You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP04-06 INCIDENCE OF URETHRAL STRICTURE FOLLOWING ENDOSCOPIC PROSTATE SURGERY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIALS Ee Jean Lim, Vineet Gauhar, Giacomo Maria Pirola, Emanuele Rubilotta, Marcelo Langer Wroclawski, Dong Le Quy, Marilena Gubbiotti, Vinson Wai, Shun Chan, Mariela Corrales, Esther Garcia Rojo, Thomas R.W. Herrman, Jeremy Yuen, Chun Teoh, Hong Kong, and Daniele Castellani Ee Jean LimEe Jean Lim More articles by this author , Vineet GauharVineet Gauhar More articles by this author , Giacomo Maria PirolaGiacomo Maria Pirola More articles by this author , Emanuele RubilottaEmanuele Rubilotta More articles by this author , Marcelo Langer WroclawskiMarcelo Langer Wroclawski More articles by this author , Dong Le QuyDong Le Quy More articles by this author , Marilena GubbiottiMarilena Gubbiotti More articles by this author , Vinson WaiVinson Wai More articles by this author , Shun ChanShun Chan More articles by this author , Mariela CorralesMariela Corrales More articles by this author , Esther Garcia RojoEsther Garcia Rojo More articles by this author , Thomas R.W. HerrmanThomas R.W. Herrman More articles by this author , Jeremy YuenJeremy Yuen More articles by this author , Chun TeohChun Teoh More articles by this author , Hong KongHong Kong More articles by this author , and Daniele CastellaniDaniele Castellani More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002521.06AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Urethral stricture (US) is a well-known long-term complication of endoscopic procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This systematic review aims to evaluate the incidence and influencing factors of US in relation to different surgical endoscopic techniques for treating clinical BPH. METHODS: We performed a systemic literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Controlled Register of Trials. The PICOS (Patient Intervention Comparison Outcome Study type) model was used to frame and answer the clinical question. The incidence of urethral stricture was estimated by comparing the results of the studies that used different endoscopic techniques. Patients were assigned in groups according to the type of surgery and regardless of energy used (enucleation, ablation and resection group). The incidences of US were pooled using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method with the random effect model and reported as Risk Ratio (RR), 95% Confidence Intervals (CI), and p-values. Analyses were two-tailed, and the significance was set at p <0.05 and a 95% CI. Study heterogeneity was assessed utilizing the I2 value. Substantial heterogeneity was defined as an I2 value >50% or a Chi2 p-value <0.10. RESULTS: A total of 80 studies were included for meta-analysis. There was no significant heterogeneity among the studies, with an I2 0%, Chi2 16.98, p=0.88 for Enucleation vs TURP studies and I2 0%, Chi2 27.71, p=0.99 for the Ablation vs TURP ones. The pooled incidence of US was 1.7% after enucleation, 2.1% after ablation, 3.8% after monopolar (M)-TURP and 2.1% after bipolar (B)-TURP. The incidence of US was significantly lower after Enucleation than after TURP (RR 0.58 95% CI 0.39-0.84, p=0.004). US incidence was lower for Ablation procedures than after TURP, but the difference did not reach significance (RR 0.79 95% CI 0.61-1.3, p=0.08). However, this was significant in the subgroup of M-TURP studies (RR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.49-0.91, p=0.01). Sub-analysis showed that the risk of US was significantly lower after Enucleation than after TURP within 12 months after surgery (RR 0.51 95% CI 0.33-0.81, p=0.004). The mean postoperative catheterization was significantly shorter in laser treatments than in TURP also potentially influencing US incidence. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows an increased incidence of US after TURP compared to enucleation and ablation procedures. The main factors related to increased US incidence are the use of monopolar energy, instrument caliber and duration of postoperative catheterization. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e59 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ee Jean Lim More articles by this author Vineet Gauhar More articles by this author Giacomo Maria Pirola More articles by this author Emanuele Rubilotta More articles by this author Marcelo Langer Wroclawski More articles by this author Dong Le Quy More articles by this author Marilena Gubbiotti More articles by this author Vinson Wai More articles by this author Shun Chan More articles by this author Mariela Corrales More articles by this author Esther Garcia Rojo More articles by this author Thomas R.W. Herrman More articles by this author Jeremy Yuen More articles by this author Chun Teoh More articles by this author Hong Kong More articles by this author Daniele Castellani More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Read full abstract