Clinical Cancer Center Research Articles

Developing a city-wide, community-engaged cancer disparities research agenda.

In response to high levels of cancer disparities in Philadelphia, PA, three NCI-designated clinical cancer centers formed Philadelphia Communities Conquering Cancer (PC3) to bring stakeholders together and establish infrastructure for future cancer reducing initiatives. The PC3 coalition aimed to develop a prioritized cancer disparities research agenda in order to align cancer center resources and research interests with the concerns of the community about cancer, and to ensure that initiatives were patient- and community-centered. Agenda development activities culminated in a city-wide cancer disparities conference. The conference, attended by 55 diverse stakeholders, was the venue for small group discussion sessions about cancer concerns related to prevention, early detection, treatment, survivorship, and quality of life. Sessions were guided by a moderator guide and were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analyzed by the PC3 leadership team. Results were reviewed and consensus was achieved with the help of PC3's Stakeholder Advisory Committee. Stakeholders identified four thematic areas as top priorities for cancer disparities research and action in Philadelphia: communication between patients, providers, and caregivers; education that reaches patients and community members with tailored and targeted information; navigation that assists people in finding and accessing the right cancer screening or treatment option for them; and representation that diversifies the workforce in clinics, cancer centers, and research offices. A community-informed, prioritized research agenda provides a road map for the three cancer centers to collaborate on future initiatives that are important to patients and stakeholders, to ultimately reduce the burden of cancer for all Philadelphians.

Multiinstitutional cohort study of patient outcomes in Child-Pugh (CP) B liver function treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

50 Background: A+B is commonly used as first line systemic therapy in HCC patients with CP-B liver function, although in the IMbrave150 clinical trial, its efficacy was only assessed in patients with CP-A liver function. We evaluated outcomes in patients with CP-B liver function and compared to those with CP-A. Methods: We completed a multi-institution, retrospective review of patients with HCC from Mayo Clinic and University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, who had received A+B in the first line setting between March 2018 and November 2023. CP score was calculated at time of treatment, response was assessed, and progression free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival were determined using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: Among 322 patients with HCC, median age was 66.5 years, 78.6% were male, and 82.6% were white. Eighty-six patients (27%) had CP-B liver function, while 226 (70%) had CP-A and 10 (3%) had CP-C. Etiology of liver disease in patients with CP-B included hepatitis B in 7.0%, hepatitis C in 38.4%, alcohol use in 30.2%, and metabolic associated steatohepatitis in 20.9%. Median OS in patients with CP-B liver function was 6.4 months, while mOS was 21.6 months for those with CP-A ( p<0.0001). Further stratifying, mOS in those with CP-B7 was 9.1 months, CP-B8 was 5.5 months, and CP-B9 was 4.0 months. 12-month OS in patients with CP-B was 32.4%, compared to 69.3% in CP-A. Median PFS was 4.8 months in those with CP-B and 8.9 months in those with CP-A. Median PFS in those with CP-B7, -B8, and -B9 was 6.4 months, 2.7 months, and 2.7 months, respectively. Among those with CP-B, 1 patient had a complete response, 17 (19.8%) had a partial response, 29 (33.7%) had stable disease, and 37 (43.0%) had progressive disease. Adverse events in CP-B patients included hypertension in 14.0% (grade 3 in 1 patient), bleeding in 16.3% (grade 3 or greater in 11.6%), fatigue in 38.4%, and an immune-related adverse event in 17.4% (grade 3 in 5.8%). Conclusions: Patients with advanced HCC and CP-B7 liver function may still benefit from A+B. Importantly, no additional safety risks were identified in this subgroup. Those with CP-B8 and CP-B9 have significantly worse survival than those with CP-B7 and the likelihood of benefit from systemic therapy is minimal. It is important for providers to address the impact of baseline liver function on expected outcomes in patient with HCC.

Bibliometric analysis of research trends in the relationship between frailty and neoplasms over the past decade

BackgroundThe relationship between frailty and neoplasms has attracted increasing attention from researchers in recent years. This study aims to identify current research hotspots and status in this field through bibliometric and visualization analysis.MethodsLiterature on the relationship between frailty and neoplasms, meeting the inclusion criteria, was collected from the Core Collection. Bibliometric analysis and visualization were performed using WoS, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace.ResultsOur study included 7410 documents on frailty and neoplasms, authored by 43,605 researchers from 9478 institutions across 115 countries, and published in 2067 journals. The USA emerged as the most productive and influential country in this field, with 3059 publications and 89,319 citations. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and Mayo Clinic were recognized as the most productive institution and the institution with the highest citation count, respectively. The Journal of Geriatric Oncology was the leading publisher. Kirsten K Ness and James L Kirkland were identified as the most productive and most cited authors, respectively. Cluster analysis identified five key areas: body condition and nutrition, quality of life, frailty, mortality and care, and the elderly and frailty.ConclusionThe relationship between frailty and neoplasms remains a contentious and frequently discussed topic. Our findings indicate that research primarily focuses on cancer, the elderly, clinical trials, adverse health outcomes, frailty assessment, and nutrition.

North American Cancer Center Clinical Research Capacity and Benchmarking in the Postpandemic Era.

