, frailty (measured by the Clinical Frailty Score) and level of input received. ART use the coding of low, medium and high intensity to describe the intervention provided based on dosage (visits) and complexity. Results Most (67%) of the group were female and mean age was 77 years. Only 8% were pre-frail (CFS 0-3), 86% were living with mild to moderate frailty (CFS 4-6) and 6% considered severely frail (CFS 7-9). The type of intervention patients received was 31% low, 33% medium and 36% high intensity. Referrals came from a range of specialties, but the highest percentage of referrals were from emergency medicine (29%), medicine (20%), orthopaedics (18%) and geriatric medicine (16%). Most (53%) initially presented post a fall at home. Most frequent reason for ART referral (78%) was that the patient was discharging home not at their functional baseline but had potential to an achieve a specific goal(s) with further input (most frequently within domains of mobility indoors/outdoors, transfers, stairs and activities of daily living). Conclusion This is an effective pathway that improves the transition from hospital to home. ART offer patients an opportunity for further rehabilitation at home with continuity of care from the acute hospital. Future work will examine the impact of ART on length of stay, readmission rate and explore patient satisfaction with this service.

An Audit Of Falls Admissions Documentation To A University Hospital: Cycle 1

Abstract Background 30% of adults aged 65 years and older experience a fall annually which can result in significant disability. The World Falls Guidelines (WFG) 2022 were developed to guide non-specialist clinicians in undertaking a falls assessment for high vs low/medium risk of further fall. Methods The medical admission list from July 2023-October 2023 was reviewed and 165 charts were requested for admissions listed as “fall’, ‘syncope’, ‘collapse’ and ‘pre-syncope’. Of 93 charts reviewed, 60 admissions were included in the audit. Of the 26 criteria listed in the WFG 2022, 10 were included in this audit. The index admission document was assessed for documentation of demographics, description of fall, any falls in preceding year, documentation of syncope, documentation of injury, cardiac and neuro examination, walking aids, comment on the cause of fall, medication review and time to mobility assessment. A pre-morbid Rockwood Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) was assigned on chart review. Results 40% were male and 60% were female. Mean age of patients was 80.25 years (SD=8.4) with a mean CFS of 3.6 (SD=1.89). 91.7% documented some descriptor of the fall, 50% documented asking about syncope, 33.3% documented asking about previous falls. 96.7% had a documented cardiac exam, while only 71.1% documented a neuro exam and 41,7% documenting mobility baseline. 60% had a medication review documented and 41.6% had mobility assessed in under 72 hours. Only 76.7% of admissions had a documented differential for the fall. Conclusion Further education is required to adequately risk stratify patients admitted with falls and help guide appropriate investigation and workup as well as promote thorough documentation. An education session was conducted with Medical SHOs on May 14th, 2024, and Cycle 2 of the audit will commence June 2024.