Cancer center clinical trial offices (CCTOs) support trial development, activation, conduct, regulatory adherence, data integrity, and compliance. In 2018, the Association of American Cancer Institutes (AACI) Clinical Research Innovation (CRI) Steering Committee conducted and published survey results to benchmark North American CCTOs, including trial volume, accrual, full time equivalents (FTEs), and budget. The survey was readministered in 2023 to assess contemporary CCTO performance and capacity with results presented here. The 28 question 2023 survey was sent to directors of AACI's clinical member cancer centers. Survey participation was voluntary, no compensation was provided, and data requested covered operations during 2022. Definitions were consistent with National Cancer Institute (NCI) CCTO reporting requirements and AACI staff anonymously compiled results for descriptive statistical reporting. The survey response rate was 61% (60/99). The median annual CCTO budget was $11.5 million (M) US dollars (USD) versus $8.2M USD in 2018. These budgets support a median of 150 FTEs versus 104 previously, and a median total of 384 versus 280 interventional treatment trials and a median of 479 versus 531 interventional treatment accruals. Sources of support for CCTO annual budgets were primarily from industry revenue (45.3%) or institutional support (31.7%). Nearly 60% of centers reported activating NCI-sponsored studies within 90 days but only 9% reported meeting a 90-day activation timeline for industry sponsored studies. Contemporary benchmarks for CCTO operations through this survey demonstrate larger staff sizes, larger budgets, more trials supported, but fewer patients enrolled to interventional treatment trials in comparison with 2018. These data shine a critical light on the increasing complexity of cancer clinical trials, the importance of external funding sources, and necessary operational efficiency upgrades to provide cutting-edge cancer research and care.

Evaluation of a summer program for minority high school students in the clinical cancer center: The Future Gen Cancer Scholars program.

e13703 Background: Individuals from minoritized communities receive less cancer screening, have higher stage at cancer diagnosis, and experience higher death rates. Helping minority high school students find a pathway to enter college and continue with advanced education and training and become leaders in cancer treatment, research and prevention may help reduce these inequities. Many public high schools in urban centers struggle in STEM education. The Rhode Island Hospital / Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University partnered with the Papitto Opportunity Connection in Rhode Island to create the Future Gen Cancer Scholars program. Methods: High school students were invited to apply from Providence and surrounding communities. Accepted applicants became paid hospital employees and received training in professional conduct, protected health information and other skills necessary to shadow physicians in inpatient and outpatient settings. The summer curriculum included physician shadowing, radiology, pathology, student run tumor boards, seminars and community outreach. Pre/post-surveys were collected where students rated their experiences and beliefs regarding cancer careers on a 5-point Likert scale. Open-ended questions were added to evaluate interest in pursuing a career in oncology. Results: 20 high school students participated in the program’s first cohort. 70% self-identified as Hispanic/Latinx and 30% as African American, 85% were female, 90% attended a public school. Pre- and post-surveys were completed by 17 students. The 5-point Likert scale showed improvement in an understanding of oncology careers (pre, 3.9; post, 4.5), interest in pursuing a related career (pre, 3.1; post, 3.8), and recognition of available educational resources within their communities (pre, 3.9; post 4.3). Confidence in overcoming educational access barriers slightly decreased (pre-4.1; post-3.8) due to the increased awareness of the length, cost and process of medical training. Most students described the Future Gen Program as helping them identify career goals and a path forward. Conclusions: The Future Gen program helped solidify minority high school students’ desire to become leaders in cancer care and may provide a path forward to achieve this goal. We will track students’ educational and research achievements over time to measure the program’s impact. The establishment of a successful local model can provide a framework for a nationwide program.

Improving access to infusion services: Results of an operational sprint.

e13522 Background: As a large clinical academic cancer center growing from 40,772 unique patients in 2021 to 44,416 patients in 2022, access for patients to begin therapy in the infusion suite was delayed by 3.2 days. In addition to delays in care the center experienced decreased patient satisfaction related to timeliness of scheduling and an inflexible scheduling template that did not allow for the maximization of chair assets. An infusion sprint was launched to address the challenges with the main goal of providing a seamless patient experience while ensuring that all 60 chair assets were maximally utilized. The multi-disciplinary team sought to accomplish this through a disciplined evaluation and intervention program with the goals of increasing access, improving patient satisfaction and growing operating income. Methods: In February 2022, a multi-disciplinary team was assembled to develop and implement a plan to increase access to the infusion suite over a period of 6 months. The team utilized LEAN-Six Sigma principles to characterize current state, desired future state and tactical interventions with metrics. Access data, available infusion appointments and activities occurring in chairs were analyzed with the goal of maximizing utilization. This was accomplished through the development of an active asset management methodology that compared available infusion appointment hours in the schedule to the actual completed hours which allowed the center to determine the growth opportunity within the current chair count. Financial performance was reviewed, and a pilot of an AI-based scheduling platform was launched. Results: Data collected in December 2022 showed that the pilot increased average daily chemotherapy infusion patient volume by 10% and overall volume by 11% over prior fiscal year from October 2021 to September 2022. Daily scheduling escalations manually resolved by leadership decreased 54% between May 2022 and September 2022. Newly created chair utilization methodology showed increased utilization from 62% to 82% in 7 months and patient satisfaction increased from 76.97% to 81.18% for “Timeliness of Scheduling.” These initiatives also resulted in an 18% increase in infusion/pharmacy income from operations from October 2021 to September 2022. All of this was accomplished without adding staff to the workforce or chairs to the infusion suite. Conclusions: A focused, intentional, multi-disciplinary infusion sprint conducted over 6 months resulted in increases of patient access, increased patient satisfaction and revenue. External validity is limited by its one site design with future investigation planned at other sites within the cancer care network to determine if results can be reproduced.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) as first-line systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A multi-institution analysis of patient outcomes based on Child Pugh (CP) and ALBI liver function.

4099 Background: A+B is standard of care for advanced HCC in the first line setting, although was only evaluated in patients with CP class A liver function in IMbrave150. We sought to determine outcomes of patients in the real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a multi-institution retrospective analysis of patients with HCC who received A+B as first-line systemic therapy between March 2018 and November 2023, at Mayo Clinic and University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center. Treatment response was evaluated, and progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using the Kaplan Meier method. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazard regression method. Results: Among patients with HCC (n=322), 226, 86, and 10 had CP-A, -B, and -C liver function, while 120, 177, and 25 had ALBI grade 1, 2, and 3 liver function. Median age was 66.5 years, 78.6% were male, and 82.6% were white. Liver disease causes included hepatitis B (5.3%) and C (34.8%), ethanol use (26.1%), and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (15.5%). Macrovascular invasion was seen in 42.9%, and 30.4% had extrahepatic metastatic disease. Median OS for patients with CP-A5/6 was 21.6 months, B7 (n=49) was 9.1 months, and B8-C12 was 4.7 months ( p<0.0001). Median OS by ALBI grade was 34.9, 11.7, and 4.7 months for grades 1, 2, and 3. Median PFS was 8.9, 6.4, and 2.7 months for CP-A5/6, B7, and B8-C12 ( p<0.0001). Median PFS by ALBI grade was 11.0, 6.4, and 3.7 months for grades 1, 2, and 3 ( p=0.0001). Among patients with CP-A, those with ALBI grade 1 had mOS of 34.9 months versus 14.2 months for those with grade 2. Partial response was seen in 29.2%, 19.8% and 10.0% of patients with CP-A, -B, and -C, while 32.7%, 33.7%, and 40.0% had stable disease. In a univariate analysis, factors predictive of shorter OS included CP-B7 or CP-B8-C12, ALBI grade 2 or 3, hepatitis B, poorer ECOG performance status (PS), macrovascular invasion, non-white race, and lack of prior surgery or embolization. In multivariate analyses, CP score, ALBI grade, hepatitis B, ECOG PS, and macrovascular invasion were significantly associated with survival. There was significant interaction between CP and ALBI grade (Table). Conclusions: A+B remains a viable option in patients with CP-B7 liver function, although benefit is significantly less than those with CP-A. ALBI score has predictive value and can identify two prognostic groups among those with CP-A liver function. [Table: see text]

Single Institution Experience with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Vulvar and Vaginal Melanomas.

This study aimed to report clinical outcomes of patients with vaginal melanoma (VaM) or vulvar melanoma (VuM) who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and discuss the development of immune-related adverse events (irAE). This is a retrospective case series of patients diagnosed with VaM or VuM between July 2011 and September 2022 at the University of Virginia, Emily Couric Clinical Cancer Center. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment outcomes, and adverse events were abstracted. The primary outcome was incidence of irAE. Eight patients were included in this study, four with VaM and four with VuM. Most (n = 6) had local or regional disease at first presentation, and 25% (n = 2) presented with distant metastasis. All patients received a CTLA-4 inhibitor and 75% (n = 6) received PD-1 inhibitor alone or in combination with a CTLA-4 inhibitor. Most (75%, n = 6) patients experienced irAE. Of those who had irAE, 83% (n = 5) required therapy interruption or discontinuation. Most (66%, n = 4) underwent ICI rechallenge of which 75% (n = 3) experienced subsequent irAE. Of all patients in the series, 75% of patients (n = 6) had partial or complete response to ICI. This series is the first to detail incidence of irAEs and ICI rechallenges in vulvovaginal melanoma. Our findings indicate that while ICIs are effective, their use is associated with significant irAE development. Rechallenge of ICI after irAE is feasible but associated with risk of recurrent/new irAE. Further studies are needed to better quantify this risk.

Abstract C115: Framework for a community-based multiple myeloma screening program

Abstract Purpose: We develop a framework for a community-based screening program for multiple myeloma (MM). MM is known to be twice as common in Black/African American (B/AA) persons compared to white persons and B/AA patients have a higher risk of delay in initial treatment compared to white patients. Therefore, we developed a community-wide screening program for B/AA persons 50 years and older. As the first of these programs, we reveal an organizational framework that prioritizes engagement with key community partners who address barriers to cancer screening. Experimental Procedures: We expand organizational development knowledge about how to implement community-based MM screening and address barriers. The study uses an iterative and qualitative continuous improvement process. The study draws on literature review and multi-disciplinary team collaboration among clinicians, researchers, administrators, and the Cleveland Clinic Community Outreach Program (Cleveland Outreach). Data Summary: Our framework includes three interrelated partners and each address barriers to MM screening: 1) Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center. The multi-disciplinary team designs an educational brochure, secures pilot grant funding, plans for insurance/financial assistance as needed, develops care algorithms, and evaluates the impact of the program. Cleveland Outreach, a department within the Cancer Center, uses the Harold Freeman model as its foundational approach, which includes patient navigators and community outreach managers who are culturally/linguistically matched to medically underserved communities. The Cancer Center addresses barriers including program implementation despite a lack of national screening guidelines, insurance/financial barriers, and patient navigation to address fears and health literacy. 2) Faith-based organizations. Church leaders committed to cancer prevention participate in Cleveland Outreach’s faith-based outreach model. Faith-based partners address barriers of trust and fear. Also, by providing space at churches for on-site screening blood draws, they address transportation barriers. 3) Clinicians at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC’s). Providers and nurses at FQHC’s receive a Continuing Medical Education program about MM screening designed/funded by the Cancer Center. From within the community, providers notify medically underserved patients about the screening. With their primary care patient population, FQHC partners address barriers such as trust, health literacy, and fear of blood draws. They facilitate on-site screening at FQHC’s and health fairs, which addresses transportation barriers. Conclusions: Given that there are no universal guidelines for MM screening, we develop a novel approach to early disease detection in B/AA patients. Our framework is a partnership between the Cancer Center, faith-based organizations, and FQHC’s. Collaboratively, we address barriers to screening including fear, trust, insurance/financial, health literacy, transportation, and patient navigation if abnormal results suggest the need for further testing. Citation Format: Heather McKee Hurwitz, Kimberly Bell, Diana Basali, Raymond D. Jackson II, Jason Valent. Framework for a community-based multiple myeloma screening program [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C115.

Abstract B052: Associations of cancer patients' sociodemographic characteristics with cannabis-related behaviors

Abstract Background: Medical and non-medical cannabis is increasingly legalized and popularized in the US, yet there is a paucity of research on the subject, particularly in a cancer context. Previous research examining correlates of sociodemographic characteristics with cannabis-related behaviors are limited to gender-specific comparisons. In the present study, we examined how these behaviors by adults with cancer differed by age, gender, race, educational attainment, and cancer type. Methods: 943 patients attending any of 8 Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center clinics were recruited in person (n=721) or remotely (n=222) into an anonymous cross-sectional study. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age and were diagnosed with invasive cancer (all stages) in the past 12 months. Participants self-administered a validated, extensive cannabis-focused questionnaire, which queried on cannabis-related behaviors and use, along with demographic and clinical information. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regressions were used to examine associations between cannabis-related behaviors and sociodemographic factors and cancer type. Results: Participants were, on average, 61.7 ± 12.1 years old with at least some college education (70.4%). Older participants, aged ≥ 63 years, were less likely to be currently using cannabis (OR=0.27, 95% CI: 0.17-0.43; P<0.001) and less likely to be interested in cannabis (OR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.43-0.82; P=0.001) than younger participants. Participants with at least a 4-year college degree were less likely to be currently using cannabis (OR=0.48, 95% CI: 0.28-0.84, P=0.009) and less likely to have received a provider recommendation of cannabis use compared to the least educated (OR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.14-0.72, P=0.006). Patients with skin cancer were less likely to be currently using cannabis compared to those with lung cancer (OR=0.26, 95% CI: 0.07-0.92; P=0.037). Conclusions: Multiple factors (e.g., age, educational attainment) were associated with differences in cannabis-related behaviors among cancer patients. Results indicate that differences by sociodemographic characteristics exist, which may be associated with differences in symptom burden, patient-provider interactions, and other health behaviors. These results add to a burgeoning area of research and provide insight for future research and clinical inquiry related to cannabis use among cancer patients. Citation Format: Neema C. Adley, Jessica L. Krok-Schoen, Theodore M. Brasky, Jesse J. Plascak, Alison M. Newton, Anita Adib. Associations of cancer patients' sociodemographic characteristics with cannabis-related behaviors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B052.

TP53 Variant Allele Frequency and Therapy-Related Setting Independently Predict Survival in Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Del(5q)

Background: According to the international consensus classification (ICC), diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with del(5q) requires presence of i) del5q, alone or associated with no more than one other cytogenetic abnormality, exclusive of -7/del(7q), ii) <5% bone marrow (BM) and <2% circulating blasts, and iii) the absence of “multi-hit” TP53 ( Arber et al. Blood 2022;140: 1200). We have recently reported on TP53 variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥22% being the sole genetic predictor of inferior survival in MDS-del(5q) (Fleti. et al. AJH 2023;98:E76). In the current study, we examined the additional prognostic impact of therapy-related setting, in the context of TP53 VAF and other risk factors. Methods : The current study included patients with MDS-del(5q) who were seen at the Mayo Clinic or Moffitt Cancer Center, USA. Diagnosis of MDS-del(5q) and therapy-related qualification was according to ICC criteria ( Arber et al. Blood 2022;140: 1200), with the exception that patients with biallelic or multi-hit TP53 were included to allow unbiased analysis of impact on prognosis. Patient selection was based on availability of mutation information from next-generation sequencing (NGS). The latter was assessed either at diagnosis or at different time points during the disease course, but at least 3 months before leukemic transformation. Otherwise, all analyses, including estimation of overall and leukemia-free survival, were based on variables collected at time of initial diagnosis of MDS-del(5q). TP53 mutation VAF threshold of 22% was considered based on our previously published report cited above. Age cutoff at 67 years was determined by ROC analysis. Conventional statistical methods were applied using JMP Pro 16.0.0 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Results: A total of 210 patients (median age 72 years; 65% females), meeting the above-stipulated criteria for MDS-del(5q), were considered: 172 primary and 38 therapy-related. Table 1 outlines clinical and laboratory characteristics obtained at the time of diagnosis: 42% were transfusion-dependent, 69% had hemoglobin level <10 g/dL, 30% platelet count <150 x 10(9)/L, and 15% carried additional cytogenetic abnormality. NGS data performed either at diagnosis or at least 3 months prior to leukemic transformation was available in 146 patients; the most frequent mutations were TP53 (21%), SF3B1 (16%), DNMT3A (12%), TET2 (12%), ASXL1 (10%), and JAK2 (7%) (Table 1). At a median follow-up of 3.9 years (range 0.002-18.5) for living patients, 95 (45%) deaths and 34 (16%) leukemic transformations were recorded; treatment undertaken included lenalidomide in 162 (77%) cases. NGS data-exclusive multivariable analysis that included all 210 patients identified therapy-related setting (p<0.01; HR 2.9; Figure 1a), age >67 years (p=0.01; HR 1.8), transfusion-dependency (p=0.04; HR 1.5), and platelet count <150 x 10(9)/L (p=0.03; HR 1.6), as independent predictors of inferior survival. The significant effect of age and platelet count was sustained when analysis was limited to patients with primary MDS-del(5q) but lost when applied to therapy-related disease. NGS data-inclusive multivariable analysis, which was applicable to the subset of 146 patients, identified, as risk factors, therapy-related setting (p<0.01; HR 2.3) and TP53 VAF ≥22% (p<0.01; HR 2.4; Figure 1b) while age >67 years sustained borderline significance (p=0.07; HR 1.8). Figure 1c depicts survival data based on the presence or absence of TP53 VAF ≥22% and therapy-related qualification; low-risk with no risk factors (N=112; median survival 11.7 years; 5/10-year survival 73%/52%) and high-risk with one or both risk factors (N=34; median survival 4 years; 5/10-year survival 42%/14%); leukemia-free survival was affected by TP53 VAF ≥22% (p<0.01) but not therapy-related setting (p=0.13). Conclusions : The current study highlights TP53 VAF and therapy-related setting as the most prominent risk factors for survival in MDS-del(5q) and proposes a simple risk model that distinguishes patients with a projected 10-year survival that exceeds 50%, in the absence of both risk factors, and plummets to 14%, in the presence of one of the two risk factors. Accordingly, allogeneic stem cell transplant might be deferred in the former instance while it should be pursued sooner than later, in the latter instance.

Clinicopathologic Features and Survival Outcomes of Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma of Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue (MALT Lymphoma) of the Urothelial Organs (Urologic MALT Lymphoma): The Mayo Clinic Experience (2013-2022)

Introduction: Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma) is a low-grade B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that originates in lymphoid tissue of epithelial lined structures. The commonest site for this lymphoma is the stomach (gastric MALT lymphoma). MALT lymphoma in other mucosal sites, including other gastrointestinal sites, lungs, salivary glands, and lacrimal glands, has been well-described. However, MALT lymphoma in urothelial organs (kidneys, ureters, and urinary bladder) has not been well-characterized. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features and therapeutic outcomes in urologic MALT lymphoma (U-MALT). Methods: We identified patients with U-MALT who were treated at the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center between March 2013 and May 2022 through electronic medical chart review. Clinical, pathologic, radiologic, therapeutic, and survival data were extracted. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the survival outcomes. Results: The characteristic features of six patients (N=6) with U-MALT are summarized in Table-1. 4/6 (67%) are Caucasian, and 3/6 (50%) are males. The median age at diagnosis was 73.5 years. Urologic sites are the urinary bladder (3/6), kidneys (3/6), and ureter (1/6, this patient had both kidney and ureter involvement). 4/6 patients had primary U-MALT. Concurrent non-urologic involvement was identified in 3/6 patients and included bone marrow, lungs, stomach, and axillary lymph nodes. Bone marrow involvement was observed in 2/6 patients.Next-generation sequencing was performed on one patient's peripheral blood, revealing an ATM mutation. Regarding the initial clinical presentation, kidney-involved U-MALT patients presented with renal failure, and those with urinary bladder/ureteric involvement, U-MALT was diagnosed incidentally upon cystoscopic evaluation and biopsy. Various management strategies were used, including observation, surgical resection, and rituximab treatment. Notably, all patients achieved complete remission (CR) except one with partial response to rituximab, who subsequently achieved CR with the Bendamustine/Rituximab regimen. Median follow-up is 6 years (range, 1-10). All six patients are alive without relapse at the time of analysis, with the flat overall survival curve at 100%, indicating excellent long-term survival. Conclusions: Our study indicates that urologic MALT lymphomas are extremely rare and predominantly affect elderly people. The most common urologic sites are the kidneys and urinary bladder. Urologic manifestations are dependent on the urologic site involved. They can be primary to the urologic structures or part of the disseminated systemic marginal zone lymphoma. They can be treated like other low-grade lymphomas with observation, surgical resection, and systemic therapy. They appear to be quite responsive to CD-20 targeted therapy with Rituximab. Prognosis appears to be excellent with long overall survival. Further research with multi-institutional studies is needed to study this rare lymphoma entity and identify optimal therapy.

Experience with Gray Zone Lymphoma (GZL) at Mayo Clinic: A Review of Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes

Introduction: Gray zone lymphoma (GZL) is a rare lymphoid neoplasm exhibiting features intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. Due to its rarity and relatively recent recognition by the World Health Organization in 2008, the natural history, clinical behavior, and best treatment strategies are still evolving. We present a retrospective review of GZL patients diagnosed and managed at the Mayo Clinic. This study aims to explore the clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes of this poorly understood disease. Methods: After reviewing the electronic medical records of patients presented to the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center between March 2012 and July 2022 at the Mayo Clinic, we identified the patients who were diagnosed with GZL. Clinicopathological characteristics, disease features, treatment modalities, and outcomes were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to assess survival outcomes. Results: Six patients (n=6) with GZL, all Caucasian and predominantly male 4/6 (67%), were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 37 years (range 24-57). Disease characteristics included high rates of mediastinal involvement 5/6 (83%) and bulky disease 4/6 (67%), with various stages of Ann Arbor classification represented. First-line treatment regimen varied between R-CHOP, ABVD, and DA R-EPOCH. The R-CHOP regimen was received in 3/6 patients (50%); the first patient achieved Complete Remission (CR), then managed with R-ICE, followed by consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) when relapsed. The second patient had Partial Response (PR) to R-CHOP and required consolidative radiotherapy to achieve CR, and the third R-CHOP patient achieved CR however, after multiple disease progressions that were managed with multiple regimens including R-ICE, R-CODOX-M/IVAC regimen, Nivolomab/Ipilumuab, consolidative radiotherapy, and Brentuximab vedotin. The ABVD regimen was received by 2/6 patients (33%). The first patient had CR, and the second patient had disease progression, which required treatment with R-ICE, followed by consolidative radiotherapy and auto-SCT. One patient (17%) received the DA R-EPOCH regimen and achieved CR, consolidated with auto-SCT. The median follow-up for our cohort is nine years (range, 5-13). All six GZL patients are alive and in CR (since 2019 or before) at the time of the study analysis, with an excellent flat overall survival curve. For this reason and due to the small patient sample, we could not calculate the progression-free survival data. Conclusions: Our Mayo Clinic review provides unique insights into managing Gray Zone Lymphoma (GZL), a rare disease. We reported 100% survival and remission in six GZL patients using diverse treatment strategies, contrasting with varied outcomes from other institutions. This underscores the potential of individualized treatments for GZL and the need for further, broader studies to validate our findings and refine optimal treatment approaches for this rare disease entity.

Effect of Integrin α 4β 1 -VCAM-1 Interactions in JAK2V617F Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Pro-Thrombotic Interactions

Introduction: The JAK2 V617Fmutation, which occurs in up to 95% of polycythemia vera (PV) myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients, increases thrombosis risk 6-fold. A recent study in PV mice demonstrated that blocking JAK2 V617F+ leukocyte-mediated β1/β2 integrin interactions with anti-VCAM-1 antibodies decreases thrombosis. Interestingly, hydroxyurea (HU), a common PV treatment, reduces leukocyte and red cell α4β1 integrin expression. Overall, JAK2 V617F+ mouse models show inconsistent thrombosis and bleeding phenotype, hindering pre-clinical study reproducibility; therefore, we have developed an in vitro endothelialized microfluidic model to assess MPN-flow behavior. We hypothesized that in our microfluidic model, disrupting α4β1 integrin expression on JAK2 V617F+ leukocytes would reduce pro-adhesive interactions. We tested this hypothesis by assessing JAK2 V617F+ MPN blood flow in untreated and hydroxyurea treated subjects and through addition of a monoclonal antibody against α4β1 integrin, natalizumab. Methods: Primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were exposed to venous shear (15 dynes/cm 2) in microfluidics for a 4-day culture period. On day 4, endothelialized microfluidics were treated +/- 10 ng/mL TNFα for 4 hours. Blood samples were obtained from consented JAK2 V617F MPN individuals aged >18 years with ET, PV, or MF as diagnosed by the WHO 2016 Criteria identified in the M Health Fairview Masonic Cancer Center Clinics. Healthy age, race, and sex-matched blood samples served as controls. Clinical data on patients was collected and stored in REDCAP. Platelets and leukocytes were visualized using Calcein AM. Samples were treated +/- 0.25 μg/mL natalizumab for 30 minutes, then perfused through the microfluidic under a microscope to observe blood-endothelial interactions in real-time. Post-experiment, videos were analyzed to quantify velocity and adhesion of platelets and leukocytes for each treatment condition. Results: When perfused over TNF-α activated endothelium, both controls ( JAK2 negative, n=11) and JAK2 V617F MPN (n=20) had a significant reduction in cell velocity. Furthermore, compared to controls, JAK2 V617F MPN individuals exhibited significantly lower cell velocities. In multi-variate analysis, reduction in cell velocity was independent of white blood cell, hemoglobin, hematocrit or platelet counts. Hydroxyurea is a standard therapy in JAK2 V617F MPN and is known to reduce α4β1 expression. Therefore, we performed subgroup analysis in our JAK2 V617F MPN cohort based on treatment. When perfused over TNF-α activated endothelium, individuals with JAK2 V617F MPN (n=9) not on therapy (newly diagnosed) or on phlebotomy/aspirin only had a significant reduction in cell velocity. In the same conditions, HU-treated JAK2 V617F MPN patients (n=9) had no change in cell velocity. There was no difference in complete blood counts between these groups. In a separate subgroup analysis, compared to untreated JAK2 V617F MPN patients (n=9), interferon-treated JAK2 V617F MPN patients (n=5) had a greater reduction in cell velocity. Last, we specifically targeted α4β1 integrin by adding natalizumab to either control (n=7) or untreated JAK2 V617F MPN (n=3) samples. On inactivated endothelium, treatment of either control or JAK2 V617F MPN blood with natalizumab did not significantly change cell velocity. On a TNF-α activated endothelium, treatment of control (n=7) and JAK2 V617F MPN blood (n=3) with natalizumab led to a recovery in cell velocity. Conclusion: Our data suggests that the interaction between integrin α4β1 on JAK2 V617F cell surface and VCAM-1 on activated endothelium is important for initiation of pro-thrombotic interactions. JAK2 V617F MPN individuals treated with HU exhibit decreased adhesion to activated endothelium compared to control; JAK2 V617F MPN individuals treated with interferon exhibit increased adhesion. In the microfluidic system, based on current findings, blockage of integrin α4β1-VCAM-1 interactions using natalizumab is a potential therapeutic strategy. Further mechanistic studies evaluating interferon and cell populations changed by therapies as they pertain to integrin α4β1 are underway.

Colon cancer survival after radical surgery performed in hospitals of the Arkhangelsk region: a population-based analysis

Background. surgery is the main method of treatment of colon cancer (cc). Radical surgery performed in non-specialized hospitals can lead to the adverse outcomes.The aim of this study was to assess CC survival after radical surgery performed in state hospitals of the arkhangelsk region (North-West Russia) in 2010–21.Material and Methods. data on all the 2142 cases of radical surgery of CC were obtained from the arkhangelsk regional cancer registry (ARCR). One- and five-year cancer-specific survival rates were estimated by the survival tables; cumulative survival function was calculated by the Kaplan–meier method. Univariate and multiple cox regression analysis was carried out to identify independent predictors associated with CC death risk after radical surgery in state hospitals (incl. sex, age at the time of diagnosis, topography, morphology and stage of CC).Results. less than half (42.8 %) of patients underwent surgery at the arkhangelsk clinical cancer center (accc), a single specialized hospital. one- and five-year survival rates of all patients were 86.5 % (95 % CI: 84.9–87.9 %) and 65.1 % (95 % ci: 62.7–67.4 %), respectively. The 5-year survival rate of patients who underwent surgery in the accc was significantly higher than that in patients who underwent surgery in other state non-specialized hospitals (76.0 % (95 % ci: 72.5–79.0 % versus 49.3–73.8 %, p<0.0001). The relative risk of death of CC patients depended on the state hospital where radical surgery was performed and the stage of CC; it did not depend on patients’ sex, morphology and topography of CC.Conclusion. our results demonstrate the need to search for specific reasons for the relatively low survival in patients after radical surgery performed in non-specialized hospitals.

Outcomes in Mantle Cell Lymphoma with Central Nervous System Involvement - a Dual Center Study

Background Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is a rare complication (<5% of cases) of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and is associated with poor outcomes, highlighting the need for novel treatment approaches. We report the outcomes of a large cohort of patients (pts) with CNS MCL from Mayo Clinic and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). Methods MCL pts with CNS involvement seen at Mayo Clinic and MSKCC between 1/2000-1/2021 were included. CNS involvement was defined by histologically confirmed CNS MCL, CSF analysis demonstrating lymphoma cells, and/or neuroimaging findings compatible with CNS lymphoma. Medical records were reviewed for baseline characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. First-line MCL chemotherapy was categorized into higher intensity chemotherapy (i.e., anthracycline-based +/- high-dose cytarabine), moderate intensity chemotherapy (i.e., bendamustine-based regimens or single agent chemotherapy), and other. CNS treatment regimens were categorized as intrathecal (IT) therapy alone, systemic therapy (with CNS penetration such as IV cytarabine or IV methotrexate) with/without IT therapy, regimens with Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy, or radiation alone. Kaplan-Meier method was used for time to event analysis. Forest plots were developed using univariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results Seventy patients were included in the cohort, 34 from MSKCC and 36 from Mayo Clinic. Median age at MCL diagnosis was 65 years (range 56-72) and 52 were male (74%). MIPI score was available in 60 pts: low (n=10, 17%), intermediate (n=20, 33%), and high (n=30, 50%) risk. First line therapy included: higher intensity chemotherapy (n=42, 60%), moderate intensity chemotherapy (n=25, 36%) and other (n=3, 4%). Twenty-five (36%) pts underwent autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in CR1. Median time from initial MCL diagnosis to CNS involvement was 24 months (m) (range 0-167). Four (6%) pts had CNS involvement at initial diagnosis. Abnormal CNS imaging was reported in 53 (76%) pts: leptomeningeal (n=37), leptomeningeal and parenchymal (n=4), parenchymal (n=8), orbital (n=4). The most common regimen following CNS diagnosis was systemic therapy with or without IT therapy (n=34, 54%) followed by treatment including BTKi (n=13, 21%), IT alone (n=10, 16%), radiation alone (n=3, 5%), and treatment including CAR-T (n=3, 5%). Three patients elected hospice care and four patients had missing/unknown CNS treatment. The overall CNS response to therapy was available in 54 patients: CR in 22 (41%) pts, PR in 8 (15%), SD in 11 (20%), and PD in 13 (24%) pts. Of the 70 patients, 63 died. Median follow up was 6.9 years (range: 1.6-11.2) from initial MCL diagnosis and 2.1 years from CNS diagnosis (range: 0.4-7.9). Median OS from MCL diagnosis was 3.4 years (95% CI: 2.4-4.6). In univariable Cox models, sex, stage, performance status, Ki67, or first line systemic chemotherapy type were not significantly associated with OS from MCL diagnosis. Low risk MIPI score (score < 5.7) was associated with favorable OS (HR 0.31, 94% CI: 0.12-0.77; p value 0.01) compared to high risk. First-line treatment and treatment intensity were not associated with a significant difference in OS. Median PFS for the first CNS-directed therapy was 2.4 m (95% CI: 1.7-4.3). Cause of death was disease-related in a majority (n=49, 78%) of pts and therapy-related in 10% (n=6). The remaining 8 deaths had cause of death reported as missing or other (13%). Median OS from CNS involvement was 5.1 m (95% CI: 3.3-10.0) (Figure 1). When assessing OS from time of CNS diagnosis, treatment regimens incorporating BTK inhibitors were associated with a more favorable OS compared to systemic therapy +/- IT therapy (HR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.16-0.89, p value=0.03) (Figure 2). Conclusions Our dual center series confirms patients with CNS involvement by MCL have poor outcomes. When evaluating OS from the time of CNS diagnosis, novel therapies, including BTKi and CAR-T, may be more effective than CNS-penetrant chemotherapy for treatment of CNS relapse suggesting newer therapeutic approaches are required to improve outcomes.

A First in Human Phase I Trial (LS1681) of Abraxane/Rituximab 160 Nm Nanoparticle (AR160) in Relapsed Refractory B-Cell Lymphomas Including Transformed Follicular Lymphoma: A Final Report

Introduction: Nanotechnology for cancer therapy aims to increase drug delivery to tumor sites while lowering toxicity. AR160 is a novel 160 nm nano-immunoconjugate consisting of commercial grade nab-paclitaxel (NP) nanoparticles non-covalently coated with rituximab (R) for targeted delivery into tissues expressing CD20. The drug delivery system and clinical grade product was developed in the laboratory of Svetomir N. Markovic, M.D.,Ph.D. Single agent rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m 2 in relapsed patients with aggressive lymphomas is not utilized and has limited activity in patients with multiple relapses. Taxanes (Younes 1995, Wilson 1995) have modest clinical activity as a single agent with overall response rates of 23% and 17%, respectively, when administered at doses of 200 mg/m 2 and 140 mg/m 2 in previously treated patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We hypothesized that utilizing the targeted ability of rituximab that the AR160 taxane nanoparticle would have activity in relapsed B-cell NHL and offer a new class of agents for relapsed B-cell NHL. Methods: A 3+3 phase I clinical trial was conducted in patients with relapsed refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma to determine the maximum tolerated dose of AR160 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were required to have had prior systemic treatment with no other therapy with clinical benefit. Patients with aggressive lymphoma were required to have a stem cell transplant if transplant eligible. AR160 was prepared on-site in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center Research Pharmacy, and the product was reconstituted by mixing the two agents delivering as one combined infusion at a specific concentration. The starting dose level (DL1) was NP at 100mg/m 2 with R at 40 mg/m 2. These doses were significantly lower than standard doses. Disease evaluations were conducted after every 2 treatment cycles using CT based criteria from the revised 2014 Lugano Classification or PET scans. Patients were treated until disease progression or intolerability. Samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) studies. Results: Nine (7 males and 2 females) patients with a median age of 61 (range 55-84 years) were enrolled (2 follicular lymphoma (FL), 1 previously transformed from FL to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) followed by FL relapse, 1 high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements transformed from FL, 1 transformed FL to DLBCL, 2 high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements, 1 high-grade B-cell lymphoma NOS and 1 mantle cell lymphoma. The median number of prior treatments was 4 (range 3-16). At dose level 1, all 3 of the first 3 patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (C1D15, C4D1, and C1D15) with the C4D1 a grade 4 and unlikely related. After the first three patients, de-escalation to dose level -1 was implemented per protocol with NP at 75 mg/m 2 and rituximab at 30 mg/m 2. There was one patient with a grade 3 non-hematological adverse event all possibly related to treatment (anorexia, diarrhea, and enterocolitis). There were 6 partial responses (71%), 1 complete response (14%) with high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangement, 1 stable disease with mantle cell lymphoma and 1 patient had progressive disease. Six of the 9 patients were alive with subsequent therapies. PK evaluation is pending. Conclusion: AR160 therapy is a novel drug delivery system incorporating significantly lower doses of paclitaxel and rituximab that is safe and demonstrates promising clinical activity in patients with low-grade and high-grade previously treated B-cell lymphomas. This principle of treatment is applicable to other disorders. Further clinical testing is warranted in these patient populations.

Uptake of palliative care services in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: The Mayo Clinic Florida experience.

269 Background: There are strong data showing that patients (pts) with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving chemotherapy experience better quality of life (QOL) and longer overall survival (OS) when palliative care (PC) services are integrated early in their treatment course. Therefore, at our cancer center, pts with stage IV NSCLC have been referred to PC by oncology providers. In this study, we evaluated the uptake of PC services, specifically in pts with NSCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). ICIs have been considered to have less severe or less frequent adverse effects as compared to chemotherapy, possibly leading to fewer referrals to PC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all pts at the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center in Florida who received single-agent ICI therapy for the treatment of stage IV NSCLC at any point between July 1, 2015, and July 1, 2022. The primary aim was to evaluate the uptake of PC services before or during treatment with ICIs. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize pt demographics and outcomes. Results: 129 pts were identified. 53.4% were male, and 46.6% were female. The majority of pts (84.4%) were white. 62 pts (48.0%) were seen by a PC provider before or during ICI treatment; 41 of these (31.7%) were seen by PC after starting ICI therapy. When grouped by year of ICI initiation, 30/73 pts (41.0%) treated between 2015 and June 2018 were seen by a PC provider, as compared to 15/31 pts (48.3%) treated between July 2018 and June 2020 and 17/25 pts (68.0%) treated between July 2020 and July 2022. Interestingly, the majority of pts who received PC services in the 2020-2022 group (12/17, or 70.5%) were seen by a PC provider for the first time prior to ICI initiation, whereas the majority of pts who received PC services prior to July 2020 (37/45, or 82.2%) were seen by a PC provider for the first time after ICI initiation. The mean number of PC visits increased from 1.59 in the 2015-2018 group to 1.84 in the 2018-2020 group and 4.96 in the 2020-2022 group. Conclusions: Uptake of PC services in pts with stage IV NSCLC receiving single-agent ICIs at our cancer center has increased over time, which is encouraging. Nevertheless, the numbers remain suboptimal, with less than 70% of pts receiving PC services. We plan to develop a multidisciplinary quality improvement project involving implementation of a mechanism to ensure that most patients with stage IV NSCLC, regardless of the type of systemic treatment they receive, are receiving PC services.

Quality improvement project to improve smoking cessation among an oncology cohort at a large US multistate cancer center.

435 Background: Assessing tobacco use and providing cessation support is recommended by the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO). As part of the National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Cessation Initiative, we established an electronic health record based "opt-out" approach to refer patients to tobacco treatment specialists. However, the role of oncologists in contributing to the “opt-out” approach to patients has not been explored. We tested the hypothesis that a multi-component educational program for oncologists would increase the proportion of patients who completed tobacco treatment appointments. Methods: As a quality improvement initiative, oncology providers at the Rochester Mayo Clinic Cancer Center were educated using a multimodal academic detailing approach with group and individual educational sessions. Its effectiveness was tested using a modified step-wedge implementation design. The primary outcomes were patient behaviors that could plausibly be changed by conversations with their provider: the rate at which cancer patients identified as current tobacco users scheduled an appointment in the Nicotine Dependence Center, and the rate at which patients scheduled for a NDC appointment completed their appointment. Comparisons were made before, during, and after the education period (from July through Dec 2019) and with a separate group of providers who did not complete education (results examined over a similar time period). Results: Education intervention did not improve outcomes among providers who received education; indeed, the rate of appointment scheduling decreased, although this may reflect other concurrent changes in the tobacco treatment referral process (Table 1). Outcomes were similar between oncology providers who did and did not receive multicomponent education intervention. Conclusions: Smoking cessation efforts can be successfully integrated into routine cancer care. The implementation of the “opt-out” referral system resulted in approximately 1 in 5 patients being seen for tobacco use, but a multicomponent education intervention designed to equip oncologists to encourage patients to complete appointments was not effective. Novel approaches are needed to increase the uptake of tobacco treatment among patients.[Table: see text]

Kelsey-Seybold Clinic Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Kelsey-Seybold Clinic Cancer Center, Houston, Texas